Loading...
MINUTES - Council - 19660815'·-H••-' fiJINUTES OF T~r~ 14-T}': R~GUIJJ~ ;·.,rE:~TING GF G~YUNCIL 2~3T~'J: IN TEI;~ C.VUNCIL CH.tU!JB.::;a:S ·ON MONDAY, LUGUGT 15th, 1966 at 8:00 P.M, F(L~SENT : i\MYO~ C.F, DLVIS (IN TH:Z CHAIR) REE1VE S.G. F'l;.TRICK DEPUTY~R~~EVE SIIi1lvlON3 COUNCILLO:'W Cm.BETT, :;,AVI23, ILLINGJORTH, lruRRAY, TRENT A.ND eiLLli:lilSON COUNCILL01:{ ILLING\JORTI-'J presented a state,Jent regarding the strike at Sterling Drug Ltd: Before commencing with the agenda for the evening, I beg the indulgence of Council to introduce a subject which I feel is of the utmost iwportance, and should be discussed at the beg;:nning of the meeting and not take to chance th2t we will not get into New 3usiness on the agenda, The subject is the strike at Sterling Drug which is now in its 6th or 7th week and with no apparent end in sight. In every labour dispute there are three· principals -labour, management and the public. The length of the strike is having and will continue-to have an adverse effect on the economy of the Town and surrounding area, and it is for this reason that I feel it is partly our concern. i>S there are three principals involved in the strike, sometimes it takes a third person to start conciliation procedures, Theri?fore, I recom:~end to ·this Council, that the lJ1ayor be authorized to.· i~vi te labour and management to meet with them in these Chambers and I sincerely hope that the .-,Jeeting will he but the start to a mutually agreeable and early settlement, ILLINGJORTH: "Resolved that the reco,~.;r,endation contained in this report be adopted." I "'··-·~· REGULJ:R - 2 - AUGUST lqth, 1966. COUNCILLOR ILLING:~;OR'rH ST lT:S:JJS!:IT_fON'f. CGUNCILLO':':: HILLH:G3DN said that if CounciUor Ulingworth would add the words "when arbitration has been co;ruenced." COUNCILLO':t ILLING':lO::CTiiK said that he ;;;eant only for the hlayor to write both sides and offer his services to ;:;,eet with them. CCUNCILL011 MUFCRLY asked if it was not the j_Jerog&tive of the head of the Council to offer his services at cWlY ti"1e, and he wondered if it is proper for Council to cowpe1 him to do so. COUNCILLOE ILLINGVORTH said he ;;,eant for his motion to indicate that Council would support t'J.e Mayor if he decided to do so, and he would add th,ase words to his motion. ILLING'.'fO:tTH: WILLI AI,lSON: ''Resolved that this Council will support the i\ilayor should he decide to offer his services ~:md meet ~'ri th both parties in the present stri!{e in Aurar a .. n c.&~s.r;m. COUNCILLO:t{ TEE~NT rose on a point of privilege and asked the l\ilayor to explain to Council his findings re the 90 day def er~nent , et. MAYOR DLVIS said that he had obtained an interpretation which he read: Pursuant to a recent cc.eeting of Council I stated I would obtain a ruling concerning the re-introduction of a question concerning the sale of the Church :Jtreet School and the question of a 90 dc:y waiting period. I did obtain a rulinz tbcct indicEletes tT.1e only means by which a negative vote cs,n be revoked is by proposing another question similar in its general purport to that wbich has been rejected but with sufficient variance to constitute a nGw question ·-·-··-~~ • .,.,. J •••• -,,~.--··"·"' '"-'• ·····--~-··--··~----·-·-----~·-·-~···· • ~·---•~------------·-------·~~VA•~·~---~n~·-~~~':"'·~--~T.T.~-"~-~~--""'''"~~~-~··'<-'--,.,=---• ~...,.~~--.-------••••••T-•••-~·-·~,.-..-· ·-~""-··------"'·~~ I REGULf..R -3 -AUGUST 15th, 1966 MAYOR DAVIS INTi;;;RPS:STLTION CD!IJTINUSD re 90 day waiting period May I read the context of the ruling obtained: Rescission: Though a resolution cannot be reconsidered in parliament, the saiile object is obtained by rescinding the vote on which it was passed. Technically the motion to rescined is a new question and thus the same question whic::t has been resolved in the 1'lffirmative is not again offered although its effect is annuled. A negative vote cannot be rescinded, If a ;;,e;c.ber moved such a rescission he would thereby 1'lsk the house to nulify a vote vn~ich had resulted in the rejection of a ""easure, .:md consequently, that _;,easmre would thereby be automatically revived and debc:,table, which means the,t the same question would have to be offered again. T:-:1e only means therefore by which a negative vote can be revok:ad is by proposing another question similar in its general purport to that which has been rejected but with sufficient variance to constitute a n'2W question; and the house would deter,;dne whether it were substantially the same question or not. [., mere alteration of the words of a question without any substantiil chan6e in its object will not be sufficient to evade the rule that no question shall be offered which is substantially the sa:.le as one of which the judgement of the house has already been expressed in the current session" It is my understanding that since.the above quotation appears to be ,, perli&aentary rule and is taken fro.Jl the text which appears to provide the bc:.sis for our procedure by-law, then this rule he followed in this case. However, the time liid t ;uentioned of 90 days a;Jpears to be of an unknown quantity. J:,pparently under parliallJentary procedure the sa.;,e question ;aay not be reintroduc•ad during the ''Current Sessioni'· It is my Oi_Jinion that the seme council tiu:t negatived the original question should J."e-introduce sair,e question, if this is the intent, and in that case I see nothing out of the way if the 90 day waiting period is considered a fact, COUNCILLOR TS:"2:NT referred to a text on Pc:rliamentc,ry Procedure. He said that the watter of reconsideration referred to ''sessions!' which does not a:c>ply to r.mnicip<cl Councils. ' . ..• ,.,-.'"·~,-, ...• '" "' ·· ,_,._....,_.~-.~-·~·-····-»2·"'• ·;.;;:,,,-~,--·-uc.·o·.·· -• •.• _ •-'= ..•• ~--·~-·-~·-"~""~------------------..• , . . , . , _ _. •. ... '·····-· --------~~·~·=="-=·=""'"'"'"""'"4"""''~""'"'~~"'"'""=·==··~-~-·~-·-·-......... ~~·--·-·--'-'-·---'-·-~'---·--'--~'.;..;. .• __________ . ..,_,~-~,. . ...-- REGULAR -4 - . / AUGUS'l" .'l;h, 1966• / T!:!AYOR DAVIS RE 90 D.I'.Y RULE CONT. COUNCIJ",.LOR ILLING':IVORTH said it would appear that the 90 day rule had co:.1e about through usage. COUNCILLOR JILLILloJSON said that in view of the explanations he was giving Notice of l!!otion that at the next Council C~Jeeting he was re-opening the question • COUNCILLOR ]:I!R~AY se~id that Council had only asked the lJlayor to bring in a ruling and he had done so. THZNT: "Resolved that the previous question ?.liifRICK: be put." COUNCILLOR IHEGIY said th10.t the subject had been left at the last meeting on the understanding that it was out of order. COUNCILLOR ILLING'!:'ORTH pointed out that there had been no resolution to adopt the NJayor' s ruling. COUNCILLOR T''t'2:NT said he would in that case withdraw his "'otiort. CONFIRMLTION OF 1Y1INUT2S - ACCOUNTS - ILLI!ITGiA'ORTH: "Resolved that the •uinutes of PA.TRICK: July 18 and July 25 be adopted as printed and circulated." C&tR. I2D • Lll accounts a~Jproved as printed and circulated. j , ,.! ~,_:_",~~-:-~~~-·"--~"'"""'~'~'·'·•--·~~-·.:......~~'~,' ~' '~" ·~· _:.:.-~-..:~_ .. .,;...;,.,'i-·~><-~ ..... --~""""""""' ~~;£ " ••-""'K~~-t':'"".,_"",-M,."'"'''"""""'-W:.,"--·~*o•O>~-·~·-~·~-~--··----'-<,.C,M-<J ...... ""--o-~.-.. --····--'----'-'·~- R2GULJIR -5 -.\;• li AUGUST 15th, COR;~:;:~s:? OND ENCE TOWN OF ORJILLIA A letter fro,;1 the Town of Orillia requesting support for a resolution regarding regulation of s;;,a1.1 aircr~ft. RE P..IaCClAFT A:PPOINT :. _____ MEIYJ3ER. 1967 c::!:rlT COM. AIR POLLUTION Councillor Illingv1orth said that the 2CAF was the agency assigned the responsibility for Search_and Rescue in Canada and ·.that this cost large sm.1s each year which ca:.1e out of the taxpayers' pockets. If this resolution could be enforced it would be a great asset even if it involved uore e:li;~Xmse for the aircraft owner. I)LLINGV:TOJRTH: "Resolved that the Town of J.urora support PATRICK: the resolution of the Town of Orillia, REPOaTS OF C0f\'I'·.1ITT:~s Jft5EVE ?ilTRICZ IN THE Ci-iAIR Mayor Davis presented a report of Council in Committee in which the Co:a.ni itee respectfully submit t:1e following The Co~m;i ttee of the whole "''et on Tuesday August 9, 1966 and reco.;;mend the following: 1. That the Chair;cllm of the :Parlw C.om.1i tte,e of Council be appointed as a .::e;;;ber of the 1966 Centennial Corm>1i ttee 2. Tiwt the ldr Pollution branch of the ~Jepartiilent of Health be e.sked to x,ake a study of sources of pollution within the Town of Aurora. Die VIS: "Resolved that the report of the Committee of the '//hole dated J;ugust 2, 1966 re SITiJi1!JONS; 1967 Centennial Cocu;ittee be accepted," C A·R:R IED • -.. ~, -~-· .: ""' ~ --·-~·.ll• ,-~·--'-----,~~--"'---·-·-:.:,;_...:.;.~--..:..--~··----·-·~~~-"'...:..W.,,_ .. ,,~v,;_~-=ci''·'''''•C-'""""-'\."<=~•=---==•~"'r-""'=<="•.,.-,="-W'~•,.•T,~··-~~'"~___...."-'~··•·•~•-•----~------~--•·•.......,__,~, •.. -~---v•-·••---~ ,·,-, REGULAR - 6 - AUGUST 15TH, REPORTS OF COUI.ViiTTEJ!:S CONTINUED MAYOR D.I'NIS presented a report of Personnel! & Liaison Committee in which the Committee respectfully submit the following cV.AGE 3C.AILE & \tl'ORIKING CONPITIONS f.; i;Jeeting was held on Tuesday, !:.ugust 2 1 1966 at 7:00 P.M. It was reco:;x~ended that a wage scale be prepared and considerable progress was made. Further meetings will be required to set up this schedule and working conditions in by-law form. Di.VIS: "Resolved that the report of the ILLING'.YORTH: P::>rsonnell & Liaison Committee, dated .August 12, 1966 1 be accepted." CJ'JRJRIED. MAYOR Dli.VI3 presented a report of Council in Co:nmi ttee in which the Coomnittee respectfully submit the following REVIE'iV OFFERS TO PURC~-lLSE FORI1SR ARENA SITE Council in Committee :.1et on Tuesday, August 2, to review offers to purchase on the old arena site. MAYOR ::lAVIS IN THE CHP,JR. The Co~IJa;_·ai ttee recoi~·~~.eends as follo~~vs: That letters be sent to the three bidders for the property outlining the type of development Council wish:as for this area and asking each to submit a proposal for this developi,lent by Thursday 1 August 18, 1966. DAVIS: i'!IYwLif.J,1SON: "Resolved that the report of Council in Committee, dated August 15 1 1966 1 re offers to purchase former arena site, be accepted." ' .. ._. ______ ,_ -.--.--~-,-<-.,.-.-,-,,---"---------"'""""'"" -"--'''~"""""-'·--~~---'------~--------.-.~.-.. ----·"'"·'"'-'·"''".MC-.,,.' _. ~--> <-'<'>•-'J . .o~<•""-' .... - ----~---·"·-----~-~--'~-~· _.,_,...;.~;_-~·-· ,,;.,.~~v-"''""'-""'""'-'"'""""'~ """""""'"''"""''''''''""''"'""""""-""""'·~"'~·~........._..~~-· -·~~·----~~-~~-·-·-· ..:,_._._.,_oc.·~--·~·.,.,..--·~ ,---'""-">, REGULliili~ - 7 - AUGUST 15th, 1966 REPORTS OF' COJ:.(·JiiTT!~E3 CONTINUED COUNCIL IN COl'lil'JJITTEE CONTINUED COUNCILLOR TRENT asked how information had got in the newspapers prior to consideration by Council, fv!il.YOR DAVIS said he would have to apologize for saying socnething he shouldn't have. COUNCILLOR ILLINGWORTH said that Council had a product to sell and we should accept the best offer. He said he had felt t~:1is way in the first instance, COUNCILLOR TRENT said he felt one bidder had received special consideration and that the others deserved ari equal opportunity. MAYOR DAVIS said he was special consideration. interested bidders. not aware of anyone receiving He hoped we had not lost the C.f..Rl~!ED. MAYOR DAVIS. IN THE CHAIR REEVE f'LTRICK presented a report of Council in Col:lillittee in which the committee respectfully submit the following DRUN!:.GE PROBLEM Council in C01ani ttee met on Monday, July 4, 1966. REE:VE Pf.TRICl~ IN THE CHI:.IR Lll Council present with the exception of Mayor Davis. Llso present was Mr. Rosen, builder of the houses on Kemano Road behind which there is a drainage problem. The Coumittee recommends as follows: That Mr. Rosen be required to carry out the direction of the Town Engineer to correct the drainage problem at the rear of these lots and that a letter to this be sent to Mr. Rosen, ~: =--.=...- ----•--N-~~--~-~-·-·-• >-'--'.0~~~''-·--~---~•••-'--•••-'--"--'•....0.-'---•~---'-C.....:..-'..'-"'-"'--~~~.<<"o<>">.'>'ff=="'-=/•"•'-""~-<\==~~~==·"-=~·""""'-"'~~·'--•-~-~-'·'·"~>.<--~----'~·-----'-~· ---~---~~~~-·- REGULP.R - 8 - AUGU3T 15th, 1966 REPORTS OF COMf>!liTTEES. CONTINU;m COUNCIL IN COMIHTTEE CONTJINUZD PATRICK: TRENT: "Resolved that the report of Council in Co;,lhli ttee, dated .l'.ugust 15, 1966 re drainage problem, Kemano Road be accepted," MilYOR D1WIS read a letter from the Building Inspector relating to this subject, J1ugust 15, 1966 COUNCIL, TO'JJN OF LURORA RE: D~'ttl"INl;,GE! PHOBL~3YJ LT ~~:~iJR OF LOTS 208, 209, 210 1 211 and 212 PLLN 475 NORTH 3IDE OF KSMJ..NO ROJ;.D G:3NTLSMGN: ·;,:Then the permits were issued for these 5 houses, a verbal agreement was entered into with the builder, l\\lr, B. l''l'osen, that the drainage of these lots would be subject to the satis- faction of the Town Engineer, The drainage problem is a lot more severe than at first emticipeJted, as it appears to be a natural water course, draining a large area of property to the west, and seeping throue;h from the J,urora Orchards property, now owned lby Consolidated Building Corporation. Bur fortunately at this stage all the lbase>lwnts are dry. L certain a:,1ount of drainage .nust have been anticipated, wl1en the area was subdivided as a catch basin was situated about on the boundary behind these lots with a stor>n drain running from it to the storm drain on KemEmo ];d. To aggravate the situation the house on lot 209 was in- advertently sited approxiraately 2 concrete block too low. This was caused by the,. sa,~e drainage prololer;1, as the excavation filled ·,·;i th water, and on being pumped out the footings had to be lowered to get to solid ground, this being when the mistake was ;:;ade in siting the house too low. ~,· •-+-···~·--··~-· __ . ___ :,.:...,..._:._•_...:..~~----·--· ·-• ·-~-·-"--' ,_, -·--~~·T='"""'""""'""-''-.~ ·~·"""" t=t.-<==<·~~=W~~·-"·-•·•~· -'-•••---·--·---------~-~·--~------~-N~-~··--- -~ ·····• REGULl:R - 9 - AUGUST 15th, 1966 REPORTS OF COMMI'Jl"r;~ES CONTINUED Mr. Jubb's letter continued For sm;leti~ne after the houses were occupied the rear yards were to soggy to take a aachine to grade the rear y:;,rds correctly, Our Engineer advised they should contour the rear of the yards on all five houses into a shallow but even swail, connect- ing with the catch basin about 2 feet below grade to ensure plenty of fall, there the swail to be fully sodded, 'iie have been ~'dvised by c'lr. Rosen the builder, that the occupant of the house on Lot 209 refuses to let them in with the heavy equipment to accomplish the Engineer's request. As the rear yards are now all so .::ded the equip.llent would ruin it. So l\llr, Rosen promised them he would put in a machine and make the swail to the Eng imler 1 s suggestion, also to re-grade the whole five back yards, for correct drainage and to apply top..,. soil and re-sod the whole five rear yards co~plete, The problem now arises thst tlr, ':t.osen cannot go on this property without their per<nission' which he cannot obtain. eut if the Town insists t:hat the drainage ·,vork has to be done, to the Town 2ngineer•s request, that e letter be sent to this effect to him or his solicitors. '.!'hen they will take the necessary action to obtain entry to the lots, to get the work completed, but without the Towns insistence he claLlls he is staJLe,nated. Mr. Rosen asks this be considerod at your earliest convenience, so the work may be finished. Yours very truly, L.S. JUBB BUILDING: INSPECTOR. DEPUTY-RSE'J:~ sp; ':ONS a-.nid that the builder did not need authority from Council to enter the property. ILLING'!JORTH: "Resolved the:t the Building Inspectors SIUJi\iJONS: letter be forwarded to the Town Solicitor and a report be received by .next Council meeting, --~-"-~-··'--'·--··~·-·~-'--~·~·~·~·-c...·~~~-~-·--.:.~.-·-·~·-·-·-··-·-·-·-· ·-·· -~-~..,.;m._,.""""'""·~~~-~-~"'"..._...._~.._-,~-"-'-"'-·'-""'-'~--·-------· -· ·-· """"-'-------~-...... ~~~ REGUUR -10 -AUGUST 15th, 1966. RE?ORTS OF COi'JffiA!TTEES CONTINU!i:D DEPUTY -H.EEVE SII/Il'AONS Committee in which the ing - presented a report of Council in committee respectfully submit the follow- MUIRHEJill PURCHASER OF BLOCKS £, & B FROM SUNNYBROO! lNVOOT. ~TD. Council in Committee met on Monday, June 27, 1966 DEPU'l'Y :ctEEVE SIM1;10NS IN THZ CHAlR. All Coun. cil were pre~~ftt, with th .• e e .. ~.eptl~~ of Mayo~ De.vis wbo joined the :il~eting at 7: 5Q F .M. SEVERf,L ITEi'.~S !.lso Pl\''3Sent was Mr. H. Conlin, representing lAr. James Muirhead, purchaser of Block [\ and B from Sunnybrook Investments Ltd. · The Committee recommends as follows: That Council in Corcllllittee :ne2t with Mr. Kelner, Mr. Muirhead and their solicitors to thresh out the question of this subdivision at a date to be arranged by i\tlr. Conlin. Sii'iiJ.lAONS: DAVIS: "Resolved that the report of Council in Committee, dated Lug. 15 1 1966 1 be accepted." Ci,u'W Ii5D. COUNCILLOR VJILLIA.Nl30N presented a report of the Planning Commit tee in which the Committee raspectfully sub;:iii t the fol!owing The Committee '"et on Tuesday, July 26, 1966 at 7:30 P,M, J..ll ccletllbers end iVIr. Jubl:J in attendance. The following items were discussed. 1. LBTT:.<:R FHOM D.:!;f'1·:1Ti!T:';NT OF HIGE~UYS :JA'][';:;;D JULY 4, 1966 .., - The above referenced letter adviS·?-S although the Dept. of Highways has no jurisdiction over the section of Yonge St. in front of the Aurora Orchard ?roperty of C •. B.C. it wants to bring to Council's attention that the proposal as approved would • ·• I " ,•-···--.. ··~·,:.v-'""-~-~--~•~--·:,,,. __ ......;.,....:.,._·:.-·-··-··-·-::,..J.,_;_;•~'·""'-~'~"""""'""="'''"'''''''''"'.-•tt.....-~,.-~''""''''""""''"""''~"-'--•'-'--"-'•-..........c'--'·· ~---·--~------------ REGULl'>R -11 -AUGUST 15th, 1966. SEVERJ!,L ITEI>AS ' REPORTS OF COHlA!TTEES CONTINUED PLANNING COMMITTEE REPm"iT CONTINUED (a) (b) Prevent the realigning of the creek and the elimination of the two bridges at Yonge st. and It would be most undesirable for the centre to have direct access onto Yonge St. Your Committee recommends the following: (a) (b) 2. The Town Zngineer meet with C.B.C. and Dept, of :Fiighways officials regarding the realigm,lent of the creek. as outlined in D,H,O. letter and report to Planning Committee. Concur with recOJu;,1endations of D.H.O. that entrance to shopping centre should be from Orchard Road, and no entrance or exist to Yonge Street, GOLF GLZN PETITION The petition dated July 9, 1966 from the Golf Glen Homeowners Lssociation regarding by-law 1692-66 was considered and it is recommended that no action be taken pending O.M.B. hearing. 3_. CORDC REGION.Il.L SEMINAR Councillors Williamson and Murray attended the regional seminar. It was considered a most worthwhile meeting. It is recommended that action be taken to join Coroc, 4. Li!:TTER FROM !JR. J,A, KNOX -CANADH:N i'iliTCHELL ASSOCIATES A letter was received from Mr. J,A. Knox, President, Canadian Mitchell Associates Ltd. dated July 22, 1966 requesting a copy of our standard subdivision agreement by-law. It is recommended ths,t the clerk forward a copy of this by-law as requested. 5, COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT A letter was received from the Committee of Adjustment dated July 4, 1966 regarding the enforcement of Aurora's building by-laws •. This letter was discussed in detail with ~~. Jubb, The Committee was advised that the builders survey is not available until after foundation is laid. Sometimes, the survey is delayed up to 2 weeks and it is difficult to delay the building for that period, due to labour and supply problems. A stop work order would normally be actioned if a serious variation was noted, but it is not felt to be in the best interest of the town to issue a stop work order for a minor variation. ' .. ·~"-·--------,~...,..,..·""'-"·""=''"'"'"·'"'""~.~.~.-. -. -· "' .. 77_,.0_,.7,.,-,-.-. -. ---.-.~,..-.--,-,-c,....,.,...,.,.~ <•·""~~'"""'''''...,.~v.~-··-·-... ,. ...... . '"'''"'"'~'"""'"'·'· ~ '-• .......... ~ .......... ~·-""'""' ~-~~-~.:.. ___ , __ _;___.;.:.;_;_w.:..:..~:..:.:_:_•~-~-..:-,_:..___,_,.:;'_,,_;.:.:.,_•~,-~''•:.o..:.-.:, ....... ,,~ ... ,~'=-=-~"""-·---<.-·~-~-..=~..-."""~T-'--"-'-'-''•~--~---'-"---••-•" •-~·---n------ ;-··.~ ;....._~.~ ' REGULAR -12 -AUGUST 15, 1966. ! REPORTS OF COi\JlMITTEES CONTINUED PLANNING CO!Yll'HTTEE REPO:'!T CONTINUED The Building In&pector is not normally aware of actual measurements until survey has been tak~n when foundations is complete. However, every effort will be made to reduce the possibility of error and the number of applications made to the Committee of Adjustment. Your Committee recommends that a letter be Written to the Committee of Adjustment outlining the abovet and also to request that the planning committee receive notice of all committee of adjustment hearings and decisions. 6. PLANNING BOARD Your Planning Committee is converned that regular meetings of the Aurora Planning Board should be changed without the approval of the Board~ lHLLIAMSON: "Reso,hfed that the report of the ILLINGWORTH: Planning Committee dated August 15 1 1966, be discussed, each item separately, and accepted, as amended. 1. ILLINGWORTH: SIMMONS: 2. CARRIED "Resolved that Clause 1 (b) be amended so that the matter of an entrance to Yonge St. also be studied by the Department of Highways, Town Engineer, and C. }9. C. CARIHED. 3. COUNCILLOR MURRAY pointed out that membership in CORDC would help to avoid the situation, which faced municipalities in the County when Bill 80 was passed establishing Metropolitan Toronto. COUNCILLOR ILLING'.JOR'r:'l! pointed out that he had at the meeting of June 20, suggested that the question of joining be reconsidered. • j ' ' ' I " ,~;_.'-..._..-.;,+.-•:"*'"' ___ . __ __..,_._. -·-• ~·-• ~-·--·-........;_----'--· •-' • ..:.-:.~-· "-•:,_L_..:.M-...-"'-',..!=·="=-=m'<&~X\M, .4~< , , , '"" • oo • ~ N"'"''''"'""''"'·~· -.>.<·"""'-'-"--·-'---'·-· -·-· ··-···--·~•··-----· ----·•·'--·----• REGUUR -13 -AOOU'ST 1~ l966 REPOR'li" OF COMIJITTZES CONT:rfiUEI) PLANNING COMl!l!'.['!EE RIEll?ORT CONTINUED 3. continued MAYOR DAVIS asked what the cost of joining would be to the town. COUNCILLOR ILLINGWORTH said the fee was 8 cents per capita, so it would cost Ajlrora ~bout $800 per ye~. He suggested that Cou!(l~illorLois Han!ey of Richmond Hill be invited to address th~ Coqncil on this subject. COUNCILLOR \ITILLI!IMSON to hear Mrs, 1-Ianley. copies of the address Councillor.· agreed that it would He said also that he given at the Seminar be a good idea had requested for each AiWENDMENT l'i!ILLIAMSON: "Resolved that action be taken to ILLINGWORTH: consider joining CORDC and r,.:Jrs. 4, ' s, CARRIED Lois Hanley be inyited to explain the subject to Council," CARRIED, DEPUTY-REEVE 8H4MONS asked the reason .for delays in receiving the survey. Building Inspector Jubb replied that a plot plan was always obtained but that this did not necessarily indicate the exact location of the house on the lot. CA,':ffi !ED, 6, COUNCI~LOR W]'LLHJilSON advised that this clause resulted from the canqellati.on of a regular meeting and the calling of a special meeting, As a result a quor~!ll was not present. COUNCILLOR MURRAY said that it is the perocative of the head of any committee to call meetinGs arid if the members object they should do so in Committee. ··· COUNCILLOR WILLIAi.\mON said that meetings of the Planning Board are not held, at the call of the Chairman, but are set up in advaru;:e at the beginning of the year. C/I.J~~IED. REPORT AS A''·13NDED CiiRRIED, _,...,.-"'-~--~--·-=-~·· ·-·-······-··· ;-·------~,_.:;M _____ .:.u:..:..:.....:.~~~~.:~ . ...:.... . ....:.-____ ..,.:-'-· ·-·-· ~:.. ..... _,.~-¥....'-,..;.h.~ruo..:.n'""'"',.''''''''"""A~~'*"':_,w ;:s ~~ "''"'"""r=>'""""'"-'""'~"-. ...__~"--'-~'---.,_.__,._~-----~-·~-~-------·-~--~~-~ '-----· I ; I ..__,_ .... REGULAR -14 -AUGUST 15th, 1966 RE?ORT OF COMr.JITTSES CONTINUED PLANNING CD?~Ji'Jl:L.:T:~E 2E?ORT lvE':ETING OF AURORA PLANNING BOJ\RD RE';lUEST RELIEF BY-LA':\1 NO, 1051 COUNCILLOR ·:nLLIAl'tlSON presented a report of the Planning Committee in which the committee respectfully submit the following Councillor Illingworth attended a ;;;eeting of the Aurpra Planning Board on Tuesday, August 9, 1966, at 8:00P.M. Mr. Harold 9eeks, Planning Consultant was in attend&i:lCe• Due to lack of a quorum, the meeting could not be held, and the attending ;,Jeiilbers ;,let with i"lr. Deeks as a Committee. Mr. Deeks outlined the steps necesse:ry for the com;c:Jletion of the official plan and zoning by-law and the approxi.iJate costs the.t would be involved, The next regular meeting of the Purora Planning Boar!l will be held Tuesday, August 23, 1.966 to consider the reco;nmendation as outlined by Iifr. Deeks, ILLINGCJORTH: \''TILLIAMSON: "Resolved thc:,t the report of the Planning Co;;~<;littee, dated August 15, 1966 re meeting of Aurora Planing Board, be accepted." CP.RRIED, COUNCILLO':: :n: .. LINGXGRTH PRZS;'<;NTED a brief re Committee of Adjustment. · The Committee of Adjusti>•ent £Jet on ·;iednesday, f'ugust 10, 1966 to consider a request fro;a i!Jr, 8z Mrs, R.A. Allan, with respect to parts of Lots 38, 39, 40 and 41, Plan 30 Town of Aurora, requesting relief from Town of Aurora By-Law 1051 (as amended) The property, 77 George St. has two variances in the north side yard, a variance of ,50 1 at the north east corner of the building and a variance of 1,04 1 at the north east corner of the building~ ... ~--· ------·~~-_,.........,.,_;..:..:.....~----------·-··-· -· ---·-· ----"-""~--,~=·:.'''''"''"''"'""""'~\""-===· .. ,.,,.,,~.,._=,,-~.,.,,,_ ____ ~--·~-~--'-------·-----~--~ .......... ---~-------"·--"''-~--· -------. REGULAR -15 -AUGUST 15th, 1966, ILLINGVJORTH BlU!:!:F' RE COlWJliTTEE OF fillJUSTrtSNT CONTINUED The house in question was built in 1955 and the variance was brought to Council's attention at that time. As the Comr.1i ttee of Adjustr.Jent was not in existence at that time, Council passed a resolution granting the variance. The resolution is not considered to be valid in point of law, and instead of submitting to Council for an a~~ending By-Law and applicatiqn was r,oade to the Co£,1mittee of Adjustment. 1'\0 \\ ¥(l..t:: \ ll'a ~. -N±ne objections.were JC4l>ri:eooe. The Committee of Adjustment SEVERAL ITEii1S granted the variance as outlined. ,.., IHLLIAJIJSON: IP.ove that the decision of the Committee DAVIS: of Adjustment be acceptable to this Council and no further action taken. CARRIED. COUNCILLOR CORBETT reported verbally that the Town Solicitor had advised hil.l that he would prepare a by-law re control of barking dogs for next Council meeting. COUNCILLOR DAVIS re;oorted that Pierre Thibault had advised th&t the fire truck.would be ready for delivery by the end of August. COUNCILLOR TRENT presented a report of the \"Jorks Committee in which the Cor:,;li ttee reE;pectfully submit the following The Committee ;Jet on Tuescky, August 2, 1966 to open tenders for the supplying of bitumuls RS -1. Two tenders were received as follows: CANA'JIAN 3HUiiULS CO. LTD, W. A.. RYD8R :? A'JING LTD. 20, 4 ¢ GALLON PICK'<:JJ UP 22.5 GLLLON '.'-~·-~~-~---~,......:. __ ~:...1~'-'~··_..:·~·~· ~ _______ ,_,___._;_.:..:_~·~"-'~""''~-~-·~~~""""""=-=..-~ '"''''''""'''''''"''''"''''===·--·~·· -~~---··-··--~-···----·___.,_,_,____,_,_, _______ ~------ ;..,..,:_..~ REGULAR -16 -AUGUST 15th, 1966 SEVERAL ITEMS RE?C.1iTS CF C01AllMITTEES CONTINUE~D COUNCILLOR T;;r~NT 'i ... ~rottKS COl\\lf&I'rT~~E ~R::I:POF~T CONTINUED The Committee therefore recm<J,.;ends the:t the tender of Can.o,dian Bitu;,mls Co. Ltd. be accepted at 20.4¢ gallon. 2. On the advice of the Superintendent the committee reCOii'<'ilends that an engineering study and report be made on the swimming pool to deter;Jine the source of surfe.ce water running from the swisrilming pool area. 3. Cowmittee recorol~lemlls that a policy be established that we share the cost of re;:.oving diseased elm tree with the mwners of private property at the rate of 50% to be paid by property owners and 50% paid by the ~.mnicipality. Those persons wishing to take advantage of this offer should contact the works superintendent. 4. Re Mr. Hepple 1 s property on Larmont ,3t. The Co,amittee recommends that our solicitor be instructed to prepare an easement agreeii1ent for the placing of drainage tiles on Hr. Hepple's property. TRENT: P 1'-.TRICK: 1. CA?JRIED 2. CA.i~RIED "Resolved the.t the report of the 1iJorks Committee, dated August 2, 1966 re several ite;:.s, be accepted as a<;;ended and the seal of the corporation be attached hereto." 3. CGUNCILLOi: ILLING;'/ORTH said a time lii.!i t should be placed on this offer so that tirce trees can be "1arked. COUNCILLOR DAVIS suggested the:t the extent of the offer should be lir.Ji ted by the budget for tree remove!. COUNCILLOR ILLING\'!ORTH sdd tbat it might be possible to nm:1ber the r-8quests as they cm"e in ,nd to remove them in order until the budget is exhausted. COUNCILLOR ~HLLJI:i}iJ'3QN disagreed. He felt it is more i;nportant to destroy tr,ees tl1at are being rimJaged by the beatle rather then those where the da~~1age has been done and the beetle moved on. ,__...__,~~·-.··--""~""'·-·--~~:.:"~-~--·~~··---·-.:..~-·-· ~--:..:.-'-'-"~"''"'-~'-"'~-.,.__,,.,_.,._~;,_,.,===t="'""~"""''''"'''''''""'"'"'-~==-7-'<'.~~··'-'~~~~""-~·"-~·'····-------··---·-------------'-~--'~"'--'------..----~·---~ .. '---·'"" REGULJJR -17 -hUGUST 15th, 1966. REYOR~r OF COI;4Iv.!ITT~:~S CONTINUED CCUNCILlLO~ TR.~r~T · .. ,-~TDRJ\S CO?;llVJITTL~E ::~S:.::o:iT CONTIN£.J:~D Al/.!:ZNDl:rlENT ILLil\!G\'lORTH: "Resolved thc,t the recommendation TRENT: be clic1ended by adding "to be done under the \'linter Jorks programme as far as the budget will per~it and that those wishing to 4, PATRICK: SI?:&f,10NS: take advantage of the offer must contact t~e Town Superintendent by Sept e:aber 30, ClRRIED. "Resolved that the clause be a•.,ended to add the words "and other affected properties.!' REPORT A.S llNJLND.2D P.DOPTED. CGUNCILLOR T'1SNT presented a report of the Works Committee in which thz Committee respectfully submit the following VARIOUS ITEMS 1, That Mr. E.A. McGregor be paid a weeks wages in lieu of overtime, 2. In view of the e;~.ergency calls 11nd the established practice in surrounding co"'mmni ties, the committee recommend the•t the Town Superintendent be accorded the privilege of l:eeping the Town of Aurora vehicle assigned to him at his residence in off hours. TRENT: PATRICK: "Resolved that the report of the Works Committee be adopted.'' MAYOR DJ:.VIS said that since Claus·e 2 involved a Town employee it should be discussed in Committee. ILLINGWORTH: SII!!MONS: "Resolved that Cl<mse 1 be discussed to-night and Clause 2 be held over to be discussed in Committee. Cf~IRI~~D. CLA1L3)~ 1 CAARIED. ---'-'-~-•~'·~·-~-·-·--,·~, . .:_:__._....;____~·._.~,-----C:___;_,~.,_:_;_;.__;~L~--rn..m..V.•~-==-'-"=<<>.~~·==--=-':•'C")'O!''""'""''""'""'-'"~·k~-=-.:_.•-'•-'-'-~·.-'--'----'-·---'-•----------'-----·---'-·•-------'-•-•--· -'--~-~-•~'---•- r l L--~ ~~~--~ ~ l-1EG2NCY A.CJ:t~S REGUU'R -18 -AUGUST 15th, 1966. REPORT OF COMMITTEES CONTINUED CDUNCILLOl:t TR~NT reported he had received the report of the Town Sngineer on the H.egency !ceres drainage problem SUBDIVJWION OPEN WATER COURSES This report deals with the problem of open ditches through the ,::egency Acres Subdivision. ;?roperty owners etdjacent to these watercourses have for some time complcdned of gradual movement or sloughing of the earth banks which causes the soil on private properties to illOve and displace sod, fencing and other fixtures near the property line. A further source of complaint is t::2e uncut grass and debris which accumule.tes in the ditches, rats have been seen in the 'Natercourses. Corrective Ivleasures: On first glance it would seem a simple but expensive prol:Jle:~ to totaJU.y enclose the watercourse 11'i thin the subdivision. However the cost of such an under- teking could exceed $45,000.00. An al terne.te to the above would be a solid maintenance program with a re2sonable smoJ allotted in 1967 to repair and straighten fencing, rip-rap and sodding along with an annual schedule of grass cutting and clean up during the summer months. The sloughing of the banks is ;;;ost evident in the Jones Court area, however, we can see no evidence of da;:iage to houses or buildings in the are.sc. Fencing and the lack of maintenance of these we.tercourses seem to be the most serious problems. Recommendation: That a maintenance schedule be drawn up by the Superintende~t of Works covering gr&ss cutting and debris and that ' the suJl of $1 1 500.00 l:Je allocated in the 1967 Budget for the straightening and repair of fencing and rip-rap in these watercourses. The etbove is respectfully submi·:;ted. Yours very truly, J.D. Reid. ---·-·--·----.. ---.-. .~-··~-"--~--·-·~·~..:..__•.-J..,,;_.", ___ ,_. __ ~---·-~·~-~.>-'-' -~-~-~---·~--~="-""'•"'~-"'~' ~=;,=~~'"""'-"'=<>-=>'-=<==--~~·~·---.......0-.~------~~~·~>--,-•-V~~·"'~"··~="~'OVN'~._._._~ REGULP.R -19 -AUGUST 15~ 1966., REPORTS OF COiWAITTEES CONTINUED SHED CJ.T;r,rffiiNE & SPRUCE MUNICIPAL AIR PORT ENGIN··sER 1 S I!EPORT R.E R3G:~NCY OPSN .}ilT'211 COURSES THE WORKS COi'1RHTT2E recommend that in future the Planning Board must never agedn permit homes to be built this close to a watercourse. COUNCILLOR TRENT reported on the Engineer's report re Toronto and York Roads Commission on Yonge & i!ellington Traffic lights. UNFINISHED BUSINESS MAYOR DLVIS reported he had observed the shed at Spruce and Catherine St. being painted. COUNCILLOR ILLING\IORT!H! said that the shed 1:ras to be taken down as a condition of issuing the permit. MAYOR DAVIS said also the·t trees were to be planted as a screen. COUNCILLOR 'HLLIMASON said that this property had been an eyesore for years and now Council is raising cain when the owner is trying to improve it. COUNCILLOR 'IHLLIJ:Ti1GON referred to minutes of :~revious Council '"'eetings regnrding the establishment of a Municipal Airport. He and Councillor Davis were to attend a ;,leeting to discuss the subject but the meeting had been cancslled by Mayor Kent of NewmarkGt and nothing had been heard since. COUNCILJLOH ILLING'i'ORTH said that i!.urora must grow industry wise and an e,irport would help. This has been proven in other r.mnicipali ties. He doesn't think we should let the matter drop just because other municipalities ·ion 1 t follow up. Let us look into the feasibility and cost. We should travel to Oakville and other municipalities which operate airports. ~~~--~~YO"n-·-·-·-~-'-'--·-·-· ·---~-----··--"----~-·A------·-·--"''~""""'""'' '' ""··=-=,._,.,,.,.~"""""""'"'"'"""""'"""""""''==,...~-··""""'.__..' ____ ._, ------'--·~·~---~--h.~·-~-·~----- REGULAR -20-AUGUST 15, 1966, UNFINISH:W BUSIN3SS CONTINUED RE lHRPORT CONTIN1JED LOUERING BY-U.W ILLING~I:'ORTH : .!liLLIJJ.~SON: "Resolved that a com,";Iittee of this Coun~il study the airport question and bring in a report on the feasibility of locating an airi;)ort." COUNCILLOi't ·;n:LLHlvlSON pointed out that the minutes of February 28 call-ed for a study of a rJunicipal Heliport and suggested the smae Cm;Jmittse ;;light look into both questions. · R3EVE PP..TIHCK said an airport was a good idea, but Council should pay ettention to Town business before running around looking at airports. COUNCILLOR lJ1URRAY said there is nothing vrrong with the resolution. A study would not cost anything except a bit of mileage, C.LI£RIED • . MAYOR :,JAVI3 said that he ~vould ail.d two names to the original com~Ilittee CSUNCILLOS; ILLING:?ORTH presented a brief as follows: Reference is made to minutes of Council dated October 18/65, when a reCOJiiJ;;endation was received that a by-law be prepared to prohibit loitering within the town, and this report we,s a;:Jended to read thct the Police Dept. be instructed to enforce the law rege:rding loitering under the Criminal Code, The Police Committee in th·air report dated lt1arch 21/66 page (U.) again considered the intro:'iuction of a by-law but were e.dvised by the Chief of Police that a by-lnw was not required as loitering was cov.ared under Section 160 <•) of the Cri;;iinal Code. Once ngtdn the :?olice Dept. were instructed to enforce the law regarding loitering, under the Crit<linal Code, C---~·-·~---·~-~-~~_;_;_'-'-'--,.;_-~,-•••-·-'-'----'----·-·-·--'-'-<~•+<.-M<<>C~---~-'T=>>>=e,-,=.=-""""~--==.0=~· ~"""-'-'"'~'=<O~'='"'''"-""-"'-'=~·==~-~~~-'-~~---~~··~·-·...._,__. ___ <••~-"--~--·-·~~-~---·--------......, r '----~~ c" REGUL/;R -21 -LUGUS'lr 15, 1966. UNFINISHED BUSIN3GS CONTINUED ILLINGVIORTH BRIZF R2 LOITZRING CDNTINUSD This summer, possibly becc:use of the w.s-r~n weather, the problem of loitering on Yonge St. has intensified to the extent the:t some of the townspeople &re concerned and rightly so, In some cases, the language and behaviour of the loiterers are an ei,Jbarrassment to ladies, wl"o are required to pass. This is not a criticism of our Police Dept, who with the lir:Ji ted resources at their disposal are endeavouring to provide police protection for a tov"llz of 10 1 000 people, On so;01e shifts, only one constable is on duty und it is a impossibility for him to be ~;verywhere. However, the Police Dept. h2ve been instructed th2t action must be taken to clear up the loitering si tuE.tion on Yonge St, ·c~e noH find out from our ?olice Chief, that officiers can only a:rrest without warr&nt only if you see (or hear) the offence taking place, and can only act otherwise on a co;.--..~plaint, provid::_ng the person vlhto lays tha complaint will e.ppear as a witness etc. It is quite evident thEt tho provisions of the Criminal Code as they apply to Aurore: is not sufficient to cle&r up the deteriorating si tu;c.tion within the toiYn and thc:t oth2r action raust be taken. The Town of Georgetown recently passed em Anti-Loitering By-Le.vJ which was upheld by the Court. Ti:e r~agistrate said at that time "You were testing the officiers and the new l:Jy-lnw, and as e result you are in court now. You were warned several tii<Jes to ;nove on, and there was no reason ~J~rhy you didn 1 t. 11 I. re:.1uest hs.s been submitted to the TovJn of Georgetown for a copy of their by-la~1 so that it :Jlay be studied and C)Ossibly im;,Jle;;Jented. In the ·~•eenti,;le the ?olice Dept. have been instructed to issue vmrnings to loiterers to ;;;ove on, so thct our stra.:;ts ,,;ay be kept clear for the purpose for •.which they were intended. However, the Police Chief feels that this is against the le..w and refuses to t;c,ke this action. ----~·-'-··-·-~~"--'~-·----"""""""'-........_.~ . ..;.~·~-~-·-· -·~· --~~''"''''"'''""""'''''"''"'""''"''''''''''"''''"""'~''"""''""'"'''''''-~~''""'="="~""·'· =~~-·--------~-~~-·--" ................ "'"'~....._,~.~--"'·-·-·- r - .............. l. .. -t REGULAR -:-22 :-ic.UGUST 15, 1966. LETTER RE BRIDGE TYLER ST. UNFINISH::ID BUSINESS CONTINUED ILLING;,;roRTH BRI:S.I'' CONTINU;~D RE LOIT:<:RING ~: :, ;,:_ . We have heard and read a great deal recently about the village of Franlicford, in which the one "''an force resigned, because he didnot have the support of some members of the Council and as a result there has been :u11my editorials and comi•1ents about the problem of s;nall town policing in Ontario, and I quote froJ;J <m editorial in the Globe & D~ail. · ''Small police units are notoriously vulnerable to the foibles of local big-wigs who can, if they chose, make life iidserable for ah unco-operative police chief. Law enforcement, however, is not ·something to be ' molded to .;1eet local business needs or the exigencies of village politics.'' Speaking personally, and I hope for ell members of this Council, I can assure the Police Chief and the Police Dept. of my support in enforcing the laws of the town, the province and the Country, but I feel this a11eans all the laws and not just the lmws selected by the Police Dept. Norliile.lly, a proposed by-law is brought in as a recomrJendation of a Committee. In view of the seriousness of this situation, and the proble;,J of arranging a committee meeting, I request your indulgence in introducing a by-law to prohibit loitering and re:j~uest that any discussion be during second reading of the By-Law, COUNCILLOR TR::<:NT reported on a letter received from Mr. L.K. Bennett, re the bridge on Tyler St. He advised that his committee were agreed thc-ct a fir:.1 offer had been r.;ade iY'.r. Bennett and nothing further need be done. -:' -'· -~-' i,-._r. ::.:~. ·.~ ~-~,:.:'!· ··-···-~~--·· ~-~--~"'-'-•"'"'~-·'•-'-'--'-'--'-'•'·'~"--~-----·-~-.,-•-'-~'-·-~""'---·M~'-"~~-=="7.~"-~.,.--"=-=:•~'-==-'===~'>~~."''''"=•M,~-~-'"•"A~~~~~~=-~~-,..,,~,,~,--••--•~•~-----"'-••-•••-••.•~~-----•-·-·--- I \ 1,1 ~;> REGULJ:.R -23 -AUGUST 15, 1966, CROSS 'HALKS -----·- UNFINISHi!:D !3USINi!:SS CONTINUED ILLINGi?ORTH BRIEF RE LIGli!TS LT YONGE & '<'!ELLINGTON COUNCILLOR ILLINGWORTH presented a brief re the lights at Yonge&Wellington No doubt ><le.ny of you read an article in the Telegram column "Lction Line" dated August 11/66 in which 1\!Jr. B ,l'?.. Toronto comt~1ents about the traffic lights at Yonge I?< 'ilellington St. and concludes his remarks. "That was a year ago, the light is still the same, and I wouldn't be surprised if the police:Jen is still standing on the corner." Well, there is no doubt tbe lights are sti.l.l the same. This :aatter has been pending since early 1965, and although tenders were a)proved last Lpril for the equip:;1ent, still no action has been taken. rAinutes of Council dated June 20/66 (page 9) outline the discussion that took place at that tilile, and it was felt that action would have to be delayed until approval was received fror.:~ the County. It is interesting to note in ~t,r, J, Rettie's letter dated July 22/66 that even the County and the Toronto York Roads Commission are not infallible, as the County has no jurisdiction over the intersection, but i& a liJatter between the ;)ept~ of Highways and ourselves, May we ask when action is going to be tal,en or will Mr. B.R. of Toronto have to write again next year. i\iiAYOR DJWIS reported that all the required equip;.1ent had not yet been received, COUNCILLOR YriLLii.MSON referred to the Committee which was to be established to study cross-•-valks on '1Yellington Street. COUNCILLOR ILLING,!OHTH asked that a follow up letter be sent to the Depart;;lent of Transport regrurding jurisdiction over County roads, He asked also that the Engineer report on any '"eetings held with Toronto & York Roads Co;nmission. · , , "'---""'-"""'''',.;.;..:..,_~=L• •-. .....,_~~---.~·~<--~"'''"'~'-''c ,• < --- -·--·····-««••----~~ .. ----·--"·-"·--------~--,.·--~~--~~ ·~·-~-·--'•-'-'--'-"-----,~~-·-·--~···-~-·----------~---- i;i i .! I I REGULf.R -24 -AUGUST 15, 1966, '._.-,.~ BUiCK TOPPING SIDE WLLKS. , __ ,_ DUTCH ELM DISEASE UNFINISHED 3iJE.INESS COUNCILLOR DJ:,VIS raised the question of the deplorable conditions of the sidew&lks on Yonge Street. He felt that they should be blacktopped now, DlcVI3: ILLING7ffORTH: "Resolved thc.t the Yone;e 3t. sidew<?;lks be blacktopped froGJ Church St. to the JJ&~.ry." COUNCILLOR ILLINGWDl~'fH said he hoped that bladrtopping would not stop there but be extended southerly. MLYOR Dl.VIS said thc:t he felt th&t a study should be made regarding costs, etc. COUNCILLOR 7ILLIJJ;}30!1l said the:t the study should include the use of epoxy bonded to cett1ent. COUNCILLO;;t TRENT said in ;,1any areas there is only dust and no ce;:Jent to bond, ll<.l\1.~ND1·.~~!;NT SI~>fMONS: "Resolv:';d tlwt the Superintendent check Yonge 3treet e:nd c;et a cost on repairs as required by b1ackto,;Jping. " co;mzTT: Ci;RRISD. CCUNCILLOR ·?ILLIN•lJO!Il said the study should also include the cost of repairing with epgxy, TRENT: i\lliRRAY: •.' "Resolved that .,.~~~~~~ be appoi11ted an inspector under the Plant Diseases Jkt, RSO, 1960 Chp 297 as amended by Stntutes of Ontario, 1964 chp. 91 & Reg 485 be appointed at the salary of$ ••••• to inspect trees suspected· of being effected by Dutch Elm disease, ILLINGi•lORTH: "!~esol ved that the words "that a Sii'C>10NS: by~law be prepared" be added to the resolution. AM2:NDiENT Ci-~J.>mi::ID CJ-l!::iRIED .L~"G tlAENDED • /_,.....,-.-~-~-·-------·~~~--~~:-~~='-'.._,..,_,=,,.._..-r_,•--'~~--'-~~...,.,-.="-"·'"'-"..--=-<:= . .._..,_:~·-•T,<-r-"""""~· ~. ?_,..~.,..?~~.--' .;.· •. -~;;~=Y''-~"f">"'>~·--..~~~-- '·,___--,--' ''""' REGULAR -25 AUGUST 15, 1966 UNFINISHED BUSINESS CONTINUED BY LAlli 1670 RE SIGNS RE BUS STOPS COUNCILLOR Ml.JR211Y raised the Matter of By-Law 1.670. He pointed out thnt in many instnnces the signs could be placed on hydro po];es 1 but the present standcrds are on the wrong side of the roc.d. COUNCILLOR ILLINGWORTH said that this was to be discn"<:':JJl by Council in Committee. nnd h~iJ hoped the '"eeting would be held soon. MAYOR DAVIS advised the meeting would be held on Tue""·<; , J',ugust 16. · · COUNCILLOR ILLING\'!ORTH presented a brief on bus stop.~ Reference is' made to minutes of Council dated Moy 16/t:S (page 11) in which, your Police Committee reported on Gray Coach l3qs stops in J';u;rora and to minutes dated June 6/66 (p);J.ge 3) regarding signs for the bus stops and it was hpped to start new policy June 23 for a tlaJ!'')c., month trial period~ 1l petition has been reviewed from Gray Coach Bus Coumv:t<:'':;- regarding t!le west side stop at. Centre St. Prior to receipt of this petition, action had been started to locate a i;JOte suitable stop, based on a suggestion from Councillor l\#urray. The remarks in the petition regarding this stop were felt to be valid, and action has been taken to relocate the stqp closer to (1!ellington st. bu·t; still leave room for traf*'ic flow makiQg a r.ight hand turn at ~;'ellington. The petitiop. also notes the difference in location of tL::c, bus shelter~> erected las{ year and the bus stops approved this year at· Regency J}cres and f,urora Heights. It is quite evidep.t when the bus shelters were erected that no consideratipn was given tq traffic condition, as they are locGte(! right at the corner, The location of the bus stops were pl.s:ced in such a way as to leave an unobstructGcc view· of the· intersection and the traffic lights at the intersectiop.. . No action had been planned u.Qtil the expiry of the 3month trial period, which is approximately mid Septe•:.ber. However, prior to this date,· it is re- quested thet Council cont;;;!.der what action is to be take"'l lllove the shelter to the but;; stop, or i.loye the bus stop to the shelter. This subject will be reported upon at the mid September meeting~ · · •• :_·,:.: . .':. •..,................... ''-•""~~ . .,.~~~~~~:;:-,•,•,:""';~~.~":"=o .. "•'-"••"•••~~o·~-·-'''''<-•,.•-•-·~'• • -'•''-t'·~-.. --• ---~--·• ,-'-' ~~~---.....:..:.. .... -:..-'-'..--------' , ---' '-' -----·~""'~"""'~'""""""~== '""'·""-R""-'~--·'·--·-----~·--·~····--·._..~-~~o.~>~-·A·-~----- j ''"'' I , ___ _ TOILE'll'S TO\liTN PJ~KS BY-L!Si 1698-66 LOITERING PUBLIC PLACE '-~ REGULAR ~ 26 -_AUGUST 15 1 1966, UNFINISEHD BUSIN!_i:SS CONTINUED COUNCILLOR DAVIS said that the Town toilet$ are in extremely bad l'!ituation because they are locked most of the time, The Recreation Committee would like to have them open at least while functions are going on in the afternoon and evening, DEPUTY-REEVE SHM'110NS said thect he had ordered the toilets locked because of leek of supervision. DAVIS: "Resolved that the toilets in the ILLINGWORTH: Town Par It remain open for afternoon and night activities. SJJ:kt~,~10NS: \HLLH.MSON: DEFEJ;.TED. "Resolved that the above matter be referred to the Property Committee and that they be authorized to re-open the toilets if a solution can be found or report bat:k to Council. Cf:RJ.'UED. ILLINGVJORTH: "Resolved thE:t the meeting carry on CORBETT: to the hour of 11:15 to discuss by-law 1698-66. CJ,.R..'UED. BY-LAVf 1698-66 ·-...,~ ·~ ,,. '-"' . ' ' ., ·-. -·---,,-, The By-Law was read a first time CORBETT: ILLINGWORTH; 2nd reading "Resolved that leave be given to introduce a By-Law to prohibit loitering in a public place and that the s&.le be now read a first time. TRENT: "Resolved that the by-law now before the DLVIS: Council be read a second time and that the Council resolve itself into a committee of the whole for that purpose. .. ---... ~~---0..:""--'-•~-,:...... •. , --~·"'·=~-.-_,.,,._",' ,., _.,-.~---,-, .• --,o.--o~co· ···-·····-· '"'~··r··-•c-..,----· ········~-., •. ._ ',., • ''' '' ·--.. ~·-··· ;t.·· -· ' --·~'·--•-"'c""-•~-~-~~~-· .... ~ ... ·~-~~~~.,~~~ -~ ... ,.,,,,,,.,.~ ... =-~-~-~~=-~-"-..... ~~---~-----~----~-~--~------------------·--·----·---., REGULAR -27 -AUGUST 15, 1966. BY-LAW #1698-66 continued LOITERING PUBLIC PLLCE COUNCILLOR iiiilJRR;,y said we are not solving the problem we are having because these people are not on public property. They are standing on private property. .,.,.. COUNCILLOR ILLINGVIORTH said that in that be charged under the Petty Trespass Act. Solicitor says there would be no harm in test case, case they could The Town bringing in a REEVE PATRICK said that the Police could go into a public place without being called in, MAYOR DLVIS said be fe!'f tli~ by-law is a step in the right direction. · DEPUTY-REEVE SI~~ONS said he felt it was just another piece of paper we are passing because the Police will not enforce it~ COUNCILLOR ILLINGWORTH ;;aid that if the Police cannot enf,'orce the by-law we JJUst get police who will. 'iYe must find out if the Council or loiterers are running our Town. COUNCILLOR iY~RHAY said he felt the By-Law is a step in the right direction, 2ND READING Cf~~RIED. T!URD JRELDING WILLIAMSON: "Resolved that the by-law now before the PATRICK: Council be read a third time this day and that Rule 22 of By-law No. 1468 be suspended for that purpose." PATRICK: "Resolved that third reading be taken as COR3ETT: read." Ci:.V~1~IED • THIRD REW!NG ClillRIED. ;nLLIMiiSON: "Resolved that the ,;,eeting adjourn." CORBETT: /1~ <J "vJJ~ -~,~~-'C/~--~-~~---~-~~----------~--~- MAYOR CLERK ···-·--·--· ·--.. ~---~-~···-·------~·~~~ --"'':,co·~·,_-":o:=-"-=':-=:• .•:'>. c:,;;,::,·o·..co:"io= ""-':-~~ ._., ~--.~---"-·-·~--.;:.;.;. .. ~ ;-\' i;;. ~"1~ . -~ :{',· \ . ·--~,-~.-.. --"-~-~ -~----.-, · AUG 1s 1966 to · -· ·-~= ""9~.:: ... ., Seconded by z;; d/lJ~ That th'C following accounts be paid, that the Mayor issue orders on the Treasurer for the··-same and the Seal of the Corporation be attached hereto. WATER ACCOUNT Aurora Hydro Electric Aurora Cash-Way Electric Aurora Power Equipment D.L, Bassett Ltd, Bell Telephone Harold Billings · Canadian Tire J.H, Chapman North York Heating, Plumbing Emco Ltd. Gift & Greeting Studio Grinnells Sales Hughes-Clivens Co. Ltd. Service 722, 57; Billing 654,80 Meter Reading lbi.34/ Repairs on #3 pump T.ension wire & repairs on small pump Fuse links Service Repairs @ Yonge St. Pumping Station · · ·· 1,478 •. 7~ 40,70 ? 7.82/ 33,61/ 12,81/ 22,67 / Saw blades & screw drivers 4,47/ Clamps, cutting bolts & drilling flange 34.90/ Galvized pipe, couplings tees, threads, clamps 3 hydrants Ink for graphs Socket clamp assembly, service 72.90/ 683,55/ .79/ saddle, oain_ stops, gate valves union couplings, plugs & sleeves ' 751 .• 98 / Red & Green recording ink for graphs TOTAL Carried .. ·.-_-_,_._. ~,27 / 3,152,18 r--'-'~--'-"'-~--->=-~'~·~--~->.<=--<-•,_..-"~~--" _,._ .,o'>·~'·" .~~~~~~·~· ~~ . .,.~~-=~r -=--""=t..·~·""'="="::="~~·C.:.:•._.:_ ... ~· .. c:.:..~,---~"--"'~··'-~ .. · -~,, .. :.--. .:..·_...~;:,.;~.,-· ·-···"M""" ·-o-"~-'·""'"'----··-I· I !, Moved by •.. ~:;=:(~~ That the following accounts be paid, that the Mayor issue orders on the Treasurer for the same and the Seal of the Corporation be attached hereto. GENERAL ACCOUNTS Aurora Banner Publishing Aurora Hydro Electrci Aurora Track Club Banner Printing Bell Telephone Co, R, Brill Dean Dunlop Gestetner of Canada Gift & Greeting Studios International Business Blfachines Morning Drugs Ontario Municipal Board J, D. Reid & Associates R. C, Sanderson Taylors Fuel Western Assurance Wilkinson Sword Ltd, Xerox of Canada TOTAL Advt-Tax Instalment, Civic Holiday and Maps St, Lighting Trophies Committee of Adjustment Paper Service Offic.e 100.49 _ Bldg,.' Insp. 17.02 ..__ Canine Contr.ol Audit Fees -August Paper Office Supplies Bldg Inspector Ribbons, Carbon paper &Typing element 1.51 ~ d.§.- Film-Bldg Inspector Application Fees for Education Capital Aid Program School Site Planning By-Law 1692-66 Retainer Fee;. ,July .··· . 39.2.0 -- 1,208.68- 75 .oo,.__ 13.11_ 117.51 365.33-..__ 290,00- 58.91- 1.77 37.15 ' 4.25- 227,00- 364.53- Processing Committee of Adjustment Application 22,18- 446.25-Gasoline Group Accidnet insurance & additional automobile Sword in Case Rental & Copies ~2 Carried --··--. 106.00- 69.08- 43.63- $3,489.58 ~ ....... , r-·--·~··'"""''=--~-=~---" -~'=-·--=-<->o..,..,<~~-~-~-·~-~ ""-'=·--====•r-~•·•·my=•-'-'E~-·~<""=~·=;o~~"=,----""''"-'~~-•--· ~· ·,~-··~·,; __ ._. ·--~~--~~~·'--··-~;..;;,),,,-.-:,~ .. ,., .. '----~·......: ~f- lJfl~ 1 .... .., rt: ~lil"tr> .J 01!'1)1) -·., ")~~ 2:= .....:..: 'hj9l!~ That the following acc6unts be paid, that the Mayor is sue orders on the Treasurer for the same and the Seal of the Corporation be attached hereto. WORKS ACCOUNTS Armitage ConstructionCo, Attridge Lumber Co. Aurora Automotive Ltd, Aurora Power Equipm~nt Aurora Hydro Electric Banner Printing K,J, B(l-amish Construction Beaver Lumber Co, Bell Telephone Co, Brooklyn Concrete Products Buchanan Cartage Ltd, Canada Bolt & Hook Co. Canadian Tire Corporation J.H. Chapman Corrosion Service .!)avis Garage L. Fowler Esso Gift & Greeting Studios Gormley Sand & Gravel W, Gunn Hands Tire Sales Miller Paving Co, Natale Bros Paving National Chemsearch of Can Newmarket Spring Service O.M. Industrial Service Owl-Lite Equipment P.c.o, Service Ltd, King Seagrave Ltd, Sleassor Motors Taylors Fuel Westeel-Rosco Wilson Hardware TOTAL Industry St. Paving(l965) Cement & Seal Bond Batteries, Wipers, Grease a!).d Plugs Repairs to truck wiring 5 '59 5. 50 ---8.61, Fittings 51. 82, 44.09 - Service 10.13- St, Sewers 34.55- Work on Traffic signals & Crosswalk Signs 640.64 .__ Oiling Signs Cold Mix Lumber for Fence Service Catch Basin & Instal Same Pavingramp per agreement Broom Handles 685.32 13.35-- 62.36 ~ 86.75- 39.01, 45.79 "- 350,00_ 3.15 ~ 28,43---nt!ud Flaps, Tire·& Filter Cutting culverts, rep!l.iringinowers and sanders 28,08--. Repairs to Fisher M-Scope Tirl3 Repairs Tire Repairs Pens & Pencils Pit Run and Sand 10 Lb, Galv, Steel Bent Tractor Tire and tube Asphalt Prime Paving parking lot Paving of sidewalks Traffic Paint 1849.00, 60U.31-.. Installing springs Anti-Seize Compound Batteries on #5 Pest Control Repairs to Sander Grease & Oil change #3 Grease cartridges Traffic Signs Plugs & Bulbs 26,.30-. 1.50- 2,00_ 1,45- 184.15- 7.20- 29.67- 3,388.82- 7 ,890. 31 38.19- 164.07- 34.65- 44.45"- 12.00- ' 83.50- 10.88- 3.68--- 432.92- .93~ $19,398.93 \ ... Carried )!Pf". ' !.,., AUG · 1"' t('»~ ,<uu u '[~ , <~ ~q uu<l9 =-~.,~~=:·::.:::= . ..::: .. ~C:~2::, - of the Corporation be attached here~o. · POLICE ACCOUNTS Aurora Power Equipment Auro.ra Hydro Electric Baldwin's Pharmacy Banner Printing Bell Telephone Co, Harold Billings Binions M tors Canadian ~ire Corporation Central Office Supply J,H, Chapman C,N, Telecommunications L. Fowler's Esso Red Gordont s Garage Leo MacNeik' s Esso Olive.tti Underwood Ltd. Row• s Gunn Shop' Sunshine Uniforms Wilson Hardware Petty Cash TOTAL Generator Service Pictures Envelopes, Forms Office Phones Staff Phones Hose Clamp & Valves Service on Cruiser 55.17-. 37 .84_ Spotlight and Gas Can Servicing T,ypewriter & Office Supplies Welding angles in cruiser trunk Tel ax Service cruiser washes Align Front Wheels Cruiser wash Service for year ~unition & Target grips Months supply of smocks cutting keys Meals Mise • Mileage ~~ Carried " 22,00 1.80 21,00 367 .45--.. 22 .91.. ... lO.Ol_ 162. 63~ 93, Ol 8.83- 55.86- n;87-. 17.93- 5.63~ 45.00_ 35.68~ 10.50_ 1,00- 38;15- 13. 63- 15,75- .74~ 44.80' $961,38 , u«' u • u i~·;' ~ -~-..) Moved by~. / _Second~~---·~:~~~jf)f-- That the following accounts be paid, that the Mayor is sue orders on the Treasurer for the same and the Seal of the Corporation be attached hereto. POLLUTION CONTROL CENTRE ACCOUNT Attridge Lumber Co, Aurora Automotive Ltd, Aurora Cash-Way Aurora Hydro Electric Baldwins Pharmacy Bell Telephone Co, Binks Mfg. Co, Canadian Dust Control .J,H. Chapman Davis Garage H, Graham Ltd, O.H, Johns Glass Co, Ltd, North York Heat & Plumb Wilson Hardware Lumber for cassa for tests Bearing & brake fluid Service call on heater Service Chemic ls for tests " Service Brass nozzles Cleaning SUPJ?lies Welding bracket & sump pump Repairs to tanker truck Delivery charges Junior centrifuge Galv Pipe threads bus~ing & tees · Months supplies ~(~ Carried 64.23'---. 3,76 ...... 4.00- 325,47~ 10.00- 17.85- 17.06- 3,00- 39,90-- 138.00- 25.30-. 64,77- 18.14- 109,69_ 841.17 \ T .-~~' •,~·,,·~--·,c,-'?~,,',?o-.•-~o-.-'-' • ' ' -i, ~-.;...>--->-'-" "-"'·---..:.....:..:...'-...:...;_:_.,_;..;.,...:..:.,,_,_~,__,;,_~-·~~'-"~•7.}""'•'·"*""0>"';,o:>;!_<(~>,;U,~>'~W.W.~i"'•€o=.O'•,< ·-~,=="'l""-':OC«,~-">='W' ''•'"-·"-~"<"•'' •-"';~_<:<o-"'-'--.M'-L'-.-'-'-·---C-',.,._,_,,,, __ ~,_~,·-~~_.,,;,_;,t~.,O,'.--~---•··~-• '""""""-~<.~•----.- ~>:" Moved by 7l:j/bt!Jt..v ~--~Jf. .......... . ........ ..... ,",-';f.('> /' ···a ...................... ::~i;Y-9 ..... ~ r; ~(!)~~ ~.J··"'-'\,l Seconded ................. _ ...... ..19 by ....... . .. ..... That the following accmmts be paid, { tJ{at the Mayor is sue orders on the Treasurer for the same and the Seal of the Corporation be attached here't'o. PARKS ACCOUNT Aurora Hydro Electric B'anner Printing Newmarket Co-Op Slater Lumber Co. St. Andrews Shell Serv. Wilson Hardware Cutting of trees Signs -R~driving golf balls Scyth blades Lumber for bridge decking Moving of seat at pool Scyth stone TOT.Ii.L Carried 12.07- 10.01....._ 18,69- 176.48- 18.00- .!:.1.l! ""'-· 237,04 l '-~ ' Moved by;ff:.,./..L-:,~ / AUG 15 1966 .....:.···=:;?;~ That the following accounts be paid, that the Mayor is sue orders on the Treasurer for the same and the Seal of the Corporation be attached hereto. PROPERTY UPKBEP Aurora Hydro Elec. Aurora Janitor Service Oak-Ridge Refrigeration Wilson Hardware Service Clean-up public washroom 59.21·-... 35.00'- Air Conditioner & wire for conditioner ~ photo copy 574,27- Months supplies 111.31 ~ TOTAL 779.79 ~' ..•... Carried ~·--~--:.,,._,o~''"w"-,_"_;,;.;,(~'-.(,,, ?"'--·--·-.....:........:~-· ·~·-··_, '~'-<-;:~~·-~''-'«"-'='-~""'~;~:.,.~,-,.,;._o""'~"-'\JOUd~'7.t~dQ~izW;=''"'/=,\;J6·-·'''"":':.::_~~,.=...:•;,:,;;.~ ... _:oo: '--'·' ~ ', :._,_ ___ .,·~-'"" __ , "''-'"-"'--='-•"'""~\•'"'-'•~~~'•--y<'----------n' ,L~.~ ._..:_._ AUG 1510S® ~n• 0, ' 1&5~.....:. :: 1f}ifit~U That the following accounts be paid, that the Mayor is sue orders on the Treasurer for the samU the Seal of the Corporation be attached hereto. CENTENNIAL ACC~ Banner Printing Cousins Fiesta Wilson Hardware Letterhead Luncheons Line level & mason line Carried 23. 71'-- 55. 6li, !..&!:!- 81.04 \-,,) ................................ 3~tUG ... ,.~:l .. fJ ... t9.:Ei5 ..................... t9 Moved by ... ~4£~ ....... . Seconded by That the following accounts be paid, that the Mayor is sue orders on the Treasurer for the same and the Seal of the Corporation be attached hereto. FIRE ACCOUNTS Attridge LUmber Co, Aurora Hydro Electrci Bell Telephone Co, Canadian Dust Control Central Office Supply Davis Garage Provincial Fire Prevention Ray's Cafe Southwoodls B, A. Service Wilson Har.dware TOTAL Door Birch Slab Service Repairs to 16,28, Fire Alarm 125,49, 15.4k 141.77 Service Cleaning Supplies Filing Cabinets Repairs to Twp Tanker, and Ford Trucks 49.12 ....__ 3,20_ 94.41_ International Recharge of extinguisher Re 1 Slater Fire 375.08- 17 .33,_ 6.25- 68,38~ 2.89~ Gasoline Florenamel $773.87 ~.:h ... .. .. \ ...... ..-.... Carried f tJ :wbJ-0~~ ~··~~'--•-•-·-----~~-·---~--~-=<.-=·~·~=-~===~=•o==•=-=~··=.o·=""''-~~=~=~~"-"~~....C.'-----'--'-••-•C'---'--·-----.-~~••••.--•~?oo">">"=<~A~=-•--'""•~-·•--.....,_..., .. ,_ ~ tD. ·d:~·-.0.?. ............. 19 Moved That the following accounts be paid, that the Mayor is sue orders on the Treasurer for the same and the Seal of the Corporation be attached hereto. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE ACCOUNTS Casey Construction Co. Schneider & Stevens TOTAL ' Value of Work completed to July 30, 1966 on Complex with 15 % holdback deducted 39 ,64?2. 75 Architectural Service for Designing .. portion \ ~.' Carried 23,299.20 $62,921.95 " l' ~M _,., .._:: ~ u That the following accounts be paid, that the Mayor is sue orders on the Treasurer for the same and the Seal of the Corporation be attached hereto. WELFARE ACCOUNTS * JULY 1966 .. 00% Recoverable from Insurance 100% Recoverable from the Province 80% Recoverable fro~ the Province 2.09(f Recoverable from other Municip. 2.0% Payable by Town of Aurora 2.0% Charges back by other Municip. TOTAL WELFARE PAID COST TO THE TO\\'N OF AURORA $143.00 -19.:2S 1,572.48 105.97 328.24 179~35 2,348.2.9 ... ~J.~ Carried 328..24 179.35 507.59 '''""'"'""''-'J·-·~-0"',...-.. -.• ~~ .--·. ----~•-''-'·'o:.>;;.~O<.IJ..'..'.:,, '--~• _. .,,_..;,,.·-~--'-~~ • ...:C:..'-'-;_:,:,...._,_'":'U.;._.<~~·•~·~>·~""';i•'l>C'>'"·Y.<<•(<,:~"-'<AiC.<=~Z.W."iJ.".'==TO.V..,'.'R'.'.!:5-'0=."'>'=''~"'""'<C'.'"''"' ·-·'·"'· .~["·'-'~~,_;_;_._:;, -•·' ' '' -.--"'· ·'·~~~ -·~;., ... ,:«~! ~-··-' "--"" -·----·~-..-.::... , ·-- • H • AUG 1 OOHOOOOOOOOOO 000 ') ~(j Seconded by ~ -..... ··!;"'O{j--················19 ····· .... ... I That the following accounts be paid, that the Mayor is sue orders on the Treasurer for the same and the Seal of the ·Corporation be attached hereto. WAGE ACCOUNTS W/EJULY 22/66 Bltl!h'tADELL BURLING QUANTZ ATKINSON DRAPER EGAN (H) EGP,N (R) ENGSIG FOSTER GODSCHAK GRIFFIN HIGGINS HISCOCK HOLMAN PAS2TEI~KO ROLLING S AN!lJ ll':'< S STEADMAN TAYLOR - 1 - 78.75 8.50 273.10 17.40 17.63 101.74 90,90 98.17 118,17 94,58 36.90 104.17 50.00 100.58 104.11 107,13 100.20 108.00 81.40 :n.,691.43 W/E JULY 29/66 BAIL'1Jl.JJELL BURLING \!!ELLER EGAN (H) EGAN (R) ENGSIG FOSTER GODSCHAK HIGGINS HOLMAN P.ASZTERKO ROLLING SANDERS STEJlJ)i';JAN TAYLOR ~HO Carried 92.75 81.90 96.54 84~83 82 .• 01 91.35 94.50 84.83 128.10 91.35 84.83 88.20 106.25 98.00 81,40 1,386.84 ~ _, ,..-'-»-'•--' _____:, ____ N,.,.,;,~~·~:.,;,_,,•~· ,, •. --~· .~~· ·~· ~·-·-~~'""=--~,-·-•·.-'~"'-c~~.,~:1!'21fcl\"'YY-"'i<TI:Y"''i'"''Ol'.:ii:.\•,~'tirn+: ~"'-"""'"'-"~ ~~~~·"'·>· L_; ___ ,,_,_,~~~.;,_._,_.;_,,-~_,;~\;_ • ..;.,.-, .. --·---·---''·--··------"·~ /J ,!fuc ·1 ,, <l'"''" / .. . ....... . .... :.'.~\:1 .::!·~~!!!.. . .. 19 ~~./ ~~ ..... //!-. . . ........ ~... . Seconded by ················· .... : ...... ········ ········· ························ ···· .. Moved by .. That the· following accounts be paid, that the Mayor issue orders on the Treasurer for the same and the Seal of the Corporation be attached hereto. V!AGE ACCOUNTS W/E AUGUST 5/66 . 'i:'ELLER BARR ADELL BURLING ATJUNSON DRAJ'PEJ.~ EGAN (H) EGAN {R) ENGSJ:G FOSTER GOUSCHAK HAiiHLTON HIGGINS PASZTERKO HOLMAN ROLLING SANDEH.S STEADMAN ROLLING 86,54 152,25 81,90 88,20 88.20 84.83 81,90 114,23 123,90 84.83 31.45 73.50 84,83 111.08 88,20 88,20 98,00 176,40 1 '738.44 - 2 - W/E AUGUST 12/66 ~i'ELLER BURLING QUANTZ ATE IN SON DRfWER EGA.N (H) EGAN (R) ENGSIG FOSTER GODSCHJ'JK HAMILTON HIGGINS Pf,SZTERXO SANDERS STE!<Dl!.IAN HOLMAN TOTAL VJi',GES $6 , 246 , 54 86.54 81.90 88.20 88.20 101.85 82.88 81.90 91 • .35 91,35 97,75 80.48 88.20 1'!4, 83 88,20 108.00 88.20 1,429.83 =r;.~~ Carried