AGENDA - General Committee - 20171121
General Committee
Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
7 p.m.
Council Chambers
Aurora Town Hall
Public Release
November 10, 2017
Town of Aurora
General Committee
Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
7 p.m., Council Chambers
Councillor Thompson in the Chair
1.Approval of the Agenda
Recommended:
That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved.
2.Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
3.Presentations
(a)Carmela Bourassa, Special Events Coordinator, and Shelley Ware,
Special Events Supervisor
Re: Town of Aurora Platinum Sponsorship Recognition
(b)Julie Stephenson, Youth Programmer, and Shelley Ware, Special Events
Supervisor
Re: Winners of Aurora’s Youth Innovation Fair
4.Delegations
(a)Anita Moore, Chair, Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee
Re: Item R1 – GRAHC17-002 – Council Compensation Review – Final
Report
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Page 2 of 6
5.Consent Agenda
Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine or no longer require
further discussion, and are enacted in one motion. The exception to this rule is that
a Member may request for one or more items to be removed from the Consent
Agenda for separate discussion and action.
Recommended:
That Consent Agenda Item C1 be approved:
C1. Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes of October 31,
2017
Recommended:
1.That the Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee meeting minutes of
October 31, 2017, be received for information.
6.Consideration of Items Requiring Discussion (Regular Agenda)
R1. GRAHC17-002 – Council Compensation Review – Final Report
Recommended:
1.That Report No. GRAHC17-002 be received; and
2.That no change in compensation for the Mayor be made at this time; and
3.That the compensation of Councillors be increased to $36,000 per year,
fully taxable, commencing with the 2018-2022 term of office; and
4.That Council endorse, in principle, commercially available Long-Term
Disability and Accidental Death and Dismemberment protection plans for
the role of the Mayor only, commencing with the next term of office, and
that staff report back with respect to details for Council’s final
consideration and approval; and
5.That an end of service transition payment program be implemented for
the Mayor only, commencing with the 2018-2022 term of office, as
follows:
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Page 3 of 6
(a) Eligible at the completion of one full term, one month of pay for each
completed year of continual service as Mayor to a maximum of six
months’ pay (may be prorated for partial years);
(b) The amount is paid automatically, and paid if the Mayor resigns or
does not return to office for any reason other than as outlined in (c)
below. In the event of the Mayor’s death while in office, the payment
is made to the estate;
(c) No transition payment is paid if the Mayor is removed from office due
to a judicial process and conviction under the Criminal Code, even if
having resigned first; and
6. That no changes be made to transportation allowances, pension, or
health and dental benefit programs currently in place; and
7. That staff bring forward the necessary by-law at a future Council meeting.
R2. PRCS17-040 – Highland Gate Parkland Design
Presentation to be provided by Sara Tienkamp, Acting Manager of Parks
Recommended:
1. That Report No. PRCS17-040 be received; and
2. That the Final Parkland Design for the Highland Gate Development
Lands be approved.
R3. CS17-037 – 2018 Procedure By-law Review and Proposed Meeting
Schedule
Recommended:
1. That Report No. CS17-037 be received; and
2. That the final draft Procedure By-law, incorporating Council feedback, be
presented at a future Council meeting for enactment effective as of
January 1, 2018; and
3. That the 2018 Meeting Schedule (Attachment No. 3) be approved.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Page 4 of 6
R4. PBS17-084 – 2018 Planning Applications Fees
Recommended:
1.That Report No. PBS17-084 be received; and
2.That, in accordance with Section 69 of the Planning Act, Council update
the Planning Applications Fees By-law as shown on attached Schedule
A, which increases the 2018 fees for processing of Planning Applications
by 2.1% (generally) to reflect the Consumer Price Index, and modest
verifiable increases to the Official Plan, Zoning By-law, and Subdivision
and Condominium base fees; and
3.That the amending Planning Applications Fees By-law be brought
forward to a future Council meeting for enactment; and
4.That staff be directed to review and amend the Planning Fee schedule on
an annual basis.
R5. IES17-036 – Metrolinx Railway Overpass Multipurpose Tunnel
Recommended:
1.That Report No. IES17-036 be received; and
2.That Council request The Regional Municipality of York and Metrolinx to
maintain the existing 1.5 meter sidewalk in all future design plans
associated with the BRCE and the future Rapid Transit/Viva Regional
Road Expansion projects; and
3.That any future relocation of the existing pedestrian walkway be
designed to Town of Aurora standards and funded entirely by York
Region.
R6. IES17-039 – Request for Approval of Capital Project No. 72272 –
Stronach Aurora Recreation Complex (SARC) Program
Room Refresh
Recommended:
1.That Report No. IES17-039 be received; and
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Page 5 of 6
2. That Report No. IES17-039 satisfy Council’s conditional budget approval
for Capital Project No. 72272 – SARC Program Room Refresh in the
amount of $20,000, excluding taxes; and
3. That staff be authorized to proceed with Capital Project No. 72272 –
SARC Program Room Refresh.
R7. IES17-040 – Purchase Order Increase for Pool Liner Repairs for the
Stronach Aurora Recreation Complex (SARC) Facility
Recommended:
1. That Report No. IES17-040 be received; and
2. That, in accordance with the Procurement By-law, Purchase Order No.
1149 be increased by $21,480, excluding taxes, to a total of $113,672,
excluding taxes, for pool repairs at the Stronach Aurora Recreation
Complex (SARC) in favour of Nationwide Commercial Aquatics Inc.
R8. PBS17-043 – Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Project
Recommended:
1. That Report No. PBS17-043 be received; and
2. That the Mayor and Town Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement
with a new landowners group and The Regional Municipality of York, for
an Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Project based on the principles
outlined in this report, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and
Building Services and the Town Solicitor.
R9. PBS17-085 – Proposal for Zoning By-law Amendment Application
Recommended:
1. That Report No. PBS17-085 be received; and
2. That the Zoning By-law Proposals from the following applicants be
accepted as Zoning By-law Amendment Applications:
(a) 2501500 Ontario Inc. (16003 Yonge Street), File No. ZP-2017-09
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Page 6 of 6
(b) 2540280 Ontario Inc. (255 Old Yonge Street), File No. ZP-2017-10
(c) Shen & He (15385-15395 Bayview Avenue), File No. ZP-2017-11
7. Notices of Motion
(a) Councillor Mrakas
Re: Interim Control By-law – Stable Neighbourhoods
8. New Business
9. Closed Session
10. Adjournment
Delegation Request
7KLV'HOHJDWLRQ5HTXHVWIRUPDQGDQ\ZULWWHQVXEPLVVLRQVRUEDFNJURXQGLQIRUPDWLRQ
IRUFRQVLGHUDWLRQE\HLWKHU&RXQFLORU&RPPLWWHHVRI&RXQFLOPXVWEHVXEPLWWHGWRWKH
&OHUN¶VRIILFHE\WKHIROORZLQJGHDGOLQH
+DYH\RXEHHQLQFRQWDFWZLWKD7RZQVWDIIRU
&RXQFLOPHPEHUUHJDUGLQJ\RXUPDWWHURILQWHUHVW"<HV ܆1R ܆
,I\HVZLWKZKRP"
'DWH
܆,DFNQRZOHGJHWKDWWKH3URFHGXUH%\ODZSHUPLWVILYHPLQXWHVIRU'HOHJDWLRQV
/HJLVODWLYH6HUYLFHV
&OHUNV#DXURUDFD
7RZQRI$XURUD
-RKQ:HVW:D\%R[
$XURUD21/*-
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Delegation (a)
Page 1 of 1
Town of Aurora
Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee
Meeting Minutes
Date: Tuesday, October 31, 2017
Time and Location: 11 a.m., Holland Room, Aurora Town Hall
Committee Members: Anita Moore (Chair), Anna Lozyk Romeo (Vice-Chair), Steve
Hinder, Bill Hogg, and Terry Jones
Member(s) Absent: None
Other Attendees: Dan Elliott, Director of Financial Services, and Michael de
Rond, Town Clerk
The Chair called the meeting to order at 11 a.m.
1. Approval of the Agenda
Moved by Terry Jones
Seconded by Steve Hinder
That the agenda, as circulated by Legislative Services, be approved.
Carried
2. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
There were no declarations of pecuniary interest under the Municipal Conflict of
Interest Act.
3. Receipt of the Minutes
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item C1
Page 1 of 3
Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, October 31, 2017 Page 2 of 3
Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes of October 10, 2017
Moved by Steve Hinder
Seconded by Bill Hogg
That the Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee meeting minutes of October 10,
2017, be received for information.
Carried
4. Delegations
None
5. Matters for Consideration
1. Extract from Council Meeting of October 24, 2017
Re: Motion (c) Councillor Humfryes, Re: Reduction of Council Size
The Committee discussed Council’s approval of a motion to decrease
Council’s size from nine to seven Members. The Committee decided that the
reduction in Council size had no impact on its original recommendations
regarding Council compensation. The Committee agreed that an additional
paragraph be added to the report acknowledging the reduction in Council
size and confirming that it did not influence the Committee’s
recommendations.
Moved by Bill Hogg
Seconded by Anna Lozyk Romeo
1. That the Extract from Council Meeting of October 24, 2017, regarding
Motion (c) Councillor Humfryes, Re: Reduction of Council Size, be
received; and
2. That the comments of the Committee be referred to staff for
consideration and action as appropriate.
Carried
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item C1
Page 2 of 3
Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, October 31, 2017 Page 3 of 3
6. Informational Items
2. Extract from Council Meeting of October 24, 2017
Re: Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee Minutes of September 12,
2017, and September 26, 2017
Moved by Bill Hogg
Seconded by Anna Lozyk Romeo
1. That the Extract from Council Meeting of October 24, 2017, regarding
Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes of September
12, 2017, and September 26, 2017, be received for information.
Carried
7. New Business
None
8. Adjournment
Moved by Terry Jones
Seconded by Steve Hinder
That the meeting be adjourned at 12 p.m.
Carried
Committee recommendations are not binding on the Town unless adopted by Council.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item C1
Page 3 of 3
Town of Aurora
General Committee Report No. GRAHC17-002
Subject: Council Compensation Review – Final Report
Prepared by: Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee
Date: November 21, 2017
Recommendation
1. That Report No. GRAHC17-002 be received; and
2. That no change in compensation for the Mayor be made at this time; and
3. That the compensation of Councillors be increased to $36,000 per year, fully
taxable, commencing with the 2018-2022 term of office; and
4. That Council endorse, in principle, commercially available Long-Term
Disability and Accidental Death and Dismemberment protection plans for the
role of the Mayor only, commencing with the next term of office, and that staff
report back with respect to details for Council’s final consideration and
approval; and
5. That an end of service transition payment program be implemented for the
Mayor only, commencing with the 2018-2022 term of office, as follows:
(a) Eligible at the completion of one full term, one month of pay for each
completed year of continual service as Mayor to a maximum of six
months’ pay (may be prorated for partial years);
(b) The amount is paid automatically, and paid if the Mayor resigns or does
not return to office for any reason other than as outlined in (c) below. In
the event of the Mayor’s death while in office, the payment is made to the
estate;
(c) No transition payment is paid if the Mayor is removed from office due to a
judicial process and conviction under the Criminal Code, even if having
resigned first; and
6. That no changes be made to transportation allowances, pension, or health
and dental benefit programs currently in place; and
7. That staff bring forward the necessary by-law at a future Council meeting.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R1
Page 1 of 11
November 21, 2017 Page 2 of 11 Report No. GRAHC17-002
Executive Summary
This is the final report of the Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee (GRAHC), and it
recommends some changes to the structure of Council compensation that is currently in
place. Council has previously adopted recommendations from GRAHC to have the
Councillor role remain part-time and for the one-third tax exempt status to be removed
for all of Council with the salaries grossed up to meet the previous total amount, with
this change to be implemented January 1, 2018.
Key observations of Committee:
• An individual who stands for public office is providing a public service for which
they should be fairly compensated.
• That any increase in compensation considered be justifiable to this Committee
and seen as fair by residents.
• An individual who stands for public office does not require any specific skills,
experience or background education with the exception that they must be a
qualified elector. The roles and responsibilities of being a Member of Council,
particularly its policy setting role, benefit from skills such as critical thinking,
community engagement and ability to understand research information and
material.
• Review of The Municipal Act, 2001 and the Provincial guide was necessary to
assist in defining the role of a Councillor.
• The Committee observed that many Councillors, past and present, have by
personal choice and circumstance extended their work beyond the governance
role.
• The Mayor is a full-time senior executive position of the organization.
The following are the key points and recommendations in the Committee’s final report
on Council compensation:
• The core tasks involved with being a Member of Council played an important role
in the Committee’s final recommendation.
• In addition to the general tasks associated with being a Member of Council, the
Committee considered a broad range of other factors that affect compensation.
• The Mayor’s current compensation is appropriate, while Councillors were
generally on the low end relative to the comparators used.
• The Committee recommends a 7.5% increase in Councillors salaries, effective
for the 2018-2022 term.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R1
Page 2 of 11
November 21, 2017 Page 3 of 11 Report No. GRAHC17-002
• The Committee recommends that health and dental benefits as well as the
current pension plan structure remain the same.
• Accidental Death and Dismemberment insurance, as well as Long-Term
Disability Protection Plans are becoming the norm for full-time elected officials in
Ontario.
• The Committee recommends that an end of service transition payment program
be implemented for the Mayor only commencing with the 2018-2022 term of
office.
Background
As a reminder, the Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee was established early in
2017 for the purpose of reviewing and providing advice on governance issues related to
the Town, including Council composition, structure and compensation, and election
provisions.
Since the Committee’s first meeting in February 2017, it has made recommendations to
Council regarding: internet voting; Council’s tax-free compensation component; part-
time designation for the Councillor role; a ward system review that should take place
early in the 2018-2022 term of office; and striking the next governance review
committee within the first 12 months of that term.
This is the final report of this Committee to Council and it will deal with remuneration for
Members of Council.
The Committee felt that it was important to set out the background and rationale for the
remuneration recommendations being presented. The focus of this report will primarily
be on the Councillor position as the Committee felt that the Mayor’s position was
adequately remunerated.
From the outset of this review, the Committee proceeded on the fundamental premise
that an individual who stands for public office is providing a public service and as such
positions on Council couldn’t be viewed in the same light as a career or “job” (and not
comparable to staff positions) given that individuals are elected to the positions every
four years.
The Committee recognized, however, that attaining public office is providing an
incredibly vital service to the community and a person seeking public office should
expect fair compensation for the service provided. This was the starting point for the
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R1
Page 3 of 11
November 21, 2017 Page 4 of 11 Report No. GRAHC17-002
Committee as was the earlier confirmation by this Council that a Councillor position
should remain designated as part-time.
To assist with understanding the role of a Councillor, the Committee referred to The
Municipal Act, 2001 as amended, the legislated framework under which municipalities
operate. It contains sections on the Role of Council and the Role of Head of Council
(Mayor). The applicable sections are as follows:
S. 224 It is the role of council,
(a) to represent the public and to consider the well-being and interests of the
municipality;
(b) to develop and evaluate the policies and programs of the municipality;
(c) to determine which services the municipality provides;
(d) to ensure that administrative policies, practices and procedures and
controllership policies, practices and procedures are in place to implement the
decisions of council;
(d.1) to ensure the accountability and transparency of the operations of the
municipality, including the activities of the senior management of the municipality;
(e) to maintain the financial integrity of the municipality; and
(f) to carry out the duties of council under this or any other Act.
S. 225 It is the role of the head of council,
(a) to act as chief executive officer of the municipality;
(b) to preside over council meetings so that its business can be carried out efficiently
and effectively;
(c) to provide leadership to the council;
(c.1) without limiting clause (c), to provide information and recommendations to the
council with respect to the role of council described in clauses 224 (d) and (d.1);
(d) to represent the municipality at official functions; and
(e) to carry out the duties of the head of council under this or any other Act.
S. 226.1 As chief executive officer of a municipality, the head of council shall,
(a) uphold and promote the purposes of the municipality;
(b) promote public involvement in the municipality’s activities;
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R1
Page 4 of 11
November 21, 2017 Page 5 of 11 Report No. GRAHC17-002
(c) act as the representative of the municipality both within and outside the
municipality, and promote the municipality locally, nationally and internationally;
and
(d) participate in and foster activities that enhance the economic, social and
environmental well-being of the municipality and its residents.
The Municipal Act does not specifically set out the role of a Councillor and a job
description is not readily found so the Committee also reviewed the 2014 Municipal
Councillor’s Guide (produced by the Province of Ontario). The Role of the Councillor in
that guide is as follows:
“As a councillor, you have three main roles to play in your municipality: a
representative, a policy-making and a stewardship role. These roles may often
overlap. You will be called on to consider and make decisions on issues that will
sometimes be complex and controversial. Many of those decisions will have long-term
consequences for your municipality that extend beyond your four-year term of office,
and should be made in the context of your municipality’s directions for the long-term
health and welfare of your community.”
Analysis
The tasks involved with being a Member of Council played an important role in
the Committee’s final recommendation.
There are many factors which need to be considered as influencing the compensation
of elected officials. An individual who stands for public office does not require any
specific skills, experience or background education with the exception that they must be
a qualified elector. The roles and responsibilities of being a member of Council,
particularly its policy setting role, benefit from skills such as critical thinking, community
engagement and ability to understand research information and material.
The tasks are primarily attending meetings, and necessary but reasonable meeting
preparation as well as representing the interest of the community as a whole. There is
clearly a time commitment required to fulfil the office, meaning time lost to family and
employer for those who have employment elsewhere. In addition, the Committee
recognized that elected officials place themselves into the public eye, receiving public
scrutiny, both positive and negative. While the positions of Mayor and Councillor can
have great personal rewards more often than not, the scrutiny in the public domain can
be critically negative.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R1
Page 5 of 11
November 21, 2017 Page 6 of 11 Report No. GRAHC17-002
The Committee determined that the workload of a Councillor can vary greatly amongst
members depending upon the time that he or she has available. Some members of
Council may choose to make their role a much larger commitment of time than others
by participating in community events, on boards, committees, associations, attending
committee meetings to which they are not appointed, attending luncheons, etc. These
additional activities may not be within any specific scope of the role of Councillor, and
may in some situations actually fall within the role of the Head of Council as set out in
The Municipal Act. The Committee’s intent is not to be critical of members who have
chosen to commit more time but to identify that the issue of varied time commitments
did form a large part of the discussion as we reviewed Council remuneration.
The Committee did focus on the governance role of a Councillor which includes
attending Council and General Committee meetings, reviewing agendas, seeking
clarification, taking the time to ask questions of staff beforehand and to meet with
residents to understand issues as needed.
In addition to the general tasks associated with being a Member of Council, the
Committee considered a broad range of other factors and information in
evaluating compensation.
Annual compensation of the Mayor and Councillors was viewed by the Committee
through a number of different lenses. These included:
• Any increase considered must be justifiable to this Committee and seen as fair
by residents;
• Direct comparisons of 2017 compensation rates to those of a number of
comparator municipalities, recognizing the impacts that wards vs. at-large
councillors and full-time vs. part-time may have on the comparisons;
• Comparison to the 50th percentile of the comparative group;
• Compensation of Mayor and Councillor and as a group as a percent of tax levy of
the municipality, and how that compared to other municipalities;
• The relationship of Councillor compensation as a percent of the Mayor’s
compensation, and the comparators;
• A review of the history of annual cost of living adjustments granted to elected
officials at Aurora;
• Estimated hours of work required for part-time councillors based on the
governance role, and the resultant range of hourly rates and based on various
proposed annual compensation; and
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R1
Page 6 of 11
November 21, 2017 Page 7 of 11 Report No. GRAHC17-002
• Recognition that the Committee had recommended, and Council approved, the
elimination of the one-third tax free status of elected official compensation
effective January 1, 2018.
In addition, the Committee reviewed the previous council compensation committee’s
report (CCAC12-001) as well as a 2014 CAO report (CAO14-014) on the same subject.
The Committee did consider Members of Council as part of the overall corporate culture
and had discussion at length on these recommendations and their effect in an
environment where financial restraint may be evident.
The Mayor’s current compensation is appropriate, while Councillors were
generally on the low end relative to the comparators used.
It was generally agreed by the Committee that the Mayor is appropriately compensated,
particularly following the last compensation review (2012) which increased the Mayor’s
salary by $9,000 per year. The Committee is satisfied that no further adjustment to the
Mayor’s salary is necessary or justifiable at this time.
As to Councillor compensation, the Committee and Council agreed that these positions
continue to be considered part-time. It was recognized that with the growth of the
community, some increase in hours required may have occurred over the years,
however, not sufficient to warrant these roles to be full-time in nature. The Committee
observed that many members, past and present, have by personal choice and
circumstance extended their work beyond the governance role of the Councillor as
broadly set out in The Municipal Act, and the applicable handbook of the Province of
Ontario.
When viewing Councillor compensation through the various lenses listed earlier in this
report, the Committee recognized that the compensation of Aurora’s Councillors
appeared to be low relative to the comparators in most of the perspectives reviewed.
Some adjustment was likely appropriate.
The current compensation of a councillor is $29,488, and one-third of that is tax free. In
January, 2018, the one-third tax free portion is being discontinued, and the
compensation will be grossed up to $32,890. On April 1, 2018, it is anticipated that a
Cost of Living Adjustment of 1.75% will be approved with the budget, bringing
compensation for the councillor role up to $33,466.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R1
Page 7 of 11
November 21, 2017 Page 8 of 11 Report No. GRAHC17-002
Councillor compensation should be reviewed if further changes are made to
Council structure (ward system) in the future.
The work of at-large elected councillors may be different than ward system councillors,
depending on ward numbers and how Council may be subsequently structured. It
would be appropriate to review councillor compensation in this light if further changes
are made to the structure of Council in the future. In addition, this would also provide
an opportunity for Council to explore and discuss the merits and need of an elected full-
time Deputy Mayor position. In principle, and given research material, the Committee
believes it may be appropriate and suggests that both these matters be reviewed in the
context of the ward system review which is to take place early next term.
Council decision of October 24, 2017, to reduce the number of Councillors for the
next term.
As the work of the Committee was concluding and this report was in its final stages of
preparation, Council approved a motion to reduce the number of Councillors beginning
with the next term. The GRAHC quickly reconvened to consider whether this decision
would have any effect on this report’s recommendations. The Committee considered
the impact of the possible increase in constituent contacts, the number of committees
members could be expected to sit on and other possible influencing factors. Committee
agreed that the analysis, recommendations and report content did not require
amendment, other than the addition of this section and a corresponding revision to a
budget impact statement.
The GRAHC does see the reduction of councillors as an opportune time for Council to
review how its operations could become even more efficient and effective. This could
include a review of the number, composition and mandates of committees established
by Council, as well as an in-depth review of the Procedure By-law.
The Committee recommends a 7.5% increase in Councillors salaries, effective for
the 2018-2022 term.
Based on the factors noted above, the Committee recommends to Council that the
annual compensation of elected Councillors be adjusted to $36,000 effective the next
term of Council, representing an adjustment of approximately 7.5%. This recognizes
that while the community has continued to grow, Councillor compensation has remained
status quo (with the exception of cost of living/consumer price index adjustments) since
prior to the 2010-2014 term. It is noted though that the Council of last term, chose not
to make any amendment to compensation for councillors.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R1
Page 8 of 11
November 21, 2017 Page 9 of 11 Report No. GRAHC17-002
The Committee also recommends that no adjustment to the Mayor’s compensation be
made at this time. The estimated budget impact to the Town for 2019 is $18,000
(based on six councillors).
The Committee recommends that health and dental benefits as well as the current
pension plan structure remain the same.
The Committee reviewed the current structure of health and dental benefits and pension
plan and agreed that these are all realistic and reasonable in the circumstances for both
part-time and full-time roles of Council, and that no changes are recommended at this
time.
Accidental Death and Dismemberment insurance, as well as Long-Term Disability
Protection Plans are becoming the norm for full-time elected officials in Ontario.
The Mayor is a full-time senior executive position of the organization and it is not
currently provided with Accidental Death & Dismemberment insurance (AD&D) or with a
Long-Term Disability protection plan (LTD). The Committee believes it appropriate that
this position be provided with the added income protection of commercially available
AD&D and LTD policy plans, which would provide income protection in the event of an
accident or medical circumstance that prevents them from returning to the role for an
extended period of time. Committee recommends that this change, commencing with
the new term of office, be endorsed in principle, with staff preparing a separate report
on costs and implications of commercially available policies of this nature.
While it is beyond the scope of this Committee, in the event of an extended AD&D or
LTD claim, Council would need to consider how it would select a replacement Mayor to
act in the interim period. Under the current structure, the Deputy Mayor, a part-time
Councillor, may be unable to fulfil the full-time requirements of the role of Mayor for an
extended period of time. Consideration should be given to making provisions for such a
scenario.
The Committee recommends that an end of service transition payment program
be implemented for the Mayor position only commencing with the 2018-2022 term
of office.
The Committee considered the end of service transition payment plans of surrounding
municipalities. Recognizing that the role of Mayor requires a full-time commitment,
implying the giving up of a previous career, employment or business, the Committee
believes it appropriate to offer a transition payment program similar to other
municipalities, providing a financial bridge at the end of public service to allow a
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R1
Page 9 of 11
November 21, 2017 Page 10 of 11 Report No. GRAHC17-002
transition period back into private life, restarting a career, employment or resurgence of
a business.
The Committee recommends that the transition plan be as follows:
• Eligible at the completion of one full term, one month of pay for each completed
year of continual service as Mayor commencing with the 2018 election term,
maximum six months’ pay (may be prorated for partial years).
• Amount is paid automatically, and paid if for any reason other than as outlined
below, the Mayor resigns or does not return to office. In the event of a Mayor’s
death while in office, payment is made to the estate.
• No severance is paid if the Mayor is removed from office due to a judicial process
and conviction under the Criminal Code, even if resigned first.
The estimated budget impact to the Town for 2019 for the End of Service Transition
Payment is $10,000.
Conclusions
It is imperative that individuals with a diverse range of skills and experiences be
encouraged to stand for public office. Those that become a Member of Council will
play an integral role in affecting public policy putting those skills into service for their
community as a whole.
The Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee (GRAHC) spent considerable time and
deliberation on many factors in the process of reaching the final recommendations
contained in this report. The Committee believes the recommendations represent fair
value for the work being done by elected officials on behalf of the residents of the Town
of Aurora.
The most noteworthy conclusion of this report, and of the Council Compensation review
process as a whole, is that Town of Aurora Councillors are deserving of an increase in
their yearly salary. The Committee is recommending this increase, effective with the
2018-2022 term of office, be approximately 7.5% of their anticipated salary, or a yearly
total of $36,000.00. The Committee further recommends that the Mayor’s
compensation remain status quo.
Previous Reports
GRAHC17-001 - Interim Report #1 of the Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee Re:
Council Compensation Review
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R1
Page 10 of 11
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R1 Page 11 of 11
Town of Aurora
General Committee Report No. PRCS17-040
Subject: Highland Gate Parkland Design
Prepared by: Sara Tienkamp, Acting Manager of Parks
Department: Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
Date: November 21, 2017
Recommendations
1. That Report No. PRCS17-040 be received; and
2. That the Final Parkland Design for the Highland Gate Development Lands be
approved.
Executive Summary
This report is to provide Council information and recommendations associated with the
final design for parkland and open space corridors within the Highland Gate
Development:
• Direction of Council is required to finalize the parkland design for Highland Gate
Developments Inc.
• Implementation of Working Group ideas addressed in final park and open spaces
design for Highland Gate
• Agreement has been achieved
Background
On June 27, 2017, Council received PRCS17-026 Highland Gate Conceptual Parkland
Design with recommendations that the Conceptual Parkland Design for the Highland
Gate Development Lands be approved as presented at the Public Open House, April 5,
2017.
The report contained resident comments from the public open house, including staff and
the landscape consultant’s comments on the conceptual design. As well, it considered
the requirements agreed upon within the signed Minutes of Settlement and a notation
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R2
Page 1 of 15
November 21, 2017 Page 2 of 5 Report No. PRCS17-040
that changes not in direct conflict with the Minutes of Settlement could be made without
making any amendments to the executed document.
Both the HGRPA and AHPC delegated to Council during this meeting indicating, that
they were willing to come together to address outstanding issues both groups had with
regards to the design. Staff was directed by Council to form a working group with
Highland Gate Development Inc. HGDI, the landscape consultant, HGRPA and AHPC
to give all parties an opportunity to provide comment, share ideas, relay concerns in
finalizing the details of the parkland design.
Analysis
Direction of Council is required to finalize parkland design for Highland Gate
Developments Inc.
Following the June 27, 2017 Council meeting, the W orking Group consisting of Highland
Gate Developments Inc. (HGDI), Highland Gate Ratepayers Group (HGRPG), Ad-Hoc
Park Committee (AHPC) and staff met on July 24, 2017. At this initial meeting, HGRPG
and AHPC had an opportunity look at the initial set of draft plans with the guidance of
the landscape consultant who helped answer questions and concerns. All parties had a
chance to speak to their concerns, share ideas and come to a better understanding of
the project. The meeting was highly productive and it was agreed that HGDI direct the
landscape consultant to start the detailed design stage of the project.
On September 21, 2017 the landscape consultant presented preliminary detailed design
drawings incorporating items discussed from the previous working group meeting. Both
HGRPG and AHPC were pleased with the progress and inclusion of ideas and
considerations presented by both parties.
The final detailed drawings were reviewed on November 3, 2017, where the outstanding
actions requiring further information were addressed.
HGDI is set to commence construction in spring 2018 contingent on final parkland
design approval, authorization of permits for the naturalization of the ponds and
rehabilitation of the stream.
Implementation of Working Group ideas addressed in final park and open space
design for Highland Gate
The Working Group review process was a very effective means in communicating,
wherein staff obtained suggestions and input on the final detailed park design.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R2
Page 2 of 15
November 21, 2017 Page 3 of 5 Report No. PRCS17-040
Staff consolidated input received during these meetings. The following chart
summarizes each of the suggested concepts or concerns of the park amenities, along
with comments on how they were incorporated or dealt with in the final parkland design:
Park Amenity Comments/Ideas Incorporated into Parkland Design
Spine Trail Lighting Photometric study completed, no impact on adjacent properties
Trail realigned away from adjacent properties to minimize light impact,
where possible
Specific LED bulbs selected as they cast a soft white glow
Light shields to be placed on poles immediately adjacent to trail
Boardwalk lighting incorporated in railing to be less intrusive
Planting design to be utilized to screen light poles
Town standard light fixtures
Pathway lights to function on a timer, coming on at dusk and turning off at
11pm, year round.
Vegetation
Parkland to be naturalized and generally passive
70mm caliper trees to be planted
Minimal tree removal exception hazard trees and trees in conflict with creek
realignment and retaining walls
Carolinian tree species
Native seed mix to promote birds/butterflies and bee habitat
Plant design screens active park areas and light fixtures
Shade Structures
Original mid-point structure removed from plans
Playground shade structure relocated away from homes and designed to
allow privacy to residents homes
On Line Ponds LSRCA requirement, ponds taken off line
“Riffle Pool” sequence design to naturalize the water system by allowing
water to flow freely
Playground Playground relocated to be centered on Cranberry entrance between
adjacent residents properties
Natural colour palette for structure to blend in with natural environment
Minimal lighting, utilizing solar energy
Accessible features
Wood mulch fall protection safety surface
Solar lights to light immediate area
Exercise Stations Number of stations reduced
“Bench-Fit” equipment to be installed which functions as a bench to sit but
also has instructional signage to allow bench to be utilized for fitness
Meditation Circle Labyrinth design to complement passive park concept
Reflexology features
Signage Historical plaques to recognize history of property in community
Trail head signs, maps and wayfinding signs as per Town signage strategy
Park Maintenance
Service Levels
Maintain to Town standard in accordance with Parks Maintenance Standard
Service Levels
1 m buffer to be maintained along trails, rest of park to be naturalized
Active areas around features to be maintained eg: playground, meditation
circle, exercise benches
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R2
Page 3 of 15
November 21, 2017 Page 4 of 5 Report No. PRCS17-040
Agreement has been achieved
All issues have been resolved or incorporated in the design of the park. There were
significant concerns with regards to the pathway lighting and its impact on surrounding
properties. The committee worked very hard together to incorporate as many features
as possible to mitigate the effect on residents private lands, including placing pathway
lighting on timers to energize at dusk and turn off at 11pm, throughout the year.
Advisory Committee Review
Not applicable.
Financial Implications
All amenities within the parkland and open space blocks of Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the
Highland Gate Development are eligible for development charge credits to HGDI and
total approximately$1,700,000, inclusive of additional contributions from HGDI per unit.
The preliminary cost estimate for the Parkland Block construction in Phase 1 is
$2,213,079. The ineligible costs of $513,079 for Phase 1 would therefore need to be
funded from the Development Charge Reserve account. These financial implications
are based in initial cost estimates
Additional funding will be required to complete Phase 2 open space and parkland blocks
with trails, pathway lighting and bridge crossings.
Following Council approval of the parkland design, staff will complete a more detailed
analysis of the construction costs in preparation for inclusion in the Subdivision
Agreement.
Communications Considerations
Communications staff to update Town of Aurora website with new information as
necessary.
Link to Strategic Plan
The Award of Tender supports the Strategic Plan Goal of Supporting an Exceptional
Quality of Life for All, by encouraging an active and healthy lifestyle.
Develop a long-term needs assessment for recreation programs, services and
operations to match the evolving needs of the growing and changing population.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R2
Page 4 of 15
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R2 Page 5 of 15
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R2 Page 6 of 15
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R2 Page 7 of 15
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R2 Page 8 of 15
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R2 Page 9 of 15
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R2 Page 10 of 15
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R2 Page 11 of 15
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R2 Page 12 of 15
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R2 Page 13 of 15
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R2 Page 14 of 15
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R2 Page 15 of 15
Town of Aurora
General Committee Report No. CS17-037
Subject: 2018 Procedure By-law Review and Proposed Meeting Schedule
Prepared by: Samantha Yew, Deputy Town Clerk
Department: Corporate Services
Date: November 21, 2017
Recommendation
1.That Report No. CS17-037 be received; and
2.That the final draft Procedure By-law, incorporating Council feedback, be
presented at a future Council meeting for enactment effective as of January 1,
2018; and
3.That the 2018 Meeting Schedule (Attachment No. 3) be approved.
Executive Summary
The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of proposed amendments to By-law
No. 5820-16, as amended, (the Procedure By-law) which was passed by Council in
November 2016 and has been in effect as of January 1, 2017. This report is also to
establish a 2018 Meeting Schedule for Council and Committee meetings.
•The proposed amendments to the Procedure By-law focus on enhancing meeting
efficiency, clarity, and capturing current practices.
•Approval of a 2018 Meeting Schedule is required as per the Procedure By-law.
Background
The Municipal Act, 2001 (the “Act”) requires Council to pass a by-law to govern its rules
of procedure for Council and Committee meetings. The previous Procedural By-law, No.
5330-11, as amended, had been in effect since 2011 with minor amendments passed in
2013. Council’s current Procedure By-law was passed in November 2016 and has been
in effect as of January 1, 2017.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R3
Page 1 of 50
November 21, 2017 Page 2 of 6 Report No. CS17-037
Staff committed to providing a review within one year to evaluate the effectiveness of
the current Procedure By-law and propose amendments to further enhance and ensure
it is keeping within the guiding principles of the initial By-law review:
• Aurora Town Council is the decision-making body of the Corporation;
• Council’s Committees make recommendations to Council and are not the final
decision-making bodies unless that authority has been explicitly delegated by
Council as such;
• Public and stakeholder input is a valued part of the decision-making process
• Council’s decision-making process should be:
▪ Open and transparent;
▪ Conducted in an environment which is respectful of all participants;
▪ Balance debate with the need to make recommendations and decisions in a
timely manner;
• Procedural rules should facilitate and not hinder the business of Council; and
• Procedural rules should comply with Robert’s Rules of Order and should be written
in plain language.
The proposed changes to the By-law are based on staff feedback and comments
received from one-on-one consultations between the CAO and Council.
In past years, the Meeting Schedule has been brought forward in a separate report.
However, due to the proposed By-law amendments, consideration of the 2018 Meeting
Schedule at the same time will ensure that changes to the By-law are captured.
Analysis
The proposed amendments to the Procedure By-law focus on enhancing meeting
efficiency, clarity, and capturing current practices
The proposed amendments to the Procedure By-law are detailed in Attachment No. 1.
They include but are not limited to:
• Replacing Presentations with Community Updates. This change will more
accurately reflect the type of information being relayed during this section of the
meeting. To ensure effective meeting scheduling and efficiency, the number of
times a group or individual is permitted to present at Council or General
Committee meetings on an annual basis will be limited. Staff presentations relating
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R3
Page 2 of 50
November 21, 2017 Page 3 of 6 Report No. CS17-037
to items will be included as part of the item, eliminating the time between the
presentation and discussion.
• Addition of further guidelines for Delegations. These additions will include
▪ Limiting delegations to four at General Committee and two at Council;
▪ Grouping of delegations from the same association or body; and
▪ Eliminating active Planning application delegations at Council; and
▪ Eliminating delegations regarding proposals for Zoning By-law Amendment
applications for the remainder of the two-year moratorium as outlined in
Section 34 (10.0.0.1) of the Planning Act.
These measures will allow for more efficient meetings and reduce the amount of
duplicated information being presented to Council. The public will continue to have
the opportunity to submit written correspondence and petitions to General
Committee or Council, which is circulated to Members and can be added to the
agenda as a Consent Item at the request of a Member. Any correspondence or
petitions placed on an agenda will form part of the public record.
• Addition of agenda sections to improve meeting flow and streamline meeting
minutes. Changes include the addition of an Advisory Committee Minutes section
on the General Committee agenda and Standing Committee Reports section on
the Council agenda.
▪ The addition of an Advisory Committee Minutes section will eliminate the
need for a separate Summary of Committee Recommendations report, as the
Committee recommendations will be listed in the agenda index as they were
prior to the 2016 Procedure By-law review. All Advisory Committee minutes
can be approved in one motion if further discussion is not required.
▪ A Standing Committee Reports section on the Council agenda will allow for
the consideration of General Committee items under one agenda section,
eliminating the need to ‘pull’ items that require further discussion to the
Regular Agenda which can cause confusion. As is current practice, all items
not requiring separate discussion can be approved in one motion.
Feedback has indicated that the minutes are difficult to follow, especially with the
‘pulling’ of items from the Consent Agenda to Regular Agenda. These changes will
make the meeting and minutes more clear to the reader.
• Expanding the criteria for Consent Agenda items. Staff have identified item
types that could be added to the Consent Agenda items criteria, based on
discussions from previous meetings.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R3
Page 3 of 50
November 21, 2017 Page 4 of 6 Report No. CS17-037
• Amending agenda distribution dates to allow for more efficient agenda
compilation and distribution. The proposed amendments suggest moving the
General Committee agenda distribution date to the Tuesday prior to a meeting, the
Council Agenda distribution date to the Thursday prior to a meeting, and Additional
Items distribution date to the Monday prior to a meeting. Moving the distribution
dates will allow for more efficient agenda distribution, eliminating the backups
frequently experienced by Legislative Services staff on Friday afternoons.
Draft agenda indices have been included as Attachment No. 2, outlining the proposed
changes.
Approval of a 2018 Meeting Schedule is required as per the Procedure By-law
Section 19 of the Procedure By-law establishes rules for the timing of Standing
Committee and Council meetings. The proposed 2018 Meeting Schedule is provided as
Attachment No. 3. As 2018 is an election year, staff propose a variation of Council’s
past meeting schedules. These variations include:
• A one cycle schedule in March and September to accommodate March Break and
2018 Election preparations;
• As has been past practice in previous election years, the conclusion of all Advisory
and Ad Hoc Committees in or prior to June 2018 with the exception of the Heritage
Advisory Committee, Aurora Public Library Board, Aurora Cultural Centre Board,
Aurora Economic Development Board, and Committee of Adjustment;
• Rescheduling the September Heritage Advisory Committee meeting from Monday,
September 10, to Wednesday, September 5, to allow for meeting minutes to be
brought forward to the Tuesday, September 11 General Committee meeting for
consideration;
• No Standing Committee or Council meetings in October or November, with the
exception of the final meeting of the incumbent Council on Tuesday, November 27;
• Inaugural Council Meeting of 2018-2022 Council on Tuesday, December 4.
The Aurora Cultural Centre Board, Aurora Public Library Board, Aurora Economic
Development Board, Joint Council Committee and Committee of Adjustment will
continue to be scheduled as outlined in their respective Terms of Reference or by-law.
As in past election years, the 2019 Capital and Operating Budgets will be brought
forward in early 2019 for Council consideration.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R3
Page 4 of 50
November 21, 2017 Page 5 of 6 Report No. CS17-037
Advisory Committee Review
None
Financial Implications
None
Communications Considerations
Upon Council approval of the Procedure By-law amendments, staff will communicate
the changes on the Town webpage and to a limited extent the Town’s social media
platforms, and prepare an annotated booklet of the Procedure By-law for Council,
Committee members and the public to assist with process during meetings. The
approved 2018 Meeting Schedule will be posted to the Town website.
Link to Strategic Plan
The proposed Procedure By-law amendments and 2018 Meeting Schedule supports
Strengthening the fabric of our community by identifying new formats, methods and
technologies to effectively and regularly engage the community, and Progressive
corporate excellence and continuous improvement by implementing policy and
processes that reflect sound and accountable governance.
Alternative(s) to the Recommendation
1. Council may choose to not amend the Procedure By-law.
2. Council may choose to approve an alternative Meeting Schedule.
3. Council may choose to provide direction on amendments they deem appropriate.
Conclusions
This report has been prepared to provide Council with a summary of proposed
amendments to Council’s Procedure By-law and staff is seeking direction to complete
the Procedure By-law review and present the Procedure By-law amendments at a future
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R3
Page 5 of 50
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R3 Page 6 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationaleAdd - Definition for "head" in reference to MFIPPAAdd - Other definitions based on potential changes, ex. Emergency weather eventCouncil Meeting agendas are generally available to Members of Council and the public on each Friday preceding a Meeting.Council meeting agendas are to be distributed the Thursday prior to the meeting (from four days to five days prior to a meeting)More efficient agenda distributionMinimize agenda build up on FridayGeneral Committee agendas to be distributed to Members of Council on the Monday the week prior to the meeting (from 12 days to eight days prior to a meeting)More efficient agenda distributionMinimize agenda build up on FridayGeneral Committee agendas are to be available to the public one week prior to the meeting (from 11 days to seven days prior to a meeting)More efficient agenda distributionMinimize agenda build up on FridayRequests for items to be added to the agenda as an additional item shall have met at least one of the following conditions:i) Government/agency deadlines;ii) Legal implications;iii) Contractual implications;iv) Financial implications; v) Council or General Committee direction; orvi) As directed by the CAO.Add - additional item condition: as directed by the CAO More efficient agenda distributionMinimize agenda build up on FridayAdditional items to the General Committee meeting agenda are available on each Friday preceding the Meeting, and further additional items may be provided up to and including the Meeting day.Additional Items to General Committee and Council agendas to be available on the Monday prior to a meeting, eliminating Friday additional items and limiting Tuesday additional itemsMore efficient agenda distributionMinimize agenda build up on FridayTo provide clarificationGeneral Committee Meeting agendas are generally available to Members on the Thursday that is twelve (12) days preceding a General Committee Meeting and are generally available to the public on the following Friday.13. Availability of Agendas14. Additional Items and Corrections1. DefinitionsGeneral Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 7 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationale17. Committee ReportRecommendations from Committees other than General Committee requiring Council approval will be submitted to the next regular General Committee Meeting in a Summary of Committee Recommendations report.Standing Committee section will be added to Council agendaCurrent separate report with Committee recommendations is confusing and procedurally difficult to deal with19. Meetings, e) Schedule of Meetingsi) Meetings shall take place in accordance with the “Meeting Schedule” as prepared by the Clerk and approved by Council.ii) All Council Meetings will generally be held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7 p.m. and General Committee Meetings will generally be held on the first and third Tuesday of each month at 7 p.m. Where a Council Meeting day is a public or civic holiday, Council will meet at the same hour on the Wednesday immediately following the holiday.iii) Unless otherwise determined by the Clerk, Council Closed Session will be scheduled at 5:45 p.m. immediately prior to a Council or General Committee Meeting, and will recess or adjourn at least twenty (20) minutes prior to the scheduled time of the meeting.iv) Only one (1) General Committee Meeting and one (1) Council Meeting will be held in each of July and August. v) Only one (1) General Committee Meeting, one (1) Council Meeting and one (1) Public Planning Meeting will be held in each of December and January.Delete sections iv), v)Meetings should proceed as indicated in the approved Meeting schedule; guidelines not required in Procedure By-lawGeneral Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 8 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationale20. Notice of Meetings, d) Emergency Meetings of Council or General Committeei) Notwithstanding any other provision in this Procedure By-law, the Mayor may, at any time, call or provide Notice of an emergency Meeting of Council or General Committee. An emergency Meeting of Council or General Committee is limited to business matters included in the Notice of Meeting.ii) The Clerk gives Notice of emergency Meetings of Council or General Committee by:(a) Providing Notice to Members in person, by telephone, by electronic mail, or in the form of an agenda that indicates the date and time of the Meeting and general nature of the matters to be discussed.DeleteCovered under Special Meetings provisionsGeneral Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 9 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationale20. Notice of Meetings, e) Cancellation or Postponement of Meetingsi) A Meeting may be cancelled or postponed where Quorum cannot be achieved, by Council resolution, in the event of an emergency, or where the Meeting is no longer required, as deemed by the Mayor and/or CAO.ii) The Clerk gives Notice of Cancellations or Postponements by: (a) Providing Notice to each Member no less than forty-eight (48) hours prior to the time set for the Meeting;iii) Providing Notice to the public of all Meetings of Council or General Committee regarding cancellations, and postponements by:(a) Posting a Notice on the Town website as soon as possible; (b) Sending a Notice via the Town’s social media accounts;(c) Posting a Notice on the Town’s regular advertising page in the local newspaper, if time permits; and(d) Where (c) cannot be achieved, posting a Notice at the main entrance to Town Hall.iv) Meetings of Committees may be cancelled or postponed by the Clerk, recording secretary, Chair or other assigned person where Quorum cannot be achieved, by Committee resolution, or in the event of an emergency.Add - information that refers to the Facility Closure - Inclement Weather/Power Failure PolicyTo add provisions to account for inclement weatherGeneral Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 10 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationale20. Notice of Meetings, g) Quorumi) A majority of members shall constitute a Quorum.ii) As soon as there is a Quorum after the time appointed for commencement of a Meeting, the Mayor or Chair will call the Meeting to order. If a Quorum is not present 30 minutes after the time appointed for commencement of a Meeting, the Clerk shall record the names of the Members present and the Meeting shall not commence or proceed.Move to Section 19. MeetingsTo improve flow of by-law20. Notice of Meetings, h) Late Arrivali) If a Member arrives late at a Meeting, any prior discussion is not reviewed without the consent of the Members present.Move to Section 19. MeetingsTo improve flow of by-lawi) Council or a Committee may, by Resolution, close a Meeting or part of a Meeting to the public in accordance with section 239 of the Municipal Act, 2001 if the subject matter being considered is:(a) The security of the property of the Town or local board;(b) Personal matters about an identifiable individual, including Town or local board employees;(c) A proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the Town or local board;(d) Labour relations or employee negotiations;(e) Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board;(f) Advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose;(g) A matter in respect of which a Council, Board, Committee or other body may hold a closed meeting under another Act;Delete list from section i)Revise section ii)This list will expand upon proclamation of Bill 68. By referring to the Municipal Act and not having a specific list, this section of the Procedure By-law will not have to be amended for the remainder of the term of Council21. Closed Session, a) Matters of Closed SessionGeneral Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 11 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationale21. Closed Session, b) Notice of Closed Sessioni) Where a matter may be considered by Council or General Committee for discussion in Closed Session, wherever possible, written Notice will include:(a) The fact that the Meeting will be closed to the public as provided for in the Municipal Act, 2001; (b) The general nature of the matter to be considered at the Closed Session.Specify that written notice of the Closed Session meeting will be provided through the publishing of the agendaTo provide clarification21. Closed Session, f) Scheduling of Closed Sessioni) Closed Session shall be scheduled as indicated in the Schedule of Meetings Section of this Procedure By-law.DeleteCovered under Meeting Schedule(h) The Meeting is held for the purpose of educating or training the Members and no Member discusses or otherwise deals with any matter in a way that materially advances the business or decision-making of Council, Local Board or Committee.ii) Council or a Committee shall also resolve into a Closed Session to the public for the following purposes:(a) A request under the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, if the Council, board, commission or other body is the head of an institution for the purposes of that Act.(b) An ongoing investigation respecting the municipality, a local board or a municipally-controlled corporation by the Ombudsman appointed under the Ombudsman Act, an Ombudsman referred to in subsection 223.13 (1) of the Municipal Act, 2001, or the investigator referred to in subsection 239.2 (1) of the Municipal Act, 2001. General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 12 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationaleReplace "Presentations" to "Community Announcements"To make by-law more clear and better reflect type of information relayed during "Presentations"Add "Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes" sectionTo provide a more efficient way of dealing with Advisory Committee recommendationsReplace "Presentations" with "Community Announcements"To make by-law more clear and better reflect type of information relayed during "Presentations"Add "Standing Committee Reports" sectionTo improve flow of agenda and a more clear meeting minutes documentDelete "Notice of Motion" SectionNotices of Motion to be allowed at General Committee only. If there is a time sensitive matter, Council could add it as a Motion.24. Order of Business - General Committeea) The order of business of General Committee is set out in the agenda, as follows, where provided for:i) Approval of the Agendaii) Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereofiii) Community Announcementsiv) Delegationsv) Consent Agendavi) Advisory Committee Meeting Minutesvii) Consideration of Items Requiring Discussion (Regular Agenda)viii) Notices of Motionix) New Businessx) Closed Session xi) Adjournment25. Order of Business - Councila) The order of business for the Council is set out in the agenda as follows, where provided for:i) Approval of the Agendaii) Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereofiii) Community Announcementsiv) Delegationsv) Consent Agendavi) Standing Committee Reportsvii) Consideration of Items Requiring Discussion (Regular Agenda)vii) Notices of Motionviii) MotionsGeneral Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 13 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationaleAdd - Order of business for other meetings is at the discretion of the ClerkTo provide clarification26. Record of Proceedingsa) The Clerk records the minutes of Meetings of General Committee and Council without note or comment. The minutes record:i) The date, time and location of the Meeting;ii) The name of the Chair and a record of the attendance at the Meeting;iii) The name and nature of presenters and Delegations;iv) All Resolutions, decisions and other proceedings of the Meeting; and,v) Administrative references, including by-law, report, Motion and policy indexes.Delete section v)Not requiredix) Regional Reportx) New Business xi) Public Service Announcementsxii) By-lawsxiii) Closed Sessionxiv) Confirming By-lawxv) AdjournmentGeneral Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 14 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationale27. Minutesa) Minutes of each Meeting of Council are presented to the subsequent regular Meeting of Council for approval. The approved minutes form the official record of the meeting.b) A report of the General Committee is submitted to the next regular Council meeting, for consideration of the recommendations. The report from General Committee that is presented to Council shall not contain the mover or seconder on each item but rather shall only show recommendations endorsed by the General Committee. c) Approved minutes of Council and report of the General Committee will be posted on the Town’s website as they become available.d) Minutes of Committees, as designated by Council, are submitted to General Committee for Council receipt. e) After the Council minutes have been approved by Council, they shall be signed by the Mayor and Clerk.f) The receipt of minutes from Committees by Council does not constitute endorsement by the Town of any recommendations or actions contained in the minutes.g) The Clerk shall ensure that the minutes of each Meeting are made available to Members within a reasonable amount of time after the holding of such Meeting.Revise order - d), f), b), a), e), c), g).To improve flow of by-lawGeneral Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 15 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationale29. Open Foruma) In the Open Forum that occurs fifteen (15) minutes prior to the formal portion of a General Committee Meeting, any individual may address General Committee to make informal inquiries or to comment on matters of municipal business. Persons speaking at the Open Forum are shall be required to sign the Open Forum Register held by the Clerk or recording secretary prior to being permitted to address Council, and shall be limited to a maximum of five (5) minutes each. b) Open Forum will not be included in the Meeting minutes, and will not be part of the live streaming of the Meeting.c) Generally, no Motions are passed related to matters raised during Open Forum.Delete section c)Not requiredGeneral Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 16 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationale30. Declarations of Pecuniary Interesta) Members are required to make Declarations of Pecuniary Interest in accordance with the requirements of the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act and/or other relevant legislation. b) Where a Meeting is not open to the public, in addition to complying with the requirements set out in the Closed Session Section of this Procedure By-law, the Member shall leave the Meeting or the part of the Meeting during which the matter is under consideration.c) Where the interest of a Member has not been disclosed by reason of the Member’s absence from a particular Meeting, the Member shall disclose the Member’s interest and otherwise comply at the first Meeting of Council or Committee, as the case may be, attended by the Member after the particular Meeting.d) The Clerk shall record the particulars of any disclosure of pecuniary interest and general nature thereof made by a Member, and this record shall appear in the minutes of that Meeting.Add provisions to reflect requirement of written notice to be submitted to the Clerk's OfficeChanges are required as part of Bill 68, specifically written notice of conflict and public record of declared pecuniary interestsGeneral Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 17 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationaleRevise section to Presentations and Community UpdatesTo make by-law more clear and better reflect type of information relayed during "Presentations"Revise section name to "Community Updatess";To make by-law more clear and better reflect type of information relayed during "Presentations"Delete wording in section i)To provide clarificationAdd requests to be added to Commiunity Updates must be submitted to the Clerk's Office at least six weeks in advance of the meeting, and material must be submitted at least two weeks prior to the meeting;To streamline deadlines and processes and encourage effective agenda managementRevise section iv) to maximum time limit of five (5) minutes;Meeting efficiencyAdd - Limit number of times group or individual may appear before at General Committee and/or Council, at the discretion of the Town ClerkMeeting efficiencyDelete sections ii) and iii)Not required31. Presentations and Community Updates, a) Staff Presentationsi) Staff presentations, if related to a report on the agenda shall occur at the time the report is discussed. Presentations by staff at Meetings shall be a maximum of ten (10) minutes. i) Presentations Community Updates may be made by third-parties invited by staff or other government agency presentations to Council or General Committee on matters of interest to the Town, as well as awards, certificates, grants and other recognitions presented to/by the Town. Such presentations are received or presented by the Chair.ii) Where a third-party presentation involves an item on an agenda, the item shall be heard at the appropriate time in the agenda with the report brought forward for consideration immediately after the presentation has been made. iii) Presentation material shall be submitted to the Clerk in an electronic format prior to the 4:30 p.m. on the Friday prior to the meeting date.iv) Presentations Community Updates may be up to ten (10) five (5) minutes. The consent of Council or General Committee is required to extend a presentation beyond ten (10) five (5) minutes.31. Presentations and Community Updates, b) Other Presentations Community UpdatesGeneral Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 18 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationaleIndicate 'business' days in reference to deadlines To provide clarificationRevise section ii) and iii) - All delegation requests and supporting material must be provided no later than 9 a.m. one business days prior to a meeting.To streamline deadlinesRevise section iv) to reflect that any financial requests should first be directed to the annual Budget Input Session.To put process around financial asksAdd - Delegation requests received after the deadline or limit has been reached will be acknowledged by the Clerk but not placed on an AgendaTo provide clarificationAdd to Section ix) limit of four (4) Delegates for General Committee, limit of two (2) Delegates at CouncilMeeting efficiencyDelete sections x), and xi)Not requiredAdd - No delegations regarding proposals for Zoning By-law Amendment applications for the remainder of the two-year moratorium as outlined in Section 34 (10.0.0.1) of the Planning Act.To ensure merits of the application are not discussed prior to the Planning processAdd - No active Planning-related delegations at CouncilNew section to be added, depending on Meeting structure and schedulei) Delegates shall be encouraged to appear at the appropriate Committee first rather than Council. ii) Anyone wishing to appear before General Committee or Council shall register as a delegate by submitting the prescribed form to the Clerk no later than 4:30 p.m. two (2) days 9 a.m. one (1) business day prior to the scheduled Meeting date.iii) Delegates shall advise the Clerk that the audio visual equipment will be required and shall submit supporting material to the Clerk in an electronic format no later than 4:30 p.m. on the Friday two (2) business days 9 a.m. one (1) business day prior to the Meeting date. iv) Delegates requesting specific financial assistance or services in-kind from General Committee or Council must submit a detailed written request to the Clerk prior to the Meeting, which will be forwarded to the appropriate department for review. A decision will not be made at the Meeting where the Delegation is heard.v) The Clerk shall give due consideration to the length of the agenda and the number of delegations and shall advise to the requester the earliest possible date when their delegation may be accommodated. A limit of four (4) delegations will be considered at a meeting of General Committee and a limit of three (3) two (2) delegations will be considered at a Meeting of Council.32. Delegations, a) General ProvisionsGeneral Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 19 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationaleAdd - wording around delegations from members of the same group, limit to oneTo provide clarification and promote meeting efficiency Add - Provision that allows Town Clerk to manage number of times a delegation appears before General Committee and CouncilMeeting efficiencyvi) Delegations at General Committee and Council meetings shall be on a subject that is within the jurisdiction or influence of local government. Delegations at a Meeting of Council shall be related to an item of business on the agenda. vii) Delegates shall refrain from making statements or comments that are, in the opinion of the Chair, frivolous or vexatious in nature.viii) Delegates shall be restricted to a speaking limit of five (5) minutes, regardless of whether they are representing an organization, association or other group. ix) The consent of Council or General Committee is required to grant a delegation one (1) extension of up to five (5) minutes at a Council or General Committee meeting, and to consider more than three (3) delegations at a Council meeting.x) A Delegation not on the agenda shall not be heard without the consent of at least a two-thirds majority of the Members present.xi) Members of General Committee and Council are permitted to ask the individual making a Delegation questions only for clarification and to obtain additional relevant informationxii) Delegates who appear before General Committee are not permitted to make a Delegation in relation to the same item at the following Council meeting, but may submit written material to Members of Council through the Clerk’s Office. General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 20 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationale32. Delegations, b) Delegations at General Committeei) Individuals who request to make a Delegation may be encouraged by a Member or staff to consider resolving an issue or concern with staff in lieu of, or prior to, submitting a Delegation request.ii) Where there are numerous delegates taking the same position on a matter, they are encouraged to select a spokesperson to present their views. Delegates are encouraged not to repeat information presented by an earlier Delegation.DeleteCovered in previous section32. Delegations, c) Delegations at Council Meetingsi) Anyone wishing to speak on an item that is not on the Council agenda shall be directed to appear at the Open Forum session that precedes the General Committee Meetings. Alternatively, the delegation may be placed on a Committee agenda to address an issue that is not on the Council agenda.Move to Section 32. a)To improve flow of by-law32. Delegations, d) Delegations at Public Planning Meetingsi) Any person may speak on a matter at a Public Planning Meeting provided that the spokesperson is speaking on an item that is contained in the agenda. The delegate shall not speak for more than five (5) minutes, but may have an opportunity to speak more than once on the agenda item.Revise as requiredRevision dependent on Meeting structure and scheduleGeneral Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 21 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationaleDelete sections ii), iiiNot requiredAdd - Items may be added to the Consent Agenda at the discretion of the CAO or Town ClerkTo clarify process33. Consent Agenda, b)Simple questions Questions of clarification may be asked by Members about any Consent item during the adoption of the Consent Agenda without requiring a separate vote.Replace 'simple questions' with 'questions of clarification'Improved wording33. Consent Agenda, f)All recommendations from the General Committee will be placed on the Consent Agenda of the next regular Council Meeting, unless a request is made at the General Committee Meeting to consider a recommendation under Consideration of Items Requiring Discussion.DeleteStanding Committee Reports section to be added.33. Consent Agenda, a)Consent Agenda will include the following items that do not have presentations or delegations:i) Receipt of the Minutes (i.e. Special Council, Workshop, Closed Session) (Council Meeting agenda only);ii) Advisory Committee Minutes;iii) Staff Reports that require no action other than receiving for information; iv) Procurement items that are within the approved budget;v) Communications addressed to Council; andvi) Items as directed by the CAO or Town Clerk.General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 22 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationaleRevise as requiredChanges may be required to fit new agenda publishing timeframesAdd - Notice of Motion must be accompanied by written confirmation of a seconder when submitted to the Clerk's OfficeSuggested change based on feedbackReplace 'Motion' with 'Notice of Motion' Corrected wordingDelete sections d) ii)Simplify processa) A Member desiring to introduce a subject for discussion by Council will provide the proposed Notice of Motion to the Clerk in writing for inclusion in a regular agenda of General Committee or Council by 12 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting.b) The Motions for Which Notice Has Been Given will be included on the next Council agenda for consideration and disposition.c) The CAO or staff may be requested to comment on the Motion raised in this Section, but no staff report will be prepared unless the Motion is referred to staff for a further report.d) It is the duty of the Member to:i) Prepare the proposed Notice of Motion in writing.ii) Submit the proposed Motion to the Clerk by 12 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting.iii) Ensure the content of the proposed Motion allows for it to be published on a public agenda. 34. Notice of MotionGeneral Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 23 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationale37. New Businessa) Any Member of Council or a Committee, at any Meeting, may present and introduce any matter of New Business during the New Business portion of the Meeting, and shall have regard to the following guidelines:i) Members are encouraged to raise operational matters prior to the Meeting through the CAO, Director or appropriate staff member; ii) Members are discouraged from raising substantive policy matters, in particular consideration of corporate policies or by-laws; and,iii) Members of Council are encouraged to raise announcements and community events under the Public Service Announcements portion of the Council agenda.Move to before Section 36. Public Service AnnouncementsTo improve flow of by-lawDelete section b)Not required - all votes to waive procedure require a 2/3 majorityAdd - motion to extend must refer to a specific end timeMeeting efficiencyAdd - By-laws and Confirming by-law to be voted on prior to adjournmentTo ensure approval of time sensitive By-laws and the Confirming By-lawa) No item of business shall be considered at a Meeting of Council or General Committee after 10:30 p.m. unless a majority of the Members present enact a resolution to extend the hour.b) If Council or General Committee is still in session at 11 p.m., it shall be adjourned unless two-thirds of the Members present enact a resolution to extend the Meeting (By-law No. 5968-17). 39. AdjournmentGeneral Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 24 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationaleSimplify processa) Correspondence addressed to the Mayor and Council shall be acknowledged by the Clerk and sent directly to the appropriate Committee or Director for response or action.b) Copies of such correspondence shall also be distributed to Members of Council and the CAO.c) Where correspondence is not requested to be included in a Council or General Committee agenda, it is circulated by the Clerk to Members of Council, the CAO, Directors and applicable staff for their information, and forms a part of the Clerk’s records.d) Where correspondence has been requested to be included on a Council or General Committee Meeting agenda or on the request of a Member of Council to the Clerk, correspondence is placed on the General Committee meeting agenda for consideration. Where required due to urgency or timing, correspondence may be considered directly by Council as an Additional Item.e) Staff may prepare recommendations related to the matter for Council’s consideration.f) Council and staff will direct to the Clerk correspondence clearly intended to be considered as part of an agenda of Council or General Committee.Delete section a), b), e), f), g), and h)40. CorrespondenceGeneral Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 25 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationaleg) The Clerk is required to verify whether it is the intent of an individual to include his/her correspondence on a public agenda. For reasons of privacy, irrelevant personal information will be severed from correspondence. General correspondence between Councillors or staff, and constituents or stakeholders, will not be included unless the Clerk is satisfied it was clearly the individual’s intent to include his/her correspondence on a public agenda.h) Correspondence related to items already decided on by Council will form a part of the Clerk’s records and be circulated to Members of Council, but not placed on an agenda.i) Correspondence must be legible and not contain any defamatory statements. Anonymous correspondence will not be acknowledged, circulated, or placed on an agenda.j) The Council’s receipt of correspondence does not constitute endorsement of the correspondence by the Town of any recommendations it may contain or actions it may advocate.General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 26 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationale41. Petitionsa) Petitions may be submitted to the Clerk and will include a minimum of two (2) persons and their respective addresses, and a clear statement of purpose for the petition.b) The request conveyed in the petition will be considered by General Committee for disposition. Where required due to urgency or timing, petitions may be considered directly by Council.c) For reasons of privacy, the names and addresses included with the petition will be provided to Members, but not published in an agenda of the General Committee or Council.d) Staff may prepare recommendations related to the matter for Council’s consideration.e) The Town is not accountable for the accuracy or reliability of petitions that are submitted.Delete section c)Simplify processGeneral Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 27 of 50
Attachment No. 1 - Proposed Amendments to Procedure By-law No. 5820-16, as amendedProcedure By-law SectionSection Text (if applicable)ChangeRationale44. Procedures Concerning Motionsi) Motion to Amendi) The purpose of this Motion is to modify a Motion. It cannot be used to directly contradict or negate the effect of another Motion.ii) A Motion to amend:(a) Is to be open to debate; and,(b) Is to be relevant to the main Motion; and(c) Can be applied to a Motion at one time, but that amendment may be amended [by a secondary amendment], which cannot be amended.iii) If it is not considered a “Friendly Amendment,” then the Motion to amend:(a) If more than one, will be put to a vote in the reverse order to that in which they were moved;(b) Will be decided upon or withdrawn before the main Motion is put to the vote;(c) Will not be amended more than once, provided that further amendments may be made to the main Motion; and,(d) Will not be directly contrary to the main Motion.Revise section i) Motion to Amend Provide clearer wording
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Item R3 Page 28 of 50
Public Release
September 29, 2017
Town of Aurora
General Committee
Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, October 3, 2017
7 p.m., Council Chambers
NOTE: This is a sample agenda index being provided as an attachment to
Report No. CS17-037.
Councillor Abel in the Chair
1.Approval of the Agenda
Recommended:
That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved.
2.Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
3.Community Announcements
4.Delegations
(a) Craig Mather, President, Suzanne Haines, Executive Director, and
Stephanie Nicolò, Program, Gallery and Volunteer Services Coordinator,
Aurora Cultural Centre
Re: Item R4 – PRCS17-032 – Canada 150 Art Installation at Church Street
School at 22 Church Street
Attachment No. 2
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R3
Page 29 of 50
General Committee Meeting Agenda (Revised)
Tuesday, October 3, 2017 Page 2 of 6
5. Consent Agenda
Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine or no longer require
further discussion, and are enacted in one motion. The exception to this rule is that a
Member may request for one or more items to be removed from the Consent Agenda
for separate discussion and action.
Recommended:
That the following Consent Agenda Items, C1 to C5 inclusive, be approved:
C1. FS17-020 – 2016 Year End Development Charges Statement
(Information Report dated May 16, 2017, included on agenda per Member of
Council request)
Recommended:
1. That Report No. FS17-020 be received for information.
C2. FS17-039 – Interim Operating Budget Forecast – as at July 31, 2017
(Information Report dated September 19, 2017, included on agenda per
Member of Council request)
Recommended:
1. That Report No. FS17-039 be received for information.
C3. PBS17-067 – Planning Applications Status List
(Information Report dated September 19, 2017, included on agenda per
Member of Council request)
Recommended:
1. That Report No. PBS17-067 be received for information.
C4. Memorandum from Mayor Dawe
Re: Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority Board Meeting
Highlights of July 28, 2017
(Added Item)
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R3
Page 30 of 50
General Committee Meeting Agenda (Revised)
Tuesday, October 3, 2017 Page 3 of 6
Recommended:
1. That the memorandum regarding Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority
Board Meeting Highlights of July 28, 2017, be received for information.
6. Advisory Committee Minutes
A1. Community Recognition Review Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of
August 21, 2017
Recommended:
1. That the Community Recognition Review Advisory Committee meeting
minutes of August 21, 2017, be received; and
2. That the Community Recognition Review Advisory Committee
Recommend to Council:
(a) That…
7. Consideration of Items Requiring Discussion (Regular Agenda)
R1. CAO17-006 – Engagement of Review of Joint Operations Centre (JOC)
Project and Costs
Recommended:
1. That Report No. CAO17-006 be received; and
2. That Internal Audit Services of the Region of York be engaged to review
and report on the JOC Project and Costs using Brook Laker & Associates
as outlined in Report No. CAO17-006, for a total fee of $29,000 excluding
HST, to be funded from within expected 2017 operating surplus.
R2. FS17-043 – Capital Projects Status and Closures as of July 31, 2017
Recommended:
1. That Report No. FS17-043 be received; and
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R3
Page 31 of 50
General Committee Meeting Agenda (Revised)
Tuesday, October 3, 2017 Page 4 of 6
2. That the Capital Project closures and Capital funding adjustments outlined
in Attachments #1 and #2 be approved.
R3. FS17-044 – 2018 Fees and Charges Update
Recommended:
1. That Report No. FS17-044 be received; and
2. That the 2018 Fees and Charges for applications, permits, use of Town
property, the sale of Town publications and for the prescribed service
charges for administrative matters as itemized on the attached schedules
be approved:
Schedule A – General Fees and Charges
Schedule B – Planning and Building Services
Schedule C – Corporate Services
Schedule D – Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
Schedule E – Infrastructure and Environmental Services
Schedule F – Financial Services; and
3. That the necessary by-law be enacted at a future Council meeting.
R4. PRCS17-032 – Canada 150 Art Installation at Church Street School at 22
Church Street
Recommended:
1. That Report No. PRCS17-032 be received; and
2. That the installation of the Canada 150 Milestones Mural: A Community Art
Project art installation on the southwest lawn of Church Street School at 22
Church Street be approved in the amount of $2,700, funded from the
Property Improvement Operating Account 1-4-07302-5037; and
3. That the Mayor and Town Clerk be authorized to execute the funding
Agreement between the Town of Aurora and the Ontario Heritage Trust,
including any and all documents and ancillary agreements required to give
effect to same.
R5. PBS17-076 – Proposal for Zoning By-law Amendment Applications
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R3
Page 32 of 50
General Committee Meeting Agenda (Revised)
Tuesday, October 3, 2017 Page 5 of 6
Recommended:
1. That Report No. PBS17-076 be received; and
2. That Council accept the Zoning By-law Amendment Application related to
the following Zoning By-law Proposal:
(a) Shimvest Investments Limited (271 Holladay Drive)
R6. CS17-030 – Implications of the Provincial Government’s Proposed
Changes to Employment Standards Legislation on the Town
(Information Report dated September 19, 2017, included on agenda per
Member of Council request)
Recommended:
1. That Report No. CS17-030 be received for information.
R7. Correspondence from Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA)
dated September 29, 2017, Re: Appointments to the TRCA Regional
Watershed Alliance 2017-2021
Recommended:
1. That the correspondence from Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
(TRCA) dated September 29, 2017, regarding Appointments to the TRCA
Watershed Alliance 2017-2021, be received; and
2. That Council provide direction.
7. Notices of Motion
(a) Mayor Dawe
Re: Federal Legalization of Recreational Cannabis
(Added Item)
8. New Business
9. Closed Session
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R3
Page 33 of 50
General Committee Meeting Agenda (Revised)
Tuesday, October 3, 2017 Page 6 of 6
10.Adjournment
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R3
Page 34 of 50
Public Release
October 6, 2017
Town of Aurora
Council Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, October 10, 2017
7 p.m., Council Chambers
NOTE: This is a sample agenda index being provided as an attachment to
Report No. CS17-037.
1. Approval of the Agenda
Recommended:
That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved.
2. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
3. Community Announcements
4. Delegations
5. Consent Agenda
Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine or no longer require
further discussion, and are enacted in one motion. The exception to this rule is that
a Member may request for one or more items to be removed from the Consent
Agenda for separate discussion and action.
Recommended:
That the following Consent Agenda Items, C1 to C5 inclusive, be approved:
C1. Council Meeting Minutes of September 26, 2017
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R3
Page 35 of 50
Council Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, October 10, 2017 Page 2 of 4
Recommended:
1. That the Council meeting minutes of September 26, 2017, be adopted as
printed and circulated.
C3. Council Closed Session Minutes of September 19 and September 26
(Continued October 3), 2017 (confidential attachment)
Recommended:
1. That the Council Closed Session minutes of September 19 and
September 26 (Continued October 3), 2017, be adopted as printed and
circulated.
C4. Council Closed Session Public Minutes of September 19 and
September 26 (Continued October 3), 2017
Recommended:
1. That the Council Closed Session Public minutes of September 19 and
September 26 (Continued October 3), 2017, be adopted as printed and
circulated.
C5. Budget Committee Meeting Report of May 31, 2017
Recommended:
1. That the Budget Committee Meeting Report of May 31, 2017, be
received for information.
6. Standing Committee Reports
S1. General Committee Meeting Report of October 3, 2017
Recommended:
1. That the General Committee meeting report of October 3, 2017, be
received and the recommendations carried by the Committee approved.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R3
Page 36 of 50
Council Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, October 10, 2017 Page 3 of 4
S2. Budget Committee Meeting Report of October 7, 2017
Recommended:
2.That the Budget Committee meeting report of October 7, 2017, be
received and the recommendations carried by the Committee approved.
7.Consideration of Items Requiring Discussion (Regular Agenda)
8.Motions
(a) Mayor Dawe
Re: Federal Legalization of Recreational Cannabis
9.Regional Report
York Regional Council Highlights – September 21, 2017
Recommended:
That the Regional Report of September 21, 2017, be received for information.
10.New Business
11.Public Service Announcements
12.By-laws
13.Closed Session
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R3
Page 37 of 50
Council Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, October 10, 2017 Page 4 of 4
14.Confirming By-law
Recommended:
That the following confirming by-law be enacted:
By-law Number XXXX-17 Being a By-law to Confirm Actions by Council
Resulting from a Council Meeting on October 10, 2017.
15.Adjournment
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R3
Page 38 of 50
(CC) Council Chambers (1
st floor)(HR) Holland Room (1st floor) (LR) Leksand Room (1st floor) (TR) Tannery Room (2nd floor)
Revision: Option 1
January 2018
S unday M onday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday F riday Saturday
1 2 3 4 5 6
New Year’s
Day
Hanukkah (Last Day)
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
9:30 a.m. Joint Council
Committee (Newmarket)
4 p.m. Accessibility
Advisory Committee (HR)
7 p.m. Aurora Cultural
Centre Board
7 p.m. Committee of
Adjustment (CC)
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
7 p.m. Aurora Public
Library Board
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. General
Committee (CC)
5:30 p.m. Finance
Advisory Committee (HR)
7 p.m. Public Planning
(CC)
28 29 30 31 5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. Council (CC)
Attachment No. 3 General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R3 Page 39 of 50
(CC) Council Chambers (1st floor) (HR) Holland Room (1st floor) (LR) Leksand Room (1st floor) (TR) Tannery Room (2nd floor)
Revision: Option 1
February 2018
Sunday M onday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday S aturday
1 2 3
7 p.m. Environmental
Advisory Committee (HR)
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. General
Committee (CC)
4 p.m. Accessibility
Advisory Committee (HR)
7 p.m. Committee of
Adjustment (CC)
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
7 p.m. Heritage
Advisory Committee (HR)
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. Council (CC)
7 p.m. Aurora Cultural
Centre Board
7 p.m. Parks,
Recreation and
Cultural Services
Advisory Committee (HR)
10 a.m. Trails and
Active Transportation
Committee (CC)
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Family
Day
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. General
Committee (CC)
7 p.m. Aurora Public
Library Board
25 26 27 28
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. Council (CC)
5:30 p.m. Finance
Advisory Committee (HR)
7 p.m. Public Planning
(CC)
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R3 Page 40 of 50
(CC) Council Chambers (1st floor) (HR) Holland Room (1st floor) (LR) Leksand Room (1st floor) (TR) Tannery Room (2nd floor)
Revision: Option 1
Mar ch 2018
S unday M onday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday F riday Saturday
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7 p.m. Heritage
Advisory Committee (HR)
9:30 a.m. Joint Council
Committee (HR)
4 p.m. Accessibility
Advisory Committee (HR)
8 p.m. Aurora Cultural
Centre Board
7 p.m. Committee of
Adjustment (CC)
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
March Break March Break March Break March Break March Break
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. General
Committee (CC)
7 p.m. Aurora Public
Library Board
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. Council (CC)
5:30 p.m. Finance
Advisory Committee (HR)
7 p.m. Public Planning
(CC)
Good
Friday General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R3 Page 41 of 50
(CC) Council Chambers (1st floor) (HR) Holland Room (1st floor) (LR) Leksand Room (1st floor) (TR) Tannery Room (2nd floor)
Revision: Option 1
April 2018
S unday M onday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday F riday Saturday
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Easter
Sunday
Easter
Monday
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. General
Committee (CC)
4 p.m. Accessibility
Advisory Committee (HR)
7 p.m. Environmental
Advisory Committee (HR)
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
7 p.m. Heritage
Advisory Committee (HR)
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. Council (CC)
Passover (First Day)
7 p.m. Aurora Cultural
Centre Board
7 p.m. Committee of
Adjustment (CC)
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. General
Committee (CC)
Passover (Last Day)
7 p.m. Aurora Public
Library Board
7 p.m. Parks,
Recreation and
Cultural Services
Advisory Committee (HR)
10 a.m. Trails and
Active Transportation
Committee (CC)
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. Council (CC)
5:30 p.m. Finance
Advisory Committee (HR)
7 p.m. Public Planning
(CC)
29 30
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R3 Page 42 of 50
(CC) Council Chambers (1st floor) (HR) Holland Room (1st floor) (LR) Leksand Room (1st floor) (TR) Tannery Room (2nd floor)
Revision: Option 1
May 2018
S unday M onday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday F riday Saturday
1 2 3 4 5
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. General
Committee (CC)
Municipal Election
Nominations Begin Art Show Art Show Art Show Art Show
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Art Show
9:30 a.m. Joint Council
Committee (Newmarket)
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. Council (CC)
4 p.m. Accessibility
Advisory Committee (HR)
7 p.m. Aurora Cultural
Centre Board
7 p.m. Committee of
Adjustment (CC)
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
7 p.m. Heritage
Advisory Committee
(HR)
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. General
Committee (CC)
7 p.m. Aurora Public
Library Board
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Victoria
Day
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. Council (CC)
5:30 p.m. Finance
Advisory Committee (HR)
7 p.m. Public Planning
(CC)
27 28 29 30 31
FCM Conference
Halifax
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R3 Page 43 of 50
(CC) Council Chambers (1st floor) (HR) Holland Room (1st floor) (LR) Leksand Room (1st floor) (TR) Tannery Room (2nd floor)
Revision: Option 1
June 2018
S unday M onday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday S aturday
1 2
FCM FCM
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
FCM
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. General
Committee (CC)
4 p.m. Accessibility
Advisory Committee (HR)
7 p.m. Environmental
Advisory Committee (HR)
7 p.m. Committee of
Adjustment (CC)
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
7 p.m. Heritage
Advisory Committee (HR)
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. Council (CC)
8 p.m. Aurora Cultural
Centre Board
10 a.m. Trails and
Active Transportation
Committee (CC)
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. General
Committee (CC)
7 p.m. Aurora Public
Library Board
7 p.m. Parks,
Recreation and
Cultural Services
Advisory Committee (HR)
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
9:30 a.m. Joint Council
Committee (HR)
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
6:30 p.m. Audit
Committee (CC)
7 p.m. Council (CC)
5:30 p.m. Finance
Advisory Committee (HR)
7 p.m. Public Planning
(CC)
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R3 Page 44 of 50
(CC) Council Chambers (1st floor) (HR) Holland Room (1st floor) (LR) Leksand Room (1st floor) (TR) Tannery Room (2nd floor)
Revision: Option 1
July 2018
Sunday M onday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday F riday Saturday
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Canada
Day
To wn Hall Closed
in lieu of Canada Day
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
7 p.m. Heritage
Advisory Committee (HR)
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. General
Committee (CC)
7 p.m. Aurora Cultural
Centre Board
7 p.m. Committee of
Adjustment (CC)
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. Council (CC)
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Municipal Election
Nomination Day
29 30 31
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R3 Page 45 of 50
(CC) Council Chambers (1st floor) (HR) Holland Room (1st floor) (LR) Leksand Room (1st floor) (TR) Tannery Room (2nd floor)
Revision: Option 1
August 2018
Sunday M onday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday F riday Saturday
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Civic
Holiday
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (LR)
7 p.m. General
Committee (CC)
7 p.m. Aurora Cultural
Centre Board
7 p.m. Committee of
Adjustment (CC)
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (LR)
7 p.m. Council (CC)
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
AMO
Conference
Ottawa AMO AMO AMO
26 27 28 29 30 31
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R3 Page 46 of 50
(CC) Council Chambers (1st floor) (HR) Holland Room (1st floor) (LR) Leksand Room (1st floor) (TR) Tannery Room (2nd floor)
Revision: Option 1
September 2018
S unday M onday Tuesday Wednesday T hursday F riday Saturday
2 3 4 5 6 7 1/8
Labour
Day
9:30 a.m. Joint Council
Committee (Newmarket)
7 p.m. Heritage
Advisory Committee (LR)
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Rosh Hashanah
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (LR)
7 p.m. General
Committee (CC)
8 p.m. Aurora Cultural
Centre Board
7 p.m. Committee of
Adjustment (CC)
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (LR)
7 p.m. Council (CC)
7 p.m. Aurora Public
Library Board
Yom Kippur
23/30 24 25 26 27 28 29
7 p.m. Public Planning
(CC)
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R3 Page 47 of 50
(CC) Council Chambers (1st floor) (HR) Holland Room (1st floor) (LR) Leksand Room (1st floor) (TR) Tannery Room (2nd floor)
Revision: Option 1
October 2018
S unday M onday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday S aturday
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Thanksgiving
Day
7 p.m. Aurora Cultural
Centre Board
7 p.m. Committee of
Adjustment (CC)
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
7 p.m. Aurora Public
Library Board
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Municipal Election
Voting Day
28 29 30 31
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R3 Page 48 of 50
(CC) Council Chambers (1st floor) (HR) Holland Room (1st floor) (LR) Leksand Room (1st floor) (TR) Tannery Room (2nd floor)
Revision: Option 1
November 2018
S unday M onday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7 p.m. Aurora Cultural
Centre Board
7 p.m. Committee of
Adjustment (CC)
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Remembrance
Day
7 p.m. Aurora Public
Library Board
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (LR)
7 p.m. Council (CC)
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R3 Page 49 of 50
(CC) Council Chambers (1st floor) (HR) Holland Room (1st floor) (LR) Leksand Room (1st floor) (TR) Tannery Room (2nd floor)
Revision: Option 1
December 2018
Sunday M onday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday S aturday
2 3 4 5 6 7 1/8
Hanukkah (First Day)
7 p.m. Council
Inaugural (CC)
Christmas Tree
Lighting Ceremony
7 p.m. Committee of
Adjustment (CC)
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Hanukkah (Last Day)
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. General
Committee (CC)
8 p.m. Aurora Cultural
Centre Board
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
5:45 p.m. Council Closed
Session (if required) (HR)
7 p.m. Council (CC)
7 p.m. Aurora Public
Library Board
7 p.m. Public Planning
(CC)
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Christmas Eve
Christmas
Day
Boxing
Day
To wn Hall Closed To wn Hall Closed
30 31
New Year’s Eve
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R3 Page 50 of 50
Town of Aurora
General Committee Report No. PBS17-084
Subject: 2018 Planning Applications Fees
Prepared by: Glen Letman, Manager of Development Planning
Department: Planning and Building Services
Date: November 21, 2017
Recommendations
1. THAT Report No. PBS17-084 be received; and
2. THAT in accordance with Section 69 of the Planning Act Council update the
Planning Application Fees Bylaw as shown on attached Schedule A, which
increases the 2018 fees for processing of Planning Applications by 2.1%
(generally) to reflect the Consumer Price Index; and modest verifiable
increases to the Official Plan, Zoning Bylaw and Subdivision and
Condominium base fees; and
3. That the amending Planning Application Fees Bylaw be brought forward to a
future Council meeting for enactment; and
4. AND THAT Council direct staff to review and amend the Planning Fee
schedule an annual basis.
Executive Summary
The purpose of this report is to seek Council approval of the 2018 Planning Application
Fees.
• On November 1, 2016 General Committee received Report No. PBS16-093 as
an update to the Town’s current Fees and Charges Bylaw;
• Within that report the Planning Applications fees were recommended to be
increased of 2.1% (rounded) for development planning application fees for 2017.
• The Town’s Director of Financial Services advises that the Consumer Price Index
rose by the same 2.1% over the past year (June to June) which is recommended
to be applied to the 2018 Panning Application fees.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R4
Page 1 of 6
November 21, 2017 Page 2 of 4 Report No. PBS17-084
• A 10% Base Fee is proposed to be increased for Official Plan, Zoning,
Subdivision and Condominium applications.
• Council direction is required to update the 2018 Planning and Building Services
Planning Application Fees, which will be brought forward as a Bylaw.
Background
The Planning and Building Services Planning Application fee is set out in a separate
Fees Bylaw to the Towns General Fees and Charges Bylaw brought forward by
Financial Services.
On November 12, 2013 Council directed that an annual Planning Application fee be
increased administratively allowing fees to increase based on the Consumer Price
Index. The administrative fee increase applied for a three year period (2014, 2015 and,
2016). The average increase in fees over this three year time period was approximately
2%.
On November 1, 2016 General Committee adopted Report No. PL16-093 and directed
that an increase in Planning Application fees (2.1%) be adopted. Council subsequently
approved Bylaw 5922-163 including a schedule of Planning Application fees.
Analysis
This report recommends that Council approve the 2018 Planning and Building
Services Development Planning Fees Schedule A.
The majority of the changes to the Planning Application Fees include an additional 2.1%
increase (rounded) to reflect the impact of inflation on the costs of services. These
charges are recommended to maintain consistency in the delivery of services on a cost
recovery basis. Additional minor increases in fees have been included which represent
verifiable development application timeline and review costs. These include; a fee for
Zoning Bylaw Amendment Proposals, Cash-in-lieu of parking applications, Section 37
(Bonusing) Agreements, fees for planning application processes not currently covered
are now included. An additional 7.9 increase (total 10% increase) is proposed for base
fees (not processing or surcharge fees) for Official Plan, Zoning, Plans of Subdivision
and Condominium applications. An increase in the annual File Maintenance fee to $700
is also proposed.
Advisory Committee Review
Not applicable.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R4
Page 2 of 6
November 21, 2017 Page 3 of 4 Report No. PBS17-084
Financial Implications
Section 69 of the Planning Act allows municipalities to charge fees for the processing of
applications in respect to planning matters. These fees are applied to development
applications to offset the charges to reviewing processing planning applications to meet
Council budget projections. Such fees are charged through the approval of a Council
approved Bylaw.
Communications Considerations
Notification of the increase in Planning Application Fees (Schedule A) is provided to the
Building and Development industry on an annual basis, will be provided on all
development planning application forms and will be posted on the Town’s web site.
Link to Strategic Plan
Reviewing and updating the Town’s Fees and Services Bylaw annually contributes to
achieving the Strategic Plan guiding principle of ‘Leadership in Corporate Management’
and improves transparency and accountability to the community.
Alternative(s) to the Recommendation
1. Council may direct that the Planning Application Fees remain at their 2017 rate.
2. Council may direct that changes be made to the recommended Planning
Application Fees Schedule A.
Conclusions
Section 69 of the Planning Act allows municipalities to charge fees for the processing of
applications in respect to planning matters. The Planning Application Fees have been
primarily updated to reflect the 2016-2017 year to year inflationary increase of 2.1%.
Fees for planning application processes not currently covered are now included. An
additional 7.9 increase (total 10% increase) is proposed for base fees (not processing or
surcharge fees) for Official Plan, Zoning and Plans of Subdivision applications. An
increase in File Maintenance fee to $705 is also proposed.
Attachments
1. Proposed Schedule A, 2017 Planning Application Fees.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R4
Page 3 of 6
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R4 Page 4 of 6
By-lawXXXX, to amend By-law 5922-16
Planning Application Fees 2018 1
SCHEDULE “A” TO BY-LAW
PLANNING APPLICATION TYPE 2018 BASE
FEE
2018 PROCESSING
FEES/SURCHARGE
2018 ADDITIONAL FEES
OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENTS
MAJOR (see Note 1)
MINOR (see Note 2)
$ 20,652
$ 11,720
PLUS: $5,222
prior to adoption of OPA
$2,251 Revision Fee (Major)
$1,725 Revision Fee (Minor)
BLOCK PLANS $ 10,572 PLUS:
$552 per hectare or part thereof
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENTS
MAJOR (see Note 3)
MINOR (see Note 4)
REMOVAL OF HOLD
ZONING PROPOSAL (see Note 8)
TEMPORARY USE
$ 12,375
$6,700
$4,237
$ 550
$6,203
PLUS:
$5,222 prior to enactment of ZBA
$6,203 per extension
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION $ 15,310 PLUS:
$628/unit; and,
$8,260 per hectare or part thereof for
all other lands (see Note 5)
$2,251 Extension of Draft
Approval
$1,792 Revision Fee (where
applicant makes revisions to plans
requiring recirculation)
$4,298 Revisions to a Draft
Approved Plan of Subdivision, or
conditions of Draft Approval
$4,210 Registration of Each
Phase
PART LOT CONTROL $2,425
DRAFT PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM
(ALL TYPES)
$ 19,908 $2,251 Extension of Draft
Approval
$3,522 Revisions to Approved
Draft Plan of Condominium
$4,298 Registration of Each
Phase
SITE PLAN APPROVAL
MINOR AND AMENDING SITE PLANS
(see Note 6)
(per m2 fee applicable only if there is an
increase in g.f.a.)
REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN
EXEMPTION
$6,264
$3,364
$ 602
PLUS:
$628 /unit for Residential
$322 /unit for Multi-Res.(apts.)
ICI buildings for first 2,000m2 :
$3.29/m2 of g.f.a.
ICI buildings portion of g.f.a. between
2,001m2 - 10,000m2 : $2.14/m2 of
g.f.a
ICI buildings portion of g.f.a. beyond
10,000m2 : $1.07/m2 of g.f.a
PLUS:
ICI buildings for first 2,000m2 :
$3.29/m2 of g.f.a.
ICI buildings portion of g.f.a. between
2,001m2 - 10,000m2 : $2.14/m2 of
g.f.a.
ICI buildings portion of g.f.a. beyond
10,000m2 : $1.07/m2 of g.f.a
$1,200 Recirculation/Revisions
Fee (where the applicant fails to
revise drawings as requested by
the Town beyond the third
submission or the Applicant
changes the plans/proposal).
$250 for Requests for Site Plan
Exemption beyond the 2nd
Submission
RADIOCOMMUNICATION
TOWER/ANTENNA FACILITIES FEE
$8,148
GENERAL FEES
OWNER’S REQUEST TO CANCEL
PUBLIC PLANNING MEETING
ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD
REFERRAL FEE (for all Development
Applications)
FILE MAINTENANCE FEE
CASH-IN-LIEU OF PARKING
AGREEMENT
SECTION 37 (BONUSING)AGREEMENT
$3,400
$ 592
$ 700/year
$5,000
$5,000
Attachment 1
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R4
Page 5 of 6
By-lawXXXX, to amend By-law 5922-16
Planning Application Fees 2018 2
Notes:
1) Major Official Plan Amendment: An Application that is significant in scale and scope which may have greater impact or policy
implication beyond the subject lands. Such Applications may include those relating to multiple properties; site specific
proposals that represent large scale development/significant change in use; and, Applications involving significant changes
to the text/policies of the Official Plan.
2) Minor Official Plan Amendment: An Application that is a small scale amendment to the Official Plan policies and
designations, having limited impact or policy implications beyond the subject lands.
3) Major Zoning By-law Amendment: An Application that is significant in scale and scope which may have an impact beyond
the subject lands. Such Applications may include:
• an Application relating to more than one property;
• a Site Specific Application, if considered to represent large scale redevelopment;
• significant change in use and/or zone category; or
• an Application involving significant changes to the development standards or general
provisions of the by-law.
4) Minor Zoning By-law Amendment: An Application for minor and small scale Zoning Amendment having no significant impact
on adjoining lands. Minor Application must be site specific and include:
• a request for additional permitted use, within an existing building or with no significant impact
on existing development standards; and
• changes in development standards to accommodate a minor development or severance.
5) All other lands within the draft plan excluding roads, road widenings and environmental protection lands.
6) Minor and Amending Site Plans shall include amendments to existing Site Plan Agreements for those properties with
Development Agreements executed and registered after 2000. Staff shall determine, in consultation with other departments,
if a Site Plan Application is considered minor, an amendment, or if a new Site Plan Application is required.
7) Required due to an Owner’s or Applicant’s revisions or deferrals.
8) Per Section 34 (10.0.0.2) of the Planning Act, Council Resolution required to accept Zoning Bylaw Amendment Applications
prior to June 27, 2019.
Payment of Fees
All fees set out herein shall be payable to the Town of Aurora upon the submission of the related application to the Town, unless
otherwise provided herein. The fee amount shall be completed by the Applicant on the Fee Calculation Worksheet included with
each Application Form.
50% of Fees will be refunded if an Application is withdrawn prior to any Council or Committee of Adjustment consideration.
PLANNING APPLICATION TYPE
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
2018 BASE
FEE
2018 PROCESSING
FEES/SURCHARGE
2018 ADDITIONAL FEES
CONSENT
CHANGE OF CONDITIONS
(Only before a final Consent is granted)
RECIRCULATION FEE
(see Note 7)
$3,395
$ 898
$2,553
PLUS:
$1,705 per new lot created
MINOR VARIANCE OR PERMISSION
OAK RIDGES MORAINE RESIDENTIAL
GROUND-RELATED RESIDENTIAL
ZONED LANDS
MORE THAN ONE VARIANCE
RELATED TO A DRAFT APPROVED
PLAN OF SUBDIVISION
ALL OTHER USES, INCLUDING ICI
RECIRCULATION FEE
(see Note 7)
ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD
REFERRAL FEE (for both Consent and
Variance Applications)
$1,628
$1,949
$1,949
$2,389
$1,353
$ 306
$1,021 per lot/unit
MUNICIPAL STREET NAME CHANGE
MUNICIPAL ADDRESSING CHANGE
$1,608
$1,046
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R4
Page 6 of 6
Town of Aurora
General Committee Report No. IES17-036
Subject: Metrolinx Railway Overpass Multipurpose Tunnel
Prepared by: Marco Ramunno, Director, Planning and Building Services
Jim Tree Acting, Manager of Operations
Department: Infrastructure and Environmental Services
Date: November 21, 2017
Recommendation
1.That Report No. IES17-036 be received; and
2.That Council request the Regional Municipality of York and Metrolinx to
maintain the existing 1.5 meter sidewalk in all future design plans associated
with the BRCE and the future Rapid Transit/Viva Regional Road Expansion
projects; and
3.That any future relocation of the existing pedestrian walkway be designed to
Town of Aurora standards and funded entirely by the Region of York.
Executive Summary
Staff are seeking to advise Council on the works proposed by both Metrolinx and the
Regional Municipality of York (the Region) associated with the rail overpass crossing of
Yonge Street south of Henderson Drive and the future widening of Yonge Street to six
lanes in this vicinity as follows:
•The Region has requested the Town of Aurora respond regarding funding a
Multi-Use Pathway Tunnel under the rail overpass
•The Region and Metrolinx propose no funding of the costs associated with
construction of the tunnel
•Multi-Use Pathway not identified in Trails Masterplan in this location
Background
The Region Transportation and Infrastructure Planning section is leading the process
for local municipalities in the BRCE Project where the Metrolinx rail line interfaces with
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R5
Page 1 of 14
November 21, 2017 Page 2 of 5 Report No. IES17-036
the Region’s road network. As part of the BRCE, Metrolinx will be expanding the
existing Yonge Street rail overpass involving construction of a new railway bridge
immediately adjacent to the existing bridge. In addition, the Region is coordinating with
Metrolinx the conceptual design of their Rapid Transit/Viva Regional Road Expansion to
be implemented at some future date.
As part of the BRCE project Metrolinx was requested by the Region to prepare a
conceptual design plan and cost estimate for a preferred Multi-Use Pedestrian and
Cycling off road pathway and tunnel under the proposed rail crossings.
The Region announced there is no Regional or Provincial funding available for the
construction of this tunnel and, unless the Town wishes to pay for the tunnel
construction costs, a 1.5 metre sidewalk will be included in the design as a minimum
standard.
Analysis
Regional Municipality of York, on behalf of Metrolinx, is requesting the Town’s
position on a Multi-Use Pathway (MUP)and Tunnel under the Yonge Street rail
lines
The Region has been coordinating the conceptual design work with Metrolinx for the rail
bridge expansion project as well as the future Viva transit bus route widening. This
work has now been completed and project cost estimates have been prepared.
The Region indicated to the Metrolinx Rail Corridor expansion consultants, in an earlier
Environmental Assessment associated with the Viva Rapid Transit project, that the
preferred method of pedestrian and cycling travel in this location was to construct a
separate tunnel behind the east side bridge abutments. Currently there is an existing
pedestrian sidewalk in this location which provides safe passage beneath the rail
overpass and the back travel part of the road.
With the future widening of Yonge Street to facilitate the Viva Rapid Transit project,
Yonge Street will be widened to six lanes in this location and, as such, will impact the
existing sidewalk. Both Metrolinx and the Region confirm that a 1.5 metre sidewalk can
be accommodated in the event that the MUP is not approved. Staff requested that the
Region provide further information and plans specifically showing how the sidewalk can
be accommodated and located within the road allowance.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R5
Page 2 of 14
November 21, 2017 Page 3 of 5 Report No. IES17-036
Metrolinx is now in the process of finalizing the design for the new additional rail
overpass and requires a decision on the MUP tunnel in order to determine whether or
not it will be included in the rail construction project.
Metrolinx consultants, in their background studies and reports, indicated that the MUP
tunnel can be accommodated in the future; however, they also indicate that the capital
construction costs will significantly increase based on complications with the active rail
line and several other operational issues.
The Region does not currently propose contributing funding toward the MUP
tunnel
The Region identified a MUP tunnel as the preferred solution in facilitating pedestrians
and cyclists beneath the existing and proposed rail corridor with an estimated value of
$2,500,000 and requested Metrolinx provide a design as part of the rail overpass design
assignment; however, the Region’s original intent is not clear in terms of their positon on
funding the tunnel construction.
On June 15, 2017, the Region notified Town staff that they are not in a position to fund
this project due to funding constraints and suggested that the Town apply for funding
assistance through the Region’s Pedestrian and Cycling Municipal Partnership
Program. Staff concur with the Region that the MUP tunnel is considered the preferred
means to move pedestrians and cyclists in this particular location; however, the capital
costs associated with this tunnel are prohibitive as the Town would be required to fully
fund this project.
Trails Master Plan does not identify a Multi-Use Pathway or grade separated
crossing in this location
The Trails Master Plan identifies future trails south, west and east of the railway corridor
and does not identify a trail north of Industrial Parkway on Yonge Street and, as such,
staff cannot recommend that the construction of the MUP tunnel.
The Town’s Engineering Division requires the existing pedestrian sidewalk on the east
side of Yonge Street be maintained in its current configuration and remain open for
public access.
In the event that the future road widening associated with Viva Rapid Transit Project
should proceed, The Town’s Engineering staff will be involved to ensure that a sidewalk
that meets all applicable design standards is included in the project.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R5
Page 3 of 14
November 21, 2017 Page 4 of 5 Report No. IES17-036
Advisory Committee Review
This item was not envisioned or included in the Trails Master Plan and as such staff did
not circulate this report through the Trails Advisory Committee.
Financial Implications
There are no financial implications associated with the recommendations contained in
this report.
Communications Considerations
There is no external communication required.
Link to Strategic Plan
Maintaining the Town’s facilities supports the Strategic Plan Goal of Investing in
Sustainable Infrastructure by maintaining infrastructure to support forecasted population
growth through technology, waste management, roads, emergency services and
accessibility.
Alternative(s) to the Recommendation
1. Council could elect to fund the MUP tunnel and revise the Trails Master Plan to
reflect this addition; however, this project is estimated to cost in excess of
$2,500,000 and funds for this expenses have not been included in the 10 Year
Capital Forecast or the current Development Charges By-law.
2. Council could elect to defer the MUP tunnel at this time and refer the matter to the
Trails & Active Transportation Advisory Committee to consider its importance and
have the Committee explore alternative funding sources that may be leveraged for
implementation of the MUP tunnel at some point in the future.
Conclusions
Staff recommend that Council not pursue the MUP tunnel project due to the high capital
costs and the lack of Regional funding for the project. Staff also conclude that, provided
the Region maintains a pedestrian sidewalk that meets all applicable Municipal
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R5
Page 4 of 14
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R5 Page 5 of 14
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R5 Page 6 of 14
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R5 Page 7 of 14
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R5 Page 8 of 14
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R5 Page 9 of 14
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R5 Page 10 of 14
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R5 Page 11 of 14
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R5 Page 12 of 14
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R5 Page 13 of 14
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R5 Page 14 of 14
Town of Aurora
General Committee Report No. IES17-039
Subject: Request for Approval of Capital Project No. 72272 – SARC
Program Room Refresh
Prepared by: Chris Catania, Accessibility/Project Advisor
Department: Infrastructure and Environmental Services
Date: November 21, 2017
Recommendation
1. That Report No. IES17-039 be received; and
2. That Report No. IES17-039 satisfy Council’s conditional budget approval for
Capital Project No. 72272 – SARC Program Room Refresh in the amount of
$20,000, excluding taxes; and
3. That staff be authorized to proceed with Capital Project No. 72272 – SARC
Program Room Refresh.
Executive Summary
To satisfy Council’s request for detailed report on Capital Project No. 72272 and seek
final budget approval:
• A Corporate Refresh Strategy was developed in 2014 to allow orderly
replacement and updating of aged furniture and building finishes.
• Refreshing the rooms to a Corporate standard.
Background
During the 2017 Capital Budget process, Council approved Capital Budget No. 72272 –
SARC Program Room Refresh project pending a further report and this report provides
the additional information requested through the Capital Projects approval process.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R6
Page 1 of 4
November 21, 2017 Page 2 of 4 Report No. IES17-039
Analysis
A Corporate Refresh Strategy was developed in 2014 to allow orderly replacement
and updating of aged furniture and building finishes.
The refresh approach is manageable based on annual incremental investments in
furniture, painting and carpeting/tile. This process includes recommendations on
standardization of workstations/workspace, program areas, and approval of a
colour/finish scheme to ensure uniform, consistent and coordinated decoration of the
interior spaces.
The architectural firm of HOK Inc. was retained to make recommendations on a holistic
approach to refresh the carpet, paint and office/program furniture and usher in a more
modern décor.
The SARC was opened in 2006 and the Program Room includes all original furniture,
carpet and paint. These features are showing signs of age and will require updating in
order to maintain facility standards and revenue generated through permitted use.
In an area that sees high traffic, the SARC Program Room will replace carpet with Vinyl
plank (wood-look) flooring. Painting with the inclusion of “Acoustic Panels” will help
eliminate noise interference. Finally, program tables and chairs will be replaced with a
more modern standard. The refresh of the SARC Program room takes into account
colours/finishes/furniture that are flexible and best suited for this permitted use.
Refreshing rooms to a corporate standard
A corporate standard exists for carpet, paint and furniture. In the office environment,
furniture includes workstations, meeting tables, chairs and filing cabinets. This standard
has been implemented in the design and build of the Joint Operations Centre as well as
the annual improvements to the Town Hall refresh, i.e. Human Resources.
Currently, a standard does not exist for recreational facility program space. Each
recreational facility is unique and a refresh will be flexible in design that is best suited for
permitted use.
Advisory Committee Review
Not applicable.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R6
Page 2 of 4
November 21, 2017 Page 3 of 4 Report No. IES17-039
Financial Implications
Project #72272 is included in the 2017 Capital Budget at a cost of $20,000 provided the
information contained within the report meets the needs of Council.
Communications Considerations
Impact to staff and permitted groups will be communicated in advance through Inside
Aurora, email, website and social media. Notice of Service of Disruptions will be posted
detailing anticipated duration of work and alternative arrangements for limiting any
disruption.
Link to Strategic Plan
The approval of the SARC Refresh Program Room, Capital Project No. 72272 supports
the Strategic Plan goal of Supporting an Exceptional Quality of Life for All through
its accomplishment in satisfying requirements in the following key objectives within this
goal statement:
Invest in sustainable infrastructure: through the enhancement of a modern,
accessible recreation program room promotes the adaptability and flexibility of
services to respond to demographic shifts and through establishing policies and
programs that enhance the accessibility and safety of new and existing facilities
and infrastructure that these action items are realized.
Alternative(s) to the Recommendation
1. Council may choose not to proceed with the SARC Refresh Program Room.
Conclusions
This report seeks the approval of capital Project No. 72272 based on the current status
of “Approved Pending a Further Report”.
The information provided in this report is intended to respond to the needs of council
identified during the 2017 capital project approval process.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R6
Page 3 of 4
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R6 Page 4 of 4
Town of Aurora
General Committee Report No. IES17-040
Subject: Purchase Order Increase for Pool liner Repairs for the SARC
Facility
Prepared by: Philip Galin, Manager, Facilities, Property & Fleet
Department: Infrastructure and Environmental Services
Date: November 21, 2017
Recommendation
1. That Report No. IES17-040 be received; and
2. That, in accordance with the Procurement By-law, Purchase Order No. 1149 be
increased by $21,480, excluding taxes, to a total of $113,672, excluding taxes,
for pool repairs at the Stronach Aurora Recreation Complex (SARC) in favour
of Nationwide Commercial Aquatics Inc.
Executive Summary
The purpose of this report is to outline the need to increase PO No. 1149 for the
emergency replacement of the floor membrane in the SARC shallow end lap pool while
the Vendor, Nationwide Commercial Aquatics Inc. was completing scheduled repairs.
The original contract was signed for $ 91,118, excluding taxes, and during the repair
process, unforeseen deficiencies required immediate attention while the pools were
drained and shut down.
This report seeks Council approval to increase the purchase order by $21,480,
excluding taxes, for Nationwide Commercial Aquatics Inc.
Background
A contract was signed and the Vendor agreed that all work would commence on
September 5, 2017 and would be completed no later than September 29, 2017. The
Contractor completed all the repairs and services contemplated under the agreed work
plan and scope of work and the timeline. The pools at the SARC had to be in a fully
functional condition on September 30, 2017.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R7
Page 1 of 4
November 21, 2017 Page 2 of 4 Report No. IES17-040
During the repair process, the contractor noticed a problem in the shallow end of the lap
pool; the pool liner had water trapped under the membrane. With the current scope of
work to remove the old lane markings and replace these areas, the labour needed to
repair the new deficiencies would have been the same. A decision was made to
replace the shallow end of the pool liner. If nothing was done, we would need to
replace the liner in a few years and it would then be at an additional cost as well as a
disruption of service. The contractor had the material in stock and the pool opened on
time without any loss of programming to the community.
Analysis
During preventative maintenance in 2016, deficiencies were noted and funding for
repairs was assisted by the 1/3 funding of the Canada 150 grant
The pool at the SARC is a Myrtha pool and every year we drain and inspect the pool
and work on preventative maintenance to reduce unscheduled shut downs and
disruptions to programs. Last year during the shutdown, we noticed issues that we
planned for this year’s repairs. Once the pool was drained we corrected all deficiencies
from the previous operational year. The original Scope of Repairs included:
• remove existing floor lane markings;
• install new lane membrane;
• paint new black lane markings with Myrtha PVC paint;
• repair existing wall targets;
• paint black with Myrtha PVC paint;
• re-stretch floor membrane to remove wrinkles in pool floor;
• replace existing lane rope anchors with newest model in Lap Pool;
• replace gutter grating on Lap and Leisure pools, including custom cuts to match
pool profile; and
• replace broken/chipped hand grip tile on Lap Pool.
Advisory Committee Review
Not applicable.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R7
Page 2 of 4
November 21, 2017 Page 3 of 4 Report No. IES17-040
Financial Implications
Capital Project No. 72221 for $425,000 that is part of the Canada 150 Grant submission
and includes other projects. With the additional work, the project remains on budget.
Communications Considerations
There is no external communication required.
Link to Strategic Plan
Maintaining the Town’s facilities supports the Strategic Plan goal of Investing in
Sustainable Infrastructure by maintaining infrastructure to support forecasted
population growth through technology, waste management, roads, emergency services
and accessibility.
Alternative(s) to the Recommendation
1. None. This work has been completed; however, as per the Procurement By-law,
staff must seek approval for all contracts in excess of $100,000.
Conclusions
In consultation with Recreation Division staff, all the SARC pool projects were
completed during the scheduled preventative maintenance period and the contractor
has worked around facility scheduling, with minimal impact to operations.
It is recommended that PO No. 1149 be increased by $ 21,480 for a revised value of
$113,672, excluding taxes.
Attachments
None.
Previous Reports
None.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R7
Page 3 of 4
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R7 Page 4 of 4
Town of Aurora
General Committee Report No. PBS17-043
Subject: Inflow & Infiltration Reduction Project
Prepared by: Michael Logue, Program Manager, Economic Planning
Department: Planning and Building Services
Date: November 21, 2017
Recommendations
1.That Report No. PBS17-043 be received; and,
2.That the Mayor and Town Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement with a
new landowners group and the Regional Municipality of York, for an Inflow &
Infiltration Reduction Project based on the principles outlined in this report, to
the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building Services and the Town
Solicitor.
Executive Summary
•This report seeks Council’s direction to formally request York Region to enter into a tri-
party agreement with Aurora and a land owners group that will undertake inflow &
infiltration (I/I) reduction.
•This agreement to build on the successful 2012 I/I pilot project that was completed by
the 2C Planning Area Developers Group.
•New land owners group in Aurora is prepared to undertake further I/I work (wastewater
system improvements in exchange for sanitary servicing capacity), which will save the
Town servicing allocation.
•New tri-party agreement will be required with York Region, as the Region controls
servicing allocation and will be providing credits upon verifying completion of work.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R8
Page 1 of 4
November 21, 2017 Page 2 of 4 Report No. PBS17-043
Background
History of Inflow & Infiltration (I/I) Projects in Aurora
Council previously endorsed a 2C Inflow and Infiltration pilot project with the 2C land
owners group in June, 2011.
The purpose of the project was to recapture servicing allocation through I/I, that could
apply towards future development areas in the Town of Aurora.
This was done under the context of the Town having a limited supply of servicing
allocation capacity, until the Upper York Servicing Solution (UYSS) is in place - which
remains the case today.
I/I work undertaken at that time focused on reducing wastewater flows (leakage) on public
and private properties in older areas of Aurora. System improvements gained were
credited back to the 2C land owners at a rate of 2-for-1 (as determined by the Region).
A tri-party agreement between the 2C land owners, the Town of Aurora, and the Regional
Municipality of York was required.
Analysis
Work as part of prior I/I project is complete, time to close the project
I/I work done on behalf of the 2C land owners has been completed, their developments
received sufficient servicing allocation to proceed, and development in the 2C Planning
Area is well underway, ahead of projections.
The 2C landowners have made a formal request to close the Town’s initial I/I pilot project.
Staff consider the initial I/I project a success, as improvements to wastewater systems
were made at no cost to the Town of Aurora. The Town was also able to preserve supply
of servicing allocation that would have otherwise been given to developments in 2C, for
future applications.
New I/I project proposed, work to be undertaken on behalf of new landowners group
A new landowners group, representing significant future residential land holdings and
coordinated by the same lead developer as in 2C (TACC Group), are proposing to
undertake a new I/I project, to offset the servicing allocation capacity that would be
required by their future development applications.
Further I/I opportunities remain from the initial 2C pilot project, and the land owners group
will be completing a detailed analysis to determine specific opportunities for I/I reduction.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R8
Page 2 of 4
November 21, 2017 Page 3 of 4 Report No. PBS17-043
Examples of prior work completed for I/I credits include sealing manhole covers and
disconnecting downspouts from discharging into the sanitary sewer system. This work will
be reviewed and approved by Town and Regional staff.
Goal of prolonging Town’s servicing allocation capacity
The goal is that this second I/I project will help to prolong the Town of Aurora’s servicing
allocation balances until such time that the infrastructure to support growth is in place (i.e.
UYSS). Staff are also exploring opportunities to extend servicing allocation in partnership
with York Region, and will report on progress when appropriate.
New tri-party Agreement with York Region required
A tri-party agreement will once again be required, between the Town, Region, and land
owners. This report will serve as notice to York Region that the Town and land owner
intend to enter into another I/I agreement with the Region.
Advisory Committee Review
N/A.
Financial Implications
There are no financial implications.
Communications Considerations
No Communication Required.
Link to Strategic Plan
The Inflow & Infiltration Reduction Project supports the Strategic Plan objective of
Investing in Sustainable Infrastructure, specifically through the action item of Developing
policies to ensure that growth is phased and coordinated with existing and planned
infrastructure.
Alternatives to the Recommendation
Council can decide not to proceed with the second proposed Inflow and Infiltration
Reduction project.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R8
Page 3 of 4
November 21, 2017 Page 4 of 4 Report No. PBS 17-043
Conclusions
The 2C 1/1 project will be successfully wrapping up, and it is time to enter into a new tri
party agreement with the Town, York Region, and land owners in Aurora prepared to
undertake further wastewater system improvements, in exchange for extra servicing
allocation credits, provided by the Region via the Town. This will help extend the life of the
Town's servicing allocation balances, until such time that a servicing allocation solution
involving the Region, such as the Upper York Servicing Solution, is available.
Attachments
None.
Previous Reports
Report No. IES-026, dated June 14, 2011
Pre-submission Review
Agenda Management Team Meeting review on November 1, 2017
Departmental Approval
Marco Ramunno, MCIP, RPP
Director
Planning and Building Services
Approved for Agenda
Doug Nadorozny
Chief Administrative Officer
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R8
Page 4 of 4
Town of Aurora
General Committee Report No. PBS17-085
Subject: Proposal for Zoning By-law Amendment Application
Prepared by: Glen Letman, Manager of Development Planning
Department: Planning and Building Services
Date: November 21, 2017
____________________________________________________________
Recommendation
1. That Report No. PBS17-085 be received, and;
2. Staff recommend that Council accept the Zoning By-law Amendment
Applications related to the following Zoning By-law Proposals:
a) 2501500 Ontario Inc. (16003 Yonge Street), File No. ZP-2017-09
b) 2540280 Ontario Inc. (255 Old Yonge Street), File No. ZP-2017-10
c) Shen & He (15385-15395 Bayview Avenue), File No. ZP-2017-11
Executive Summary
On June 27, 2017 Council passed Comprehensive Zoning By-law 6000-17 and
pursuant to Section 34 (10.0.0.2) of the Planning Act passed a Resolution to only
accept certain classes of Zoning By-law Amendment Applications. The purpose of this
report is to provide Council with an owner’s request of a Zoning By-law Amendment
proposal. A Council resolution is required to receive, or not receive, the Zoning By-law
Amendment Applications.
The Owner’s description of their proposal and accompanying plans are attached for
Council information and consideration.
Proposals (3):
a) 2501500 Ontario Inc. (16003 Yonge Street), File No. ZP-2017-09
The owner proposes to redevelop the property with an L-shaped 10-storey (37
metres) to 11-storey (40.7 metres) residential apartment building with a total of
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R9
Page 1 of 20
November 21, 2017 Page 2 of 6 Report No. PBS17-085
119 units and 187 parking spaces. The owner also proposes to relocate the “Red
House”) currently located on the subject lands.
b) 2540280 Ontario Inc. (255 Old Yonge Street), File No. ZP-2017-10
The Owner proposes to sever the property into three lots, to construct two 3-
storey single detached residential dwellings and one 2-storey single detached
residential dwelling. The owner also proposes to relocate the “Red House”
currently located at 16003 Yonge Street to the northeast corner of 255 Old
Yonge Street, and incorporate it into the single detached dwelling at one of the
newly created lots at the northeast corner of the site.
c) Shen & He (15385-15395 Bayview Avenue), File No. ZP-2017-11
The owner proposes to redevelop the subject lands to construct a condominium
development comprising of fifteen (15) townhouse units with a total of 40 parking
spaces.
Background
On June 27, 2017 Council enacted Comprehensive Zoning By-law 6000-17.
As reported in staff report PBS17-056 the provisions of Bill 73, incorporated into the
Planning Act provides that once a Comprehensive Zoning By-law is approved by
Council by simultaneously repealing and replacing all zoning By-laws in effect no new
site-specific zoning by-law amendments (Section 34) and no new minor variance
applications (Section 45) can be submitted to the Town for a period of two (2) years,
unless Council passes a resolution permitting a specific application, a class of
application or in respect of such applications generally.
With respect to this on June 27, 2017 Council passed the following resolution:
“That Report No. PBS17-056 be received; and
That, pursuant to Section 45 (1.4) of the Planning Act, Council declares that
Committee of Adjustment minor variance applications be permitted; and
That, pursuant to Section 34 (10.0.0.2) of the Planning Act, Council declares that
Industrial/Employment, Commercial and Institutional (ICI) By-law amendment
applications be permitted.”
The subject proposals do not fall within either of the classes in which Council has
passed a resolution. As such, in order for an applicant to submit a complete application
to the Town for a Section 34, Zoning By-law Amendment, Council shall, by resolution
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R9
Page 2 of 20
November 21, 2017 Page 3 of 6 Report No. PBS17-085
direct that the application can be received and processed. If accepted all applicable
processing provisions of the Planning Act would apply to the application.
The three proposals under consideration are accompanied with a brief summary and
plans which are attached to this report for Council information. The applicants have
requested Delegation status to outline their proposal. A description of the proposals is
as follows:
a) 2501500 Ontario Inc. (16003 Yonge Street), File No. ZP-2017-09
The owner proposes to redevelop the property with an L-shaped 10 storey (37
metres) to 11-storey (40.7 metres) residential apartment building with a total of
119 units and 187 parking spaces. The owner also proposes to relocate the
Ontario Heritage Act (OHA) Part IV Designated heritage house (the “Red
House”) to the northeast corner of the adjacent property at 255 Old Yonge Street.
The subject lands are currently designated “Commercial Special” by Site Specific
Policy 11 in the Official Plan. The proposal will require an Official Plan
Amendment application, which will be submitted. The subject lands are currently
zoned “Community Commercial C4(295) Exception Zone” and “Environmental
Protection (EP) Zone” by By-law 6000-17. A Zoning By-law Amendment
application will also be required to permit the development.
The rationale to accept the Zoning By-law Amendment application is that staff
had preconsultations with the applicant in July 2015 and April 2017,prior to the
approval of the Town’s Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw. It is noted that an Official
Plan Amendment application will also be filed on the lands to permit an
apartment building within the Stable Residential designation.
b) 2540280 Ontario Inc. (255 Old Yonge Street), File No. ZP-2017-10
The Owner proposes to sever the western portion of the property and consolidate
it with the lands at 16003 Yonge Street and to sever the remaining portion of the
property into three lots, to construct two 3-storey single detached residential
dwellings and one 2-storey residential detached dwelling. The OHA Part IV
Designated heritage house (the “Red House”) is proposed to be relocated from
16003 Yonge Street, and incorporated into the single detached dwelling at one of
the newly created lots at the northeast corner of the subject site.
The subject lands are currently zoned “Rural (RU) Zone” and “Environmental
Protection (EP) Zone” by By-law 6000-17. A Zoning By-law Amendment
application is required to permit the development.
The rationale to accept the receipt of the Zoning By-law Amendment application
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R9
Page 3 of 20
November 21, 2017 Page 4 of 6 Report No. PBS17-085
is that the proposal is an infill residential development within the “Stable
Residential” designation of the Official Plan and a preliminary review of the
proposal reveals that the use conforms to the Official Plan. Staff had a pre-
consultation meeting with the owners in April 2017, prior to Council approval of
Bylaw 6000-17. Upon submission of the complete Zoning Bylaw Amendment
application staff will undertake a review of built form and compatibility of the
proposed development to determine conformity to the policies of the Official Plan.
c) Shen & He (15385-15395 Bayview Avenue), File No. ZP-2017-11
The owner proposes to redevelop the subject lands to construct a condominium
development comprising of fifteen (15) townhouse units with a total of 32 parking
spaces and 8 visitor parking spaces.
The subject lands are currently zoned “Rural (RU) Zone” by By-law 6000-17. A
Zoning By-law Amendment application is required to permit the development.
The rationale to accept the receipt of the Zoning By-law Amendment application
is that the proposal is an infill residential development within the “Medium-High
Density Residential” designation within the Bayview Northeast Area 2B
Secondary Plan (OPA 30) and a preliminary review of the proposal reveals that
the use conforms to the Official Plan. Staff preconsulted with the owner on the
proposal in August 2015. Upon submission of the complete Zoning Bylaw
Amendment application staff will undertake a review of built form and
compatibility of the proposed development to determine conformity to the policies
of the Secondary Plan.
Advisory Committee Review
Not applicable.
Financial Implications
None.
Communications Considerations
Not applicable.
Link to Strategic Plan
Not applicable.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R9
Page 4 of 20
November 21, 2017 Page 5 of 6 Report No. PBS17-085
Alternative to the Recommendation
That Council not accept receipt of the Zoning By-law Amendment application.
Conclusions
A Council resolution is required to accept, or not accept the subject application. Staff
recommend that Council accept the Zoning By-law Amendment Applications related to
the following Zoning By-law Proposals:
a) 2501500 Ontario Inc. (16003 Yonge Street), File No. ZP-2017-09
b) 2540280 Ontario Inc. (255 Old Yonge Street), File No. ZP-2017-10
c) Shen & He (15385-15395 Bayview Avenue), ZP-2017-11
Attachments
1. 2501500 Ontario Inc. (16003 Yonge Street) Proposal Letter dated October 12, 2017
Figure 1: Location Map
Figure 2: Conceptual Site Plan
Figure 3: Conceptual Building Elevation
2. 2540280 Ontario Inc. (255 Old Yonge Street) Proposal Letter dated October 12, 2017
Figure 1: Location Map
Figure 2: Conceptual Site Plan
Figure 3: Conceptual Building Elevation
3. Shen & He (15385-15395 Bayview Avenue), Proposal Letter dated October 14, 2017
Figure 1: Location Map
Figure 2: Conceptual Site Plan
Figure 3: Proposed Building Elevation
Previous Reports
None.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R9
Page 5 of 20
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R9 Page 6 of 20
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R9 Page 7 of 20
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R9 Page 8 of 20
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R9 Page 9 of 20
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R9 Page 10 of 20
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R9 Page 11 of 20
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R9 Page 12 of 20
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R9 Page 13 of 20
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R9 Page 14 of 20
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R9 Page 15 of 20
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R9 Page 16 of 20
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R9 Page 17 of 20
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R9 Page 18 of 20
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R9 Page 19 of 20
General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R9 Page 20 of 20
NOTICE OF MOTION Councillor Tom Mrakas
Date: November 21, 2017
To: Mayor and Members of Council
From: Councillor Mrakas
Re: Interim Control By-Law – Stable Neighbourhoods
Whereas the Town has experienced a significant amount of pressure for infill residential
development that has resulted in intensification through the construction of additions,
conversion of existing floor area and the demolition of existing buildings for the
construction of larger, more intense forms of development; and
Whereas staff are conducting a study of the Town's existing zoning policies and
regulations regarding infill housing and intensification in stable neighbourhoods; and
Whereas protecting the integrity of “Stable Neighbourhoods” is of the upmost
importance to our residents; and
Whereas Section 38 of the Planning Act allows municipalities to pass an Interim Control
By-Law (ICBL), to be in effect for a period not exceeding one year, prohibiting the use of
land, buildings or structures for specific purposes in a defined area;
1.Now Therefore Be It Hereby Resolved That staff develop an Interim Control By-law
aimed at limiting new development or alterations for a one-year period within
“Stable Neighbourhoods” as identified and defined in the Official Plan; and
2.Be It Further Resolved That staff report back to General Committee in the
December cycle with a draft Interim Control By-law for Council’s consideration and
enactment.
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Notice of Motion (a)
Page 1 of 1
Public Release
November 17, 2017
Town of Aurora
Additional Items to
General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
7 p.m., Council Chambers
• Revised General Committee Meeting Agenda Index
• Delegation (b) Chad B. John-Baptiste, representing 2501500 Ontario Inc.
Re: Item R9 – PBS17-085 – Proposal for Zoning By-law
Amendment (a) 2501500 Ontario Inc. (16003 Yonge Street), File No.
ZP-2017-09, and (b) 2540280 Ontario Inc. (255 Old Yonge Street),
File No. ZP-2017-10
• Item C2 – Memorandum from Mayor Dawe; Re: Lake Simcoe Region
Conservation Authority Board Meeting Highlights of October 27,
2017
• Item R10 – Report No. IES17-037 – Award of Request for Proposal 2017-81-IES
– For Consulting Services to Develop the Town of Aurora’s
Community Energy Plan
(Referred from Council meeting of November 14, 2017)
• Item R11 – Report No. IES17-041 – Additional Information to Report No. IES17-
037 – Award of Request for Proposal 2017-81-IES – For Consulting
Services to Develop the Town of Aurora’s Community Energy Plan
(Referred from Council meeting of November 14, 2017)
• Item R12 – Report No. PRCS17-045 – Award of Tender 2017-117-PRCS
Demolition of Two (2) Buildings Located at 52 and 56 Victoria
Street in Aurora
Public Release
November 17, 2017
Town of Aurora
General Committee
Meeting Agenda (Revised)
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
7 p.m., Council Chambers
Councillor Thompson in the Chair
1. Approval of the Agenda
Recommended:
That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved.
2. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
3. Presentations
(a) Carmela Bourassa, Special Events Coordinator, and Shelley Ware,
Special Events Supervisor
Re: Town of Aurora Platinum Sponsorship Recognition
(b) Julie Stephenson, Youth Programmer, and Shelley Ware, Special Events
Supervisor
Re: Winners of Aurora’s Youth Innovation Fair
4. Delegations
(a) Anita Moore, Chair, Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee
Re: Item R1 – GRAHC17-002 – Council Compensation Review – Final
Report
General Committee Meeting Agenda (Revised)
Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Page 2 of 7
(b) Chad B. John-Baptiste, representing 2501500 Ontario Inc. and 2540280
Ontario Inc.
Re: Item R9 – PBS17-085 – Proposal for Zoning By-law Amendment (a)
2501500 Ontario Inc. (16003 Yonge Street), File No. ZP-2017-09; and
(b) 2540280 Ontario Inc. (255 Old Yonge Street), File No. ZP-2017-10
(Added Item)
5. Consent Agenda
Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine or no longer require
further discussion, and are enacted in one motion. The exception to this rule is that
a Member may request for one or more items to be removed from the Consent
Agenda for separate discussion and action.
Recommended:
That the following Consent Agenda Items, C1 and C2, be approved:
C1. Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes of October 31,
2017
Recommended:
1. That the Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee meeting minutes of
October 31, 2017, be received for information.
C2. Memorandum from Mayor Dawe
Re: Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority Board Meeting
Highlights of October 27, 2017
(Added Item)
Recommended:
1. That the memorandum regarding Lake Simcoe Region Conservation
Authority Board Meeting Highlights of October 27, 2017 be received for
information.
General Committee Meeting Agenda (Revised)
Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Page 3 of 7
6. Consideration of Items Requiring Discussion (Regular Agenda)
R1. GRAHC17-002 – Council Compensation Review – Final Report
Recommended:
1. That Report No. GRAHC17-002 be received; and
2. That no change in compensation for the Mayor be made at this time; and
3. That the compensation of Councillors be increased to $36,000 per year,
fully taxable, commencing with the 2018-2022 term of office; and
4. That Council endorse, in principle, commercially available Long-Term
Disability and Accidental Death and Dismemberment protection plans for
the role of the Mayor only, commencing with the next term of office, and
that staff report back with respect to details for Council’s final
consideration and approval; and
5. That an end of service transition payment program be implemented for
the Mayor only, commencing with the 2018-2022 term of office, as
follows:
(a) Eligible at the completion of one full term, one month of pay for each
completed year of continual service as Mayor to a maximum of six
months’ pay (may be prorated for partial years);
(b) The amount is paid automatically, and paid if the Mayor resigns or
does not return to office for any reason other than as outlined in (c)
below. In the event of the Mayor’s death while in office, the payment
is made to the estate;
(c) No transition payment is paid if the Mayor is removed from office due
to a judicial process and conviction under the Criminal Code, even if
having resigned first; and
6. That no changes be made to transportation allowances, pension, or
health and dental benefit programs currently in place; and
7. That staff bring forward the necessary by-law at a future Council meeting.
General Committee Meeting Agenda (Revised)
Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Page 4 of 7
R2. PRCS17-040 – Highland Gate Parkland Design
Presentation to be provided by Sara Tienkamp, Acting Manager of Parks
Recommended:
1. That Report No. PRCS17-040 be received; and
2. That the Final Parkland Design for the Highland Gate Development
Lands be approved.
R3. CS17-037 – 2018 Procedure By-law Review and Proposed Meeting
Schedule
Recommended:
1. That Report No. CS17-037 be received; and
2. That the final draft Procedure By-law, incorporating Council feedback, be
presented at a future Council meeting for enactment effective as of
January 1, 2018; and
3. That the 2018 Meeting Schedule (Attachment No. 3) be approved.
R4. PBS17-084 – 2018 Planning Applications Fees
Recommended:
1. That Report No. PBS17-084 be received; and
2. That, in accordance with Section 69 of the Planning Act, Council update
the Planning Applications Fees By-law as shown on attached Schedule
A, which increases the 2018 fees for processing of Planning Applications
by 2.1% (generally) to reflect the Consumer Price Index, and modest
verifiable increases to the Official Plan, Zoning By-law, and Subdivision
and Condominium base fees; and
3. That the amending Planning Applications Fees By-law be brought
forward to a future Council meeting for enactment; and
4. That staff be directed to review and amend the Planning Fee schedule on
an annual basis.
General Committee Meeting Agenda (Revised)
Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Page 5 of 7
R5. IES17-036 – Metrolinx Railway Overpass Multipurpose Tunnel
Recommended:
1. That Report No. IES17-036 be received; and
2. That Council request the Regional Municipality of York and Metrolinx to
maintain the existing 1.5 meter sidewalk in all future design plans
associated with the BRCE and the future Rapid Transit/Viva Regional
Road Expansion projects; and
3. That any future relocation of the existing pedestrian walkway be
designed to Town of Aurora standards and funded entirely by the Region
of York.
R6. IES17-039 – Request for Approval of Capital Project No. 72272 –
Stronach Aurora Recreation Complex (SARC) Program
Room Refresh
Recommended:
1. That Report No. IES17-039 be received; and
2. That Report No. IES17-039 satisfy Council’s conditional budget approval
for Capital Project No. 72272 – SARC Program Room Refresh in the
amount of $20,000, excluding taxes; and
3. That staff be authorized to proceed with Capital Project No. 72272 –
SARC Program Room Refresh.
R7. IES17-040 – Purchase Order Increase for Pool Liner Repairs for the
Stronach Aurora Recreation Complex (SARC) Facility
Recommended:
1. That Report No. IES17-040 be received; and
2. That, in accordance with the Procurement By-law, Purchase Order No.
1149 be increased by $21,480, excluding taxes, to a total of $113,672,
excluding taxes, for pool repairs at the Stronach Aurora Recreation
Complex (SARC) in favour of Nationwide Commercial Aquatics Inc.
General Committee Meeting Agenda (Revised)
Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Page 6 of 7
R8. PBS17-043 – Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Project
Recommended:
1. That Report No. PBS17-043 be received; and
2. That the Mayor and Town Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement
with a new landowners group and The Regional Municipality of York, for
an Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Project based on the principles
outlined in this report, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and
Building Services and the Town Solicitor.
R9. PBS17-085 – Proposal for Zoning By-law Amendment Application
Recommended:
1. That Report No. PBS17-085 be received; and
2. That the Zoning By-law Proposals from the following applicants be
accepted as Zoning By-law Amendment Applications:
(a) 2501500 Ontario Inc. (16003 Yonge Street), File No. ZP-2017-09
(b) 2540280 Ontario Inc. (255 Old Yonge Street), File No. ZP-2017-10
(c) Shen & He (15385-15395 Bayview Avenue), File No. ZP-2017-11
R10. IES17-037 – Award of Request for Proposal 2017-81-IES – For
Consulting Services to Develop the Town of Aurora’s
Community Energy Plan
(Added Item – Referred from Council meeting of November 14, 2017)
Recommended:
1. That Report No. IES17-037 be received for information.
General Committee Meeting Agenda (Revised)
Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Page 7 of 7
R11. IES17-041 – Additional Information to Report No. IES17-037 – Award of
Request for Proposal 2017-81-IES – For Consulting
Services to Develop the Town of Aurora’s Community
Energy Plan
(Added Item – Referred from Council meeting of November 14, 2017)
Recommended:
1. That Report No. IES17-041 be received for information.
R12. PRCS17-045 – Award of Tender 2017-117-PRCS Demolition of Two (2)
Buildings Located at 52 and 56 Victoria Street in Aurora
(Added Item)
Recommended:
1. That Report No. PRCS17-045 be received; and
2. That Award of Tender 2017-117-PRCS Demolition of Two (2) Buildings
located at 52 and 56 Victoria Street in Aurora be awarded to Priestly
Demolition Inc. in the amount of $111,300 excluding taxes; and
3. That the Mayor and Town Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary
Agreement, including any and all documents and ancillary agreements
required to give effect to same.
7. Notices of Motion
(a) Councillor Mrakas
Re: Interim Control By-law – Stable Neighbourhoods
8. New Business
9. Closed Session
10. Adjournment
Delegation Request
7KLV'HOHJDWLRQ5HTXHVWIRUPDQGDQ\ZULWWHQVXEPLVVLRQVRUEDFNJURXQGLQIRUPDWLRQ
IRUFRQVLGHUDWLRQE\HLWKHU&RXQFLORU&RPPLWWHHVRI&RXQFLOPXVWEHVXEPLWWHGWRWKH
&OHUN¶VRIILFHE\WKHIROORZLQJGHDGOLQH
4:30 p.m. Two (2) Days Prior to the Requested Meeting Date
Council/Committee/Advisory Committee Meeting Date:
Subject:
Name of Spokesperson:
Name of Group or Person(s) being Represented (if applicable):
Brief Summary of Issue or Purpose of Delegation:
Please complete the following:
+DYH\RXEHHQLQFRQWDFWZLWKD7RZQVWDIIRU
&RXQFLOPHPEHUUHJDUGLQJ\RXUPDWWHURILQWHUHVW"<HV ܆܆1R ܆
,I\HVZLWKZKRP"
'DWH
܆,DFNQRZOHGJHWKDWWKH3URFHGXUH%\ODZSHUPLWVILYHPLQXWHVIRU'HOHJDWLRQV
/HJLVODWLYH6HUYLFHV
&OHUNV#DXURUDFD
7RZQRI$XURUD
-RKQ:HVW:D\%R[
$XURUD21/*-
November 21, 2017 (General Committee)
Request for Council Resolution RE: 16003 Yonge Street and 255 Old Yonge Street
Chad B. John-Baptiste
2501500 Ontario Inc.
2540280 Ontario Inc.
2501500 Ontario Inc. is seeking Council resolution in order to submit a Zoning By-law
Amendment application for a proposed residential development located at 16003 Yonge Street.
2540280 Ontario Inc. is seeking Council resolution in order to submit a Zoning By-law
Amendment application for a proposed residential development located at 255 Old Yonge Street.
✔
Glen Letman
September 28, 2017
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Delegation (b)
Page 1 of 1
Memorandum
Date: November 21, 2017
To: Members of Council
From: Mayor Geoffrey Dawe
Re: Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board Meeting Highlights of October 27, 2017
Recommendation
That Council:
Receive the correspondence for information
Endorse the recommendations
Provide direction
100 John West Way
Box 1000
Aurora, Ontario
L4G 6J1
Phone: 905-727-3123 ext. 4746
Email: mayor@aurora.ca
www.aurora.ca
Town of Aurora
Office of the Mayor
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item C2
Page 1 of 4
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
120 Bayview Parkway, Newmarket, ON, L3Y 3W3
E-mail: info@LSRCA.on.ca Website: www.LSRCA.on.ca
Announcements:
a) General Manager, Corporate & Financial Services
CAO Mike Walters was pleased to introduce Mark Critch, LSRCA’s new General Manager, Corporate and
Financial Services, who joined LSRCA on October 2nd.
b) Thanks to Geranium and Friday Harbour
CAO Mike Walters thanked members of Geranium and Friday Harbour for hosting the meeting, noting it is
great for Board members to be able to see first-hand how the development community and LSRCA
worked very effectively together, as will be evident following the meeting’s presentations.
Presentations:
a) International Riversymposium Presentations by LSRCA’s Rob Baldwin and Brian Kemp
CAO Mike Walters advised that General Managers, Rob Baldwin and Brian Kemp, recently proudly
represented LSRCA at the 20th International Riversymposium in Australia. He advised that LSRCA was the
proud winner of the prestigious Thiess International Riverprize in 2009, and that the 2017 winner is the
San Antonio River in San Antonio, Texas. Both General Managers shared their presentations from the
symposium.
i) Creating a Public-private Relationship
General Manager, Planning & Development, Rob Baldwin’s presentation was about creating a public-
private relationship to achieve maximum benefits in the Lake Simcoe watershed. He noted that intense
growth and development pressures are common around the world and can often result in conflict
between approval agencies and developers. This conflict does little in achieving climate change
resiliency goals, sustainable water management and much more and can result in minimal outcomes
and increased community conflict.
He went on to note that the Lake Simcoe watershed is and will continue to be one of the most
significant growth areas in Canada. LSRCA, charged with protecting and restoring the health of Lake
Simcoe and acting as an environmental extension of municipal government, has adopted an approach
to change the development culture from “fighting for minimums” to “partnering for maximums”.
LSRCA has been fortunate to partner with a willing and significant developer, Geranium Corporation,
who also realizes the traditional approach does not work. Together, LSRCA and Geranium have changed
the relationship to focus on mutual outcomes that surpass all traditional approaches. Mr. Baldwin
introduced Geranium representatives, Cheryl Shindruk, Executive Vice President, and Shauna Dudding,
Senior Vice President, who he has had the pleasure of working with on a number of developments, and
in particular Friday Harbour in Innisfil.
Board Meeting Highlights
October 27, 2017
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item C2
Page 2 of 4
LSRCA Board of Directors
Meeting Highlights – October 27, 2017
Page 2 of 3
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
120 Bayview Parkway, Newmarket, ON, L3Y 3W3
E-mail: info@LSRCA.on.ca Website: www.LSRCA.on.ca
Friday Harbour is a 600-acre, 2,000 unit, marina-based village that includes an 18 hole champion golf
course, 200 acres of nature preserve, a 7.5km trail system and multi-activity beach area. With its
environmental significance, this large development had a very engaged community of members both
for and strongly opposed to it. Leaders of both LSRCA and Geranium embraced an approach based on
science, collaboration, and innovation, which has achieved a positive outcome, socially,
environmentally, and politically.
This presentation can be viewed by following this link: Public-Private Relationship
ii) Twinning Success Story
General Manager, Conservation Lands, Brian Kemp’s presentation was about LSRCA’s twinning success
story. He explained that in 2009, LSRCA won the International RiverFoundation’s (IRF) Thiess
International Riverprize for water management excellence, and along with this award LSRCA was
provided an opportunity to “twin”, or partner, with a developing country, to share expertise in the areas
of integrated watershed management, flood control, public participation, forestry, recreation and
environmental stewardship. In 2011, the journey began with LSRCA’s “twin” – the Junta Intermunicipal
de Medio Ambiente para la Gestión Integral de la Cuenca Baja del Rio Ayuquila (JIRA) and then quickly
expanded in 2013 to include the Centro Universitario de la Costa Sur Universidad de Guadalajara
(CUCSUR – University of Guadalajara) and the Watershed Commission of the Ayuquila-Armeria River
(AAWC). Collectively, the group established a vision to partner to promote integrated watershed
management in the Ayuquila-Armeria River Basin by developing twinning programs to meet the desired
objectives and inspire positive social and environmental change in both countries.
Mr. Kemp described the missions undertaken to date, including visits to the Lake Simcoe watershed by
the twinning partners and visits to Ayuquila watershed by LSRCA staff members, where business plans
have been developed and workshops have been held. He went on to note that this twinning project has
established and implemented many positive outcomes and is considered to be the success that was the
vision of the International RiverFoundation.
This presentation can be viewed by following this link: Twinning Success Story
Correspondence and Staff Reports:
Correspondence
The Board received the following pieces of correspondence:
a) September 22, 2017 letter from the Regional Municipality of York regarding proposed amendments to
the Conservation Authorities Act under Bill 139;
b) September 22, 2017 letter from the Regional Municipality of Peel regarding final comments on Bill 139
- proposed changes to the Ontario Municipal Board Act, Planning Act, and Conservation Authorities
Act; and
c) September 26, 2017 memo from TRCA regarding the Greater Golden Horseshoe Natural Heritage and
Agricultural Systems.
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item C2
Page 3 of 4
LSRCA Board of Directors
Meeting Highlights – October 27, 2017
Page 3 of 3
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
120 Bayview Parkway, Newmarket, ON, L3Y 3W3
E-mail: info@LSRCA.on.ca Website: www.LSRCA.on.ca
Budget Status Report
The Board received Staff Report No. 44-17-BOD, prepared by Manager, Finance, Katherine Toffan, which
provided the Board with a summary of revenues and expenditures for the period ending September 30,
2017.
LSRCA Signing Officers
The Board approved Staff Report No. 45-17-BOD, prepared by Chief Administrative Officer, Mike Walters,
regarding a change in LSRCA’s signing officers with the arrival of new General Manager, Corporate and
Financial Services.
Ghost Canal Wetland Project - RFT #CL-2017-GCWP-001
The Board approved Staff Report No. 46-17-BOD prepared by General Manager, Brian Kemp, which
outlined the tender results for the Ghost Canal Wetland Project and recommended that LSRCA retain
North Gate Farms to undertake the works associated with the Ghost Canal Wetland Project.
For more information or to see the full agenda package, please click the link below for LSRCA’s Board of
Directors’ webpage: LSRCA Board Meetings
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item C2
Page 4 of 4
Town of Aurora
General Committee Report No. IES17-037
Subject: Award of Request for Proposal 2017-81-IES –
For consulting services to develop the Town of Aurora’s
Community Energy Plan
Prepared by: Christina Nagy-Oh, Program Manager, Environmental Initiatives
Department: Infrastructure and Environmental Services
Date: November 7, 2017
Recommendation
1. That Report No. IES17-037 be received; and
2. That Request for Proposal 2017-81-IES – For consulting services to develop
the Town of Aurora’s Community Energy Plan be awarded to IndEco Strategic
Consulting in the amount of $132,660.00, excluding taxes conditional on the
capital project No.42809 approval in the 2018 capital budget; and
3. That the Mayor and Town Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary
Agreement, including any and all documents and ancillary agreements
required to give effect to same.
Executive Summary
To receive Council’s authorization to award RFP 2017-81-IES for consulting services to
develop the Town of Aurora’s Community Energy Plan.
• RFP 2017-81-IES was issued on August 1, 2017 and closed on August 31 2017.
• The evaluation determined that the winning bid was made by IndEco Strategic
Consulting with a total bid price of $132,660.00.
• The Town was awarded grant funding by the MOECC on August 1st 2017 in the
amount of $66,330 which represents 50% of the cost of developing the CEP.
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R10
Page 1 of 5
November 7, 2017 Page 2 of 5 Report No. IES17-037
Background
A Community Energy Plan (CEP) is a comprehensive long term plan to improve energy
efficiency, reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas. It is developed within the
context of the built environment, land use planning, and growth planning and generation
and transmission infrastructure. The CEP results in a comprehensive energy plan that
fosters a culture of conservation, considers the impact of future growth and options for
local clean energy generation and supports economic development by better meeting
local energy needs. The CEP will allow the Town of Aurora to integrate energy planning
into the land use planning process and help develop longer term energy strategies.
The CEP will consist of a Stakeholder Engagement component, followed by a Baseline
Energy Study (BSL), Energy Map(s) and the development of a Community Energy Plan
(CEP). The CEP will identify opportunities for green energy solutions and conservation
measures meant to support local economic development and community objectives of
energy and water conservation, waste and greenhouse gas emission reduction.
The vision for Aurora’s Community Energy Plan (CEP) is “to achieve a healthy
community that is resilient, adaptable, efficient, and economically viable in how it uses
and manages energy through new development and retrofits, land use and
transportation planning, energy generation (including the use of renewables) and
conservation, and industrial processes in order to reduce its reliance on the use of
energy and its carbon footprint.”
Analysis
Proposal evaluations
The Request for Proposal (RFP 2017-81-IES) - Consulting services to develop a Town
wide Community Energy Plan for the Town of Aurora was issued on August 1, 2017 and
closed on August 31 2017. The RFP set out the Terms of Reference for the project
which included a description of the scope of work and deliverables. Eighty percent
(80%) of the evaluation criteria was made up of:
1. Experience and Qualifications of the Firm and Project Team Members (45%); and
2. Project Understanding, Approach and Methodology (35%).
Proponents were required to achieve a minimum score of 70% to proceed to the pricing
phase (56 out of 80 possible points). Evaluation of pricing made up twenty percent
(20%) of the score.
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R10
Page 2 of 5
November 7, 2017 Page 3 of 5 Report No. IES17-037
Proposals were submitted by twelve (12) firms:
• A Kennedy Consulting Ltd.
• Burman Energy Consultants Group Inc.
• FVB Energy Inc.
• IndEco Strategic Consulting
• Integral Group
• Lura Consulting
• R&B Cormier Enterprises Inc.
• Ramboll Environ
• RWDI
• Sustainability Solutions Group
• Urban Equation Corporation
• WalterFedy
Six (6) of the firms scored above the 70% threshold and their pricing was open and
evaluated. The evaluation team determined that the highest ranked proposal was made
by IndEco Strategic Consulting with a cumulative score of 80.8% and total proposal
price of $132,660.
IndEco Strategic Consulting has successfully completed Community Energy Plans for
the City of Markham, Town of Caledon, Region of Waterloo and the City of Kingston to
name a few.
The project is expected to commence in January 2018.
Advisory Committee Review
Not applicable.
Financial Implications
The development of the CEP will cost the town approximately $132,660.00. There is a
2018 budget item to accommodate this cost. Table 2 is a financial summary for Capital
Project No.42809 as based on the Proposal submitted by IndEco Strategic Consulting.
A grant of $66,330.00 which represents 50% of the cost of developing the CEP was
awarded to the Town by MOECC.
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R10
Page 3 of 5
November 7, 2017 Page 4 of 5 Report No. IES17-037
It is recommended that $148,495 be provided from the Studies Reserve Fund for the
Community Energy Plan.
Communications Considerations
Not applicable.
Link to Strategic Plan
Developing a Community Energy Plan will support the Strategic Plan Goal of
Supporting Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability and the objectives of
encouraging the stewardship of Aurora’s natural resources and promoting and
advancing green initiatives.
Alternative(s) to the Recommendation
1. Council may choose to not award this project. The Proposal evaluation process
meets all requirements of the Procurement By-law and awarding this contract is the
next step in fulfilling the requirements of the tendering process. If Council chooses
to not award this contract, than the grant received from the MOECC will not be
utilized and it is worth $66,330.
2018 Budget
2018 Capital Project No. 42809 $132,660
Less previous commitments $0
Non-refundable taxes (1.76%) $2,335
Sub-Total $134,995
Contingency amount (10%) $13,500
Total Funding Required $148,495
Funded by MOECC Grant $66,630.00
Net Town Funding $81,865.00
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R10
Page 4 of 5
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R10 Page 5 of 5
Town of Aurora
Council Report No. IES17-041
Subject: Additional Information Report Item R8,
General Committee Meeting November 7, 2017
Award of RFP – Community Energy Plan
Prepared by: Christina Nagy-Oh, Program Manager Environmental Initiatives
Department: Infrastructure and Environmental Services
Date: November 14, 2017
Recommendation
1. That Report No. IES17-041 be received for information.
Executive Summary
The purpose of this report is to provide Council additional information regarding the
development of a Community Energy Plan for The Town of Aurora. Development of the
CEP is required for Aurora to have access to Municipalities for Climate Innovation
Program, up to $10 million, and estimated at $1.8 billion from the Cap and Trade
Program.
Background
On April 25, 2017 Council passed the following Resolution:
Whereas municipalities around the world are taking the lead on climate
change with sustainable and responsible policies that will reduce their Carbon
Footprint; and
Whereas municipalities are developing Energy Plans that are both
environmentally progressive and economically viable; and
Whereas Aurora’s Infrastructure and Environmental Services (IES) Project 10-
Year Plan has already allocated $100,000 for such a potential project, for
future Budget consideration; and
Whereas the Provincial Ministry of Energy has established, and is funding
through the Ministry of Environment, a Municipal Energy Plan Program, which
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R11
Page 1 of 7
November 14, 2017 Page 2 of 7 Report No. IES17-041
may offer municipalities matching funds of up to $90,000 to support the
development of a Community Energy Plan; and
Whereas Newmarket’s Community Energy Plan received $90,000, Markham’s
received $90,000, and Vaughan’s received $54,000;
1. Now Therefore Be It Hereby Resolved That staff be directed to prepare a
Terms of Reference and a budget for a Community Energy Plan for
Council’s consideration as part of the 2018 Budget.
Analysis
Community Energy Plan vs Corporate Environmental Action Plan vs Corporate
Energy Management Plan
The Town has two existing environmental plans. The Corporate Environmental Action
Plan (CEAP) and the Corporate Energy Management Plan (CEMP). Both of these plans
consider only actions that the corporation is required to do regarding the facilities, fleet,
town owned land, staff, town events, purchasing, staff related travel and actions
whereby the corporation interacts with the environment. Neither of these plans
consulted with local businesses, schools, local energy or natural gas distribution
companies, other governmental organizations in their development, goals or
implementation considerations. Neither of the Town’s existing plans encourage
developing relationships, circles of influence, community programs that have the ability
to encourage or influence behaviour change within the community. Examples:
• Green development policies can encourage greater sustainable development
from the building community;
• Energy retrofit incentive programs can encourage residents to modify their
homes in a more energy efficient manner; and
• Implementing recycling or composting waste stream programs in high rise
buildings, schools and creating or partnering in education and awareness of
these programs all impact the carbon footprint of the Town as a whole.
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R11
Page 2 of 7
November 14, 2017 Page 3 of 7 Report No. IES17-041
Corporate Environmental Action Plan (2010) is a five-year action plan that allows the
Corporation of Town of Aurora to meet its environmental goals. Purpose:
• Protect and enhance the natural environment;
• Promote environmental sustainability, integrity and conservation of resources;
and
• Create a practice of environmental stewardship within the community
Corporate Energy Management Plan (2013) is a five year plan that the corporation
will take to increase its energy efficiency, reduce its energy consumption, and minimize
its environmental footprint. The Town’s vision is to establish a culture of energy
conservation, while contributing to global reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. This
plan is intended to assist the Town in complying with the corporate energy management
planning requirements of Ontario Regulation 397/11 under the Green Energy Act (2009)
A Community Energy Plan (CEP) is a comprehensive long-term plan that serves to
define community priorities around energy. It explores how energy is and could be used,
generated, and delivered in the community now and into the future. It aims to improve
energy efficiency, reduce energy use and greenhouse gas emissions, and foster green
energy solutions at the local level, while helping to plan ahead for the future growth and
development, energy generation, delivery and use in a community.
Funding Options for CEP development
Staff plan to apply for funding to develop the CEP to a secondary grant source, the FCM
Municipalities for Climate Innovation Program. This grant will not conflict with the MOE
funding that the Town has already been awarded.
Benefits of developing a CEP
The CEP will play a key role in attracting quality investment, in ensuring reliable and
affordable energy, in reducing environmental impacts and in enhancing Aurora’s
competitiveness. Additional CEP benefits are:
• Improve energy efficiency;
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R11
Page 3 of 7
November 14, 2017 Page 4 of 7 Report No. IES17-041
• Retain energy dollars within the community;
• Reduce greenhouse gas emissions;
• Improve resident health through improved air quality and increased active
transportation;
• Foster local sustainable energy solutions in the community;
• Support local economic development and green job creation;
• Design a local energy strategy for a more sustainable, energy secure future;
• Reduce energy costs and direct these savings to other community priorities;
• Foster innovation and leadership in energy planning and renewable energy
development;
• Support greener development and greener transportation system; and
• Support energy innovation, economic competitive advantage, local investment.
Aurora’s motivation to develop a CEP
• Requirement to apply for funding programs – financial incentives available
through the GHG Reduction Challenge Fund (up to 10 Million);
• Development of the CEP is required for Aurora to have access to the Municipal
Challenge Fund, estimated at $1.8 Billion, from the Cap and Trade Program;
• CEPs required for Partners for Climate Protection (PCP) Campaign Milestones.
61 Ontario Municipalities are registered for the PCP program;
• Job creation from energy efficiency, energy generation and associated products
and services; and
• Solar, wind, combined heat and power opportunities.
Many municipalities have developed CEPs in Ontario and Canada
Over the past five years an increasing number of municipalities across Ontario and
Canada have undertaken the development of CEPs: Mississauga, Sudbury, Kingston,
Temiskaming Shores, Chatham Kent, Newmarket, Markham, Windsor, Middlesex
Centre, Bayham, Toronto, Kenora, Durham Region, Waterloo Region, Kitchener,
Cambridge, Waterloo, Woolwich, Wellesley, North Dumfries, Ajax, Brock, Clarington,
Oshawa, Pickering, Scugog, Uxbridge, Whitby, Burlington, Sault Ste. Marie, Caledon,
Guelph and London.
Currently CEPs are being implemented in Kingston, Vaughan, Chatham-Kent, Sault
Ste. Marie, Wawa, Temiskaming Shores, Woodstock, Halton Hills, and Oakville.
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R11
Page 4 of 7
November 14, 2017 Page 5 of 7 Report No. IES17-041
Other municipalities experience and benefits in developing and implementing
CEPs
Town of Halton Hill’s states that their Community Energy Plan fulfils the first three
milestones of the FCM Partners for Climate Protection program by:
• Creating a community-wide greenhouse gas emissions inventory;
• Setting a greenhouse gas emission reduction target; and
• Identifying actions that need to be taken to achieve greenhouse gas reductions.
For the community as a whole, the Energy Plan sets the following targets:
• 35% reduction in per capita greenhouse gas emissions by 2031– compared to
2011 levels.
• 14% reduction in total greenhouse gas emissions by 2031.
Implementation is projected to:
• Reduce annual energy costs by $17 million ($271 in total).
• Create over 200 new jobs.
Newmarket has a 2018 budget request in for the implementation of their CEP.
Newmarket was mandated to do the CEP through the Region’s OP and Newmarket’s
Secondary plan. Benefit to preparing plan is access to grant funding. Staff said that they
had a good experience creating the plan. The Newmarket Energy Efficiency Retrofit
Program has been set up to generate a return on investment or at the least be cost
neutral to the Town. The business case to prove this has not been completed to date.
York Region’s Climate- Related Initiatives
York Region will be developing a region-wide MEP as a component of the York Region
Climate Change Action Plan. This will be developed through the Municipal
Comprehensive review and will address energy use and greenhouse gas emissions
across a broad range of sectors including residential, commercial, industrial and
transportation sources. It will also inform official plan policy development to ensure
alignment between growth management, built environment and energy planning
decisions to support improved community resiliency.
Local Municipalities in York Region are required to develop their own Energy
Conservation and Demand Management Plans under the Green Energy Act, 2009 and
Ontario Regulation 397/11. Local Municipalities are also encouraged to develop
Municipal energy plans through the Ministry of Energy. The Regional Community
Energy Plan will leverage and build upon existing community energy plans developed
by the Town of East Gwillimbury, Markham, Newmarket and Vaughan.
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R11
Page 5 of 7
November 14, 2017 Page 6 of 7 Report No. IES17-041
Advisory Committee Review
As captured in the EAC minutes of October 5, 2017, staff had discussed the upcoming
budget item of developing the CEP. EAC members welcomed the idea of the town
developing a CEP and that staff obtained a 50% grant to help pay for the plan.
Financial Implications
The financial costs are identified in Report No. IES17-037.
Communications Considerations
Not applicable.
Link to Strategic Plan
The proposed program update supports the Strategic Plan Goal of Supporting
Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability and the objectives of encouraging
the stewardship of Aurora’s natural resources and promoting and advancing
green initiatives.
Alternative(s) to the Recommendation
Not applicable.
Conclusions
It is an opportune time for Aurora to develop a Community Energy Plan, given the
financial incentives available for energy efficiency measures from the Ministry of Energy
& Climate Change. Development of a CEP is required for Aurora to have access to
Municipalities for Climate Innovation Program, up to $10 million and the estimated $1.8
billion, from the Cap and Trade Program. These incentives will reduce the costs of
implementing the actions identified in the Plan, and will further enhance the financial
benefits of energy efficiency measures for the Town. The CEP is expected to deliver
practical actions that will translate into measurable financial benefits, efficiencies,
reduced operating costs, lower greenhouse gas emissions, community awareness and
corporate leadership. It will not only meet the Towns obligations under the Green
Energy Act, but will also fulfill its commitments under the Federation of Canadian
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R11
Page 6 of 7
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R11 Page 7 of 7
Town of Aurora
General Committee Report No. PRCS17-045
Subject: Award of Tender 2017-117-PRCS Demolition of Two (2) Buildings
Located at 52 and 56 Victoria Street in Aurora
Prepared by: Allan D. Downey, Director, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
Department: Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
Date: November 21, 2017
Recommendation
1. That Report No. PRCS17-045 be received; and
2. That Tender 2017-117-PRCS Award of Tender 2017-117-PRCS Demolition of
Two (2) Buildings located at 52 and 56 Victoria Street in Aurora be awarded to
Priestly Demolition Inc. in the amount of $111,300 excluding taxes; and
3. That the Mayor and Town Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary
Agreement, including any and all documents and ancillary agreements
required to give effect to same.
Executive Summary
The purpose of this report is to approve the Award of Tender 2017-117-PRCS
Demolition of Two (2) Buildings Located at 52 and 56 Victoria Street in Aurora as
follows:
• To obtain Council approval to award Tender 2017-117-PRCS to Priestly
Demolition Inc.
• Both facilities have been evaluated for the presence of dangerous substances
• Staff received twelve bids for evaluation
Background
Council approved the demolition of 52 and 56 Victoria Street at their December 5, 2016
meeting.
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R12
Page 1 of 4
November 21, 2017 Page 2 of 4 Report No. PRCS17-045
Analysis
Both facilities have been evaluated for the presence of dangerous substances
During the tendering period, consultants were engaged to determine if either 52 or 56
Victoria Street contained dangerous substances that would require abatement removal
prior to demolition.
Both facilities received a clean report for both asbestos and lead. Since neither
substance is present, demolition can commence upon approval of the tender.
Staff received twelve bids for evaluation
Staff released Tender 2017-117-PRCS for Demolition of Two (2) Buildings Located at
52 and 56 Victoria Street in Aurora the Town of Aurora on September 22, 2017.
Tender 2017-117-PRCS closed on November 13, 2017 and a total of twelve (12) firms
submitted Tenders. All twelve (12) Tenders were deemed compliant.
The lowest compliant Tender was submitted by Priestly Demolition Inc. at $111,300
excluding taxes. The below Table is a breakdown of compliant prices submitted for
Tender 2017-117-PRCS.
Firm Bid Amount
Priestly Demolition Inc. $111,300
Salandria LTD. $142,000
United Wrecking Inc. $145,800
MGI Construction Corp. $163,000
JMX Contracting $188,000
Jones Group Inc. $192,000
Budget Environmental Disposal Inc. $197,683
GFL Infrastructure Group $199,300
Highpoint Environmental Services Inc. $218,800
The Cannington Group $234,000
Rafat General Contractor Inc. $259,200
Tri-Phase Environmental Inc. $570,755
Advisory Committee Review
Not applicable.
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R12
Page 2 of 4
November 21, 2017 Page 3 of 4 Report No. PRCS17-045
Financial Implications
The approved Capital Budget for Project 81019 Demolition of 52 and 56 Victoria Street
is $500,000. The below Table is a financial summary for Capital Project 81019 as
based on the Tender submitted by Priestly Demolition Inc.:
Approved Budget
Capital Project 81019 $500,000
Total Approved Budget $500,000
Less previous commitments $7,278
Funding available for subject Contract $492,722
Contract Award excluding HST $111,300
Non-refundable taxes (1.76%) $1,959
10% Project Contingency $11,130
Sub-Total $124,389
Total Funding Required $124,389
Budget Variance $368,333
*Previous Commitments included site surveying, and detailed design costs
Communications Considerations
There is no external communication required.
Link to Strategic Plan
The Award of Tender for the demolition of 52 and 56 Victoria Street in Aurora supports
the Strategic Plan in the redevelopment of Library Square.
Alternative(s) to the Recommendation
None.
Conclusions
Based on the lowest compliant bid submitted for this project and the positive references
obtained by staff on the past performance of this contractor, staff recommends awarding
Tender No. 2017-117-PRCS Demolition of Two (2) Buildings Located at 52 and 56
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Item R12
Page 3 of 4
Additional Items to General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 2017Item R12 Page 4 of 4