Agenda - Committee of the Whole - 20260908Town of Aurora
Committee of the Whole
Meeting Revised Agenda
Date:Tuesday, September 8, 2026
Time:7 p.m.
Location:Council Chambers, Aurora Town Hall
Meetings are available to the public in person and via live stream on the Town’s YouTube channel.
To participate, please visit aurora.ca/participation.
Pages
1.Call to Order
Note: Added items are marked with an asterisk (*).
2.Land Acknowledgement
3.Approval of the Agenda
4.Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
5.Community Presentations
6.Delegations
6.1 Adrian Travis, Resident; Re: Town of Aurora Security Deposit Policy 1
*6.2 Kathie Sharkey, Storm Volleyball; Re: Significant Increase in YRDSB
Permit Fees
16
7.Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
7.1 Active Transportation and Traffic Safety Advisory Committee Meeting
Minutes of May 27, 2026
20
That the Active Transportation and Traffic Safety Advisory
Committee Meeting Minutes of May 27, 2026, be received for
information.
1.
7.2 Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee Meeting Minutes of June 3, 2026 24
That the Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee Meeting
Minutes of June 3, 2026, be received for information.
1.
7.3 Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of June 8, 2026 30
That the Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of June
8, 2026, be received for information.
1.
7.4 Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2026 35
That the Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of
June 10, 2026, be received for information.
1.
7.5 Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes of June 18, 2026 39
That the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes of
June 18, 2026, be received for information.
1.
7.6 Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee Meeting Minutes of June 24,
2026
43
That the Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee Meeting
Minutes of June 24, 2026, be received for information.
1.
7.7 Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee Meeting Minutes of August 5,
2026
46
That the Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee Meeting
Minutes of August 5, 2026, be received for information.
1.
7.8 Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes of August 27, 2026 50
That the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes of
August 27, 2026, be received for information.
1.
8.Consent Agenda
9.Community Services Committee Agenda
10.Corporate Services Committee Agenda
10.1 CS26-019 - Dust By-law 54
That Report No. CS26-019 be received; and1.
That a by-law to regulate dust be brought forward to a future
Council meeting for enactment; and
2.
That a by-law to amend the penalty amounts in the
Administrative Monetary Penalty System By-law be brought
forward to a future Council meeting.
3.
10.2 CS26-020 - Fence By-law Variance Request - 10 Northern Dancer Lane 68
That Report No. CS26-020 be received; and1.
That a variance to Fence By-law No. 6429-22 to permit the
construction of a non-compliant fence in the front yard of 10
Northern Dancer Lane be denied.
2.
10.3 CS26-021 - By-law Requirements for Hedges 75
That Report No.CS26-021 be received for information.1.
10.4 CS26-022 - Cannabis Retail Review Task Force - Findings and
Recommendations
82
That Report No. CS26-022 be received; and1.
That the Local Actions set out in the Recommendations section
of the final report of the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force be
implemented; and
2.
That the final report of the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
be circulated to York Regional Police, the Premier of Ontario,
the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Alcohol and
Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO), Local Members of
Provincial Parliament, the Association of Municipalities (AMO)
and all municipalities in Ontario for consideration and support.
3.
11.Finance and Information Technology Committee Agenda
12.Administration Committee Agenda
13.Operational Services Committee Agenda
13.1 OPS26-017 - Summer Storm Update - A Road to Recovery 96
That Report No. OPS26-017 be received for information.1.
14.Planning and Development Services Committee Agenda
15.Member Motions
*15.1 Councillor Gaertner; Re: Use of the Council Conference Budget 104
*15.2 Councillor Weese; Re: Review of York Region District School Board
(YRDSB) Gymnasium Permitting Fee Schedule
105
16.Regional Report
16.1 York Regional Council Highlights of June 25, 2026 108
That the York Regional Council Highlights of June 25, 2026, be
received for information.
1.
17.New Business
18.Public Service Announcements
19.Closed Session
20.Adjournment
100 John West Way
Aurora, Ontario
L4G 6J1
(905) 727-3123
aurora.ca
Subject *
Town of Aurora Security Deposit Policy
Full Name of Spokesperson and Name of Group or Person(s) being Represented (if applicable) *
Adrian Travis, Resident 125 Tyler Street, Aurora
Brief Summary of Issue or Purpose of Delegation *
We would like to draw to Council's attention a procedural problem with how building permit security deposits
are handled in the Town of Aurora. The 5-minute presentation will draw upon precise representations the
Town of Aurora has made regarding return of security deposit funds, which in our case totals more than
$30,000. How the Town of Aurora staff has mischaracterized and mishandled this process will be discussed,
drawing upon actual documents and facts. Implications will be discussed in terms of what Aurora can do to be
a more favorable jurisdiction to build homes in, eliminate barriers to building homes, and why we as residents
cannot consider building another home in Aurora in the future. We will also discuss briefly how we plan to
make this an election conversation this fall in Aurora.
Have you been in contact with a Town staff or Council member regarding your matter of interest? *
Yes No
Full name of the Town staff or Council member
with whom you spoke
Rachel Gililand
Date you spoke with Town staff or a Council
member
2026-8-4
Council or Committee (Choose One) *
Committee of the Whole
Delegation Request
This request and any written submissions or background information for consideration by either Council or
Committees of Council is being submitted to Legislative Services.
Deadlines for Submission:
For Committee of the Whole meetings, no later than 9 a.m. on the scheduled meeting date.
For Council meetings, no later than 9 a.m. one business day prior to the scheduled meeting date.
Council or Committee Meeting Date *
2026-9-08
Page 1 of 114
I acknowledge that the Procedure By-law permits five (5) minutes for Delegations. *
Agree
I acknowledge that I understand and accept the delegate conduct expectations as outlined in Section
32 of the Procedure By-law 6228-19, as amended (link below) *
Agree
Click to view Procedure By-law 6228-19, as amended.
Page 2 of 114
Town of Aurora
Security Deposit Policy
Delegation Agenda Item 6.1
Adrian Travis 125 Tyler Street, Aurora ON L4G 2M5
September 8, 2026
Page 3 of 114
Page 4 of 114
The Town of Aurora Required four
separate trips to different
departments.
$10,000 to Building Department
on July 4
$1,500 to Roads Department on
July 16
$20,000 to the Parks Department
on Sept 4
$3,500 further to Roads on Sept 5
after ‘additional securities’
requested.
A further $20,180 in security was
requested on Sept 24 but was
rejected as excessive.
Security Deposits Were Paid in 2024 totaling $35,000
Page 5 of 114
Source: Town of Aurora By-laws found on records.aurora.ca
Legal Framework and Authority
The Town of Aurora may collect a Security deposit for Road Damage under By-law 6288-20
May collect a Security deposit for site alteration under By-law 6226-19
The Town of Aurora may collect a Tree Destruction Deposit through an Undertaking
The Building Code Act, 1992 and By-law 6096-18 authorizes fees and “administrative requirements”
How to get your money back after building a home in Aurora is less clear…
Page 6 of 114
The Town of Aurora permit document
characterizes that a final inspection
occurs when all work and restorations are
completed.
Source: Town of Aurora Road Occupancy Permit No. PW20240706 – Dated 7 November 2024
Town of Aurora Permit Document
Page 7 of 114
Source: Town of Aurora 2025 Consolidated Financial Statements Page 19
Town of Aurora Accounting Policies
Town Financial Statements are Audited by
KPMG LLP and list a summary of
significant accounting policies. Deposits
are held until the work has been
completed.
Page 8 of 114
The Town of Aurora represents publicly
that deposits are refundable after all
repairs to the town land are completed
and approved by the Town.
Source: https://www.aurora.ca/town-services/roads-and-traffic/road-occupancy-permits/
The Town of Aurora Website – Road Occupancy Example
Page 9 of 114
Source: Picture taken 2 September 2026
Sidewalk and Curb Work Was Completed
Paving and concrete work completed on
July 23, 2026.
Page 10 of 114
Source: Road Permit correspondence dated July 31, 2026
Relevant Work Passes Inspection; Refund Denied Until July 2027
Inspection occurred on July 30.
Coordinator, Applications and Permits
(Roads) refers to norms as a basis for
retaining deposits for a further one-year
warranty period.
“No outstanding issues” following
inspection.
Page 11 of 114
Source: Email to Employee Dan Naccarato on 7 August 2026
Clarity Sought
Clarity around the specific by-law,
permit condition or written policy being
relied upon was requested, among other
things.
Page 12 of 114
Source: Email dated 7 August 2026 from Employee Dan Naccarato
Clarity Denied
Town of Aurora Employee Dan
Naccarato does not address any
concern or question raised.
“The Town’s position has not
changed.”
Page 13 of 114
Source: Town of Aurora 2025 Consolidated Financial Statements Page 31
The Town of Aurora Held $5,191,000 in Deposits on Dec 31, 2025
Page 14 of 114
Process Recommendations for Town Council
Should the Town of Aurora continue to manage $5,000,000 in public deposit money based on norms?
1.Make Security Deposit Requirements Transparent (See King City or Vaughan Websites)
2.Centralize a Fragmented Security Deposit Collection and Refund Process
3.Clarify Triggers for Refund, Publish Them, Monitor Adherence
4.Set a Service Standard or Goal in Calendar Days for Return of Funds
WHY?
Barriers to building is one of the Top 3 Election Issues this fall in Aurora. Is Aurora’s development
and building permit process transparent, predictable and proportional?
Page 15 of 114
100 John West Way
Aurora, Ontario
L4G 6J1
(905) 727-3123
aurora.ca
Delegation Request
This request and any written submissions or background information for consideration by either Council or
Committees of Council is being submitted to Legislative Services.
Deadlines for Submission:
For Committee of the Whole meetings, no later than 9 a.m. on the scheduled meeting date.
For Council meetings, no later than 9 a.m. one business day prior to the scheduled meeting date.
Council or Committee (Choose One) *
Committee of the Whole
Council or Committee Meeting Date *
2026-9-8
Subject *
Significant Increase in YRDSB Permit Fees
Full Name of Spokesperson and Name of Group or Person(s) being Represented (if applicable) *
Kathie Sharkey of Storm Volleyball
Brief Summary of Issue or Purpose of Delegation *
Express concern over the unprecedented increase in YRDSB permit fees for gyms. Cost Impact to
organizations that would need to pass the increases to families that may no longer be able to afford to have
their children participate. This in turn will reduce participation and potentially increase fees further in order for
the organization to survive, or the organization may have to close. There must be a political voice that can
reason with the school board or the province to prevent this from taking healthy activity and personal growth
away from the youth of our community.
Have you been in contact with a Town staff or Council member regarding your matter of interest? *
Yes No
Full name of the Town staff or Council member
with whom you spoke
Ron Weese
Date you spoke with Town staff or a Council
member
2026-8-28
I acknowledge that the Procedure By-law permits five (5) minutes for Delegations. *
Agree
Page 16 of 114
I acknowledge that I understand and accept the delegate conduct expectations as outlined in Section
32 of the Procedure By-law 6228-19, as amended (link below) *
Agree
Click to view Procedure By-law 6228-19, as amended.
Page 17 of 114
This is where we run Skill Dvlp Programs for 7 to 15 year olds
Notice how Regular cost is up 18K and Subsidy is down 33K
We run REP Practices in this single gym
We run REP Practices in this double gym
ESC (old Williams)(Sun)2026/2027 2025/2026 2024/2025 2023/2024
264.1%
Hartman PS (Wed)2026/2027 2025/2026 2024/2025 2023/2024
674.6%
Aurora High (Mon)2026/2027 2025/2026 2024/2025 2023/2024
1310.8%
Regular Cost 73,013.99 54,784.66 38,580.57 38,836.14
Subsidy 3,909.66 36,989.73 28,295.12 28,157.39
After Subsidy Cost 69,104.33 17,794.93 10,285.45 10,678.75
Number of Days/Nights 35 35 34 34
Number of Hours 8 7.5 7.5 7.5
Cost per Day 1,974.41 508.43 302.51 314.08
Cost per Hour 246.80 67.79 40.34 41.88
Percentage Increase/Hour 68.1%-3.7%
Regular Cost 6,460.95 899.12 773.86 701.16
Subsidy 581.35 140.08 136.29 124.48
After Subsidy Cost 5,879.60 759.04 637.57 576.68
Number of Days/Nights 35 35 35 34
Number of Hours 4.25 4.25 4.25 4
Cost per Day 167.99 21.69 18.22 16.96
Cost per Hour 39.53 5.10 4.29 4.24
Percentage Increase/Hour 19.1%1.1%
Regular Cost 6,175.45 466.79 371.35 417.64
Subsidy 627.90 60.45 62.08 62.08
After Subsidy Cost 5,547.55 406.34 309.27 355.56
Number of Days/Nights 30 31 32 33
Number of Hours 2 2 2 2
Cost per Day 184.92 13.11 9.66 10.77
Cost per Hour 92.46 6.55 4.83 5.39
Percentage Increase/Hour 35.6%-10.3%
Page 18 of 114
We Host about 16 tournaments a season in this gym
Notice how Regular cost is up 55K and Subsidy is down 55K
This is a comparison of Fees for an 18U athlete. The 2026/27 Fee is still a work in
progress but the primary increase is for Facilities.
How many families can afford an increase of this size? What about 2 athletes?
What does this do to an athlete if they can no longer participate due to cost?
What does this do to a family that breaks the bank to cover the extra cost?
Huron Hts 2 Gyms (Sat)2026/2027 2025/2026 2024/2025 2023/2024
338.3%
Youth Volleyball in Ontario has more than doubled over the last decade with double
digit spikes in 2024 & 2025 of 15%, well over the avg. of 5%. There were 831 regular
season tournaments this past season, ending with a record breaking 1,338 teams at
Ontario Championships playing across a 58 court venue in Toronto plus 68 teams
at another venue in Niagara Falls.
Active Beach Volleyball teams are up 44% since 2024
The Women's National Indoor Team has qualified for the Olympics LA 28, first time
since 1996 so that will boost growth and participation even more
The Men's Team has boosted the growth for Boys by 23% since Paris 2024
Regular Cost 147,696.81 92,066.26 74,148.34 38,494.66
Subsidy 7,331.20 62,392.20 55,367.18 27,956.02
After Subsidy Cost 140,365.61 29,674.06 18,781.16 10,538.64
Number of Days/Nights 32 31 31 21
Number of Hours 11.5 11 12.5 12
Cost per Day 4,386.43 957.23 605.84 501.84
Cost per Hour 381.43 87.02 48.47 41.82
Percentage Increase/Hour 79.5%15.9%
Page 19 of 114
Town of Aurora
Active Transportation and Traffic Safety Advisory Committee
Meeting Minutes
Date:
Time:
Location:
Wednesday, May 27, 2026
7 p.m.
Holland Room, Aurora Town Hall
Committee Members: Councillor Wendy Gaertner, Chair
Owen Heritage, Vice Chair
John David McLaughlin
Gino Martino
Members Absent: Steve Fleck
Lil Kim
Heidi Schellhorn
Other Attendees: Michael Bat, Traffic and Transportation Analyst
Michael Ha, Traffic and Transportation Analyst
Julia Shipcott, Council/Committee Coordinator
_____________________________________________________________________
1. Call to Order
The Chair called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
2. Land Acknowledgement
The Committee acknowledged that the meeting took place on Anishinaabe lands,
the traditional and treaty territory of the Chippewas of Georgina Island,
recognizing the many other Nations whose presence here continues to this day,
the special relationship the Chippewas have with the lands and waters of this
territory, and that Aurora has shared responsibility for the stewardship of these
lands and waters. It was noted that Aurora is part of the treaty lands of the
Mississaugas and Chippewas, recognized through Treaty #13 and the Williams
Treaties of 1923.
Page 20 of 114
Active Transportation and Traffic Safety Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
May 27, 2026 2
3. Approval of the Agenda
Moved by Owen Heritage
Seconded by Gino Martino
That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved.
Carried
4. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
There were no declarations of pecuniary interest under the Municipal Conflict of
Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M.50.
5. Receipt of the Minutes
5.1 Active Transportation and Traffic Safety Advisory Committee Meeting
Minutes of March 25, 2026
Moved by John David McLaughlin
Seconded by Gino Martino
1. That the Active Transportation and Traffic Safety Advisory Committee
meeting minutes of March 25, 2026, be received for information.
Carried
6. Delegations
None.
7. Matters for Consideration
7.1 Memorandum from Transportation and Traffic Analyst; Re: Pedestrian
Facility Plan Project Introduction
Staff provided a brief overview of the importance of a walkability study
when considering future growth, and introduced Gordon Hui, P.Eng., of
R.J. Burnside and Associates Ltd. who presented the Pedestrian Facility
Plan. Gordon spoke to the key objectives of reviewing existing policies and
pedestrian networks, developing frameworks to identify sidewalk gaps,
Page 21 of 114
Active Transportation and Traffic Safety Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
May 27, 2026 3
pedestrian crossovers and school crossing guard requirements, and the
development of a program to prioritize projects, identify costs and funding
opportunities. The study is expected to be completed in Q1 of 2027.
The Committee provided suggestions on gaining access to police data of
near-miss incidents in school areas, as well as prioritizing trail
connections, the installation of sidewalks and school crossing guards
where neighbourhood support is lacking, and areas where existing utilities
may block installation. Also noted was the consideration to improve
lighting in areas currently under-lit. The Committee was supportive of the
Pedestrian Facility Plan building on the Active Transportation Master Plan
and suggested referencing the Ontario Traffic Council School Crossing
Guard Guide.
The Chair inquired about pedestrian crossover partnership opportunities
with the private sector, and spoke to concerns with commercial
establishments not continuing sidewalks across their properties.
Moved by Owen Heritage
Seconded by Gino Martino
1. That the memorandum and presentation regarding Pedestrian Facility
Plan Project Introduction be received; and
2. That the Active Transportation and Traffic Safety Advisory Committee
comments regarding the Pedestrian Facility Plan Project Introduction
be received and referred to staff for consideration and further action as
appropriate.
Carried
8. Informational Items
The Committee inquired about the timing of notification of advisory committees
for the new 2026-2030 term.
9. New Business
The Committee congratulated Councillor Gaertner on her retirement and thanked
her for her service.
Page 22 of 114
Active Transportation and Traffic Safety Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
May 27, 2026 4
10. Adjournment
Moved by Owen Heritage
Seconded by Gino Martino
That the meeting be adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
Carried
Page 23 of 114
Town of Aurora
Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee
Meeting Minutes
Date:
Time:
Location:
Wednesday, June 3, 2026
10 a.m.
Video Conference
Committee Members: Angela Covert, Chair
Robert Gaby
Manuel Veloso, Vice Chair
Ping Zhang
Members Absent: Elliott Elia
Other Attendees: Daniel Ruberto, Deputy Town Clerk
Julia Shipcott, Council/Committee Coordinator
_____________________________________________________________________
1. Call to Order
The Chair called the meeting to order at 10:05 a.m.
The Chair was delegated to Vice-Chair Manuel Veloso at 11:33 a.m. and
relinquished at 11:47 a.m.
The Committee consented to consider items in the following order: 7.1, 7.6, 7.5,
7.4, 7.2, 7.3, 7.8, 7.7 and 7.9 with the rest of the items following the order
presented on the agenda.
2. Land Acknowledgement
The Committee acknowledged that the meeting took place on Anishinaabe lands,
the traditional and treaty territory of the Chippewas of Georgina Island,
recognizing the many other Nations whose presence here continues to this day,
the special relationship the Chippewas have with the lands and waters of this
territory, and that Aurora has shared responsibility for the stewardship of these
Page 24 of 114
Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee Meeting Minutes
June 3, 2026 2
lands and waters. It was noted that Aurora is part of the treaty lands of the
Mississaugas and Chippewas, recognized through Treaty #13 and the Williams
Treaties of 1923.
3. Approval of the Agenda
Moved by Ping Zhang
Seconded by Robert Gaby
That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved.
Carried
4. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
Pursuant to the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M.50, the Chair
declared a pecuniary interest relating to item 7.9 due to her affiliation with the
Salvation Army which provides programs in collaboration with the York Region
Food Network, and therefore did not participate in the discussion or vote on any
question in respect to the matter.
5. Receipt of the Minutes
5.1 Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee Meeting Minutes of April 1, 2026
Moved by Robert Gaby
Seconded by Manuel Veloso
1. That the Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee meeting minutes of
April 1, 2026, be received for information.
Carried
6. Delegations
None.
7. Matters for Consideration
7.1 Application from Bereaved Families of Ontario - York Region; Re: Funding
for Continuation of Free Bereavement Support Programs
Page 25 of 114
Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee Meeting Minutes
June 3, 2026 3
Moved by Ping Zhang
Seconded by Manuel Veloso
1. That the Application from Bereaved Families of Ontario - York Region;
Re: Funding for Continuation of Free Bereavement Support Programs
be received; and
2. That the Committee grant the funding request in the amount of $5,000.
Carried
7.2 Application from Huayun (Aurora) Multicultural Association; Re: Funding for
Rental Space for Senior Weekly Wellness and Cultural Activities
Moved by Robert Gaby
Seconded by Manuel Veloso
1. That the Application from Huayun (Aurora) Multicultural Association;
Re: Funding for Rental Space for Senior Weekly Wellness and Cultural
Activities be received; and
2. That the Committee grant the funding request in the amount of $5,000.
Carried
7.3 Application from CHATS - Community & Home Assistance to Seniors; Re:
Funding for Programs and Services for Older Adults Living in Aurora
Moved by Manuel Veloso
Seconded by Ping Zhang
1. That the Application from CHATS - Community & Home Assistance to
Seniors; Re: Funding for Programs and Services for Older Adults Living
in Aurora be received; and
2. That the Committee grant the funding request in the amount of $5,000.
Carried
7.4 Application from Aurora Hewy Christmas Classic; Re: Funding for Annual
Community Fundraising Event
Moved by Ping Zhang
Seconded by Manuel Veloso
1. That the Application from Aurora Hewy Christmas Classic; Re: Funding
for Annual Community Fundraising Event be received; and
Page 26 of 114
Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee Meeting Minutes
June 3, 2026 4
2. That the Committee grant the funding request in the amount of $3,000.
Carried
7.5 Application from Victim Services of York Region; Re: Funding for Youth
Empowering Youth in York Region Program
Moved by Ping Zhang
Seconded by Manuel Veloso
1. That the Application from Victim Services of York Region; Re: Funding
for Youth Empowering Youth in York Region Program be received; and
2. That the Committee grant the funding request in the amount of $5,000.
Carried
7.6 Application from Voices of Joy Community Choir; Re: Funding for Ongoing
Operations and Expenses
Moved by Manuel Veloso
Seconded by Robert Gaby
1. That the Application from Voices of Joy Community Choir; Re: Funding
for Ongoing Operations and Expenses be deferred to a future meeting,
to provide the applicant the opportunity to submit budgetary
documents.
Carried
7.7 Application from Active Minds Home Child Care Agency; Re: Funding for
Essential Equipment for Special Needs Child
Moved by Manuel Veloso
Seconded by Robert Gaby
1. That the Application from Active Minds Home Child Care Agency; Re:
Funding for Essential Equipment for Special Needs Child be denied.
Carried
7.8 Application from Dr. G.W. Williams Secondary School Grade 11 Students
Erke Baitukenova and Sitara Sisavang; Re: Funding for Educational Beehive
Project in Aurora
Moved by Ping Zhang
Seconded by Robert Gaby
Page 27 of 114
Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee Meeting Minutes
June 3, 2026 5
1. That the Application from Dr. G.W. Williams Secondary School Grade
11 Students Erke Baitukenova and Sitara Sisavang; Re: Funding for
Educational Beehive Project in Aurora be received; and
2. That the Committee grant the funding request in the amount of $3,100.
Carried
7.9 Application from York Region Food Network; Re: Funding for Community
Meal Programs
Moved by Robert Gaby
Seconded by Ping Zhang
1. That the Application from York Region Food Network; Re: Funding for
Community Meal Programs be received; and
2. That the Committee grant the funding request in the amount of $5,000.
Carried
7.10 Application from Hope House Community Hospice; Re: Funding for Hope
House Memorial Picnic Bereavement Support Event
Moved by Robert Gaby
Seconded by Ping Zhang
1. That the Application from Hope House Community Hospice; Re:
Funding for Hope House Memorial Picnic Bereavement Support Event
be deferred to a future meeting when the applicant is present.
Carried
7.11 Application from York Region Children's Fund; Re: Funding for Stay in
School Awards Program 2026-2027
The Committee requested that the applicant provide an update to the
Committee at a later date on the number of Aurora youth assisted under
the program.
Moved by Ping Zhang
Seconded by Manuel Veloso
1. That the Application from York Region Children's Fund; Re: Funding for
Stay in School Awards Program 2026-2027 be received; and
Page 28 of 114
Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee Meeting Minutes
June 3, 2026 6
2. That the Committee grant the funding request in the amount of $5,000.
Carried
7.12 Application from Tracy Smith, OH YES WE CAN; Re: Funding for OH YES WE
CAN After Dark 2026 Initiative
Moved by Robert Gaby
Seconded by Manuel Veloso
1. That the Application from Tracy Smith, OH YES WE CAN; Re: Funding
for OH YES WE CAN After Dark 2026 Initiative be received; and
2. That the Committee grant the funding request in the amount of $3,000.
Carried
8. Informational Items
None.
9. New Business
The Committee set a tentative date for the next meeting of the Mayor's Golf
Classic Funds Committee as June 24, 2026 at 10 a.m. to consider the deferred
applications.
10. Adjournment
Moved by Manuel Veloso
Seconded by Ping Zhang
That the meeting be adjourned at 12:18 p.m.
Carried
Page 29 of 114
Town of Aurora
Heritage Advisory Committee
Meeting Minutes
Date:
Time:
Location:
Monday, June 8, 2026
7 p.m.
Holland Room, Aurora Town Hall
Committee Members: Councillor Wendy Gaertner (Chair)
Cynthia Bettio
Linda Duringer
John Green, Aurora Historical Society Rep. (Vice Chair)
Bob McRoberts, Honourary Member
Rocco Morsillo
Members Absent: Chris Polsinelli
Other Attendees: Councillor Ron Weese*
Adam Robb, Manager, Policy Planning and Heritage
Linda Bottos, Council/Committee Coordinator
*Attended electronically
_____________________________________________________________________
1. Call to Order
The Chair called the meeting to order at 7:15 p.m.
2. Land Acknowledgement
The Committee acknowledged that the meeting took place on Anishinaabe lands,
the traditional and treaty territory of the Chippewas of Georgina Island,
recognizing the many other Nations whose presence here continues to this day,
the special relationship the Chippewas have with the lands and waters of this
territory, and that Aurora has shared responsibility for the stewardship of these
lands and waters. It was noted that Aurora is part of the treaty lands of the
Mississaugas and Chippewas, recognized through Treaty #13 and the Williams
Treaties of 1923.
Page 30 of 114
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
June 8, 2026 2
3. Approval of the Agenda
Moved by Bob McRoberts
Seconded by Linda Duringer
That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved.
Carried
4. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
There were no declarations of pecuniary interest under the Municipal Conflict of
Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M.50.
5. Receipt of the Minutes
5.1 Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of April 13, 2026
Moved by Cynthia Bettio
Seconded by Linda Duringer
1. That the Heritage Advisory Committee meeting minutes of April 13,
2026, be received for information.
Carried
6. Delegations
None.
7. Matters for Consideration
7.1 Memorandum from Manager, Policy Planning and Heritage; Re: Heritage
Permit Application HPA-2026-03 - 72 Catherine Avenue
Staff provided an overview of the memorandum and proposed addition at
the rear second storey of the dwelling to increase the existing loft space
of the designated property at 72 Catherine Avenue, located within the
Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District.
The Committee and staff discussed various aspects including visibility
from the street, neighbourhood compatibility, and the proposed siding
material and colour, and staff provided further clarification. The
Page 31 of 114
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
June 8, 2026 3
Committee was generally supportive of the application with no concerns
about proceeding with delegated approval.
Moved by Bob McRoberts
Seconded by Cynthia Bettio
1. That the memorandum regarding Heritage Permit Application HPA-
2026-03 - 72 Catherine Avenue be received; and
2. That the Heritage Advisory Committee comments regarding Heritage
Permit Application HPA-2026-03 be received and referred to staff for
consideration and further action as appropriate.
Carried
7.2 Memorandum from Manager, Policy Planning and Heritage; Re: Heritage
Permit Application HPA-2026-04 - 20 Mark Street
Staff provided an overview of the memorandum and proposal to replace
the front-facing windows and door, and seal the two side yard windows of
the front enclosed verandah, of the designated property at 20 Mark Street,
located within the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District.
The Committee inquired about the proposed sealing of the side yard
windows and replacement of the front door, and staff provided further
clarification. The Committee was generally supportive of the application
with no concerns about proceeding with delegated approval.
Moved by Cynthia Bettio
Seconded by John Green
1. That the memorandum regarding Heritage Permit Application HPA-
2026-04 - 20 Mark Street be received; and
2. That the Heritage Advisory Committee comments regarding Heritage
Permit Application HPA-2026-04 be received and referred to staff for
consideration and further action as appropriate.
Carried
Page 32 of 114
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
June 8, 2026 4
7.3 Memorandum from Manager, Policy Planning and Heritage; Re: Custom
Street Signage for the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District
Staff provided an overview of the memorandum and design options for the
new custom street signage to be installed throughout the Northeast Old
Aurora Heritage Conservation District in commemoration of the 20th
anniversary of the District, which was established in 2006.
The Committee and staff reviewed and discussed the proposed design
options as well as other municipal examples and mockups provided by the
Committee. The Committee provided feedback regarding the preferred
non-reflective colour scheme; text content, layout and border; heritage-
style fonts; wrought-iron framing; and finial options. Staff agreed to
provide additional sign mockups based on the Committee’s input for
further review and feedback.
The Committee further suggested to include a mechanism whereby
residents and visitors could scan and learn about the District. Staff
advised this opportunity may be better integrated with the District gateway
signage being considered as part of the Town’s ongoing wayfinding
capital project. The Committee requested that the Town’s historical crest
be included in the gateway signage. Staff noted the gateway signage
details would be submitted to the Committee for review and comment as
the project progresses.
Moved by Linda Duringer
Seconded by Cynthia Bettio
1. That the memorandum regarding Custom Street Signage for the
Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District be received; and
2. That the Heritage Advisory Committee comments regarding Custom
Street Signage for the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation
District be received and referred to staff for consideration and further
action as appropriate.
Carried
Page 33 of 114
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
June 8, 2026 5
8. Informational Items
None.
9. New Business
The Chair expressed appreciation to Committee members for their support
regarding Victoria Hall at the recent Council meeting.
10. Adjournment
Moved by Bob McRoberts
Seconded by Cynthia Bettio
That the meeting be adjourned at 8:11 p.m.
Carried
Page 34 of 114
Town of Aurora
Accessibility Advisory Committee
Meeting Minutes
Date:
Time:
Location:
Wednesday, June 10, 2026
7 p.m.
Holland Room, Aurora Town Hall
Committee Members: Councillor Wendy Gaertner, Chair (arrived at 7:05 p.m.)
Lois Davies
Alison Hughes, Vice Chair
John Lenchak*
Jo-anne Spitzer
Marilyn Williams
Members Absent: Elaine Martini
Other Attendees: Gregory Peri, Accessibility Advisor
Julia Shipcott, Council/Committee Coordinator
_____________________________________________________________________
1. Call to Order
The Chair called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m.
2. Land Acknowledgement
The Committee acknowledged that the meeting took place on Anishinaabe lands,
the traditional and treaty territory of the Chippewas of Georgina Island,
recognizing the many other Nations whose presence here continues to this day,
the special relationship the Chippewas have with the lands and waters of this
territory, and that Aurora has shared responsibility for the stewardship of these
lands and waters. It was noted that Aurora is part of the treaty lands of the
Mississaugas and Chippewas, recognized through Treaty #13 and the Williams
Treaties of 1923.
Page 35 of 114
Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
June 10, 2026 2
3. Approval of the Agenda
Moved by Jo-anne Spitzer
Seconded by Alison Hughes
That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved.
Carried
4. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
There were no declarations of pecuniary interest under the Municipal Conflict of
Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M.50.
5. Receipt of the Minutes
5.1 Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of May 13, 2026
Moved by John Lenchak
Seconded by Jo-anne Spitzer
1. That the Accessibility Advisory Committee meeting minutes of May 13,
2026, be received for information.
Carried
6. Delegations
None.
7. Matters for Consideration
7.1 Memorandum from Accessibility Advisor; Re: Input for the next Multi-Year
Accessibility Plan (M.Y.A.P.)
Staff provided a brief update on projects currently ongoing, and outlined
the reasoning and processes behind adjusting the timing of Multi-Year
Accessibility Plans to coincide with Terms of Council.
The Committee provided suggestions on a wide range of accessibility
enhancement and improvement goals for staff to address in the upcoming
2027-2030 term.
Page 36 of 114
Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
June 10, 2026 3
Moved by Alison Hughes
Seconded by Marilyn Williams
1. That the memorandum regarding input for the next Multi-Year
Accessibility Plan (M.Y.A.P.) be received; and
2. That the Accessibility Advisory Committee comments regarding input
for the next Multi-Year Accessibility Plan (M.Y.A.P.) be received and
referred to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate.
Carried
7.2 Round Table Discussion; Re: Town of Aurora Multi-Year Accessibility Plan
2022 to 2026
Staff noted the remaining dates for committee meetings this year, and
reminded the Committee of the Ministry for Seniors and Accessibility's
virtual Accessibility Advisory Committee Forum occurring on June 11,
2026. Additionally, staff reported successful results on the various
programs offered by the Town of Aurora during National AccessAbility
Week, as well as the Accessibility Advisory Committee Professional
Development Forum held at the York Region Administrative Centre last
week.
Moved by Alison Hughes
Seconded by John Lenchak
1. That the Accessibility Advisory Committee comments regarding the
Town of Aurora Multi-Year Accessibility Plan 2022 to 2026 be received
and referred to staff for consideration and action as appropriate.
Carried
8. Informational Items
The Chair noted that committee member John Lenchak has been part of
Accessibility Advisory Committees since 2003 and offered congratulations and
thanks on his commitment and work.
Page 37 of 114
Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
June 10, 2026 4
9. New Business
The Committee provided an update on the following items, with more details to
come:
'No Tricks, Just Treats' will return to the Aurora Farmers' Market on
Saturday, October 31, 2026.
A 'Sensitive Santa' event will be offered at the Town Square in November
to provide a free low-sensory interaction with Santa.
The Chair inquired on how the number of barrier-free parking spots may alter due
to proposed renovations of Victoria Hall, and staff provided a response.
10. Adjournment
Moved by Alison Hughes
Seconded by Lois Davies
That the meeting be adjourned at 8:11 p.m.
Carried
Page 38 of 114
Town of Aurora
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Meeting Minutes
Date:
Time:
Location:
Thursday, June 18, 2026
7 p.m.
Holland Room, Aurora Town Hall
Committee Members: Councillor John Gallo (Chair)
Councillor Ron Weese (Vice Chair)
Nikki Alber
Megan Bamford*
Judy Collins*
Lenard Lind
William Newton, York Regional Police Representative*
Laura Schaffer
Ian Smith
Other Attendees: James Gagnon, Bylaw Enforcement/Licensing Officer
Andrew Poray, Manager, Economic Development*
Patricia De Sario, Director, Corporate Services/Town Solicitor
Daniel Ruberto, Deputy Town Clerk
Linda Bottos, Council/Committee Coordinator
*Attended electronically
_____________________________________________________________________
1. Call to Order
The Chair called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
2. Land Acknowledgement
The Committee acknowledged that the meeting took place on Anishinaabe lands,
the traditional and treaty territory of the Chippewas of Georgina Island,
recognizing the many other Nations whose presence here continues to this day,
the special relationship the Chippewas have with the lands and waters of this
territory, and that Aurora has shared responsibility for the stewardship of these
Page 39 of 114
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes
June 18, 2026 2
lands and waters. It was noted that Aurora is part of the treaty lands of the
Mississaugas and Chippewas, recognized through Treaty #13 and the Williams
Treaties of 1923.
3. Approval of the Agenda
Moved by Councillor Ron Weese
Seconded by Nikki Alber
That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved.
Carried
4. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
There were no declarations of pecuniary interest under the Municipal Conflict of
Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M.50.
5. Receipt of the Minutes
5.1 Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes of April 16, 2026
Moved by Nikki Alber
Seconded by Laura Schaffer
1. That the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force meeting minutes of April
16, 2026, be received for information.
Carried
6. Delegations
None.
7. Matters for Consideration
7.1 Round Table Discussion; Re: Follow-up to Review of Cannabis Retail Stores
The Chair provided a findings framework to facilitate the discussion and
reviewed the proposed key findings learned from the Task Force review of
data from Town staff, including By-law Services, York Regional Police
(YRP), Council reports, provincial regulations, and feedback from residents
Page 40 of 114
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes
June 18, 2026 3
and business owners. The proposed findings included: (1) Cannabis retail
stores have generally not created significant Town-wide public safety or
enforcement concerns; (2) Some neighbouring residents and businesses
continue to experience impacts that may not be fully reflected in formal
complaint statistics; (3) The primary concerns identified relate to location,
clustering, compatibility and nuisance impacts rather than cannabis retail
operations themselves; (4) Aurora identified many of these concerns prior
to legalization and retail implementation; and (5) Municipal authority
remains limited.
The Chair advised that a motion would be proposed at the June 23, 2026
Council meeting to direct staff to conduct a survey of residents and
businesses located within a specified distance of licensed cannabis retail
stores and provide the results to the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
prior to its final meeting in August 2026.
The Task Force and staff discussed various matters including: focus of
the survey; by-law and enforcement limitations; complaint reporting,
possible gaps in call data capture and lack of education on the complaint
process; response timing; YRP data, call priorities and services; the
suggested need for a complaint-driven monitoring system with a defined
response trigger point; the assignment of resources where they would be
most effective; and the oversight responsibilities of the Alcohol and
Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO).
The Task Force inquired about the potential use of funding received from
the Province, as detailed in the May 16, 2023 staff report no. PDS23-062 –
Retail Cannabis Update 2023, and staff agreed to report back on any
expenditure details.
The Task Force further inquired about whether the Town had received any
responses to its earlier communications to AGCO, and staff provided an
update. There was further discussion on learning the experiences and best
practices of other GTA municipalities that have opted in, and the possible
submission of a joint communication to AGCO. Staff agreed to follow up.
The Task Force was generally supportive of the proposed findings and
following recommendations.
Local recommendations:
Page 41 of 114
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes
June 18, 2026 4
Improved public awareness of reporting channels
Targeted enforcement where warranted
Enhanced communication between operators, property owners, and
neighbours
Periodic monitoring and reporting
Provincial recommendations: That Council advocate to the Province and
AGCO to:
Implement Aurora’s 2019 recommendations respecting separation
distances
Permit municipalities to establish separation distances between stores
Permit municipalities to establish setbacks from sensitive land uses
Provide municipalities with greater authority over clustering and
location decisions
Moved by Councillor Ron Weese
Seconded by Nikki Alber
1. That the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force comments regarding
Follow-up to Review of Cannabis Retail Stores be received and referred
to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate.
Carried
8. Informational Items
None.
9. New Business
None.
10. Adjournment
Moved by Nikki Alber
Seconded by Lenard Lind
That the meeting be adjourned at 7:43 p.m.
Carried
Page 42 of 114
Town of Aurora
Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee
Meeting Minutes
Date:
Time:
Location:
Wednesday, June 24, 2026
10 a.m.
Video Conference
Committee Members: Angela Covert, Chair
Manuel Veloso, Vice Chair
Ping Zhang
Members Absent: Elliott Elia
Robert Gaby
Other Attendees: Jason Gaertner, Manager, Financial Management
Daniel Ruberto, Deputy Town Clerk
Julia Shipcott, Council/Committee Coordinator
_____________________________________________________________________
1. Call to Order
The Chair called the meeting to order at 10:03 a.m.
2. Land Acknowledgement
The Committee acknowledged that the meeting took place on Anishinaabe lands,
the traditional and treaty territory of the Chippewas of Georgina Island,
recognizing the many other Nations whose presence here continues to this day,
the special relationship the Chippewas have with the lands and waters of this
territory, and that Aurora has shared responsibility for the stewardship of these
lands and waters. It was noted that Aurora is part of the treaty lands of the
Mississaugas and Chippewas, recognized through Treaty #13 and the Williams
Treaties of 1923.
Page 43 of 114
Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee Meeting Minutes
June 24, 2026 2
3. Approval of the Agenda
Moved by Manuel Veloso
Seconded by Ping Zhang
That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved.
Carried
4. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
There were no declarations of pecuniary interest under the Municipal Conflict of
Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M.50.
5. Receipt of the Minutes
5.1 Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee Meeting Minutes of June 3, 2026
Moved by Ping Zhang
Seconded by Manuel Veloso
1. That the Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee meeting minutes of
June 3, 2026, be received for information.
Carried
6. Delegations
None.
7. Matters for Consideration
7.1 Application from Voices of Joy; Re: Funding for Ongoing Choir Operations
and Expenses
Moved by Manuel Veloso
Seconded by Ping Zhang
1. That the Application from Voices of Joy; Re: Funding for Ongoing Choir
Operations and Expenses be received; and
2. That the Committee grant the funding request in the amount of $5,000.
Carried
Page 44 of 114
Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee Meeting Minutes
June 24, 2026 3
7.2 Application from Hope House Community Hospice; Re: Funding for Hope
House Memorial Picnic Bereavement Support Event
Moved by Manuel Veloso
Seconded by Ping Zhang
1. That the Application from Hope House Community Hospice; Re:
Funding for Hope House Memorial Picnic Bereavement Support Event
be received; and
2. That the Committee grant the funding request in the amount of $3,000.
Carried
7.3 Application from Hockey Ends Hunger; Re: Funding for Charity Hockey
Game Operations and Expenses
Moved by Ping Zhang
Seconded by Manuel Veloso
1. That the Application from Hockey Ends Hunger; Re: Funding for Charity
Hockey Game Operations and Expenses be received; and
2. That the Committee grant the funding request in the amount of $4,000.
Carried
8. Informational Items
None.
9. New Business
The Committee discussed reapplying to the Committee for the new term of
Council.
10. Adjournment
Moved by Ping Zhang
Seconded by Manuel Veloso
That the meeting be adjourned at 10:38 a.m.
Carried
Page 45 of 114
Town of Aurora
Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee
Meeting Minutes
Date:
Time:
Location:
Wednesday, August 5, 2026
10 a.m.
Video Conference
Committee Members: Angela Covert, Chair
Manuel Veloso, Vice Chair
Ping Zhang
Members Absent: Elliott Elia
Robert Gaby
Other Attendees: Jason Gaertner, Manager, Financial Management
Daniel Ruberto, Deputy Town Clerk
Julia Shipcott, Council/Committee Coordinator
_____________________________________________________________________
1. Call to Order
The Chair called the meeting to order at 10:02 a.m.
2. Land Acknowledgement
The Committee acknowledged that the meeting took place on Anishinaabe lands,
the traditional and treaty territory of the Chippewas of Georgina Island,
recognizing the many other Nations whose presence here continues to this day,
the special relationship the Chippewas have with the lands and waters of this
territory, and that Aurora has shared responsibility for the stewardship of these
lands and waters. It was noted that Aurora is part of the treaty lands of the
Mississaugas and Chippewas, recognized through Treaty #13 and the Williams
Treaties of 1923.
Page 46 of 114
Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee Meeting Minutes
August 5, 2026 2
3. Approval of the Agenda
Moved by Manuel Veloso
Seconded by Ping Zhang
That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved.
Carried
4. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
There were no declarations of pecuniary interest under the Municipal Conflict of
Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M.50.
5. Receipt of the Minutes
5.1 Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee Meeting Minutes of June 24, 2026
Moved by Ping Zhang
Seconded by Manuel Veloso
1. That the Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee meeting minutes of
June 24, 2026, be received for information.
Carried
6. Delegations
None.
7. Matters for Consideration
7.1 Application from Learning Disabilities Association of York-Simcoe; Re:
Funding to Support Children with LDs or ADHD to Attend Camp
Moved by Ping Zhang
Seconded by Manuel Veloso
1. That the Application from Learning Disabilities Association of York-
Simcoe; Re: Funding to Support Children with LDs or ADHD to Attend
Camp be received; and
2. That the Committee grant the funding request in the amount of $5,000.
Carried
Page 47 of 114
Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee Meeting Minutes
August 5, 2026 3
7.2 Application from the National Federation of Literati and Artists of Canada;
Re: Funding for Ongoing Program Events, Guest Speakers and Materials
Moved by Manuel Veloso
Seconded by Ping Zhang
1. That the Application from the National Federation of Literati and
Artists of Canada; Re: Funding for Ongoing Program Events, Guest
Speakers and Materials be received; and
2. That the Committee grant the funding request in the amount of $5,000.
Carried
7.3 Application from Minds in Motion STEM; Re: Funding for Materials, Prizes
and Refreshments for the STEM Robotics Challenge
Moved by Ping Zhang
Seconded by Manuel Veloso
1. That the Application from Minds in Motion STEM; Re: Funding for
Materials, Prizes and Refreshments for the STEM Robotics Challenge
be received; and
2. That the Committee deny the funding request due to the funding
request referencing a past event.
Carried
7.4 Application from Porchlight Arts; Re: Funding for Marketing of the 'Lights
On' Community Art and Music Festival
Moved by Manuel Veloso
Seconded by Ping Zhang
1. That the Application from Porchlight Arts; Re: Funding for Marketing of
the 'Lights On' Community Art and Music Festival be received; and
2. That the Committee grant the funding request in the amount of $1,000.
Carried
8. Informational Items
Page 48 of 114
Mayor's Golf Classic Funds Committee Meeting Minutes
August 5, 2026 4
None.
9. New Business
The Deputy Clerk advised committee members on the application process for the
upcoming Term of Council.
10. Adjournment
Moved by Ping Zhang
Seconded by Manuel Veloso
That the meeting be adjourned at 11:06 a.m.
Carried
Page 49 of 114
Town of Aurora
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Meeting Minutes
Date:
Time:
Location:
Thursday, August 27, 2026
7 p.m.
Holland Room, Aurora Town Hall
Committee Members: Councillor John Gallo
Councillor Ron Weese
Nikki Alber
Megan Bamford*
Lenard Lind
William Newton, York Regional Police Representative*
Laura Schaffer
Ian Smith
Members Absent: Judy Collins
Other Attendees: James Gagnon, Bylaw Enforcement/Licensing Officer
Andrew Poray, Manager, Economic Development*
Carley Smith, Manager, Corporate Communications
Patricia De Sario, Director, Corporate Services/Town Solicitor
Daniel Ruberto, Deputy Town Clerk
Linda Bottos, Council/Committee Coordinator
*Attended electronically
_____________________________________________________________________
1. Call to Order
The Chair called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
2. Land Acknowledgement
The Committee acknowledged that the meeting took place on Anishinaabe lands,
the traditional and treaty territory of the Chippewas of Georgina Island,
recognizing the many other Nations whose presence here continues to this day,
Page 50 of 114
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes
August 27, 2026 2
the special relationship the Chippewas have with the lands and waters of this
territory, and that Aurora has shared responsibility for the stewardship of these
lands and waters. It was noted that Aurora is part of the treaty lands of the
Mississaugas and Chippewas, recognized through Treaty #13 and the Williams
Treaties of 1923.
3. Approval of the Agenda
Moved by Councillor Ron Weese
Seconded by Nikki Alber
That the revised agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved.
Carried
4. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
There were no declarations of pecuniary interest under the Municipal Conflict of
Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M.50.
5. Receipt of the Minutes
5.1 Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes of June 18, 2026
Moved by Councillor Ron Weese
Seconded by Laura Schaffer
1. That the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force meeting minutes of June
18, 2026, be received for information.
Carried
6. Delegations
None.
7. Matters for Consideration
7.1 Memorandum from Manager, Corporate Communications; Re: Retail
Cannabis Stores in Aurora Survey Feedback
The Task Force expressed appreciation for the survey and feedback.
Page 51 of 114
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes
August 27, 2026 3
Moved by Nikki Alber
Seconded by Councillor Ron Weese
1. That the memorandum regarding Retail Cannabis Stores in Aurora
Survey Feedback be received; and
2. That the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force comments regarding
Retail Cannabis Stores in Aurora Survey Feedback be received and
referred to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate.
Carried
7.2 Round Table Discussion: Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Final Findings
and Recommendations
The Chair provided an overview of the Task Force final findings and
recommendations to be reported back to Council. Staff outlined the staff
report that would be submitted to Council on September 8, 2026, including
the Task Force final report and recommendations.
The Task Force and staff discussed various aspects including the need
for public education on how to report observed criminality; public safety
concerns and continued monitoring; the need for communications with
the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO); retail
responsibilities; possible preventive measures; and the cannabis retail
location approval and dispute process.
The Task Force was generally supportive of the final findings and
recommendations report as presented by the Chair.
Moved by Councillor Ron Weese
Seconded by Nikki Alber
1. That the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Final Findings and
Recommendations be received; and
2. That the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force comments regarding the
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Final Findings and
Recommendations be received and referred to staff for consideration
and further action as appropriate.
Carried
Page 52 of 114
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes
August 27, 2026 4
8. Informational Items
None.
9. New Business
None.
10. Adjournment
Moved by Councillor Ron Weese
Seconded by Laura Schaffer
That the meeting be adjourned at 7:33 p.m.
Carried
Page 53 of 114
100 John West Way
Aurora, Ontario
L4G 6J1
(905) 727-3123
aurora.ca
Town of Aurora
Committee of the Whole Report
No. CS2 6 -0 19
Subject: Dust By-law
Prepared by: Alexander Wray, Manager Bylaw Services
Department: Corporate Services
Date: September 8, 2026
Recommendation
1. That Report No. CS26-019 be received; and
2. That a by-law to regulate dust be brought forward to a future Council meeting for
enactment; and
3. That a by-law to amend the penalty amounts in the Administrative Monetary Penalty
System By-law be brought forward to a future Council meeting.
Executive Summary
At its October 28, 2025, meeting, Council directed staff to undertake a public awareness
campaign regarding silica dust and review options for dust mitigation. Following a
review of the Town’s Clean Communities By-law, applicable legislation, and municipal
best practices, staff concluded that a standalone Dust By-law is the clearest and most
enforceable approach.
The Municipal Act, 2001 provides municipalities with the clear authority to
regulate dust.
The existing Clean Communities By-law is not intended to regulate residential
construction dust.
A standalone Dust By-law provides a clear and enforceable regulatory
framework.
The proposed Dust By-law reflects municipal best practices.
The Town has undertaken public education respecting dust and will continue to
promote awareness.
Page 54 of 114
September 8, 2026 2 of 7 Report No. CS26-019
Background
Respirable dust generated through residential construction activities, including the
cutting of concrete, stone, masonry products and similar building materials, has
become an increasing source of concern for Aurora residents. While construction
activity is a necessary component of maintaining and improving residential properties,
uncontrolled dust may negatively impact neighbouring properties and, depending on the
material being disturbed, may present health concerns for workers and nearby
residents.
Recognizing these concerns, Council adopted a member motion on October 28, 2025,
directing staff to undertake a public awareness campaign regarding silica dust and
review the Town’s regulatory framework for dust mitigation.
In response, staff reviewed the Town’s Clean Communities By-law, applicable
legislation, and regulatory approaches adopted by comparable municipalities to
determine the most appropriate method of regulating residential construction dust.
Through this review, staff concluded that a standalone Dust By-law would provide a
clearer, more comprehensive, and more enforceable framework than incorporating
additional provisions into the existing Clean Communities By-law. The proposed by-law
establishes requirements and dust mitigation measures for residential construction
activities where dust may affect neighbouring properties, while recognizing reasonable
construction activities through practical exemptions and enforcement provisions
consistent with the Town’s existing regulatory framework.
Analysis
The Municipal Act, 2001 provides municipalities with the clear authority to regulate dust.
The Municipal Act, 2001 (the “Act”) provides municipalities with broad authority to pass
by-laws respecting health, safety and well-being of persons, environmental well-being,
and matters constituting public nuisances. More specifically, Section 129 of the Act
expressly authorizes municipalities to prohibit and regulate dust.
Unlike many nuisance matters that rely on broader municipal authority, dust has been
specifically contemplated within provincial legislation, providing municipalities with
clear legislative authority to establish local standards respecting dust mitigation and
enforcement.
Page 55 of 114
September 8, 2026 3 of 7 Report No. CS26-019
The proposed Dust By-law has been prepared under the authority provided by the Act
while remaining complementary to other applicable legislation governing construction
activities.
The existing Clean Communities By-law is not intended to regulate residential
construction dust.
As directed by Council, staff completed a review of the Town’s existing Clean
Communities By-law to determine whether amendments could adequately address
concerns relating to residential construction dust.
While the Clean Communities By-law addresses a variety of nuisance conditions
affecting public spaces and private property, it was not designed to regulate
construction practices or establish technical standards relating to dust suppression
during residential construction activities.
Unlike litter, waste accumulation, or property maintenance concerns, effective dust
regulations require clear definitions respecting construction activities, prescribed
mitigation techniques, practical exemptions, enforcement authorities, inspection
powers, remedial action provisions, and offence provisions specifically tailored to
construction-related activities.
Incorporating these provisions within the existing Clean Communities By-law would
significantly expand its scope and introduce subject matter beyond the original intent of
the by-law.
Accordingly, staff are of the opinion that residential construction dust is more
appropriately regulated through a standalone by-law.
A standalone Dust By-law provides a clear and enforceable regulatory framework.
The proposed Dust By-law has been drafted to regulate situations where dust generated
through residential construction activities escapes beyond the property on which the
work is being undertaken.
Rather than prohibiting certain types of construction activities, the proposed by-law
recognizes that residential construction is a normal and necessary activity while
requiring reasonable measures to minimize off-site dust mitigation.
The proposed by-law identifies several acceptable dust mitigation techniques, including
wet cutting, wetting construction materials, dustless saw technologies, vacuum
Page 56 of 114
September 8, 2026 4 of 7 Report No. CS26-019
attachments, tarping, wind fencing, and other comparable dust suppression methods
appropriate to the activities being undertaken. Property owners and contractors remain
free to determine which mitigation measures are appropriate and reasonable to prevent
dust from escaping onto neighbouring properties.
The proposed by-law also includes practical exemptions for municipal infrastructure
work, commercial and industrial properties, larger residential developments subject to
development agreements entered into pursuant to the Planning Act, multi-residential
developments, and residential demolition projects conducted under approved
demolition permits. These exemptions recognize that such activities are typically
regulated through separate legislative and contractual frameworks.
To support the effective administration, the proposed by-law incorporates inspection
powers, compliance orders, remedial action provisions, and enforcement mechanisms
consistent with other regulatory by-laws administered by the Town.
The proposed Dust By-law reflects established municipal best practices.
Staff have reviewed regulatory approaches adopted by comparable municipalities
throughout Ontario.
The City of Toronto implemented a standalone residential construction dust by-law in
2018 which requires reasonable dust suppression measures during residential
construction activities. Similarly, the Town of Whitby adopted a Residential Construction
Dust By-law establishing comparable prohibitions, prescribed mitigation measures,
exemptions, and enforcement provisions.
Staff also reviewed approaches utilized by municipalities including Oshawa, Markham,
Vaughan, Richmond Hill, Oakville, Burlington, Hamilton, and London. While many
municipalities address dust through broader nuisance, property standards, or
construction management regulations, relatively few have adopted standalone
residential dust by-laws.
The proposed by-law closely aligns with established practices adopted by the Town of
Whitby and City of Toronto while incorporating administrative and enforcement
provisions consistent with the Town’s existing legislative standards.
Overall, staff are satisfied that the proposed by-law reflects current municipal best
practices and provides an appropriate level of regulation for residential construction
activities within Aurora.
Page 57 of 114
September 8, 2026 5 of 7 Report No. CS26-019
The Town has undertaken public education respecting dust and will continue to promote
awareness.
As directed through Council’s member motion, staff developed and implemented a
public education initiative to raise awareness regarding the concerns associated with
construction dust and promote best practices for dust mitigation during residential
construction activities. Educational information was shared through the Town’s
communication channels and highlighted practical measures that residents and
contractors can take to reduce airborne dust and protect neighbouring properties.
Staff recognize that public education remains an important component of promoting
voluntary compliance and encouraging safe construction practices. While the initial
awareness campaign has been completed, the Town will continue to provide
educational information where appropriate through existing communication channels,
including the Town’s website, permit application processes, and other opportunities as
they arise.
The proposed Dust By-law complements these ongoing education efforts by
establishing clear regulatory expectations while encouraging proactive dust mitigation
through awareness and outreach.
Advisory Committee Review
Not applicable.
Legal Considerations
The Town has authority under the Municipal Act, 2001 to regulate dust within the
municipality. In accordance with sections 8 and 11 of the Act, municipalities are granted
broad authority to govern municipal affairs and to pass by-laws respecting the health,
safety and well-being of persons and the environmental well-being of the municipality.
Additionally, section 128 authorizes municipalities to prohibit and regulate matters that
may become or cause public nuisances, while section 129 specifically authorizes
municipalities to prohibit and regulate dust. These provisions provide statutory authority
for the proposed Dust By-law and its associated enforcement measures.
The proposed by-law is intended to complement existing legislative and regulatory
frameworks governing construction activities, while providing clear standards,
Page 58 of 114
September 8, 2026 6 of 7 Report No. CS26-019
compliance measures, and enforcement mechanisms to address dust impacts
associated with residential construction activities.
The by-law will be subject to the Town’s standard enforcement mechanisms, including
inspections, orders and prosecutions where appropriate. In addition, corresponding
administrative penalties will be established through amendments to the Town’s
Administrative Monetary Penalty System (AMPS) By-law, allowing designated dust-
related offences to be addressed through the Town’s existing AMPS framework.
Financial Implications
There are no direct financial implications as a result of this report.
Communications Considerations
Communications developed and implemented a public education initiative to raise
awareness regarding the concerns associated with construction dust and promoted
best practices for dust mitigation during residential construction activities in
Spring/Summer of this year. Educational information was shared through the Town’s
social media channels and featured on the Town’s website at aurora.ca/DustMatters.
Climate Change Considerations
Not applicable.
Link to Strategic Plan
The Implications of Implementing a Dust By-law report supports the Strategic Plan goal
of Strengthening the fabric of our community through its accomplishment in satisfying
requirements in the following objectives within this goal statement.
Examine the impact of increased growth and demographic diversity on municipal service
delivery. Through the review of trends, statistics, and benchmarking against other
municipalities, while also understanding the impacts on implementing a Dust By-law in
Aurora.
Alternative(s) to the Recommendation
1. That Report No. CS26-019 be received for information only.
Page 59 of 114
September 8, 2026 7 of 7 Report No. CS26-019
Conclusions
Following Council’s direction, staff completed a review of the Town’s existing Clean
Communities By-law, applicable provincial legislation, and municipal best practices
respecting residential construction dust.
Based on this review, staff have concluded that a standalone Dust By-law provides a
clearer, more comprehensive and enforceable regulatory framework than expanding the
existing Clean Communities By-law.
The proposed by-law establishes reasonable expectations for residential construction
activities while recognizing practical construction methods through prescribed dust
mitigation measures and appropriate exemptions. The proposed framework aligns with
legislative authority under the Municipal Act, 2001 and reflects regulatory approaches
adopted by comparable Ontario municipalities.
Attachments
Attachment #1 – Draft Dust By-law
Previous Reports
None.
Pre-submission Review
Agenda Management Team review on August 20, 2026
Approvals
Approved by Patricia De Sario, Director, Corporate Services/Town Solicitor
Approved by Doug Nadorozny, Chief Administrative Officer
Page 60 of 114
CS26-019-Attachment 1
Page 61 of 114
Page 62 of 114
Page 63 of 114
Page 64 of 114
Page 65 of 114
Page 66 of 114
Page 67 of 114
100 John West Way
Aurora, Ontario
L4G 6J1
(905) 727-3123
aurora.ca
Town of Aurora
Committee of the Whole Report
No. CS26 -020
Subject: Fence By-law Variance Request – 10 Northern Dancer Lane
Prepared by: Alexander Wray, Manager of Bylaw Services
Department: Corporate Services
Date: September 8, 2026
Recommendation
1. That Report No. CS26-020 be received; and
2. That a variance to Fence By-law No. 6429-22 to permit the construction of a non-
compliant fence in the front yard of 10 Northern Dancer Lane be denied.
Executive Summary
The purpose of this report is to consider a request from the property owner of 10
Northern Dancer Lane to construct a front fence in the form of a masonry wall with
railings ranging in height from 1.53 to 2.29 metres. The permitted height in the Town’s
Fence and Pool Enclosure By-law No. 6429-22 (the “By-law”) is 1.2 metres. The
proposed fence is intended to serve as an added security and privacy feature. In
addition, the proposed masonry wall does not comply with the By-law’s open fence
construction requirements for front yard fences. If approved, the fence will exceed the
permitted height of a front yard fence by 0.33 to 1.09 metres.
A precedent for fence variances has already been set within the Adena Meadows
community.
Historical data indicates that the Town has received six formal requests for a
fence variance or exemption in the past.
The applicant has received support from the Condominium Corporation for the
Fence variance.
Page 68 of 114
September 8, 2026 2 of 5 Report No. CS26-020
Background
The subject property is a single detached home situated within the York Region Vacant
Land Condominium Corporation 1010 (YRVLCC) in the Wellington Street East and Leslie
Street neighbourhood of Ward 4. The dwelling is situated in a gated community with
carded and security access and is located on a dead-end private roadway with
approximately eight other homes on the street.
The Fence and Pool Enclosure By-law No. 6429-22, being a By-law to regulate and
prescribe the standards for fences and pool enclosures (the “By-law”), permits the
height of 1.2 metres for a fence in a front yard of a residential neighbourhood. The By-
law further stipulates that front yard fences shall be constructed using Open-Fence
Construction. The Proposed fence will measure a maximum height of 2.29 metres and
will not be entirely constructed of Open-Fence Construction.
The Property owner has proactively contacted Bylaw Services to seek approval for the
proposed fence. As part of their application, the property owner has submitted letters of
support from adjacent property owners and the condominium board. Bylaw Services
has provided notice to all abutting property owners advising them of the variance
request and how they can delegate to Council.
Analysis
A precedent for fence variances has already been set within the Adena Meadows
community.
Fencing is a common solution to address privacy, security, and aesthetics. A precedent
within the Adena Meadows community has already been established at 18 Sirona’s
Lane for a similar variance request. By permitting the variance, both current and future
decisions may be viewed as subjective and will diminish the integrity of the Town’s By-
law.
Historical data indicates that the town has received six formal requests for a fence
variance or exemption in the past.
Available historical data indicates that the Town has received six formal fence variance
requests. The history of these requests and subsequent Council decisions are
illustrated in the below chart. It should be noted that the approved variance for 15516
Leslie Street has since been removed as the lands have been redeveloped.
Page 69 of 114
September 8, 2026 3 of 5 Report No. CS26-020
Year of
Request
Report
Number
Property
Address
Reason for
Variance
Request
Council
Decision
1. 2004 BA04-16 15516 Leslie
Street
Dust and
Noise
mitigation
Approved
2. 2019 CS19-011 203 St.
John’s
Sideroad
West
Privacy Denied
3. 2021 CS21-059 32 Knowles
Crescent
Privacy Denied
4 2024 CS24-021 241 Holladay
Drive
Privacy Approved
5. 2025 CS25-008 39 Hackwood
Crescent
Privacy Approved
6. 2025 CS25-022 18 Sirona’s
Lane
Privacy and
Security
Approved
The applicant has received support from the Condominium Corporation for the Fence
variance.
The location of the proposed fence variance is within a gated community that forms
part of a condominium corporation. For the safety and security of the condominium
residents, the neighbourhood has controlled access points with swing arms/gates and
staffed gate houses. As part of the applicant’s application for a fence variance to
enhance their property security, they have submitted letters of support from the
property management company and some adjacent properties.
Advisory Committee Review
Not applicable.
Page 70 of 114
September 8, 2026 4 of 5 Report No. CS26-020
Legal Considerations
In accordance with Section 9 of the By-law, where a proposed fence does not comply
with the By-law, the owner may request a variance from any of the applicable provisions
of the By-law, including height. Council is the approval authority for all variance
requests. Any decision of Council is deemed to be final without any further right of
appeal.
If Council approves the variance request, any variance granted is effective and valid
until such time as the fence to which the variance applies is substantially replaced or
removed entirely, unless otherwise specified by Council as part of its decision.
Financial Implications
There are no financial implications to the Town as a result of this report.
Communications Considerations
There are no communications considerations as a result of this report.
Climate Change Considerations
The items for consideration in this report do not impact climate change.
Link to Strategic Plan
Not Applicable.
Alternative(s) to the Recommendation
1. The applicant’s request for a fence variance at 10 Northern Dancer Lane be
approved, until such time that the fence requires replacement.
Conclusions
Staff recommend the provisions of the By-law be upheld and the variance request
refused.
Page 71 of 114
September 8, 2026 5 of 5 Report No. CS26-020
Attachments
Attachment 1 – Aerial Photographs of Neighbourhood
Attachment 2 – Fence Variance Design Drawings
Previous Reports
Not applicable.
Pre-submission Review
Agenda Management Team review on August 20, 2026
Approvals
Approved by Patricia De Sario, Director, Corporate Services/Town Solicitor
Approved by Doug Nadorozny, Chief Administrative Officer
Page 72 of 114
CS26-020-Attachment 1
Page 73 of 114
FENCE 'L'FENCE 'A'FENCE 'J'FENCE 'K'FENCE 'K'FENCE 'J'FENCE 'H'FENCE 'I'COMPLIES W/ BY-LAWCOMPLIES W/ BY-LAWCOMPLIES W/ BY-LAWNON- COMPLIANTFENCE HEIGHT MAX. = 1.98MPIER HEIGHT MAX. = 2.29MNON- COMPLIANTFENCE HEIGHT MAX. = 1.98MPIER HEIGHT MAX. = 2.29MNON- COMPLIANTFENCE HEIGHT MAX. = 2.03MPIER HEIGHT MAX. = 2.29MNON- COMPLIANTFENCE HEIGHT MAX. = 2.03MPIER HEIGHT MAX. = 2.29MNON- COMPLIANTFENCE HEIGHT MAX. = 1.80MPIER HEIGHT MAX. = 2.16M1 OF 1CS26-020-Attachment 2Page 74 of 114
100 John West Way
Aurora, Ontario
L4G 6J1
(905) 727-3123
aurora.ca
Town of Aurora
Committee of the Whole Report
No. CS26 -021
Subject: By-law Requirements for Hedges
Prepared by: Alexander Wray, Manager of Bylaw Services
Department: Corporate Services
Date: September 8, 2026
Recommendation
1. That Report No.CS26-021 be received for information.
Executive Summary
The Town of Aurora regulates vegetative hedges through complementary provisions
contained within the Fence and Pool Enclosure By-law No. 6429.22 and Property
Standards By-law No. 6543-23. The Fence and Pool Enclosure By-law establishes
maximum heights for hedges, shrubs, and other vegetation that act as a fence in several
circumstances, while the Property Standards By-law provides additional standards
respecting heavy overgrowth of vegetation.
Staff have reviewed the existing regulatory framework in response to Council’s direction
concerning circumstances where the Fence and Pool Enclosure By-law do not prescribe
a maximum height for vegetative hedges and have outlined the findings in the body of
this report.
The Fence and Pool Enclosure By-law currently regulate vegetative hedge heights
in several circumstances.
The Property Standards By-law provides an additional mechanism to address
heavy overgrowth of vegetation.
The Town’s regulatory approach balances neighbourhood character with
appropriate regulation of vegetative hedges.
Page 75 of 114
September 8, 2026 2 of 7 Report No. CS26-021
Aurora’s recently modernized by-laws provide complementary mechanisms for
regulating vegetative hedges and property maintenance.
Background
At its Committee of the Whole meeting on April 14, 2026, staff was asked to provide
information at a future meeting of Council on the lack of height limitations on vegetative
hedges within the Town’s Fence and Pool Enclosure By-law No. 6429-22.
The By-law was enacted in June 2022 as part of the modernization of the Town’s
regulatory framework for fences and pool enclosures. The By-law defines a “Fence” to
include any hedge or shrub that has the same effect as a barrier or structure that
screens from view, encloses or divides a yard or other land, or substantially marks the
boundary between adjoining properties.
Schedule “A” of the by-law establishes maximum fence heights based on location,
property type, and other site-specific circumstances. Vegetation acting as a fence is
subject to prescribed maximum heights in several circumstances; however, the
Schedule also identifies circumstances where no maximum height applies.
The Town subsequently modernized its Property Standards By-law in 2023 through the
enactment of By-law No. 6543-23, replacing the previous Property Standards By-law.
The Property Standards By-law establishes minimum standards for the maintenance
and occupancy of properties throughout Aurora and includes requirements for yards
and vacant properties to be kept free of heavy overgrowth of vegetation.
Analysis
The Fence and Pool Enclosure By-law currently regulate vegetative heights in several
circumstances.
The Town’s Fence and Pool Enclosure By-law No. 6429-22 was enacted in 2022 and
introduced a more comprehensive regulatory framework for fences and pool
enclosures. Unlike the former Fence By-law, the current By-law expressly defines a
“Fence” to include a hedge or shrub where it functions as a barrier that screens from
view, encloses or divides a yard or other land, or substantially marks the boundary
between adjoining properties.
As a result, vegetative hedges that meet the definition of a fence are subject to a
number of the requirements contained within the By-law. Schedule “A” of the by-law
Page 76 of 114
September 8, 2026 3 of 7 Report No. CS26-021
establishes maximum heights for hedges, shrubs, and other vegetation acting as a
fence based on their location and surrounding circumstances. For example, vegetation
acting as a fence in a typical front yard is limited to 1.2 metres. Different limits apply to
Estate Residential and Rural properties and to vegetation located outside of a front yard
but in proximity to a public highway or abutting certain land uses.
The existing by-law does not, however, prescribe a maximum height for vegetative
hedges in every circumstance. Schedule “A” of the by-law expressly provides “No
Maximum Height’ for vegetation acting as a fence in certain circumstances, including
under the general provision applicable to fences that do not fall within another
specifically identified category. Accordingly, the current regulatory framework does not
represent an absence of regulation for vegetative hedges; rather, it applies height
restrictions in specified locations and circumstances while permitting flexibility
elsewhere.
The By-law also contains provisions intended to protect visibility where fences are in
proximity to driveways and parking lots. In these locations, fences must generally
provide an unobstructed view of pedestrian and vehicle traffic, and vegetation cannot
be permitted to grow in a manner that obstructs the required view through the fence.
These provisions provide an additional mechanism to address vegetation where its
location may create sightline issues.
The Property Standards By-law provides an additional mechanism to address heavy
overgrowth of vegetation.
The Town’s Property Standards By-law No. 6543-23 establishes minimum standards for
the maintenance and occupancy of properties throughout Town and operates alongside
the Fence and Pool Enclosure By-law. The Property Standards By-law was enacted in
2023, replacing the Town’s previous Property Standards By-law from 1999.
Section 6 of the Property Standards By-law establishes maintenance requirements for
yards and vacant properties. These areas must be maintained free from rubbish or
debris and conditions that create or mat create health, fire, accident, or safety hazards.
More specifically, Section 6.3 requires yards and vacant properties to be kept free from
dead or decayed trees, damaged trees that create an unsafe condition, and heavy
overgrowth of vegetation, except on properties zoned for agricultural purposes.
This provision is complementary to the regulation of vegetative hedges under the Fence
and Pool Enclosure By-law. While the Fence and Pool Enclosure By-law regulates the
height and location of vegetation where it functions as a fence in prescribed
Page 77 of 114
September 8, 2026 4 of 7 Report No. CS26-021
circumstances, the Property Standards By-law addresses the maintenance and
conditions of the vegetation on private property.
The Town’s regulatory approach balances neighbourhood character with appropriate
regulation of vegetative hedges.
Aurora contains established neighbourhoods where mature trees, hedges and
landscaping contribute to the character and privacy of individual properties and
surrounding streetscape. The regulatory history of vegetative hedges is relevant when
considering these existing conditions.
The Town’s former Fence By-law No. 4753-05.P was enacted in 2005 and defined a
fence as a structure situated on private property. The definition did not expressly
include hedges, shrubs, or other vegetation. Although the former by-law established
maximum heights for constructed fences based on property type, location and adjacent
land use, those provisions operated within that definition of a fence.
With the modernization of the Fence and Pool Enclosure By-law in 2022, the definition
was expanded to include hedges and shrubs where they have the same effect as a
fence. Consequently, mature vegetative hedges may exist within established areas of
the Town that pre-date the current regulatory framework applicable to vegetation acting
as a fence.
Establishing a universal maximum height for all vegetative hedges could therefore have
implications for existing mature landscaping, including hedges that are well maintained
and contribute positively to privacy and neighbourhood character but do not otherwise
present a property maintenance or sightline concern. Unlike a constructed fence,
vegetation is also a living landscape feature whose height alone does not necessarily
indicate that it is poorly maintained or problematic.
The existing framework provides a balanced approach by regulating vegetative hedge
heights where their location or surrounding circumstances warrant a specific restriction,
while allowing greater flexibility in other locations. Where vegetation becomes heavily
overgrown or creates conditions addressed through the Town’s other regulatory
standards, the Property Standards By-law provides an additional mechanism to address
those conditions.
Page 78 of 114
September 8, 2026 5 of 7 Report No. CS26-021
Aurora’s recently modernized by-law provides complementary mechanisms for regulating
vegetative hedges and property maintenance.
Both of the principal by-laws applicable to this review have been recently modernized.
The Fence and Pool Enclosure By-law was enacted in 2022 and introduced the express
inclusion of hedges and shrubs within the definition of a fence. The Property Standards
By-law followed in 2023 and replaced the Town’s previous property standards
legislation from 1999.
The two by-laws serve distinct but complementary regulatory purposes. The Fence and
Pool Enclosure By-law establishes requirements respecting the location, height,
construction, and maintenance of fences, including vegetation that functions as a
fence. The Property Standards by-law establishes broader standards respecting the
maintenance and condition of properties, including requirements addressing unsafe
trees and heavy overgrowth of vegetation.
The Fence and Pool Enclosure By-law itself recognizes that its provisions are intended
to operate together with other Town by-laws and provides that where another applicable
law establishes a higher standard, the higher standard applies. Similarly, the Property
Standards By-law provides that where the property standards provisions conflict with
another Town by-law, the provision establishing the highest standard for the overall
protection of public health, safety, and welfare applies.
When considered together, these provisions establish a regulatory framework that
distinguishes between height, location, safety, and property maintenance
considerations, rather than relying exclusively on a single maximum height for all
vegetative hedges. The existing framework permits mature and appropriately
maintained vegetation in circumstances where a specific height restriction is not
necessary, while retaining regulatory mechanisms to address vegetation where its
location, condition, or degree of overgrowth gives rise to concerns addressed by the
Town’s By-laws.
Advisory Committee Review
Not applicable.
Legal Considerations
The Town has authority under the Municipal Act, 2001 to regulate fences and under the
Building Code Act, 1992 to establish property-maintenance standards. The Fence and
Page 79 of 114
September 8, 2026 6 of 7 Report No. CS26-021
Pool Enclosure By-law expressly includes hedges and shrubs that function as fences
and regulates applicable height, location and sightline requirements. The Property
Standards By-law separately addresses unsafe vegetation, maintenance concerns and
heavy overgrowth.
Together, the existing by-laws provide appropriate and complementary mechanisms to
address municipal safety and property-maintenance concerns without imposing a
general maximum height on all hedges. Enforcement is based on the specific
circumstances and the applicable by-law provisions. Neighbour disputes involving
boundaries, encroachment, nuisance or property damage remain private civil matters.
Financial Implications
There are no financial implications as a result of this report.
Communications Considerations
There are no communication considerations as a result of this report.
Climate Change Considerations
The recommendations from this report does not impact greenhouse gas emissions or
impact climate change adaptation.
Link to Strategic Plan
The Implications of this Information Report on Fence By-law Requirements for Hedges
supports the Strategic Plan goal of Supporting an exceptional quality of life for all
through its accomplishment in satisfying requirements in the following objectives within
this goal statement.
Promote the adaptability and flexibility of services to respond to demographic shifts.
Through ensuring that the Town’s Fence and Property Standards By-laws meet the
needs of the Town’s unique neighbourhoods and small-town charm.
Alternative(s) to the Recommendation
1. None.
Page 80 of 114
September 8, 2026 7 of 7 Report No. CS26-021
Conclusions
The Town’s existing regulatory framework provides a balanced approach to the
regulation of vegetative hedges. The Fence and Pool Enclosure By-law establishes
height restrictions for vegetation acting as a fence in specified circumstances, while the
Property Standards By-law provides an additional mechanism to address heavy
overgrowth of vegetation.
Together, these recently modernized by-laws provide appropriate regulatory
mechanisms while recognizing that mature and well-maintained vegetation can
contribute to privacy and the character of our community.
Attachments
None.
Previous Reports
None.
Pre-submission Review
Agenda Management Team review on August 20, 2026
Approvals
Approved by Patricia De Sario, Director, Corporate Services/Town Solicitor
Approved by Doug Nadorozny, Chief Administrative Officer
Page 81 of 114
100 John West Way
Aurora, Ontario
L4G 6J1
(905) 727-3123
aurora.ca
Town of Aurora
Committee of the Whole Report
No. CS2 6 -0 22
Subject: Cannabis Retail Review Task Force – Findings and
Recommendations
Prepared by: Patricia De Sario, Director of Corporate Services/Town Solicitor
Department: Corporate Services
Date: September 8, 2026
Recommendation
1. That Report No. CS26-022 be received; and
2. That the Local Actions set out in the Recommendations section of the final report of
the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force be implemented; and
3. That the final report of the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force be circulated to York
Regional Police, the Premier of Ontario, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing,
the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO), Local Members of Provincial
Parliament, the Association of Municipalities (AMO) and all municipalities in Ontario
for consideration and support.
Executive Summary
On October 28, 2025, Council approved a motion to establish a Cannabis Retail Review
Task Force. The motion required the Task Force to report back to Council with findings
and recommendations. Attached to this report is the Task Force’s report.
The Cannabis Retail Review Task Force was established on February 19, 2026.
The Task Force met regularly between February and August 2026 to review
information related to cannabis retail operations in Aurora, hear from Town staff,
discuss community feedback, and consider experiences in other jurisdictions.
A survey was conducted to obtain feedback from Aurora residents and
businesses regarding retail cannabis stores and their impact on the community.
Page 82 of 114
September 8, 2026 2 of 5 Report No. CS26-022
The Task Force’s mandate includes providing recommendations to Council on
potential actions or advocacy initiatives to address identified challenges and
support balanced community outcome.
Background
The Cannabis Retail Review Task Force was established on February 19, 2026.
On October 28, 2025, Council approved a motion to establish a Cannabis Retail Review
Task Force.
The purpose of the Task Force was to review the Town's experience since opting in to
the Province's retail cannabis framework and to assess the impacts of cannabis retail
stores within the community. The motion directed that the Task Force examine issues
including public safety, land use, business clustering, signage, community perception,
and economic development, while also reviewing best practices from other
municipalities and identifying potential advocacy opportunities. The Task Force was
further directed to provide recommendations to Council within six months of its first
meeting, which timeline was later extended to this meeting in September.
Council subsequently approved the Terms of Reference for the Cannabis Retail Review
Task Force and appointed a membership consisting of members of Council, resident
representatives, Town staff and a representative from York Regional Police.
The Task Force met regularly between February and August 2026 to review information
related to cannabis retail operations in Aurora, hear from Town staff, discuss community
feedback, and consider experiences in other jurisdictions.
During its review, the Task Force examined the current provincial regulatory framework
governing retail cannabis sales, the Town's limited authority respecting the location and
density of cannabis retail stores, and potential opportunities for municipal advocacy
and community education.
A survey was conducted to obtain feedback from Aurora residents and businesses
regarding retail cannabis stores and their impact on the community.
The Cannabis Retail Review Survey was open from July 14 to August 9, 2026 and
promoted across a range of the Town’s communications channels, including social
media, the Town website, the Noticeboard, digital signage at recreation centres, the
Page 83 of 114
September 8, 2026 3 of 5 Report No. CS26-022
Aurora Matters e-newsletter, and the Engage Aurora e-newsletter. The survey site
received 479 visitors and 154 survey completions.
Overall, the survey suggested that the primary concern among respondents is less
about the existence of legal cannabis retail and more about the perceived number,
concentration and location of stores within Aurora, together with associated concerns
regarding youth exposure and neighbourhood impacts. The results also demonstrate
that a segment of respondents supports cannabis retail and views the businesses as
legitimate, regulated retail operations.
Analysis
The Task Force’s mandate includes providing recommendations to Council on potential
actions or advocacy initiatives to address identified challenges and support balanced
community outcome.
In accordance with the motion passed by Council, the Task Force was established to
review the experience of the Town of Aurora since opting in to retail cannabis stores;
identified issues that have arisen related to public safety, land use, business clustering,
signage, community perception, and economic development; and explored best
practices from other municipalities regarding cannabis retail management and
community engagement, where available.
The Task Force has completed its review and has provided recommendations in the
attached report for Council's consideration.
Advisory Committee Review
See attached.
Legal Considerations
Private cannabis retail stores are licensed and regulated by the Alcohol and Gaming
Commission of Ontario under the Cannabis Licence Act, 2018 and Ontario Regulation
468/18. Having opted into the provincial framework, the Town cannot now prohibit
cannabis retail stores or establish a municipal licensing system for the sale of cannabis.
The Town does not have the authority to license private cannabis retail stores or
prohibit them as a land use. However, private cannabis retail stores are required to
Page 84 of 114
September 8, 2026 4 of 5 Report No. CS26-022
comply with the Town’s zoning by-law and the Official Plan in regard to zones and
standards that apply to all retail stores. As such, private cannabis retail stores may be
located wherever retail uses are permitted and must comply with setbacks, and other
standards. Further, the Building Code and Fire Code may apply if permits are required
and where these codes do apply, the appropriate inspections would be required.
Financial Implications
None.
Communications Considerations
This report and the recommendations from the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force will
be posted on the Town’s website.
Climate Change Considerations
The findings and recommendations set out in the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Report do not impact greenhouse gas emissions or impact climate change adaptation .
Link to Strategic Plan
The findings and recommendations set out in the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Report support the Strategic Plan goal of Community: Supporting an exceptional quality
of life for all and Economy: Enabling a diverse, creative and resilient economy.
Alternative(s) to the Recommendation
1. Council provide direction.
Conclusions
The Cannabis Retail Review Task Force was established on February 19, 2026. The
Task Force met regularly between February and August 2026 to review information
related to cannabis retail operations in Aurora, hear from Town staff, discuss
community feedback, and consider experiences in other jurisdictions. A survey was
conducted to obtain feedback from Aurora residents and businesses regarding retail
cannabis stores and their impact on the community. The Task Force’s mandate
Page 85 of 114
September 8, 2026 5 of 5 Report No. CS26-022
includes providing recommendations to Council on potential actions or advocacy
initiatives to address identified challenges and support balanced community outcome.
The recommendations are attached to this report for Council’s consideration.
Attachments
Attachment 1 – Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Report
Previous Reports
CS19-001, Proposed Private Cannabis Retail Stores in Aurora, January 21, 2019
CS19-004, Proposed Private Cannabis Retail Stores in Aurora – Additional Information,
January 21, 2019
PDS23-062, Retail Cannabis Update 2023, May 16, 2023
Pre-submission Review
Agenda Management Team review on August 20, 2026
Approvals
Approved by Doug Nadorozny, Chief Administrative Officer
Page 86 of 114
Attachment 1 to Report No. CS26-022
Page 1 of 9
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Final Findings and Recommendations
August 27, 2026
1. Purpose
The Cannabis Retail Review Task Force was established by Council to review the Town
of Aurora's experience since opting in to Ontario's retail cannabis framework and to
report back to Council with findings and recommendations.
The Task Force reviewed the provincial regulatory framework, previous Council
decisions and reports, information from Town staff and York Regional Police,
enforcement and complaint information, community concerns, the experience of
neighbouring residents and businesses, and feedback received through the 2026
Cannabis Retail Review Survey.
The Task Force recognizes that legal cannabis retailers are legitimate businesses
operating within a provincially regulated framework. The purpose of this review is not to
reconsider the legalization of cannabis or Aurora's decision to opt in, but to determine
what has been learned from Aurora's experience and identify opportunities to better
address community impacts.
2. Background
Aurora Council opted in to permit private cannabis retail stores on January 21, 2019.
At the same time, Council recognized potential concerns regarding the location and
concentration of cannabis retail stores and requested that the Alcohol and Gaming
Commission of Ontario consider additional location restrictions.
Specifically, Council requested:
• A minimum 150-metre separation between cannabis retail stores; and
• A minimum 150-metre separation between cannabis retail stores and specified
sensitive uses, including daycares, nurseries, parks, group homes, addiction and
Page 87 of 114
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Final Findings and Recommendations August 27, 2026
Page 2 of 9
counselling facilities, recreation facilities, the Aurora Public Library, Town Hall
and similar public gathering uses.
Despite Council's request, these additional criteria were not adopted by the AGCO.
The Province currently requires a 150-metre separation from schools and private
schools. Municipalities do not have authority to license private cannabis retailers or
regulate cannabis retail as a separate land use. Cannabis stores are otherwise subject
to the same applicable municipal zoning requirements as other permitted retail uses.
The Town's 2023 Retail Cannabis Update subsequently confirmed that the number or
proximity of cannabis stores is not an objectionable criterion under the provincial
framework and that municipalities have no control over their locations beyond the
zoning requirements applicable to retail uses generally.
3. Community Survey
Council authorized a Cannabis Retail Review Survey to provide the Task Force with
current community feedback.
The survey was conducted from July 14 to August 9, 2026 and was promoted through
Town communication channels.
The survey received:
• 479 visits; and
• 154 completed responses.
The survey should be considered an important source of community feedback rather
than a statistically representative referendum of all Aurora residents.
Overall, the survey indicates that the principal concern among respondents is not simply
the existence of legal cannabis retail stores. Concerns are more strongly associated
with:
• The number of cannabis retail stores;
• Concentration and clustering;
• Store locations;
• Proximity to sensitive uses;
Page 88 of 114
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Final Findings and Recommendations August 27, 2026
Page 3 of 9
• Youth exposure; and
• Neighbourhood impacts.
The Task Force also recognizes that a segment of respondents supports cannabis retail
and considers these businesses legitimate and appropriately regulated retail
operations.
These results generally reinforce the location and concentration concerns identified by
Aurora Council when it opted in to cannabis retail in 2019.
4. Task Force Findings
Finding 1: Cannabis retail has not created a significant
town-wide enforcement problem
The available information does not demonstrate widespread public safety, crime or
municipal enforcement problems associated with cannabis retail stores across Aurora.
Town staff have historically reported relatively few complaints associated with legal
cannabis retailers, and proactive By-law inspections conducted in March 2026 did not
identify violations.
The Task Force therefore does not find evidence supporting a conclusion that cannabis
retail stores, as a class of business, represent a significant town-wide enforcement
problem.
Finding 2: Town-wide statistics do not necessarily reflect
localized impacts
While aggregate complaint and enforcement numbers are relatively low, the Task Force
heard concerns regarding impacts experienced by residents and businesses
neighbouring certain cannabis retail locations.
Issues identified during the Task Force's work included:
• Litter and discarded cannabis packaging;
Page 89 of 114
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Final Findings and Recommendations August 27, 2026
Page 4 of 9
• Parking;
• Signage;
• Patron behaviour;
• Loitering or prolonged gathering;
• Neighbourhood compatibility; and
• Other nuisance and quality-of-life concerns.
The Task Force finds that a relatively small number of locations can generate
significant impacts for immediate neighbours without producing large town-wide
complaint statistics.
Accordingly, aggregate complaint data should not be the sole measure used to
determine whether a localized problem exists.
Finding 3: Location and concentration are central
concerns
The Task Force finds that one of the most consistent concerns is the location and
concentration of cannabis retail stores rather than the existence of legal cannabis retail
itself.
This finding is reinforced by the 2026 community survey, which identified the perceived
number, concentration and location of stores as primary concerns.
The existing provincial framework provides Aurora with little ability to address these
concerns.
Finding 4: Aurora anticipated these concerns in 2019
The Task Force finds it significant that Aurora Council identified location and
concentration as potential concerns before cannabis retail stores began operating in
the Town.
Council's 2019 request for:
• 150-metre separation between cannabis retail stores; and
• 150-metre separation from specified sensitive uses
Page 90 of 114
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Final Findings and Recommendations August 27, 2026
Page 5 of 9
was intended to provide reasonable safeguards while allowing legal cannabis retail
businesses to operate in Aurora.
Seven years of experience and the results of the 2026 review demonstrate that many of
the concerns identified by Council in 2019 remain relevant.
Finding 5: The provincial framework significantly limits
municipal control
The Task Force finds that there is a significant gap between municipal responsibility for
responding to community concerns and municipal authority to prevent or address the
underlying location issues.
Aurora can enforce generally applicable municipal bylaws, including parking, signage
and property-related regulations.
However, Aurora cannot:
• License cannabis retail stores;
• Regulate cannabis retail as a separate land use;
• Establish cannabis-specific zoning;
• Establish mandatory separation distances between cannabis stores; or
• Establish additional cannabis-specific setbacks from sensitive uses.
The ultimate authority respecting retail cannabis authorizations rests with the Province
through the AGCO.
Finding 6: Localized problems require targeted responses
Given the relatively low level of town-wide complaints but more significant concerns
associated with particular locations, the Task Force finds that targeted intervention is
preferable to blanket enforcement.
Where persistent problems are identified, the Town should coordinate available
resources and work with retailers, property owners, neighbouring businesses, residents,
By-law Services, YRP and the AGCO, as appropriate, to address the specific
circumstances.
Page 91 of 114
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Final Findings and Recommendations August 27, 2026
Page 6 of 9
Finding 7: Residents need clearer information about where
and how to report concerns
Responsibility for cannabis-related concerns is divided among several organizations.
Depending upon the issue, residents may need to contact:
• Town of Aurora By-law Services;
• York Regional Police;
• The AGCO;
• York Region; or
• A property owner or business operator.
The Task Force finds that clearer public information would improve reporting, allow
concerns to be directed to the appropriate authority and improve the quality of
information available for future monitoring.
5. Recommendations
The Cannabis Retail Review Task Force recommends that Council endorse the following
actions.
A. Local Actions
1. Improve public information and reporting
That the Town develop clear public information identifying where residents and
businesses should report cannabis retail concerns, including the respective
responsibilities of the Town, AGCO, York Regional Police and other appropriate
agencies.
2. Establish a targeted response approach
That where recurring concerns are identified around a cannabis retail location,
appropriate Town departments coordinate a targeted response using existing municipal
Page 92 of 114
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Final Findings and Recommendations August 27, 2026
Page 7 of 9
enforcement authorities and engage the retailer, property owner, neighbouring residents
and businesses, YRP and AGCO where appropriate.
3. Encourage retailer and property-owner engagement
That the Town encourage cannabis retailers and property owners to proactively address
legitimate neighbourhood concerns, including litter, parking, property maintenance and
patron behaviour occurring on their properties.
4. Continue monitoring
That the Town periodically monitor cannabis retail-related complaints and enforcement
activity to identify emerging trends or recurring locations of concern and report
significant developments to Council as appropriate.
B. Provincial Advocacy
5. Reaffirm Aurora's 2019 position
That Council reaffirm its January 21, 2019 position respecting cannabis retail store
locations and advocate to the Province of Ontario and the AGCO for implementation of
those principles.
Specifically, Aurora should continue to advocate for authority to establish:
• A minimum 150-metre separation between cannabis retail stores; and
• A minimum 150-metre separation between cannabis retail stores and appropriate
sensitive uses, including daycares, nurseries, parks, group homes, addiction and
counselling facilities, recreation facilities, libraries and other appropriate public
gathering places.
6. Provide municipalities greater authority over location and clustering
That Council request that the Province amend the cannabis retail regulatory framework
to provide municipalities with meaningful authority to address the location, density and
clustering of cannabis retail stores within their communities.
Page 93 of 114
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Final Findings and Recommendations August 27, 2026
Page 8 of 9
Any expanded municipal authority should allow municipalities to develop locally
appropriate standards while maintaining reasonable opportunities for legal cannabis
retailers to operate.
7. Strengthen municipal input into AGCO decisions
That Council request that the Province strengthen the municipal role in the AGCO retail
store authorization process, including requiring meaningful consideration of municipal
concerns regarding location, concentration, sensitive uses and documented community
impacts.
8. Review operating conditions where neighbourhood impacts exist
That the Province and AGCO be requested to examine whether additional regulatory
tools are appropriate where a cannabis retail operation generates repeated,
documented impacts on neighbouring residential or commercial properties, including
whether operating conditions or hours may be considered where warranted.
9. Coordinate advocacy with other Ontario municipalities
That Aurora's final Task Force report and Council resolution be forwarded to:
• The Premier of Ontario;
• The appropriate Provincial Ministers;
• The AGCO;
• The Association of Municipalities of Ontario;
• York Region;
• All Ontario municipalities,
with a request for support for greater municipal authority over cannabis retail location
and clustering.
6. Conclusion
Aurora's experience with legal cannabis retail is nuanced.
The Task Force did not find evidence that cannabis retailers generally represent a
significant town-wide public safety or enforcement problem. Legal cannabis retailers
Page 94 of 114
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Final Findings and Recommendations August 27, 2026
Page 9 of 9
are regulated businesses that contribute to Aurora's economy and should be treated
fairly.
At the same time, the review demonstrates that legitimate localized impacts can occur
and that the current provincial framework leaves municipalities with limited tools to
address one of the community's principal concerns: where cannabis stores locate and
how closely they may be concentrated.
Importantly, Aurora anticipated these issues in 2019.
When Council opted in to cannabis retail, it supported reasonable separation distances
between stores and from sensitive uses. Those recommendations were not
incorporated into the provincial framework. The concerns identified through the Task
Force's work and the 2026 community survey demonstrate that those principles remain
relevant today.
The Task Force therefore recommends a balanced approach.
Locally, Aurora should improve reporting, monitoring, communication and targeted
responses where problems occur.
Provincially, Aurora should renew and strengthen its advocacy for the principles Council
established in 2019 and request meaningful municipal authority over cannabis retail
location, concentration and neighbourhood compatibility.
This approach recognizes cannabis retailers as legitimate businesses while also
recognizing the responsibility of municipal government to protect the quality of life of
residents and neighbouring businesses.
Councillor John Gallo
Town of Aurora
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Chair
Page 95 of 114
100 John West Way
Aurora, Ontario
L4G 6J1
(905) 727-3123
aurora.ca
Town of Aurora
Committee of the Whole Report
No. OPS 2 6 -0 17
Subject: Summer Storm Update – A Road to Recovery
Prepared by: Matthew Volpintesta, Manager of Parks and Fleet
Department: Operational Services
Date: September 8, 2026
Recommendation
1. That Report No. OPS26-017 be received for information.
Executive Summary
This report provides information to Council regarding a severe storm event that
occurred on July 3, 3026, resulting in significant damage to the Town of Aurora’s (the
Town's) urban forest, affecting hundreds of trees on residential and private properties,
municipal boulevards, parks and trails. Damage to private and public property was
significant caused by broken branches and major tree limbs to complete tree failure and
uprooting.
Aurora is not unfamiliar with severe weather events as they have impacted
the urban forest increasingly over the last 28 years.
Response to localized microburst in northwest Aurora was swift ensuring
immediate safety concerns impacting public prioritized by staff, first
responders and contractors.
The Lakeview/Willow Farm Trail system and adjacent woodlots was most
heavily impacted.
Road to full recovery is extensive and will take several years to fully re-
establish the loss within the urban canopy.
Page 96 of 114
September 8, 2026 2 of 8 Report No. OPS26-017
Many Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) treated Ash trees failed during the storm
representing 52 per cent of the total street tree population lost in the July
weather event.
Background
Aurora is not unfamiliar with severe weather events as they have impacted the urban
forest increasingly over the last 28 years.
The central and southern areas of Ontario, including Aurora, have been more severely
impacted by significant weather events in the last three decades. In 1998, a late May
storm impacted 200 or more trees across Aurora, causing damage to homes and
infrastructure. A winter ice storm, just before Christmas in 2013, resulted in more than
500 trees being damaged, requiring pruning or removal and months of clean-up by staff.
Another storm in May 2022, later confirmed as a Derecho, devastated the old part of
Aurora uprooting and downing a record number of mature historical trees, many over
100 years old.
The storm on July 3, 2026, at approximately 2:45 pm was a brief, but intense, storm cell
impacting residential properties, private institutional properties, and most significantly,
Town-owned boulevards and parkland. Aurora’s urban forest was severely impacted
with hundreds of trees sustaining major damage. Damage to power infrastructure and
public utility was also significant.
Analysis
Response to localized microburst in northwest Aurora was swift ensuring immediate
safety concerns impacting public prioritized by staff, first responders and contractors.
Within minutes of the storm damage, staff quickly mobilized to assess the situation and
organize staff, contractors and equipment, prioritizing with first responders to ensure
safe passable roads, and ensuring immediate hazards were mitigated and emergency
vehicles could easily access the affected areas.
As the hours passed it became clear the storm had impacted hundreds of trees within a
very localized area both on public and private lands; however, the full extent would not
be known for days. Damage ranged from broken tree limbs to complete tree failure with
significant sized trees entirely uprooted. The Town’s communication teams were quick
to provide essential information through co-ordinated update on storm and response
efforts.
Page 97 of 114
September 8, 2026 3 of 8 Report No. OPS26-017
Within the first seven days, ISA certified Town arboricultural staff completed initial
assessments of all residential frontages with Town-owned trees, documented damage,
and prioritized response activities, including those requiring specialized forestry
equipment (e.g. cranes used to remove large trees from rear yards fallen from adjacent
Town properties). Staff across departments coordinated over 200 service requests,
responded to resident questions and managed insurance-related matters. The GIS
Division created live mapping, used to support tracking and operational planning
throughout the response.
Recovery efforts during the first couple of weeks were complicated by the widespread
impact to both municipal and private trees, requiring coordination between Town crews,
contractors, and property owners. Adding to the complexity of the response were the
numerous private arborists and insurance contractors working to remove the non-
municipal trees that had fallen on private property, making for a somewhat chaotic
scene. The Town also welcomed support from municipal colleagues from Town of East
Gwillimbury and City of Richmond Hill, who provided additional support, helping staff
manage the volume of work during the first week following the storm.
The Lakeview/Willow Farm trail system and adjacent woodlots was most heavily
impacted.
Although the immediate hazards and street trees along residential streets were
addressed quickly and prioritized, the impact and extent of damage to the urban forest
was not fully understood until the trails, woodlots and parks could be assessed.
During the last week of July, staff began a full inspection of the trail systems and
woodlots, including fencelines, delineating Town land from private. The damage was
immense requiring a co-ordinated approach between private property owners, the
Town’s forestry contractor with specialized equipment such as a crane, and skid steer
with grapple claws, As of the first week of August, the majority of the trails were
restored to a safe condition for public use; however, a portion of the Lakeview/Willow
Farm trail adjacent to St. Andrews College (SAC) remains closed as tree and fenceline
works continue through August and into September. It is estimated that several hundred
trees fell between the two properties resulting in what looks like scattered matchsticks
over the delineating fenceline spanning approximately 215 metres in length of fence.
The Town is fortunate to have a strong historical partnership with SAC and have been
working collectively to co-ordinate cleanup prior to school starting in September.
Page 98 of 114
September 8, 2026 4 of 8 Report No. OPS26-017
Road to full recovery is extensive and will take several years to fully re-establish the loss
within the urban canopy.
The Town received 236 resident reports related to storm damage. Approximately 107
municipal trees along public boulevards were completely lost and will require replacing,
while many others required level 1 or 2 tree risk assessments to determine whether they
could be safely retained through pruning.
Staff estimate approximately 1,000 plus trees, ranging in size were lost within parks,
trails and woodlots. It was not only Town lands that suffered canopy loss, but many
residential properties were also significantly impacted with some losing more than half
of the trees on private property, and others losing almost all trees. Due to the size of the
lots within the impact zone of the storm, a couple of these residential properties lost
upwards of 30 trees. Staff estimate over 100 trees on private residential lands failed or
were uprooted requiring removal.
Through information gathered and analyzed via staff assessments, it is estimated that
over 1,200 trees were lost from the urban forest canopy. While this is only 0.13 per cent
of the total Aurora canopy cover of 864, 900 trees, based on the 2023 Urban Foresty
Strategy, the small geographic area in which the loss occurred had a devastating impact
to the street scape, character and composition of the neighbourhoods and surrounding
parkland.
Additional tree removals are continuing within parklands and trail systems adjacent to
private properties. Priority will remain on mitigating risk and restoring residential street
trees with stump grinding occurring this coming fall and spring in advance of the 2027
planting season. Staff will also work on developing re-planting plans for parks, trails,
and other greenspaces; exploring partnership and grant opportunities to support
restoration efforts including opportunities to engage community and school groups in
the reforestation efforts. The parkland re-planting efforts will begin in 2028. The reality
is that restoring Aurora's urban forest in the northwest quadrant of Town will take time,
and that work will continue for the months and years ahead.
Many Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) treated Ash trees failed during the storm representing 52
per cent of the total street tree population lost in the July weather event.
Severe weather can significantly increase the risk posed by EAB infested ash trees. As
EAB larvae feed beneath the bark, they disrupt the tree’s ability to transport water and
nutrients, causing structural weakness, canopy dieback, and eventual mortality. During
high winds, ice storms, heavy snow, or saturated soil conditions, these weakened trees
Page 99 of 114
September 8, 2026 5 of 8 Report No. OPS26-017
are more likely to experience limb failure, trunk breakage, or complete uprooting. Dead
and declining ash trees can deteriorate rapidly, creating hazards to people, vehicles,
buildings, utilities, and transportation corridors.
While the Town opted to treat EAB as part of the mitigation strategy to control the
insect within the urban canopy, this July storm illustrates that the Ash trees are feeling
the long-term effects of the invasive species. Staff estimate that approximately 56 Ash
trees were completely compromised requiring removal. This equates to 3 per cent of
the remaining population of Ash trees within the street tree inventory.
As such, staff elected to pause the EAB injection treatments for the remainder of 2026
until a fulsome review of the program is completed. Staff will provide Council a report in
early 2027, that will review treatment efficacy, health evaluation over the long-term,
financials and viability of continuing to treat ash trees as part of the urban forest.
Advisory Committee Review
Not applicable.
Legal Considerations
The July 2026 storm event resulted in significant damage to Town-owned trees and
other municipal assets, requiring emergency response, hazard mitigation, and extensive
clean-up activities. Staff continue to address outstanding public safety concerns,
coordinate remediation efforts, and document response activities.
As with any significant weather event, the Town has received, and may continue to
receive, claims alleging property damage or personal injury associated with Town-
owned trees, infrastructure, and other municipal assets. Any such claims will be
evaluated and managed in accordance with established procedures, applicable legal
principles, and the Town's insurance program.
Financial Implications
The storm’s full financial impact will be significant. A summary of the Town’s total
estimated costs as a result of the storm are summarized under Table 1.
Page 100 of 114
September 8, 2026 6 of 8 Report No. OPS26-017
Table 1
Summary of Estimated Storm Costs
Services and Goods Estimated Costs
Emergency Tree Contractor $ 250,500
Forestry Rental Equipment $ 13,800
Stump Grinding $ 20,330
Replanting of Street Trees $ 53,600
*Estimated Total $ 338,230
*estimated costs do no include staff salaries or overtime.
The Town has been unsuccessful in identifying any emergency grant funding in support
of these costs; however, staff continue to investigate alternative funding options such
as re-planting programs/community engagement, and forest plots.
Communications Considerations
Following the storm, the Town issued 14 social media updates between July 3 and July
22, with additional information posted on the Town’s website. Communications
provided ongoing updates on storm impacts, safety concerns, park and trail closures,
and cleanup efforts, including advising residents to avoid fallen trees, debris, damaged
trees, overhead hazards and downed power lines.
Residents were also provided guidance on private-property tree debris, including
curbside yard waste collection, waste depot disposal and private removal. Updates
highlighted cleanup progress, tree removals and anticipated timelines for remaining
park and trail work. The Town also communicated plans to restore Aurora’s tree canopy
through stump removal, replacement street trees beginning in 2027, and replanting in
parks and trails through Town initiatives and community partnerships.
Page 101 of 114
September 8, 2026 7 of 8 Report No. OPS26-017
The Town will continue to provide updates on cleanup progress, park and trail
conditions, and tree replacement and restoration efforts as new information becomes
available.
Climate Change Considerations
Climate change is contributing to more frequent and intense storm events, which can
cause significant damage to trees through broken limbs, structural failure, and
uprooting. These impacts can reduce canopy cover, increase maintenance and removal
costs, and diminish the environmental benefits trees provide, including shade, air quality
improvement, stormwater management, and carbon sequestration. Building a resilient
urban forest through proactive tree management and species diversity is an important
strategy for adapting to the effects of climate change.
Link to Strategic Plan
The Summer Storm update supports the Strategic Plan Goal of Supporting
Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability for all through its accomplishment in
satisfying requirements in the following key objectives within this goal statement:
Encouraging the stewardship of Aurora’s natural resources: Advance and improve
policies to ensure the protection of the Town’s urban tree canopy.
Alternative(s) to the Recommendation
None.
Conclusions
Storms test both a community and an organization. What's clear is that the Town of
Aurora was tested once again and our dedicated, professional staff was successful in
assisting the community to restore properties, streets, parks, trails and services for
residents. We are incredibly proud of the works to date and the continuing efforts to
restore the loss to our urban canopy.
Aurora’s urban forest is a significant natural asset in which the Town has the
responsibility to nurture and manage. The Town understands the importance of urban
forest management and over the years has been a leader in the Region by introducing a
full forestry inventory, enacting a Tree Protection By-law, creating Urban Forest Policies,
Page 102 of 114
September 8, 2026 8 of 8 Report No. OPS26-017
Landscape Standards for development, Woodlot Management and an Urban Forestry
Strategy. This important living asset is constantly under threat due to climatic changes,
invasive species and harsh surrounding urban environments; therefore, it is vital for the
Town continue to focus on ongoing protection and conservation efforts, expansion of
canopy cover and proactive tree management though adequate funding, planning and
staffing to ensure a resilient, healthy urban forest for generations of future residents.
Attachments
None.
Previous Reports
None.
Pre-submission Review
Agenda Management Team review on August 20, 2026
Approvals
Approved by Sara Tienkamp, Director, Operational Services
Approved by Doug Nadorozny, Chief Administrative Officer
Page 103 of 114
100 John West Way
Aurora, Ontario
L4G 6J1
(905) 727-3123
aurora.ca
Town of Aurora
Member Motion
Councillor Gaertner
Re: Use of the Council Conference Budget
To: Mayor and Members of Council
From: Councillor Wendy Gaertner
Date: September 8, 2026
Whereas the Council Conference budget provides funding for Council Members to
attend conferences; and
Whereas these conferences provide valuable education for future political work; and
Whereas this provides future benefit to the residents; and
Whereas in an election year it is uncertain which Council Members will be seeking re-
election, and of those who will win; and
Whereas fiscal responsibility and respect for the taxpayer's dollar is a Council
obligation;
1. Now Therefore Be It Hereby Resolved That following Nomination Day in the year of a
regular municipal election, the budget will not be used to fund conferences for
Members of Council.
Page 104 of 114
100 John West Way
Aurora, Ontario
L4G 6J1
(905) 727-3123
aurora.ca
Town of Aurora
Member Motion
Councillor Weese
Re: Review of York Region District School Board (YRDSB) Gymnasium
Permitting Fee Schedule
To: Mayor and Members of Council
From: Councillor Ron Weese
Date: September 8, 2026
Whereas the Town of Aurora recognizes the significant contribution that local sport
organizations make to the health, well-being, development and quality of life of children
and youth in Aurora; and
Whereas community-based sport provides children and youth with opportunities to
participate in regular physical activity while developing teamwork, discipline,
confidence, leadership, friendships and other important social skills in a structured,
supervised and safe environment; and
Whereas local not-for-profit sport organizations rely extensively on school gymnasiums
and other school facilities to deliver affordable recreation and sport programming to
children and youth, particularly during the fall, winter and spring seasons when indoor
facilities are unavailable, or unsuitable; and
Whereas access to affordable gymnasium space is therefore an important component
of maintaining accessible and affordable community sport programming in Aurora; and
Whereas the York Region District School Board (YRDSB) has recently published its
gymnasium permitting fee schedule, which represents significant increases in facility
rental costs for community organizations and sport groups that come into immediate
effect without adequate notice for budgeting purposes; and
Whereas increased facility rental costs place additional financial pressure on local
volunteer-led and not-for-profit sport organizations, which already face increasing costs
associated with insurance, equipment, officials, coaches, staffing, administration and
program delivery; and
Page 105 of 114
Review of York Region District School Board (YRDSB) Gymnasium Permitting Fee
Schedule
September 8, 2026 Page 2 of 3
Whereas these additional costs must ultimately be passed on to families through
increased registration fees, creating a barrier to participation for children and youth
from families who may already be experiencing financial pressures; and
Whereas higher participation costs risk preventing some children and youth from
accessing healthy, socially constructive, supervised and safe sport activities, potentially
reducing participation in organized community sport; and
Whereas the impact of increased facility rental fees is particularly concerning for
programs serving children and youth with disabilities, where program delivery may
require specialized facilities, additional staffing, smaller participant-to-coach ratios,
adapted equipment and additional operational resources; and
Whereas the Town of Aurora has an interest in ensuring that children and youth,
including children and youth with disabilities, have equitable access to affordable
opportunities for physical activity, recreation and sport; and
Whereas collaboration among the Town, the YRDSB and local sport and recreation
organizations is essential to maintaining a sustainable and accessible community sport
system; and
Whereas a review of the current gymnasium permitting fee schedule by the YRDSB
would provide an opportunity to assess the impact of the increased fees on local sport
organizations, program affordability and participation by children and youth;
1. Now Therefore Be It Hereby Resolved That the Town of Aurora request that the York
Region District School Board review the most recent published permitting fee
schedule, with particular consideration given to its impact on not-for-profit
community sport organizations and the affordability of children's and youth sport
programming; and
2. Be It Further Resolved That the YRDSB be requested to consult with affected
municipalities, local not-for-profit sport organizations and other community
recreation providers as part of that review; and
3. Be It Further Resolved That the YRDSB be requested, as a priority, to either restore
the current published gymnasium permitting fees to the levels in effect prior to the
recently announced increases, or establish a dedicated municipal/non-profit
community-sport rental rate that provides affordable access to school gymnasiums
Page 106 of 114
Review of York Region District School Board (YRDSB) Gymnasium Permitting Fee
Schedule
September 8, 2026 Page 3 of 3
for eligible not-for-profit organizations delivering children's and youth sport
programming; and
4. Be It Further Resolved That any municipal/non-profit community-sport rate
recognizes the public benefit provided by volunteer-led sport organizations and is
structured to support affordable participant registration fees, rather than requiring
increased facility costs to be passed on to families; and
5. Be It Further Resolved That consideration be given to programs serving children and
youth with disabilities, including consideration of reduced or subsidized facility
rental rates where appropriate, recognizing the additional costs frequently
associated with accessible and adaptive sport programming; and
6. Be It Further Resolved That this resolution authorizes the Town Clerk to forward this
resolution to the Chair and Director of Education of the York Region District School
Board and to the local school trustees representing Aurora, requesting that the
matter be reviewed as soon as practicable; and
7. Be It Further Resolved That a copy of this resolution be provided to all municipalities
within The Regional Municipality of York, requesting their consideration and support
for affordable access to school facilities for community-based children's and youth
sport programming; and
8. Be It Further Resolved That a copy of this resolution be provided to The Honourable
Doug Ford, Premier of Ontario; Honourable Paul Calandra, Minister of Education;
Dawn Gallagher Murphy, MPP Newmarket—Aurora; and Honourable Michael Parsa,
MPP Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill.
Page 107 of 114
100 John West Way
Aurora, Ontario
L4G 6J1
(905) 727-3123
aurora.ca
Town of Aurora
Memorandum
Mayor’s Office
Re:York Regional Council Highlights of June 25, 2026
To:Members of Council
From:Mayor Mrakas
Date:September 8, 2026
Recommendation
1.That the York Regional Council Highlights of June 25,2026,be received for
information.
Attachments
1.York Regional Council Highlights of June 25, 2026
Page 108 of 114
1
Friday, June 26, 2026
York Regional Council – Thursday, June 25, 2026
Live streaming of the public session of Council and Committee of the Whole meetings is available on
the day of the meeting from 9 a.m. until the close of the meeting. Past sessions are available at
york.ca/CouncilAndCommittee
2025 Community Report highlights progress on resident priorities
York Regional Council received York Region’s 2025 Community Report, which showcases progress on
the priorities that matter most to residents and provides an update on achievements under the 2023 to
2027 Strategic Plan and the Region’s budget.
Key accomplishments include:
• Delivered 127 billion litres of clean and safe drinking water and achieved a 100% compliance
rate on water quality systems
• Reached a 90% waste diversion rate
• Added 33 new paramedics
• Supported 5,600 residents through homelessness community programs
• Provided 23.7 million transit trips with 94% on-time performance
• Implemented Vision Zero safety measures at 214 locations
• Committed $25 million to help establish the York University School of Medicine
The report notes that 75% of Strategic Plan performance measures are trending in the desired
direction, reflecting continued progress toward building strong, caring, safe communities while
maintaining long-term financial sustainability and delivering high-quality services to York Region’s
growing population.
Visit york.ca/AnnualReports to find out more.
York Region committed to advancing development of the North York-Durham Sewage System
Expansion
During a special meeting on Thursday, June 11, 2026, Regional Council approved York Region’s
submission of the North York-Durham Sewage System Expansion to the Development Charge
Reduction Program (DCRP) as part of the $8.8 billion Canada-Ontario Partnership to Build program
announced earlier this year.
The North York-Durham Sewage System Expansion (NYDSS) is a provincially directed growth-enabling
project approved through the Supporting Growth and Housing in York and Durham Regions Act, 2022.
Once complete, it will deliver wastewater servicing capacity to approximately 50,000 new homes and
150,000 future residents across the Towns of Aurora, East Gwillimbury and Newmarket, while
strengthening capacity across the broader regional wastewater network.
Page 109 of 114
2
Submissions to the program were due Friday, June 19, 2026, with a decision expected in summer
2026. Should funding not be 100% of the $1.74 billion requested for the NYDSS, staff will bring an
update to Regional Council this summer with additional details once eligible projects and related
funding have been confirmed.
York Region will continue to work with all levels of government to deliver growth-enabling infrastructure
to support future communities while maintaining long-term financial sustainability.
York Region’s new 10-Year Housing and Homelessness Plan
Regional Council approved York Region’s new 2026 to 2035 Housing and Homelessness Plan,
establishing a roadmap to address growing housing and homelessness challenges, strengthen the
housing system and improve outcomes for residents over the next decade.
The plan responds to increasing demand across the housing system, including more than 22,000
households waiting for subsidized housing, average wait times of 10 years for community housing and
approximately 2,400 people experiencing homelessness in 2025.
Key priorities of the new plan include:
• Increasing and preserving rental housing supply through new and repaired community,
supportive, emergency and transitional housing
• Helping people find and keep housing through homelessness prevention, outreach services and
housing supports
• Strengthening and advocating for a more responsive housing system in partnership with
municipalities, housing providers, community agencies and senior governments
To support these priorities, York Region’s 2026 10-year capital plan includes more than 580 new
affordable and subsidized homes and 244 new and redeveloped emergency and transitional housing
units. The 2026 budget invests $95 million in housing and homelessness initiatives.
Additionally, York Region’s Housing and Homelessness Committee endorsed extending the Rapid
Transit/Infrastructure Levy for Council’s consideration, which could help double the Region’s non-
market housing target from approximately 1,000 to 2,000 new units with federal and provincial support.
For more information on housing, visit york.ca/Housing
York Region supports efforts to strengthen Ontario’s economy and supply chains
through new municipal Buy Ontario directive
Regional Council received an update on York Region’s approach to implementing the Municipal Buy
Ontario Procurement Directive, enacted under the Buy Ontario Act (Public Sector Procurement),
2025. This directive applies to municipalities, municipal service corporations and local boards outlining
mandatory requirements to prioritize Ontario and Canadian goods and services through procurement
policies and evaluation criteria.
This directive follows York Region’s submission to the Province with feedback on proposed Buy Ontario
policies in March 2026. It includes the following policies for light duty fleet vehicles and capital
infrastructure projects:
• Light Fleet Vehicle Policy - applicable to all new procurements of new light duty passenger
fleet vehicles with a maximum total weight of 4,500 kilograms or less
Page 110 of 114
3
• Capital Infrastructure Policy – applicable to all new capital infrastructure procurements,
including construction projects, fixtures, furniture and equipment tied to construction and transit
fleet vehicles such as buses
York Region is committed to successfully supporting implementation of the directive and continues to
work collaboratively with the Province, industry partners and municipal peers to strengthen Ontario’s
economy and domestic supply chains while maintaining fair, open and transparent procurement
practices.
York Region will continue to monitor implementation outcomes, market availability, competition, project
delivery timelines and financial impacts to ensure compliance with the directive and support informed
decision-making. Staff will report back to Regional Council in early 2027 on implementation and provide
additional opportunities to expand a buy Ontario and Canada approach to other procurements, within
trade treaty obligation limits.
York Region to Support the 2026 Ontario Honda Dealers Indy at Markham
The Ontario Honda Dealers Indy will take place in the City of Markham this year, marking the first
year of a 5-year commitment to host the annual event. The Indy presents valuable opportunities to
generate economic activity for York Region and the City of Markham, while showcasing the broader
Region to visitors.
York Region will support the event through several service areas including Police, Paramedics, Public
Health, Public Works and York Region Transit.
Support for this event for both York Region and York Regional Police will be based on final event
requirements and is expected to be covered within the Region’s approved 2026 Budget.
Costs for future Ontario Honda Dealers Indy will be included in the 2027-2030 budget process. York
Region is taking steps to offset any costs where possible, including working with senior governments.
To learn more about the event, visit Markham.ca/Indy
York Region assuming ownership of Elgin Mills Road in the City of Markham
Regional Council approved assuming ownership of Elgin Mills Road from the east limit of Victoria
Square Boulevard to York Durham Line from the City of Markham to York Region. The assumption
would occur once the City of Markham has completed corridor improvements to the section of Elgin
Mills from Victoria Square Boulevard to Warden Avenue.
The road assumption responds to a request from the City of Markham to transfer ownership and
operation of this corridor to the Region, extending an existing Regional route and improving continuity
across municipal borders.
The assumption aligns with the Region Road Assumption Policy and includes an estimated $200,000
annual operating cost to be incorporated into future budgets.
For more information, please visit york.ca/roads
Page 111 of 114
4
Regional Council supporting new truck turn lane restriction across York Region
Regional Council is amending Bylaw 2018-07 restricting trucks exceeding seven metres in length from
using the inside lane at dual left-turn intersections.
Due to their larger turning radius, trucks often require more space to safely complete left turns and may
enter adjacent lanes when using the inside lane at dual-left turn intersections.
As part of York Region’s Vision Zero Traveller Safety Plan, this amendment will improve intersection
safety and help reduce severe collisions. The amendment follows best practices for truck operators
and includes an overview of proposed signage, enforcement measures and implementation details
Learn more about what York Region is doing to improve road safety at york.ca/TravellerSafetyPlan
York Region continues progress toward net-zero despite rising emissions pressures
Regional Council received an update on York Region’s 2025 corporate greenhouse gas emissions and
energy costs, highlighting the impact of growth and weather-related pressures while demonstrating
continued progress toward the Region’s net-zero emissions goal by 2050.
Key achievements in the 2025 Corporate Energy Update include:
• Fleet electrification efforts avoided approximately 500 tonnes of emissions
• Electric buses avoided 310 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions
• 75 battery electric buses were added to the transit fleet, and an additional 50 buses are
scheduled for delivery in late 2026
• Light-duty vehicle fuel efficiency improved by 23% since 2021
Corporate emissions increased by 6,400 tonnes in 2025, representing an 8% increase over 2024. The
increase was driven by service growth and weather impacts, with expanded service levels contributing
3,850 tonnes and weather-related energy use contributing 2,550 tonnes.
York Region’s Energy Conservation and Demand Management Plan and Climate Change Action Plan
continue to guide efforts to reduce emissions, improve energy efficiency and support the Region’s
transition to net-zero emissions by 2050.
Supporting collaborative planning for Stouffville GO Corridor
Regional Council supported a motion from City of Markham Regional Councillor Jim Jones to explore
opportunities to strengthen the Stouffville GO Transit Corridor through a coordinated, corridor-wide
planning approach.
Subject to senior government funding, York Region would collaborate with municipal, provincial and
transit partners to better align transit, housing, employment and community uses along the corridor,
improve ridership and support sustainable growth.
Proposed work would include a comprehensive master planning study and transit-oriented community
planning for station areas along the corridor to help identify future investment and development
opportunities.
York Region supports high-speed rail station in the City of Markham
Regional Council supported a motion from City of Markham Mayor Frank Scarpitti expressing support
for the inclusion of a high-speed rail station in the City of Markham as part of any future high-speed rail
corridor serving the Greater Toronto Area.
Page 112 of 114
5
The motion recognizes the City of Markham and York Region as a strategic location for a future station,
citing the Region’s growing population and employment base, strong transit connections and potential
to serve as a regional mobility hub. Regional Council also called on the federal and provincial
governments to include both the City of Markham and York Region in future planning, feasibility and
technical studies related to high-speed rail development.
York Region residents recognized with Ontario Senior Achievement Awards
Regional Council congratulated four York Region residents who received the 2025 Ontario Senior
Achievement Award for outstanding contributions to their communities.
Judy Smith and Dr. Stephen Stokl of the Town of Newmarket and Anna Passarelli and Maria-Eva
Cristante of the City of Vaughan were recognized for their exceptional contributions. Council thanked
them for their dedication to supporting seniors, strengthening communities and improving the lives of
residents across York Region.
York Region receives national collaboration award for cycling infrastructure
York Region was recognized with a 2026 Canadian Association of Municipal Administrators
Collaboration Award for the Regional Role in Cycling Path Ownership and Maintenance project.
The award highlights the strong partnership between York Region and local municipalities in delivering
coordinated, efficient and safe cycling infrastructure for residents.
York Region team recognized for coordinated homelessness response
Regional Council recognized York Region’s Housing and Community Programs team on receiving an
Ontario Municipal Social Services Association Local Municipal Champions Award for its Coordinated
Approach to Outreach and Encampment Response.
The award recognized collaborative efforts to connect vulnerable residents with supports, housing
options and services while working alongside community partners and local municipalities.
YorkInfo receives provincial excellence award
Regional Council recognized York Region’s Digital, Data, Technology and Customer Experience team
and its municipal partners for receiving a 2026 Excellence in Municipal Systems Award from the
Municipal Information Systems Association of Ontario.
The award recognizes YorkInfo, a longstanding partnership that supports data sharing, service delivery
and informed decision-making across York Region.
June Observances
Regional Council recognized the following observances in June 2026:
• Pride Month
• National Indigenous History Month
• Seniors Month
• Health Professionals Week – June 18 to 24, 2026
• National Indigenous Peoples Day – June 21, 2026
• Canadian Multiculturalism Day – June 27, 2026
• Canada Day – July 1, 2026
Page 113 of 114
6
Next meeting of York Regional Council
The next regularly scheduled meeting of York Regional Council will be held on Thursday, September
24, 2026, at 9 a.m. in the York Region Administrative Centre Council Chambers, located at 17250
Yonge Street in the Town of Newmarket. The Council meeting will be streamed on york.ca/Live
The Regional Municipality of York consists of nine local cities and towns and provides a variety of
programs and services to more than 1.3 million residents and 58,000 businesses with more than
624,000 employees. More information about York Region’s key service areas is available
at york.ca/RegionalServices
-30-
Media Contact:
Kylie-Anne Doerner, Corporate Communications, The Regional Municipality of York
Cell: 905-806-7138
Email: kylie-anne.doerner@york.ca
Page 114 of 114