Agenda (Appointed) - Cannabis Retail Review Task Force - 20260827
Town of Aurora
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Meeting Revised Agenda
Date:Thursday, August 27, 2026
Time:7 p.m.
Location:Holland Room, Aurora Town Hall
Meetings are available to the public in person and via live stream on the Town’s YouTube channel.
To participate, please visit aurora.ca/participation.
Pages
1.Call to Order
Note: Added items are marked with an asterisk (*).
2.Land Acknowledgement
3.Approval of the Agenda
4.Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
5.Receipt of the Minutes
5.1 Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes of June 18, 2026 1
That the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force meeting minutes of
June 18, 2026, be received for information.
1.
6.Delegations
7.Matters for Consideration
7.1 Memorandum from Manager, Corporate Communications; Re: Retail
Cannabis Stores in Aurora Survey Feedback
5
That the memorandum regarding Retail Cannabis Stores in
Aurora Survey Feedback be received; and
1.
That the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force comments
regarding Retail Cannabis Stores in Aurora Survey Feedback be
received and referred to staff for consideration and further
action as appropriate.
2.
*7.2 Round Table Discussion: Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Final
Findings and Recommendations
41
That the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Final Findings and
Recommendations be received; and
1.
That the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force comments
regarding the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Final Findings
and Recommendations be received and referred to staff for
consideration and further action as appropriate.
2.
8.Informational Items
9.New Business
10.Adjournment
Town of Aurora
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Meeting Minutes
Date:
Time:
Location:
Thursday, June 18, 2026
7 p.m.
Holland Room, Aurora Town Hall
Committee Members: Councillor John Gallo (Chair)
Councillor Ron Weese (Vice Chair)
Nikki Alber
Megan Bamford*
Judy Collins*
Lenard Lind
William Newton, York Regional Police Representative*
Laura Schaffer
Ian Smith
Other Attendees: James Gagnon, Bylaw Enforcement/Licensing Officer
Andrew Poray, Manager, Economic Development*
Patricia De Sario, Director, Corporate Services/Town Solicitor
Daniel Ruberto, Deputy Town Clerk
Linda Bottos, Council/Committee Coordinator
*Attended electronically
_____________________________________________________________________
1. Call to Order
The Chair called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
2. Land Acknowledgement
The Committee acknowledged that the meeting took place on Anishinaabe lands,
the traditional and treaty territory of the Chippewas of Georgina Island,
recognizing the many other Nations whose presence here continues to this day,
the special relationship the Chippewas have with the lands and waters of this
territory, and that Aurora has shared responsibility for the stewardship of these
Page 1 of 49
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes
June 18, 2026 2
lands and waters. It was noted that Aurora is part of the treaty lands of the
Mississaugas and Chippewas, recognized through Treaty #13 and the Williams
Treaties of 1923.
3. Approval of the Agenda
Moved by Councillor Ron Weese
Seconded by Nikki Alber
That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved.
Carried
4. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
There were no declarations of pecuniary interest under the Municipal Conflict of
Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M.50.
5. Receipt of the Minutes
5.1 Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes of April 16, 2026
Moved by Nikki Alber
Seconded by Laura Schaffer
1. That the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force meeting minutes of April
16, 2026, be received for information.
Carried
6. Delegations
None.
7. Matters for Consideration
7.1 Round Table Discussion; Re: Follow-up to Review of Cannabis Retail Stores
The Chair provided a findings framework to facilitate the discussion and
reviewed the proposed key findings learned from the Task Force review of
data from Town staff, including By-law Services, York Regional Police
(YRP), Council reports, provincial regulations, and feedback from residents
Page 2 of 49
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes
June 18, 2026 3
and business owners. The proposed findings included: (1) Cannabis retail
stores have generally not created significant Town-wide public safety or
enforcement concerns; (2) Some neighbouring residents and businesses
continue to experience impacts that may not be fully reflected in formal
complaint statistics; (3) The primary concerns identified relate to location,
clustering, compatibility and nuisance impacts rather than cannabis retail
operations themselves; (4) Aurora identified many of these concerns prior
to legalization and retail implementation; and (5) Municipal authority
remains limited.
The Chair advised that a motion would be proposed at the June 23, 2026
Council meeting to direct staff to conduct a survey of residents and
businesses located within a specified distance of licensed cannabis retail
stores and provide the results to the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
prior to its final meeting in August 2026.
The Task Force and staff discussed various matters including: focus of
the survey; by-law and enforcement limitations; complaint reporting,
possible gaps in call data capture and lack of education on the complaint
process; response timing; YRP data, call priorities and services; the
suggested need for a complaint-driven monitoring system with a defined
response trigger point; the assignment of resources where they would be
most effective; and the oversight responsibilities of the Alcohol and
Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO).
The Task Force inquired about the potential use of funding received from
the Province, as detailed in the May 16, 2023 staff report no. PDS23-062 –
Retail Cannabis Update 2023, and staff agreed to report back on any
expenditure details.
The Task Force further inquired about whether the Town had received any
responses to its earlier communications to AGCO, and staff provided an
update. There was further discussion on learning the experiences and best
practices of other GTA municipalities that have opted in, and the possible
submission of a joint communication to AGCO. Staff agreed to follow up.
The Task Force was generally supportive of the proposed findings and
following recommendations.
Local recommendations:
Page 3 of 49
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes
June 18, 2026 4
Improved public awareness of reporting channels
Targeted enforcement where warranted
Enhanced communication between operators, property owners, and
neighbours
Periodic monitoring and reporting
Provincial recommendations: That Council advocate to the Province and
AGCO to:
Implement Aurora’s 2019 recommendations respecting separation
distances
Permit municipalities to establish separation distances between stores
Permit municipalities to establish setbacks from sensitive land uses
Provide municipalities with greater authority over clustering and
location decisions
Moved by Councillor Ron Weese
Seconded by Nikki Alber
1. That the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force comments regarding
Follow-up to Review of Cannabis Retail Stores be received and referred
to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate.
Carried
8. Informational Items
None.
9. New Business
None.
10. Adjournment
Moved by Nikki Alber
Seconded by Lenard Lind
That the meeting be adjourned at 7:43 p.m.
Carried
Page 4 of 49
100 John West Way
Aurora, Ontario
L4G 6J1
(905) 727-3123
aurora.ca
Town of Aurora
Memorandum
Office of the Chief Administrative Officer
Re: Retail Cannabis Stores in Aurora Survey Feedback
To: Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
From: Carley Smith, Manager, Corporate Communications
Date: August 27, 2026
Recommendation
1. That the memorandum regarding Retail Cannabis Stores in Aurora Survey Feedback
be received; and
2. That the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force comments regarding Retail Cannabis
Stores in Aurora Survey Feedback be received and referred to staff for consideration
and further action as appropriate.
Background
At its meeting on Tuesday, June 23, Council passed a motion that included direction to
staff to “conduct a survey of residents and businesses located within a specified
distance of licensed cannabis retail stores in Aurora and provide the results to the
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force prior to its final meeting.”
According to the Town’s data, there are 13 cannabis retail locations in Aurora, primarily
located along and near Yonge and Wellington Streets.
Following discussion with the Co-chairs of the Task Force, it was decided that due to
time and financial constraints the survey would be town-wide and promoted digitally
rather than targeting residents and businesses within a specified distance from retail
locations. The intention of the survey was to obtain feedback from Aurora residents and
businesses regarding retail cannabis stores and their impact on the community.
The Cannabis Retail Review Survey was promoted across a range of the Town’s
communications channels, including social media, the Town website, the Noticeboard,
Page 5 of 49
Retail Cannabis Stores in Aurora Survey Feedback
August 27, 2026 Page 2 of 3
digital signage at recreation centres, the Aurora Matters e-newsletter, and the Engage
Aurora e-newsletter.
The survey was available on the Town’s Engagement website at
engageaurora.ca/cannabisretailsurvey and was open from July 14 to August 9, 2026.
The survey site received 479 visitors and 154 survey completions.
Analysis
The Town’s Cannabis Retail Store Community Impact Survey received 154 responses.
Overall, the results indicate that respondents had mixed views regarding cannabis retail
stores, although responses generally leaned negative. Approximately 64 per cent rated
the overall impact of cannabis retail stores on Aurora as somewhat or very negative,
compared with 23 per cent who rated the impact positively.
Respondents expressed particular concern about the number and concentration of
cannabis retail stores in Aurora. Approximately 71 per cent indicated that there are too
many cannabis retail stores, while 20 per cent felt the current number is about right and
two per cent felt there are too few. Despite these concerns, views on whether cannabis
retail should operate in Aurora were more divided, with 42 per cent supportive, 49 per
cent opposed and approximately 10 per cent neutral.
When asked about specific community impacts, the most commonly identified concern
was youth exposure, reported by approximately 52 per cent of respondents. Other
negative impacts included increased loitering and litter (27 per cent each), traffic or
parking issues (19 per cent), and noise (8 per cent). At the same time, respondents
identified some positive impacts, including increased convenience for consumers,
employment opportunities, improved occupancy of commercial spaces and increased
business activity. Forty-four per cent indicated that they had observed no positive
impacts, while 20 per cent reported observing no negative impacts.
Responses regarding the operation and appearance of individual stores were somewhat
more balanced. Approximately 47 per cent agreed that cannabis stores are well
maintained and present a professional appearance, compared with approximately 32
per cent who disagreed. Views on whether stores operate responsibly were also mixed,
with 40 per cent neither agreeing nor disagreeing. However, respondents were more
negative regarding compatibility with surrounding businesses and impacts on
neighbourhood character.
Page 6 of 49
Retail Cannabis Stores in Aurora Survey Feedback
August 27, 2026 Page 3 of 3
Open-ended comments reinforced the quantitative findings. The most frequent themes
related to the number and concentration of stores, proximity to schools and other
sensitive locations, youth exposure, cannabis odour, loitering, litter, signage and the
perceived effect on Aurora’s community character. Some respondents who generally
supported legal cannabis retail also expressed concern that there are too many
locations or that stores are located too close together. Conversely, other respondents
emphasized that cannabis is a legal and regulated product, that stores provide
consumer convenience and economic benefits, and that concerns such as litter and
loitering are not necessarily unique to cannabis businesses.
Overall, the survey suggests that the primary concern among respondents is less about
the existence of legal cannabis retail and more about the perceived number,
concentration and location of stores within Aurora, together with associated concerns
regarding youth exposure and neighbourhood impacts. The results also demonstrate
that a segment of respondents supports cannabis retail and views the businesses as
legitimate, regulated retail operations.
Attachments
1. Cannabis Survey Report
2. Correspondence from Michael J. Armstrong
Page 7 of 49
Page 8 of 49
Page 9 of 49
Page 10 of 49
Page 11 of 49
Page 12 of 49
Page 13 of 49
Page 14 of 49
Page 15 of 49
Page 16 of 49
Page 17 of 49
Page 18 of 49
Page 19 of 49
Page 20 of 49
Page 21 of 49
Page 22 of 49
Page 23 of 49
Page 24 of 49
Page 25 of 49
Page 26 of 49
Page 27 of 49
Page 28 of 49
Page 29 of 49
Page 30 of 49
Page 31 of 49
Page 32 of 49
Page 33 of 49
Page 34 of 49
Page 35 of 49
Page 36 of 49
Page 37 of 49
Page 38 of 49
Attachment 2 - Correspondence from Michael J. Armstrong
Page 1 of 2
From: Michael Armstrong <marmstrong2@brocku.ca>
Sent: July 27, 2026 9:20 AM
To: Smith, Carley <CSmith@aurora.ca>
Subject: Research on impaired driving after recreational cannabis legalization
Hello,
I am writing regarding the review of cannabis retailing that is currently underway in
Aurora. I understand that it includes looking at impaired driving.
As a university professor, my research in recent years has examined various aspects of
cannabis legalization in Canada. In a study published earlier this year, I looked at drug-
impaired and alcohol-impaired driving data reported by police in Canada from 2009 to
2023. (The data unfortunately did not name the specific drugs involved.) I analyzed how
annual rates changed after 2018, when the federal government legalized cannabis but
also gave police more enforcement power.
I found that impairment rates increased after 2018 for drugs but also for alcohol. The
drug increase was correlated mostly with enhanced enforcement; e.g., when provinces
trained more police to detect drug impairment, they subsequently reported more drug
impairment. To a lesser extent, the increase was also correlated with pandemic
restrictions. There was a correlation with cannabis sales, but it was much weaker than
the other two.
Here is a short summary of the study:
After Canada legalized cannabis, police caught more drunk drivers
https://theconversation.com/after-canada-legalized-cannabis-police-caught-more-
drunk-drivers-272244
Here is a longer summary that is intended for Ontario policymakers. It describes other
Canadian research on impaired driving since 2018 and includes some statistics specific
to Ontario, so it might especially interest your councillors.
Changes In Canada’s Impaired Driving Rates Since 2018
https://brocku.ca/niagara-community-observatory/wp-
content/uploads/sites/117/Brock-NCO-Policy-Brief-63-Changes-In-Canadas-Impaired-
Driving-Rates-Since-2018-ARMSTRONG-Final-February-2026.pdf
I can also say that although cannabis-impaired driving is a serious concern, police
statistics indicate it is much less common than other impairment. In 2022 in Ontario, for
Page 39 of 49
Attachment 2 - Correspondence from Michael J. Armstrong
Page 2 of 2
example, 76% of incidents involved only alcohol, 8% involved only drugs, and 6%
involved both alcohol and drugs. For 10% of cases the police did not report the
substance type.
Statistics Canada Table 35-10-0177-01, Incident-based crime statistics
https://doi.org/10.25318/3510017701-eng
In a smaller sample of drug-impairments in Ontario that year where police named the
substance involved, cannabis (i.e., THC) was the impairing substance only about one-
fifth of the time. Narcotics (e.g., opioids) and stimulants (e.g., meth) were both more
common.
2023 Annual National Data Report to Inform Trends and Patterns in Drug-Impaired
Driving
https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/2023-did-fad/index-en.aspx#s7.8
I hope you find this information useful. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Michael J. Armstrong
Professor of operations research at Brock University
Email: michael.armstrong@brocku.ca
Web: https://brocku.ca/goodman/faculty-research/faculty-directory/michael-
armstrong/
Page 40 of 49
Page 1 of 9
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Final Findings and Recommendations
August 27, 2026
1. Purpose
The Cannabis Retail Review Task Force was established by Council to review the Town
of Aurora's experience since opting in to Ontario's retail cannabis framework and to
report back to Council with findings and recommendations.
The Task Force reviewed the provincial regulatory framework, previous Council
decisions and reports, information from Town staff and York Regional Police,
enforcement and complaint information, community concerns, the experience of
neighbouring residents and businesses, and feedback received through the 2026
Cannabis Retail Review Survey.
The Task Force recognizes that legal cannabis retailers are legitimate businesses
operating within a provincially regulated framework. The purpose of this review is not to
reconsider the legalization of cannabis or Aurora's decision to opt in, but to determine
what has been learned from Aurora's experience and identify opportunities to better
address community impacts.
2. Background
Aurora Council opted in to permit private cannabis retail stores on January 21, 2019.
At the same time, Council recognized potential concerns regarding the location and
concentration of cannabis retail stores and requested that the Alcohol and Gaming
Commission of Ontario consider additional location restrictions.
Specifically, Council requested:
• A minimum 150-metre separation between cannabis retail stores; and
• A minimum 150-metre separation between cannabis retail stores and specified
sensitive uses, including daycares, nurseries, parks, group homes, addiction and
Page 41 of 49
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Final Findings and Recommendations August 27, 2026
counselling facilities, recreation facilities, the Aurora Public Library, Town Hall
and similar public gathering uses.
Despite Council's request, these additional criteria were not adopted by the AGCO.
The Province currently requires a 150-metre separation from schools and private
schools. Municipalities do not have authority to license private cannabis retailers or
regulate cannabis retail as a separate land use. Cannabis stores are otherwise subject
to the same applicable municipal zoning requirements as other permitted retail uses.
The Town's 2023 Retail Cannabis Update subsequently confirmed that the number or
proximity of cannabis stores is not an objectionable criterion under the provincial
framework and that municipalities have no control over their locations beyond the
zoning requirements applicable to retail uses generally.
3. Community Survey
Council authorized a Cannabis Retail Review Survey to provide the Task Force with
current community feedback.
The survey was conducted from July 14 to August 9, 2026 and was promoted through
Town communication channels.
The survey received:
• 479 visits; and
• 154 completed responses.
The survey should be considered an important source of community feedback rather
than a statistically representative referendum of all Aurora residents.
Overall, the survey indicates that the principal concern among respondents is not simply
the existence of legal cannabis retail stores. Concerns are more strongly associated
with:
• The number of cannabis retail stores;
• Concentration and clustering;
• Store locations;
• Proximity to sensitive uses;
Page 42 of 49
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Final Findings and Recommendations August 27, 2026
• Youth exposure; and
• Neighbourhood impacts.
The Task Force also recognizes that a segment of respondents supports cannabis retail
and considers these businesses legitimate and appropriately regulated retail
operations.
These results generally reinforce the location and concentration concerns identified by
Aurora Council when it opted in to cannabis retail in 2019.
4. Task Force Findings
Finding 1: Cannabis retail has not created a significant
town-wide enforcement problem
The available information does not demonstrate widespread public safety, crime or
municipal enforcement problems associated with cannabis retail stores across Aurora.
Town staff have historically reported relatively few complaints associated with legal
cannabis retailers, and proactive By-law inspections conducted in March 2026 did not
identify violations.
The Task Force therefore does not find evidence supporting a conclusion that cannabis
retail stores, as a class of business, represent a significant town-wide enforcement
problem.
Finding 2: Town-wide statistics do not necessarily reflect
localized impacts
While aggregate complaint and enforcement numbers are relatively low, the Task Force
heard concerns regarding impacts experienced by residents and businesses
neighbouring certain cannabis retail locations.
Issues identified during the Task Force's work included:
• Litter and discarded cannabis packaging;
Page 43 of 49
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Final Findings and Recommendations August 27, 2026
• Parking;
• Signage;
• Patron behaviour;
• Loitering or prolonged gathering;
• Neighbourhood compatibility; and
• Other nuisance and quality-of-life concerns.
The Task Force finds that a relatively small number of locations can generate
significant impacts for immediate neighbours without producing large town-wide
complaint statistics.
Accordingly, aggregate complaint data should not be the sole measure used to
determine whether a localized problem exists.
Finding 3: Location and concentration are central
concerns
The Task Force finds that one of the most consistent concerns is the location and
concentration of cannabis retail stores rather than the existence of legal cannabis retail
itself.
This finding is reinforced by the 2026 community survey, which identified the perceived
number, concentration and location of stores as primary concerns.
The existing provincial framework provides Aurora with little ability to address these
concerns.
Finding 4: Aurora anticipated these concerns in 2019
The Task Force finds it significant that Aurora Council identified location and
concentration as potential concerns before cannabis retail stores began operating in
the Town.
Council's 2019 request for:
• 150-metre separation between cannabis retail stores; and
• 150-metre separation from specified sensitive uses
Page 44 of 49
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Final Findings and Recommendations August 27, 2026
was intended to provide reasonable safeguards while allowing legal cannabis retail
businesses to operate in Aurora.
Seven years of experience and the results of the 2026 review demonstrate that many of
the concerns identified by Council in 2019 remain relevant.
Finding 5: The provincial framework significantly limits
municipal control
The Task Force finds that there is a significant gap between municipal responsibility for
responding to community concerns and municipal authority to prevent or address the
underlying location issues.
Aurora can enforce generally applicable municipal bylaws, including parking, signage
and property-related regulations.
However, Aurora cannot:
• License cannabis retail stores;
• Regulate cannabis retail as a separate land use;
• Establish cannabis-specific zoning;
• Establish mandatory separation distances between cannabis stores; or
• Establish additional cannabis-specific setbacks from sensitive uses.
The ultimate authority respecting retail cannabis authorizations rests with the Province
through the AGCO.
Finding 6: Localized problems require targeted responses
Given the relatively low level of town-wide complaints but more significant concerns
associated with particular locations, the Task Force finds that targeted intervention is
preferable to blanket enforcement.
Where persistent problems are identified, the Town should coordinate available
resources and work with retailers, property owners, neighbouring businesses, residents,
By-law Services, YRP and the AGCO, as appropriate, to address the specific
circumstances.
Page 45 of 49
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Final Findings and Recommendations August 27, 2026
Finding 7: Residents need clearer information about where
and how to report concerns
Responsibility for cannabis-related concerns is divided among several organizations.
Depending upon the issue, residents may need to contact:
• Town of Aurora By-law Services;
• York Regional Police;
• The AGCO;
• York Region; or
• A property owner or business operator.
The Task Force finds that clearer public information would improve reporting, allow
concerns to be directed to the appropriate authority and improve the quality of
information available for future monitoring.
5. Recommendations
The Cannabis Retail Review Task Force recommends that Council endorse the following
actions.
A. Local Actions
1. Improve public information and reporting
That the Town develop clear public information identifying where residents and
businesses should report cannabis retail concerns, including the respective
responsibilities of the Town, AGCO, York Regional Police and other appropriate
agencies.
2. Establish a targeted response approach
That where recurring concerns are identified around a cannabis retail location,
appropriate Town departments coordinate a targeted response using existing municipal
Page 46 of 49
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Final Findings and Recommendations August 27, 2026
enforcement authorities and engage the retailer, property owner, neighbouring residents
and businesses, YRP and AGCO where appropriate.
3. Encourage retailer and property-owner engagement
That the Town encourage cannabis retailers and property owners to proactively address
legitimate neighbourhood concerns, including litter, parking, property maintenance and
patron behaviour occurring on their properties.
4. Continue monitoring
That the Town periodically monitor cannabis retail-related complaints and enforcement
activity to identify emerging trends or recurring locations of concern and report
significant developments to Council as appropriate.
B. Provincial Advocacy
5. Reaffirm Aurora's 2019 position
That Council reaffirm its January 21, 2019 position respecting cannabis retail store
locations and advocate to the Province of Ontario and the AGCO for implementation of
those principles.
Specifically, Aurora should continue to advocate for authority to establish:
• A minimum 150-metre separation between cannabis retail stores; and
• A minimum 150-metre separation between cannabis retail stores and appropriate
sensitive uses, including daycares, nurseries, parks, group homes, addiction and
counselling facilities, recreation facilities, libraries and other appropriate public
gathering places.
6. Provide municipalities greater authority over location and clustering
That Council request that the Province amend the cannabis retail regulatory framework
to provide municipalities with meaningful authority to address the location, density and
clustering of cannabis retail stores within their communities.
Page 47 of 49
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Final Findings and Recommendations August 27, 2026
Any expanded municipal authority should allow municipalities to develop locally
appropriate standards while maintaining reasonable opportunities for legal cannabis
retailers to operate.
7. Strengthen municipal input into AGCO decisions
That Council request that the Province strengthen the municipal role in the AGCO retail
store authorization process, including requiring meaningful consideration of municipal
concerns regarding location, concentration, sensitive uses and documented community
impacts.
8. Review operating conditions where neighbourhood impacts exist
That the Province and AGCO be requested to examine whether additional regulatory
tools are appropriate where a cannabis retail operation generates repeated,
documented impacts on neighbouring residential or commercial properties, including
whether operating conditions or hours may be considered where warranted.
9. Coordinate advocacy with other Ontario municipalities
That Aurora's final Task Force report and Council resolution be forwarded to:
• The Premier of Ontario;
• The appropriate Provincial Ministers;
• The AGCO;
• The Association of Municipalities of Ontario;
• York Region;
• All Ontario municipalities,
with a request for support for greater municipal authority over cannabis retail location
and clustering.
6. Conclusion
Aurora's experience with legal cannabis retail is nuanced.
The Task Force did not find evidence that cannabis retailers generally represent a
significant town-wide public safety or enforcement problem. Legal cannabis retailers
Page 48 of 49
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force
Final Findings and Recommendations August 27, 2026
are regulated businesses that contribute to Aurora's economy and should be treated
fairly.
At the same time, the review demonstrates that legitimate localized impacts can occur
and that the current provincial framework leaves municipalities with limited tools to
address one of the community's principal concerns: where cannabis stores locate and
how closely they may be concentrated.
Importantly, Aurora anticipated these issues in 2019.
When Council opted in to cannabis retail, it supported reasonable separation distances
between stores and from sensitive uses. Those recommendations were not
incorporated into the provincial framework. The concerns identified through the Task
Force's work and the 2026 community survey demonstrate that those principles remain
relevant today.
The Task Force therefore recommends a balanced approach.
Locally, Aurora should improve reporting, monitoring, communication and targeted
responses where problems occur.
Provincially, Aurora should renew and strengthen its advocacy for the principles Council
established in 2019 and request meaningful municipal authority over cannabis retail
location, concentration and neighbourhood compatibility.
This approach recognizes cannabis retailers as legitimate businesses while also
recognizing the responsibility of municipal government to protect the quality of life of
residents and neighbouring businesses.
Councillor John Gallo
Town of Aurora
Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Chair
Page 49 of 49