Loading...
Agenda - Committee of the Whole - 20260512Town of Aurora Committee of the Whole Meeting Revised Agenda Date:Tuesday, May 12, 2026 Time:7 p.m. Location:Council Chambers, Aurora Town Hall Meetings are available to the public in person and via live stream on the Town’s YouTube channel. To participate, please visit aurora.ca/participation. Pages 1.Call to Order Note: Added items are marked with an asterisk (*). 2.Land Acknowledgement 3.Approval of the Agenda 4.Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof 5.Community Presentations 5.1 Youth Engagement Committee, supported by Miranda Link, Youth and Community Development Coordinator; Re: Youth Engagement Committee (YEC) Presentation - Year in Review 1 6.Delegations *6.1 John Hartman, Resident; Re: Item 10.2 - CS26-011 - Disclosure of Documents Related to Victoria Hall Refurbishment 10 *6.2 David Heard, Resident; Re: Item 9.2 - CMS26-013 - Happy Woodland Pet Cemetery Monument Alteration Plan 11 *6.3 Leta Dayfoot, Resident; Re: Item 14.5 - PDS26-049 - Applications for OPA, ZBA and Plan of Subdivision, Eric and Theresa Jacquelene Liversidge and Livewell on Wellington General Partners Ltd., 1426 and 1452 Wellington Street East 12 *6.4 Linda Duringer, Resident; Re: Item 14.1 - PDS26-044 - Heritage Permit Application HPA-2026-02 - Victoria Hall (27 Mosley Street) 13 7.Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes 7.1 Community Recognition Review Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of April 8, 2026 14 That the Community Recognition Review Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of April 8, 2026, be received for information. 1. 7.2 Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of April 8, 2026 18 That the Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of April 8, 2026, be received for information. 1. 7.3 Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of April 13, 2026 23 That the Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of April 13, 2026, be received for information. 1. 7.4 Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes of April 16, 2026 29 That the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes of April 16, 2026, be received for information. 1. 7.5 Environmental Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of April 20, 2026 33 That the Environmental Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of April 20, 2026, be received for information. 1. 8.Consent Agenda 9.Community Services Committee Agenda 9.1 CMS26-012 - Aurora Town Square Shade Structures 38 That Report No. CMS26-012 be received; and1. That the condition on the approval of and budget authority for Capital Project No. GN-F-0106 – Aurora Town Square Sail Shade Structure in the amount of $150,000 be lifted, and the project be approved. 2. 9.2 CMS26-013 - Happy Woodland Pet Cemetery Monument Alteration Plan 65 That Report No. CMS26-013 be received; and1. That Council endorse a case‑by‑case approach to addressing racially offensive language on monuments within the Happy Woodland Pet Cemetery, including: 2. Retention of three monuments located in their original historic positions, supported by enhanced interpretation and educational materials; a. Documented removal and storage of two monuments previously displaced from their original locations; and  b. Retention of one severely damaged monument in its current condition, without reconstruction or replication of the original offensive inscription as documented in archival records. c. 10.Corporate Services Committee Agenda 10.1 CS26-004 - Council Compensation Review 77 That Report No. CS26-004 be received; and1. That Council provide direction.2. 10.2 CS26-011 - Disclosure of Documents Related to Victoria Hall Refurbishment 83 That Report No. CS26-011 be received for information.1. 11.Finance and Information Technology Committee Agenda 11.1 FIN26-016 - Reserve Framework Updates 91 That Report No. FIN26-016 be received; and1. That Council approve all identified reserve framework changes as proposed. 2. 12.Administration Committee Agenda 13.Operational Services Committee Agenda 14.Planning and Development Services Committee Agenda 14.1 PDS26-044 - Heritage Permit Application HPA-2026-02 - Victoria Hall (27 Mosley Street) 101 (Presentation to be provided by Consultants: Ryan Giuricich, Project Principal, CS&P Architects; Joey Giaimo, Principal, Giaimo; and Sara Shemirani, Associate, Giaimo) That Report No. PDS26-044 be received; and1. That Heritage Permit Application HPA-2026-02 be approved, to permit the restoration and alteration of Victoria Hall (27 Mosley Street). 2. 14.2 PDS26-045 - Heritage Permit Application HPA-2026-01 - 15375 Yonge Street 173 That Report No. PDS26-045 be received; and1. That Heritage Permit Application HPA-2026-01 for 15375 Yonge Street be approved, subject to future site plan review and approval. 2. 14.3 PDS26-046 - Request for Sign By-law Authorization for a Mural Sign - The Lind Realty Team Inc. - 15105 Yonge Street 185 That Report No. PDS26-046 be received; and1. That the request for authorization to permit a Mural Sign at 15105 Yonge Street be approved. 2. 14.4 PDS26-048 - 2025 Financial Reporting for the Aurora Economic Development Corporation 191 That Report No. PDS26-048 be received for information.1. 14.5 PDS26-049 - Applications for Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision, Eric and Theresa Jacquelene Liversidge and Livewell on Wellington General Partners Ltd., 1426 and 1452 Wellington Street East 195 Lots 1 and 2, Registered Plan 525 and Block 1, File Numbers: OPA-2025- 10, ZBA-2025-09, ZBA-2022-06, SUB-2026-01 That Report No. PDS26-049 be received; and1. That Official Plan Amendment application OPA-2025-10 be approved to redesignate the subject lands from “Community Commercial” to “Medium-High Density Residential”; and 2. That Zoning By-law Amendment application ZBA-2025-09 be approved to rezone the subject lands from “Rural (RU)” to “Townhouse Dwelling Residential (R8) Exception Zone (582)” and “Townhouse Dwelling Residential (R8) Exception Zone (583)”; and 3. That Zoning By-law Amendment application ZBA-2022-06 be approved to rezone the subject lands from “Townhouse Dwelling Residential (R8) Exception Zone (551)” to “Townhouse 4. Dwelling Residential (R8) Exception Zones (583)”; and That Draft Plan of Subdivision application SUB-2026-01 be approved as shown in Figure 6, subject to the conditions outlined in Appendix ‘A’; and 5. That the implementing By-laws for the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications be brought forward to a future Council meeting for enactment; and 6. That 84 persons worth of servicing allocation be granted to the subject lands to implement the land use permissions. 7. 15.Member Motions 15.1 Councillor Gallo; Re: R.A.I.L. 175 - Commemoration of the Arrival of Rail Service to Aurora 230 15.2 Mayor Mrakas; Re: Heritage Conservation District Street Signage 232 16.Regional Report 16.1 York Regional Council Highlights of April 23, 2026 233 That the York Regional Council Highlights of April 23, 2026, be received for information. 1. 17.New Business 18.Public Service Announcements 19.Closed Session 20.Adjournment 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Delegation Request This request and any written submissions or background information for consideration by either Council or Committees of Council is being submitted to Legislative Services. Council or Committee (Choose One) * Committee of the Whole Council or Committee Meeting Date *  2026-5-12 Subject * Youth Engagement Committee Presentation (YEC) - Year in Review Full Name of Spokesperson and Name of Group or Person(s) being Represented (if applicable) * Youth Engagement Committee, supported by Miranda Link - Youth & Community Development Coordinator Brief Summary of Issue or Purpose of Delegation * The Youth Engagement Council would like to share a summary of the projects, events, and achievements they’ve completed during this year. The purpose of this delegation is to highlight the positive impact of their work in the community, thank Council for its support, and offer insights on how youth can continue contributing to a vibrant and engaged Aurora. Have you been in contact with a Town staff or Council member regarding your matter of interest? * Yes No I acknowledge that the Procedure By-law permits five (5) minutes for Delegations. * Agree I acknowledge that I understand and accept the delegate conduct expectations as outlined in Section 32(b) of the Procedure By-law 6228-19, as amended (link below) * Agree Click to view Procedure By-law 6228-19, as amended.  Page 1 of 241 Youth Engagement CommitteePage 2 of 241 TOWN OF AURORA, DEPARTMENT OR PROJECT HEADINGIntroduction - Iman ChaudaryƔGroup of 13 students ƔAmplify the voices of Auroran youthƔRepresent 8 schools across York RegionƔOrganize and implement events and initiatives geared towards youthƔAddress pressing matters pertaining to youthOur team: Serena, Stella, Anton, Lia, Ayaana, Rhea, Lilly, Bahar, Natalie, Grace, Denise, Iman, JackPage 3 of 241 TOWN OF AURORAHistory of the Youth Engagement Committee - Serena Yogaraj1995: Small youth sub-committee formed, dissolved in 1 year1996: Student survey launched by Leisure Services1997: Y.A.C. (Youth Advisory Committee) recommended to Town Council1,100+ students surveyed — led to Aurora Youth Centre2001–2007: Y.A.C. ran events, raised issues, worked with schools2007: Closed due to low teen interestL.S.A.C. included 2 youth members during gap2014: Teens from multiple schools presented need for new committeeResult: YEC formed — helped create Youth Centre & teen-focused eventsPage 4 of 241 TOWN OF AURORA, DEPARTMENT OR PROJECT HEADING2025/2026 Events - Rhea ManekƔYouth Volunteer Fair (October 2025)ƔAurora Haunted Forest (October 2025)ƔHoliday Movie Night (December 2025)ƔLoft Refresh (January 2026)ƔKaraoke night (February 2026)?ƔNational Youth Week Events (May 2026)żFlag Raising CeremonyżLive Music Night in the LoftżYouth Table Tennis WorkshopżCake Decorating Page 5 of 241 TOWN OF AURORA, DEPARTMENT OR PROJECT HEADINGEvent Improvements - Rhea ManekƔLoft Refresh - Redecorated the loft, more activities for engagementƔVolunteer Fair: 100 participants and representation of YEC ƔCommittee Growth: 13 members representing 8 schoolsƔIncreased social media engagementPage 6 of 241 TOWN OF AURORA, DEPARTMENT OR PROJECT HEADINGFuture Growth - Lia Mueller & Grace VrabelƔUpcoming event: Teen Beach Party – June 25thƔCommitment to inclusive, skill-building, and safe-space eventsƔEvents to bring youth councils in York Region togetherƔContinued use of social media to connect and engage youthƔUtilize the Loft more for events Page 7 of 241 TOWN OF AURORA, DEPARTMENT OR PROJECT HEADINGConclusion - Bahar FallahziaraniYEC FAMILY Page 8 of 241 Thank You!Page 9 of 241 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Delegation Request This request and any written submissions or background information for consideration by either Council or Committees of Council is being submitted to Legislative Services. Council or Committee (Choose One) * Committee of the Whole Council or Committee Meeting Date *  2026-5-12 Subject * Victoria Hall - Disclosure of documents relate to refurbishment Full Name of Spokesperson and Name of Group or Person(s) being Represented (if applicable) * John Hartman Brief Summary of Issue or Purpose of Delegation * Question of process, timing, Hertitage Advisory Committee (HAC) Report related to Victoria Hall approval to proceed with restoration Have you been in contact with a Town staff or Council member regarding your matter of interest? * Yes No I acknowledge that the Procedure By-law permits five (5) minutes for Delegations. * Agree I acknowledge that I understand and accept the delegate conduct expectations as outlined in Section 32(b) of the Procedure By-law 6228-19, as amended (link below) * Agree Click to view Procedure By-law 6228-19, as amended.  Page 10 of 241 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Delegation Request This request and any written submissions or background information for consideration by either Council or Committees of Council is being submitted to Legislative Services. Council or Committee (Choose One) * Committee of the Whole Council or Committee Meeting Date *  2026-5-12 Subject * Pet Cemetery report. Full Name of Spokesperson and Name of Group or Person(s) being Represented (if applicable) * David Heard Brief Summary of Issue or Purpose of Delegation * Support for the education but not leaving offensive stones fully visible. Have you been in contact with a Town staff or Council member regarding your matter of interest? * Yes No Full name of the Town staff or Council member with whom you spoke Many Date you spoke with Town staff or a Council member 2026-5-13 I acknowledge that the Procedure By-law permits five (5) minutes for Delegations. * Agree I acknowledge that I understand and accept the delegate conduct expectations as outlined in Section 32(b) of the Procedure By-law 6228-19, as amended (link below) * Agree Click to view Procedure By-law 6228-19, as amended.   Page 11 of 241 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Delegation Request This request and any written submissions or background information for consideration by either Council or Committees of Council is being submitted to Legislative Services. Council or Committee (Choose One) * Committee of the Whole Council or Committee Meeting Date *  2026-5-12 Subject * Agenda Item 14.5 PDS26-049 - Applications for Official Plan Amendment , Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Amendment, of Subdivision, 1426 and 1452 Wellington Street East Full Name of Spokesperson and Name of Group or Person(s) being Represented (if applicable) * Leta Dayfoot Brief Summary of Issue or Purpose of Delegation * Perspective and Reasoning for a figure 8 road configuration for this development versus the proposed horseshoe road configuartion. To present concerns to the proposed changes of the previously approved site specific zoning for 30 Townhouses at 1452 Wellington and the current proposed Plan of subdivision which would include both properties of1452 and 1426 Wellington Street East Have you been in contact with a Town staff or Council member regarding your matter of interest? * Yes No Full name of the Town staff or Council member with whom you spoke Coucillors Wendy Gaertner, John Gallo, and Ron Weese Date you spoke with Town staff or a Council member 2026-5-9 I acknowledge that the Procedure By-law permits five (5) minutes for Delegations. * Agree I acknowledge that I understand and accept the delegate conduct expectations as outlined in Section 32(b) of the Procedure By-law 6228-19, as amended (link below) * Agree   Click to view Procedure By-law 6228-19, as amended. Page 12 of 241 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Delegation Request This request and any written submissions or background information for consideration by either Council or Committees of Council is being submitted to Legislative Services. Council or Committee (Choose One) * Committee of the Whole Council or Committee Meeting Date *  2026-5-12 Subject * Victoria Hall Full Name of Spokesperson and Name of Group or Person(s) being Represented (if applicable) * Linda Duringer Brief Summary of Issue or Purpose of Delegation * Design plans of Victoria Hall Have you been in contact with a Town staff or Council member regarding your matter of interest? * Yes No I acknowledge that the Procedure By-law permits five (5) minutes for Delegations. * Agree I acknowledge that I understand and accept the delegate conduct expectations as outlined in Section 32(b) of the Procedure By-law 6228-19, as amended (link below) * Agree Click to view Procedure By-law 6228-19, as amended.  Page 13 of 241 Town of Aurora Community Recognition Review Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes Date: Time: Location: Wednesday, April 8, 2026 10 a.m. Holland Room, Aurora Town Hall Committee Members: Mayor Tom Mrakas (Chair) Diane Buchanan Phiona Durrant Elaine Martini Jo-anne Spitzer Members Absent: Arif Faheem Khan Patricia Wallace (Vice Chair) Other Attendees: Shelley Ware, Supervisor, Special Events Linda Bottos, Council/Committee Coordinator _____________________________________________________________________ 1. Call to Order The Chair called the meeting to order at 10:12 a.m. 2. Land Acknowledgement The Committee acknowledged that the meeting took place on Anishinaabe lands, the traditional and treaty territory of the Chippewas of Georgina Island, recognizing the many other Nations whose presence here continues to this day, the special relationship the Chippewas have with the lands and waters of this territory, and that Aurora has shared responsibility for the stewardship of these lands and waters. It was noted that Aurora is part of the treaty lands of the Mississaugas and Chippewas, recognized through Treaty #13 and the Williams Treaties of 1923. Page 14 of 241 Community Recognition Review Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes April 8, 2026 2 3. Approval of the Agenda Moved By Phiona Durrant Seconded By Diane Buchanan That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved. Carried 4. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof Diane Buchanan declared a conflict of interest respecting the Community Leadership Award due to a business relationship with one of the nominees; therefore, did not participate in the discussion or vote on the Community Leadership Award. 5. Receipt of the Minutes 5.1 Community Recognition Review Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of February 11, 2026 Moved By Phiona Durrant Seconded By Elaine Martini 1. That the Community Recognition Review Advisory Committee meeting minutes of February 11, 2026, be received for information. Carried 6. Delegations None. 7. Matters for Consideration None. 8. Informational Items None. Page 15 of 241 Community Recognition Review Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes April 8, 2026 3 9. Closed Session Moved By Diane Buchanan Seconded By Jo-anne Spitzer That the Community Recognition Review Advisory Committee resolve into a Closed Session to consider the following matter: 1. 2026 Aurora Community Recognition Award Submissions and Selection of Award Recipients Personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees (Section 239(2)(b) of the Municipal Act, 2001)  Arts and Culture Award  Community Leadership Award  Community Safety Award  Good Business Award  Good Neighbour Award  Green Award  Heritage Award  Inclusivity Award  Older Adult Volunteer Award  Youth Volunteer Award Carried 9.1 2026 Aurora Community Recognition Award Submissions and Selection of Award Recipients Personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees (Section 239(2)(b) of the Municipal Act, 2001)  Arts and Culture Award  Community Leadership Award  Community Safety Award  Good Business Award  Good Neighbour Award  Green Award  Heritage Award  Inclusivity Award Page 16 of 241 Community Recognition Review Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes April 8, 2026 4  Older Adult Volunteer Award  Youth Volunteer Award Moved By Jo-anne Spitzer Seconded By Phiona Durrant 1. That the confidential memorandum regarding 2026 Aurora Community Recognition Award Submissions and Selection of Award Recipients be received; and 2. That the confidential direction to staff be confirmed. Carried 10. New Business Staff confirmed that the 2026 Community Recognition Awards Ceremony will be held in the Davide De Simone Performance Hall at Aurora Town Square, and the reception will be held in Brevik Hall. 11. Adjournment Moved By Diane Buchanan Seconded By Elaine Martini That the meeting be adjourned at 11:37 a.m. Carried Page 17 of 241 Town of Aurora Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes Date: Time: Location: Wednesday, April 8, 2026 7 p.m. Holland Room, Aurora Town Hall Committee Members: Councillor Wendy Gaertner, Chair (arrived 7:10 p.m.) Lois Davies Alison Hughes, Chair* John Lenchak* (arrived 7:02 p.m.) Elaine Martini Jo-anne Spitzer Marilyn Williams Other Attendees: Gregory Peri, Accessibility Advisor Anne Kantharajah, Town Clerk Julia Shipcott, Council/Committee Coordinator *Attended electronically _____________________________________________________________________ 1. Call to Order The Chair called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. 2. Land Acknowledgement The Committee acknowledged that the meeting took place on Anishinaabe lands, the traditional and treaty territory of the Chippewas of Georgina Island, recognizing the many other Nations whose presence here continues to this day, the special relationship the Chippewas have with the lands and waters of this territory, and that Aurora has shared responsibility for the stewardship of these lands and waters. It was noted that Aurora is part of the treaty lands of the Mississaugas and Chippewas, recognized through Treaty #13 and the Williams Treaties of 1923. 3. Approval of the Agenda Page 18 of 241 Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes April 8, 2026 2 Moved by Marilyn Williams Seconded by Jo-anne Spitzer That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved. Carried 4. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof There were no declarations of pecuniary interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M.50. 5. Receipt of the Minutes 5.1 Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of February 11, 2026 Moved by Elaine Martini Seconded by John Lenchak 1. That the Accessibility Advisory Committee meeting minutes of February 11, 2026, be received for information. Carried 6. Delegations 6.1 Amandipp Singh, Founder and CEO, Enabled Talent; Re: Accessibility Initiatives Amandipp Singh, CEO, Enabled Talent, presented a plan to promote coordinated initiatives between the Town of Aurora and local employers, educators, non-profit agencies, and accessibility advisory committees to identify primary challenges and further accessibility initiatives. Moved by John Lenchak Seconded by Marilyn Williams That the comments of the delegation be received for information. Carried 7. Matters for Consideration Page 19 of 241 Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes April 8, 2026 3 7.1 Memorandum from Town Clerk; Re: Draft 2026 Municipal Election Accessibility Plan Staff provided an extensive overview of the Draft 2026 Municipal Election Accessibility Plan, outlining accessibility features for both internet and ballot voting methods that will be provided at voting locations for candidates, electoral staff and voters, as well as accessibility training planned for election officials and accessible elections communications. Additionally, staff extended an invitation to the Committee for members to take part in voting location inspections; staff to provide upcoming events details. Staff further underscored the level of accessibility to be provided at advance polling stations. The Committee spoke to security concerns around internet voting, and provided the following suggestions when considering voting locations:  providing an alternative to school gyms with high ceilings, for those with hearing disabilities or neurodivergent individuals  propping heavy entrance doors open, or ensuring automatic door openers are working  use of plain language, ideally at a grade six to eight level, when providing instructions  providing service animal rest stations  providing respite seating, including non-rolling chairs with arms Moved by Marilyn Williams Seconded by Elaine Martini 1. That the memorandum regarding Draft 2026 Municipal Election Accessibility Plan be received; and 2. That the Accessibility Advisory Committee comments regarding the Draft 2026 Municipal Election Accessibility Plan be received and referred to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate. Carried 7.2 Round Table Discussion; Re: Town of Aurora Multi-Year Accessibility Plan 2022 to 2026 Page 20 of 241 Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes April 8, 2026 4 Staff provided an update of the 2022-2026 Multi-Year Accessibility Plan, specifically:  As Atkinson and Optimist Parks come due for replacement, feedback on inclusive features and accessible play elements may be provided via EngageAurora.ca/Playgrounds until Friday, April 10, 2026.  Town Hall parking lot refurbishment is on schedule, and the Aurora Seniors Association has been informed of the ensuing work, with a completion deadline for September, ahead of Municipal Elections.  May 24 - 30, 2026 will see multiple events celebrating National Accessibility Week happening throughout Aurora featuring speakers, drop-in events, and adaptability try-out activities. Moved by Councillor Gaertner Seconded by John Lenchak 1. That the Accessibility Advisory Committee comments regarding the Town of Aurora Multi-Year Accessibility Plan 2022 to 2026 be received and referred to staff for consideration and action as appropriate. Carried 8. Informational Items None. 9. New Business The Committee inquired on the status of acquiring additional evacuation chairs for use at the Town Square, and staff responded that due to state-of-the-art fire suppression features included in the new building, the consensus is that additional evacuation chairs are not required. However, fire safety plans for older buildings owned by the Town will be reviewed regarding the potential need for evacuation chairs in those locations. Staff noted a conversation with the Ministry of Seniors and Accessibility where it was discussed that the use of evacuation chairs is not required by Provincial legislation, affecting their utilization by many municipalities. Page 21 of 241 Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes April 8, 2026 5 10. Adjournment Moved by Lois Davies Seconded by Elaine Martini That the meeting be adjourned at 8 p.m. Carried Page 22 of 241 Town of Aurora Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes Date: Time: Location: Monday, April 13, 2026 7 p.m. Holland Room, Aurora Town Hall Committee Members: Councillor Wendy Gaertner (Chair) Cynthia Bettio Linda Duringer John Green, Aurora Historical Society Rep. (Vice Chair) Bob McRoberts, Honourary Member Rocco Morsillo Chris Polsinelli* Other Attendees: Mayor Tom Mrakas* Councillor John Gallo Councillor Ron Weese* Kyle Stitt, Manager, Facilities Andrea Vento, Program Manager, Facility Capital Projects Adam Robb, Manager, Policy Planning and Heritage Linda Bottos, Council/Committee Coordinator *Attended electronically _____________________________________________________________________ 1. Call to Order The Chair called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. The Committee consented to extend the hour to 9:15 p.m. 2. Land Acknowledgement The Committee acknowledged that the meeting took place on Anishinaabe lands, the traditional and treaty territory of the Chippewas of Georgina Island, recognizing the many other Nations whose presence here continues to this day, Page 23 of 241 Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes April 13, 2026 2 the special relationship the Chippewas have with the lands and waters of this territory, and that Aurora has shared responsibility for the stewardship of these lands and waters. It was noted that Aurora is part of the treaty lands of the Mississaugas and Chippewas, recognized through Treaty #13 and the Williams Treaties of 1923. 3. Approval of the Agenda Moved by Linda Duringer Seconded by Cynthia Bettio That the revised agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved. Carried 4. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof There were no declarations of pecuniary interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M.50. 5. Receipt of the Minutes 5.1 Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of February 9, 2026 Moved by Cynthia Bettio Seconded by Rocco Morsillo 1. That the Heritage Advisory Committee meeting minutes of February 9, 2026, be received for information. Carried 6. Delegations 6.1 Christopher Watts, The Aurora Heritage Authority; Re: Interpretive Plaques Christopher Watts expressed concerns regarding the Town’s guidelines and available information on interpretive plaques, noting the practices of other communities, and made suggestions for improvements. Moved by Rocco Morsillo Seconded by Bob McRoberts Page 24 of 241 Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes April 13, 2026 3 That the comments of the delegation be received for information. Carried 6.2 David Heard, Resident; Re: Heritage Events Report (Heritage Week) David Heard presented a proposal and requested assistance in launching the celebration of R.A.I.L. 175, the 175th anniversary of the arrival of rail service to Aurora in 1853, to be held mid-May to mid-June 2028, and to include events such as rail-themed music and costume festivals, exhibits and merchandise, an art contest and murals, rail excursions, and an expo. Moved by John Green Seconded by Bob McRoberts That the comments of the delegation be received for information. Carried 7. Matters for Consideration 7.1 Memorandum from Manager, Policy Planning and Heritage; Re: Heritage Permit Application HPA-2026-02 - Victoria Hall (27 Mosley Street) Staff provided a brief overview and introduced the heritage consultants, Ryan Giuricich, Project Principal, CS&P Architects; Joey Giaimo, Principal, Giaimo; and Sara Shemirani, Associate, Giaimo. The consultants presented an overview of the proposed alterations and refurbishments to Victoria Hall at 27 Mosley Street, and provided details on the site and context, building elevations, history and design, heritage attributes, exterior and interior conditions, proposed work, and potential impacts on heritage attributes. The Committee discussed various aspects including concerns with maintaining the heritage aspects, concerns with the compatibility and size of the proposed addition, purpose of the front room, the preference to maintain the existing front entrance, accessibility, metal and glass cladding of the addition versus matching the existing brickwork, gas meter location, washroom facilities location, preservation of the existing wainscoting, buttresses and rafters, the loss of two parking spaces from the Town Square parking lot, and intention of the flexible outdoor space. The Committee noted the challenge in determining the efficacy of the Page 25 of 241 Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes April 13, 2026 4 design while not knowing the end purpose and users of the building. The Committee was generally not in support of the proposed design. The consultants also provided further information on their design principles and general best practices being to maintain legibility and reversibility by designing the new addition as a product of its own time, and that a primary focus was to also make the building accessible. The consultants indicated that the proposed work had minimal levels of impact on the heritage features of the property. Moved by Rocco Morsillo Seconded by Linda Duringer 1. That the memorandum regarding Heritage Permit Application HPA- 2026-02 - Victoria Hall (27 Mosley Street) be received; and 2. That the Heritage Advisory Committee comments regarding Heritage Permit Application HPA-2026-02 - Victoria Hall (27 Mosley Street) be received and referred to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate. Carried 7.2 Memorandum from Manager, Policy Planning and Heritage; Re: Heritage Permit Application HPA-2026-01 - Revised Plans for 15375 Yonge Street Staff provided a brief overview of the memorandum and revised plans for alterations and demolition of a rear, non-heritage garage to facilitate the opening of a single-physician healthcare office on the designated property at 15375 Yonge Street, located within the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District. The owner provided further clarification on the proposal and affirmed their commitment to maintaining the heritage features of the property. The Committee expressed appreciation for the owner’s consideration of its previous feedback and was supportive of the revised application. Moved by Cynthia Bettio Seconded by Bob McRoberts 1. That the memorandum regarding Heritage Permit Application HPA- 2026-01 - Revised Plans for 15375 Yonge Street be received; and Page 26 of 241 Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes April 13, 2026 5 2. That the Heritage Advisory Committee comments regarding Heritage Permit Application HPA-2026-01 - Revised Plans for 15375 Yonge Street be received and referred to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate. Carried 7.3 Memorandum from Manager, Policy Planning and Heritage; Re: Summary of the 2026 Heritage Week Event Staff provided an overview of the memorandum and expressed appreciation to all those involved in the success of the 2026 Heritage Week Event. Staff highlighted the need for more dedicated resources and collaboration to ensure the ongoing long-term success of Heritage Week and other related events, noting that the leading of special events is generally beyond the scope and function of the Heritage Advisory Committee and planning and development services staff. The Committee and staff discussed possible ways and resources to support future Heritage Week events including the potential for Committee volunteers, sub-committees and community volunteers, possible use of the Heritage Reserve Fund and federal/provincial grant funding, and collaboration with other Town departments and partners. Consideration was given to possibly hold the event biennially if necessary, and to select a different theme for each event. Staff agreed to provide an update on any further resources and supports as they become available, and clarified that the Heritage Advisory Committee and planning/heritage staff can still participate and assist with events, but are limited in the ability to be the primary event management leads. Moved by Cynthia Bettio Seconded by Linda Duringer 1. That the memorandum regarding Summary of the 2026 Heritage Week Event be received; and 2. That the Heritage Advisory Committee comments regarding Summary of the 2026 Heritage Week Event be received and referred to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate. Carried Page 27 of 241 Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes April 13, 2026 6 8. Informational Items None. 9. New Business The Committee referred to the delegation regarding interpretive plaques and inquired about next steps. Staff provided a response noting they were open to meeting with the delegate and would consult with the Town’s GIS team to build further heritage mapping as necessary, using information that is publicly available. The Committee referred to the delegation regarding the proposed R.A.I.L. 175 celebration and discussed event management and funding options, and inquired about next steps. Staff provided a response noting that Council would need to approve any funding from the Heritage Reserve Fund through a member motion. The Committee inquired about plans for installation of Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District street signage, and staff provided a response noting this matter was actively being explored across relevant departments and through the Town’s ongoing wayfinding signage capital project. The Committee noted that 2026 is the 20th anniversary of the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District, which was designated in 2006. 10. Adjournment Moved by Linda Duringer Seconded by Cynthia Bettio That the meeting be adjourned at 9:14 p.m. Carried Page 28 of 241 Town of Aurora Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes Date: Time: Location: Thursday, April 16, 2026 7 p.m. Holland Room, Aurora Town Hall Committee Members: Councillor John Gallo (Chair) Councillor Ron Weese (Vice Chair) Nikki Alber Megan Bamford Judy Collins Lenard Lind William Newton, York Regional Police Representative Laura Schaffer Ian Smith Other Attendees: Andrew Poray, Manager, Economic Development James Gagnon, Bylaw Enforcement/Licensing Officer Daniel Ruberto, Deputy Town Clerk Julia Shipcott, Council/Committee Coordinator _____________________________________________________________________ 1. Call to Order The Chair called the meeting to order at 6:59 p.m. 2. Land Acknowledgement The Task Force acknowledged that the meeting took place on Anishinaabe lands, the traditional and treaty territory of the Chippewas of Georgina Island, recognizing the many other Nations whose presence here continues to this day, the special relationship the Chippewas have with the lands and waters of this territory, and that Aurora has shared responsibility for the stewardship of these lands and waters. It was noted that Aurora is part of the treaty lands of the Mississaugas and Chippewas, recognized through Treaty #13 and the Williams Treaties of 1923. Page 29 of 241 Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes April 16, 2026 2 3. Approval of the Agenda Moved by Councillor Ron Weese Seconded by Nikki Alber That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved. Carried 4. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof There were no declarations of pecuniary interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M.50. 5. Receipt of the Minutes 5.1 Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes of February 19, 2026 Moved by Nikki Alber Seconded by Laura Schaffer 1. That the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force meeting minutes of February 19, 2026, be received for information. Carried 6. Delegations None. 7. Matters for Consideration 7.1 Memorandum from Director of Corporate Services/Town Solicitor; Re: Review of Cannabis Retail Stores The Task Force acknowledged a disconnect between complaint/offence data provided and known community safety issues that were not captured within the existing reports. The Task Force requested an update to the October 24, 2023 Council Resolution sent to the Province regarding Motion 10.1 - Councillor Kim; Re: Cannabis Retail Applications for the Town of Aurora, and staff agreed to follow up. Page 30 of 241 Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes April 16, 2026 3 Staff will confirm departmental responsibility for preparing the final report, with recommendations provided by the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force, and will confer with the Communications Department on the feasibility of completing a survey prior to the next meeting. The Task Force provided the following suggestions, including:  generating a survey for distribution to properties neighbouring cannabis retail stores, with results submitted at the next and final meeting;  providing a copy of the Task Force's final report to Ontario municipalities and the Premier's office;  providing to the public various reporting opportunities available through the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO), Town By-law department and York Region Police (YRP);  increasing frequent patrols by By-law Services and YRP, targeting areas of concern;  advocating to the Province to allow re-zoning by the Town, re- evaluating the formula for future cannabis retail stores within the Town, and reducing the hours for locations within residential neighbourhoods;  creation of a nuisance by-law which would include limiting the number of nuisance calls to a property;  gathering best-practices from other municipalities on handling compliance issues;  staff providing an update on the use of approximately $80,000 of Provincial funding ear-marked for enforcement issues, and applying those funds to Community Service/Paid Duty officers to patrol areas of concern;  inviting AGCO representatives to the next Cannabis Retail Review Task Force meeting to provide potential compliance solutions;  distributing door-hanger surveys within 200 metres of cannabis retail stores to gather feedback on areas of concern; Page 31 of 241 Cannabis Retail Review Task Force Meeting Minutes April 16, 2026 4 Moved by Judy Collins Seconded by William Newton 1. That the memorandum regarding Review of Cannabis Retail Stores be received; and 2. That the Cannabis Retail Review Task Force comments regarding Review of Cannabis Retail Stores be received and referred to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate. Carried 8. Informational Items None. 9. New Business None. 10. Adjournment Moved by Megan Bamford Seconded by Laura Schaffer That the meeting be adjourned at 8 p.m. Carried Page 32 of 241 Town of Aurora Environmental Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes Date: Time: Location: Monday, April 20, 2026 7 p.m. Holland Room, Aurora Town Hall Committee Members: Ron Weese (Chair) Victor Carvalho Shun Chen* Jason Cheng Angela Daust Leta Dayfoot* Alain Godin Denis Heng Ken Turriff (arrived at 7:05 p.m.) Other Attendees: Councillor Wendy Gaertner* (arrived at 7:05 p.m.) Will Stover, Analyst, Energy and Climate Change Natalie Kehle, Program Manager, Energy and Environment Dan Naccarato, Manager, Public Works Amanda Cutler, Coordinator, Waste/Recycling Julia Shipcott, Council/Committee Coordinator *Attended electronically _____________________________________________________________________ 1. Call to Order The Chair called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. 2. Land Acknowledgement The Committee acknowledged that the meeting took place on Anishinaabe lands, the traditional and treaty territory of the Chippewas of Georgina Island, recognizing the many other Nations whose presence here continues to this day, the special relationship the Chippewas have with the lands and waters of this territory, and that Aurora has shared responsibility for the stewardship of these lands and waters. It was noted that Aurora is part of the treaty lands of the Page 33 of 241 Environmental Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes April 20, 2026 2 Mississaugas and Chippewas, recognized through Treaty #13 and the Williams Treaties of 1923. 3. Approval of the Agenda Moved by Angela Daust Seconded by Alain Godin That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved. Carried 4. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof There were no declarations of pecuniary interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M.50. 5. Receipt of the Minutes 5.1 Environmental Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of February 23, 2026 Moved by Victor Carvalho Seconded by Leta Dayfoot 1. That the Environmental Advisory Committee meeting minutes of February 23, 2026, be received for information. Carried 6. Delegations None. 7. Matters for Consideration 7.1 Memorandum from Program Manager, Energy and Environment; Re: Corporate Waste Audit and Reduction Plan Update Staff provided a brief overview of the Town's first Corporate Waste Audit which will be used as a baseline to build the Town's Waste Reduction Plan, and introduced Katie McMillan, Manager of Waste Analytics and Development, AET Group Inc. Page 34 of 241 Environmental Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes April 20, 2026 3 Katie presented the key objectives of the project consisting of auditing 15 waste locations including five Town facilities, nine park/trail bin locations and one public event. Detailed audit results for garbage, recycling, and organics disposal, as well as diversion and capture rates were provided, in addition to providing cost-savings solutions and feasible reduction strategies to improve implementation and reduce waste contamination. The following suggestions were provided to the Committee:  maintaining ongoing waste audits every one-three years, using repeated methodologies in order to compare results  continuing with existing initiatives to manage dog waste  implementing on-site monitoring and provide internal escalation framework  following the waste hierarchy of reducing, repairing, refurbishing, recycling, and energy recovery  enhancing education and signage initiatives The Committee suggested providing tri-sort recycling bins in all Town public facility locations, increasing the number of dog waste bins in parks and trails, enhancing signage at receptacles to educate users on the consequences of cross-contamination, generating a waste-diversion challenge between municipalities, partnering with local schools to generate a waste diversion curriculum, and removing garbage receptacles from public facilities entirely to ensure visitors take their garbage home. Regarding public events, and the Aurora Rib Fest in particular, the Committee suggested providing additional volunteers to assist with waste sorting and placing responsibility on vendors to separate their own waste. Staff noted that some Town facilities, due to historical contamination rates, have been refused servicing of organic and recycling streams by the contractor. Staff are looking to align future contracts more closely with residential contracts. Staff added that sourcing enough volunteers to staff the full length of Aurora Rib Fest has proven challenging in the past. Page 35 of 241 Environmental Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes April 20, 2026 4 Moved by Ken Turriff Seconded by Leta Dayfoot 1. That the memorandum regarding Corporate Waste Audit and Reduction Plan Update be received; and 2. That the Environmental Advisory Committee comments regarding Corporate Waste Audit and Reduction Plan Update be received and referred to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate. Carried 7.2 Memorandum from Manager, Public Works; Re: Waste Program and Recycling Update Staff provided an extensive overview of the Waste Program which included key waste initiatives, current education programs, community events and pilot programs planned throughout the year, and outlined the distribution of responsibility between Circular Materials, GFL Environmental Inc. and the Town. Staff reported positive five-year solid waste and green bin results. Additionally, staff spoke to results of the Public Information Centre and survey which occurred in the fall of 2025, outlined waste management services provided under the current contract and opportunities for enhancing the new waste collection contract. Staff added that York Region’s annual recycling audits shortly will be provided shortly and parameters will remain consistent for year-over-year comparisons. Staff will commence updates to the Waste By-law to reflect all recent changes next term. The Committee inquired whether there will be any budget efficiencies realized with Circular Materials and suggested increasing corporate green bin diversion rates within the Waste Program, in addition to improving resident education on waste solutions to outline benefits of involvement. The Committee noted inconsistencies contained in three different recycling apps provided to residents by Recycle Coach, Circular Materials and York Region, and staff provided assurance that all inconsistencies will be reviewed and best efforts made to rectify them. Page 36 of 241 Environmental Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes April 20, 2026 5 Moved by Alain Godin Seconded by Leta Dayfoot 1. That the memorandum regarding Waste Program and Recycling Update be received; and 2. That the Environmental Advisory Committee comments regarding Waste Program and Recycling Update be received and referred to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate. Carried 8. Informational Items None. 9. New Business The Committee inquired into the funding request on tree canopy research; staff will forward the request to the appropriate department. The Committee discussed opportunities to become involved in additional initiatives surrounding Earth Week in conjunction with other communities, and staff provided an overview of the Town’s acknowledgements of Earth Week 2026 including an anti- idling campaign and providing free EV charging at all municipal Level -2 stations. The Committee acknowledged concern regarding the province's repealing of the Endangered Species Act, 2007 as well as consolidating its 36 existing conservation authorities (CAs) into nine regional entities, the result of which would see the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority merge with multiple other CAs. 10. Adjournment Moved by Jason Cheng Seconded by Angela Daust That the meeting be adjourned at 8:54 p.m. Carried Page 37 of 241 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Town of Aurora Committee of the Whole Report No. CMS 2 6 -0 12 Subject: Aurora Town Square Shade Structures Prepared by: Phil Rose, Manager, Cultural Services Department: Community Services Date: May 12, 2026 Recommendation 1. That Report No. CMS26-012 be received; and 2. That the condition on the approval of and budget authority for Capital Project No. GN- F-0106 – Aurora Town Square Sail Shade Structure in the amount of $150,000 be lifted, and the project be approved. Executive Summary This report provides a summary of outdoor shade solutions for Aurora Town Square, including preliminary pricing, estimated lifecycle, seasonal labour needs for sail installation and removal, and storage requirements.  As summers become increasingly marked by extreme heat and higher exposure to ultraviolet radiation, shaded public spaces like Mirkopoulos Plateia at Aurora Town Square take on a greater role as valuable community amenities.  Based on the shadow studies completed by RAW Design and the nature of current and proposed outdoor programming, staff have identified two locations where shade is needed most: over the amphitheatre and within the square. Background At a Special Meeting of Council on November 17, 2025, Council passed the following resolution: 1. That Project GN-F-0106: Aurora Town Square Sail Shade Structures be paused for further analysis; and Page 38 of 241 May 12, 2026 2 of 8 Report No. CMS26-012 2. That staff report back with more information for Council to consider:  Alternative shade solutions, including portable, modular, or temporary structures; and  A comparison of capital cost, lifecycle cost, seasonal labour, storage needs, and functional effectiveness. Analysis As summers become increasingly marked by extreme heat and higher exposure to ultraviolet radiation, shaded public spaces like Mirkopoulos Plateia at Aurora Town Square take on a greater role as valuable community amenities. Mirkopoulos Plateia (Outdoor Square) at Aurora Town Square (ATS) currently lacks adequate natural shade from the tree canopy, making it difficult to program this space during peak summer hours. The shadow studies undertaken in May 2019 (Attachment 1) show that there is consistent sun exposure in the Mirkopoulos Plateia in late June from 11:00 a.m. until after 6:00 p.m., when the sun begins to set below the Aurora Public Library to the west. These sunny conditions persist into late September. Shade structures would keep this area significantly cooler, thereby encouraging higher and longer usage of ATS for the benefit of the community. The goal is to make the outdoor space as adaptable as possible so that it can host multiple programs throughout the year by combining natural shade from the tree canopy with built structures to provide long-term sustainability and protection. Staff are proposing the installation of 2 permanent shade structures to provide protection from sun exposure, mitigate the heat island effect, reduce heat-related health impacts, and increase the overall usability of Mirkopoulos Plateia. The short-term objective is to activate Mirkopoulos Plateia for at least 10 performances annually, plus 5 special events, including Multicultural Festival, Doors Open, Fall Faves Festival, Christmas Market, and Family First Night. Longer term, staff predict that the use of the outdoor space will steadily increase as it becomes established as an event and programming venue. Staff also predict that the addition of permanent shaded areas within the outdoor space would make it more attractive to community organizers that wish to rent it for various events. Performance measurement would be monitored through increased number of programs, attendance, and booking revenue. Page 39 of 241 May 12, 2026 3 of 8 Report No. CMS26-012 Based on the shadow studies completed by RAW Design and the nature of current and proposed outdoor programming, staff have identified two locations where shade is needed most: over the amphitheatre and within the square. Figure 1: Proposed Shade Structure Locations Portable, pop-up tents will continue to be deployed during events, however, they have a limited use, are labour intensive to set up and take down, are not as durable as the proposed sail structures, and are unable to provide adequate shade cover for large gatherings, especially over the raked amphitheatre seating. As such, staff recommend a permanent, tailored solution, to address shade needs at ATS, such as the sail structures proposed in this report. The following table identifies shade options for both the square (Panels 1, 2 and 2A) and the amphitheatre (3A and B and 4A, B and C). Both shade structures are intended to be permanent with only the shade sails removed seasonally. Preliminary costs indicated are for information and initial design study costing purposes only. Final costs will be confirmed through the later stage detail design process and external cost solicitation. Also worth noting is that the concepts provided in Attachment 2 have been provided by suppliers the Town has worked with on previous projects but would need to be scaled appropriately for ATS. Page 40 of 241 May 12, 2026 4 of 8 Report No. CMS26-012 Shade Structure Concepts (also refer to Attachment 2) Panel Description Preliminary Pricing Seasonal Requirements 1 Curved fabric canopy with high- density sails supported by arched steel beams. This style provides shelter for entertainers without blocking views from the amphitheatre and café patio, however the view from the bridge would be restricted. This shade structure provides shelter for entertainers without blocking views from the amphitheatre, café patio, and bridge. Shade sail warranty is 10 years and 2 years for the beams and posts. $75,000 for the shade sail portion only. The customized stone- and-concrete stage is not in scope and would be extra, with the price to be determined based on design. Fabrics can be easily removed for winter storage or extreme weather conditions. Approximately a half day or 3.5 hours for staff to install or remove the sails, for a total of 7 hours of staff time annually. 2 and 2A Tensile membrane shade structure composed of multiple overlapping fabric panels designed for UV resistance, weather durability, and tension performance. The canopy is supported by inclined cylindrical steel columns that counteract tensile forces exerted by the stretched fabric. This shade structure also provides shelter for entertainers without blocking views from the amphitheatre, café patio, and bridge. $25,000 for 22’ x 12’ shade sail with 4 posts. Fabrics can be easily removed for winter storage or extreme weather conditions. Approximately a half day or 3.5 hours for staff to install or remove the sails, for a total of 7 hours of staff time annually. Page 41 of 241 May 12, 2026 5 of 8 Report No. CMS26-012 Panel Description Preliminary Pricing Seasonal Requirements Shade sail warranty is 10 years and 2 years for the beams and posts. 3A and B Large canopy structure for amphitheatre gathering area with tensile members in a radial structural configuration that allows the canopy to span a large area with minimal vertical supports, preserving unobstructed space below. The canopy is composed of several triangular or trapezoidal fabric panels, each tensioned independently. Shade sail warranty is 10 years and 2 years for the beams and posts. $125,000 dependent on design Fabrics can be easily removed for winter storage or extreme weather conditions. Approximately a full day or 7 hours for staff to install or remove the sails, for a total of 14 hours of staff time annually. 4A, B and C Cantilevered tensile canopy supported by a single, robust steel frame for over the amphitheatre seating area. The canopy surface is composed of a tense, multilayered fabric membrane shaped for rainwater runoff, wind load mitigation, and tension stability. The structure has minimal visual clutter and employs a reinforced concrete foundation designed to counteract bending and uplift forces. Shade sail warranty is 10 years and 2 years for the beams and posts. $100,000 dependent on design Fabrics can be easily removed for winter storage or extreme weather conditions. Approximately a full day or 7 hours for staff to install or remove the sails, for a total of 14 hours of staff time annually. Page 42 of 241 May 12, 2026 6 of 8 Report No. CMS26-012 Based on the $150,000 budget, staff recommend design concept Panel 2 for the square to accommodate entertainers and Panel 4 for the amphitheatre to accommodate the public. Advisory Committee Review None Legal Considerations As the owner and operator, the Town has a duty under the Occupiers’ Liability Act to take reasonable steps to ensure that users of Aurora Town Square are reasonably safe. The installation of shade structures supports this obligation by helping to mitigate foreseeable risks associated with heat exposure and ultraviolet radiation, particularly as extreme weather events become more frequent. There are also operational and liability considerations associated with the installation, maintenance, and seasonal removal of shade structures, including risks related to structural integrity, weather (e.g., high winds), and public interaction. These risks can be mitigated through appropriate design, engineering, inspection, and maintenance practices. Financial Implications Should Council approve staff’s recommended options, the total estimated cost for the two shade structures is approximately $125,000 plus minimal design costs. The previously conditionally approved capital budget authority of $150,000 under project no. GN-F-0106 should be sufficient to enable the recommended shade options to proceed. If Council is supportive of staff’s proposed ATS shade options, it is recommended that the conditions on the approval of and budget authority for Capital Project No. GN-F- 0106 in the amount of $150,000 be lifted and this project be allowed to proceed. This capital budget authority will continue to be funded fully from the Growth & New reserve as was originally proposed. Upon Council’s lifting of the condition on the approval of this project, an official project number will be issued for this project under which it will be identified moving forward. Page 43 of 241 May 12, 2026 7 of 8 Report No. CMS26-012 Communications Considerations There are no communications considerations as a result of this report. Climate Change Considerations The recommendations from this report will increase the Town’s ability to adapt to a changing climate and supports the goals under the Town’s Climate Change Adaptation Plan. Shade structures in the Town’s downtown community space supports climate adaptation by reducing heat exposure and improves comfort during increasingly frequent hot weather. This encourages social activities and protects vulnerable populations from heat stress. The Federal Government of Canada’s Environment and Climate Change forecasts 2026 to be among the hottest years on record, breaking 2023 and 2024 record highs. The recommendations from this report does not impact greenhouse gas emissions. Link to Strategic Plan Aurora Town Square supports the following Strategic Plan goals and key objectives: Supporting an exceptional quality of life for all in its accomplishment in satisfying requirements in the following key objectives within these goal statements:  Celebrating and promoting our culture  Strengthening the fabric of our community  Encouraging an active and healthy lifestyle Alternative(s) to the Recommendation 1. Council may provide further direction. 2. That staff continue to utilize portable canopies for Aurora Town Square shade needs. Page 44 of 241 May 12, 2026 8 of 8 Report No. CMS26-012 Conclusion Installing shade structures at ATS is a proactive public health initiative that provides immediate community benefits and maximizes outdoor programming opportunities at Aurora Town Square. The addition of shade structures would result in a noticeable increase of outdoor activations available to residents and visitors and make the space more attractive as a rentable amenity, thereby generating additional revenue for the Town. This investment would also have a transformative impact on public space in the downtown neighbourhood, turning this area into an even more vibrant, diverse and unique cultural destination. Attachments Attachment 1 – Shadow Studies, Aurora Library Square with Bridge, May 2019 Attachment 2 – Aurora Town Square Shade Structure Concept Ideas Previous Reports None Pre-submission Review Agenda Management Team review on April 23, 2026 Approvals Approved by Robin McDougall, Director, Community Services Approved by Doug Nadorozny, Chief Administrative Officer Page 45 of 241 SHADOW STUDIESAURORA LIBRARY SQUARE WITH BRIDGEAURORA, ONTARIODATE 10 MAY 2019405-317 ADELAIDE STREET WESTTORONTO CANADA M5V 1P9+1 416 599 9729WWW. RAWDESIGN.CA%XXEGLQIRXXS6ITSVX'17Page 46 of 241 09:18AM10:18AMMARCH 21Page 47 of 241 11:18AM12:18PMMARCH 21Page 48 of 241 01:18PM02:18PMMARCH 21Page 49 of 241 03:18PM04:18PMMARCH 21Page 50 of 241 05:18PM06:18PMMARCH 21Page 51 of 241 09:18AM10:18AMJUNE 21Page 52 of 241 11:18AM12:18PMJUNE 21Page 53 of 241 01:18PM02:18PMJUNE 21Page 54 of 241 03:18PM04:18PMJUNE 21Page 55 of 241 05:18PM06:18PMJUNE 21Page 56 of 241 %XXEGLQIRXXS'17Page 57 of 241 Page 58 of 241 %Page 59 of 241 Page 60 of 241 Page 61 of 241 Page 62 of 241 Page 63 of 241 Page 64 of 241 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Town of Aurora Committee of the Whole Report No. CMS 2 6 -013 Subject: Happy Woodland Pet Cemetery Monument Alteration Plan Prepared by: Michelle Johnson, Collection and Exhibitions Coordinator Department: Community Services Date: May 12, 2026 Recommendation 1. That Report No. CMS26-013 be received; and 2. That Council endorse a case-by-case approach to addressing racially offensive language on monuments within the Happy Woodland Pet Cemetery, including: a. Retention of three monuments located in their original historic positions, supported by enhanced interpretation and educational materials; b. Documented removal and storage of two monuments previously displaced from their original locations; and c. Retention of one severely damaged monument in its current condition, without reconstruction or replication of the original offensive inscription as documented in archival records. Executive Summary This report provides Council with a summary of consultation findings and research regarding the offensive language that appears on historic monuments at the Happy Woodland Pet Cemetery.  The Happy Woodland Pet Cemetery contains six monuments with racially offensive language  A review of industry practice, procedures, and responses to offensive language in historic contexts has been completed Page 65 of 241 May 12, 2026 2 of 9 Report No. CMS26-013  Staff consulted with local schoolboards regarding concerns about student exposure to offensive language during potential on-site field trips  Coconut Village Elevate Consulting (CVEC) led an in-depth consultation process that included participants from local Black and allied communities, which revealed a strong desire to retain the original language  Staff identify value in considering a case-by-case approach to addressing the offensive language on the monuments  The CVEC consultation identified the importance of reparative investment in the Black community, which will be explored by staff and brought back to Council as part of the budget process.  Staff identify meaningful risks and limitations associated with all potential solutions Background The Happy Woodland Pet Cemetery is a municipally designated heritage property under the Ontario Heritage Act, designated in 2023 through By‑law No. 6520‑23 in recognition of its significance as the first pet cemetery in Canada. Dedicated in 1934, the site was formally opened to the public for pet burials and remained in operation until 1978. During that period, more than 800 named pets were interred, resulting in a varied collection of commemorative gravestones and markers situated within a naturalized, forested landscape. The designation by‑law identifies the monuments and their woodland setting as key heritage attributes requiring protection and careful stewardship. In March 2025, Council considered a staff report seeking approval for proposed alterations under a heritage permit; that permit remains open. Since that time, staff have undertaken additional research and consultation related to concerns about certain potentially offensive gravestones within the cemetery. This report summarizes the work completed to date and presents Council with options for a potential pathway forward. Page 66 of 241 May 12, 2026 3 of 9 Report No. CMS26-013 Analysis The Happy Woodland Pet Cemetery contains six monuments with racially offensive language During the restoration and research of the Happy Woodland Pet Cemetery, staff have encountered six instances of racially offensive language inscribed on historic monuments. The language appears as the name of the pet that was buried on site. These monuments are listed below, with their unique internal catalogue number, and when known, are followed by pet name, family name, species, year of birth, year of death, and age: 1. A2-2, “N*****” Breen, Pony, born 1914, died 1959, age 47 years. 2. A5-48, “N*****” Sharpe, age 13 years 3. A6-61, “N*****” Ridout, born 1930, died 1942 4. B1-55, “N*****” 5. C4-44, “N*****” Sears, age 15 years. 6. C5-13, “N*****” Taylor Of the six monuments, three were uncovered in their original location (A2-2, C4-44, B1- 55), two were uncovered within a collection of 140 monuments that had been previously re-located (A5-48, A6-61), and one is severely damaged with only a fragment remaining (C5-13). The presence of offensive language at the site does not define its full history, which encompasses multiple narratives, experiences, and periods of significance. A review of industry practice, procedures, and responses to offensive language in historic contexts has been completed The annotated bibliography prepared for this report (Attachment 1) demonstrates that there is no single prescribed approach to addressing racially offensive language in heritage contexts; rather, museums, archives and heritage professionals apply a range of strategies depending on context, significance, and audience. Some sources choose to retain offensive language in place and address it through clear contextual interpretation, emphasizing that its presence reflects historical nuance rather than endorsement. There are also many examples that demonstrate modifying, replacing, or removing inscriptions, particularly where language continues to cause harm or distracts from the intended commemorative purpose. Across all approaches, common themes include transparency, consultation, and a clear institutional stance that distinguishes acknowledgement of the past from contemporary values. Page 67 of 241 May 12, 2026 4 of 9 Report No. CMS26-013 Staff consulted with local schoolboards regarding concerns about student exposure to offensive language during potential on-site field trips Staff consulted with representatives from the York Region District School Board and the York Region Catholic District School Board. Both expressed significant concern about the presence of racially offensive language on monuments and emphasized the potential harm such language poses to student wellbeing. Representatives from both boards indicated that if offensive language remains visible, the boards would be unlikely to support or permit on-site student field trips to the Happy Woodland Pet Cemetery. It was noted that within school settings, the use of materials containing racial slurs is governed by structured text-selection policies that assess age appropriateness, educational purpose, and potential harm. Both boards emphasized that, under their policies, there is zero tolerance for the repetition or casual exposure to racial slurs, recognizing that even seeing such language can cause harm regardless of intent or context. To ensure broad and meaningful access to this historic site, staff will continue working with local schoolboards and community organizations to co-develop culturally sensitive, curriculum-aligned facilitated learning opportunities. Coconut Village Elevate Consulting (CVEC) led an in-depth consultation process that included participants from local Black and allied communities, which revealed a strong desire to retain the original language Consultation took place from December 2025 to April 2026 in the form of round-table sessions, small in-person group discussions, virtual discussions, and one-on-one conversations. The consultation process involved a diverse and multidisciplinary group of participants, intentionally reflecting both professional expertise and lived experience. Contributors included approximately 50 individuals from the legal sector, law enforcement, education, healthcare, psychotherapy, advocacy, entrepreneurship, and community development. The process also centred intergenerational perspectives, bringing together the knowledge and historical insight of Black elders alongside the voices and lived realities of youth and students. Participants represented both Black and allied communities, ensuring a breadth of perspectives grounded in cultural competency, equity, and community accountability. The consultant distinguished between a reactive and a transformative approach to addressing racially offensive content. A reactive model focuses on removal or obscuring language as a site-based, cosmetic response, that requires minimal financial Page 68 of 241 May 12, 2026 5 of 9 Report No. CMS26-013 or community investment. In contrast, a transformative model is centred on community-led planning and structural change, with the goal of building trust and sustaining long-term inclusion. Within this framework, three pathways forward were provided for consideration. Option #1: Interpretive Preservation and Education-Focused Approach Maintain the cemetery in its current physical state, including the retention of existing offensive language on monuments, while enhancing interpretation, education, and public understanding through clear, accessible learning tools. Option #2: Designated Cultural Space, Public Art, and Legacy Investment Approach Preserve the cemetery in its current physical condition, with existing offensive language remaining in place, while advancing a cultural recognition approach that includes a designated on‑site cultural space and complementary town‑wide public art and storytelling initiative. Option #3: Conditional Removal or Alteration with Reparative Investment Framework Removal or alteration of monuments through a clear, accountable framework that prioritizes careful documentation, respect for the site’s heritage, and meaningful community consent. Under this approach, removal needs to be accompanied by immediate corresponding reparative investment, ensuring that interventions are linked to tangible measures that acknowledge harm and support longer‑term community benefit. Consultation participants noted that retaining the historic markers does not negate the pain or discomfort associated with the language but can create opportunities for reflection and education. While some participants leaned toward removal, they indicated that they would accept either approach, reflecting an understanding of the complexity of the issue. Staff identify value in considering a case-by-case approach to addressing the offensive language on the monuments A case-by-case approach to addressing the racially offensive language should be considered, rather than a single uniform solution. This enables the Town to balance heritage conservation and harm-reduction principles, with community and stakeholder perspectives. It also provides Council with flexibility in determining a pathway forward that is sensitive to both historical significance and contemporary values. Page 69 of 241 May 12, 2026 6 of 9 Report No. CMS26-013 Based on consultation, the three monuments (A2-2, C4-44, B1-55) that were uncovered in their original historic location should remain as-is, unaltered, with the implementation of interpretation and education recommendations outlined in Option #1 above. The two monuments (A5-48, A6-61) that were already displaced from their original location and recovered from the collection of approximately 140 monuments should be removed and placed in storage. The removal would be documented, and the monuments would be placed within the Aurora Museum & Archives Collection Storage Area. On-site acknowledgment of their existence and the decision to remove them will be developed along with responsible interpretation and ongoing public education. One monument (C5-13) is severely damaged and over half of it was removed from the site prior to town restoration commencing. The portion on site has no offensive language present, however during research staff uncovered a newspaper article and photograph that depicted the monument in its complete form. This documentation revealed racially offensive language, and the recommendation is to leave the monument as is and not reproduce the in-tact monument as shown in archival documentation. The CVEC consultation identified the importance of reparative investment in the Black community, which will be explored by staff and brought back to Council as part of the budget process. All options presented by CVEC recommended the establishment of a community investment fund. The consultation process recognized the Town’s established practice of investing in and stewarding its historic assets and identified an opportunity to apply a similar level of intention and investment toward the lived experiences and histories of communities affected by that legacy. The fund is described by CVEC as a mechanism to respond to the impacts and considerations associated with the offensive language at the Happy Woodland Pet Cemetery. The concept was framed to pair decisions about the site with broader educational, cultural, and community-led initiatives related to Black history and lived experience. The consultant noted that such a fund could support both time-limited activities, such as workshops, speaker series, and public learning opportunities, as well as longer-term investments in cultural programming, artist commissions, and community-driven initiatives. Staff recognize the importance of parallel investment in the Black community alongside the restoration and development of the historic Happy Woodland Pet Cemetery and will Page 70 of 241 May 12, 2026 7 of 9 Report No. CMS26-013 continue to research the process and report back to Council, including any budgetary impacts. Staff identify risks and limitations associated with all potential solutions Given the presence of offensive language, monuments left unchanged face an increased risk of damage, theft, vandalism, or unsanctioned reinterpretation. Staff recognize there isn’t a pathway forward that fully eliminates harm. Retaining the monuments in their current state would result in continued public exposure to offensive language and could limit the site’s suitability for public school programming. Staff will continue to consult with the schoolboard to find appropriate ways to access the history of the site. Another risk is how this decision is framed and represented in the larger conversation about Aurora. Consultation findings indicate that a reactive approach focused on removing all instances of offensive language may carry unintended risks, particularly for members of the Black community who do not support the removal or censoring of this aspect of local Black history. Participants noted that removal without consent or immediate reparative support could be experienced as erasure, underscoring the need to carefully consider how different approaches may affect communities in distinct ways. Staff acknowledge the need to carefully balance these considerations in evaluating potential pathways forward. Advisory Committee Review Heritage Permit Application HPA-2025-01 was presented to the Heritage Advisory Committee for review on February 3, 2025, detailing the restoration efforts to the Happy Woodland Pet Cemetery, including pathway reconstruction, monument relocation, and landscaping. Council approved these restoration efforts but directed staff to continue exploring options for addressing monuments with offensive language and report back to Council. The Heritage Advisory Committee expressed comments that the offensive monuments and language remain “as-is”, with appropriate disclaimer signage and interpretive learning information provided to indicate that the monuments are a product of their respective time, and not reflective of current values. Once Council provides direction regarding the course of action for the offensive monuments the heritage permit application itself will be considered completed from a file maintenance/technical approval perspective, but further consultation with the HAC can still occur as the project and its detailed design work advances. Page 71 of 241 May 12, 2026 8 of 9 Report No. CMS26-013 Legal Considerations The Happy Woodland Pet Cemetery is a designated heritage property under the Ontario Heritage Act. Any removal, alteration, or relocation of monuments requires Council approval and must be consistent with the heritage process. If provided by the Town, any interpretive, educational, or programming materials must be developed and delivered in a manner consistent with the Town’s obligations under the Ontario Human Rights Code. Financial Implications Any monument restoration work will be completed under the Town’s existing approved capital project No. AM-0203 – Pet Cemetery Restoration with a current budget authority of $118,400. Of this amount, approximately $40,000 remains unspent. Communications Considerations There are no specific communications actions required as a result of this report. Staff will continue to work collaboratively to ensure appropriate information is provided on-site and, where applicable, through Town communication channels as next steps are implemented. Climate Change Considerations The restoration of the Pet Cemetery will involve sensitive protection and enhancement of landscape elements to further preserve the natural forested setting of the area. Link to Strategic Plan The conservation of heritage resources supports the Strategic Plan goal of Supporting an Exceptional Quality of Life for All through its accomplishment in satisfying the requirements under Celebrating and Promoting our Culture. Alternative(s) to the Recommendation 1. That all monuments containing offensive language be removed. 2. That all monuments containing offensive language remain as-is. Page 72 of 241 May 12, 2026 9 of 9 Report No. CMS26-013 3. That Council provide further direction. Conclusions This report summarizes the research and consultation undertaken to address the presence of racially offensive language on six monuments at the Happy Woodland Pet Cemetery. Staff reviewed industry practices, consulted with local school boards, and engaged CVEC to gather perspectives from Black and allied community members. The findings indicate differing viewpoints, identified risks and limitations across all pathways, and support consideration of a case-by-case approach to decision-making. Ultimately, the site should be understood not solely through the presence of offensive language, but through the wider and more complex histories it continues to reveal and invite reflection upon. Attachments 1. Attachment #1 – Annotated Bibliography Previous Reports PDS25-030, Heritage Permit Application HPA-2025-01 Happy Woodland Pet Cemetery, March 4, 2025 Heritage Advisory Committee Memorandum dated February 3, 2025. Pre-submission Review Agenda Management Team review on April 23, 2026 Approvals Approved by Robin McDougall, Director, Community Services Approved by Doug Nadorozny, Chief Administrative Officer Page 73 of 241 Attachment 1 to Report No. CMS26-013 – Annotated Bibliography 1 Annotated Bibliography: Addressing Racially Offensive Language, Artifacts and Figures in Heritage Contexts This annotated bibliography compiles museum, academic, and media sources that document how racially offensive language has been addressed in heritage, cemetery, and memorial contexts. The sources demonstrate a range of approaches including contextualization, renaming, replacement, removal, consultation, and archival retention. Each annotation notes how racially offensive language was managed in practice, providing relevant precedent to support Council decision-making. Atlas Obscura. (2020, August 14). The museum where racist and oppressive statues go to die. https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/museum-of-toxic-statues-berlin This article describes how racially offensive monuments are removed from public honorific settings and placed in a museum where they are clearly contextualized. Racist language and symbolism are addressed through non- heroic display and interpretive text that explicitly critiques the values represented. Auret, H., & du Preez, J. L. (2024). Rescripting contested monuments amid shifting regionings of concern. Built Heritage, 8(1), 53. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43238-024-00161-0 This case study examines how a racially and politically contentious monument was recontextualized through design interventions before being removed. Offensive commemorative meaning was destabilized through interpretation and consultation prior to relocation. Burch-Brown, J. (2022). Should slavery’s statues be preserved? On transitional justice and contested heritage. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 39(5), 807–824. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/japp.12485 This article analyzes how racially offensive monuments and inscriptions can be managed through preservation with interpretation, recontextualization, removal, or reclamation, emphasizing the need for explicit acknowledgment of racial harm. Canadian Art. (2016, October 3). Offensive artwork titles in Canadian museums: What’s in a name? https://canadianart.ca/features/offensive-terminology-in-artwork- titles/ This article documents how Canadian museums address racially offensive language in titles by renaming works for public display while retaining original terminology in archives, supported by interpretive explanation. Page 74 of 241 Attachment 1 to Report No. CMS26-013 – Annotated Bibliography 2 Collections Trust. (2021, July 26). Tackling racist language in collections. https://collectionstrust.org.uk/spectrum-resources/cataloguing-spectrum/tackling- racist-language-in-collections/ This guidance outlines a systematic approach to identifying racist language in collections and replacing it with appropriate terms, supported by contextual notes explaining historical usage. Coventry Live. (2020, July 3). Racist pet gravestone removed from Coombe Abbey Park. https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/racist-pet-gravestone- coombe-abbey-18535192 This article reports on the permanent removal of a racially offensive pet gravestone in Coventry. The stone was removed following public concern and heritage consultation, with the artifact retained in archives rather than displayed publicly. Deseret News. (2011, October 18). Calif. headstones marked with racial slur replaced. https://www.deseret.com/2011/10/18/20224109/calif-headstones-marked-with- racial-slur-replaced/ This article reports on the replacement of human grave markers at the Mormon Island Relocation Cemetery in California. Racially offensive language that had been carved into headstones during a 1954 relocation was removed during a 2011 project, with new monuments created using appropriate language. Historic New Orleans Collection. (n.d.). Statement on harmful or offensive content. https://catalog.hnoc.org/web/arena/thnoc-statement-on-harmful-or-offensive-content This statement explains how racially offensive language is retained only where historically necessary and addressed through clear contextual statements that emphasize documentation rather than endorsement. Jim Crow Museum of Racist Memorabilia. (n.d.). Why I collect racist objects. https://jimcrowmuseum.ferris.edu/collect.htm This essay explains how racially offensive language and imagery are deliberately retained and interpreted through blunt explanatory text to confront and educate audiences about historical racism. London Museum. (n.d.). Making collections more inclusive. https://www.londonmuseum.org.uk/collections/improving-our-collections/making- collections-more-inclusive/ Page 75 of 241 Attachment 1 to Report No. CMS26-013 – Annotated Bibliography 3 This statement outlines how racially offensive language in collections is acknowledged, contextualized, and interpreted in ways that explicitly distance the institution from discriminatory viewpoints. Museums Victoria. (n.d.). Cultural stereotypes & racism in Museums Victoria collections. https://collections.museumsvictoria.com.au/articles/13230 This article explains how racially offensive language and imagery are identified, explicitly labeled as harmful, and reinterpreted through a decolonizing framework. National Coalition Against Censorship. (2019). Museum best practices for managing controversy. https://ncac.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Museum-Best-Practices- 2019.pdf This resource advises institutions to address racially offensive language through transparency, public communication, and interpretive framing rather than censorship. Sky News. (2020, July 17). Dambusters dog’s memorial replaced by RAF to remove racist name. https://news.sky.com/story/amp/dambusters-dogs-memorial-replaced- by-raf-to-remove-its-racist-name-12030664 This article documents the replacement of a Royal Air Force dog memorial in Lincolnshire due to racially offensive language. The new gravestone removes the name while retaining historical context, allowing commemoration without repeating the offensive term. TV Ontario. (2019, August 27). Why Museum London is using racist artifacts to fight prejudice. https://www.tvo.org/article/why-museum-london-is-using-racist-artifacts- to-fight-prejudice This article describes how racially offensive language and imagery are retained within exhibitions but reframed through explicit interpretation to explain their role in historical prejudice. University of Reading. (n.d.). Statement on potentially harmful content – Museums and collections. https://collections.reading.ac.uk/about-us/statement-on-potentially- harmful-content/ This statement outlines how racially offensive language is retained but contextualized through updated descriptions, consultation, and transparency. Page 76 of 241 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Town of Aurora Committee of the Whole Report No. CS2 6 -0 04 Subject: Council Compensation Review Prepared by: Nicole Estrada, Manager, Human Resources Department: Corporate Services Date: May 12, 2026 Recommendation 1. That Report No. CS26-004 be received; and 2. That Council provide direction. Executive Summary In December 2025, staff were directed by Council to prepare an independent report outlining the total compensation for Council for the term of office following the 2026 Municipal Election. The purpose of this report is to provide Council with relevant information and analysis to support informed consideration of Council compensation. This report also seeks direction from Council regarding its preferred approach to Council compensation for the upcoming Council term.  Staff conducted a market review of Mayor and Councillor compensation to evaluate the appropriateness of the current compensation relative to the roles, responsibilities, and expectations of elected office.  Staff analyzed compensation practices across 10 neighbouring municipalities with similar population size and comparable Council structure to establish a relevant benchmark.  Direction from Council is required with respect to the desired market position (percentile) within the identified comparator group.  Direction from Council is required with respect to the transportation allowance entitlement for the Mayor and Councillors. Page 77 of 241 May 12, 2026 2 of 6 Report No. CS26-004 Background In 2025, staff were directed by Council to conduct a compensation review for Members of Council. The review included the following: • Annual salary for Mayor and Councillors; and • Transportation Allowance. The Town last conducted a compensation review in 2023. No changes were made at that time and instead, staff were directed to conduct a market review for council compensation for the next term of Council, effective January 1, 2027. The purpose of this report is to provide Council with relevant information and analysis to support informed consideration of Council compensation. This report also seeks direction from Council regarding its preferred approach to Council compensation for the 2026-2030 Council term. Analysis Staff conducted a market review of Mayor and Councillor compensation to evaluate the appropriateness of the current compensation relative to the roles, responsibilities, and expectations of elected office. The review was intended to support fair and reasonable compensation while maintaining fiscal responsibility and accountability to Aurora taxpayers. The analysis considered principles of fiscal prudence, the need to attract a diverse and qualified pool of candidates, and the recognition of the demanding nature, complexity, and public accountability associated with the roles of the Mayor and Councillors. Factors such as time commitment, decision‑making responsibilities, and the breadth of issues addressed by elected officials were also considered. Staff analyzed compensation practices across 10 neighbouring municipalities with similar population size and comparable Council structure to establish a relevant benchmark. This included Bradford West Gwillimbury, Caledon, East Gwillimbury, Georgina, Halton Hills, King, Newmarket, Pickering, Uxbridge and Whitchurch-Stouffville. The findings Page 78 of 241 May 12, 2026 3 of 6 Report No. CS26-004 outlined in this report are intended to inform Council’s consideration of compensation levels and provide direction to staff for the subsequent term of office. Direction from Council is required with respect to the desired market position (percentile) within the identified comparator group. As part of the market review, staff assessed potential market positioning options to guide the Town’s approach to Council compensation. A position at the 50th percentile is market. Anything above the 50th percentile is competitive. Based on the data reviewed, consideration may be given to a market position at approximately the 60th percentile, which balances fiscal responsibility with the objective of providing competitive and equitable compensation relative to comparable municipalities. The current salary for the Mayor is assessed at approximately 3.34% below the 60th percentile of the identified comparator group, while Councillor compensation is approximately 31.96% below the 60th percentile of the identified comparator group. Table 1: Compensation for Mayor Table 2: Compensation for Councillors Aligning compensation with the market would address these variances and support fair and equitable compensation reflective of the responsibilities, expectations, and demands of the roles of Mayor and Council. Mayor Current Annual Salary: $114,647.22 Metric Amount ($) Difference vs Current ($) % Increase 50th Percentile $ 116,674.57 $ 2,027.35 1.77 55th Percentile $ 117,902.58 $ 3,255.36 2.84 60th Percentile $ 118,478.63 $ 3,831.41 3.34 Councillors Current Annual Salary: $42,165.21 Metric Amount ($) Difference vs Current ($) % Increase 50th Percentile $ 52,590.24 $ 10,425.03 24.72 55th Percentile $ 53,289.67 $ 11,124.46 26.38 60th Percentile $ 55,640.04 $ 13,474.82 31.96 Page 79 of 241 May 12, 2026 4 of 6 Report No. CS26-004 Direction of Council is required on the transportation allowance entitlement for the Mayor and Councillors. A benchmarking analysis of comparable municipalities indicates that the majority provide a defined annual transportation allowance for the Mayor and Members of Council. Within the comparator group, the Mayor’s annual transportation allowance ranges from $3,000 to $16,000, while annual allowances for Councillors range from $1,500 to $12,000. Based on the average results of the comparator analysis, adjusting the Mayor’s transportation allowance to $12,000 to align with the market would represent a 17.14 per cent increase, while adjusting the Councillors’ transportation allowance to $3,250 would represent a 32 per cent increase. Adjustments should recognize increased vehicle operating costs, and the travel demands associated with the role and, while remaining below most comparator municipalities, demonstrate a fiscally responsible approach to market alignment. Advisory Committee Review None. Legal Considerations None. Financial Implications Any increase to Mayor and Council compensation approved by Council would result in an incremental impact to the Town’s operating budget beginning in the applicable term of office. Arising financial impacts from a change to the Mayor and Council’s compensation would be addressed as a cost pressure as part of the 2027-30 operating budget. Communications Considerations The findings from this report does not have any communications considerations. Page 80 of 241 May 12, 2026 5 of 6 Report No. CS26-004 Climate Change Considerations The findings from this report do not impact greenhouse gas emissions or impact climate change adaptation. Link to Strategic Plan The report promotes progressive corporate excellence and continuous improvement by implementing policy and processes that reflect sound and accountable governance. Alternative(s) to the Recommendation 1. That a by-law be brought forward to a future Council meeting that amends By-law Number 6552-23, being a by-law to provide for the annual remuneration to be paid to the Mayor and Members of Council, for any or all of the following as directed by Council: a) The annual remuneration paid to the Mayor be adjusted to the [choose percentile] percentile. b) The annual remuneration paid to each Councillor be adjusted to the choose percentile] percentile. c) The transportation allowance for the Mayor be adjusted to [insert rate]. d) The transportation allowance for the Councillors be adjusted to [insert rate]. And that the amendments come into effect on January 1, 2027. 2. That no changes be made to the existing remuneration or transportation allowance for the Mayor. 3. That no changes be made to the existing remuneration or transportation allowance for the Councillors. Page 81 of 241 May 12, 2026 6 of 6 Report No. CS26-004 Conclusions Staff undertook a comprehensive market review of Mayor and Council compensation to assess the appropriateness of current compensation in relation to the roles, responsibilities, and expectations of elected office. This review included an analysis of compensation practices across ten (10) neighbouring municipalities with comparable population sizes and governance structures to establish a relevant market benchmark. Based on the findings of the review, direction from Council is required with respect to the desired market positioning (percentile) within the identified comparator group, as well as the continuation or modification of car allowance entitlements for the Mayor and Members of Council. Reviews of benefits and severance entitlements for Members of Council confirm that no changes are required at this time. Council’s direction on the identified matters will enable staff to proceed accordingly and ensure that compensation practices remain fair, competitive, and aligned with Council’s objectives. Attachments None. Previous Reports None. Pre-submission Review Agenda Management Team review on April 23, 2026 Approvals Approved by Patricia De Sario, Director, Corporate Services/Town Solicitor Approved by Doug Nadorozny, Chief Administrative Officer Page 82 of 241 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Town of Aurora Committee of the Whole Report No. CS2 6 -0 11 Subject: Disclosure of Documents Related to Victoria Hall Refurbishment Prepared by: Anne Kantharajah, Town Clerk Department: Corporate Services Date: May 12, 2026 Recommendation 1. That Report No. CS26-011 be received for information. Executive Summary On March 31, 2026, Council directed staff to compile and release publicly all documentation related to the Victoria Hall Refurbishment budget increase without contravening the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, procurement integrity requirements, contractual confidentiality obligations, or legal privilege. The direction also required staff to bring a staff report to Council by May 2026 confirming the list of documents released and unreleased. The purpose of this report is to provide Council the documents released and listing any unreleased documents with an explanation of the applicable reasons for requiring continued nondisclosure.  The Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (the “Act”) governs access to records held by municipalities and other local public sector institutions in Ontario.  Each document was reviewed to identify mandatory exemptions, where disclosure is prohibited by law, and discretionary exemptions, where staff have the discretion to withhold information but must first consider whether disclosure is appropriate in the circumstances. Background On March 31, 2026, Council direction to staff to: Page 83 of 241 May 12, 2026 2 of 5 Report No. CS26-011 1) Compile and release publicly all documentation related to the Victoria Hall Refurbishment budget increase, including but not limited to: a) Engineering and structural reports; b) Architectural and design consultant reports; c) The Class D cost estimate dated December 1, 2025, and any subsequent cost estimates; d) Project scope documents and supporting technical studies; e) Internal staff reports or memoranda that informed the revised project scope or cost estimates; f) Any additional documentation relied upon in preparing the report recommending the budget increase; and 2) That the release does not contravene the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, procurement integrity requirements, contractual confidentiality obligations, or legal privilege; and 3) Report back to Council by May 2026 confirming the documents being released and listing any unreleased documents with an explanation of the applicable reasons for requiring continued nondisclosure. The purpose of this report is to provide Council the documents released and listing any unreleased documents with an explanation of the applicable reasons for requiring continued nondisclosure. Analysis The Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (the “Act”) governs access to records held by municipalities and other local public sector institutions in Ontario. The Act is based on the principle that municipal information should generally be available to the public, subject to certain mandatory or discretionary exemptions in the Act or any other legislation. These exemptions recognize that certain records such as personal information, confidential third-party business information, solicitor-client privileged material, or sensitive negotiation and litigation records cannot be disclosed creating a balance between transparency with legal obligations. Page 84 of 241 May 12, 2026 3 of 5 Report No. CS26-011 Each document was reviewed to identify mandatory exemptions, where disclosure is prohibited by law, and discretionary exemptions, where staff have the discretion to withhold information but must first consider whether disclosure is appropriate in the circumstances. Following Council direction, staff compiled all documents related to the Victoria Hall Refurbishment as specified in Attachment 1 – Records Index. In reviewing the documents for mandatory exemptions, staff considered exemptions under s.9 (relations with other governments), s.10 (third party information) and s.14 (personal privacy) of the Act. If grounds for a mandatory exemption exist, the record was not released. In exercising discretionary exemptions, staff considered the municipality’s:  procurement integrity requirements;  contractual confidentiality obligations;  legal privilege; and  whether the disclosure is in the general public interest in transparency. Where identified, staff did not disclose the information. Advisory Committee Review None. Legal Considerations This report is provided in accordance with Council’s direction of March 31, 2026, respecting the public release of documentation related to the Victoria Hall Refurbishment budget increase. As a municipality, the Town is subject to confidentiality and non‑disclosure obligations under the Act, as outlined throughout this report, and may also be subject to applicable contractual obligations with third‑parties. Financial Implications None. Page 85 of 241 May 12, 2026 4 of 5 Report No. CS26-011 Communications Considerations The documents fully or partially released to the public are now available on the Town of Aurora’s Public Record repository. Climate Change Considerations The recommendations from this report do not impact greenhouse gas emissions or impact climate change adaptation Link to Strategic Plan This report supports the Strategic Plan goal of “Support an Exceptional Quality of Life for All” by promoting service accountability, excellence and innovation. Alternative(s) to the Recommendation There are no alternatives to the recommendation in this report. Conclusions Staff undertook this review as directed by Council to release documents related to the Victoria Hall Refurbishment, and provide Council the listing any unreleased documents with an explanation of the applicable reasons for requiring continued nondisclosure. Attachments Attachment 1 – Records Index Previous Reports None. Pre-submission Review Reviewed by AMT on May 5, 2026. Page 86 of 241 May 12, 2026 5 of 5 Report No. CS26-011 Approvals Approved by Patricia De Sario, Director, Corporate Services/Town Solicitor Approved by Doug Nadorozny, Chief Administrative Officer Page 87 of 241 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Town of Aurora Attachment 1 - Records Index Corporate Services, Legislative Services Document No. Date Description Disclosed (Fully, partially, or not disclosed) Applicable reasons for continued nondisclosure No. of Pages 1 June 15, 2025 Area Takeoffs Fully Disclosed 25 2 December 1, 2025 Victoria Hall Renovations - Class “D” Cost Estimate (Alternative) Not Disclosed Would reveal the substance of on going negotiations with a third party 13 3 Undated Victoria Hall - Scope of Work Fully Disclosed 2 4 July 21, 2025 Victoria Hall Restoration and Renovation – Preliminary Design Options Fully Disclosed 5 5 July 31, 2025 Proposed Structural Drawings Fully Disclosed 5 6 June 16, 2025 Victoria Hall - Existing Drawings Fully Disclosed 5 7 August 28, 2025 Finishes, Furniture and Equipment Plan Fully Disclosed 1 8 June 24, 2025 Victoria Hall Exterior Restoration – Draft Fully Disclosed 11 Page 88 of 241 Document No. Date Description Disclosed (Fully, partially, or not disclosed) Applicable reasons for continued nondisclosure No. of Pages 9 Undated Elevations, Fully Disclosed 1 10 Undated Victoria Hall - 3D Views, Fully Disclosed 4 11 July 31, 2025 Victoria Hall – Structural Modifications Fully Disclosed 1 12 Undated Mechanical and HVAC equipment Fully Disclosed 42 13 November 25, 2025 Victoria Hall Renovations - Class “D” Cost Estimate - Tenant Costs Not Disclosed Would reveal the substance of on going negotiations with a third party. 8 14 January 20, 2026 CS&P Architects Inc. - Fee Letter Not Disclosed S. 10 of MFIPPA 3 15 April 30, 2025 Building Designated Substance Survey, 25 Mosley Street Fully Disclosed 33 16 April 2, 2026 Heritage Impact Assessment Victoria Hall, 27 Mosley Street Fully Disclosed 43 17 August 29. 2024 Feasibility Study Victoria Hall Fully Disclosed 65 18 May 30, 2025 The Adjunct to Feasibility Study prepared by Remy Consulting Engineers Ltd. Fully Disclosed 82 Page 89 of 241 Document No. Date Description Disclosed (Fully, partially, or not disclosed) Applicable reasons for continued nondisclosure No. of Pages 19 Undated Existing Floor Plan Fully Disclosed 1 20 Undated Proposed Floor Plan Fully Disclosed 1 21 May 30, 2025 Victoria Hall - Renovation Fully Disclosed previously in response to a FOI 3 22 February 25, 2026 Town of Aurora Site Plan Pre-Consultation Checklist Fully Disclosed 17 23 June 11, 2025 Quotation for Topographic Plan of Survey Not Disclosed S. 10 of MFIPPA 2 Page 90 of 241 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Town of Aurora Committee of the Whole Report No. FIN 2 6 -0 16 Subject: Reserve Framework Updates Prepared by: Sandeep Dhillon, Senior Advisor, Financial Management Department: Finance Date: May 12, 2026 Recommendation 1. That Report No. FIN26-016 be received; and 2. That Council approve all identified reserve framework changes as proposed. Executive Summary This report proposes the implementation of a new reference template for the Town’s reserves. The reference template provides details about the management of each reserve fund. Furthermore, this report presents a list of recommended changes to the existing reserve framework.  The reserve reference sheet template has been updated to offer enhanced clarity and consistency  A review of reserves has identified some proposed changes to the reserve portfolio  A new reserve in support of affordable housing has been created  Engineering Fee reserve consolidation into the Roads Asset Management reserve Background Reserves are one of the most important tools available to municipalities for achieving financial sustainability and flexibility. Reserves not only assist municipalities in their management of risk, they also play a critical role in the financing of capital costs and Page 91 of 241 May 12, 2026 2 of 5 Report No. FIN26-016 the provision of affordable and stable services to constituents. Reserves are maintained to ensure both short- and long-term financial sustainability for the Town. In consideration that longer term capital requirements can be significant, the town must build these reserve balances up over an extended period (up to 80 years in some instances) of time to minimize the annual financial impact to taxpayers. Therefore, a municipality’s reserve balances cannot be viewed solely with a short-term lens. The existing reserve reference template was created in 2013 as part of by-law 5553-13 under which many of the Town’s existing reserve funds were established. Since this time Town staff have continued to use this existing template to record the detailed information for any additional reserves that were created. As per the 2021 approved Fiscal Strategy’s action plan, staff have completed a comprehensive review of the Town’s reserve framework. This review identified a need to update the Town’s existing reserve reference sheet template. Analysis The reserve reference sheet template has been updated to offer enhanced clarity and consistency Every Town reserve is supported by an approved bylaw or reference sheet. Staff have developed a new reserve reference sheet template that provides a clearer and more consistent format that identifies the purpose of the reserve, how funds may be used, funding sources and the target balance for the reserve. The new reserve reference sheet template clearly identifies details such as reserve type, category and any by-law associated with each reserve along with its representation in Town’s annual financial statements. A sample of the proposed reserve reference sheet template may be viewed under Attachment 1 to 4. A Review of reserves has identified some proposed changes to the reserve portfolio A high-level review of the Town’s existing reserve portfolio has resulted in some proposed changes to select reserve reference sheets. These recommended changes help to ensure that these reserves continue to align with their intended operational requirements. Table 1 presents a summary of the proposed reserve reference sheet changes: Page 92 of 241 May 12, 2026 3 of 5 Report No. FIN26-016 Table 1 Proposed Reserve Reference Sheet Change Reserve Name Proposed Change Heritage reserve Expansion of eligible reserve uses to include other related programs or initiatives. Green Initiatives reserve Expansion of eligible reserve uses to include other applicable Town plans or studies. Asset Management / Growth & New and Studies & Other reserve Adjustment of target reserve balance to include a requirement to maintain a positive balance while remaining aligned with the Town’s 10-year capital plan as well as its Asset Management, if applicable. Economic Development Initiative reserve Updated to reflect current operational requirements and to clarify how the reserve may be accessed. The updated Heritage, Green Initiative, Economic Development Initiative and a sample of Fleet and Equipment Asset Management reserve reference sheet are included under attachment 1 to 4. A new reserve in support of affordable housing has been created As per Council’s recently endorsed Affordable Housing Action Plan, an Affordable Housing Reserve fund has been established to finance the acquisition, construction, repair, and/or operating costs of affordable rental or market housing projects and initiatives in line with the policies of the Town's Official Plan. The major source of funding for the Affordable Housing reserve fund is cash-in-lieu contributions from developers and/or the funds provided by the provincial or federal governments, or other agencies, in support local affordable housing initiatives. Eligible expenditures may include, but are not necessarily limited to, assisting affordable housing providers, providing grant or incentive opportunities for the creation of affordable housing opportunities, or promoting affordable rental housing options and ensuring the long-term maintenance of their affordability. The Affordable Housing Reserve fund’s reference sheet may be found under Attachment 5. Page 93 of 241 May 12, 2026 4 of 5 Report No. FIN26-016 Engineering Fee reserve consolidation into the Roads Asset Management reserve A recent staff review has confirmed that the Engineering fee reserve is no longer required as engineering fees are now recognized as part of the Town’s operating budget as the underlying services that they are paying for are provided. Therefore, it is recommended that the Engineering Fee reserve be closed and its balance of $1,365,802 as of December 31, 2025, be transferred to the road’s asset management reserve. Advisory Committee Review NA Legal Considerations The establishment and management of reserve funds are governed by the Municipal Act, 2001, and applicable Town by-laws. The Delegation of Authority Bylaw 6212-19 gives the Treasurer the authority for the management of reserves. Financial Implications There are no direct financial implications from this report. Communications Considerations The Town will inform the public about the information contained in this report by posting it to the Town’s website. Climate Change Considerations The recommendations from this report does not impact greenhouse gas emissions or impact climate change adaptation Link to Strategic Plan Reserve Management supports all aspects of the strategic plan. Specifically, this report supports the Plan principles of Leadership in Corporate and Financial Management, Leveraging Partnerships, and Progressive Corporate Excellence and Continuous Improvement. Page 94 of 241 May 12, 2026 5 of 5 Report No. FIN26-016 Alternative(s) to the Recommendation Council may provide alternative direction. Conclusions The reserve management pillar of the fiscal strategy focuses on the long-term financial stability for the Town. Therefore, keeping up to date with any operational and legislation changes that govern the reserve is necessary and prudent practice. This review ensure that the reserve funding sources are consistent and aligned with the intended usage and are updated in alignment with the legislations and Town’s operational needs. Attachments Attachment 1 - Heritage Reserve reference sheet Attachment 2 - Green Initiatives Reserve reference sheet Attachment 3 - Economic Development Initiatives Reserve reference sheet Attachment 4 - Fleet and Equipment Reserve reference sheet Attachment 5 - Affordable Housing Reserve reference sheet Previous Reports NA Pre-submission Review Agenda Management Team review on April 23, 2026 Approvals Approved by Rachel Wainwright-van Kessel, CPA, CMA, Director, Finance Approved by Doug Nadorozny, Chief Administrative Officer Page 95 of 241 Attachment 1 RESERVE: HERITAGE FUND Reserve Characteristics: Reserve number: 119 Financial Statement Presentation: Accumulated surplus Reserve Type: Discretionary Reserve Category: Asset Management Bylaw: 5553-14 6212-19 Delegation of Authority By-law, Schedule C – Financial Matters Purpose of the reserve: To receive and hold proceeds of agreements or donations in connection with the demolition or preservation of heritage structures, facilities or sites. Funding source: From proceeds of agreement or donations in connection with the demolition or preservation of heritage structures, facilities or sites. Use of funds: For specific projects, programs or initiatives as recommended to or by Council during the annual budget process, or at other times throughout the year, having consulted with the Heritage Advisory Committee. Balance in the fund shall be used to help the Heritage Advisory Committee achieve their duties and functions as outlined in the Committee's Terms of Reference, as approved by Council from time to time, and to help facilitate any special programs, projects, or initiatives of the Committee which have been given Council approval. Target balance and financing Due to its nature, there is no target balance for this Fund Other In the event of the dissolution of the Committee by Council, or at any time following such, acting in the best interests of the Town, Council may direct that some or all balances in the Fund be transferred to other reserve funds, or used for other purposes. Page 96 of 241 Attachment 2 RESERVE: GREEN INITIATIVES Reserve Characteristics: Reserve number: 117 Financial Statement Presentation: Accumulated surplus Reserve Type: Discretionary Reserve Category: Special purpose Bylaw: 5553-14 6212-19 Delegation of Authority By-law, Schedule C – Financial Matters Purpose of the reserve: The Green Initiatives Reserve Fund (the "Fund") is established to receive and hold donations or budgetary contributions for purposes of funding or lending funding for projects or initiatives which further the objectives or support the strategic directions of the Town's Corporate Environmental Action Plan as amended from time to time, as well as other applicable Town plans or studies. Council may direct that portions of revenues or savings arising from certain projects are to be contributed to the Reserve Fund. Funding source: Donations or budgeted tax levy contributions as approved by Council. Use of funds: Balances in the Fund will be planned for specific projects or initiatives as recommended to or by Council during the annual budget process, or at other times throughout the year, having consulted with the Environmental Advisory Committee. Target balance and financing Due to its nature, there is no target balance for this Fund. Other At any time, acting in the best interests of the Town, Council may direct that some or all balances in the Fund be transferred to other reserve funds, or used for other purposes. Page 97 of 241 Attachment 3 RESERVE: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES Reserve Characteristics: Reserve number: 126 Financial Statement Presentation: Accumulated surplus Reserve Type: Discretionary Reserve Category: Growth Bylaw: 6038-17 Amend 5553-13-Establish Various Reserve Funds 6212-19 Delegation of Authority By-law, Schedule C – Financial Matters Purpose of the reserve: To receive and hold all funds received from various special economic development initiatives undertaken by the Town with input from, or in collaboration with the Aurora Economic Development Board or its successor. Funding source: Revenue generated from various economic development initiatives undertaken by the Town with input from, or in collaboration with the Aurora Economic Development Board or its successor. Funding may also include annual budgeted contributions as approved by Council. Use of funds: Balances in the Fund will be planned for specific projects or initiatives by the Town, including supporting the implementation of the Aurora Promenade Community Improvement Plan, deemed to be in the best interest of the Town and expected to further the economic development of the Town. Such funding allocations are to be recommended to or by Council during the annual budget process, or other times throughout the year. Target balance and financing Due to the nature of this reserve fund, there is no specific target balance identified Other At any time, acting in the best interests of the Town, Council may direct that some or all balances in the Fund be transferred to other reserve funds, or used for other purposes, provided that the transfer or use of tax sourced funding is appropriate in the circumstances. Page 98 of 241 Attachment 4 RESERVE: EQUIPMENT/FLEET R&R Reserve Characteristics: Reserve number: 106 Financial Statement Presentation: Accumulated surplus Reserve Type: Discretionary Reserve Category: Asset Management Bylaw: 5553-13 6212-19 Delegation of Authority By-law, Schedule C – Financial Matters Purpose of the reserve: To receive and hold funding for the purpose of funding the tax levy component for major repairs, restorations, upgrades or replacement of the Town’s rolling stock fleet, and operational equipment. Funding source: Annual budgeted tax-levy contributions as approved by Council Use of funds: To fund major repairs, restorations, upgrades or replacement of the Town's rolling stock fleet, and operational equipment. Such owned assets may include all licensed motor vehicles, trailers and related equipment components, unlicensed vehicles and powered equipment, and major other machinery and equipment, and any other related assets not classed as "minor equipment" or "small tools" by the Town's financial and budget policies. Target balance and financing The reserve should maintain a positive balance while remaining aligned with the Town’s requirements as identified by its 10-year capital plan as well as its Asset Management Plan objectives for Fleet and Equipment. Other At any time, acting in the best interests of the Town, Council may direct that some or all balances in the Fund be transferred to other reserve funds, or used for other purposes, provided that the transfer or use of tax sourced funding is appropriate in the circumstances. Page 99 of 241 Attachment 5 RESERVE: AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESERVE Reserve Characteristics: Reserve number: 166 Financial Statement Presentation: Deferred revenue Reserve Type: [Discretionary/Obligatory] Reserve Category: Asset Management AND Growth Bylaw: 6212-19 Delegation of Authority By-law, Schedule C – Financial Matters Purpose of the reserve: To finance the acquisition, construction, repair, and/or operating costs of affordable rental or market housing projects and initiatives in line with the policies of the Town's Official Plan Funding source: The major source of funding for the Affordable Housing reserve fund is cash-in-lieu contributions from developers and/or the funds provided by the provincial or federal governments, or other agencies, in support local affordable housing initiatives. Use of funds: Eligible expenditures may include, but are not necessarily limited to, assisting affordable housing providers, providing grant or incentive opportunities for the creation of affordable housing opportunities, or promoting affordable rental housing options and ensuring the long- term maintenance of their affordability. Target balance and financing Due to its nature, there is no target balance for this Fund. Other NA Page 100 of 241 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Town of Aurora Committee of the Whole Report No. PDS 2 6 -044 Subject: Heritage Permit Application HPA-2026-02 – Victoria Hall (27 Mosley Street) Prepared by: Adam Robb, Manager, Policy Planning and Heritage Department: Planning and Development Services Date: May 12, 2026 Recommendation 1. That Report No. PDS26-044 be received; and 2. That Heritage Permit Application HPA-2026-02 be approved, to permit the restoration and alteration of Victoria Hall (27 Mosley Street). Executive Summary This report seeks Council’s approval of Heritage Permit Application HPA-2026-02 regarding the restoration and alteration of Victoria Hall.  Victoria Hall is an individually designated heritage property located within the downtown Aurora Promenade  Council has approved a capital project to refurbish the building, and heritage permit approval is required prior to construction commencing Background Victoria Hall is an individually designated heritage property located within the downtown Aurora Promenade Victoria Hall is a Gothic Revival building individually designated under the Ontario Heritage Act through By-law 5081-08.R. The building is notable for its significant historical, design, and contextual value as a community asset within the downtown Page 101 of 241 May 12, 2026 2 of 8 Report No. PDS26-044 Promenade area. Notable heritage features include the front gable roof, gothic windows, side buttresses and brick exterior. The building was originally constructed in 1883 to house the local Disciples of Christ congregation. By 1922, the property was sold to the Trustees of the Aurora Public School, where it became a health hall. In 1945, the building transitioned to a library, which remained open until approximately 1963, while the property was transferred to the Town in 1951. Since then, the building has been used for a variety of purposes and programming but has remained vacant since the construction of Town Square. Analysis Council has approved a capital project to refurbish the building, and heritage permit approval is required prior to construction commencing Due to the location of Victoria Hall as part of the downtown Aurora Promenade, adaptive re-use of the property is encouraged. In 2025, Council authorized Community Services (Facilities) staff to issue a Request for Expression of Interest (REOI) for Leased Space Operators at Victoria Hall. Further, through Community Services (Facilities) capital project AM0259, Council approved refurbishing and completing repairs to Victoria Hall. Community Services has retained CS&P Architects as the design consultant for the project. The capital project and proposed work to Victoria Hall includes: - Removal of the non-heritage rear addition at southern end (built circa the 1970s) - Addition of a new rear entrance (southern end) - Addition of an accessible ramp and stairs (southern end) - Interior layout alterations including relocation of washroom facilities and construction of an accessible, barrier-free washroom - Opening of a Cathedral ceiling (removal of non-heritage drop ceiling) - Restoration of certain heritage elements including exterior bricks, and replacement/enhancement of features such as the doorway and guardrails - Improvements to other non-heritage infrastructure/technical components, such as electrical systems, mechanical, flooring/building structure etc. The intent of the capital project is to refurbish Victoria Hall and enable the adaptive re- use of the site. Conceptual elevations, site plan drawings and renderings are further attached to this report (with drawings having been updated slightly based on comments received from the Heritage Advisory Committee, which are detailed further below in this Page 102 of 241 May 12, 2026 3 of 8 Report No. PDS26-044 report). Additionally, a Heritage Impact Assessment has also been prepared by a qualified heritage consultant in support of the proposed alterations, which deems the work to be minor and acceptable from a heritage perspective. Advisory Committee Review The Heritage Advisory Committee reviewed the subject heritage permit application at the meeting held on April 13, 2026. The following comments were provided by the Committee, and responses by the consultants: HAC Comment Consultant Response Questions regarding the compatibility of the modern rear addition relevant to the historic character of Victoria Hall. Preference given to using bricks or trying to match the style of Victoria Hall through the addition and not use glass. The consultant noted the province’s guiding principle in heritage conservation being “Legibility” and that new work should be clearly distinguished from old. Additions should be recognized as products of their own time and not blur the distinction between old and new. Trying to replicate Victoria Hall and its bricks in the new addition would run the risk of not maintaining clear legibility between the new addition and original historic building. The existing historic building is being fully maintained in situ and the addition is considered a product of its own time. Using bricks and trying to match the style of Victoria Hall was largely what was attempted in the 1970s with the existing rear addition. Page 103 of 241 May 12, 2026 4 of 8 Report No. PDS26-044 HAC Comment Consultant Response Concern over the building’s new orientation with the rear now largely serving as the primary entrance. Preference to have the rear addition either be smaller/scaled down or more exclusive for accommodating an accessibility entrance only, with the historic front entrance to continue to be used as a primary entryway for the main volume of entries. The consultant indicated that in order to make the building accessible, a ramp would need to be installed and that the most appropriate location is the rear, to minimize impacts on trees and the main front heritage façade. This also provided an opportunity for enhanced inter- connection with the existing Town Square. The historic front entrance is still functionable and will also be restored and not exclusively serve as just an exit. It will also still be able to function as an entrance point. Concern over the size/scale of the rear landscaped area and loss of parking spaces. The consultant indicated that this space was designed in a manner to activate the public realm and to provide enhanced connection to the Town Square. A reduction of parking spaces to the Town Square property is technically outside the scope of heritage permit review as no heritage features of Victoria Hall are impacted through that specific work. Based on comments received, the rear landscaped area has been revised slightly in the attached latest drawings to try and minimize the extent of the stairs and add more open/patio space to the entryway area. Confirmation of protection for interior wainscoting as the interior alterations take place, and comment that the washroom location impacts the existing Mosley Street doorway. The consultant confirmed the intent to protect and enhance the wainscoting through any new interior layouts. The interior layout has also been revised in the latest drawings to account for this comment and now proposes having the washroom facility flank the side of the doorway so as to provide clearer access and line of sight to the historic doorway. Page 104 of 241 May 12, 2026 5 of 8 Report No. PDS26-044 HAC Comment Consultant Response Question/concern regarding the location of the gas metre and its visibility from Victoria Street. The latest drawings attached have corrected the gas metre location to no longer show it as visible from Victoria Street. Concern that the new addition may become outdated itself in 50+ years The consultant indicated the design intentionally accounts for this and the best practice of “reversibility”. By clearly distinguishing the new addition from the main historic Victoria Hall, future long- term work on the property can clearly understand the old vs. new and replace any new components as desired in the future while still respecting the core components of historic Victoria Hall. The architecture is intended to be a product of its own modern time and not try to falsely replicate the historic style of the past, which runs the risk of blurring the distinction of old and new time periods. Questions regarding cost savings if the rear addition was to be simplified/made smaller. The consultant indicated that a primary focus on the design was to make the building accessible. Cost-savings in this domain could result in negative impacts overall to the building’s accessibility. Opportunities to save costs will continue to be explored by the consultant team and facilities staff through the duration of the project. Concern over the protection of heritage features. Per the heritage designation by-law, the defined heritage attributes of the property include the gable roofline, gothic windows and sills, side buttresses, front entryway, brick, datestone and wainscoting. These items are largely unimpacted by the proposed alterations and the rear addition. The designated heritage features are intended to be restored/enhanced as part of the capital Page 105 of 241 May 12, 2026 6 of 8 Report No. PDS26-044 HAC Comment Consultant Response project. The rear addition was also intentionally designed with a glass curtain wall to promote transparency and be able to expose/highlight some of the key heritage features of Victoria Hall for appreciation (such as improving sightlines for bricks and into the interior). Other comments from members of the public have also been received, with some echoing those made by the Heritage Advisory Committee as outlined above, and others being in favour of the proposed design, citing the ability to revitalize the site while effectively distinguishing between the historic Victoria Hall and providing opportunity for inter-connection to Town Square. The consultant’s Heritage Impact Assessment ultimately concludes that the proposal represents a minimal and acceptable impact on Victoria Hall from a heritage perspective. The consulting team also noted that throughout the construction process, attention would be given to any heritage features of the building that become uncovered, such as beams that may get exposed as the ceiling is opened, or the transom above the front door, etc. with priority given to the care and restoration of these features. Legal Considerations Under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, any developments or alterations that would potentially impact the heritage character of an individually designated heritage property requires Council’s consent. This legislative requirement is implemented in the Town of Aurora through the process of a Heritage Permit Application, which is subject to Council’s approval after consultation with the Heritage Advisory Committee. Council must make a decision on a heritage permit application within 90 days after a notice of receipt is served on the applicant, otherwise Council shall be deemed to have consented to the application. This deadline can also be extended indefinitely on consent of the applicant and Town. In this scenario, the Town is both the owner and applicant and staff will follow Council direction with respect to the application. Page 106 of 241 May 12, 2026 7 of 8 Report No. PDS26-044 Financial Implications There are no direct financial implications as a result of this heritage permit review process. However, this heritage permit is in support of the Town’s approved capital project AM0259 – Victoria Hall Refurbishment. Communications Considerations None directly pertaining to this Heritage Permit process. Future communications regarding project timing and milestones will be provided throughout construction. Climate Change Considerations The restoration and adaptive re-use of Victoria Hall encourages the long-term sustainability and resiliency of the heritage asset. Link to Strategic Plan Supporting an Exceptional Quality of Life for All by satisfying the requirements under Celebrating and Promoting our Culture. Alternative to the Recommendation 1. That Heritage Permit Application HPA-2026-02 be refused. Conclusions Heritage Permit Application HPA-2026-02 proposes alterations and the restoration of Victora Hall. Since the property is individually designated under the Ontario Heritage Act, Council approval of the heritage permit application is required prior to construction commencing. Attachments Attachment 1 – Location Map Attachment 2 – Conceptual Site Plan, Elevations and Renderings Attachment 3 – Heritage Impact Assessment Report Page 107 of 241 May 12, 2026 8 of 8 Report No. PDS26-044 Previous Reports Heritage Advisory Committee Memorandum dated April 13, 2026. Pre-submission Review Agenda Management Team review on April 23, 2026 Approvals Approved by Marco Ramunno, Director, Planning and Development Services Approved by Doug Nadorozny, Chief Administrative Officer Page 108 of 241 ••$WWDFKPHQWLRFDWLRQ0DS0RVOH\6WUHHW 9LFWRULD+DOO SUBJECT LANDS02550MetresPage 109 of 241 VICTORIA HALL RESTORATION AND RENOVATION Town of Aurora April 20, 2026 Attachment 2 Page 110 of 241 REDUCED TOWN SQUARE PARKING (2 SPACES REMOVED) NEW ADDITION EXISTING 1-STOREY BUILDING +267.15 UP LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL SERVICEEXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALKRAMP 1:15 (6.6%) Total Length 8.35m PRIMARY ENTRANCE VICTORIA HALL - SITE PLAN 25 Mosley St, Aurora, ON L4G 1R2 1:150 2026-04-2 N Page 111 of 241 M O S L E Y S T R E E T CU-2 CU-1 BF WR WR MAIN DISCONNECT METER CABINETELECTRICAL PANELSWITCHCU-3 WATER METERHWT WATER SOFTENER V I C T O R I A S T R E E TENTRY VESTIBULE RAMP 1:15 (6.6%) Total Length 8.35m EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALKPRIMARY ENTRANCE OPEN AREA EXTERIOR TERRACE VICTORIA HALL - GROUND FLOOR PLAN 25 Mosley St, Aurora, ON L4G 1R2 2026-04-20 1:100 Page 112 of 241 6287+HOHYDWLRQ 1257+HOHYDWLRQ )/225/(9(/ 522) )/225/(9(/ 522) VICTORIA HALL - NORTH & SOUTH ELEVAITON 25 Mosley St, Aurora, ON L4G 1R2 2026-04-20 1:100 11 Page 113 of 241 WEST elevation 4 EAST elevation 2 FLOOR LEVEL FLOOR LEVEL ROOF ROOF VICTORIA HALL - EAST & WEST ELEVATION 25 Mosley St, Aurora, ON L4G 1R2 2026-04-20 1:100 11 Page 114 of 241 TOWN OF AURORA | VICTORIA HALL RESTORATION AND RENOVATION VICTORIA HALL - 3D VIEWS 25 Mosley Street, Aurora, ON L4G 1R2 2026-0 Page 115 of 241 HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Victoria Hall 27 Mosley Street Aurora, ON L4G 1R2 Date: 2 April 2026 Prepared for: Town of Aurora 229 Industrial Pkwy. N. Aurora, ON L4G 4C4 Attachment 3 Page 116 of 241 Executive Summary 1 1 - Introduction 2 1.1 Report Scope 2 1.2 Methodology 2 1.3 Site & Context 2 1.4 Heritage Status 10 1.5 Contacts 10 2 - Site History & Design 11 3 - Policy Framework 14 3.1 York Region Official Plan 15 3.2 Town of Aurora Official Plan 15 3.3 Town of Aurora Heritage Impact Assessments and Conservation Plans 16 4 - Cultural Heritage Value 17 4.1 Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest 17 4.2 Description of Heritage Attributes 18 5 - Building Condition Assessment 19 5.1 Limitations & Extent 19 5.2 Methodology 19 5.3 Building Assessment 20 6 - Proposed Work 26 7 - Assessment of Impact 28 8 - Conservation and Mitigation Strategies 31 8.1 Conservation Approach 31 8.2 Mitigation Strategies 31 9 - Conclusion 33 10 - Sources 34 TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendices 35 A - Project Personnel 35 B - Heritage Designation By-Law 36 Page 117 of 241 Victoria Hall Heritage Impact Assessment 1 Giaimo 2 April 2026 Introduction Giaimo has been retained by the Town of Aurora (the “Owner”) to provide a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for Victoria Hall at 27 Mosley Street (the “Site”) in the Town of Aurora, Ontario. The Site is located on the south side of Mosley Street in Aurora’s downtown area. This HIA considers the Site’s rehabilitation and the potential impact of the proposed design on the designated cultural heritage resource. Site History & Design Victoria Hall was constructed in 1883 for the local Disciples of Christ congregation. It is a modest Gothic Revival building built of local yellow brick and distinguished by its steep front gable roof, pointed-arch openings, and projecting buttresses. After the property was sold in 1922, the building served a number of civic and community functions. It remains an important historic resource within downtown Aurora and contributes to a long-standing cluster of public and institutional uses in the surrounding area. Cultural Heritage Value Victoria Hall is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act by Town of Aurora By-law 5081-08.R, passed on November 10, 2008. The property was designated for its historical, associative, architectural, and contextual value. The designation by-law identifies Victoria Hall as a “good and rare example of a smaller church building built in the Gothic Revival Style” and recognizes its long-standing role in Aurora’s community life. Assessment of Existing Condition The building is overall in good to fair condition and includes a small utilitarian brick addition at the rear elevation. The masonry appears to be generally in good to fair condition, with select areas of cracking, parging at the EXECUTIVE SUMMARY buttresses, mortar loss, and incompatible repairs. Painted wood elements and windowsills show weathering, peeling paint, and localized deterioration. The principal entrance door has been altered, and the historic transom seems to be concealed. Proposed Development The proposed work involves rehabilitation of Victoria Hall, including a one-storey glass addition and accessibility upgrades at the rear elevation. The proposed work is intended to support the continued viable use of the heritage building while conserving its identified heritage attributes. Assessment of Impact The proposed development will have a minimal and acceptable impact on the heritage resource. Since the project is primarily rehabilitative in nature and directed toward the continued use and repair of the building, it will conserve the building and extend the life of the designated resource. Potential impacts relate mainly to selective exterior interventions and the future integration of mechanical elements, but these can be mitigated through detailed design, selection of compatible materials, and careful placement that respects the heritage attributes of the historic place. Conservation and Mitigation The conservation strategy for this project is rehabilitation. Documentation of the existing building, including measured drawings and photographic recording, should form part of the conservation approach. A separate Conservation Plan document is not recommended. Instead, the conservation work could be implemented through a Heritage Permit application including drawings and trade specifications. Exterior restoration work should be carried out by a qualified heritage contractor. Page 118 of 241 2 Introduction 1 - INTRODUCTION 1.1 REPORT SCOPE This Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) has been prepared by Giaimo + Associates Architects Inc. (“Giaimo”), who has been retained by the Town of Aurora, to assess the proposed work at Victoria Hall, 27 Mosley Street (the “Site”), in the Town of Aurora, Ontario. Victoria Hall, also known as the Disciples of Christ Church, is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA) by the Town of Aurora By-law 5081-08.R, passed on 10 November 2008. The Site is located on the south side of Mosley Street. This HIA assesses the potential impact of the proposed design on the Site’s cultural heritage value and heritage attributes, and considers the rehabilitation of the building including a one-storey addition and accessibility upgrades to the rear elevation. An HIA, according to municipal terms of reference, is intended to identify cultural heritage resources, evaluate their significance, and assess how proposed development may affect those resources. This report considers the designated heritage resource on the Site and recommends conservation and mitigation measures intended to minimize adverse impacts while supporting the long-term use and viability of Victoria Hall. 1.2 METHODOLOGY Preparing the HIA included review of the heritage designation by-law, background material, and the current proposed design package. The building was also reviewed through site observations undertaken by the project team on March 25, 2026. The heritage resource has been assessed with reference to the Ontario Heritage Act, and the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (Second Edition). Further details regarding existing condition are provided in Section 5 of this report. 1.3 SITE & CONTEXT Victoria Hall is situated within a mixed low-rise context characterized by institutional, religious, civic, and residential uses. To the north, the site fronts Mosley Street, with St. Andrew’s Presbyterian Church located on the northeast corner of Mosley Street and Victoria Street. To the east, across Victoria Street, is Holy Forty Martyrs Church. To the south, the site interfaces with the Aurora Town Square parking and access area. To the west, the property abuts a two-storey house. This immediate setting reflects a varied but predominantly community-oriented context, where religious, cultural, and residential building types coexist within the historic core of Aurora. The immediate context consists of a mixed institutional, civic, and residential context: • Low-rise residential built form to the north and west • Religious/Institutional buildings to the east and northeast and • Cultural/civic open area and parking to the south The following pages include current site photos, aerial imagery, and streetscape views showing the Site in relation to the surrounding area. All photos are taken by Giaimo on March 25, 2026 unless otherwise noted. Page 119 of 241 Parcel Municipal Boundary York Region 2025 Imagery RGB Red: Red Green: Green Blue: Blue This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © 2026 The Regional Municipality of York, King's Printer for Ontario 2003-2026 010 20 30 40 m± Map Title Notes Sources: Esri, Vantor, Airbus DS, USGS, NGA, NASA, CGIAR, N Robinson, NCEAS, NLS, OS, NMA, Mosley Str e e t Mosley Str e e t Victoria StreetVictoria Street Victoria Hall Heritage Impact Assessment 3 Giaimo 2 April 2026 Fig. 1.1. Aerial view showing the subject property within the context in dashed lines. Discover York Interactive Map, annotated by Giaimo. Page 120 of 241 Victoria HallVictoria Hall 4 Introduction Fig. 1.2. Bird’s eye view looking west Google Earth. Annotated by Giaimo. Fig. 1.3. Bird’s eye view looking east Google Earth. Annotated by Giaimo. Victoria HallVictoria Hall Page 121 of 241 020’40’40’80’ Victoria Hall Heritage Impact Assessment 5 Giaimo 2 April 2026 Fig. 1.4. Map showing the subject property shown in blue at the southwest corner of Mosley and Victoria Streets within the immediate context Town of Aurora Zoning, annotated by Giaimo. Fig. 1.5. 1981 survey of Plan 65R-4553 (cropped), with the subject property annotated in blue. Page 122 of 241 6 Introduction Fig. 1.6. North (principal) elevation facing Mosley Street Fig. 1.7. East elevation facing Victoria Street Page 123 of 241 Victoria Hall Heritage Impact Assessment 7 Giaimo 2 April 2026 Fig. 1.8. South elevation Fig. 1.9. West elevation Page 124 of 241 8 Introduction Fig. 1.10. Looking north along Victoria Street, photographed from the building’s side, with the building itself out of frame and St. Andrew’s Presbyterian Church at right. Fig. 1.11. Looking south along Victoria Street, with Victoria Hall to the right and the Aurora Town Square located further south behind it. Page 125 of 241 Victoria Hall Heritage Impact Assessment 9 Giaimo 2 April 2026 Fig. 1.12. Looking west along Mosley Street and the neighbouring residences. Fig. 1.13. Looking southeast from Mosley Street towards Victoria Street, with Holy Forty Martyrs ahead and Victoria Hall on the right. Page 126 of 241 10 Introduction 1.4 HERITAGE STATUS Victoria Hall, also known as the Disciples of Christ Church, is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act by Town of Aurora By-law 5081-08.R. The designation identifies the property as having historical, associative, architectural, and contextual value. 1.5 CONTACTS Heritage Consultant: Joey Giaimo, OAA, MRAIC, CAHP Giaimo 213 Sterling Road, Suite 204 Toronto, ON M6R 2B2 e. joey@giaimo.ca t. 289-326-3233 x3 Page 127 of 241 Victoria Hall Heritage Impact Assessment 11 Giaimo 2 April 2026 2 - SITE HISTORY & DESIGN As the property is a designated heritage resource with an established Statement of Cultural Heritage Value and defined heritage attributes, a comprehensive historical research component was not required by the Town. Accordingly, the following provides a concise contextual overview to support an understanding of the property and to inform the assessment of potential impacts associated with the proposed development. The Town of Aurora is located within the traditional and treaty lands of Indigenous peoples who have stewarded this area for generations. The Town of Aurora is part of the treaty lands of the Mississaugas and Chippewas, recognized through Treaty #13 as well as the Williams Treaties of 1923. Prior to European settlement, this broader area formed part of long-standing Indigenous cultural landscapes, movement routes, and relationships to land and water. European settlement in the area that became Aurora followed the opening of Yonge Street northward in the 1790s. A small hamlet developed around the intersection of Yonge Street and Wellington Street, and by the early nineteenth century the area had begun to emerge as a local service and commercial centre. The community was name Aurora in 1854, incorporated as a village in 1863, and later became a town in 1888. As Aurora developed through the nineteenth century, the historic core expanded around Yonge Street and its side streets, with institutional, commercial, residential, and religious buildings contributing to a compact town centre. Mosley Street formed part of this evolving urban fabric east of Yonge Street and within walking distance of Aurora’s historic commercial core. Victoria Hall’s location reflects this period of town-building, when churches and civic institutions were established close to one another and became anchors of community life. The Site’s present context continues to reflect this historic pattern of development. The property at 27 Mosley Street is contextually linked to a historic concentration of public, religious, and community uses in downtown Aurora. As identified in the designation by-law, the building is one of a number of public and religious institutions and public spaces within the blocks bounded by Larmont Street, Mosley Street, and Metcalfe Street that have made the area a community focal point for more than a century. This broader setting contributes to Victoria Hall’s contextual value and helps explain its continued importance beyond its original ecclesiastical use. The surrounding neighbourhood evolved over time from a mixed nineteenth-century settlement pattern into a more defined civic and institutional area. While individual uses changed, the Site remained associated with public life and community gathering. This continuity of public and community use is an important aspect of the building’s heritage significance. Page 128 of 241 12 Site History & Design Victoria Hall was constructed in 1883 as a church building for the local Disciples of Christ congregation. It is a small-scale institutional building that remained associated with the congregation until it was sold in 1922. Thereafter, it served a variety of community-oriented functions under Town ownership, including use as a Health Hall, the Aurora Public Library, and a public meeting hall. These successive uses reflect the adaptability of the building and its long-standing place in the civic life of Aurora. In 1951, it was purchased from the Public School Board for use as the town public library, as well as later images showing its continued public use in the 1950s and during Old Home Week in 1963. These references indicate that the building underwent functional changes over time while maintaining its recognizable historic form. Fig. 2.1. 1950s, Aurora Library Source: Heritage Designation Brief, September 2008. Fig. 2.2. Victoria Hall, Built 1883 Fig. 2.3.  1963, Old Home Week Headquarters, Aurora centennial. Source: Heritage Designation Brief, September 2008. Page 129 of 241 Victoria Hall Heritage Impact Assessment 13 Giaimo 2 April 2026 Fig. 2.4. 1951, northeast corner of the building, during the period it served as the public library. Source: Heritage Designation Brief, September 2008. Fig. 2.5. Present-day image of the northeast corner; the exterior remains largely unchanged. Page 130 of 241 14 Policy Framework 3 - POLICY FRAMEWORK 3.5.2 PARKS CANADA STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR THE CONSERVATION OF HISTORIC PLACES IN CANADA Parks Canada’s Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada provides nationally recognized guidance for decision-making when planning for, intervening on, and using historic places. The document establishes a consistent conservation framework and is widely used as a benchmark for assessing proposed interventions to heritage properties. In the context of this HIA, the Standards and Guidelines provides an appropriate framework for evaluating the compatibility of proposed restoration, rehabilitation, and new servicing interventions at Victoria Hall. 3.5.3 ONTARIO PLANNING ACT AND PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT (2024) The Planning Act identifies “the conservation of features of significant architectural, cultural, historical, archaeological or scientific interest” as a matter of provincial interest under section 2(d). Planning authorities are required to have regard to matters of provincial interest in carrying out their responsibilities under the Act. The Provincial Planning Statement, 2024 came into effect on October 20, 2024 and replaced both the 2020 Provincial Policy Statement and A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2019. It provides province-wide land use planning direction and is to be applied in its entirety. Section 4.6 of the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024 provides direction regarding cultural heritage and archaeology. Policy 4.6.1 states that The following section contains a summary of all relevant in-force and emerging policy and guideline documents that relate to the Site. 3.5.1 ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT & ONTARIO REGULATION 9/06 The Ontario Heritage Act is the principal provincial legislation for the identification, protection, and conservation of cultural heritage resources in Ontario. The Act enables municipalities to designate individual properties under Part IV, designate heritage conservation districts under Part V, maintain a municipal heritage register, and enter into heritage easement agreements. Victoria Hall is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. Evaluation for cultural heritage value or interest under the Ontario Heritage Act is guided by Ontario Regulation 9/06, which sets out the prescribed criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest. A property may be designated under section 29 of the Act if it meets one or more of the prescribed criteria. Victoria Hall is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. Page 131 of 241 Victoria Hall Heritage Impact Assessment 15 Giaimo 2 April 2026 protected heritage property, which may contain built heritage resources or cultural heritage landscapes, shall be conserved. Policy 4.6.4 states that planning authorities shall not permit development and site alteration on adjacent lands to protected heritage property unless the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved. Policy 4.6.5 requires early engagement with Indigenous communities and that their interests be considered when identifying, protecting, and managing archaeological resources, built heritage resources, and cultural heritage landscapes. The following concepts, as defined in the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024, are fundamental to understanding the conservation of cultural heritage resources in Ontario: • Built heritage resource means a building, structure, monument, installation, or any manufactured or constructed part or remnant that contributes to a property’s cultural heritage value or interest. • Conserved means the identification, protection, management, and use of built heritage resources, cultural heritage landscapes, and archaeological resources in a manner that ensures their cultural heritage value or interest is retained. • Heritage attributes means, as defined under the Ontario Heritage Act, the attributes of the property, buildings, and structures that contribute to their cultural heritage value or interest. 3.1 YORK REGION OFFICIAL PLAN The Town of Aurora is within York Region and is subject to the York Region Official Plan 2022, Office Consolidation June 2024. The Regional Official Plan provides the upper-tier planning framework for growth management and community planning to 2051. It recognizes York Region’s cultural heritage, including heritage buildings, cultural landscapes, and archaeological resources, as part of the Region’s local identity. The Plan also establishes a framework for more detailed planning to be carried out through local municipal official plans and secondary plans. In this context, the York Region Official Plan provides broad policy support for the identification and conservation of cultural heritage resources, while more specific heritage conservation direction for this project is provided through the provincial framework and the Town of Aurora’s heritage policies and guidelines. 3.2 TOWN OF AURORA OFFICIAL PLAN The Town of Aurora’s Updated Official Plan was approved by York Region in May 2024, subject to minor modifications, and is the current municipal official plan framework for the Town. Aurora’s Heritage Planning division manages the Aurora Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest, processes heritage designations under Parts IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act, and processes heritage permit applications. Aurora’s heritage policy framework supports the conservation of significant heritage resources and allows the Town to require a Heritage Impact Assessment and a Restoration/Conservation Plan for development proposals or other land use planning proposals that may affect a designated or significant heritage resource or a Heritage Conservation District. The Town’s current Official Plan also prioritizes on-site retention and integration of heritage resources, with adaptive re-use identified as a preferred approach before considering relocation. Page 132 of 241 16 Policy Framework 3.3 TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS The Town’s Heritage Impact Assessments and Conservation Plans Guide provides local guidance on when an HIA or Conservation Plan may be required and how such studies should be prepared. The Guide notes that the Town may require a Heritage Impact Assessment and Restoration/Conservation Plan for development proposals that may potentially affect a designated or significant heritage resource or Heritage Conservation District. As such, the Guide is directly relevant to the preparation of this HIA and to the Town’s review of proposed alterations to Victoria Hall. For this Site, the above policy framework supports an approach centered on retention, adaptive re-use, conservation of identified heritage attributes, and the careful design of any new interventions so that the cultural heritage value of Victoria Hall is conserved. Page 133 of 241 Victoria Hall Heritage Impact Assessment 17 Giaimo 2 April 2026 4 - CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE Victoria Hall, also known as the Disciples of Christ Church, is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. It was designated by the Town of Aurora under By-law 5081-08.R on November 10, 2008 (please refer to Appendix B). The following Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest is reproduced from Schedule “B” of the designation by-law. 4.1 STATEMENT OF CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE OR INTEREST “Victoria Hall” also known as “The Disciples of Christ Church” has excellent cultural heritage value. The building is a good and rare example of a smaller church building built in the Gothic Revival Style. For most of the 20th Century, the former church has served a variety of local functions and has been an important part of community life in Aurora. Historical or Associative Value The building at 27 Mosley Street has historical value in its association with the Disciples of Christ Church for whom the structure was built, and the Town of Aurora for which it has served a number of capacities since it was sold by the Disciples of Christ Church in 1922 including the Health Hall, The Aurora Public Library and a public meeting hall. Architectural Value The building at 27 Mosley Street has architectural value as an example of a modest, Gothic Revival Style Church built of local yellow brick in the late 19th Century. Distinctive features include its pointed gothic arches over the windows and door and projecting buttresses. Contextual Value 27 Mosley Street is of contextual value as one of a number of public and religious institutions and public spaces located within the blocks bounded by Larmont Street, Mosley Street and Metcalfe Street which have made the area a community focal point for more than a century. Page 134 of 241 18 Cultural Heritage Value 4.2 DESCRIPTION OF HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES The Description of Heritage Attributes includes the following heritage attributes and applies to all elevations and the roof including all facades, entrances, windows, chimneys, and trim, together with construction materials of wood, brick, stone, plaster parging, metal and glazing, their related building techniques and landscape features: Attribute to be Conserved: • Victoria Hall also known as "The Disciples of Christ Church" 27 Mosley Street. • Exterior Elements of the Attribute to be Conserved: Exterior Elements • Front gable roof with steep Gothic pitch • Gothic wood pointed sash windows on the side and front elevations • Historic sills • Buttresses at the sides and front of Victoria Hall • Front projecting entranceway with Gothic point above the doorway that originally contained a window with intricate tracery. • Yellow brick exterior • Datestone • Remnants of the historic doorway Interior Elements • Side trim and wainscoting. Page 135 of 241 Victoria Hall Heritage Impact Assessment 19 Giaimo 2 April 2026 5 - BUILDING CONDITION ASSESSMENT 5.1 LIMITATIONS & EXTENT The material in this report reflects the opinion of Giaimo at the time of the site visit. The descriptions and observations are solely based on physical evidence reviewed during the site visits. In addition, invasive, physical, or destructive testing on or off site was not undertaken prior to developing this assessment. The observations included in this assessment may change following receipt of supplementary information, further reviews, and any additional coordination with stakeholders and consultants involved in this project. The review was targeted toward visible elements of the building. The following aspects are excluded: • Detailed survey; • Reviewing and summarizing of past reports and studies; • Review of existing building conditions in concealed or inaccessible areas; • Roof membranes; • Investigations or exploratory work; • Laboratory analysis of building components; • Study on the types and conditions of the building structure; • Study on the types and conditions of mechanical and electrical systems; • Building Code and/or regulation compliance analysis; • Hazardous materials review and/or characterization, or analysis of air quality or potential contamination (asbestos, molds, etc.); and • Review of any components that are not specifically identified as being included in the mandate. 5.2 METHODOLOGY This assessment is based on a 25 March 2026 site visit to review and evaluate the building condition. The observations are high level and based on a visual review of the building; no intrusive investigation was undertaken. The exterior review was conducted from grade. The roof was viewed only from grade. The interior review was visual and conducted in accessible spaces only. Some existing conditions might not have been observed. The visual review completed included the exterior masonry, doors, windows, and visible components of the roof, as well as the interior of the building. The building components were graded using the following assessment system; • Good: The assembly or component is mainly intact and is at minor risk of damage or deterioration due to normal service conditions (e.g. environment, loading) in the short term (1 to 5 years) • Fair: The assembly or component is compromised and is at risk of damage or deterioration due to normal service conditions (e.g. environment, loading) in the short term (1 to 5 years) • Poor: The assembly or component is lost or at considerable risk of loss due to normal service conditions (e.g. environment, loading) in the short term (1 to 5 years) Page 136 of 241 20 Building Condition Assessment 5.3 BUILDING ASSESSMENT 5.3.1 EXTERIOR Victoria Hall is a modest single-storey Gothic Revival building of buff yellow brick on a stone foundation, with a steep front gable roof and pointed-arch openings. The north elevation is the principal façade and includes the projecting entrance, datestone, front buttresses, and the strongest expression of the building’s Gothic Revival character. The east and west elevations are longer side elevations defined by pointed wood sash windows, historic sills, buttresses, and brick masonry walls on a low foundation. The south elevation is simpler and more secondary in character, though it remains part of the overall historic form of the building. Overall, Victoria Hall appears to be in fair to good condition. The building retains substantially all identified exterior heritage attributes. The most notable issues are localized rather than systemic and are concentrated at the buttresses, window and door arches, mortar joints, foundation repairs, painted wood sills, portions of the eaves and fascia, and the altered main entrance. Masonry The buff brick masonry appears to be in generally good condition overall, with several localized areas of fair to poor deterioration. Areas of concern include parging and deterioration primarily at the buttresses, chipped and cracked brick units, cracking at select window arches on the east and west elevations, cracking beneath the first-bay sill on the west elevation, cracking at the main entrance arch, and localized brick spalling, including at the base of the entrance. There are also areas of widespread unsympathetic mortar repairs, localized mortar loss, and cement-based repairs at portions of the foundation, particularly on the west elevation. The rubblestone foundation appears to require repointing. Future masonry repair and repointing should be sympathetic to the historic masonry in material, profile, and finish. Overall, the masonry may be characterized as generally good, with localized areas of fair to poor condition where cracking, parging, spalling, or incompatible repair is concentrated. Windows & Doors There are three pairs of pointed arch windows with exterior storms on west and east elevations. There are two additional pointed arch windows on the principal elevation placed on either side of the entrance. The windows appear to be original, though the upper glazing varies, with decorative patterned glass in some openings and plain glass in others, which may indicate later replacement of select units. All windows have been sealed shut. Weathering is most evident at the wood sills, which are painted and are overall in good to fair condition, with peeling and flaking paint and signs of deterioration. The main entrance has been altered through replacement of the door and removal or concealment of the transom. Archival photographs indicate that the original entrance composition included a decorative transom and a double-leaf door arrangement, and this historic configuration appears to be recoverable at least in part. Overall, the openings can be described as good, with the main entrance in fair condition due to alteration and possible concealed deterioration. Woodwork Painted rafter tails and eaves appear to be generally in good condition, with only select areas of weathering. The rear elevation soffit and fascia appear to have been replaced or covered with aluminum, which suggests earlier alteration and loss of original material in that area. Any surviving wood elements should be carefully inspected during detailed design so that repair can be prioritized over replacement where feasible. Page 137 of 241 Victoria Hall Heritage Impact Assessment 21 Giaimo 2 April 2026 Roof The roof is currently finished in asphalt shingles, which appears to be a later roofing material and may not reflect the original historic roof finish. The roof over the main portion of the building seems to be in fair condition, however, the roof at the principal elevation entrance is in poor condition with evidence of biological growth on asphalt shingles and lifting. 5.3.2 INTERIOR The building seems to be used as storage currently. The interior has been modified over time, with a dropped ceiling concealing the roof structure. The flooring material is vinyl tiles with areas of lifting and damage. The wainscoting, a heritage attribute, is painted and overall, in good condition. The rear addition is not finished and serves a utilitarian purpose. Page 138 of 241 22 Building Condition Assessment Fig. 5.3. West elevation, typical buttress condition and localized masonry weathering Fig. 5.2. West Elevation, buttress with parging, staining, and localized deterioration Fig. 5.1. West elevation showing overall wall condition Fig. 5.4. Front entrance, cracking and deterioration at base of entrance Fig. 5.5. Front entrance, asphalt shingle roof at the front entrance in poor condition and evidence of biological growth Fig. 5.6. Front entrance, parging and deterioration at junction with brick masonry Page 139 of 241 Victoria Hall Heritage Impact Assessment 23 Giaimo 2 April 2026 Fig. 5.7. Northwest corner, downspout discharge at foundation with localized masonry deterioration Fig. 5.9. Northeast corner, condition of lower buff brick wall and downspout area Fig. 5.8. Foundation and lower wall showing brick deterioration, and incompatible repair Fig. 5.10. Front entrance, penetrations in the wall Fig. 5.11. Mortar loss and cracking at the foundation stone, brick weathering Page 140 of 241 24 Building Condition Assessment Fig. 5.12. Eaves, soffit, and downspout showing existing rainwater management and roof edge Fig. 5.15. Masonry cracking at the pointed window arch Fig. 5.13. Window sill and jamb showing weathering, and localized deterioration Fig. 5.16. Localized brick spalling and mortar deterioration at base Fig. 5.14. East elevation, buttresses with parged finish Fig. 5.17. West elevation, buttress with parging and localized deterioration at lower portion Page 141 of 241 Victoria Hall Heritage Impact Assessment 25 Giaimo 2 April 2026 Fig. 5.18. Main hall side trim, and wainscoting Fig. 5.20. Exposed services, and insulated ceiling assembly against historic brick wall Fig. 5.19. Existing rear elevation addition, ancillary space showing alterations, and exposed utilities Fig. 5.21. Close-up of pointed window opening Fig. 5.22. Cracking at the pointed window arch visible at majority of the openings Fig. 5.23. Interior wood wainscoting Page 142 of 241 26 Proposed Work The proposal includes rehabilitation of the existing designated heritage building, a new addition and service space at the south elevation, and an accessible entrance sequence designed by CS&P Architects Inc. The proposal retains the historic building while introducing new work in a contemporary architectural language. As shown in the ground floor plan dated April 2, 2026, the primary entrance is proposed through the new addition rather than through the historic entrance on Mosley Street. The plan shows an accessible ramp at a 1:12 slope with a total length of 8.45 metres leading to an elevated entrance level of +0.70. The historic Mosley Street entrance is shown as an exit in the current plan. The scheme illustrates a new entrance addition as a lightweight, transparent volume set against the existing buff brick heritage building. 6 - PROPOSED WORK Fig. 6.1. Rendering illustrating the proposed south elevation addition, proposed stairs and ramp. CS&P Architects Inc The addition appears to be predominantly glazed, with a flat roof and narrow-profile framing, allowing the existing form, brickwork, and steep gable of Victoria Hall to remain visually legible behind it. The new work reads as clearly contemporary and distinguishable from the historic structure. Within the existing building, the north end is partitioned to include two new washrooms along the east side and an additional room to the west, without obstructing the north entrance. The existing doorway between the current addition and the main building will be widened. Additionally, an original infilled opening at the southeast corner will be reinstated to improve flow between the new addition and the building. Overall, the current proposal seeks to support the long-term use of Victoria Hall while maintaining the existing heritage building as the defining built form on the site. Page 143 of 241 M O S L E Y S T R E E T V I C T O R I A S T R E E T+0.0+0.70 REDUCED TOWN SQUARE PARKING (2 SPACES REMOVED) BF WR WR PRIMARY ENTRANCE EXIT RAMP 1:12 (8.3%) Total Length 8.45m +0.70 +0.0 EXISTING BUILDING 1,260 SF NEW ADDITION 233 SF SERVICE EXISTING SIDEWALKEXISTING SIDEWALK VICTORIA HALL - GROUND FLOOR PLAN 25 Mosley St, Aurora, ON L4G 1R2 2026-04-02 1:150 NProposed interventions Modified openings Victoria Hall Heritage Impact Assessment 27 Giaimo 2 April 2026 Fig. 6.2. Proposed ground floor plan illustrating a new primary entrance addition, ramp and stairs at the south elevation, and the addition of two washrooms at the north end. Issued April 2, 2026 by CS&P Architects Inc., annotated by Giaimo. Page 144 of 241 28 Assessment of Impact The proposed design is expected to have a minor impact on Victoria Hall’s cultural heritage value. The following table identifies and assesses possible effects of the proposal on the building, and the second evaluates changes to identified heritage attributes (Statement of Cultural Heritage Value provided in Section 4). Overall, the current proposal conserves the cultural heritage value of Victoria Hall. The main areas requiring careful resolution through detailed design are the interface between the new glazed addition and the existing brick building and the treatment of interior heritage attributes that may be obscured by the proposed design. Section 8 of this report provides mitigation strategies to minimize any potential impact on the cultural heritage values and heritage attributes of the property. 7 - ASSESSMENT OF IMPACT Page 145 of 241 Victoria Hall Heritage Impact Assessment 29 Giaimo 2 April 2026 DIRECT AND/OR INDIRECT ADVERSE IMPACTS LEVEL OF IMPACT (POTENTIAL, NONE, MINOR, MODERATE, OR MAJOR) RATIONALE Destruction of any, or part of any, significant heritage attributes or features None The original portion of the building is proposed to be retained in its entirety. While the existing rear elevation addition will be removed and the current doorway leading from the addition to the main building widened, these interventions do not lead to the destruction of any heritage attributes. Alteration that is not sympathetic, or is incompatible, with the historic fabric and appearance. Minor The proposed rear addition replaces a previous addition that does not contain any heritage attributes. Furthermore, the addition is contemporary, visually distinguishable, and sympathetic to the historic building. Shadows created that alter the appearance of a heritage attribute or change the viability of an associated natural feature or planting, such as a garden. None The proposal does not involve a large new volume or substantial increase in building height. The new glazed entrance element is low and lightweight, and is not expected to create meaningful shadow impacts on identified heritage attributes. Isolation of a heritage attribute from its surrounding environment, context or a significant relationship. None Victoria Hall will remain in its historic location and continue to contribute to the surrounding cluster of civic, public, and religious buildings identified in the designation by-law. Direct or indirect obstruction of significant views or vistas within, from, or of built and natural features. None The new glazed entrance addition will alter the perception of the elevation. However, because the addition is visually light and largely transparent, the historic form and profile of Victoria Hall are expected to remain legible. A change in land use (such as rezoning a church to a multi-unit residence) where the change in use negates the property’s cultural heritage value. Potential/ Minor No specific tenant or final use has been determined at this time. While a change from the building’s former community and institutional uses may introduce some potential for impact, continued active use is anticipated to support the long-term conservation and viability of the property. Land disturbances such as a change in grade that alters soils, and drainage patterns. Minor The proposed accessible entrance sequence and associated site work will require localized intervention at grade. The changes appear limited in extent. Page 146 of 241 30 Assessment of Impact HERITAGE ATTRIBUTE IMPACT Front gable roof with steep Gothic pitch Direct adverse: None anticipated based on the current proposal, as the overall building form and steep front gable roof are proposed to be retained. Indirect adverse: N/A Positive: The proposal retains the building in situ and supports its continued use, which helps conserve its overall form. Gothic wood pointed sash windows on the side and front elevations Direct adverse: None anticipated, as the current proposal does not indicate changes to the pointed sash windows or historic sills. Indirect adverse: N/A Positive: The proposal supports ongoing conservation of these elements, including repair and replacement of exterior storm units where required by a qualified heritage contractor. Historic Sills Buttresses at the sides and front of Victoria hall Direct adverse: N/A Indirect adverse: N/A Positive: The buttresses will be restored through removal of parging, replacement of masonry and repointing as required. Front projecting entranceway with Gothic point above the doorway that originally contained a window with intricate tracery Direct adverse: N/A Indirect adverse: Minor. The new entrance addition and revised circulation sequence alter how the historic entrance is experienced. In the proposed design, the historic primary entrance is utilized as an exit. Positive: The main entrance will be restored through asphalt replacement, repair of deteriorated rafter trails, and replacement of damaged masonry. Yellow brick exterior Direct adverse: N/A Indirect adverse: N/A Positive: The project supports masonry repair and conservation, including treatment of cracked units, parging, and incompatible mortar repairs. Datestone Direct adverse: N/A Indirect adverse: N/A Positive: N/A Remnants of historic doorway Direct adverse: N/A Indirect adverse: N/A Positive: As part of the restoration efforts, the existing covering at the transom can be removed to investigate whether original material remains beneath. [Interior] Side trim and wainscoting Direct adverse: Minor. Based on the current floor plan, the interventions at the north end of the building will obscure some of the interior side trim and wainscoting. Direct adverse: N/A Positive: N/A Page 147 of 241 Victoria Hall Heritage Impact Assessment 31 Giaimo 2 April 2026 8.1 CONSERVATION APPROACH Section 7 of this report identified that the current proposal conserves the cultural heritage value of Victoria Hall, with limited and generally minor impacts that have been addressed through the sensitive design of the interventions and can be further mitigated through the strategies outlined below. The main considerations relate to the interface between the proposed glazed entrance addition and the existing heritage building, the treatment of interior heritage attributes, and the final placement and visual treatment of any new mechanical elements. This section outlines the conservation approach and mitigation strategies recommended to guide the project team in conserving the property’s cultural heritage value and heritage attributes. The selected conservation treatment for this project is rehabilitation, with selective restoration of specific heritage attributes where sufficient physical and archival evidence exists. The Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (S&Gs), describes rehabilitation as: The action or process of making possible a continuing or compatible contemporary use of a historic place or an individual component, while protecting its heritage value. Rehabilitation is the appropriate primary treatment to allow continued contemporary use of the building, together with a new entrance addition and accessible entry sequence. Selective restoration remains appropriate for certain heritage attributes, including masonry repairs, removal of unsympathetic parging and mortar repairs, investigation and possible recovery of the historic north entrance transom and door composition, repair of wood sills and trim, and compatible roof replacement where required. 8 - CONSERVATION AND MITIGATION STRATEGIES The required conservation work should be implemented through a coordinated drawing package and trade specifications prepared as part of the project documentation. 8.2 MITIGATION STRATEGIES Documentation Prior to any construction or conservation work, the existing building should be comprehensively documented through measured drawings, current photography, and targeted recording of heritage attributes that may be affected by the proposed work including the wainscoting. Qualified heritage contractor/trades Exterior restoration work and any repair of historic fabric should be undertaken by a qualified heritage contractor or appropriate heritage tradespersons. This is particularly important for masonry repointing, selective brick replacement, repair of painted wood sills, investigation of the historic entrance transom, and any restoration of the entrance composition. Masonry conservation The buff brick masonry, buttresses, arches, and foundation should be repaired using methods and materials that are sympathetic to the historic masonry in material, profile, texture, and finish. Unsympathetic mortar repairs, parging, and localized cementitious repairs should be removed where appropriate and replaced with more compatible repair work. Selective brick replacement should be limited to units that are cracked, spalled, or deteriorated beyond reasonable repair. Particular attention should be given to the buttresses, cracks at the window arches, cracking at the main entrance arch, areas of mortar loss, localized brick spalling at the entrance base, and the rubblestone foundation. Page 148 of 241 32 Conservation and Mitigation Strategies Windows, sills, and wood elements Existing pointed sash windows, historic sills, rafter tails, and other surviving wood elements should be retained and repaired where feasible. Repair should be prioritized over replacement, and any replacement of exterior storm units or localized deteriorated wood elements should be limited to what is necessary and carried out in kind or with a physically and visually compatible material. Painted wood sills showing peeling, flaking, or weathering should be repaired and repainted as part of the conservation work. North entrance restoration The historic north entrance should be conserved and, where feasible, selectively restored. The interior plywood at the transom should be removed to confirm whether the original transom survives behind the later covering. The entrance composition, including the transom and door arrangement, should be restored in a manner consistent with the building’s Gothic Revival character. Archival images referenced in Section 2 can be used to guide this work. Roof and water management The asphalt shingles at the front entrance porch is recommended to be replaced in kind. Eavestroughs and downspouts should also be replaced throughout the building as required using compatible profiles and detailing. New glazed addition and interface with the heritage building The proposed glazed entrance addition is designed in a contemporary language, visually light, compatible with the heritage building and it maintains the existing form, buff brick masonry, steep gable, and heritage attributes of Victoria Hall. The interface between the addition and Victoria Hall should be detailed with care, with particular attention to materials, proportions, and reversibility. Mechanical interventions Any proposed mechanical elements, including intake and exhaust air grilles, should be located in the least visually prominent areas and should avoid heritage attributes. Their number and size should be minimized, and penetrations through historic fabric should be limited where feasible. New mechanical elements should be physically and visually compatible with, subordinate to, and distinguishable from the heritage resource, consistent with Standard 11 of the S&Gs. Where such elements must be introduced at the roof or façade, they should be integrated in a manner that minimizes visibility from the public realm and avoids disruption to the building’s roof profile and overall heritage character. Interior heritage attributes Based on the current floor plan, some of the wainscoting may be obscured by the new room and washrooms at the north end. Elsewhere in the building, historic wainscoting should be retained and conserved where possible. Page 149 of 241 Victoria Hall Heritage Impact Assessment 33 Giaimo 2 April 2026 This report finds that the proposed development described in Section 6 conserves the cultural heritage value of Victoria Hall while supporting its continued use. The proposed development represents minimal to minor and acceptable impact on the designated heritage resource. Victoria Hall will be retained in situ, and its cultural heritage value will continue to be expressed through the conservation of its historic form, buff brick masonry, pointed openings, buttresses, roof profile, datestone, and other identified heritage attributes. While the proposal includes a new glazed entrance addition and accessibility upgrades, these interventions can be accommodated in a manner that remains compatible with the heritage resource, provided the mitigation measures outlined in Section 8 are implemented. The proposed work also creates an opportunity to address existing areas of deterioration through appropriate restoration and rehabilitation work, including masonry repair, removal of unsympathetic parging, repair of wood elements, and selective restoration of the north entrance where feasible. It is recommended that mitigation and conservation measures be integrated into the proposed approach. Conservation measures should be incorporated into a coordinated drawing package with outline specifications to guide implementation and, if required, support a Heritage Permit application. All conservation work should be implemented by qualified heritage contractors. 9 - CONCLUSION Page 150 of 241 34 Sources Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism, Ontario Heritage Tool Kit. 2025. Ontario Provincial Policy Statement. 2024. Parks Canada, Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, 2nd edition. 2010. Seaman, Michael, Heritage Designation Brief - Victoria Hall and Disciples of Christ Church. September 2008. Town of Aurora Official Plan. 2024. York Region Official Plan. 2022. 10 - SOURCES Page 151 of 241 Victoria Hall Heritage Impact Assessment 35 Giaimo APPENDICES Giaimo, established in 2015, is a Toronto-based architecture firm integrating design and heritage conservation. We specialize in developing contextual and creative solutions within existing buildings, fostering environmentally, socially, and culturally sustainable places through adaptive reuse, renovations, interventions, and integrating new with old. As architects, designers, and heritage specialists, we have over two decades of experience in all project stages, including research, heritage assessments, feasibility studies, concept design, detailed design, and construction. Collectively our staff of ten have worked on hundreds of projects, ranging from housing and offices to museums and community spaces, and have been honoured with numerous awards, including the Lieutenant Governor’s Ontario Heritage Award for Excellence in Conservation, the Canadian Architect Awards of Excellence, and the Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals Award. Collaboration is at the core of our studio, and we actively engage in Canada’s architectural culture through mentoring, teaching, research, publishing, volunteering, and exhibitions. Joey Giaimo, MRAIC, OAA, CAHP, is founding Principal at Giaimo and brings more than 25 years of experience in the architecture and heritage professions, including an extensive portfolio in integrating design and conservation. He is a registered Architect (OAA) and a professional member of CAHP. He currently lectures on heritage conservation and teaches undergraduate and graduate design studios at Toronto Metropolitan University’s Department of Architectural Science, with an emphasis on conservation and adaptive reuse. He has presented his work at conferences and exhibitions including AZURE’s Human/Nature, the Society for the Study of Architecture in Canada, A - PROJECT PERSONNEL the Association for Preservation Technology, and the National Trust for Canada. Joey's approach to architecture sources the value and characteristics of existing buildings and spaces. This process recognizes and records the state of things as they are, and intervenes with them in respectful and sensitive ways. Sara Shemirani, BArchSc, CAHP, is an Associate at Giaimo. She is an architectural designer and heritage professional (CAHP) with over five years of experience in design and conservation projects across Ontario. Sara holds a Bachelor of Architectural Science from Toronto Metropolitan University. Her work spans residential renovations and heritage projects across multiple project stages, as well as the design of exhibitions and heritage interpretation installations. Passionate about heritage conservation, Sara volunteered with the non-profit Architectural Conservancy Ontario (ACO), where she most recently served as an ACO NextGen Vice Chair. As a TMU alumna, Sara contributed to the Department of Architectural Science as a member of the Equity, Diversity & Inclusion (EDI) Committee from 2022 to 2025, collaborating with students, faculty, and staff to identify, evaluate, and address EDI barriers inside and outside the classroom. Page 152 of 241 36 Heritage Designation By-Law B - HERITAGE DESIGNATION BY-LAW Page 153 of 241 Page 154 of 241 Page 155 of 241 Page 156 of 241 Page 157 of 241 Page 158 of 241 VICTORIA HALLCommittee of the Whole Meeting, May 12, 2026Page 159 of 241 Victoria Hall – Committee of the Whole MeetingMay 2026 | 1Site & ContextAerial view showing the subject property, Victoria Hall also known as “The Disciples of Christ Church” at 27 Mosley Street, within the context in dashed blue line.Page 160 of 241 Site & ContextMay 2026 | 2Victoria Hall – Committee of the Whole MeetingBird’s eye view looking eastVictoria HallPage 161 of 241 Building ElevationsMay 2026 | 3Victoria Hall – Committee of the Whole MeetingNorth (principal) elevation facing Mosley StreetEast elevation facing Victoria StreetSouth elevation West elevationPage 162 of 241 Site History & DesignMay 2026 | 4Victoria Hall – Committee of the Whole Meeting1950s, Aurora Library1963, Old Home Week Headquarters1951, building serving as a public libraryPage 163 of 241 Description of Heritage AttributesMay 2026 | 5Victoria Hall – Committee of the Whole MeetingAttributes to be Conserved:Exterior Elements•Front gable roof with steep Gothic pitch•Gothic wood pointed sash windows on the side and front elevations•Historic sills•Buttresses at the sides and front of Victoria Hall•Front projecting entranceway with Gothic point above the doorway that originally contained a window with intricate tracery•Yellow brick exterior•Datestone•Remnants of the historic doorwayInterior Elements•Side trim and wainscotingPage 164 of 241 Victoria Hall – Committee of the Whole MeetingMay 2026 | 6Exterior ConditionDownspout discharge at foundation with localized masonry deteriorationCementitious repair and deterioration at junction with brick masonryGeneral view of gable end and rooflinePage 165 of 241 Victoria Hall – Committee of the Whole MeetingMay 2026 | 7Exterior ConditionCondition of lower buff brick wall and downspout areaMasonry cracking at the pointed window archParged buttressesPage 166 of 241 Victoria Hall – Committee of the Whole MeetingMay 2026 | 8Interior ConditionExposed services, and insulated ceiling assembly against historic brickCurrent south elevation additionMain hall showing window openings, side trim, and wood wainscotingClose-up of pointed window openingPage 167 of 241 Victoria Hall – Committee of the Whole MeetingProposed WorkMay 2026 | 9Proposed ground floor plan illustrating a new primary entrance addition, ramp and stairs at the south elevation, and the addition of two washrooms at the north end.Modified OpeningsProposed AdditionPage 168 of 241 Victoria Hall – Committee of the Whole MeetingProposed WorkMay 2026 | 10Rendering illustrating the proposed south elevation addition and stairs.Page 169 of 241 Victoria Hall – Committee of the Whole MeetingPotential Impacts on Heritage AttributesMay 2026 | 11HERITAGE ATTRIBUTEIMPACT (Direct adverse, Indirect adverse, or Positive)Front gable roof with steep Gothic pitchDirect adverse: None. The overall building form and steep front gable roof are proposed to be retained.Indirect adverse: N/APositive: The proposal retains the building in situ and supports its continued use, which helps conserve its overall form.Gothic wood pointed sash windows on the side and front elevationsDirect adverse: None. The proposal does not indicate changes to the pointed sash windows or historic sills.Indirect adverse: N/APositive: The proposal supports ongoing conservation of these elements, including repair and replacement of exterior storm units where required by a qualified heritage contractor.Historic SillsButtresses at the sides and front of Victoria hallDirect adverse: N/AIndirect adverse: N/APositive: The buttresses will be restored through removal of parging, replacement of masonry and repointing as required.Front projecting entranceway with Gothic point above the doorway that originally contained a window with intricate traceryDirect adverse: N/A Indirect adverse: Minor. The new entrance addition and revised circulation sequence alter how the historic entrance is experienced. In the proposed design, the historic primary entrance is utilized as an exit. Positive: The main entrance will be restored through asphalt roof shingle replacement, repair of deteriorated rafter trails, and replacement of damaged masonry. Page 170 of 241 Victoria Hall – Committee of the Whole MeetingPotential Impacts on Heritage Attributes (continued)May 2026 | 12HERITAGE ATTRIBUTEIMPACT (Direct adverse, Indirect adverse, or Positive)Yellow brick exteriorDirect adverse: N/AIndirect adverse: N/APositive: The project supports masonry repair and conservation, including treatment of cracked units, parging, and incompatible mortar repairs.Datestone Direct adverse: N/AIndirect adverse: N/A Positive: N/ARemnants of historic doorwayDirect adverse: N/AIndirect adverse: N/A Positive: As part of the restoration efforts, the existing covering at the transom can be removed to investigate whether original material remains beneath.[Interior] Side trim and wainscoting Direct adverse: Minor. Based on the current floor plan, the interventions at the north end of the building will obscure some of the interior side trim and wainscoting.Direct adverse: N/APositive: N/APage 171 of 241 Victoria Hall – Committee of the Whole MeetingConclusionMay 2026 | 13The proposed design represents minimal to minor and acceptable impact on the designated heritage resource. Victoria Hall will be retained in situ, and its cultural heritage value will continue to be expressed through the conservation of its historic form, buff brick masonry, pointed openings, buttresses, roof profile, datestone, and other identified heritage attributes.Page 172 of 241 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Town of Aurora Committee of the Whole Report No. PDS 2 6 -0 45 Subject: Heritage Permit Application HPA-2026-01 – 15375 Yonge St. Prepared by: Adam Robb, Manager, Policy Planning and Heritage Department: Planning and Development Services Date: May 12, 2026 Recommendation 1. That Report No. PDS26-045 be received; and 2. That Heritage Permit Application HPA-2026-01 for 15375 Yonge Street be approved, subject to future site plan review and approval. Executive Summary This report seeks Council’s approval of Heritage Permit Application HPA-2026-01, which is intended to facilitate a single physician healthcare office at 15375 Yonge Street.  15375 Yonge Street is located within the Town’s Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District and designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act  The Owner proposes alterations to the property which include demolition of the rear non-heritage garage  The proposal was supported by the Heritage Advisory Committee and will also still be subject to site plan review Background 15375 Yonge Street is located within the Town’s Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District and designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act 15375 Yonge Street was built circa 1885 and is located within the Town’s Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District. The property is a corner lot, located at the Page 173 of 241 May 12, 2026 2 of 5 Report No. PDS26-045 northeast intersection of Yonge and Maple Streets. The main orientation of the dwelling is towards Yonge Street, with rear access available from Maple Street. Notable heritage features of the property include the brick exterior, gable roofline and entryways, and general ‘L’ shaped design. Analysis The Owner proposes alterations to the property which include demolition of the rear non- heritage garage The owner is proposing the following alterations to facilitate a single physician healthcare office at the property: - Removal/demolition of the rear non-heritage garage - Removal of a smaller tree on the property - New healthcare office signage on Yonge Street - Repainting of the façade to a compatible classical cream/white colour - Enhancement of the Maple Street entryway with a new overhead doorway gable - Replacement of the rear, non-heritage windows - Parking re-configuration - Interior alterations as part of the change in use - Roofing and shingle replacement The majority of the proposed work is generally considered minor and either involves interior renovations or general building maintenance/enhancement. However, the requirement for a demolition permit for the rear garage on the property triggers the need for Council approval of the subject heritage permit application. The rear garage is believed to be a non-original feature of the property and is not considered to be a heritage asset. Being a change of use to a healthcare office, the owner no longer requires the garage in its existing capacity/function. Removal of the garage would provide more space/efficiency for parking as well as improved client accessibility. The new exterior area is also intended to be finished with a complementary wood board and batten siding. To facilitate the parking configuration, the owner has indicated that a smaller tree will require removal. The tree is considered smaller relative to the larger, more mature trees on the property, which the owner has indicated are all intended to remain. The subject proposal is still required to undertake a site plan review process as well, which will be circulated to Parks staff, and continued evaluation of the trees and administration of Page 174 of 241 May 12, 2026 3 of 5 Report No. PDS26-045 any required removal/replanting and conditions as part of the development agreement will occur as the more detailed site plan process advances. The proposal was supported by the Heritage Advisory Committee and will also still be subject to site plan review The current proposal was reviewed by the Heritage Advisory Committee at its meeting held on April 13, 2026. The Committee expressed support for the proposal, noting that the owner is pursuing complementary alterations that will be sympathetic to the heritage features of the property, and that the demolition of the rear non-heritage garage will improve overall access and efficiency for the site. The proposal will also be subject to a site plan review process to ensure the coordination and functionality of the site, as well as the requirement to enter into a site plan agreement with the Town. Additionally, the owner will also be required to seek any necessary required parking relief through the minor variance process. Heritage Permit approval is being sought first in order to ensure Council’s review and support of the proposal from a design and heritage perspective, prior to the more detailed technical site plan and minor variance processes then being pursued. The appropriate condition of approval has also been implemented to merge these processes, being that heritage permit approval remains subject to site plan review and approval as well. Advisory Committee Review Initially, the owner prepared plans which were reviewed by the Heritage Advisory Committee at its meeting held on February 9, 2026. These plans did not originally propose demolition of the rear garage. The Committee posed questions to the owner to ensure compatibility of materiality and colours and also provided comments on the configuration of the site. The Owner then revised their plans, recognizing the need to improve the proposed parking efficiency and configuration on site, while also addressing comments from the Committee. The owner is committed to using a classical colour for the property and complementary materials like wood board and batten siding. The Heritage Advisory Committee then reviewed these latest plans at its meeting held on April 13, 2026. The Heritage Advisory Committee was very supportive of the proposal, seeing it as an improved configuration of the site that also respects the heritage features of the dwelling. Page 175 of 241 May 12, 2026 4 of 5 Report No. PDS26-045 Legal Considerations Under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, any developments or alterations that would potentially impact the heritage character of a property located within a Heritage Conservation District requires Council’s consent. This legislative requirement is implemented in the Town of Aurora through the process of a Heritage Permit Application, which is subject to Council’s approval after consultation with the Heritage Advisory Committee. Council must make a decision on a heritage permit application within 90 days after the notice of receipt is served on the applicant, otherwise Council shall be deemed to have consented to the application. The 90-day deadline for this permit application is July 15, 2026. Council may extend the review period of a heritage permit application in a heritage conservation district without any time limit under the Ontario Heritage Act provided it is agreed upon by the owner. If Council refuses the application or makes the permit subject to terms and conditions that are not agreeable by the owner, the owner may appeal the decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal. Financial Implications None. Communications Considerations None. Climate Change Considerations None. Link to Strategic Plan Supporting an Exceptional Quality of Life for All by satisfying the requirements under Celebrating and Promoting our Culture. Alternative(s) to the Recommendation 1. That Heritage Permit Application HPA-2026-01 be refused. Page 176 of 241 May 12, 2026 5 of 5 Report No. PDS26-045 Conclusions Heritage Permit Application HPA-2026-01 intends to facilitate a single physician healthcare office at 15375 Yonge Street and proposes alterations including the removal of the rear garage, which requires Council approval. Attachments Attachment 1 – Location Map Attachment 2 – Proposed Site Plan and Elevations Attachment 3 – Tree Imagery Previous Reports Memorandum to the Heritage Advisory Committee dated April 13, 2026. Pre-submission Review Agenda Management Team review on April 23, 2026 Approvals Approved by Marco Ramunno, Director, Planning and Development Services Approved by Doug Nadorozny, Chief Administrative Officer Page 177 of 241 15375 Yonge StreetNortheast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District BoundaryPage 178 of 241 1A1.0 SCALE: 1:100SITE PLANGENERAL NOTES:JAMES DOUGLAS ARCHITECT6335 17th SideroadSchomberg, ONL0G 1T0647-406-7160jamie.douglas.arch@gmail.comSITE PLAN &SITE STATISTICSA1.015375 YONGE STREETAURORA, ONAttachment 2Page 179 of 241 MECHANICALB04CRAWLSPACE (ASSUMED - INACCESSIBLE)B01STORAGEB02CRAWLSPACEB03ENTRY / WAITING105RECEPTION106TREATMENT ROOM 2109EXAMINATION ROOM 2102ENTRY FOYER101EQUIP RM107TREATMENT ROOM 1108EXAMINATION ROOM 1103BF WC104GENERAL NOTES:15375 YONGE STREETAURORA, ONTARIOJAMES DOUGLAS ARCHITECT6335 17th SideroadSchomberg, ONL0G 1T0647-406-7160jamie.douglas.arch@gmail.comKEY PLANPROPOSED BASEMENT PLANAND GROUND FLOOR PLANA 2.01A2.0 1/4" = 1'-0"PROPOSED BASEMENT PLAN2A2.0 1/4" = 1'-0"PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLANPage 180 of 241 OFFICE204OFFICE201WASHROOM202STAFF ROOM203GENERAL NOTES:15375 YONGE STREETAURORA, ONTARIOJAMES DOUGLAS ARCHITECT6335 17th SideroadSchomberg, ONL0G 1T0647-406-7160jamie.douglas.arch@gmail.comKEY PLANPROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN& CHANGE OF USE NOTESA 2.11A2.1 1/4" = 1'-0"PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN2A2.1 N.T.S.CHANGE OF USE NOTES3A2.1 N.T.S.CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLIESPage 181 of 241 15375 YONGE STREETSIGNAGEGENERAL NOTES:15375 YONGE STREETAURORA, ONTARIOJAMES DOUGLAS ARCHITECT6335 17th SideroadSchomberg, ONL0G 1T0647-406-7160jamie.douglas.arch@gmail.comKEY PLANELEVATIONSA 3.11A3.1 1/4" = 1'-0"WEST ELEVATION2A3.1 1/4" = 1'-0"SOUTH ELEVATION3A3.1 1/2" = 1'-0"PROPOSED NEW SITE SIGNPage 182 of 241 WAITING ROOM105RECEPTION106GENERAL NOTES:15375 YONGE STREETAURORA, ONTARIOJAMES DOUGLAS ARCHITECT6335 17th SideroadSchomberg, ONL0G 1T0647-406-7160jamie.douglas.arch@gmail.comKEY PLANELEVATIONSENTRY SECTIONA 3.21A3.2 1/4" = 1'-0"EAST ELEVATION2A3.2 1/4" = 1'-0"NORTH ELEVATION3A3.2 1/4" = 1'-0"ENTRY SCHEMATIC SECTIONPage 183 of 241 Proposed to RemainProposed to Remove Attachment #3Page 184 of 241 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Town of Aurora Committee of the Whole Report No. PDS 2 6 -0 46 Subject: Request for Sign Bylaw Authorization for a Mural Sign – The Lind Realty Team Inc. – 15105 Yonge Street Prepared by: William Jean, Manager – Building Division/CBO Department: Planning and Development Services Date: May 12, 2026 Recommendation 1. That Report No. PDS26-046 be received; and 2. That the request for authorization to permit a Mural Sign at 15105 Yonge Street be approved. Executive Summary The purpose of this report is to consider the request to maintain an existing mural sign on the wall facing north at 15105 Yonge Street.  Mural Signs as per the Town’s Sign Bylaw No. 5840-16 must be approved by Town Council Background The applicant is requesting to maintain an existing mural sign at 15105 Yonge Street (see Attachment 1). The following is the definition of a Mural Sign. There is a Town mural located to the left of this mural sign. “Mural Sign” shall mean any type of display or artistic endeavour applied as paint, film or any other covering to any external wall or other integral part of a building or structure Page 185 of 241 May 12, 2026 2 of 4 Report No. PDS26-046 Analysis Mural Sign as per the Town’s Sign Bylaw No. 5840-16 must be approved by Town Council. Although this request for Council approval of a permit would not fall into the category of variance request, criteria used to assess sign variances provide a good guide for assessment of such permit applications. Section 4.10 of Sign By-law No. 5840-16, as amended, states that when considering an application for a variance to the Sign Bylaw, criteria such as consistency with the architectural features of a building, consistency with the character of the neighbourhood, impact on the adjacent properties or general public and impact on safety, traffic and accessibility is to be used to determine approval. Similarly, these criteria could be used to assess any signs requiring Council approval. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed mural meets the evaluation criteria. It is recommended the mural be approved. If Council approves the request for the amendment to the Town Sign Bylaw, the applicant shall obtain a Sign Permit. There are also advertising signage on the wall with the mural sign. The advertising signage meets the sign face area of the Sign Bylaw. Advisory Committee Review Not applicable Legal Considerations In accordance with Section 5.1 (j) of the Town’s Sign By-law No. 5840-16, mural signs are permitted in the Town, subject to Council approval and compliance with all applicable provisions of the Sign By-law. The applicant is required to obtain a permit in accordance with section 4.1 of the By-law, which is being requested pursuant to this report, and be approved or refused by Council. Financial Implications There are no financial implications as a result of this report Page 186 of 241 May 12, 2026 3 of 4 Report No. PDS26-046 Communications Considerations There are no communications considerations. Climate Change Considerations Not applicable Link to Strategic Plan This report supports the Strategic Plan goal of Support an Exceptional Quality of life for All by reviewing and identifying safety matters Alternative(s) to the Recommendation 1. Council may deny the request for the Sign Bylaw authorization for the mural. Conclusions A Mural sign must be authorized by Council under Section 5.1 of the Town’s Sign Bylaw No. 5480-16. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed mural meets the Evaluation Criteria when evaluating any deviations to the Town’s Sign Bylaw. It is recommended the mural be approved. Attachments Attachment 1 – Picture of sign Attachment 2 – Site Plan Previous Reports Not applicable Pre-submission Review Agenda Management Team review on April 23, 2026 Page 187 of 241 May 12, 2026 4 of 4 Report No. PDS26-046 Approvals Approved by Marco Ramunno, Director, Planning and Development Services Approved by Doug Nadorozny, Chief Administrative Officer Page 188 of 241 Attachment 1 Page 189 of 241 Attachment 2 Page 190 of 241 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Town of Aurora Committee of the Whole Report No. PDS26 -048 Subject: 2025 Financial Reporting for the Aurora Economic Development Corporation Prepared by: Andrew Poray - Manager, Economic Development Department: Planning and Development Services Date: May 12, 2026 Recommendation 1. That Report No. PDS26-048 be received for information. Executive Summary To support transparency and accountability for the use of public funds. This report is provided in response to Council direction requiring a consolidated annual financial summary of AEDC recommended activities that have a cost starting in 2025.  In 2023 Council approved an annual budget increase from the economic development reserve to support strategic economic development programming.  All AEDC associated financial activity is administered and audited through the Town’s financial framework.  Total AEDC related expenditures for the year 2025 were $11,868.00. Background The AEDC was created to strategically advise the Town of Aurora on Economic Development objectives as defined in its Terms of Reference: “…the AEDC is responsible for working with community interested parties to develop and maintain an Economic Development Strategy for the Town of Aurora to guide economic development activities and investment over the short, medium and long term.” Page 191 of 241 May 12, 2026 2 of 4 Report No. PDS26-048 The Aurora Economic Development Corporation was structured as a not‑for‑profit corporation operating under the provisions of the Municipal Act, 2001 and the Not‑for‑Profit Corporations Act, 2010 (“ONCA”). The AEDC does not independently control expenditures or issue audited financial statements as all recommended initiatives and activities related to the AEDC are administered by the Economic Development Division of the Planning and Development Services Department and audited through the Town’s financial framework. Analysis In 2023 Council approved an additional annual budget to support strategic economic development programming. To support the delivery of the actions identified under the Economic Development Action Plan, Council approved an addition of $100,000 to the Economic Development division’s annual operating budget in 2023. All AEDC associated financial activity is administered and audited through the Town’s financial framework. The AEDC provides strategic recommendations for initiatives in support of the Town’s economic development objectives. Upon approval by the Manager of Economic Development, each AEDC recommendation is funded through the Economic Development Division’s annual operating budget and audited as part of the Town’s financial framework. Total AEDC related expenditures for the year 2025 were $11,868.00. The breakdown of AEDC related expenditures for the year 2025 were as follows: Two-day strategic working session $ 10,504.00 Meeting expenses $ 1,364.00 Total $ 11,868.00 Advisory Committee Review Not Applicable Page 192 of 241 May 12, 2026 3 of 4 Report No. PDS26-048 Legal Considerations The AEDC has a unique corporate structure, in that it is incorporated pursuant to the Municipal Act, 2001 and ONCA. As a corporation, the AEDC is also governed by their By- law No.1, being a By-law relating generally to the transaction of the affairs of the AEDC. This By-law states that the Treasurer of the AEDC is the Treasurer of the Town and that the Treasurer shall have the custody of the funds and securities of the AEDC. Financial Implications There are no financial implications as a result of this report. Communications Considerations There are no communication considerations as a result of this report. Climate Change Considerations No climate change considerations associated with receiving this report. Link to Strategic Plan Promoting economic opportunities that facilitate the growth of Aurora as a desirable place to do business by working with the Aurora Economic Development Corporation to create, implement, and regularly update a community wide Economic Development Strategic Plan. Alternative(s) to the Recommendation 1. Council may provide alternate direction. Page 193 of 241 May 12, 2026 4 of 4 Report No. PDS26-048 Conclusions This report provides a consolidated summary of Town managed financial activity related to AEDC supported initiatives for the 2025 fiscal year. The information presented is intended to support Council’s review and facilitate transparency regarding the use of public funds. Attachments None Previous Reports None Pre-submission Review Agenda Management Team review on April 23, 2026 Approvals Approved by Marco Ramunno, Director, Planning and Development Services Approved by Doug Nadorozny, Chief Administrative Officer Page 194 of 241 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Town of Aurora Committee of the Whole Report No. PDS2 6 -0 49 Subject: Applications for Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision Eric and Theresa Jacquelene Liversidge and Livewell on Wellington General Partners Ltd. 1426 and 1452 Wellington Street East Lots 1 and 2, Registered Plan 525 and Block 1, Plan 65M-4819 File Numbers: OPA-2025-10, ZBA-2025-09, ZBA-2022-06, SUB-2026- 01 Prepared by: Felix Chau, Planner Department: Planning and Development Services Date: May 12, 2026 Recommendation 1. That Report No. PDS26-049 be received; and 2. That Official Plan Amendment application OPA-2025-10 be approved to redesignate the subject lands from “Community Commercial” to “Medium-High Density Residential”; and 3. That Zoning By-law Amendment application ZBA-2025-09 be approved to rezone the subject lands from “Rural (RU)” to “Townhouse Dwelling Residential (R8) Exception Zone (582)” and “Townhouse Dwelling Residential (R8) Exception Zone (583)”; and 4. That Zoning By-law Amendment application ZBA-2022-06 be approved to rezone the subject lands from “Townhouse Dwelling Residential (R8) Exception Zone (551)” to “Townhouse Dwelling Residential (R8) Exception Zones (583)”; and 5. That Draft Plan of Subdivision application SUB-2026-01 be approved as shown in Figure 6, subject to the conditions outlined in Appendix ‘A’; and Page 195 of 241 May 12, 2026 2 of 16 Report No. PDS26-049 6. That the implementing By-laws for the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications be brought forward to a future Council meeting for enactment; and 7. That 84 persons worth of servicing allocation be granted to the subject lands to implement the land use permissions. Executive Summary The purpose of this report is to seek Council’s approval on four Planning Act applications over 1426 and 1452 Wellington Street East (Figure 1). The purpose of the four planning applications is to facilitate the development of 42 standard townhouse units and 32 townhouse units on a private road.  To redesignate 1426 Wellington Street East from “Community Commercial” to “Medium-High Urban Residential”.  To rezone the lands at 1426 Wellington Street East to “Residential R8” Exception Zone (582) and (583) and Residential (R8) Exception Zones (583) at 1452 Wellington Street East.  The comprehensive residential development consists of 74 townhouse dwelling units (42 standard townhouse units and 32 back-to-back townhouse units) with access onto Wellington Street East and the Stronach Aurora Recreation Complex.  The proposed applications are consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement and the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan.  The proposed applications align with the Town Official Plan’s vision of the local corridor.  The proposed Zoning By-law changes are consistent with the surrounding approved zoning by-law amendments.  The proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision is considered appropriate and represents an orderly development.  Staff have no objection in principle to the proposed private road connection to the Stronach Aurora Recreation Complex (SARC) driveway. Page 196 of 241 May 12, 2026 3 of 16 Report No. PDS26-049  The conceptual development will require Council to assign an additional 84 persons worth of servicing allocation. Background Application History On 1452 Wellington Street East (eastern portion of the site), Council approved Official Plan Amendment (OPA-2022-04), Zoning By-law Amendment (ZBA-2022-06) and Draft Plan of Subdivision (SUB-2022-01) applications in October 2023. Subsequently, a Site Plan Application (SP-2022-10) was approved in July 2024 (Figure 9) to facilitate the development of 30 standard townhouse units accessed through a private common elements condominium road, with right-in right-out access from Wellington Street East. The Applicant (Livewell) started site servicing works but did not sign a Development Agreement to begin construction of the dwelling units. Since this development on the eastern portion of the site was originally proceeding on its own, it did not contemplate vehicular connections to the western parcel at 1426 Wellington Street East. In February and April of 2026, Livewell submitted a new development plan consisting of both 1452 and 1426 Wellington Street East. Livewell proposes one comprehensive development that will facilitate 20 standard townhouse units and 16 back-to-back townhouse units on 1426 Wellington Street East and 22 standard townhouse units and 16 back-to-back townhouse units on 1452 Wellington Street East. To facilitate the above comprehensive development, Livewell applied for the subject four planning applications to redesignate, rezone and confirming the land holding boundaries. A statutory Public Planning Meeting was held on March 24, 2026. At this meeting, Council passed a motion to receive Report No. PDS26-027 and to have comments be addressed by Planning and Development Services in a report to a future Committee of the Whole Meeting. This report addresses all comments received and the associated responses. Location / Land Use The subject lands are comprised of 1426 Wellington Street East and 1452 Wellington Street East. The lands are located on the north side of Wellington Street East, west of Leslie Street. Overall, the site is approximately 1.1 hectares (2.7 acres) in size with frontage along Wellington Street East of approximately 137 metres (450 feet) (Figure 1). Page 197 of 241 May 12, 2026 4 of 16 Report No. PDS26-049 The property at 1426 Wellington Street East is currently occupied by one single detached dwelling and an accessory structure in the rear yard. Vehicular access to the detached dwelling is provided via private driveway connecting to Wellington Street East. The property at 1452 Wellington Street East has been serviced in accordance with the approved site plan. However, construction is currently on hold until a decision is made for the subject applications. Surrounding Land Uses The surrounding land uses are as follows: North: Stronach Aurora Recreation Complex (SARC), approved residential development for 345 apartment units (Polo Club), and an institutional use (Northridge Community Church of the Salvation Army) South: Wellington Street East, proposed development at 1289 Wellington Street (ZBA- 2025-07 and SUB-2025-01) for 117 townhouse dwelling units and 8 single- detached dwellings. East: Gas station and Retail with a drive-through, Lesile Street. West: Stronach Aurora Recreation Complex (SARC) and Central York Fire Station. Policy Context Provincial Policies All Planning Act development applications are subject to provincial policies. The Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest. These policies support the development of strong communities through the promotion of efficient land use and development patterns. The Lake Simcoe Protection Plan (LSPP) is a provincial document that provides policies which addresses aquatic life, water quality, water quantity, shorelines and natural heritage, other threats and activities (including invasive species, climate change and recreational activities) and implementation. Town of Aurora Official Plan The lands at 1426 Wellington Street East are currently designated as “Community Commercial” in the Town of Aurora Official Plan. It is the intent of this designation to Page 198 of 241 May 12, 2026 5 of 16 Report No. PDS26-049 promote neighbourhood scale commercial opportunities to service the local community (Figure 2). The lands at 1452 Wellington Street East are designated “Medium-High Density Residential”. The intent of this designation is to provide residential neighbourhoods made up primarily of multi-unit grade-related housing and apartment buildings (Figure 2). Within Schedule “A” of the Official Plan, the subject lands fall within a Local Corridor. Intensification is directed to the Local Corridors, at densities and a scale that is compatible with surrounding areas. Zoning By-law 6000-17, as amended The lands at 1426 Wellington Street East are currently zoned “Rural (RU)” which reflects the historical use of the property (Figure 3). The lands at 1452 Wellington Street East are currently zoned “Townhouse Dwelling Residential (R8) Exception Zone (551)”. This site-specific zoning reflects the approved ZBA-2022-06 from 2023 to facilitate the development of 30 standard Townhouse units. (Figure 3). Reports and Studies The comprehensive list of documents that forms a complete application to the subject Planning applications were detailed in the Public Planning Meeting report PDS26-027. Proposed Applications Proposed Official Plan Amendment To redesignate the lands at 1426 Wellington Street East from “Community Commercial” to “Medium-High Urban Residential”. As shown in Figure 4, the Applicant (Livewell) is proposing to amend the existing Official Plan designation “Community Commercial” to “Medium-High Urban Residential” on the western portion on the subject lands. Page 199 of 241 May 12, 2026 6 of 16 Report No. PDS26-049 Proposed Zoning By-law Amendments To rezone the lands at 1426 Wellington Street East to “Residential R8” Exception Zone (582) and (583) and Residential (R8) Exception Zones (583) at 1452 Wellington Street East. The Applicant proposes to rezone the lands at 1426 Wellington Street East to R8 (582) and R8 (583) (Figure 5). The Applicant also proposes to rezone a portion of the lands at 1452 Wellington Street East to Townhouse Dwelling Residential (R8) Exception Zones (583). The following is a high-level summary of the amendments proposed for both R8(582) and R8(583):  Permit Standard Townhouse built form (R8-582)  Permit Back-to-back Townhouse built form (R8- 583)  Decrease in minimum lot area  Decrease in minimum lot frontage  Decrease in minimum setbacks for all yards  Increase lot coverage  Increase in maximum height  Decrease in minimum visitor parking requirements Proposed Plan of Subdivision As illustrated on Figure 6, the Applicant is proposing to create one development block to facilitate the future development on 1426 Wellington Street East. The purpose of the Draft Plan is to establish the development boundaries and allow the Applicant to apply for Part Lot Control application in the future to create individual townhouse lots. Conceptual Site Plan The comprehensive residential development consists of 74 townhouse dwelling units (42 standard townhouse units and 32 back-to-back townhouse units) with access onto Wellington Street East and the Stronach Aurora Recreation Complex. To date, the Applicant has not submitted a site plan application to advance the conceptual site plan as shown on Figure 7. The conceptual site plan illustrates a comprehensive development which consist of 74 townhouse units on a private condominium road over 1452 and 1426 Wellington Street East. A right-in, right-out vehicular access is proposed on Wellington Street East with a proposed secondary access through the SARC private driveway. As part of the future site plan application, Page 200 of 241 May 12, 2026 7 of 16 Report No. PDS26-049 the Applicant has committed to design and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Wellington Street East and the driveway entrance of the SARC. The comprehensive development will also provide a total of 14 visitor parking spaces located in the centre of the subject lands with no-street parking on site. The standard townhouse along Wellington Street East will features an attached garage at the rear of the property along the private road with the front entrance facing Wellington Street East. Whereas the standard townhouse units along the north end of the site will feature an entrance and garage facing the internal private road with a rear yard. The middle block are the proposed back-to-back townhouses. Each of the back-to-back units feature an attached garage and pedestrian entrance fronting onto the proposed internal private roads. The conceptual building elevation are shown in Figure 8. For reference purposes, the previously approved site plan for 1452 Wellington Street East is shown in Figure 9. Analysis Planning Considerations The proposed applications are consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement and the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan. The proposed Planning applications will establish the development framework to align with the provincial mandates for compact, transit supportive growth while maintaining adherence to the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan. By establishing planning permission to allow for medium density housing, the subject lands align well with the criteria outlined in Section 2.1 and 2.2 of the Provincial Planning Statement. The proposed land use amendment will help facilitate the development of additional housing within a complete community, close to transit, shops, and services. Furthermore, the proposed amendments will optimize the existing municipal infrastructure and address the “missing middle” housing gap, fulfilling the intensification goals of the Provincial housing target. Simultaneously, the Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority (LSCRA) has reviewed the proposed applications in consideration of the LSPP and has no objection to the approval of the subject applications as presented. The subject lands are located outside of the LSRCA regulated limits. Accordingly, no Regulation Permit is required prior to development or site alteration taking place on the subject lands. The subject lands are also free from any natural hazards and are outside of hazardous lands. Page 201 of 241 May 12, 2026 8 of 16 Report No. PDS26-049 The proposed applications align with the Town Official Plan’s vision of the local corridor. Planning Staff are of the opinion that the proposed applications conform to the land use and development policies of the Official Plan and is compatible with the surrounding land uses. The proposal planning applications align with the Official Plan vision of the local corridor. The subject lands are accessible by transit and in close proximity to social and service amenities such as the Stronach Aurora Recreation Complex and represents orderly development along Wellington Street East. The land use permission to allow for residential townhouses supports the mix of housing sizes, densities and prices to meet the needs of current and future residents of Aurora. In order to meet the Town-wide affordable housing target of 25 per cent, Staff encourage all new residential developments to contribute toward achieving the Town’s affordable housing objectives. In keeping with this policy direction, the applicant will work with Town staff through the Site Plan application process to explore opportunities and strategies to support the Town’s affordable housing goals. The proposed Zoning By-law changes are consistent with the surrounding approved zoning by-law amendments. Planning staff are of the opinion that the proposed applications is appropriate and compatible with adjacent and neighbouring development, and that the by-law exceptions are appropriate to implement the Official Plan policies. The following is a table to compare the difference between the parent Townhouse (R8) zoning requirements with the proposed R8 Exception Zones. Parent R8 Zone Requirement Proposed 582 Exception Zone (Standard Townhouse) Proposed 583 Exception Zone (Back to Back Townhouse) Permitted Uses Townhouse Dwelling Units Townhouse Dwelling units Back-to-back Townhouse Dwelling units Lot Area (minimum) 180 m2 per unit 100 m2 per unit 40 m2 per unit Lot Frontage (minimum) 6 m per unit 5.4 m per unit 6.1 m per unit Page 202 of 241 May 12, 2026 9 of 16 Report No. PDS26-049 Parent R8 Zone Requirement Proposed 582 Exception Zone (Standard Townhouse) Proposed 583 Exception Zone (Back to Back Townhouse) Front Yard (minimum) 7.5 m 1.6 m 0.2 m Rear Yard (minimum) 7.5 m 3.5 m 0.0 m Side Yard (minimum) 1.5 m for end units 0.0 m for internal units 0.15 m for end units 0.0 m for internal units 0.35 m for end units 0.0 for internal units Lot Coverage (maximum) 50% 65% 99.5% Height (maximum) 10 m 10.5 m 10.5 m Parking (minimum) 1.5 space / unit 2 spaces / unit 1 space / unit for the block directly abutting the Wellington Street Lot Line 2 spaces / unit 1 space / unit for the northern dwelling units within the middle blocks Visitor Parking (minimum) Min. 20% Visitors Min 10% Visitors Min 10% Visitors Amenity Area (minimum) 18 m2 per unit 2.9 m2 per unit 2.9 m2 per unit Lot Area, Frontage and Setbacks The proposed lot area, frontage and setbacks for both exception zones are designed to create a compact, pedestrian-friendly townhouse form within the local corridor. The Page 203 of 241 May 12, 2026 10 of 16 Report No. PDS26-049 proposed front yard setbacks create a more engaging streetscape, encouraging walking and active transportation. The minimum side yard setback for the standard townhouses of 0.15 metre is a result of pinch point caused by Unit 74. The balance of the end units for the standard townhouses provides sufficient space for pedestrian access and household maintenance on site. The proposed setbacks for all units are sufficient from a functional standpoint within this future condominium complex. Lot Coverage The applicant proposes to increase the maximum lot coverage from 50 per cent to 65 per cent for the standard townhouse dwelling units. Furthermore, a maximum lot coverage for the proposed back-to-back townhouse units is 99.5 per cent, however this is exclusive to one unit only (Unit 20). Two other units exceed 90 per cent lot coverage at 91.5 per cent and 96.1 per cent. The balance of the units ranges from 70 to 90 per cent lot coverage. These changes provide a clear development limit to help maintain a balance between built space and open areas on the property. Engineering Staff reviewed the proposed zoning and in general have adequate space for stormwater considerations. Details related to stormwater management will be reviewed through the site plan process. Building Height The proposed building height of 10.5 metres is to facilitate 3-storey townhouse units. Given that this property is located on a Local Corridor, the maximum height permissible is 4-storeys. Furthermore, the Ontario Land Tribunal previously approved a maximum townhouse height of 11 metres for the development immediately south of the subject lands at 1289 Wellington Street East. This allows the site to be reasonably maximized for the number of dwelling units while providing appropriate living space in each unit. Minimum Parking Standards The applicant proposes the following parking requirements:  Require two parking spaces per unit for the southerly facing units in Blocks B, D, and E; and  Require one parking space per unit for northerly facing units in Blocks B, E and F (Figure 7). Page 204 of 241 May 12, 2026 11 of 16 Report No. PDS26-049 Furthermore, the applicant proposes to reduce the minimum required visitor parking requirements from a minimum of 20 per cent of spaces provided being set for visitor parking to 10 per cent. A total of 136 parking spaces is proposed for the site, and 14 are designated visitor parking spaces located centrally on the site. Supplemented with a Transportation Study, Staff are satisfied with this proposed reduction, as sufficient parking spaces are provided to accommodate all residents and visitors to this development. Amenity Area The minimum standard for amenity area within the zoning by-law of 18 square metres per dwelling unit would render a total required amount exceeding 1,300 square metres. The applicant is providing a shared common outdoor Amenity Area centrally to the development of approximately 220 square metres. This results in a ratio of 2.9 square metres per unit. This amenity area will feature a playground and is sufficient to service the entire development. Additionally, the 22 standard townhouse units at the north of the site all feature private backyard amenity area. The proposal maximizes the usable outdoor space and provides sufficient amenity areas for the development. The proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision is considered appropriate and represents an orderly development. The proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision on 1426 Wellington Street East creates one block in a manner that is appropriate and consistent with the Town’s Official Plan. It is Planning Staff’s opinion that the size and shape of the developable block is appropriate to accommodate the future private internal roads and infrastructures. Additional details related to lot layout, road network, and servicing design will be reviewed at the future Site Plan, Part Lot Control Exemption and Common Elements Condominium application process. This is consistent with the singular block that was previously approved for 1452 Wellington Street East. Town Staff have no objection in principle to the proposed private road connection to the Stronach Aurora Recreation Complex (SARC) driveway Based on the conceptual drawings, Staff have no objection in principle to the proposed private road connection to the existing SARC driveway. Furthermore, this private road connection was presented at the Public Planning Meeting where Council had no issues with the private road connection to the driveway of a municipal building. While this connection is not formally part of the subject land use applications, it has been reviewed at a high level for conceptual feasibility. Further technical details and design Page 205 of 241 May 12, 2026 12 of 16 Report No. PDS26-049 specifications will be thoroughly evaluated during the site plan control stage. This includes any obligations to design and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Wellington Street East and the SARC driveway. The conceptual development will require Council to assign an additional 84 persons worth of servicing allocation. The conceptual development illustrated a total of 42 standard townhouse units and 32 back-to-back townhouse units. The total 74 units would require a total of 165 persons worth of servicing allocation. Since Council had previously assigned 81 persons worth of servicing to the approved site plan application SP-2022-10, the Applicant will only require an additional 84 persons worth of servicing to complete the comprehensive development. Department / Agency Comments The proposed applications were circulated to all internal and external agencies for review and comments. All external agencies and Town staff have completed their review and have no objections to the approval of the subject applications. Further detailed design review will occur through the active Site Plan Application. Public Comments Planning Staff have received comments from the public on the proposed planning application. Below is a summary of all written and verbal comments received at the time of writing this report: Questions/Comments Response Will there be sufficient parking provided on site for residents and visitors? The proposal contemplates 136 parking spaces for the 74 units. Of the 136 parking spaces, 14 are designated for visitors parking. The Town’s Transportation Engineer is satisfied that this is sufficient parking to accommodate the development. Concerns over increased density and the lack of green space The proposed density aligns with the Medium-High Density Residential designation. Furthermore, the property is within a Local Corridor which can accommodate for higher density Page 206 of 241 May 12, 2026 13 of 16 Report No. PDS26-049 residential developments. Green space is provided in a shared amenity area in the centre of the site. Additionally, this property is fronting onto a trail on the south side of Wellington Street East. Pedestrian access to this trail will be enhanced once the SARC and Wellington Street East intersection is signalized. Advisory Committee Review The Town’s Accessibility Advisor reviewed the subject applications on behalf of the Accessibility Advisory Committee and provided no comments as it pertains to the application. Any final review comments that need to be addressed with the Accessibility Advisory Advisor will be done prior to the approval of the Site Plan application. Legal Considerations Liability regarding access through the SARC The proposed access through the SARC driveway presents potential liability considerations for the Town due to the use of Town-owned lands by private traffic. Increased vehicular and pedestrian activity may elevate exposure under the Occupiers’ Liability Act, particularly with respect to traffic safety, pedestrian conflicts, and the condition, design, and operation of municipal property. There are also potential risks associated with traffic operations at the SARC driveway and at Wellington Street East, including queuing, sightlines, and intersection performance, especially as cumulative impacts evolve over time. Staff propose to mitigate these risks by dedicating that part of the parking lot that will be used for the access as a public highway. Another option that may be considered is to use the access through the SARC as an emergency access only. Both options will be further considered as part of the site plan application process. Planning Act Deadlines Subsections 22 (7) and 22 (7.0.2) of the Planning Act states that if Council refuses the Official Plan Amendment application or fails to make a decision on it within 120 days after the receipt of the application, the applicant (or the Minister) may appeal the application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT). Page 207 of 241 May 12, 2026 14 of 16 Report No. PDS26-049 Subsection 34 (11.0.0.0.1) of the Planning Act states that if the passing of a Zoning By- law Amendment also requires an amendment to the Official Plan, and that if both applications are made on the same day, if Council refuses the Zoning By-law Amendment application or fails to make a decision on it within 120 days after the receipt of the application, the applicant (or Minister) may appeal the application to the OLT. The Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Bylaw Amendment applications were received on February 13, 2026, and therefore, the applicant may appeal to the OLT after the date of June 13, 2026. Subsection 51(34) of the Planning Act states that if Council fails to make a decision on the subdivision application within 120 days after the receipt of the application, the applicant may appeal the application to the OLT. The subdivision application was received on April 13, 2026, and therefore, the applicant may appeal to the OLT after the date of August 11, 2026, if no decision is made. If Council approves or refuses the application, then the applicant may appeal to the OLT after receiving notice of Council’s decision. Financial Implications There are no direct financial implications as a result of this report. Communications Considerations On February 26, 2026, a Notice of Complete Application respecting the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application was published in the Auroran Newspaper. On March 5, 2026, Notice of Public Planning Meeting was given by mail to all addressed property owners within a 120-metre radius of the subject lands and posted on the Town’s website. A Notice of the Public Planning meeting sign was also posted directly on the property. On March 12, 2026, Notice of Public Planning Meeting was published in the Auroran Newspaper. Public Meeting notification has been provided in accordance with the Planning Act. On April 28, 2025, by way of email, Interested Parties were notified of this report and the intended May 12, 2026 Committee of the Whole date. Page 208 of 241 May 12, 2026 15 of 16 Report No. PDS26-049 Climate Change Considerations The Official Plan identifies sustainability, energy efficiency, and climate change mitigation as important objectives for new development. Staff will encourage the applicant to include measures such as energy-efficient systems, landscaping, and low- impact stormwater management as part of a future Site Plan Application process. Link to Strategic Plan The proposed applications support the Strategic Plan goal of Supporting an exceptional quality of life for all through its accomplishment in satisfying requirements in the following key objectives within this goal statement: Strengthening the fabric of our community: Through the review and approval of the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision applications, housing opportunities are created that assist in achieving growth targets while providing housing opportunities for everyone. Alternative(s) to the Recommendation 1. Direct staff to report back to another Committee of the Whole Meeting addressing any issues that may be raised at the Committee of the Whole Meeting. 2. Refusal of the application with an explanation for the refusal. Conclusions Planning and Development Services reviewed the proposed Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision applications in accordance with the provisions of the Province, the Town’s Official Plan, Zoning By-law and municipal development standards respecting the subject lands. The proposed applications are in keeping with the development standards of the Town. Any technical revisions to the proposed plans will be reviewed by Town Staff prior to the execution of the site plan agreement. Staff recommends approval of the submitted applications. Page 209 of 241 May 12, 2026 16 of 16 Report No. PDS26-049 Attachments Appendix A – Draft Plan of Subdivision Conditions Figure 1 – Location Map Figure 2 – Existing Official Plan Designation Figure 3 – Existing Zoning By-Law Figure 4 – Proposed Official Plan Amendment Figure 5 – Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Figure 6 – Draft Plan of Subdivision Figure 7 – Proposed Site Plan Figure 8 – Proposed Elevations Figure 9 – Previously Approved Site Plan (1452 Wellington Street East) Previous Reports Report No. PDS26-027 – Public Planning Meeting (March 24, 2026) Pre-submission Review Agenda Management Team review on April 28, 2026 Approvals Approved by Marco Ramunno, Director, Planning and Development Services Approved by Doug Nadorozny, Chief Administrative Officer Page 210 of 241 Schedule “A” CONDITIONS OF DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION APPROVAL Subdivision Application No.: SUB-2026-01 Owner: Eric and Theresa Jacquelene Liversidge (the “Owner”) Address: 1426 Wellington Street East Legal Description: Lots 1 and 2, Registered Plan 525, PIN 03642-0028 (the “Lands”) DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION APPROVAL AND THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL LAPSE ON June 23, 2029, BEING THE EXPIRATION OF THREE (3) YEARS FROM THE DATE OF APPROVAL, unless extended by The Corporation of The Town of Aurora (the “Town”), in its sole discretion, prior to the lapse date. If no extension is granted by the Town prior to the lapse date, the Draft Plan of Subdivision Approval shall be deemed to have expired without further notice. Pursuant to subsection 51(26) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, as amended (the “Planning Act”), as a condition to the approval of the draft plan of subdivision prepared by WAHBA Surveying, dated April 10, 2026 (the “Draft Subdivision Plan”), which is attached as Schedule “B” and which forms part of these conditions for the creation of one Block on the Lands, and which approval is required prior to the final version of the plan of subdivision (the “M-Plan”) being registered on title to the Lands, the Owner of the Lands shall satisfy the following requirements: Planning Division Conditions 1.If approved or requested in writing by the Town, the Owner shall revise the Draft Subdivision Plan to incorporate minor modifications required to implement or reflect the findings or recommendations of studies required as part of these Conditions of Draft Plan of Subdivision Approval, or to ensure appropriate coordination and alignment with existing or planned lots, blocks, streets, services, and/or facilities on adjacent lands. 2.The Owner, at its sole expense, shall submit the following to the Town for review and written approval by the Town’s Planning Division: a)an electronic and hardcopy version of the signed white paper print approved by the Land Registry Office for registration; b)one (1) original mylar; c)two (2) mylar duplicates; and d)three (3) white paper prints, one (1) of which contains an A.O.L.S form. Page 211 of 241 Liversidege SUB-2026-01 Page 2 Conditions of Draft Plan of Subdivision Approval If a version of the M-Plan has previously been provided to the Town, any subsequent version provided shall also be accompanied by a description of all revisions made from the prior version. 3. The Lands shall be: a) appropriately designated in the Official Plan by an official plan by-law that is in effect in accordance with the Planning Act; and b) appropriately zoned by a zoning by-law that is in effect in accordance with the Planning Act, including any terms under which the Town’s Council will consider the removal of a holding “H” symbol, if applicable. Legal Services Division Conditions 4. The Owner, at its sole expense, and to the satisfaction of the Town Solicitor, shall submit the following to the Town for review and written approval by the Town’s Legal Services Division: a) an up-to-date title PIN(s) for the Lands; b) a solicitor’s title opinion regarding the title of the Lands or any portions thereof to be conveyed to the Town, and, if applicable, a solicitor’s undertaking to register a transfer of any easements or conveyances required by the Town immediately following the registration of the M-Plan; c) the final executed version of the M-Plan, and the draft Plan Document as pre- approved by the Land Registry Office; d) the Surveyor’s Frontage and Area Certificate for the M-Plan; and e) a Certificate of Corporate Status for the Owner, and a Clear Certificate regarding a Writ of Execution against the Owner. Finance Department Conditions 5. The Owner shall pay to the Town all outstanding taxes, water rates, and any other lawful rates, levies, assessments, and charges owing to the Town in connection with the Lands. External Agency Conditions 6. The Owner shall submit, to the Town’s Planning Division, written confirmations from the respective external agencies confirming the Owner’s fulfillment of the following conditions of approval: a) York Region Conditions of Approval, attached as Schedule A.1. Page 212 of 241 Liversidege SUB-2026-01 Page 3 Conditions of Draft Plan of Subdivision Approval Clearances • The Town’s Planning Division shall confirm in writing that Conditions 1 to 3 have been fulfilled, stating briefly how each condition has been met, and that all External Agencies have provided written confirmation of the Owner’s fulfilment of their respective conditions of approval. • The Town’s Legal Services Division shall confirm in writing that Condition 4 has been fulfilled, stating briefly how this condition has been met. • The Town’s Finance Department shall confirm in writing that Condition 5 has been fulfilled, stating briefly how this condition has been met. Page 213 of 241 Liversidege SUB-2026-01 Page 4 Conditions of Draft Plan of Subdivision Approval Schedule “A.1” YORK REGION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 214 of 241 Page 8 SUBP.26.A.0015 (SUB-2026-01) ZBA.26.A.0033 (ZBA-2025-09) 1st Submission Condition Letter – 1414 & 1426 Wellington St E Schedule of Pre-Conditions SUB-2026-01 (SUBP.26.A.0015) 1414 & 1426 Wellington St E Town of Aurora Re: Wahba Surveying (Signed April 24, 2026) The following pre-conditions are applicable in the event that the draft plan approval is given prior to Council approval of adequate unrestricted servicing allocation to the subject development: Prior to or concurrent with draft plan approval for any residential units, the owner shall enter into an agreement with the Town of Aurora, which agreement shall be registered on title, committing the owner to: A. Not enter into any agreements of purchase and sale with end users (*) for the subject lands until such time as: a. i. The Council of the Town of Aurora has allocated, within the limit of the Regional capacity assignment, adequate available water and wastewater servicing capacities to the subject development; and, ii. York Region has advised in writing that it is no earlier than twelve (12) months prior to the expected completion of all water and wastewater infrastructure required to support the Region’s capacity assignment pertaining to the Town allocation used for the subject development; or b. the Town approves a transfer of servicing allocation to this development that is not dependent upon the construction of infrastructure; or c. the Regional Commissioner of Public Works and the Town of Aurora confirm servicing capacity for this development by a suitable alternative method and the Town allocates the capacity to this development. AND B.Not enter into any agreements of purchase and sale with non end users for the subject lands unless the agreement of purchase and sale contains a condition that requires the purchaser and any subsequent purchasers to enter into a separate agreement with the Town. This agreement shall be registered on title, committing the owner to the same terms as set out in item A above. Page 215 of 241 Page 9 SUBP.26.A.0015 (SUB-2026-01) ZBA.26.A.0033 (ZBA-2025-09) 1st Submission Condition Letter – 1414 & 1426 Wellington St E 2. Prior to draft plan approval for any residential units, the owner shall enter into an indemnity agreement with York Region, which agreement shall be registered on title, agreeing to save harmless York Region from any claim or action as a result of York Region releasing conditions and pre-conditions of draft approval as part of the draft approval of this Plan of Subdivision, or any phase thereof, including, but not limited to claims or actions resulting from, water or sanitary sewer service not being available when anticipated. The agreement shall include a provision that requires all subsequent purchasers of the subject lands, to enter into a separate agreement with York Region as a condition of the agreement of purchase and sale, agreeing to indemnify York Region on the same terms and conditions as the owner. (*) the term 'end users' for the purpose of the above-noted pre-conditions is defined as the eventual homeowner who is purchasing an individual lot containing a dwelling for the purpose of occupancy. Page 216 of 241 Page 10 SUBP.26.A.0015 (SUB-2026-01) ZBA.26.A.0033 (ZBA-2025-09) 1st Submission Condition Letter – 1414 & 1426 Wellington St E Schedule of Conditions SUB-2026-01 (SUBP.26.A.0015) 1414 & 1426 Wellington St E Town of Aurora Re: Wahba Surveying (Signed April 24, 2026) Conditions of draft approval for the subdivision application have been provided with the decision of Town of Aurora’s to not enter into a subdivision agreement. All requirements and clauses are to be transferred into the site plan agreement. York Region will be party to the site plan agreement. 1. The Owner shall acknowledge to save harmless the Town of Aurora and York Region from any claim or action as a result of water or sanitary sewer service not being available when anticipated. 2. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall provide to the Region the following documentation to confirm that water and wastewater services are available to the subject development and have been allocated by the Town of Aurora: a. A copy of the Council resolution confirming that the Town of Aurora has allocated servicing capacity, specifying the specific source of the capacity, to the development proposed within this draft plan of subdivision. b. A copy of an email confirmation by Town of Aurora staff stating that the allocation to the subject development remains valid at the time of the request for regional clearance of this condition. 3. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall provide an electronic set of the final engineering drawings showing plan and profile views of the water and wastewater infrastructure for the proposed development to Development Services and Infrastructure Asset Management for record. 4. The Region requires the Owner submit a Phase One Environmental Site Assessment (“ESA”) in general accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Protection Act and O. Reg. 153/04 Records of Site Condition, as amended (“O. Reg. 153/04”). The Phase One ESA must be for the Owner’s property that is the subject of the application and include the lands to be conveyed to the Region (the “Conveyance Lands”). The Phase One ESA cannot be more than two (2) years old at: (a) the date of submission to the Region; and (b) the date title to the Conveyance Lands is transferred to the Region. If the originally submitted Phase One ESA is or would be more than two (2) years old at the actual date title of the Conveyance Lands is transferred to the Region, the Phase One ESA will need to be either updated or a new Phase One ESA submitted by the Owner. Any update or new Phase One ESA must be prepared to the satisfaction of the Region and in general accordance with the requirements of O. Reg. 153/04. The Region, at its discretion, may require further study, investigation, assessment, delineation and preparation of reports to determine whether any action is required regardless of the findings or conclusions of the submitted Phase One ESA. The further study, investigation, assessment, delineation and subsequent reports or documentation must be prepared to the satisfaction of the Region and in general accordance with the requirements Page 217 of 241 Page 11 SUBP.26.A.0015 (SUB-2026-01) ZBA.26.A.0033 (ZBA-2025-09) 1st Submission Condition Letter – 1414 & 1426 Wellington St E of O. Reg. 153/04. Reliance on the Phase One ESA and any subsequent reports or documentation must be provided to the Region in the Region’s standard format and/or contain terms and conditions satisfactory to the Region. The Region requires a certified written statement from the Owner that, as of the date title to the Conveyance Lands is transferred to the Region: (i) there are no contaminants of concern, within the meaning of O. Reg. 153/04, which are present at, in, on, or under the property, or emanating or migrating from the property to the Conveyance Lands at levels that exceed the MECP full depth site condition standards applicable to the property; (ii) no pollutant, waste of any nature, hazardous substance, toxic substance, dangerous goods, or other substance or material defined or regulated under applicable environmental laws is present at, in, on or under the Conveyance Lands; and (iii) there are no underground or aboveground tanks, related piping, equipment and appurtenances located at, in, on or under the Conveyance Lands. The Owner shall be responsible for all costs associated with the preparation and delivery of the Phase One ESA, any subsequent environmental work, reports or other documentation, reliance and the Owner’s certified written statement. 5. Upon registration of the plan, the Owner shall convey the following lands to York Region for public highway purposes, free of all costs and encumbrances, to the satisfaction of the Regional Solicitor: a. A widening across the full frontage of the site where it abuts Wellington Street of sufficient width to provide a minimum of 18 metres from the centreline of construction of Wellington Street, and b. A 0.3 metre reserve across the full frontage of the site, except at the approved access location, adjacent to the above noted widening, where it abuts Wellington Street and adjacent to the above noted widening(s). 6. Prior to final approval, the Owner shall provide a solicitor's certificate of title in a form satisfactory to York Region Solicitor, at no cost to York Region with respect to the conveyance of the above noted lands to York Region. 7. The Regional Corporate Services Department shall advise that Conditions 1 to 6 inclusive, have been satisfied. Page 218 of 241 Liversidege SUB-2026-01 Page 5 Conditions of Draft Plan of Subdivision Approval Schedule “B” DRAFT SUBDIVISION PLAN Page 219 of 241 S U R V E Y I N GPage 220 of 241 Page 221 of 241 Page 222 of 241 Page 223 of 241 Page 224 of 241 Page 225 of 241 Page 226 of 241 Page 227 of 241 Page 228 of 241 Page 229 of 241 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Town of Aurora Member Motion Councillor Gallo Re: R.A.I.L. 175 – Commemoration of the Arrival of Rail Service to Aurora To: Mayor and Members of Council From: Councillor John Gallo Date: May 12, 2026 Whereas the arrival of rail service from Toronto to Aurora in 1853 was a defining moment in the Town’s history, contributing significantly to its economic development, population growth, and long-term prosperity; and Whereas the year 2028 will mark the 175th anniversary of this historic milestone, presenting a unique opportunity to celebrate Aurora’s heritage and educate residents and visitors about the Town’s railway history; and Whereas the concept of a “R.A.I.L. 175” commemorative initiative was brought forward by local historian David Heard, reflecting his ongoing contributions to preserving and promoting Aurora’s history; and Whereas the Aurora Historical Society and other community partners have a strong track record of supporting local heritage initiatives through programming, exhibitions, and community engagement; and Whereas the Town’s Museum and Cultural Services division maintains significant archival collections, artifacts, and expertise necessary to support the interpretation and delivery of historical exhibitions and programming; and Whereas the Town of Aurora has previously delivered successful commemorative initiatives, such as the 100th anniversary of the War Memorial, through a coordinated model led by the Museum in collaboration with community partners and stakeholders; and Whereas staff have indicated that the Museum team is already in discussions with neighbouring municipalities and partners regarding this milestone, and that the Town’s Special Events team may also play a supporting role; and Page 230 of 241 R.A.I.L. 175 – Commemoration of the Arrival of Rail Service to Aurora May 12, 2026 Page 2 of 2 Whereas the Town’s Heritage Fund is intended to support initiatives that preserve, promote, and celebrate Aurora’s cultural and historical assets; 1. Now Therefore Be It Hereby Resolved That staff be directed to develop a coordinated plan for the R.A.I.L. 175 commemorative initiative to take place in May– June 2028, recognizing the 175th anniversary of the arrival of rail service to Aurora; and 2. Be It Further Resolved That the Town’s Museum and Cultural Services division be identified as the lead facilitator for the initiative, working in collaboration with David Heard, the Aurora Historical Society, other community partners, neighbouring municipalities, and relevant stakeholders; and 3. Be It Further Resolved That the Town’s Special Events team be engaged in a supporting role to assist with the planning and delivery of community events associated with the initiative; and 4. Be It Further Resolved That staff report back to Council no later than Q2 2027 with a detailed workplan, partnership framework, and budget for the R.A.I.L. 175 initiative; and 5. Be It Further Resolved That, as part of that report, staff include options for funding, including the potential allocation of up to $50,000 from the Town of Aurora Heritage Fund to support the initiative; and 6. Be It Further Resolved That, upon completion of the initiative, staff provide a report to Council summarizing outcomes, community participation, partnerships, and financials. Page 231 of 241 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Town of Aurora Member Motion Mayor’s Office Re: Heritage Conservation District Street Signage To: Members of Council From: Mayor Tom Mrakas Date: May 12, 2026 Whereas the Town of Aurora designated the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act on June 13, 2006, through By-law 4809-06.D; and Whereas the designation of the District has been instrumental in guiding the preservation of this part of Town, known as one the first major residential expansions of Aurora spurred by the arrival of the railway in the mid-1800s; and Whereas 2026 marks the 20-year anniversary of this designation and the creation of the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District; and Whereas section 5.6 of the District Plan encourages the installation of Heritage District street name signs to help promote the identification of the Heritage Conservation District, including having signage be a distinct shape or utilizing a logo while also being compatible with the style and character of the area; and Whereas promotion of the Heritage Conservation District through dedicated signage will further enhance awareness and encourage the preservation and celebration of this distinct and historically and culturally significant part of Town; 1. Now Therefore Be It Hereby Resolved That Council direct staff to evaluate the design options and costs for new street name signs throughout the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District area and report back to Council; and 2. Be It Further Resolved That Council further direct staff to evaluate opportunities for additional gateway signage or features for the District area through the ongoing Wayfinding Signage capital project. Page 232 of 241 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Town of Aurora Memorandum Mayor’s Office Re: York Regional Council Highlights of April 23, 2026 To: Members of Council From: Mayor Mrakas Date: April 28, 2026 Recommendation 1. That the York Regional Council Highlights of April 23, 2026, be received for information. Attachments 1. York Regional Council Highlights of April 23, 2026 Page 233 of 241 1 Monday, April 27, 2026 York Regional Council – Thursday, April 23, 2026 Live streaming of the public session of Council and Committee of the Whole meetings is available on the day of the meeting from 9 a.m. until the close of the meeting. Past sessions are available at york.ca/CouncilAndCommittee York Region maintains excellence in drinking water quality with 100% compliance scores York Region is reporting its 2025 Drinking Water Systems Performance Report, highlighting continued high compliance scores of 100% in Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks drinking water systems. 2025 highlights also include: •All inspections completed by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks received 100% compliance scores •Drinking water quality test results complied with the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002 •Three multi-site external audits in 2025 led to successful re-accreditation to the Ministry’s Drinking Water Quality Management Standard and to ISO 14001 and ISO 9001, with zero non- conformities identified •Risk mitigation included quarterly operational risk reviews, emergency exercises and a March 2026 annual management review covering system and regulatory performance, audit results, legal changes, customer feedback and operational risks Additional drinking water information is available at york.ca/DrinkingWater and york.ca/OpenData York Region Transit investments deliver results with expanded service and smarter schedules York Regional Council received the 2025 York Region Transit (YRT) System Performance Report, highlighting strong ridership growth, reliable service and continued innovation across the network. YRT (2025) System Performance highlights include:  •Ridership reached 23.7 million in 2025 •Ridership increased 15.4% on York Region Transit On-Request (153,035 riders) and Mobility On-Request services (482,099 riders) •On-time performance reached 94%, exceeding targets; continued investments in asset management are required to maintain service reliability while travel patterns change and demand increases •Key initiatives delivered included 112 service improvements, expansions to On-Request services and implementing several technology and asset management-related programs to provide customers with safe and reliable transit services The report also highlights the impact of the Province’s One Fare Program, with 9.51 million cross- boundary trips between YRT and the TTC, representing 40.1% of total ridership. YRT’s Page 234 of 241 2 2026 to 2030 Business Plan was also released, outlining strategies to meet evolving transit needs while prioritizing financial responsibility, equity, safety and customer experience. YRT continues to expand its zero-emission fleet and enhance service based on customer feedback, with more than 1,900 comments informing planned improvements for 2026. Highway 413 and Bradford Bypass projects moving ahead in collaboration with York Region Regional Council received an update on two transportation projects: Highway 413 and Bradford Bypass from Malvika Rudra, Assistant Deputy Minister, Major Highway Projects Division with the Ontario Ministry of Transportation. Both projects are currently in detail design, with construction anticipated to begin in 2026 in phased delivery strategies. When complete, the Highway 413 project will connect Highway 400 in The Regional Municipality of York to Highway 401 and Highway 407 Express Toll Route (407 ETR) in Halton and Peel Regions. A construction contract tender is scheduled for Summer 2026, with construction anticipated to start in Fall 2026. The Bradford Bypass is a priority 16.3-kilometre controlled-access four-lane freeway connecting Highway 400 in Simcoe County and Highway 404 in York Region. Major construction is expected to begin in Spring 2026 and be completed by 2030. The Province has engaged Regional and local municipal staff throughout planning for the Bradford Bypass and Highway 413. The Bradford Bypass and Highway 413 are included in York Region’s Transportation Master Plan, providing mobility for longer distance travelers and goods movement, reducing traffic on Regional roads. Staff will continue to engage the Province and report to Council at key project milestones. 2025 Public Works research and innovation update Regional Council received an update on York Region Public Works’ Research and Innovation program, which applies leading-edge research to address municipal challenges such as aging infrastructure, climate change and the need for cost-effective service delivery. In 2025, Public Works advanced more than 42 projects supporting cost savings, process improvements, safer public spaces and improved service delivery. Research focus areas included: • Sustainable transportation: Leveraging data to understand travel patterns in York Region • Healthy communities: Proactive wastewater sampling to understand key sources of microplastics • Circular economy: Testing new materials and exploring incinerator ash waste in road asphalt • Reducing emissions: Strategic research to assess cost effective options for greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater • Assessing infrastructure: Testing innovative non-invasive water and wastewater pipe inspection technologies, including free-floating CCTV and vibration/acoustic analysis Through strong collaborations with academics, government and non-governmental organizations, consultants and tech vendors, York Region leverages funding and expertise to develop innovative solutions. Page 235 of 241 3 York Region, with Regional Council endorsement and in partnership with the Canadian Water Network, is seeking Federation of Canadian Municipalities funding to deliver a Water and Wastewater Scenario Planning pilot. The initiative would support risk-informed climate adaptation by assessing future impacts on Regional systems, strengthening planning capacity and advancing long-term infrastructure resilience. A list of projects and highlights is available through the 2025 Public Works Research and Innovation Update. York Region ensures safety and reliability of infrastructure assets, enhancing quality of life Regional Council received the 2026 Corporate Asset Management Progress Report, providing an update on the condition of York Region’s infrastructure assets, including buildings, facilities, roads, fleet vehicles, information technology and living assets like street trees. Key highlights in the report include: • Replacement cost of the portfolio increased from $28.8 billion to $31.1 billion, an increase of $2.3 billion or 8% from 2023, mostly due to inflation • Overall asset conditions remain positive, with 89% of the portfolio in fair or better condition • Approximately 95% of full lifecycle infrastructure needs are funded over the 10-year period, leaving an unfunded gap of $955 million, reduced from $1.1 billion previously reported; the variance reflects what is needed to maintain service levels and funding currently available or expected • In 2024, 87% of the capital plan was delivered across the corporation to build new infrastructure and maintain existing assets in a state of good repair The Region continues to be a leader in asset management by reducing overall asset lifecycle cost while balancing intergenerational equity. The full report and 2024 Corporate Asset Management Plan is available on the Region's Corporate Asset Management webpage. York Region revising speed limits to improve safety York Region is revising posted speed limits in several municipalities across York Region, including: • King-Vaughan Road in the City of Vaughan: o One kilometre west of Keele Street to one kilometre east of Keele Street - 70 km/h to 60 km/h • Leslie Street in the Town of East Gwillimbury: o 230 metres north of Mount Albert Road/Farr Avenue to Doane Road - 80 km/h to 70 km/h o 320 metres south of Queensville Sideroad to 675 metres south of Queensville Sideroad - 40 km/h to 50 km/h as Queensville Public School was relocated • Queensville Sideroad in the Town of East Gwillimbury o 800 metres east of Yonge Street to 2nd Concession Road - 70 km/h to 60 km/h • King Road in the Township of King: o 135 metres west of 10th Concession to 200 metres east of 10th Concession - 80 km/h to 50 km/h o 190 metres east of 11th Concession to 135 metres west of 10th Concession - 80 km/h to 70 km/h • 17th Sideroad in the Township of King: o Jane Street to Dufferin Street - 60 km/h to 50 km/h • Woodbine Avenue in the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville: Page 236 of 241 4 o 200 metres north of Marjorie Drive to 800 metres north of Aurora Road - 80 km/h to 70 km/h o 180 metres south of Bloomington Road to 259 metres south of Vandorf Sideroad - 80 km/h to 70 km/h The York Region Vision Zero Traveller Safety Plan identifies aggressive driving that includes speeding represents 45% of severe collisions on Regional roads. Speed limit revisions are recommended and approved based on defined principles, including industry standards and criteria in the Region’s Establishing Speed Limits on Regional Roads Policy. The Highway Traffic Act gives Regional Council authority to revise speed limits under 100 km/hr. To notify travellers of speed limit changes, signs are placed at the beginning of each changed speed zone, and for the first 60 to 90 days includes a sign on top with the word "NEW." Learn more about traffic safety measures to protect the most vulnerable road users at york.ca/TrafficSafety York Region supports efforts to improve consistency in municipal road construction standards Regional Council received an update on The Regional Municipality of York's submission to the Province of Ontario proposal on the Proposed Harmonization of Municipal Road Construction Standards (26-MTO003). The Ministry of Transportation requested public input for consideration when developing a proposed regulation for municipalities. York Region supports the Province’s objective of improving consistency in municipal road construction standards while ensuring flexibility to accommodate local contexts and meet shared provincial and municipal infrastructure goals. The Region’s current approach uses Ontario Provincial Standards for Roads and Public Works as a baseline with targeted refinements to ensure infrastructure meets intended service life, performs reliably under local conditions and results in long-terms cost savings. Demonstrated benefits include extended pavement life (20 to 25 years), lower lifecycle costs and improved value for taxpayers. This approach ensures effective delivery of housing-enabling road infrastructure and supports continued municipal investment in congestion-relief projects. A collaborative and flexible regulatory framework supported by a formal provincial–municipal governance model with municipalities involved in the development and ongoing oversight of standards is recommended to support informed decision-making and successful implementation. York Region remains committed to ongoing collaboration with the Province, local municipal partners and road builders to strengthen consistency in standards. _____________________________ 2025 Health and Well-being Review highlights community strengths, pressures and need for additional senior government support Regional Council received the annual Health and Well-being Review, an analysis of local current trends and how York Region is responding to the evolving needs of residents. The review identifies strengths, challenges and opportunities within the community and supports shared understanding with the Region, municipal and community partners and other levels of government. The Page 237 of 241 5 annual review is intended to inform community engagement, system planning and advocacy to help residents thrive. York Region remains committed to supporting resident well-being through innovative programming, partnerships and effective service delivery. However, additional and sustainable investments from senior levels of government are needed for the Region to deliver programs and services to those who need them and ensure human services continue to support healthy communities. _______________ Community Investment Fund Served more than 40,000 residents in 2025 Regional Council received an update on the Community Investment Fund, an investment in initiatives delivered by community agencies targeting gaps in human services, complement or enhance Regional programs and deliver on Council priorities. With a $7.7 million total budget in 2025, the fund invested in 114 projects and initiatives delivered by 59 community agencies and served more than 40,000 residents. The projects support priority areas including housing stability, mental well-being, diversity, equity and inclusion, food security system development and other critical services and emergency needs. The Community Investment Fund is undergoing a comprehensive review to ensure it remains aligned with changing community needs and budget pressures. The review, expected to be shared with Regional Council for approval in 2027, will help determine how to prioritize limited resources, assess which investments deliver the greatest impact and identify opportunities to align with other Regional programs. _______________________________________________________________________ Supporting affordable child care through the Canada-Wide Early Learning and Child Care Program Regional Council received an update on The Canada-Wide Early Learning and Child Care (CWELCC) program, which provides benefits to children and families in York Region by improving child care affordability, expanding access to licensed child care and strengthening the child care and early years workforce. York Region has successfully allocated 5,197 new CWELCC-funded spaces between 2023 and 2026 and is expected to meet the province’s target of 39,000 spaces by the end of 2026. To ensure consistent access to affordable, high quality child care across the Region, 2,175 additional CWELCC- funded spaces are needed. Regional Council is requesting the provincial and federal government explore an income-tested approach that aligns with the existing child care fee subsidy program, with a focus of better supporting families with lower household incomes, rather than priority graphical areas, while maintaining affordability. Housing York Inc. marks 2025 as a year of action, partnership and progress At the April 16, 2026 meeting of Housing York Inc., Board of Director Members received Housing York Inc.’s (HYI) 2025 Annual Report, outlining a transformational year, advancing housing projects from planning to welcoming residents into new affordable housing units. The year marked the first phase of implementing From Vision to Vibrant Communities: Housing York Inc.’s 2025 to 2028 Strategic Plan, a four-year framework designed to guide HYI through rising housing Page 238 of 241 6 demand, aging infrastructure and service modernization. HYI focused on sustaining and increasing housing supply, supporting resilient communities and driving innovation and continuous improvement. A significant milestone in 2025 was the opening of Mosaic House in the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville. The 97 unit mixed-income development provides homes for 140 residents, including seniors, families and individuals. Mosaic House reached full occupancy within four months of opening, demonstrating strong demand for high-quality, affordable housing. Throughout 2025, work continued to create approximately 400 new housing units, including 150 units at Box Grove in the City of Markham and 250 units at 62 Bayview Parkway in the Town of Newmarket. Both projects are positioned to move toward construction. Once built, these facilities will be operated by HYI. Additional information about Housing York achievements in 2025 is available here. Additional information about Housing York is here. York Region continues funding commitment to Cortellucci Vaughan Hospital with $7.4 million contribution in 2026 Regional Council received an update on the 2026 Capital Contribution for the Mackenzie Health – Cortellucci Vaughan Hospital, outlining details of a funding commitment to support hospitals in York Region with capital projects until 2031, as part of a Memorandum of Understanding approved by Regional Council in 2009. Contributions to the Hospital Financing Reserve Fund are adjusted annually by the rate of change in the Region’s prior year’s assessment growth. Through the Regional Council-approved 2026 Operating Budget, the Region’s contribution for 2026 is approximately $7.4 million. Funding eligibility is related to Cortellucci Vaughan Hospital reducing transfer of care times for emergency patients. In 2025, Cortellucci Vaughan Hospital met its transfer of care target of 30 minutes, with an average transfer of care time of 21 minutes, across nearly 18,000 patient transports. To date, York Region has paid $116.8 million to Cortellucci Vaughan Hospital for the approved project. The remaining commitment to Cortellucci Vaughan Hospital is estimated to be $37.2 million. Regional Council maintains current Police Service Board composition Regional Council approved maintaining a seven-member composition for the York Regional Police Service Board and maintain the membership structure in place since 1995. The Board includes the Regional Chair or Council appointee, two addition Members of Council, one community member and three provincial appointees. Under the Community Safety and Policing Act, 2019, municipalities must pass a resolution to confirm the size of their police service boards. Maintaining the current seven-member structure ensures continuity in governance and reflects the absence of any need to change the Board’s size. Celebrating Public Works ‘Rooted in Service, Powered by Community’ York Region will mark May 17 to 23, 2026, as National Public Works Week, recognizing this year’s theme, “Rooted in Service, Powered by Community,” and the essential role public works plays in building and maintaining strong communities. From roads and bridges to water, wastewater and waste Page 239 of 241 7 management, these services form the backbone of daily life for residents and businesses across York Region. Throughout the week, York Region will celebrate the teams behind this work, with activities including a Paint-a-Plow contest for Grade 5 students, school tours of Regional facilities and forests and the annual Family Fun Day. Public Works will co-host a Family Fun Day in partnership with York Region Paramedic Services on Saturday, May 23, 2026, from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. Residents are invited to attend this free event at York Region Public Works Operation Centre and Paramedic Services Headquarters at 80 and 90 Bales Drive East in the Town of East Gwillimbury._______________________________________________ Celebrating Paramedic Services ‘Improving Outcomes, Together’ Paramedic Services Week, May 17 to 24, 2026 recognizes the dedication and critical role paramedics play across Canada for people in their communities. This year’s theme is “Improving Outcomes, Together. Paramedic Services Week recognizes the skill, compassion and dedication of York Region Paramedics and provides an opportunity to raise awareness about safety issues, including injury prevention and how to respond to medical emergencies. Responding to evolving community needs and a growing population, Paramedic Services continue to make key advancements in clinical care and service delivery, including: • Improving cardiac care with upgraded CPR and defibrillator protocols • Strengthening community readiness with tracked public automated external defibrillator locations and coordination with 911 dispatchers • Enhancing emergency response times by breaking ground on a new joint fire and paramedic response station in the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville • Reducing emergency department visits with the Accredited Advanced Care Paramedic Program, enhancing paramedic assessment, treatment and referral skills Paramedics are committed to exceptional patient care, and their community service continues to strengthen the health and safety of residents across the Region. York Region Paramedic Services will co-host a Family Fun Day in partnership with Public Works on Saturday, May 23, 2026, from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. Residents are invited to attend this free event at York Region Public Works Operation Centre and Paramedic Services Headquarters at 80 and 90 Bales Drive East in the Town of East Gwillimbury. Regional Council endorses call for National Chinese Heritage Month Regional Council endorsed a motion from City of Vaughan Regional Councillor Mario G. Racco, recognizing the significant contributions of Chinese Canadians to the social, economic and cultural fabric of York Region, Ontario and Canada. The motion also acknowledges the historical experiences of the Chinese community and the importance of continued efforts to foster inclusion and understanding. Building on York Region’s 2024 proclamation to recognize February as Chinese Heritage Month, Council also urges the Government of Canada to formally establish a Canadian Chinese Heritage Month. Page 240 of 241 8 GTAA requests re-nomination of Jennifer Tracy Li to Board of Directors Regional Council received communication from the Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA) and nominated Jennifer Tracy Li to its Board of Directors for a second three-year term, beginning May 13, 2026. Ms. Li has served on the Board since 2023 and is recognized for her strong contributions, strategic insight and leadership, including her work on the Audit and Human Resources and Compensation Committees. Her continued appointment supports stability and continuity as the GTAA advances its multi-year Pearson LIFT program to modernize and enhance Toronto Pearson International Airport. April Observances Regional Council recognized the following observances in April 2026: • World Autism Month • National Public Health Week – April 6 to 12, 2026 • National Volunteer Week – April 19 to 25, 2026 • Administrative Professionals Day – April 22, 2026 • Earth Day – April 22, 2026 • National Day of Mourning – April 28, 2026 Next meeting of York Regional Council The next Meeting of York Regional Council will be held on Thursday, May 21, 2026, at 9 a.m. in the York Region Administrative Centre Council Chambers, located at 17250 Yonge Street in the Town of Newmarket. The Council meeting will be streamed on york.ca/Live The Regional Municipality of York consists of nine local cities and towns and provides a variety of programs and services to more than 1.3 million residents and 58,000 businesses with more than 624,000 employees. More information about York Region’s key service areas is available at york.ca/RegionalServices -30- Media Contact: Kylie-Anne Doerner, Corporate Communications, The Regional Municipality of York Cell: 905-806-7138 Email: kylie-anne.doerner@york.ca Page 241 of 241