The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda - Heritage Advisory Committee - 20220112Town of Aurora Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Revised Agenda Date:January 12, 2022 Time:7:00 p.m. Location:Video Conference Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, meetings will be available to the public via live stream only on the Town’s YouTube Channel. To participate electronically please visit aurora.ca/participation. Pages 1.Call to Order *1.1.Appointment of Committee Chair and Vice Chair That a Committee member be elected as Chair for Year 2022 of the Heritage Advisory Committee (2018-2022 Term); and 1. That a Committee member be elected as Vice Chair for Year 2022 of the Heritage Advisory Committee (2018-2022 Term). 2. 2.Approval of the Agenda 3.Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof 4.Receipt of the Minutes 4.1.Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of November 1, 2021 1 That the Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of November 1, 2021 be received for information. 5.Delegations *5.1.Steve Armes, Resident; Re: Item 6.2 - Memorandum from Planner/Heritage Planning; Re: Heritage Permit Application, Faraji, 74 Centre St 8 6.Matters for Consideration 6.1.Memorandum from Director, Community Services; Re: Pet Cemetery – Project Update 16 That the memorandum regarding Pet Cemetery – Project Update be received; and 1. That the Heritage Advisory Committee comments regarding Pet Cemetery – Project Update be received and referred to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate. 2. 6.2.Memorandum from Planner/Heritage Planning; Re: Heritage Permit Application, Faraji, 74 Centre Street, File Number: HPA-2020-04 18 (Presentation to be provided by David Eqbal, Architect, and Hassan Faraji, Owner) That the memorandum regarding Heritage Permit Application HPA-2020-04 be received; and 1. That the Heritage Advisory Committee comments regarding Heritage Permit Application HPA-2020-04 be received and referred to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate. 2. 7.Informational Items 8.Adjournment 1 Town of Aurora Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes Date: Time: Location: Monday, November 1, 2021 7:00 p.m. Video Conference Committee Members: Jeff Lanthier (Chair) John Green Matthew Kinsella Robert Lounds Bob McRoberts Councillor Sandra Humfryes Members Absent: Hoda Soliman (Vice Chair) Other Attendees: Mayor Tom Mrakas (ex-officio) Sara Tienkamp, Manager, Parks and Fleet Lisa Hausz, Manager, Economic Development and Policy Brashanthe Manoharan, Planner/Heritage Planning Ishita Soneji, Council/Committee Coordinator _____________________________________________________________________ 1. Procedural Notes This meeting was held electronically as per Section 19. i) of the Town's Procedure By-law No. 6228-19, as amended, due to the COVID-19 situation. The Mayor and the Committee welcomed new member Robert Lounds. The Chair called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. 2. Approval of the Agenda The Committee inquired about the possibility of including updates on various heritage related topics of interest on the agenda. It was mentioned that as per Page 1 of 36 2 the current process, the Committee members can request for items or updates two to three weeks prior to the scheduled meeting and updates would be provided accordingly. Moved by Matthew Kinsella Seconded by John Green That the revised agenda as circulated by Legislative Services, be approved. Carried 3. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof There were no declarations of pecuniary interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M.50. 4. Receipt of the Minutes 4.1 Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of September 13, 2021 The Committee referred to Item 6.1 - Heritage Permit Application for 74 Centre Street and inquired about the next steps regarding any revisions to the proposed designs. Staff noted that a revised proposal has been submitted to the Town and will be brought for Council consideration to the November 16, 2021 General Committee meeting. Moved by Matthew Kinsella Seconded by Bob McRoberts That the Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of September 13, 2021, be received for information. Carried 5. Delegations 5.1 Gord and Erin Heyting, Residents; Re: Item 6.5 - Memorandum from Planner/Heritage Planning; Re: Tree Removal Permit Application - 144 Temperance Street Gord Heyting spoke in support of the Tree Removal Permit Application and responded to questions regarding the condition of the existing trees and the replanting plan. Page 2 of 36 3 Moved by Bob McRoberts Seconded by Matthew Kinsella That the comments of the delegation be received and referred to Item 6.5. Carried 6. Matters for Consideration The Committee consented to consider the items in the following order: 6.5, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, and 6.4. 6.1 Memorandum from Manager, Economic Development and Policy; Re: Streetscape Needs Assessment – Heritage Consultation Staff provided a brief overview of the memorandum and sought the Committee's input regarding the streetscape improvements. Donna Hinde and Andrew Hooke from The Planning Partnership were also present to respond to questions. The Committee sought clarification on the size of the subject area and possibility of including surrounding streets, and staff noted that the focus area was determined as per the Aurora Promenade Streetscape Plan. The Committee noted the importance of maintaining the heritage aspects of the buildings in the proposed subject area through preservation of the heritage features and commemorative signage. The Committee further provided suggestions regarding parking signage, adding more trees to the streetscape, and pedestrian safety measures. Moved by Bob McRoberts Seconded by John Green 1. That the memorandum regarding Streetscape Needs Assessment - Heritage Consultant be received; and 2. That the Heritage Advisory Committee comments regarding Streetscape Needs Assessment be received and referred to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate Carried Page 3 of 36 4 6.2 Memorandum from Heritage Planner; Re: Review of Aurora Register – Evaluation Methodology Dan Currie from MHBC Planning presented an overview of the Review of the Aurora Register project highlighting the evaluation methodology including legislated requirements for the evaluations, policy framework and classification criteria, examples of the reviews conducted, and the next steps. Vanessa Hicks and Robyn McIntyre, MHBC Planning were also present to respond to questions. The Committee, Staff, and the Consultants discussed about the timeline of the project and the future role of the Evaluation Sub-committee. The Committee suggested that appropriate training for current sub-committee members would be beneficial before the new evaluation methodology is adopted by Council. The Committee sought clarification regarding the interpretation of the “at risk” value criteria in the evaluation form, and the Consultants noted that at risk criteria is general in nature to determine high priority properties. Moved by Bob McRoberts Seconded by Matthew Kinsella 1. That the memorandum regarding Review of Aurora Register – Evaluation Methodology be received; and, 2. That the Heritage Advisory Committee comments regarding Review of Aurora Register – Evaluation Methodology be received and referred to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate. Carried 6.3 Memorandum from Planner/Heritage Planning; Re: Heritage Permit Application, File: HPA-2021-14, 15356 Yonge Street (Knowles-Readman House) Bruce Hall, Planning Consultant and Wayne Morgan, Heritage Planner, The Planning Partnership, presented an overview of the heritage permit application for the subject property. They provided details on the proposed removal of the two-storey tail wing and design changes from the previous Page 4 of 36 5 submission. They further addressed key aspects such as heritage preservation, building height, gross floor area, and area fit. Staff provided a brief overview of the memorandum and application. The Committee expressed support on the removal of the two-storey tail wing as proposed and had no further comments. Moved by Matthew Kinsella Seconded by Robert Lounds 1. That the memorandum regarding Heritage Permit Application File: HPA-2021-14 be received; and 2. That the Heritage Advisory Committee comments regarding Heritage Permit Application File: HPA-2021-14 be received and referred to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate. Carried 6.4 Memorandum from Planner/Heritage Planning; Re: Amendment to Heritage Designation By-law 6182-19, De La Salle College and Pine Ridge Trail (Monk’s Walk), 50-100 Bloomington Road West Staff provided a brief overview of the memorandum outlining the purpose of the amendment to the Heritage Designation By-law 6182-19 and the next steps. The Committee referred to the proposed addition to the Historical/Association Value section and sought clarification on the occupancy of the building and staff provided a response. The Committee expressed support and had no further comments. Moved by John Green Seconded by Bob McRoberts 1. That the memorandum regarding a proposed Amendment to Heritage Designation By-law 6182-19 be received; and 2. That the Heritage Advisory Committee comments regarding a proposed Amendment to Heritage Designation By-law 6182-19 be received and referred to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate. Carried Page 5 of 36 6 6.5 Memorandum from Planner/Heritage Planning; Re: Tree Removal Permit Application – 144 Temperance Street Staff provided a brief overview of the memorandum and application. The Committee commented on the maturity of the Spruce trees and noted that the removal would not affect the streetscape. The Committee sought clarification on the tree compensation value and how the value was derived, and staff provided clarification. The Committee was in support of the application and further discussed about the proposed landscape and replanting plan. Moved by Bob McRoberts Seconded by Matthew Kinsella 1. That the memorandum regarding Tree Removal Permit Application – 144 Temperance Street be received; and 2. That the Heritage Advisory Committee comments regarding the Tree Removal Application – 144 Temperance Street be received and referred to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate. Carried 7. Informational Items 7.1 Memorandum from Planner/Heritage Planning; Re: Alterations to a Listed Heritage Property – 53 Metcalfe Street Staff provided an overview of the memorandum. The Committee had no further comments. Moved by Matthew Kinsella Seconded by Bob McRoberts 1. That the memorandum regarding alterations to a listed heritage property at 53 Metcalfe Street be received for information. Carried 8. Adjournment Moved by Matthew Kinsella Seconded by Robert Lounds Page 6 of 36 7 That the meeting be adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Carried Page 7 of 36 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Delegation Request This request and any written submissions or background information for consideration by either Council or Committees of Council is being submitted to Legislative Services. Council or Committee * Heritage Advisory Committee Council or Committee Meeting Date *  2022-1-12 Subject * HPA-2020-04 Full Name of Spokesperson and Name of Group or Person(s) being Represented (if applicable) * Steve Armes Brief Summary of Issue or Purpose of Delegation * Concerns regarding the current revisions and proposal Have you been in contact with a Town staff or Council member regarding your matter of interest? * Yes No Full name of the Town staff or Council member with whom you spoke Brashanthe Date you spoke with Town staff or a Council member 2021-12-14   Page 8 of 36 The Saga of 74 Centre StreetPage 9 of 36 https://www.aurora.ca/en/business-and-development/resources/Environment-and-Sustainability/Tree-Protection-Preservation-Policy-June-2015.pdfPage 10 of 36 Page 11 of 36 https://www.aurora.ca/en/business-and-development/resources/Environment-and-Sustainability/Tree-Protection-Preservation-Policy-June-2015.pdfPage 12 of 36 Page 13 of 36 Page 14 of 36 Page 15 of 36 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Town of Aurora Memorandum Community Services Re: Pet Cemetery – Project Update To: Heritage Advisory Committee From: Robin McDougall, Director of Community Services Date: January 12, 2022 Recommendation 1. That the memorandum regarding Pet Cemetery – Project Update be received; and 2. That the Heritage Advisory Committee comments regarding Pet Cemetery – Project Update be received and referred to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate. Background The Pet Cemetery, also known as “Happy Woodland Pet Cemetery,” is located off Yonge Street in a wooded area. The property was formerly used by dog breeders in the late 1920’s, they buried their first pet on the property in 1933. The owners erected a stone memorial that read, “Our Dear Pets: they lived happy and died beloved”. This commenced the establishment of the pet cemetery. It is believed that the last pet burial was in 1978. The Town of Aurora has owned the pet cemetery lands since approximately 2011. In 2017, the Town allocated annual funds towards restoration of the site. Starting in 2018, staff and memorial restoration contractors have attended the site with a focus on unearthing sunken stones, restoring plots, removing spurge, and fallen trees and cataloguing the stones including their details and location within the cemetery. The cemetery land is approximately 2,400 square meters (0.24 ha or 0.60 ac). The site is divided into 24 grids with each grid approximately 10 m x 10 m. As of the latest restoration visit in October 2021, the count is over 800 stones. Page 16 of 36 Pet Cemetery – Project Update January 12, 2022 Page 2 of 2 Three sides of the pet cemetery are bordered by a private property and the fourth side is adjacent to other Town owned lands (forested area). Due to the dense forested area and difficulty getting equipment into the cemetery site, the Town entered into a temporary ‘Permission to Enter’ agreement with the private property owner for access to the pet cemetery. The plan is to create a trail through the Town lands which will connect to the pet cemetery. As we look to the future of the pet cemetery, staff are seeking feedback from the Heritage Advisory Committee on the projects next steps. Staff will share a presentation during the meeting which will cover these items:  Site Restoration  Fencing (Temporary/Permanent and Preferred Style)  Historic Site Recognition (Local Registry/Designation, OHT Easement, National Historic Site Designation)  Future Programming (publicly accessible) Attachments None Page 17 of 36 100 John West Way Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1 (905) 727-3123 aurora.ca Town of Aurora Memorandum Planning and Development Services Re: Heritage Permit Application Faraji 74 Centre Street File Number: HPA-2020-04 To: Heritage Advisory Committee From: Brashanthe Manoharan, Planner/Heritage Planning Date: January 12, 2022 Recommendation 1. That the memorandum regarding Heritage Permit Application HPA-2020-04 be received; and 2. That the Heritage Advisory Committee comments regarding Heritage Permit Application HPA-2020-04 be received and referred to staff for consideration and further action as appropriate. Summary This memo provides the Heritage Advisory Committee with the necessary information to comment on Heritage Permit Application HPA-2020-04 for 74 Centre Street. The revised heritage permit application for the development of a two-storey triplex dwelling at 74 Centre Street is located in the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District Plan.  Staff continue to support the two-storey triplex dwelling as it represents a Homestead architectural style and maintains the historical streetscape of Centre Street.  Staff are satisfied that the proposed detached garage in the rear yard will provide sufficient parking and will not have any adverse impacts on the streetscape or rear yard amenity space. Page 18 of 36 Heritage Permit HPA-2020-04 – 74 Centre Street January 12, 2022 Page 2 of 7  Staff are of the opinion that the revised design is in keeping with the guidelines of the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District Plan. Background Property Description The subject property is located within the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District on the north side of Centre Street between Spruce Street and Walton Drive. There is an existing 1½ storey Arts and Crafts bungalow on the property that was constructed around 1873. The building has been subject to a number of renovations over the years including a front addition and siding. The original elements of the style may have been either removed or covered as a result of the alterations. There is a mature tree located at the front of the existing dwelling that is considered significant as part of the historical streetscape. Heritage Designation In 2006, Town Council passed By-Law 4809-06.D to designate 74 Centre Street under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act as part of the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District. Council also passed By-Law 4809-06.D to adopt the “Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District Plan” as the document to guide the preservation, redevelopment of properties and streetscapes located within the boundaries of the District. Application History On November 26, 2020, the owner submitted a Heritage Permit Application (HPA-2020- 04) to permit the construction of two-storey double duplex building with four parking spaces at the rear. The proposal was presented to the Heritage Advisory Committee on April 5, 2021, whereby concerns regarding lot depth, number of windows on the front elevation, and lack of landscape in the rear yard were expressed. Staff worked with the owner to address the concerns, and revised plans were provided to General Committee on July 6, 2021 for consideration. At the July 6, 2021 General Committee meeting, neighbouring property owners expressed their concerns regarding the scale and density of the development and its Page 19 of 36 Heritage Permit HPA-2020-04 – 74 Centre Street January 12, 2022 Page 3 of 7 inconsistencies with the historical character of the area, impacts of proposed rear parking, and noted their willingness to work with the owner to address their concerns. The application was deferred to a future General Committee meeting. The owner consented to an extension of the application and engaged in consultations with the neighbouring property owners to address their concerns and submitted a revised proposal for Staff’s consideration. On August 6, 2021, the owner submitted a revised proposal to permit the construction of a two-storey triplex dwelling with four (4) parking spaces at the front [three (3) spaces west of the dwelling and one (1) parking space (existing) east of the dwelling], and a cedar tree hedge along the rear property line. This proposal was presented at the September 13, 2021 Heritage Advisory Committee meeting, whereby comments regarding parking across the front of the house, unit parking distribution and control, front porch depth and proximity/view to parking, potential basement units, and traffic were expressed. The Committee further recommended that the applicant engage an experienced heritage architect to assist with designing a more compatible with the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District. On October 4, 2021, the application was reviewed by the Town’s Design Review Panel (DRP) where comments relating to site design, parking, amenity space, landscaping, design of verandah, and entrances were discussed. The comments were provided to the owner, who considered them in the revised proposal. Following consultation with area residents, HAC members, and DRP, the owner submitted a revised proposal on October 19, 2021 to permit the construction of a two- storey triplex dwelling with a total of four (4) parking spaces [three (3) spaces in the rear yard which will be accessed by a driveway located along the west side yard, and one (1) parking space (existing) in the front yard, east of the dwelling], and a cedar tree hedge along the rear property line. The revised proposal was considered by the General Committee on November 16, 2021, whereby comments relating to rear yard parking, design, and density were discussed. The application was deferred and referred back to staff. The owner consented to additional 60-day extension of the application and resubmitted a revised proposal for Staff’s consideration on December 8, 2021. Page 20 of 36 Heritage Permit HPA-2020-04 – 74 Centre Street January 12, 2022 Page 4 of 7 Revised Application Following comments received from the November 16, 2021 General Committee meeting, the applicant submitted a revised proposal on December 8, 2021 to permit the construction of a two-storey triplex dwelling with parking provided in a detached garage located in the rear yard which will be accessed by a driveway located along the west side yard. The proposal includes a landscape buffer with pyramidal cedars along the rear property line to help minimize the visual impact on the abutting property to the north. Extensive planting is proposed along the west property line and near the front of the east property line, while the existing vegetation along the east property line will be preserved to further mitigate any potential impacts of the proposal to the abutting property to the east. The large mature tree in the front yard is to remain. No other vegetation on the property is proposed to be removed (Attachment 1 – Proposed Drawings). The proposed building continues the Homestead architectural style of a square shaped building designed with a gable roof. The proposal further maintains a single detached building form, which is the predominant style in the Northeast Old Aurora neighbourhood. The front façade features a covered verandah that stretches across the entire front elevation and is supported by five (5) columns. The siding will consist of light grey horizontal vinyl. All the windows will be an arts and crafts style. The proposed building has a total of four glazed entrances, two at the front, and one on each side elevation. The proposed building also features a first and second storey balcony at the rear of the building for private amenity space. Analysis The Homestead architectural design style is common on Centre Street and is considered compatible with the character of the neighbourhood In accordance with the District Plan, 74 Centre Street is described as a “renovated Cape Cod Cottage, perhaps a DVA House”, characterized by its horizontal siding, gable roof, and plain trims around the windows. The proposed triplex dwelling replicates some of the original attributes while maintaining a homestead architectural style, which is characterized by a gable roof, simple details, sash windows, and clapboard finishes. This architectural style is common on Centre Street and is considered compatible with the character of the neighbourhood. Page 21 of 36 Heritage Permit HPA-2020-04 – 74 Centre Street January 12, 2022 Page 5 of 7 Section 9.1.2 of the District Plan states that the maintenance of the distinctive form, scale, massing, and spacing found on the traditional streetscape is an important attribute of the Conservation District. The proposed two-storey triplex maintains a single detached building form and the historic lotting pattern which is the predominant style in the Northeast Old Aurora neighbourhood. Staff continue to be of the opinion that the revised design is in keeping with the guidelines of the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District Plan As per Section 4.5.1 of the District Plan, new residential buildings should complement the immediate physical context and streetscape by being generally the same scale, orientation, having similar setbacks, and being of like materials and colours. A triplex dwelling, which is permitted as of right use in the R7 zone provided it meets applicable zoning standards including a maximum lot coverage of 35%. The proposal has been revised to have a narrower footprint than the previous submission with a lot coverage of 217.41 square metres (30.4%), which is well under the maximum 35% lot coverage requirement of the Zoning By-Law but will require relief from the lot frontage and lot area standards of the R7 zone. Staff are of the opinion that the proposed triplex dwelling is compatible with the scale and massing of the neighbourhood. Section 9.1.2.4 of the District Plan states that new construction should respect the overall setback pattern of the streetscape on which it is situated in. The proposed triplex has a setback of 7.50 m (24.60 ft), excluding the verandah which has a setback of 5.39 m (17.68m). The main dwelling is setback further than the adjacent dwellings, to facilitate the front verandah that brings the proposed dwelling forward and allows sufficient space for landscaping treatment in the front yard. This will decrease any potential visual dominance issues and are not anticipated to create adverse affects to the streetscape. Further, Section 4.2c) of the District Plan states that new dwellings should be limited to a maximum depth of 16.8 m (55.11 ft), excluding an open porch projection to preserve backyard amenity space and to be consistent with the existing homes in the neighborhood. The proposed triplex has a total building depth of 16.65 m (54.62ft). Staff are satisfied that the revised proposal reflects a built form that is in keeping with the design objectives of the Heritage District Plan. Page 22 of 36 Heritage Permit HPA-2020-04 – 74 Centre Street January 12, 2022 Page 6 of 7 Staff are satisfied that the proposed detached garage located in the rear yard is in keeping with the guidelines of the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District Plan The previous design proposed four (4) parking spaces: three (3) spaces in the rear which was to be accessed by a driveway located along the west side yard, and one (1) parking space (existing) east of the dwelling. At the November 16, 2021 General Committee meeting, Council was of the opinion that this design compromises the rear yard amenity space and proposes a greater area of impervious surface in the rear yard. As such, the applicant has revised the proposal to provide parking in a detached garage located in the rear yard. Section 4.2a) and Section 9.1.2 of the District Plan states that new garages for new or existing houses shall be separate rear or flankage yard outbuildings and that side yard driveways shall be preserved as side yard driveways and rear yard garages are key elements of the District’s character. The elimination of rear yard parking from the previous submission allows for ample rear year amenity space, which is further complemented by the two-storey balcony on the rear elevation, which provides a private outdoor amenity area for the units as well. Staff are satisfied that the detached garage located in the rear yard is consistent with the aforementioned guidelines in the District Plan and maintains the historic lotting pattern while preserving the backyard amenity space. Further, Section 4.2b) and Section 9.1.2.6 of the District Plan states that new garages for new or existing houses will have gable or hipped roofs, with a maximum height of 4.6 m (15.09 ft). The proposed height of the detached dwelling is approximately 2. 7m (8.86 ft). The proposal includes a landscape buffer with pyramidal cedars along the rear property line to help lessen the visual impact on the adjacent property to the north. Extensive planting is proposed along the west and near the front of the east property line, while the existing vegetation along the east property line will further mitigate any potential impacts of the proposal on the abutting property to the east. No other vegetation on the property is proposed to be removed. The proposal is subject to site plan control. Comments relating, but not limited to, the physical layout of the development, parking, proposed landscaping and tree preservation will be addressed in further detail through the site plan and the site plan Page 23 of 36 Heritage Permit HPA-2020-04 – 74 Centre Street January 12, 2022 Page 7 of 7 agreement. As such, staff are satisfied that the proposed detached garage in the rear yard provides sufficient parking space, will not adversely impact the rear-yard amenity space, and maintains the key elements of scale and massing which are predominant features of the Northeast Old Aurora neighbourhood. Potential Additional Units in Basement The basement walk-up from the previous submission has been removed to eliminate concerns regarding future conversion of basement for rental use. Secondary units are not permitted in triplex buildings as per the Town’s Zoning By-law. In the event that one is proposed, it will require Town Planning Approval (i.e., Minor Variance or Zoning By- law Amendment). Prior to the issuance of the building permit, the applicant is required to sign an undertaking stating that the basement will not be converted into an apartment. As a precautionary measure, staff will include a clause in the Site Plan Agreement that will be registered on title to advise future owners that a secondary dwelling unit is not permitted. Public Consultation Staff have been informed that discussions took place with the property owner to the east, whereby no objection to three (3) units were expressed, but that one of the units must be in the basement. The applicant has stated that it is unreasonable for adjacent property owners to comment on how the interior of the building should be designed. The process for public consultation on a heritage permit is not a requirement of either the Ontario Heritage Act or the Planning Act. Furthermore, the feedback received from area residents regarding land use or the interior design of the dwelling are not relevant to the decision to approve or refuse a heritage permit application. Conclusions Staff are satisfied that the revised proposal reflects a built form that is in keeping with the design objectives of the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation Heritage District Plan. Staff recommend to Council that Heritage Permit Application HPA-2020- 04 for 74 Centre Street be approved. Attachments Attachment 1 – Proposed Drawings Attachment 2 – Streetscape Rendering Page 24 of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o. Description Date ByPage 25 of 36 352-(&712'5$:1%<&+(&.('%<&/,(17 61$0( $''5(666+((72)6+((77,7/(6&$/('$7($%&352-(&767$786352-(&7$''5(66352-(&71$0(&RS\ULJKW3UR9LVLRQ$UFKLWHFWXUH,QF2$$'XSOLFDWLRQRUUHSURGXFWLRQE\DQ\PHDQVZLWKRXWWKHH[SUHVVZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI3UR9LVLRQ$UFKLWHFWXUH,QF2$$LVDYLRODWLRQRI)HGHUDODQGLQWHUQDWLRQDOODZ7KHLQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDLQHGRQWKLVGRFXPHQWDUHWKHLQWHOOHFWXDOSURSHUW\RI3UR9LVLRQ$UFKLWHFWXUH,QF2$$DQGDOOULJKWVWKHUHWRDUH5HVHUYHG&23<5,*+73529,6,21$5&+,7(&785(,1&7)(PDLOSYD#SURYLVLRQDUFKFRP<RQJH6W8QLW%$XURUD21/*0DEVLELOPMENT AT3529,6,21$5&+,7(&785(,1&30A0.1RENDERINGS74 CENTRE ST.$XWKRU&KHFNHU6(374 CENTRE ST., AURORA, ON L4G 1J8CONCEPT DRAWINGSNo. Description Date ByPage 26 of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o. Description Date ByPage 27 of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o. Description Date ByPage 28 of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o. Description Date By 6287+ '(7$&+('*$5$*( 1257+ '(7$&+('*$5$*( ($67(/(9$7,21 '(7$&+('*$5$*( :(67(/(9$7,21 '(7$&+('*$5$*(Page 29 of 36 Page 30 of 36 74 Centre StreetHACPage 31 of 36 CONSIDERATIONSMax 35%Proposed:30.43%GFA substantially less than typical new single family dwelling.7.64 m Building HeightMax. Allowed = 10mPage 32 of 36 CONFORMITYPage 33 of 36 FLOOR PLANSPage 34 of 36 ELEVATIONPage 35 of 36 PROPOSALPage 36 of 36