Agenda - General Committee - 20050607GENERAL CO
AGENDA
N0.05-16
TOESDAY, TUNE 7, 2005
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CNAMBERS
AURORA TOWN HALL
11TEE
PUBLIC RELEASE
03/06/04
TOWN OF AURORA
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING
AGENDA
NO. 05-16
Tuesday, June 7, 2005
Councillor Wallace in the Chair
I DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
H APPROVAL OF AGENDA
RECOMMENDED:
THAT the content of the Agenda as circulated by the Corporate Services
Department be approved as presented.
111 DETERMINATION OF ITEMS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION
IV ADOPTION OF ITEMS NOT REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION
V DELEGATIONS
(a) Mr. Daniel Kostopoulos and Mr. Dino Basso (pg. D-1)
Re: Regional Noise Policy Presentation
(b) Mr. Jerry Mintz, Principal Engineer (pg. D-2)
Calearth International Development
Re: Continuance of Zoning By-law Amendment Application
15018 Yonge Street, Aurora, File D14-11-03
(c) Mr. Aasit Amin (pg. D-5)
Re: Continuance of Zoning By-law Amendment Application
15018 Yonge Street, Aurora, File D14-11-03
Page 2 of 10
General Committee Meeting No. 05-16
Tuesday, June 7, 2005
(d) Mr. Bert Dekkema (pg. D-6)
Re: Request for Change of Address for Thompson
Funeral Home
(e) Mr. Miloslav Prikryl, Resident
Re: Youth and Youth Centre
(pg• D-7)
VI CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION
VI/ OTHER BUSINESS, COUNCILLORS
VIII IN -CAMERA
None
IX ADJOURNMENT
General Committee Meeting No. 05-16 Page 3 of 10
Tuesday, June 7, 2005
AGENDA ITEMS
1. PL05-047 — Proposed Northeast Old Aurora Heritage (pg. 1)
Conservation District
RECOMMENDED:
THAT the letter from the Olde Aurora Ratepayers Association requesting
the Town proceed with the initiation of a Heritage Conservation District
Study for Northeast Old Aurora be received; and
THAT staff be directed to report back to General Committee at the
meeting of June 21, 2005 respecting the following:
• Proposed Heritage Conservation District Study Area boundary;
• Terms of Reference for the Heritage Conservation District Study;
• Request for proposals to undertake the study;
• Selection of a committee to review proposals and recommend to
Council;
• Appointment of a Heritage Conservation District Study Advisory Sub -
Committee;
• Heritage Conservation District Study Area By-law; and
THAT a Heritage Conservation District Study Sub -Committee be formed.
2. PL05-048 — The Ontario Heritage Act — Recent Amendments (pg. 19)
RECOMMENDED:
THAT the staff report entitled "The Ontario Heritage Act — Recent
Amendments", dated June 7, 2005 be received.
3. PL05-049 — Designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act (pg. 36)
Hartman's Corners School, S.S. #1 Whitchurch Township
118 Wellington Street East
Roya Alami
RECOMMENDED:
THAT The Hartman's Corners School, S.S. #1 Whitchurch Township at
118 Wellington Street East be approved for designation under Part IV of
the Ontario Heritage Act, as recommended by the Heritage Advisory
Committee of Aurora: and
General Committee Meeting No. 05-16 Page 4 of 10
Tuesday, June 7, 2005
THAT the Corporate Services Department be authorized to:
• Publish and serve Council's Notice of Intention to Designate as per the
requirements of the Act; and
• Prepare the Designation By-law for the Property; and
THAT, as recommended by the Heritage Advisory Committee of Aurora,
the application for demolition of the Hartman's Corners School, S.S. #1
Whitchurch Township be denied; and
THAT the owner be requested to work with the Town (Community
Planner) to determine solutions for the rehabilitation of the Hartman's
Corners School, S.S. #1, Whitchurch Township.
4. PL05-051 — Prehearing Conference of the Ontario Municipal Board (pg. 70)
Respecting Appeals to OPA # 17 and ROPA # 3
Regarding the Delineation of the Town's Urban Settlement Area
OMB Case No. PL980166, OMB File No. 0980052
RECOMMENDED:
THAT staff be authorized to retain the law firm of Weir and Foulds to
appear at an Ontario Municipal Board Prehearing Conference on June 22,
2005 respecting appeals by Shell Products Canada Limited, Whitwell
Development Limited, and Quakers Lundy Farm from a decision of the
Regional Municipality of York to approve an expansion of the Aurora
urban settlement boundary to permit the urban settlement area to include
various lands.
5. ADM05-010 — Appointments to Ontario Power Authority (OPA) (pg. 87)
Working Group
RECOMMENDED:
THAT Council appoint_
Power Authority Working
Government Official; and
to the Ontario
Group as the Town of Aurora Municipal
THAT Council, acting in its capacity as the sole shareholder of Borealis
Hydro Electric Holdings Inc., appoint to the
Ontario Power Authority Working Group as the Aurora Hydro Technical
Advisor.
General Committee Meeting No. 05-16
Tuesday, June 7, 2005
Page 5 of 10
6. TR05-023 — New Recreation Complex - Approval to Issue (pg. 116)
Debentures and Financing Option
RECOMMENDED:
THAT the anticipated proceeds from the sale of Aurora Hydro not be
considered as a means of financing the New Recreation Complex at this
time, due to the delay closing the sale and the need to develop a
comprehensive policy on the control and distribution of the proceeds from
the sale of Aurora Hydro; and
THAT Council authorize the issuance of debentures to complete the
approved funding of the New Recreation Complex being financed from
current and post 2013 Development Charges; and
THAT the Regional Municipality of York be requested to approve the
issuance of debentures to partially finance the New Recreation Complex
in the amount of $12,669,300 on behalf of the Corporation of the Town of
Aurora, repayable from Development Charges collected over a period of
ten (10) years;
THAT the Regional Municipality of York be requested to approve the
issuance of debentures to finance the New Recreation Complex in the
amount of $4,245,700 on behalf of the Corporation of the Town of
Aurora, repayable from post 2013 Development Charges over a period of
twenty (20) years; and
THAT Council provide direction to staff as to whether they wish the Region
of York to proceed with the sale of the debentures at this time or have staff
proceed in accordance with Section 405 of the Municipal Act, 2001 S.O.
2001, c. 25 as amended and arrange with our bankers for temporary
borrowing of an amount not to exceed $16,915,000 for a period 12 months
at a rate not to exceed prime + 1.0% (5.50%); and
THAT the debenture financing of the Non -development Charge
component of the New Recreation Complex totalling $2,135,000 be
deferred until the completion of the Reserve and Reserve Fund Review
and Long Term Capital Funding Review; and
THAT By-law 4667-05.F be enacted at the June 14, 2005 Council
meeting.
General Committee Meeting No. 05-16
Tuesday, June 7, 2005
7.
11
CS05-018— Animal Control Services Update
RECOMMENDED:
Page 6 of 10
(pg. 127)
THAT the Animal Control Services Update Report be received for
information; and
THAT Council authorize that staff enter into a month to month agreement
with the current service provider, Kennel Inn, pending the finalization of
the RFP and associated review process.
CS05-019 — Council Pending List - Status Report (pg. 130)
RECOMMENDED:
THAT CS05-019 be received for information purposes.
9. PW05-014 — Approval to Execute an Engineering Agreement — (pg. 149)
Design of Sidewalk, Bikeway and Illumination on
Bloomington Sideroad from Bathurst Street to
Bayview Avenue
RECOMMENDED:
THAT Council authorize the Director of Public Works to execute an
Engineering Agreement between the Town of Aurora and R. V. Anderson
Associates Ltd. for the design of sidewalks, bikeway and illumination along
Bloomington Sideroad from Bathurst Street to Bayview Avenue at the
quoted cost of $59,800, exclusive of GST; and
THAT funds for this work be approved to be expended from the
Development Charges Reserve.
10. PW05-017 — Review of Water and Wastewater Service Delivery (pg. 170)
System, Region of York Transportation and Works
Committee Recommendations
RECOMMENDED:
THAT Council receive for information Report No. PW05-017 regarding the
review of the water and wastewater delivery system, as recommended by
the Region of York Transportation and Works Committee; and
THAT staff be requested to report further on the details of a Service Level
Agreement between the Town and the Region.
General Committee Meeting No. 05-16
Tuesday, June 7, 2005
11
12.
13.
14.
PW05-018 — Inspection of the Town of Aurora Drinking Water
System by the Ministry of Environment
RECOMMENDED:
Page 7 of 10
(pg. 189)
THAT Report No. PW05-018 regarding an inspection of the Town of
Aurora's drinking water system performed on March 3, 2005 by the
Ministry of Environment Inspector be received for information.
PW05-020 — Operation and Maintenance of the Town's (pg. 240)
Traffic Signals
RECOMMENDED:
THAT Council receive for information Report PW05-020 entitled
"Operation and Maintenance of the Town's Traffic Signals;
THAT Council authorize the Mayor and Clerk to sign the attached
agreement between the Town of Aurora and York Region for the operation
and maintenance of the Town's traffic signals on Yonge Street in the Town
of Aurora; and
THAT a copy of Report PW05-020 be forwarded to the Clerk of the Region
of York.
ADM05-011 — Memorandum of Understanding — One York (pg. 256)
RECOMMENDED:
THAT Council authorize the Chief Administrative Officer to execute the
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding One York substantially
in the form attached hereto; and
THAT the Chief Administrative Officer report back to Council once the
preliminary investigations regarding gaps in need have been identified.
PW05-015 — Award of Tender No. PW-2005-01 - Pavement (pg. 267)
Markings of Various Streets and Parking Lots
RECOMMENDED:
THAT Tender No. PW-2005-01 — "Pavement Markings of Various Streets
and Parking Lots", be awarded to K.D.N. Pavement Markings Ltd. at the
tendered price of $21,780.00 per year for a three year period exclusive of
GST; and
General Committee Meeting No. 05-16
Tuesday, June 7, 2005
Page 8 of 10
THAT Council authorize the Mayor and Municipal Clerk to execute the
attached Form of Agreement between the Town of Aurora and K.D.N.
Pavement Markings for the pavement markings of various streets and
parking lots.
15. PW05-016 — Award of Tender No. P.W.2005-28 — Supply and (pg. 272)
Delivery of Two Full Size 314 Ton Cargo Vans Complete
With Power Inverters
RECOMMENDED:
THAT Tender No. P.W.2005-28 - "Supply and Delivery of Two Full Size
3/4 Ton Cargo Vans Complete With Power Inverters", be awarded to
Unionville Motors Ltd. at its tendered price of $77,304.24, exclusive of
GST; and
THAT Council authorize the Mayor and Municipal Clerk to execute the
attached Form of Agreement between the Town of Aurora and Unionville
Motors Ltd. for the Supply and Delivery of Two Full Size 3/4 Ton Cargo
Vans Complete With Power Inverters.
16. LS05-032 — Deferral of Playing Surface Floor Replacement and (pg. 278)
Additional Funding for Dasher Board Replacement
RECOMMENDED:
THAT Council be advised of the deferral of the ACC #1 playing surface
floor replacement until 2006; and
THAT additional funding for arena dasher board and glass replacement at
ACC #1 be considered in the 2006 Capital Budget.
17. LS05-033 — Recommendation to Purchase a New Olympia (pg. 280)
Millennium Ice Re -surfacer
RECOMMENDED:
THAT Council approve the procurement of a new Resurfice 2005 Olympia
Millennium ice re -surfacing machine for the new Aurora Recreation
Complex in the amount of $76,814.25 plus G.S.T.
General Committee Meeting No. 05-16
Tuesday, June 7, 2005
Page 9 of 10
18. LS05-036 — Tender L.S. 2005-32 - Purchase of One (1) (pg. 282)
Full Size Cargo Van
RECOMMENDED:
THAT Council authorize the purchase of one (1) Department of Leisure
Services full size Cargo Van from Unionville Motors Ltd. in the amount of
$29,954.05 less P.S.T. and G.S.T.
19. LS05-038 — New Fire Hall - Approval to Proceed to Tender (pg. 286)
RECOMMENDED:
THAT Council approve the design and layout of the new Fire Hall; and
further
THAT Council authorize staff to proceed with the Tendering process for
the new Fire Hall.
20. LS05-034 — Aurora Historical Society Amending Agreement (pg. 299)
RECOMMENDED:
THAT Council approve the proposed amendments to the existing
Agreement between the Aurora Historical Society and the Town; and
THAT Council authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute on behalf of the
Town;and
THAT if the Amending Agreement is approved that Council appoint two
members to the Historical Society Capital Works Committee.
21. LS05-037 — Public/Private Partnership - Soccer Bubble (pg. 307)
RECOMMENDED:
THAT subject to a satisfactory Agreement between the Town and
1651883 Ontario Inc. that Council approve the construction of a Soccer
Bubble within Lambert Willson Park adjacent to the Royal Canadian
Legion; and
THAT Council waive the requirements for a re -zoning to permit the
construction of a soccer bubble; and
THAT Council waive the requirement to enter into a Site Plan Agreement
for the Project.
General Committee Meeting No. 05-16 Page 10 of 10
Tuesday, June 7, 2005
22. FAC05-01 — May 11, 2005 Finance Advisory Committee Meeting (pg. 326)
Review of the Terms of Reference
(Referred by Council - May 24th, 2005)
RECOMMENDED:
THAT the revised Terms of Reference for the Finance Advisory
Committee, reflecting Council's direction of December 14, 2004, be
approved.
GENERAL COMMITTEE - JUNE 7, 2005
Panizza, Bob
Delegation (a)
From: Jackson, Wayne
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 2:30 PM
To: Clark, Carol
Cc: Rogers, John; Panizza, Bob
Subject: Regional Noise Policy Presentation
Carol
Would you please list Mr. Daniel Kostopoulos and Mr. Dino Basso on the Presentation list for the June 7, 2005 General
Committee meeting. They will be presenting the Region's proposed noise policy.
Thanks.
D - 1
- YIV JIG IJIJ
COMMITTEE — JUNE 7, - 2005 Delegation (b)
CALEARTH 7240 Woodbine Ave., Suite 215
INTERNATIONAL Markham, Ontario, Canada, L3R IA4
DEVELOPMENT INC. Tel: 416 721 1016 Fax: 416 512 1575
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Sent By Fax to No.
905 726 4732
05 05 19
The Town of Aurora
100 John West Way, Box 1000
Aurora ON L4G 01
Attn: Mr. Robert Panizza
Clerk
Re: Continuance of Zoning By-law Amendment Application
15018 Yonge Street, Aurora
Planning File D14-11-03
We are Consulting Engineers and act for the owners on the property noted above
L.�xrc r_
We request to appear as a delegation at your next meeting of the General Committee scheduled for June 7, 200S.
Our clients have very serious concerns with a requested stormceptor and road widening on Kennedy Road. In our
experience they are extremely and unduly onerous for the location and limited size of this property.
We are in the process of preparing a detailed report and shall be presenting a written report to the Clerks Department
next week.
Yours truly,
CALEARTH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT INC.
Consulting Engineers
eery Mintz, P.
Principal Engineer
c. Owners
Ref 15018 Yongo, A¢roro• letter w Town 0505 19.1
D-2
GENERAL C-OMMITTEE" J11NE 7,: 2005
416 b12 1b(b
CALEARTH
INTERNATIONAL
DEVELOPMENT INC.
CONS UL TING ENGINEERS
Mayor and Members of Council
Town of Aurora
100 John West Way
Aurora, Ontario L4G 6J1
Dear Sirs:
7240 Woodbine Ave., Suite 215
Markham, Ontario, Canada, L3R IA4
Tel: 416 721 1016 Fax: 416 512 1575
Sent By Fax to No.
905 726 4732
05 06 01
Re: 15018 Yonge Street, Continuation of Rezoning
We act for the new owners of the property herein.
The property, located at the southwest comer of Yonge Street and Kennedy, is subject to a continued
change of zoning application, which was commenced at the beginning of 2003, by the previous
owners, Abbotsford Animal Hospital. As a condition of this rezoning a Site Plan agreement is
required.
The Site Plan Agreement is completed, except for agreement on two requests by the Town, deemed
very and unduly onerous onto this small property, namely:
1) A 2.5 metres road widening on Kennedy Street, and
2) A quality control structure on the storm water drain from the catch basin to an off street
allowance existing manhole located on the property. to the south, being 15010 Yonge Street, all
as shown on the plan.
With regard to the read widening to be used for the widening of Kennedy Street west of Yonge
Sheet, it appears that, since Council accepted and adopted a report, No.PW01-009 dated May 16
2001 and approved reconstruction of the road based on existing road allowances, the need for this
widening is superfluous and should be deleted.
Secondly, for the Storm water quality control, we have conducted extensive research to establish
current practice with municipalities and storm water control suppliers. The results of the research
show that quality control is utilized in new construction where the control area exceeds 0.2 hectares
or one half acre. This property is not new construction but reconstruction. This control area is 0.02
hectares or 0.05 acres. The requirement of imposing quality control on this area is only one tenth to
that of current practice, and should be deleted.
.: /2
D-3
41b b11 lbfb p."'
GENERAL COMMITTEE. J-UN.E 7, 2005 =
-2-
We appreciate your understanding and cooperation in this matter. The undersigned will be in
attendance at the meeting and shall be pleased to amplify if and as requested.
Yours truly,
CALEARTH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT INC.
Consulting Engineer Engineers and Project Managers
Gerry Mint7, P.Eng-
Principal Engineer
c. Owner, by fax to No. 905 884 0936
W.H. fackson, Director of Public Works, by email to wiacksonntown.aurcra.on.ca
Ref. 15013 Yonge, Aurora letter to Town 05 06 01
®-4
TO:9057i
GENERAL COMMITTEE — JUNE 7, 2005 Delegation (c)
711-40 Harding Blvd. -West
Richmond Hill, ON
L4C 9S5
j.... ...
May 25, 2005
The Town of Aurora
100 John West Way, Box 100
Aurora, ON LAG 6J I
Attn: Mr. Robert Panizza (Clerk):
Re: Continuance of Zoning By-law Amendment Application
15018 Yonge Street, Aurora
Planning File D14-11-03
I am the current owner of the property noted above.
I re as qu t to appear as a delegation at your next meeting of the General Committee scheduled for June
avo-serjoup concerns with a requested stor7neeptor and road widening on Kennedy Road.
It affix a report for the Clerks Department next week.
Topq1ng
PeaseP 1
via fax that I am on the agenda for Juneh 7 2005.
$i I r . Y C i6lyl
Aasit Amin CA.
o. Gerry Mintz
Calearth International Development Inc.
. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
0%,
GENERAL COMMITTEE — JUNE 7, 2005 Delegation(d)
Panizza, Bob
From: Lambertus Dekkema
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 1:00 PM
To: Paniz a, Bob
Cc: Jay Branton; Bert Dekkema
Subject: New Thompson Funeral Home
Bob
Re: Request for change of Address.
Thompson Funeral Home
530 (interim) Industrial parkway S.
Further to our telephone conversation this morning we would like to r
requesting a change of address.
A representative from Tbompsorfs will be addressing the Committee.
Thanks
Bert Dekkema
5/5/2005 D - 6
GENERAL COMMITTEE - JUNE 7, 2005
D-7
Delegation (a)
GENERAL COMMITTEE - JUNE 7, 2005
AGENDA ITEM # y _J
TOWN OF AURORA
GENERAL COMMITTEE No. PL05-047
SUBJECT: Proposed Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District
FROM: Sue Seibert, Director of Planning
DATE: June 7, 2005
RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT the letter from the Olde Aurora Ratepayers Association requesting the
Town proceed with the initiation of a heritage Conservation District Study for
Northeast Old Aurora be received, and
THAT staff be directed to report back to General Committee at the meeting of
June 21, 2005 respecting the following:
• Proposed Heritage Conservation District Study Area boundary;
• Terms of Reference for the Heritage Conservation District Study;
• Request for proposals to undertake the study;
• Selection of a committee to review proposals and recommend to
Council;
• Appointment of a Heritage Conservation District Study Advisory Sub -
Committee;
• Heritage Conservation District Study Area By-law;
AND THAT a Heritage Conservation District Study Sub -Committee be formed.
BACKGROUND
Purpose of report is to inform Council of proposed heritaae district
The purpose of this report is to inform Council of a letter from the Olde Aurora Ratepayers
Association requesting that the Town proceed with the initiation of a heritage conservation
district study under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act for the historic neighbourhood of
Northeast Old Aurora. This report provides background information about heritage
-1-
GENERAL COMMITTEE — JUNE 7, 2005
May17, 2005 - 2 - Report No. PL05-047
conservation districts and how they are established, the process undertaken to date in
Northeast Old Aurora and the steps to be undertaken to initiate the Heritage Conservation
District study.
Heritage Act allows municipalities to designate heritage districts
Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act allows municipalities to identify those areas in the
community which are considered to be of special heritage significance as heritage
conservation districts. Through a district plan, the heritage district is a tool for
municipalities and communities to use to guide change and development within the
district boundary to better ensure that it is compatible with the area's special heritage
character.
The town of Aurora contains a number of historically significant neighbourhoods in the
historic core which are worthy of consideration to become heritage conservation
districts. One of those areas is in the northeast quadrant of the downtown core, a
picturesque neighbourhood of 19th and early 20th Century heritage homes on streets
lined with mature trees.
Proposed Heritage District concept initiated by local residents
The concept of a proposed Heritage Conservation District for the area of Northeast Old
Aurora was initiated by residents of the area approximately two years ago (Figure 1 —
Location of Proposed District). The Town of Aurora Heritage Advisory Committee has
been working with local residents since that time to introduce the concept of a heritage
conservation district and address any questions that local residents may have had
concerning heritage district designation.
Pre -consultation with the public has been undertaken
On Monday, April 11, 2005, a public meeting was held to seek input from the
community of Northeast Old Aurora with respect to the establishment of a proposed
heritage conservation district. The response from the community with respect to the
district designation was positive and as a result a letter has been received from the
Olde Aurora Ratepayers Association requesting that the Town proceed with the study
(See APPENDIX'A'). The Town of Aurora has allocated funding in its budget to
proceed with the study.
The following is a brief description of Heritage Conservation Districts and how they are
implemented.
What is a Heritage District?
A heritage district is a special area made up of buildings, streets and open spaces that
are of historical or architectural significance to a community. These areas are unique
places and are different than other parts of our community. A district is created using
the Ontario Heritage Act, and managed using a Heritage District Plan. Heritage district
designation provides enforceable tools for the municipality to use to protect special
—2—
GENERAL COMMITTEE — JUNE 7, 2005
May17, 2005 - 3 - Report No. PL05-047
areas and guide development within their boundaries.
Heritage district designation does not prevent change. It is a tool for guiding change to
ensure that it is compatible. Heritage districts have been successful tools for
communities and municipalities to use to protect those elements that are significant
about an area and to ensure that new works are respectful of that character. Heritage
districts can be successful in not only stable residential neighbourhoods like Northeast
Old Aurora but also in commercial districts (Port Hope, Stratford Downtown, By -Ward
Market, Ottawa, Goderich Square), Industrial districts (such as Gooderham and Worts,
National Historic District in Toronto), Museum Districts such as Fort York and residential
neighbourhoods undergoing change and intensification/adaptive reuse trends (e.g.
Markham Village, Kleinburg).
There are 53 Heritage Districts in Ontario
Municipalities across Ontario have established heritage conservation districts. To date
there are 53 heritage districts in the Province of Ontario and a further 26 proposed
districts where studies are underway. The City of Toronto has 9 heritage conservation
districts and there are five in York Region (Kleinburg, Thornhill (Vaughan), Thornhill
(Markham), Unionville and Markham Village. The proposed heritage district would be -
the first in the Town of Aurora.
While the Ontario Heritage Act does not require a study for the area, such an
examination provides background to the historical, architectural and character defining
features that make the area special and can help in defining and justifying the final
boundary. Once the heritage district boundary is approved by Council, the Act requires
the municipality to create a district plan be to guide change and development. Heritage
District plans are typically created in consultation with the local community and may
contain a variety of policies and guidelines to guide change and protect the special
heritage character. The local community is encouraged to participate in this process.
After the examination and approval by the Aurora Municipal Heritage Advisory
Committee and Council, Council would pass a by-law that establishes the Heritage
Conservation District.
COMMENTS
Heritage District identification is consistent with Official Plan
The identification and designation of heritage conservation districts is consistent with
the goals, Objectives and Policies of the Official Plan ((1991), January 2005 Office
Consolidation)) which are outlined as follows:
—3—
GENERAL COMMITTEE — JUNE 7, 2005
May17, 2005 - 4 - Report No. PL05-047
Town of Aurora, Official Plan
Part Three — Planning Components
3.8 Heritage
GOAL
Aurora's Heritage shall be preserved to enhance the community.
OBJECTIVES
A. Encourage identification, research, evaluation, classification
and where applicable, designation of Aurora's heritage.
B. Use available sources of funding and legislation, such as the
Ontario Heritage Act, to achieve heritage preservation
C. Safeguard heritage resources as part of the planned framework of
the changing community and as vital components of community
life.
D. Ensure that private and public development, redevelopment
and intensification are compatible with the preservation of
Aurora's Heritage
E. Encourage people in Aurora to learn about, care for and enjoy their
heritage.
F. Participate in joint private/public projects to achieve heritage
preservation.
POLICIES
a. Heritage shall include built and natural resources of archaeological,
historical, architectural, recreational, aesthetic and scenic value.
Built heritage resources shall include buildings, groupings of
buildings, their surroundings, streetscapes, districts and
neighbourhoods. Natural heritage resources shall include
cemeteries, landscapes, parks, vistas, open spaces and areas of
special vegetation, including mature trees, and hedgerows.
c. The Historic Core Community Commercial Centre and the
adjacent neighbourhoods formed the town of Aurora of the 19tn
Century. The Old Post Office, Trinity Anglican and Canada
Methodist Churches, the Hillary House, Fleury Implements factory
—4—
GENERAL COMMITTEE — JUNE 7, 2005
May17, 2005 - 5 - Report No. PL05-047
and the Railway Station are just a few of the buildings which bear
testimony to this era. This area shall be considered for designation
as a Heritage Conservation District, based on an appropriate plan.
e. Council shall achieve the goal and objectives of this Section of the
Plan by applying the following sections of the Ontario Heritage
Act, R.S. O. 1980,
The power to pass by-laws to evaluate an area for
future designation as a Heritage Conservation District.
A Heritage Conservation District Plan will include
policies respecting the protection and enhancement of
the district and conservation and design guidelines for
both existing building and new construction. The
Heritage Conservation District Plan will be prepared in
accordance with the guidelines established by the
Ministry of Culture and Communications;
m. Council shall cooperate with other local agencies such as the
Heritage Committee, the Aurora Historical Society and the Boards
of Education as well as with developers, business groups and other
citizens' groups to achieve:
i. the preservation of Aurora's heritage
ii. the public's awareness, involvement and enjoyment of
Aurora's heritage.
Northeast Old Aurora has attributes worthy of a heritage district
The area of Northeast old Aurora which is proposed for study as a heritage
conservation district consists of approximately 85 properties along Fleury Street and
parts of Catherine Street, Maple Street, Spruce Street, and a small section of frontage
on Yonge Street (Figure 1 — Proposed District ). The architecture of the area consists
primarily of attractive late 19th Century and early 20th Century single family homes.
(Figure 2- Map Heritage Buildings, Figure 3 — Photographs of buildings). With its
historical architecture and tree -lined streets, the area, is a special place which helps to
re -enforce the human scale village -like ambience of the core area and is worthy of
protection.
The proposed Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District represents an
opportunity for the Town to recognize a significant neighbourhood of historical homes in
the downtown core. The district would give the municipality the necessary tools to
protect the special character of that neighbourhood by allowing the review of
alterations, additions and new construction to ensure compatibility and to provide
guidance in the form of a heritage conservation district plan.
—5—
GENERAL COMMITTEE — JUNE 7, 2005
May17 2005 - 6 - Report No. PL05-047
Local residents of the heritage conservation district would benefit from enhanced
neighbourhood stability, compatible property improvements and possibly increased
property values, the whole community shares in the positive aspects of heritage district
designation.
Similar efforts in other municipalities have shown that the entire community can benefit
from the designation of a heritage conservation district. By acknowledging special
areas a heritage districts, it helps people to see the area in a different light. What was
once another neighbourhood of older buildings will become recognized as an area of
special significance to the history of a municipality that provides a community focal point
enhances an overall sense of community pride. Heritage districts status can enhance
opportunities for tourism such as walking tours. It may encourage local residents and
visitors alike to visit and enjoy the historical ambience. A successfully implemented
heritage district can provide a demonstration for appropriate preservation and sensitive
enhancement in other parts of the Historic Core and may inspire similar community
based neighbourhood preservation efforts. The successful heritage district would also
demonstrate Aurora's corporate commitment to heritage conservation as part of its
progressive approach to urban planning.
tire-consugation wrul ine pumic nab ueen unue7Laieeu — 1!SS� nua. auivcv, wcua nv
Although there will be public consultation throughout the formal heritage district study
process, extensive pre -consultation with the public has been undertaken, by the Olde
Aurora Ratepayers Association with the assistance of the Aurora Heritage Committee
and Town staff. The meeting Monday, April 11th was the third such meeting over the
past 2 years to present the heritage district concept and answer questions, and address
issues that the residents wanted to discuss. Surveys have also been distributed in the
neighbourhood, the results of which have demonstrated a widespread community
support for the district. Through a heritage district study process further consultation
with residents and public meetings will be undertaken.
Maple Catherine Fleury and parts of Spruce and Yonge have been the primary
focus of pre -consultation
The area of the historic core that has been the focus of pre -consultation efforts to date
is the historic residential area of northeast Old Aurora, which was established by
historic 19ih and 20ih Century plans of subdivision. The area consists of 85 properties in
a core area, centering on Catherine, Maple, Fleury and part of Spruce Streets
The Olde Aurora Ratepayers Association has undertaken a considerable amount of
effort to communicate the heritage district concept with the property owners in the
neighbourhood, answer questions and address issues. The results of these efforts
have demonstrated a significant level of support for the heritage conservation district
concept in the neighbourhood.
GENERAL COMMITTEE — JUNE 7, 2005
May17, 2005 -7- Report No. PL05-047
Survey feedback from owners in the proposed study area
Properties
%
Number of owners in favour:
62
73%
Number of undecided
7
8%
Non responses
16
19%
Not in favour
2
2.4%
Total Number of Properties
85
The level of support for the district designation is impressive, particularly when it is
considered that the actual study and work of the professional consultants has not yet
begun.
While it is not necessary, nor usual that all residents be in favour of the district
designation, efforts will be made prior to and during the district study process to meet
with the 2 homeowners, and others who may be undecided and further explain the
heritage district concept and to determine ways that their concerns can be addressed.
Interest expressed in expanding study area boundary
Through the public consultation process for the core area, it became evident that there
was significant public interest raised in extending boundary of the area to be studied for
heritage district designation. In consideration of this request, 80 additional properties
other adjacent areas which form a natural continuation of the core study area such as
parts of Mark Street, Centre Street, the eastern part of Catherine Street, McMahon Park
and the heritage buildings immediately to the north of the Core area fronting onto
Yonge Street are being considered for inclusion within the area for study (Figure 4 —
Potential boundary expansion).
Formal study area boundary is being determined
The recommended boundary for the area to be studied for potential heritage
conservation district designation is currently being reviewed by the Town (Community
Planner) in consultation with the Olde Aurora Ratepayers Association. It will be
considered by the Aurora Heritage Committee at its June 13, 2005 meeting and by the
General Committee at its June 21, 2005 meeting.
Inclusion of a broader study area would have a number of benefits
The inclusion of these streets would:
a) Allow for the district study to consider the entire historic residential neighbourhood
of northeast Old Aurora;
b) Allow for flexibility in determining the final district boundary in the event that there
is sufficient heritage merit and public support in these outer areas to justify their
inclusion. (Once a study has begun areas beyond the study area boundary cannot
—7—
GENERAL COMMITTEE — JUNE 7, 2005
May17 2005 - 8 - Report No. PL05-047
be included in the final heritage district boundary);
c) Eliminate the need and expense for further district studies being undertaken to add
the additional streets in the district at a later date, if there is sufficient interest
among local residents to include them now.
Residents of adjoining areas have been contacted
The Olde Aurora Ratepayers association has been endeavouring to consult the owners
of property in these areas to determine the level of interest in being included in the
heritage district study.
While the efforts to contact property owners of adjoining areas are ongoing, the Olde
Aurora Ratepayers Association has reported that a significant majority of property
owners on the eastern part of Catherine Street and a number of property owners on
Centre Street between Spruce Street and Walton Drive are interested in being part of
the heritage district study area.
It should be noted that the study area boundary is not necessarily the final boundary of
the heritage conservation district. It is a typical result of most heritage district studies
that final district boundary does not necessarily include all of the area that had been
subject to study.
For the purposes of this study, the proposed boundary has been selected to take in as
complete an area as possible of the northeast old Aurora neighbourhood, while also
taking into account initial feedback from property owners. Since the study process will
provide future opportunities for public consultation and boundary adjustment, where on
a section of street a majority of property owners have expressed an interest or no
concern at being part of the Heritage Conservation District study, the entire section of
street are proposed to be included.
Staff and consultants will work to address outstanding issues raised
Where people on those streets have concerns with being included in the final heritage
district, staff and the consultant would work with them to address any remaining
concerns in order to ensure that there is a general consensus in the community with the
final district boundary.
A terms of reference has been prepared
A draft terms of reference for the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District
study has been prepared, reviewed and endorsed by the Aurora Heritage Advisory
Committee. Once the boundary of the study area has been determined through
consultation with the Olde Aurora Ratepayers Association and the Heritage Advisory
committee, the draft terms of reference will be forwarded to the General Committee at
GENERAL COMMITTEE — JUNE 7, 2005
May17, 2005 - 9 - Report No. PL06-047
its meeting on June 21, 2005 as part of a further report on the Heritage Conservation
District Study.
A study advisory sub -committee should be created
Community input is important to the successes of any heritage conservation district
study process. In most cases this is achieved through the appointment of a district
study advisory sub -committee, Comprised of Town staff, elected members of Council,
members of the Local Heritage Advisory Committee and representatives of the local
community. It is recommended that the advisory sub -committee for the Northeast Old
Aurora Heritage Conservation District Study be comprised of the following:
- 1 or more members of Council
2 members of the Heritage Advisory Committee of Aurora
- . 1 member of the Aurora Historical Society
- 3 members of the Olde Aurora Ratepayers Association
1 member of staff (Community Planner)
The mandate of the advisory sub -committee will be to advise staff and the consultants
on local matters, provide a community perspective, review work undertaken by the
consultant and assist during any public participation component of the study.
The study will report through the Heritage Committee and be coordinated by the
Community Planner
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The overall budget for the study will be $45,000
Staff. has identified the following guidelines for the study budget and.schedule:
• The study will have a maximum budget of $45,000 inclusive of GST as provided
for in the 2005 budget for the Policy Division of the Planning and Development
Services Department;
• The study will be divided into two phases; and
• The study will be completed within approximately 6 months of the execution of
the study contract.
The study will require a consultant team with expertise in heritage district policy
planning, community consultation and facilitation, and graphics and illustrations.
M
GENERAL COMMITTEE — JUNE 7,- 2005
May17, 2005 -10 - Report No. PL05-047
CONCLUSIONS
The proposed Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District study represents an
opportunity for the Town to recognize a significant neighbourhood of historical homes in the
town centre. The district would give the municipality the necessary tools to protect the
special character of that neighbourhood by allowing the review of alterations, additions and
new construction to ensure that they are compatible and to provide guidance in the form of
a heritage conservation district plan.
The establishment of a heritage district is something of benefit to all residents of Aurora by
a mechanism for the preservation and enhancement of a visible and historically significant
neighbourhood in the historic core, creating an inspiration for similar efforts elsewhere in
the core, reinforcing the sense of history of the community, providing opportunities for
tourism such as walking tours and demonstrating the town's commitment to heritage
conservation.
The process that has been undertaken to date has largely been initiated and carried out by
local residents and has resulted in a significant level of demonstrated community support
for the district concept. The result of this extensive grassroots effort will be a greater
certainty of success with respect to community support for approval of the district and its
long-term implementation.
It is important that the local community continue to participate in the formal heritage
conservation district designation process. To achieve this, staff is recommending the
formation of a Heritage Conservation District Advisory sub -committee of the Heritage
Advisory Committee of Aurora, to provide a community perspective, review work
undertaken by the consultant and assist during any public participation component of the
study. Appointments to the sub -committee would be recommended by the Heritage
Advisory Committee of Aurora. Outside Groups (Ratepayers and Historical Society) would
be invited to nominate suggested members to fill the positions allocated to these groups.
Once a final study area boundary is identified, Staff will bring back a further report to the
General committee with respect to the terms of reference, consultant selection, study area
by-law, advisory sub -committee and timeline.
Staff has identified the General Committee as an appropriate forum for obtaining Council
input and feedback on the consultant study findings and recommendations at key stages of
the work program.
The Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District study process is intended to be
inclusive, with a broad a base of support within the community, and which will provide a
guideline for the community to work towards to achieve common neighbourhood goals of
celebrating the special aspects of the neighbourhood and guiding new development so that
it is respectful of the area's historic character.
The resulting plan for the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage district will be illustrative and
—10—
GENERAL COMMITTEE - JUNE 7, 2005
May17, 2005 -11 - Report No. PL05-047
attractive in its layout and presentation, clear and concise in its message, and will
recognize the needs of its intended audience, the public.
LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN
Aurora's Strategic Plan calls for continued well planned growth and conservation of the
built and natural heritage. The establishment of a heritage conservation district is
consistent with these goals.
ATTACHMENTS
Figure 1 Location Map —Proposed Northeast Old Aurora Heritage District Study Area
Figure 2 Area Map — Proposed Northeast Old Aurora Heritage District Study Area
Figure 3 Photographs — Proposed Northeast Old Aurora Heritage District
Figure 4 Area Map — Additional areas considered for inclusion in the Olde Aurora
Heritage Conservation District Study Area.
APPENDIX A — Letter from the Olde Aurora Ratepayers Association
PRE -SUBMISSION REVIEW
Management Team, June 1, 2005
Prepared by: Michael Seaman ext. 4351
Left, MCIP; RPP
of Planning
-11-
m
I
� IIIII
M 7ft7 v1N
L"��
9N-
z
0-
CD
z
LU
f-M
co 0
a IX
0.1
LLIO uj
w", 0 or) t<
eL z
OD m
wo LU
M M x
0 [77j"
a w
w
to0
0
0
M w
0. M
z g
U) 0
W
QQ
a.
O..j
O
aye
w
LU
w
xzaj
-6 I
GENERAL COMMITTEE - JUNE 7, 2005
FIGURE 3
PROPOSED NORTHEAST OLD AURORA HERITAGE DISTRICT
PHOTOGRAPHS
Fleury Street
Catherine Avenue
—14—
GENERAL COMMITTEE — JUNE 7, 2005
Yonge Street
Hillary House — Yonge Street
—15—
�;,
��
r �� -