Agenda - Environmental Advisory Committee - 20220504Town of Aurora
Environmental Advisory Committee
Meeting Agenda
Date:Wednesday, May 4, 2022
Time:7 p.m.
Location:Video Conference
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, meetings will be available to the public via live stream only on
the Town’s YouTube Channel. To participate electronically, please visit aurora.ca/participation.
Pages
1.Call to Order
2.Land Acknowledgement
3.Approval of the Agenda
4.Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
5.Receipt of the Minutes
5.1.Environmental Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of February 23,
2022
1
That the Environmental Advisory Committee meeting minutes of
February 23, 2022, be received for information.
6.Delegations
7.Matters for Consideration
7.1.Memorandum from Energy and Climate Change Analyst; Re: Climate
Change Adaptation Plan
6
(Presentation to be provided by Lisa MacTavish, Advisor, Climate Change
Risk and Resilience, and Christina Schwantes, Specialist, Climate Change,
Resilience and Sustainability, WSP)
That the memorandum regarding Climate Change Adaptation
Plan be received; and
1.
That the Environmental Advisory Committee comments
regarding Climate Change Adaptation Plan be received and
2.
referred to staff for consideration and further action as
appropriate.
7.2.Memorandum from Economic Development Officer; Re: Community
Improvement Plan Review Consultation
36
That the memorandum regarding Community Improvement Plan
Review Consultation be received; and
1.
That the Environmental Advisory Committee comments
regarding Community Improvement Plan Review Consultation be
received and referred to staff for consideration and further
action as appropriate.
2.
8.Informational Items
8.1.Environmental Advisory Committee Update List 67
That the Environmental Advisory Committee Update List be
received for information.
1.
9.Adjournment
1
Town of Aurora
Environmental Advisory Committee
Meeting Minutes
Date:
Time:
Location:
Wednesday, February 23, 2022
7 p.m.
Video Conference
Committee Members: Councillor Rachel Gilliland (Chair)
Councillor Wendy Gaertner (Vice Chair)
Barry Bridgeford
Colin Brown
Sam Cunningham
Ryan Hamid
Members Absent: Margaret Baker
Ashley Gatto Cassagrande
Sandy Hudson
Crystal Robertson
Other Attendees: Matthew Volpintesta, Senior Policy Planner
Natalie Kehle, Analyst, Energy and Climate Change
Samantha Yew, Deputy Town Clerk
Linda Bottos, Council/Committee Coordinator
_____________________________________________________________________
1. Call to Order
The Chair called the meeting to order at 7:13 p.m.
The Committee consented to extend the hour to 9:15 p.m.
1.1 Appointment of Chair and Vice Chair
Moved by Councillor Gaertner
Seconded by Sam Cunningham
Page 1 of 67
2
1. That Councillor Rachel Gilliland be re-elected as Chair for Year 2022 of
the Environmental Advisory Committee (2018-2022 Term).
Carried
Moved by Colin Brown
Seconded by Ryan Hamid
2. That Councillor Wendy Gaertner be re-elected as Vice Chair for Year
2022 of the Environmental Advisory Committee (2018-2022 Term).
Carried
2. Approval of the Agenda
Moved by Ryan Hamid
Seconded by Barry Bridgeford
That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved.
Carried
3. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
There were no declarations of pecuniary interest under the Municipal Conflict of
Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M.50.
4. Receipt of the Minutes
4.1 Environmental Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of November 24, 2021
Moved by Sam Cunningham
Seconded by Ryan Hamid
That the Environmental Advisory Committee meeting minutes of
November 24, 2021, be received for information.
Carried
5. Delegations
None.
6. Matters for Consideration
6.1 Memorandum from Senior Policy Planner; Re: Green Development
Standards Update - Phase 1 Planned Implementation
Page 2 of 67
3
Staff provided an overview of the memorandum including a presentation
of the draft web-based online development application form, submission
criteria, incentives, development review process, implementation phases,
and the Green Development Standards (GDS) Handbook. The Committee
provided feedback and discussed various aspects with staff including pre-
consultation, developer incentives and benefits, phase implementation
timelines, verification of criteria responses, scoring and flexibility,
holdbacks, smart metering and utility monitoring, mandatory vs optional
criteria, concern about creating further disparity in housing, focus on
complete communities, permeable surfaces, tree planting guidelines,
electric vehicle charging infrastructure, and recognition of good GDS
stewardship.
Moved by Councillor Gaertner
Seconded by Colin Brown
1. That the memorandum regarding Green Development Standards
Update – Phase 1 Planned Implementation be received; and
2. That the Environmental Advisory Committee comments regarding the
Green Development Standards Update – Phase 1 Planned
Implementation be received and referred to staff for consideration and
further action as appropriate.
Carried
6.2 Memorandum from Energy and Climate Change Analyst; Re: Anti-Idling
Policy Update
Staff provided an overview of the memorandum and sought Committee
input on the proposed policy changes and seasonal/targeted education
campaigns. The Committee expressed support for the policy changes,
including the reduced idling limit, and provided input on various aspects
including background, education, signage, and decals. The Committee
inquired about opportunities to address institutionalized idling and
pollution, and staff provided a response.
Moved by Ryan Hamid
Seconded by Colin Brown
1. That the memorandum regarding Anti-Idling Policy Update be received;
and
Page 3 of 67
4
2. That the Environmental Advisory Committee comments regarding the
Anti-Idling Policy Update be received and referred to staff for
consideration and further action as appropriate.
Carried
7. Informational Items
7.1 Environmental Advisory Committee Update List
Staff provided a brief overview of the purpose of the Update List and the
Committee expressed support for this new standing information item to
be updated for each meeting.
Moved by Barry Bridgeford
Seconded by Ryan Hamid
1. That the Environmental Advisory Committee Update List be received
for information.
Carried
7.2 Town of Aurora Report: The Economic Value of Natural Capital Assets
Associated With Ecosystem Protection (dated June 2013)
The Committee spoke to the June 2013 report and its references to
certain properties identified as having specific environmental value to the
Town, namely the Case Woodlot, Sheppard’s Bush Conservation Area,
Vandorf Woodlot, McKenzie Marsh, Anne Bartley Smith Property, and the
Stronach Eco-Park. Staff provided context on the intent of the report and
the Committee provided feedback and discussed the merits of obtaining
an update on the health and economic value of the Town’s ecosystem
services. The Committee further clarified its request for a stewardship
update on the field projects and management plans for the specified
properties that have been finalized and performed over the past decade,
and the Chair and Vice Chair agreed to submit a notice of motion for
Council’s consideration.
Moved by Barry Bridgeford
Seconded by Councillor Gaertner
1. That the Town of Aurora Report: The Economic Value of Natural
Capital Assets Associated With Ecosystem Protection (dated June
2013) be received; and
Page 4 of 67
5
2. That the Environmental Advisory Committee comments regarding the
Town of Aurora Report: The Economic Value of Natural Capital Assets
Associated With Ecosystem Protection (dated June 2013) be received
and referred to staff for consideration and further action as
appropriate.
Carried
8. Adjournment
Moved by Colin Brown
Seconded by Sam Cunningham
That the meeting be adjourned at 9:16 p.m.
Carried
Page 5 of 67
100 John West Way
Aurora, Ontario
L4G 6J1
(905) 727-3123
aurora.ca
Town of Aurora
Memorandum
PDS -Engineering
Re: Climate Change Adaptation Plan
To: Environmental Advisory Committee
From: Natalie Kehle, Energy and Climate Change Analyst
Date: May 4, 2022
Recommendation
1. That the memorandum regarding Climate Change Adaptation Plan be received; and
2. That the Environmental Advisory Committee comments regarding Climate Change
Adaptation Plan be received and referred to staff for consideration and further action
as appropriate.
Executive Summary
The Town of Aurora has been undertaking the development of a Climate Change
Adaptation Plan (CCAP) which aims to conduct a climate change vulnerability and risk
assessment and develop an action plan that informs asset management planning and
increase the resilience of the Town of Aurora’s infrastructure. The project covers four
Town asset categories: linear infrastructure (roads, stormwater), water infrastructure,
parks and natural heritage and facilities. The following report presents an update of the
work completed to date, highlights the initial feedback from stakeholders, sets out next
steps and the expected final deliverables and outcomes of the CCAP.
The Climate Change Adaptation Plan assesses the risks and vulnerabilities of
Town-owned infrastructure from a changing climate.
The preliminary results of the risk and vulnerability assessment identified
medium risks areas to Town infrastructure but no high-risk areas.
Page 6 of 67
Climate Change Adaptation Plan
May 4, 2022 Page 2 of 6
Background
Climate change mitigation and adaptation measures
Climate change actions fall into two categories, both essential. Mitigation measures
reduce the emissions of harmful greenhouse gases that cause climate change
(example: upgrading an old gas furnace with a high efficient heat pump). On the other
hand, Adaptation measures prepare societies for a changing climate to avoid damages
or harm (example: increasing the size of storm water culverts to reducing the risk of
flooding due to more frequent and extreme rainfall events).
Climate impact, risks and vulnerability assessments are used to identify the nature and
magnitude of a changing climate and identify measures needed to protect
infrastructure (example: water/ waste systems, roads, storm water infrastructure and
buildings). These measures are the central recommendations from an adaptation plan.
Public Infrastructure and a Changing Climate
A changing climate and more extreme weather events are exposing Canada’s public
infrastructure to impacts it was not originally designed to withstand.
Infrastructure design has traditionally relied on historical climate data to design long-
lasting, safe and reliable infrastructure, but now must be adjusted and/or involve new
design and operation practices to accommodate increased uncertainties of future
climate events.
Investment in Town-owned infrastructure is significant, with an estimated $301.7
million worth of cumulative capital cost in the next 10-year period (2022-2031),
according to the 2021 Asset Management Plan and the latest investment assessment.
The Town has the responsibility to protect public investment from extreme weather
events, minimize service disruptions and reduce public health risks by designing,
building and maintaining infrastructure that adapts to the impacts of a changing
climate.
Policy Context
An adaptation plan is the assessment of the risks and vulnerabilities of municipal
infrastructure from a changing climate; a regulatory requirement under several
provincial policies, including:
Page 7 of 67
Climate Change Adaptation Plan
May 4, 2022 Page 3 of 6
O. Reg. 588/17 Asset Management Planning for Municipal Infrastructure
A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019)
Provincial Policy Statement (PPS, 2020)
Analysis
The Climate Change Adaptation Plan assesses the risks and vulnerabilities of Town-
owned infrastructure from a changing climate.
To comply with the Growth Plan 2019, Provincial Policy Statement 2020, O. Reg. 588/17,
and Aurora’s Strategic Asset Management Policy, WSP was retained to develop an
adaptation plan for Town-owned infrastructure that:
Reviews local climate data and climate projections to understand the nature,
severity and probability of future climate changes in Aurora;
Outlines the Town’s vulnerability to extreme weather events and impacts to
public infrastructure;
Identifies risks and opportunities to public infrastructure and estimates the
anticipated costs that could arise from damages or service disruptions;
Prioritizes risks and opportunities and determines the adaptation measures
required to increase resiliency, and;
Integrates a climate lens into Town decision-making that informs Town staff and
Council.
Town-owned infrastructure included in this project are:
Asset Type 1 – Linear Engineering Assets (roads, storm water management
assets)
Asset Type 2 – Water Infrastructure Assets
Asset Type 3 – Parks and Natural Heritage System Assets
Asset Type 4 – Facilities (buildings)
The development of the Plan follows the latest Engineers Canada – Public Infrastructure
and Engineering Vulnerability Committee (PIEVC) Protocol
The goal of the project is to evaluate vulnerabilities of Town infrastructure assets to
extreme weather events and future expected changes in climate and to enable better
planning towards ensuring climate resilient infrastructure. The risk and vulnerability
assessment follows a methodology compliant with the PIEVC Protocol, used to assess
Page 8 of 67
Climate Change Adaptation Plan
May 4, 2022 Page 4 of 6
public infrastructure risk in a changing climate. The project followed the completing of
the following tasks:
Task 1 - Town of Aurora Stakeholder Consultation (throughout the project): the
Resilient Infrastructure Working Group was created at the start of the project and
included Town stakeholders from areas such as Climate Change Planning, Asset
Management, Linear and Water Infrastructure Engineering, Parks and Natural
Heritage, Facilities, Emergency response, Finance, Legal and any other relevant
infrastructure decision-makers. Consultation occurred during key tasks and for each
asset category, including identifying and evaluating risks, and developing adaptation
and implementation measures. Engagement activities included interviews and a
virtual workshop. The engagement process consolidated practical and experiential
knowledge from stakeholders and built institutional resilience through an improved
understanding of climate risks, organizational risk tolerance, and climate-informed
decision making.
Task 2 - Establishing the Context (completed): focused on gathering all relevant
baseline information about Town assets and understanding the exposure to
changing climate and weather conditions.
Task 3 - Risk Identification (completed): climate and weather-related impacts to
infrastructure (or ‘interactions’) were identified for each asset component. Risk
owners and existing control measures were also documented to enable
development of further adaptation actions and risk treatments.
Task 4 - Risk Analysis and Evaluation (completed): a more detailed analysis of
climate-infrastructure risks was performed to estimate the likelihoods and
consequences of impacts that were carried forward from the previous phase. For
each climate-infrastructure interaction, a risk rating was developed considering
financial impacts, impacts to town services, social and health and safety risks, and
environmental impacts. A scale from low severity (no loss of serviceability) to high
severity (complete loss of the asset) was used to assess potential consequences of
climate-infrastructure interactions.
Task 5 - Risk Treatment and Adaptation Measures (under-development): Based on the
results of the vulnerability and risk assessment, a prioritized list of treatment and
adaptation measures were developed to minimize the highest identified risks to the
Town infrastructure. Prioritization of actions, feasibility and implementation
considerations such as cost and schedule are being established. The
Page 9 of 67
Climate Change Adaptation Plan
May 4, 2022 Page 5 of 6
implementation plan will include each action, description, climate risks addressed,
estimated cost and resourcing, timing (short-, medium-, or long-term), action ‘
owner,’ and implications for design guidelines, criteria, plans and policies. Action
co-benefits and implementation drivers and constraints will also be identified. The
actions will be provided in table format, optimal for sorting by relevant department,
priority level, climate risk, timing, action or asset category.
Task 6 - Final Report and Council Presentation (under-development): a final report
summarizing the climate vulnerability and risk assessment is being developed,
containing adaptation actions and the implementation plan, and stakeholder
engagement conducted throughout the project.
Next steps: Town stakeholders are in the process of providing valuable feedback on the
draft implementation plan. Based on that feedback and from the Environmental
Advisory Committee, WSP is finalizing the plan and creating risk maps. Once completed,
the draft Climate Change Adaptation Plan will go to Council.
Summary of Preliminary Results
The preliminary results of the risk and vulnerability assessment identified low and
medium risks areas to Town infrastructure but no high-risk areas.
The climate change projection data analysis identified trends that the Town of Aurora
may expect to see in the near term, between 2021 and 2050 onwards. The most likely
trend to occur is an increase in temperatures, and this will impact several climate and
weather parameters;
- Mean summer maximum temperatures are projected to increase by 9%,
- The number of heat waves are projected to increase from 1.2 to 3.6 per year,
- Cooling Degree Days (used for cooling system design and planning) are
projected to almost double (increase of 86%),
- Winter temperatures are expected to increase, leading to a reduction in extreme
cold risks, snow depth, and annual freeze-thaw cycles (although freeze-thaw
cycles concentrated in winter months may still be damaging to infrastructure).
Otherwise, precipitation, wind, and low air quality events associated with wildfires are
also projected to increase in the future. These climate trends were evaluated against
the Town’s infrastructure to determine where vulnerabilities may exist.
Page 10 of 67
Climate Change Adaptation Plan
May 4, 2022 Page 6 of 6
The climate change risk assessment completed using the PIEVC protocol resulted in 60
medium risks and no high risks. The highest risks identified in this assessment were
associated with the stormwater and sanitary systems due to potential risk of flooding
and backups, HVAC systems in facilities needing to manage higher temperatures in the
future, and playing field maintenance after both heatwaves and flooding events which
may become more frequent in the future.
Recommendations for how the Town can adapt asset management practices to
address climate risks were provided by the consultant’s team of Subject Matter Experts.
Next steps include the development of an Implementation Plan, identifying Town roles
and responsibilities, actions, and budget implications. The Implementation Plan
describes these recommendations and details on how they may be implemented
including their priority, duration, and order of magnitude costs.
The Implementation Plan will provide the Town with a list of adaptation actions to
address the highest risks identified in the Climate Change Risk Assessment.
Attachments
Attachment 1 –Climate Change Adaptation Plan Presentation
Page 11 of 67
Attachment 1 May 4, 2022 Town of Aurora Climate Change Adaptation Plan Environmental Advisory Committee Meeting – Summary Presentation Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Plan 1 Page 12 of 67
Objectives Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Plan Agenda • Introductions and project scope • Climate change overview • Risk assessment process • Present findings • Top risks • Recommendations • Conclusion & Next Steps 2 Page 13 of 67
3Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Plan Project overview Town of Aurora Climate Change Adaptation Plan Assess current and future climate risks to Town Assets • Linear Engineering Assets (roads, storm water management assets) • Water Infrastructure Assets • Parks and Natural Heritage Assets • Facilities Adaptation measures Identify adaptation actions to address the top vulnerabilities and risks to each asset type. Adaptation Plan to improve resilience of Town Assets Create an Adaptation Plan to help coordinate and implement various actions and address climate risks for each asset type. Page 14 of 67
Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Plan Climate Change Mitigation vs Adaptation Two complementary approaches Calgary’s Climate Program (2018) 4 Page 15 of 67
Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Planro Climate Trends in Ontario ra Climate Adaptatio PPPn PPPP PPPPP PPPP lananlanlanlanllananlllllllll Extreme years New norm • Extremes are becoming the new norms • Temperature increase has been accelerating 5 Page 16 of 67
n ooooouuuuuaaaaa6Town of Aurora Climate Adaptat AdaAdaAdaAdaAdaAdaAdaAdaAdaAdaAdaAdaAdaAdaAdaAdaAdaAdaAdaAdadaAdaAAdappptptptptptptptptptptptptptptptptptptptptaaaaaaaaaaaaaaattion Plannn n n n nnnn n n n nntiAAdadaa otiottiotiotiotiotiotiotitititititiStream erosion affecting roads Past Events (What We Heard – Town Staff Interviews July 2021) Strong wind damage Heatwaves affecting people & buildings TowTowTowTowwTowTowToww TowTowTowwwwwfAfAfAfAfAfAfAfAfAfAfAfAfAfAfAfAfAfAfAAfAAA f urourourourourourururururururururururururTowTowTowTowTowTowTowTowTowTowTowTowwTowowww TowwTowwowowowTowoooTooToooo ooooo o TT TTTTTT n on on oononononononon oonon onon on ooon oooo o nn nnnnnnnn nn f Af Af Af Af Af Af AAfAAAf AA Af AAAf Af AAAAAAA AAAAA fff roroooorooooooo ooooooo ooooooooourouro ooo ooooooour oooo ooooooourooo ooooooo oooooooooo ror rrrru uuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuu aaaaaaraaararar rrrr riiiiiiii iCllClClClCl matmatmatmatmatmatmatmatmatatatmatmatmattmamamamamamamamam mmmmmmm meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeAdChallenges maintaining cooling for Flooding affecting parking lots Heavy rainfall, roof leakage ice Photos Oakland University, Athletica Sports Systems Inc., White House Roofing and Construction, the Weather Network, Clackamas Soil and Water Conservation District, YorkRegion.com Page 17 of 67
Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Plan Climate Change Hazards Higher average temperatures and extreme heat Temperatures will be higher on average year round. The number of hot days (days over 30 degrees) will increase. Freeze thaw cycles Freeze thaw patterns will shift in frequency and timing. With warmer temperatures, freeze thaw is likely to become more concentrated during winter months. Dry conditions and drought Rising temperature and changes in precipitation and evapotranspirtation patterns may cause more frequent and longer dry periods. Increase in average precipitation More precipitation is expected to fall on an annual basis, particularly in spring, fall and winter. Heavy precipitation and flooding Rainfall will become more frequent and intense. More rain will fall on a typical rainy day and during storm events (e.g. 1-50 year storms). Severe weather Strong wind gusts and lightning impacts may increase as global temperatures continue to rise. 7 Page 18 of 67
Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Plan Risk Assessment Process 8 Page 19 of 67
Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Plan Applying the PIEVC Protocol The PIEVC Protocol (Public Infrastructure Engineering Vulnerability Committee) is a tool that supports the systematic assessment of the risks posed by extreme weather and future climate to public infrastructure. • Analyzes historical climate information and future probability and severity of climate risks. • Assesses adaptive capacity of infrastructure systems as determined by design, operation and maintenance. • Estimates severity of climate impacts on the infrastructure (e.g., deterioration, damage or destruction) to enable the identification of higher risk components. • Results can be used to inform decisions on which assets require adaptation and how to adapt them (e.g. design adjustments, changes to operations or maintenance). Town staff input 9 Page 20 of 67
Risk Assessment Likelihood x Consequence = Risk 10 Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Plan Page 21 of 67
Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Plan Risk Assessment Likelihood What is the likelihood that future climate conditions are going to impact the Town’s infrastructure? x Consequence = Risk 11 Page 22 of 67
Risk Assessment Consequence If an impact does occur, how severe would the consequences be? Likelihood x = Risk Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Plan 12 Page 23 of 67
RiskRisk Assessment Risk Likelihood x Consequence = Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Plan Risk range Threshold Response < 12 Low risk No action necessary. 12 – 36 Low medium risk (12-25) Action and/or an engineering analysis may be required. High medium risk (26-36) > 36 High risk Action required. 13 Page 24 of 67
Risk Summary Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Plan INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY RELEVANT INTER-ACTIONS OPPOR-TUNITIES LOW RISKS MEDIUM RISKS HIGH RISKS Linear Engineered Assets Road Network 27 6 16 5 0 Stormwater Network 47 11 24 12 0 Water Infrastructure Water Network 19 4 12 3 0 Sanitary Network 29 4 12 13 0 Park and Natural Heritage system 33 1 21 11 0 Facilities 31 3 12 16 0 Total 186 29 97 60 0 14 Page 25 of 67
Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation PlanRecommendations 15 Page 26 of 67
Linear Engineered Assets Actions focus on: • improving the resilience of the stormwater system to both extreme precipitation and drought events. • improving road maintenance and operations to manage increasing degradation from shifting temperatures and extreme events. Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Plan 16 Page 27 of 67
Water Infrastructure Actions focus on: • understanding the capacity and vulnerability of water and sanitary networks to manage risk related to heavy precipitation and severe weather events Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Plan 17 Page 28 of 67
Parks and Natural Heritage system Actions focus on: • operations and maintenance changes to identify and limit risks related to increasing temperature and severe weather • Exploring new technologies to improve water use and storage for landscaping needs Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Plan 18 Page 29 of 67
Facilities Actions focus on: • incorporating future climate projections into future cooling system upgrades and buildings retrofits • improving operation and maintenance procedures to identify and correct weather-related damage to facilities before major repairs are required Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Plan 19 Page 30 of 67
20Town of Aurora Climate Adaptat Wrap up Conclusions ion Plan No high risks have been identified for the Town’s infrastructure The Town has already completed some studies and started taking actions to reduce its infrastructure risk. The actions presented in the Adaptation Plan can further the resilience of the Town’s infrastructure when integrated into asset management processes. 20 Page 31 of 67
Thank you Lisa MacTavish Advisor, Climate Risk & Resilience Lisa.Mactavish@wsp.com Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Plan21 Page 32 of 67
22Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation PlanQuestions? Page 33 of 67
Appendix Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Plan23 Page 34 of 67
Climate Projections for Aurora 24 Town of Aurora Climate Adaptation Plan CLIMATE HAZARD CLIMATE INDICATOR Historical Baseline TREND 2050s Low winter temperature Mean January daily minimum temperature -12.1 °C È+3.0 qC High summer temperature Mean July daily maximum temperature + 26.1 °C Ç+2.3 qC Heat waves Number of heat waves (3 consecutive days above 30 ºC) 1.2 Ç+ 200% 5 Heating Degree Days (HDDs) HDDs 4296 È-14% 5 Cooling Degree Days (CDD) CDDs 217.2 Ç+ 86% 5 Freeze-thaw cycles Number of winter freeze-thaw cycles 31.0 Ç+18% 3 Short-duration precipitation 24-hr 1:100 precipitation 104.9 mm Ç+18% 5 Annual precipitation Annual precipitation 821 mm Ç+6% 2 Snow Maximum snow depth 70 cm È- 5% to 7.5% 5 Freezing rain Number of days with freezing rain events 3 – 7 Ç+ 10% to 18% 2 Wind Number of days with wind gusts > 100 km/h 5 Ç+ 30% 3 Lightning Annual number of lightning strikes 3,021 Ç+ 12% per qC of warming 4 Wildfire and smoke Mean annual area burnt in the Eastern temperate zone 0.04% Ç+ 50% 4 Probability score (1-7) 3 4 Page 35 of 67
100 John West Way
Aurora, Ontario
L4G 6J1
(905) 727-3123
aurora.ca
Town of Aurora
Memorandum
Planning and Development Services
Re: Community Improvement Plan Review Consultation
To: Environmental Advisory Committee
From: Nick Kazakoff, Economic Development Officer
Date: May 4, 2022
Recommendation
1. That the memorandum regarding Community Improvement Plan Review Consultation
be received; and
2. That the Environmental Advisory Committee comments regarding Community
Improvement Plan Review Consultation be received and referred to staff for
consideration and further action as appropriate.
Background
A Community Improvement Plans or CIP is a tool that allows a municipality to direct
funds and implement policy initiatives toward a specifically defined project
area. Section 28 of the Planning Act gives municipalities that have enabling policies in
their official plans, the ability to prepare a CIP. CIPs are intended to encourage
revitalization initiatives and/or stimulate development and redevelopment. Once
implemented, the Plan allows municipalities to provide tax assistance, grants or loans
to assist in the revitalization of lands and/or buildings within the defined CIP area.
Through Community Improvement Plans, municipalities can:
Focus public attention on local priorities and municipal initiatives;
Target areas in transition or in need of repair, revitalization and redevelopment;
Facilitate and encourage community change in a coordinated manner;
Stimulate private sector investment through municipal incentive-based
programs.
Page 36 of 67
Community Improvement Plan Review Consultation
May 4, 2022 Page 2 of 6
As part of an overall plan to revitalize the downtown area, the Town has designated the
Aurora Promenade as a CIP area. In 2014, a number of financial incentives were
developed to support the Aurora Promenade CIP to encourage long-term private sector
investment in new and existing development in the area. In 2019, the five-year CIP
expired, and due to the pandemic, consultation on an updated CIP was halted.
In September 2021, Council directed Staff to initiate an internal review of the Aurora
Promenade Community Improvement Plan, as directed in the current CIP plan, and is
intended to determine whether each program has met its goals (see Attachment 1).
The detailed internal review aims to evaluate and report back on several aspects
including:
The opportunities to improve effectiveness by determining which programs
should be eliminated, and which programs should be added or enhanced, that
align with the Official Plan and Promenade Secondary Plan;
The effectiveness of the funding and organizational structure of the CIP process;
The composition and operation of the Evaluation Committee;
The effectiveness of staff and other resources to administer, monitor and market
the programs;
The funding levels required to support the recommended programs.
As part of the review and public consultation process, staff are presenting a program
comparison of neighbouring municipalities as well as review and present best practices
and programs from across Ontario that are permitted under the Municipal Act and
Planning Act for a Community Improvement Plan. Special consideration has been given
to programs that align with the Town’s Strategic Plan and various Departmental plans
and objectives including: climate and environment, green development, downtown
revitalization, business support, heritage preservation, accessibility and public realm
amenities, along with managed growth in the Promenade. These various facets of
consideration have been grouped into four key areas: sustainability, heritage,
accessibility and affordable housing. (Note that “affordable” and “attainable” housing
terms have been used interchangeably, both relating to the ability of people to find
appropriate housing that meets their needs and budget.)
Page 37 of 67
Community Improvement Plan Review Consultation
May 4, 2022 Page 3 of 6
Analysis
Staff have conducted a best practices review of other communities across Ontario that
offer downtown Community Improvement Plans (see Attachment 2). The updated CIP
aims to address the following four priority areas: sustainability, heritage, accessibility,
and affordable housing. By reviewing these best practices staff have identified
elements that can be included into the Town’s original CIP Programs or even new
programs to be added to the next iteration of the Aurora Promenade CIP.
Accessibility Related Grants
A few of the Town’s neighbouring municipalities offer accessibility-related grants as an
eligible expense within their Building Restoration and Improvement Program. For
example, the Township of King offers the installation of automatic doors and
accessibility ramps as an eligible expense in their Property Improvement Grant.
Similarly, the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville offers eligible expenses for barrier free
entry under their Building, Façade and Signage Loan program. King’s maximum eligible
grant amount is $10,000 and Whitchurch-Stouffville is $15,000.
Another example is Kawartha Lake’s CIP that offers 50% eligible cost grants on
accessibility improvement projects, for a maximum of $4000, if they are in accordance
with the Ontario Disability Act Standards. Similarly for commercial units, the City of
Cambridge offers enhanced accessibility elements as an eligible expense under their
Building Restoration program and covers 50% of eligible costs.
The inclusion of accessibility improvement investments in the Aurora Promenade CIP
could be easily addressed by adding them as an eligible expense as part of the Building
Restoration, Renovation and Improvement Program similar to Whitchurch-Stouffville’s
CIP. As of right now, there is no reference to accessible improvements under the Aurora
Promenade CIP.
Sustainability Related Grants
Several municipalities near Aurora offer sustainability-related incentives in their tax-
increment based CIP programs. For example, the Township of King listed part of their
eligible expenses to their Tax Increment Equivalent Grant (TIEG) program that would
cover improvements to energy and water efficiency to buildings. Additionally, Bradford
offers part of their eligible expenses in their Tax-based Redevelopment Grant (TIG)
Page 38 of 67
Community Improvement Plan Review Consultation
May 4, 2022 Page 4 of 6
program could go towards costs associated with environmental contamination and
protection, or public infrastructure improvements like water services.
Another example, Middlesex County offers a unique sustainability-related incentive
program titled Energy Efficiency and Retrofit Grant which includes replacement of
windows and lighting with ENERGY STAR® models, implementation of a green roof with
vegetation, replacement hot water tanks/ systems with more energy efficient models,
and updating heating systems with ENERGY STAR® models under their eligible
expenses. This grant covers 50% of construction costs up to a total maximum amount
of $7,500. Lastly, on a broader scale, the City of Hamilton offers a sustainability grant
titled LEEDing The Way, which covers up to 75% of costs that are consistent with LEED
(Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification goals.
It is recommended that Aurora considers adding eligible expenses relating to
sustainability, such as water efficiency upgrades, to their existing Tax-based
Redevelopment Grant Program. This approach has been successfully demonstrated in
close-by and comparable municipalities such as King and Bradford. Additionally,
Middlesex county is a comparable municipality to Aurora and has taken the initiative to
offer an entirely separate CIP incentive that includes many important sustainability
improvements with a maximum eligible grant amount of $7,500. Therefore, Aurora may
consider adapting a similar program for the promenade CIP as it would greatly advance
sustainability efforts and be within an affordable budget range.
Heritage Related CIP Programs
Heritage related CIP programs are very common across many CIPs focused on
downtown revitalization and redevelopment including the Town’s neighbouring
municipalities. For example, Bradford offers heritage-related incentives, such as the
repairing and restoration of historic commercial facades in the eligible expenses under
their Façade, Landscape and Signage Improvement Grant (See Fig. 1). Additionally, the
Township of King offers heritage incentives, including the redevelopment of a non-
historic property or the re-purposing of an historic property, under their Tax Increment
Equivalent Grant (TIEG).
In addition, the City of Brampton offers extra grant amounts to developers under their
Building Improvement Program who specifically meet Ontario Heritage Act (OHA)
guidelines, up to a maximum of $50,000. The eligible expense for Brampton’s program
includes restoring architectural features, and/or interior works (i.e., woodwork, walls,
Page 39 of 67
Community Improvement Plan Review Consultation
May 4, 2022 Page 5 of 6
metal work) for the purposes of heritage preservation in non-residential and mixed use-
buildings.
In addition, to heritage grant-based CIP programs common among many municipalities,
the Aurora Promenade CIP offered a unique program titled the Heritage Property Tax
Relief Program which isn’t offered elsewhere. This program offered applicants 10-40%
reduction in municipal taxes for up to five years when improvement work to preserve,
restore and enhance historic character elements of heritage properties which are being
utilized for commercial enterprises was undertaken. Applicants of this program were
able to stack this program and be eligible for other grant programs within the Aurora
Promenade CIP program such as the Façade and Signage Program as well as Building
Restoration and Improvement Grant.
Aurora is already offering the Heritage Property Tax Relief Program; it may not be
necessary to introduce any additional heritage CIP grants. However, Aurora may want to
consider adding heritage-related restoration to their Façade & Signage Improvement
Grant Program or their Tax-based Redevelopment Grant Program, which is what has
been done in comparable neighboring municipalities such as Bradford and King.
Affordable Housing
Very few lower-tier municipalities offer affordable housing related CIP programs and not
one of the Town’s neighbouring municipalities offers an affordable housing program
component within their respective CIPs. Many of the affordable housing incentive
programs are delivered at the Regional level. For example, Northumberland County
offers grants and forgivable loans of $20,000 per affordable rental housing unit that is
built. Other larger single-tier municipalities such as the City of Hamilton and the City
Peterborough offer the waiving development charges and providing tax assistance for
affordable housing related developments.
The addition of an affordable housing financial component in the Aurora Promenade
CIP may be out of the scope as it would require significant cost analysis in order to
realize any benefit. However, non-financial incentives could be developed and offered
under a CIP. For instance, projects that offer an affordable or attainable housing
component might be eligible for a streamlined planning process, fee deferment plans, or
assistance with grant applications from the Region, Province or Federal granting levels.
Page 40 of 67
Community Improvement Plan Review Consultation
May 4, 2022 Page 6 of 6
Attachments
Attachment 1 – PDS21-108 – Aurora Promenade Community Improvement Plan
Attachment 2 – CIP Review - Best Practices Overview
Page 41 of 67
100 John West Way
Aurora, Ontario
L4G 6J1
(905) 727-3123
aurora.ca
Subject: Aurora Promenade Community Improvement Plan
Prepared by: Lisa Hausz, Manager, Economic Development and Policy
Department: Planning and Development Services
Date: September 21, 2021
Recommendation
1.That Report No. PDS21-108 be received; and,
2.That Council authorize staff to initiate the process to update the Aurora Promenade
Community Improvement Plan.
Executive Summary
This report seeks to inform Council of the 2014-2019 Community Improvement Plan
programs and uptake, obtain Council’s approval for staff to initiate the review of the CIP
including public consultation regarding a refresh of the Community Improvement Plan
for the Aurora Promenade.
•Uptake of the Community Improvement Plan During the Initial Five-Year Period
was limited to a few programs.
•The Development Charge Grant Program, Environmental Site Assessment Grant
Program, and the Environmental Remediation Tax Assistance Program Received
No Applications.
•The Façade and Signage Improvement Grant was the Most Popular Program
under the Community Improvement Plan.
•Community Improvement Plan Performance Program Evaluation to be
undertaken along with public consultation.
•Other Program Considerations are permitted within a Community Improvement
Plan.
Attachment 1
Town of Aurora
General Committee Report
No. PDS21-108
Page 42 of 67
September 21, 2021 2 of 8 Report No. PDS21-108
Background
In February 2014, Council approved a Community Improvement Plan for the Aurora
Promenade (the “CIP”), and in March 2014, the By-law implementing the CIP was
enacted. A CIP is intended to provide the Town with a flexible set of incentives in order
to stimulate private investment that will result in increased assessment, jobs and
managed population growth. A number of financial incentives were developed to
support the CIP to encourage long-term private sector investment in new and existing
development in the Promenade CIP area.
The Monitoring guidelines for the Aurora Promenade CIP indicate that a review of the
CIP would be undertaken in Year 5 (2019). An initial review of the CIP was prepared and
presented at an open house at the end of 2019, and intended for Council in 2020.
Due to the pandemic, the review was postponed and staff resources were allocated to
business support in partnership with the Aurora Chamber and York Region. Stakeholder
consultation was not feasible at the time. However, undertaking public consultation and
a review of the CIP is timely now because it is:
• a requirement for reactivating the 2014-2019 CIP; and,
• in line with the Official Plan Review, Promenade Secondary Plan review,
and the momentum being created by the Aurora Town Square
development.
An updated CIP is intended to leverage an updated Official Plan as well as incorporate
upcoming policies regarding the environment, heritage and accessibility. The review
will be undertaken in-house by Town staff lead by Planning and Development Services.
The following summarizes the general incentive programs offered by the Promenade
CIP Program of 2014-2019:
Façade and Signage Improvement Grant
• Matching grants were offered to eligible property owners for building facing and
exterior signage improvements or any combination of these two categories.
Building Restoration, Renovation and Improvement Program
• Promotes the use of second floors of existing commercial buildings, structural
enhancements and sustainability of older building stock.
Page 43 of 67
September 21, 2021 3 of 8 Report No. PDS21-108
Development Charge (DC) Grant Program
• Provides assistance towards the significant (re)development of key sites by
further reducing or eliminating the cost of development related to Development
Charges.
Tax-based Redevelopment Grant (TIG) Program
• Leverages the increased assessment and property taxation generated by the site
redevelopment to reduce the financial cost of property rehabilitation and
redevelopment by providing a grant equivalent to the municipal portion of the
property tax.
Heritage Property Tax Relief Program
• Provides under Section 365.2 of the Municipal Act, eligible heritage property
owners are able to receive a reduction in annual property taxes levied for
Municipal and Education purposes.
The programs listed above were in effect for an initial five-year period from the date the
By-law was enacted (March, 2014). In addition to general incentive programs, the Town
offered Brownfield redevelopment financial incentives for the CIP area, which included:
Environmental Site Assessment Grant Program
• Encourages redevelopment of Brownfield sites by providing private landowners
and developers of properties for which a Phase 1 ESA exists with further
assistance to specify the extent and nature of environmental contamination
through a Phase II ESA.
Environmental Remediation Tax Assistance Program
• Encourages redevelopment of sites which involve the remediation of
contaminated soil/buildings and/or other environmental risk management plans
eligible for assistance under Regulation. Offers cancellation of property tax
increases that result from the remediation and subsequent redevelopment of
contaminated sites.
In 2017, at the time of the Economic Development Reserve’s creation, Council approved
the closure and transfer of all unspent balances in Capital Project #81015: Community
Improvement Plan to this new reserve. This reserve has continued to fund both Aurora
Page 44 of 67
September 21, 2021 4 of 8 Report No. PDS21-108
Economic Development Corporation and CIP requirements since this time. The current
balance of the reserve is $412,800.
Analysis
Uptake of the Community Improvement Plan during the Initial Five-Year Period was
limited to a few programs
During the initial five-years of the Community Improvement Plan, Town Staff received
five CIP applications which were either approved in full or in part by Council. A total of
$85,000 was awarded to the applicants under the Façade and Signage Improvement
Program and the Building Restoration, Renovation and Improvement Program, however
three of the applicants’ funds have yet to be disbursed since the applicants have yet to
complete their respective projects.
In addition, the applicants for 95 Wellington St E and 15132 Yonge St were approved for
the Tax-based Redevelopment Grant program and the applicant for 46 Wellington St E
and 15032 Yonge St were approved for the Heritage Property Tax Relief program. Both
of these programs are based on the property owner/developer paying the full cost of
renovation, rehabilitation or redevelopment as well as the resulting annual increase in
property tax.
Completion of the project is then followed by the Town reimbursing the owner by way of
annual grant equivalent to the agreed municipal portion of the increment property tax
increase, over an established base assessment and tax liability. One of the associated
projects was recently completed, however at the time of this report the grant request is
under review and has not yet been issued.
The Façade and Signage Improvement Grant was the Most Popular Program
Community Improvement Plan
Of the seven programs offered in the Community Improvement Plan, the Façade and
Signage Improvement Grant has been the most popular program. Three applicants
applied for the program, each was granted the maximum $15,000 for a total of $45,000
awarded to applicants. To date, only two applicants have received the full disbursement
of funds. The other applicant has yet to complete their respective project. A summary of
funding awarded is shown in Table 1:
Page 45 of 67
September 21, 2021 5 of 8 Report No. PDS21-108
Table 1: Façade and Signage Improvement Grant Summary
Applicant
Total Amount of
Funds Awarded
Total Amount of
Funds Disbursed
Total Cost of
Façade and
Signage
Improvement
46 Wellington St E $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $34,300.00
14810 Yonge St $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $80,000.00
15132 Yonge St $15,000.00 Pending Approval $100,000.00
Total $45,000.00 $30,000.00 $214,300.00
The Development Charge Grant Program, Environmental Site Assessment Grant
Program, and the Environmental Remediation Tax Assistance Program Received No
Applications
Three out of the seven programs did not receive any applications over the initial five-
year period they included the Development Charge Grant Program, Environmental Site
Assessment Grant Program, and the Environmental Remediation Tax Assistance
Program. The reasons for not receiving applications to the programs include eligibility
for the program or little demand for the programs.
Community Improvement Plan Performance Program Evaluation to be undertaken
along with public consultation
The detailed internal review of the Aurora Promenade Community Improvement Plan, as
directed in the current CIP plan, is intended to determine whether each program has met
its goals. The review will evaluate:
• The opportunities to improve effectiveness by determining which programs
should be eliminated, and which programs should be added, that align with the
Official Plan and Promenade Secondary Plan;
• The effectiveness of the funding and organizational structure of the CIP process;
• The composition and operation of the Evaluation Committee;
• The effectiveness of staff and other resources to administer, monitor and market
the programs;
• The funding levels required to support the recommended programs.
Page 46 of 67
September 21, 2021 6 of 8 Report No. PDS21-108
Prior to the holding the statutory public meeting, staff will schedule an open house to
consult with stakeholders of the Aurora Promenade to gain insight and input on the
review of the previous programs and policies of the CIP, what new programs could be
introduced, and how they align with the vision of the Promenade Secondary Plan.
Following the open house, a statutory public meeting will be scheduled to present a
revised CIP for public review and comment in accordance with Section 17 of the
Planning Act.
Other program considerations are permitted within a Community Improvement Plan
Through the development of the 2014-2019 Community Improvement Plan, staff
reviewed neighbouring communities to gauge the programs and grant allocations.
Attachments 1 and 2 - Comparison of Neighbouring Municipalities offering CIP Grant
Programs and Comparison of CIP Façade and Signage Grant Funding outline the comparable
programs at the time.
The Town of Newmarket, City of Richmond Hill and King Township all offer CIP funding in
their respective downtown areas to support downtown revitalization. Some of the
municipalities offer an extensive list of grant programs while others offer a select number.
The two programs that are at the core of all CIP Programs similar to Aurora are the Façade
and Signage Improvement Grant Program and the Building Restoration, Renovation &
Improvement Grant Program. See Table 1 in Attachment 1 – Comparison of Neighbouring
Municipalities offering CIP Grant Programs, which provides a summary of the CIP programs
offered in the selected municipalities.
In 2019, staff conducted a review of the funding levels for the CIP programs across the
comparison municipalities. This analysis confirms that funding for the Aurora Promenade
CIP is comparable to the highlighted neighbouring municipalities. See Table 1 in Attachment
2 – Comparison of CIP Façade and Signage Grant Funding, which provides an example
comparison of the grant amounts in the four municipalities, which is a core program in all
four municipalities.
As part of the updating and public consultation process, staff will update the program
comparison of neighbouring municipalities as well as review and present best practices
and programs from across Ontario that are permitted under the Municipal Act for a
Community Improvement Plan. Special consideration will be identified for programs
that align with the Town’s Strategic Plan and various Departmental plans and objectives
including: downtown revitalization, business support, climate and environment, green
development, heritage preservation, accessibility and public realm amenities, along with
managed growth in the Promenade.
Page 47 of 67
September 21, 2021 7 of 8 Report No. PDS21-108
Advisory Committee Review
Advisory Committees and local boards including the Aurora Economic Development
Corporation, Aurora Business Improvement Association, and the Heritage, Environment
and Accessibility committees will be included as part of public consultation and
outreach.
Legal Considerations
If Council directs staff to update the Aurora Promenade Community Improvement Plan,
staff must consult with various prescribed public bodies and at least one public meeting
must be held to give the public an opportunity to make representations on the proposed
plan.
Financial Implications
There are no direct financial implications arising from this report.
Communications Considerations
Should Council approve moving forward for updating the Community Improvement Plan,
the Town will coordinate public engagement by way of a statutory public meeting as
well as other engagement methodologies to obtain meaningful feedback. The Town will
use “engage” as the level of engagement associated with this process and it will be
promoted by way of the Town’s website, social media, engagement platform, and by
way of the Council Highlights media release.
Link to Strategic Plan
The 2021 Community Improvement Plan for the Aurora Promenade supports many of
the Goals and Objectives of the Town’s Strategic Plan, the most relevant goals are:
Supporting an exception quality of life for all and enabling a diverse, creative and
resilient economy. The relevant supporting objectives include: Strengthening the fabric
of our community and promoting economic opportunities that facilitate growth of
Aurora as a desirable place to do business.
Alternative(s) to the Recommendation
1. That Council provide direction.
Page 48 of 67
September 21, 2021 8 of 8 Report No. PDS21-108
Conclusions
Staff recommend that Council direct staff to commence a review of the initial five-year
Aurora Promenade CIP’s programs and policies based on a comprehensive evaluation
of the previous programs supplemented by public consultation. Staff will report back to
Council on the findings of the public consultation to a future General Committee
meeting following the statutory public meeting.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Comparison of Neighbouring Municipalities offering CIP Grant Programs
Attachment 2 - Comparison of CIP Façade and Signage Grant Funding
Previous Reports
None
Pre-submission Review
Agenda Management Team review on September 2, 2021
Approvals
Approved by David Waters, MCIP, RPP, PLE, Director, Planning and Development
Services
Approved by Doug Nadorozny, Chief Administrative Officer
Page 49 of 67
TOWN OF AURORA, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENTPromenade Area Community Improvement Plan (CIP)Best Practices Overview Attachment 2Page 50 of 67
•Sustainability •Heritage•Accessibility•Affordable HousingSeeking Input: Four ‘Bucket’ IncentivesTOWN OF AURORA, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENTThe Town of Aurora is looking to review each of our 7 CIP programs with the following (4) themes that are in line with the official plan: Page 51 of 67
TOWN OF AURORA, PROMENADE AREA CIP1. Façade Grant ProgramMunicipalityAuroraKingRichmond HillNewmarketWhitchurch-Stouffville BradfordGrantFaçade & Signage Improvement Grant ProgramFaçade and Signage Improvement GrantFaçade and Signage Improvement GrantFaçade Improvement & Restoration ProgramBuilding, façade and Signage LoanFaçade, Landscape and Signage Improvement GrantAllocated Amount (%)50% of eligible costs50% of eligible costs50% of eligible costs50% of eligible costsMatching amount spent by proponent50% of eligible costsMaximum Amount$15,000 Varies$15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $25,000 Eligible ExpensesReplacement of doors, windows, façades & signage Signage & façade improvement architectural servicesBuilding façades, front/side lot landscaping, signage Repainting masonry/ brickwork redesign of storefronts, window repairUpgrading buildings to comply with the OBC, canopies, building signage,barrier-free entriesRoof repair, historic restoration, exterior window treatment, signageFaçade CIP Comparison: Neighbouring Municipalities Page 52 of 67
1. Façade Grant ProgramOverview: •Aurora’sFaçade program is very comparable in terms of grant amounts, maximum amounts, and eligible expense criteriato neighbouring municipalities.Suggestions: •To address our four key themes, heritage-relatedcriteria could be written as an additional eligible expense (i.e. Bradford offers historic restoration in their eligible expenses).•Better use of language to incorporate one or more key themes.Page 53 of 67
2. Building Renovation & RestorationMunicipalityAuroraKingRichmond HillNewmarketWhitchurch-Stouffville BradfordGrantBuilding Restoration, Renovation and Improvement ProgramProperty Improvement GrantBuilding Renovation GrantInterior Renovation & Improvement ProgramBuilding, façade and Signage LoanBuilding Restoration, Renovation, and Improvement Program Allocated Amount (%)50% of eligible costs50% of eligible costs50% of eligible costs50% of eligible costsMatching amount spent by proponent50% of eligible costsMaximum Amount$40,000 $10,000$50,000 $15,000 / loan of $100,000$15,000 $50,000 Eligible ExpensesBuilding, fire and other code compliance, expansion/additions, general Automatic doors, accessibility ramps, building/ fire code compliance, Materials, labor,professional fees, building/ fire code compliance, structural Structural, leasehold and fixed improvementsThe conversion of the upper storey commercial buildings to residential use/ offices, barrier free entry, building/ fire Building/ fire code compliance, expansion/additions, retrofitting existing space, additional on-site Building Renovation & RestorationComparison: Neighbouring Municipalities TOWN OF AURORA, PROMENADE AREA CIPPage 54 of 67
2. Building Renovation & RestorationOverview: •Aurora’sBuilding Renovation program is very comparable in terms of grant amounts to neighbouring municipalities.•Maximum amounts/ eligible expense criteria varies slightly. Suggestions: •Express better language to promote sustainability and accessibility-related incentives in the eligible expense criteria section. •Sustainability-related incentive examples: green roofs, updated heating systems, lighting and window replacements, etc.•Accessibility: barrier free entry, accessibility ramps, etc. Page 55 of 67
TOWN OF AURORA, PROMENADE AREA CIP3. Development Charge Grant Program MunicipalityAuroraKingRichmond HillNewmarketWhitchurch-Stouffville BradfordGrantDevelopment Charge (DC) Grant ProgramN/AN/ADevelopment Charges Rebate/Credit ProgramN/AThe Development Charge (DC) Grant ProgramAllocated Amount (%)75% of the Development ChargeN/AN/ATBD based on project/ meritN/A50% DC reductionMaximum Amount$100,000N/AN/ATBD based on project/ meritN/AMax. 50%Eligible ExpensesOnly applicable to commercial developments/ projectsN/AN/ANew construction, building preservation, restoration of heritage, residential intensificationN/AAssistance for the development& redevelopment of sitesDevelopment Charge Grant Program ComparisonPage 56 of 67
3. Development Charge Grant Program Overview: •The Development Charge Grant Program offered in Aurora is somewhat comparable to its neighboring municipalities. •Newmarket and Bradford offer a DC grant similar in description title to Aurora’s, but allocated amounts and maximum time frames are not specified in Newmarket.Suggestions:•To include both affordable housing & heritage-related incentives under their eligible expenses criteria. •Allowing multi-unit (rather than only commercial) projects to advance affordable housing development possibilities Page 57 of 67
TOWN OF AURORA, PROMENADE AREA CIP4. Tax-Based Increment Program MunicipalityAuroraKingRichmond HillNewmarketWhitchurch-Stouffville BradfordGrantTax-based Redevelopment Grant ProgramTax increment equivalent grantTaxIncrementEquivalent Grant (TIEG)Redevelopment & Rehabilitation Tax Incentive ProgramRedevelopment/Rehabilitation Grant ProgramTax-based Redevelopment Grant (TIG) ProgramAllocated Amount (%)80% for non residential, 100% for multi-unit residentialGrant provided on a declining rate basisGrant provided on a declining rate basisAnnual grant based on tax increase the property will experienceGrant provided on a declining rate basis100% of annual taxMaximum Amount10 year periodUp to 100% over a 10 year period.90% of the annual tax increment.Max 10 years.10 year periodYear 1-80% property tax bill, Year 10-owner pays full10 year periodEligible ExpensesSite development and infrastructurework including demolition & building h bilit tiRe-purposing of an historic property, improvements to energy/ water efficiencyDevelopment of office use (stand-alone or as part of mixed usedevelopments) across the entire CIPA.Redevelopment of propertiesRedevelopment and rehabilitation of sites as deemedappropriate by the TownBuilding rehabilitation,environmentalprotection,public infrastructure (water services)Tax-based Increment Program ComparsionPage 58 of 67
Overview: •The Taxed-Based Increment Program offered is very comparable.•Most municipalities offer a reduction in taxes on a declining basis throughout 10 years or less, until finally reaching a 100% reduction by the 10th year. 4. Tax-Based Increment Program Suggestions:•Aurora should consider expressing affordable housing & sustainability-related incentives to its eligible criteria for this program. •Affording housing incentives would fit well into this program because it is already related to site development and multi-unit residential buildings.Page 59 of 67
TOWN OF AURORA, PROMENADE AREA CIP5. Heritage Property Tax ProgramMunicipalityAuroraKingRichmond HillNewmarketWhitchurch-Stouffville BradfordGrantHeritage Property Tax Relief ProgramN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AAllocated Amount (%)10-40% reduction of taxesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AMaximum AmountUp to 5 yearsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AEligible ExpensesImprovement work to preserve, restore andenhance historic character/elements of Heritage Properties whichare being utilized for il t iN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AHeritage Grant Program Comparison Page 60 of 67
Overview: •The Heritage Property Tax Program is very unique to Aurora and not offered in other neighbouring municipalities. •This incentive can only be applied to a development in conjunction with applications under programs 1 and 2 (façade & building restoration).Suggestions:•Aurora is already exceeding other municipalities in terms of heritage-related incentives through this program. 5. Heritage Property Tax Relief ProgramPage 61 of 67
TOWN OF AURORA, PROMENADE AREA CIP6. Environmental Site Assessment ProgramMunicipalityAuroraKingRichmond HillNewmarketWhitchurch-Stouffville BradfordGrantEnvironmental Site Assessment ProgramN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AAllocated Amount (%)Matching financial assistance / deferring property tax increasesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AMaximum AmountN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AEligible ExpensesBrownfield redevelopment (Phase II ESA RemedialAction Plans)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AEnvironmental Site Assessment Program ComparisonPage 62 of 67
6. Environmental Site Assessment ProgramOverview:•Similar to the Heritage program, the Environmental Site Assessment Program is unique and specific to Aurora.•This program specifically targets brownfield development that has been an issue in this area of Aurora’s downtown district.Suggestions:•Aurora should reassess the need for this incentive moving forward.Page 63 of 67
TOWN OF AURORA, PROMENADE AREA CIP7. Environmental Remediation Tax Assistance Program MunicipalityAuroraKingRichmond HillNewmarketWhitchurch-Stouffville BradfordGrantEnvironmentalRemediation TaxAssistance ProgramN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AAllocated Amount (%)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AMaximum AmountN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AEligible ExpensesPhase II environmentalsite assessments, risk assessments andrisk management plans.N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AEnvironmental Remediation Tax Assistance Program Comparison Page 64 of 67
7. Environmental Remediation Tax Assistance ProgramOverview:• Aurora’s neighboring municipalities do not offer a comparable environmental tax remediation program.•This is site specific to address needs to large Brownfield sites.Suggestions:Review the various site-specific needs within the town and determine if this program is still feasible.Page 65 of 67
TOWN OF AURORA, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENTNext Steps•Continue with Advisory Committee consultations •Public Session with Council in June 2022•Assess and implement feedback •Conduct program analysis•Conduct cost/benefit analysis•Report back to Council in 2023Page 66 of 67
Environmental Advisory Committee Update List – as of April 2022
This list provides an update to items which were brought to the Environmental Advisory
Committee (EAC) for comment under “Items for Consideration”. Committee contributions can
be found in the meeting minutes and the “Advisory Committee Review” section of General
Committee (GC)/Council reports.
This list will be updated and provided at regular bi-monthly scheduled meetings. Completed
items will be removed from subsequent updates.
Agendas, reports, and minutes can be found at www.aurora.ca/agendas.
2021 EAC Items
Meeting Date Item Status/Update
February 24, 2021
(minutes)
Round Table Discussion; Re:
Private Tree Protection By-law
No. 5850-16 (deferred from Jan.
25)
Ongoing
Tree by-law update pending.
November 24, 2021
(minutes)
Memorandum from Senior Policy
Planner; Re: Green Development
Standards Consultation
Completed
Update provided to EAC on Feb
23, 2022.
Memorandum from Manager of
Economic Development and
Policy; Re: Streetscape Needs
Assessment
Ongoing
Consultation and assessment
ongoing; details to be provided
when available.
2022 EAC Items
Meeting Date Item Status/Update
February 23, 2022
(minutes)
Memorandum from Senior Policy
Planner; Re: Green Development
Standards Update - Phase 1
Planned Implementation
Ongoing
Consultation ongoing; details to
be provided when available.
Memorandum from Energy and
Climate Change Analyst; Re: Anti-
Idling Policy Update
Completed
Staff report with EAC comments
considered by GC on Apr 5, 2022;
staff recommendation endorsed
by Council on Apr 26, 2022.
Page 67 of 67