Loading...
Minutes - Aurora Appeal Tribunal - 20211028 1 Town of Aurora Aurora Appeal Tribunal Hearing Minutes Date: Time: Location: Thursday, October 28, 2021 6:00 p.m. Video Conference Committee Members: Tom Plamondon (Chair) Daniel Lajeunesse Steven D'Angeli Linda Duringer David Mhango Other Attendees: Alexander Wray, Manager, By-law Services Lindsay Clarke, Supervisor, Animal Services Kayla Recker, Animal Services Officer (Town Case Presenter) Samantha Yew, Deputy Town Clerk Irena Polonsky, Witness Farahnaz Wardak, Appellant _____________________________________________________________________ 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 6:03 p.m. 2. Procedural Notes This meeting will be held electronically as per Section 19. i) of the Town's Procedure By-law No. 6228-19, as amended, due to the COVID-19 situation. 3. Approval of the Agenda Moved By Linda Duringer Seconded By Steven D'Angeli That the agenda circulated by Legislative Services be approved. 2 Carried 4. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof There were no declarations of pecuniary interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M.50. 5. Appeals for Consideration 5.1 177 Orchard Heights Boulevard – Muzzle Order – Animal Services By-law No. 6197-19 The Chair called the meeting to order and provided an overview of the Hearing procedures. The Town requested that the Notice to Muzzle for the Appellant's dog Teardrop be confirmed as written. The Appellant asked that the Order be rescinded. Kayla Recker, the Town's Case Presenter, presented exhibits supporting the alleged dog bite caused by Teardrop on July 30, 2021, including witness statements and photographs. Officer Recker called on Irena Polonsky, owner of Honey, the dog who sustained a puncture wound during the incident. Ms. Polonsky provided her account of the incident and discussed details of her witness statement that was submitted as part of the Town's evidence. The Tribunal members also asked questions of the witness to clarify the details of the incident. The Town noted that a photo of injuries allegedly sustained by Teardrop was omitted from their package as it is was provided after the incident and unclear when the photo was taken. The Town objected to the submission of the photo of evidence. The Appellant provided her account of the incident and submitted photos and testimonials to support Teardrop's good behavior. The Tribunal asked the Appellant questions about the incident and Teardrop. The Tribunal discussed the incident and inquired about the exhibits entered into evidence. The Tribunal recessed the Hearing to deliberate at 8:18 p.m. and reconvened the Hearing at 8:59 p.m. With respect to the Town’s objection to the admissibility of evidence (photo of the leg of Teardrop), the Tribunal denied the Town's objection. 3 The Tribunal further noted that based on the weight of the evidence, their findings were consistent with the Town's position that Teardrop was the aggressor in a dog-on-dog interaction that resulted in a bite that punctured the skin of Honey. Decision 1. That the muzzle order for Teardrop be upheld as issued to the dog's owner Heshmat Rasouli, subject to the following and satisfaction of the Town of Aurora: 1. Submission of a documented opinion from a professional dog trainer of the Town’s approval that Teardrop does not show any aggressive tendencies 2. That, at the point of satisfying this requirement, and no sooner than 18 months from the date of issuance of the muzzle order, we rescind the muzzle order. 6. Adjournment Moved By Daniel Lajeunesse Seconded By Linda Duringer That the hearing be adjourned at 9:09 p.m. Carried