AGENDA - Heritage Advisory Committee - 20180611Heritage
Advisory Committee
Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
7 p.m.
Holland Room
Aurora Town Hall
Public Release
June 4, 2018
Town of Aurora
Heritage Advisory Committee
Meeting Agenda
Date: Monday, June 11, 2018
Time and Location: 7 p.m., Holland Room, Aurora Town Hall
1. Approval of the Agenda
Recommended:
That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services be approved.
2. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
3. Receipt of the Minutes
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of May 14, 2018
Recommended:
That the Heritage Advisory Committee meeting minutes of May 14, 2018, be
received for information.
4. Delegations
5. Matters for Consideration
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018 Page 2 of 3
1. HAC18-010 – Heritage Permit Application
60 Fleury Street
File: NE-HCD-HPA-18-05
Recommended:
1. That Report No. HAC18-010 be received; and
2. That the Heritage Advisory Committee recommend to Council:
(a) That Heritage Permit Application NE-HCD-HPA-18-05 be approved to
permit the construction of an expanded side gable and construction of a
side dormer as shown on the submitted plans.
2. Memorandum from Manager of Parks and Fleet
Re: Tree Removal Permit Application – 61 Spruce Street
Recommended:
1. That the memorandum regarding Tree Removal Permit Application for 61
Spruce Street be received; and
2. That the Heritage Advisory Committee provide comment with respect the
proposed Tree Removal Permit Application for 61 Spruce Street; and
3. That the Heritage Advisory Committee provide direction to Council.
6. Informational Items
3. Extract from Council Meeting of May 8, 2018
Re: Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of April 9, 2018
and Summary of Committee Recommendations Report No. 2018-05
Recommended:
1. That the Extract from Council meeting of May 8, 2018, regarding the
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of April 9, 2018, and
Summary of Committee Recommendations Report No. 2018-05 be
received for information.
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018 Page 3 of 3
7. New Business
8. Adjournment
Town of Aurora
Heritage Advisory Committee
Meeting Minutes
Date: Monday, May 14, 2018
Time and Location: 7 p.m., Holland Room, Aurora Town Hall
Committee Members: Councillor Wendy Gaertner (Chair), Councillor Jeff Thom
(Vice Chair), Bob McRoberts (Honorary Member), Neil
Asselin, Barry Bridgeford, John Kazilis, Martin Paivio, and
Ken Turriff
Members Absent: James Hoyes
Other Attendees: Councillor Tom Mrakas, Councillor Michael Thompson,
Marco Ramunno, Director of Planning and Development
Services, Jeff Healey, Planner/Heritage Planning, and Linda
Bottos, Council/Committee Secretary
The Chair called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
1. Approval of the Agenda
Moved by Ken Turriff
Seconded by Councillor Thom
That the agenda as circulated by Legislative Services, with the following additions,
be approved:
• Delegation (a) Bob Murphy and Gavin Bailey, representing Aurora United
Church and Southbound Developments; Re: Item 1 – HAC18-009 – Aurora
United Church – Site Plan Review, 15186 Yonge Street, 12 and 16 Tyler
Street, 55 ad 57 Temperance Street
• Delegation (b) William Albino, Resident; Re: Item 2 – HAC18-008 – Yonge
Street Building Evaluations
On a two-thirds vote the motion
Carried as amended
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Minutes
Page 1 of 8
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
Monday, May 14, 2018 Page 2 of 8
2. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
Bob McRoberts declared a potential pecuniary interest under the Municipal
Conflict of Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M.50 respecting Item 1 – HAC18-009 –
Aurora United Church – Site Plan Review, 15186 Yonge Street, 12 and 16 Tyler
Street, 55 and 57 Temperance Street, as he is a financial supporter and member
of the Aurora United Church. Mr. McRoberts did not participate in the discussion
or voting of this item.
3. Receipt of the Minutes
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of April 9, 2018
Moved b y Neil Asselin
Seconded by Bob McRoberts
That the Heritage Advisory Committee meeting minutes of April 9, 2018, be
received for information.
Carried
4. Delegations
(a) Bob Murphy and Gavin Bailey, representing Aurora United Church and
Southbound Developments
Re: Item 1 – HAC18-009 – Aurora United Church – Site Plan Review,
15186 Yonge Street, 12 and 16 Tyler Street, 55 and 57 Temperance
Street
Mr. Murphy, Architect, and Mr. Bailey, of Fotenn Consultants Inc., provided an
overview of the efforts to adapt the streetscape along Temperance and Tyler
Streets to bring the development more in line with the residential scale and
character of the neighbourhood, the incorporation of artefacts retrieved from
the heritage houses, and discussions with the ratepayers association.
Moved by Martin Paivio
Seconded by Barry Bridgeford
That the comments of the delegation be received and referred to Item 1.
Carried
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Minutes
Page 2 of 8
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
Monday, May 14, 2018 Page 3 of 8
(b) William Albino, Resident
Re: Item 2 – HAC18-008 – Yonge Street Building Evaluations
Mr. Albino expressed concerns regarding the Town’s ability to provide heritage
protection, emphasizing the need to protect the downtown heritage block, and
encouraged the Heritage Advisory Committee to provide strong support in the
protection of heritage properties.
Moved by Councillor Thom
Seconded by Ken Turriff
That the comments of the delegation be received and referred to Item 2.
Carried
5. Matters for Consideration
1. HAC18-009 – Aurora United Church – Site Plan Review, 15186 Yonge
Street, 12 and 16 Tyler Street, 55 and 57 Temperance Street
Staff provided a brief overview of the report and changes to the proposal. The
Committee expressed concern regarding the blank wall on the north elevation,
and staff provided clarification on window placement as directed by the
Building Code. The Committee expressed further concern regarding the three
large, square expanses of white surface area on the wall, and suggested
alternatives. Staff agreed to address the Committee’s comments with the
architect.
Moved by Neil Asselin
Seconded by Martin Paivio
1. That Report No. HAC18-009 be received; and
2. That the Heritage Advisory Committee recommend to Council:
(a) That the use of stucco be avoided and that the large white surface
areas be addressed.
Carried
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Minutes
Page 3 of 8
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
Monday, May 14, 2018 Page 4 of 8
6. Informational Items
2. HAC18-008 – Yonge Street Building Evaluations
The Committee consented to consider Item 2 prior to consideration of Item 1.
Staff provided background and a brief overview of the report. The Committee
and staff discussed various aspects of the objective evaluations, designation
process, public notice, and timelines.
Moved by Bob McRoberts
Seconded by Martin Paivio
1. That Report No. HAC18-008 be received; and
2. That the Heritage Advisory Committee recommend to Council:
(a) That the following properties be designated under Part IV of the
Ontario Heritage Act:
(i) 15243B Yonge Street; "Whimster's Store";
(ii) 15243A Yonge Street; "Mulock Block";
(iii) 15242 Yonge Street; "The Lloyd Building";
(iv) 15240 Yonge Street; "The Ashton Building";
(v) 15233 Yonge Street; "Medical Hall";
(vi) 15229 Yonge Street; "The Willis Building";
(vii) 15225 Yonge Street; "Winter's Bakery";
(viii) 15222, 15224 and 15226 Yonge Street; "The Faughner Building";
(ix) 15221 Yonge Street; "Sterling Bank";
(x) 15218-15220 Yonge Street; "The Clift Building";
(xi) 15216 Yonge Street; "The Odd Fellows Block";
(xii) 15210 Yonge Street; "The Andrews Block";
(xiii) 15203 Yonge Street; "The Butcher Building";
(xiv) 15199 Yonge Street; "The Grimshaw Bakery"; and
(xv) 15195 Yonge Street.
Carried as amended
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Minutes
Page 4 of 8
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
Monday, May 14, 2018 Page 5 of 8
3. Memorandum from Planner/Heritage Planning
Re: 32 Wellington Street East
Staff provided a brief overview of the memorandum and alterations occurring
on the property. The Committee and staff discussed various aspects of the
reconstruction and drawings, and the Committee expressed further concern
regarding the builder’s continued noncompliance with the approved building
permit drawings. The Committee inquired about the approval and oversight
process, and staff provided clarification, noting that the guidelines will be
included on a future Committee agenda.
Moved by Ken Turriff
Seconded by Neil Asselin
1. That the memorandum regarding 32 Wellington Street East be received;
and
2. That the Heritage Advisory Committee recommend to Council:
(a) That this item be referred to the Town’s Legal staff for affirmation that
the builder has not complied with Council’s approval related to the
development at 32 Wellington Street East, and to provide options for
next steps.
Carried as amended
4. Memorandum from Senior Policy Planner
Re: Library Square Design
Staff provided a brief overview of the memorandum. The Committee inquired
about the new community facility and emergency vehicle access, and staff
provided clarification.
Moved by Bob McRoberts
Seconded by Martin Paivio
1. That the memorandum regarding Library Square Design be received for
information.
Carried
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Minutes
Page 5 of 8
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
Monday, May 14, 2018 Page 6 of 8
5. Memorandum from Planner/Heritage Planning
Re: Doors Open Aurora 2018 Update
Staff provided a brief overview of the memorandum. The Committee inquired
about the policy respecting the inclusion of properties that operate as a
business, and staff provided clarification.
Moved by Bob McRoberts
Seconded by Martin Paivio
1. That the memorandum regarding Doors Open Aurora 2018 Update be
received for information.
Carried
6. Extract from Council Meeting of April 10, 2018
Re: Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of March 5, 2018
and Summary of Committee Recommendations Report No. 2018-04
Moved by Bob McRoberts
Seconded by Martin Paivio
1. That the Extract from Council meeting of April 10, 2018, regarding the
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of March 5, 2018, and
Summary of Committee Recommendations Report No. 2018-04, be
received for information.
Carried
7. New Business
Staff provided an update regarding Monk’s Walk.
Staff provided an update regarding the railway station, railway hotel, and Metrolinx
expansion project, noting that the railway station holds a Part III (i) designation
under the Ontario Heritage Act and has been identified as a provincially significant
property. The Committee inquired about the railway hotel and Baldwin’s property,
and staff provided background and confirmed that they are both listed heritage
properties. The Committee expressed a desire to begin the designation and
evaluation process for the properties. It was noted that an update from Metrolinx
would soon be provided to the Town.
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Minutes
Page 6 of 8
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
Monday, May 14, 2018 Page 7 of 8
Moved by Bob McRoberts
Seconded by Neil Asselin
1.That the Heritage Advisory Committee recommend to Council:
(a)That the Evaluation Working Group provide an objective evaluation
on each of the following properties:
(i)136 Wellington Street East; "Railroad Hotel"; and
(ii)124 Wellington Street East; "Baldwin’s Restaurant"; and
(b)That the objective evaluations be submitted to the Heritage Advisory
Committee meeting of July 9, 2018, for further review.
Carried
Staff advised that locations would need to be identified for installation of road-side
signage indicating entrances to any heritage conservation district in Town, and the
matter will be submitted to the Committee for consideration at a future meeting.
The Committee noted that the Prince of Wales award plaque located at the front of
Town Hall needs to be refreshed, and staff agreed to follow up with Operations
staff.
The Committee observed that the commemorative plaque has been placed directly
on the light armoured vehicle (LAV) located at the Aurora Cenotaph site, noting
that signage is not usually attached directly to an artefact.
The Committee noted that the plaque at the former Aurora Armoury location
requires updating and a number of other plaques in Town need to be repaired or
refreshed. Staff agreed to follow up on the matter.
Staff announced that Jeff Healey, Planner/Heritage Planning, will be leaving
Aurora on May 25 as he has accepted a position as Senior Planner with the Town
of Richmond Hill. Mr. Healey expressed his appreciation of working with the
Committee members and for their efforts, and the Committee congratulated Mr.
Healey on his new position.
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Minutes
Page 7 of 8
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
Monday, May 14, 2018 Page 8 of 8
8. Adjournment
Moved by John Kazilis
Seconded by Barry Bridgeford
That the meeting be adjourned at 10:53 p.m.
Carried
Committee recommendations are not binding on the Town unless adopted by Council.
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Minutes
Page 8 of 8
Town of Aurora Heritage Advisory Committee Report No.HAC18-010
Subject: Heritage Permit Application
60 Fleury Street
File: NE-HCD-HPA-18-05
Prepared by: Jeff Healey, Planner/ Heritage Planning
Department: Planning and Development Services
Date: June 11, 2018
Recommendation
1.That Report No. HAC18-010 be received; and
2.That the Heritage Advisory Committee recommend to Council:
a)That Heritage Permit Application NE-HCD-HPA-18-05 be approved to
permit the construction of an expanded side gable and construction
of a side dormer as shown on the submitted plans.
Executive Summary
The purpose of this report is to provide Council with direction from the Heritage Advisory
Committee regarding Heritage Permit Application NE-HCD-HPA-18-05 regarding the
expansion of an existing side gable on the north (side) elevation and construction of a
new dormer on the north (side) elevation located at 60 Fleury Street, designated under
Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act as part of the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage
Conservation District.
•The house on the subject lands was constructed circa 1922 and is commonly
known as the Jenkins’ House.
•The proposal is found to be in keeping with the policies of the Northeast Old
Aurora Heritage Conservation District Plan.
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 1
Page 1 of 12
June 11, 2018 - 2 - Report No. HAC18-010
Background
The agent on behalf of the owner of the property located at 60 Fleury Street submitted
Heritage Permit Application NE-HCD-HPA-18-05 on April 26, 2018. The house can be
described as a two and a half storey, designed in an Edwardian Foursquare
architectural style.
The subject property was designated in 2006 under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act
as part of the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District. Section 42 of the Act
states that,
No owner of property situated in a heritage conservation district that has
been designated by a municipality under this Part shall do any of the
following, unless the owner obtains a permit from the municipality to do
so: “1. Alter, or permit the alteration of, any part of the property, other
than the interior of any structure or building on the property; 2. Erect,
demolish or remove any building or structure on the property or permit
the erection, demolition or removal of such a building or structure.
The Heritage Permit Application was deemed complete by staff on April 30, 2018.
Council has 90 days to respond to the Application or else the Application is
automatically approved.
Location
The subject property is located on the west side of Fleury Street, midblock between
Catherine Avenue and Maple Street (See Attachment 1).
Heritage Features of the Existing Building
The existing building can be described as a 2 ½ storey structure with a front gable roof.
Overall, the building is a classic example of an Edwardian (Foursquare) architectural
style and is considered a contributing building within the Heritage Conservation District.
The façade displays a wrap-around front porch, supported by four wood columns on
stone-capped brick piers. The building predominantly features 1 over 1 sash windows in
a traditional 2 to 1 proportion. A single paned box window is featured on the north
elevation. The original building is clad in red brick, a rear addition and a front facing
mudroom are clad in wood board and batten.
Analysis
On April 30 2018, staff issued a Notice of Receipt on behalf of Council as per By-law
5365-11 (being a By-law to delegate certain assigned Council authority under the
Ontario Heritage Act regarding the power to consent to alterations of designated
heritage properties).
According to the Plan for the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District, “No.
60 [Fleury Street] has the full width front gable of Edwardian Classicism.”
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 1
Page 2 of 12
June 11, 2018 - 3 - Report No. HAC18-010
Proposed Concept Plan
The agent on behalf of the owner proposes to remove the existing side gable located at
the northwest corner of the original home. A new side gable is proposed in its place,
which will extend 1.2 metres (4 feet) higher than the existing gable. The altered side
gable will measure approximately 15.8 m2 larger than the previous side gable. The
height has been extended to match the existing main ridge of the original structure. This
side gable is intended to retain the roofline of the existing dormer. Building materials for
the side gable are to include board and batten wood siding and cedar shakes. The
cedar shakes are consistent material to the existing side gable. A new window is
proposed, and will incorporate a 1 over 1 sash window, consistent with the rest to the
structure.
A new dormer is also proposed on the north elevation, located east of the proposed side
gable, closer to the front elevation. This dormer is proposed above the roofline,
measured at 1.2 metres (4 feet) in width. The dormer will measure approximately 2.8 m2
in area. The agent has requested the dormer in order to provide additional headroom for
a staircase located directly below the proposed dormer. Building materials for the
dormer are to include board and batten wood siding and cedar shakes. A new window is
proposed, which will incorporate a 1 over 1 sash box window
Since the house is designated under Part V of the Act any additions or alterations
should be in compliance with the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District
Plan (the Plan). Several policies were considered in reviewing the Application.
Section 4.3.2 addresses alterations and additions to existing Heritage Buildings. The
proposed works will conserve the heritage character of the existing building. It is noted
that should the side gable be removed in the future, it will be impossible to recover the
original side gable roofline.
Section 9.2.5 of the District Plan addresses windows. The agent is proposing 1 over 1
sash windows to fit proportionately within the proposed dormers. The proposed
windows are in keeping with the District Plan.
Section 9.2.7 of the Plan speaks to Dormers. The Plan states that “Care should be
taken to use window shapes and glazing appropriate to the architectural style”. The
proposed dormer measures 2.3 metres x 1.2 metres. The new dormer is proposed to be
cladded in wood board and batten and cedar shakes, which is consistent with the gable
rooflines on the building. The location of the proposed dormer is appropriate provided
that it is a minor architectural addition to the home and is consistent with dormers of
Edwardian Architectural Style. Although in view of the street, the dormer will not
negatively impact the heritage character of the home and is considered an appropriate
placement to the home. The dormer could easily be removed should a future owner
determine to remove this architectural feature.
Section 9.3.6 of the Plan speaks to appropriate siting and placement of additions/
alterations. The alteration is consistent with the architectural style of the home. The
agent is utilizing building materials which are appropriate to the District Plan. The height
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 1
Page 3 of 12
June 11, 2018 -4 -Report No. HAC18-010
of the side gable will match the height of the front gable, which remains appropriate to
the Edwardian Architectural style. The alteration keeps the building within the scale of
the Heritage Conservation District Plan.
Design Review Panel
Not required.
Financial Implications
There are no financial implications.
Communications Considerations
No Communication Required.
Link to Strategic Plan
The conservation of heritage resources supports the Strategic Plan goal of Supporting
an Exceptional Quality of Life for All through its accomplishment in satisfying
requirements in objective Celebrating and Promoting our Culture.
Alternatives to the Recommendation
None.
Conclusions
It is recommended that Heritage Application Permit located at 60 Fleury Street be
approved, for the alteration of the existing side gable and the construction of a dormer
on the side (north) elevation. The works will not negatively impact the heritage character
of the building. Building materials utilized will be in keeping with the home and the
Heritage Conservation District Plan. It is noted that should the altered side gable be
removed in the future, it will be impossible to recover the original side gable roofline.
Once a Heritage Permit Application is received, Council has ninety (90) days from the
date of issuing a Notice of Receipt to: consent to the application with or without terms
and conditions, or refuse the application.
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 1
Page 4 of 12
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 1 Page 5 of 12
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 1 Page 6 of 12
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 1 Page 7 of 12
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 1 Page 8 of 12
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 1 Page 9 of 12
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 1 Page 10 of 12
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 1 Page 11 of 12
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 1 Page 12 of 12
Memorandum
Date: June 11, 2018
To: Heritage Advisory Committee
From: Sara Tienkamp, Manager of Parks and Fleet
Copy: Marco Ramunno, Director of Planning and Development Services
Re: Tree Removal Permit Application – 61 Spruce Street
Recommendation
1.That the memorandum regarding Tree Removal Permit Application for 61
Spruce Street be received; and
2.That the Heritage Advisory Committee provides comment with respect to the
proposed Tree Removal Permit Application for 61 Spruce Street; and
3.That the Heritage Advisory Committee provide direction to Council.
Background
The subject property is listed within the heritage conservation district as designated under,
Part V of the OHA. Under Tree Protection Bylaw 5850-16, Section 9 (1) (b) states:
If a tree subject to an application is found by the Director to be a Heritage Tree, the Director
shall not issue a permit unless the injury, destruction or removal is approved by Council
following a review by the Town’s Heritage Advisory Committee.
On May 25, 2018, the Parks Department received a Tree Removal Permit Application from
the forestry company Alpine Arborist, for the removal of an American Elm located on the
property of 61 Spruce Street.
The removal application completed by Alpine Arborist’s consulting arborist, describes the
health and structural integrity of the existing tree as fair, with a Diameter at Breast Height
(DBH) of 21cm. The application lists the following reasons for the removal of the tree:
100 John West Way
Box 1000
Aurora, Ontario
L4G 6J1
Phone: 905-727-3123 ext. 3223
Email:stienkamp@aurora.ca
www.aurora.ca
Town of Aurora
Operational Services
Parks Division
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 2
Page 1 of 12
June 11, 2018 -2-Tree Removal Permit Application
61 Spruce Street
•Tree is dead, dying or hazardous
•Tree is interfering with utilities/dwelling/foundation
•Tree growing on a severe lean over house
Parks Forestry staff attended site to confirm the content of the information included on the
application for removal. It was found that the tree is in fair condition, both in health and
structure. From our inspection, it appears the Elm has been growing on this lean for all of its
life as it strived to find proper light out from under the canopy of another large adjacent Sugar
Maple tree. It is not structurally unsound in our opinion. The tree is over the roof due to its
lean. Additionally it was noted that the tree is in close proximity to the house but we are not
able to confirm whether it is interfering with the house foundation.
This tree could be defined as a nuisance tree as it has more than likely just grown from a seed
from the other large adjacent Elm tree in a neighbouring yard and with the location and lean,
it not a favorable specimen.
While it is structurally sound, in time the integrity of the tree could become compromised as
the diameter and weight of the tree increases with age.
Attachments
Attachment #1 – Tree Removal Permit Application
Attachment #2 – Tree Protection Bylaw 5850-16
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 2
Page 2 of 12
Attachment #1Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 2 Page 3 of 12
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 2 Page 4 of 12
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 2 Page 5 of 12
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 2 Page 6 of 12
Attachment #2Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 2 Page 7 of 12
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 2 Page 8 of 12
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 2 Page 9 of 12
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 2 Page 10 of 12
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 2 Page 11 of 12
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 2 Page 12 of 12
Page 1 of 2
5. Consent Agenda
Moved by Councillor Thompson
Seconded by Councillor Thom
C1. General Committee Meeting Report of May 1, 2018
1. That the General Committee meeting report of May 1, 2018, be received and
the following recommendations carried by the Committee approved:
(C4) Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of April 9, 2018
1. That the Heritage Advisory Committee meeting minutes of April 9, 2018,
be received for information.
(R7) Summary of Committee Recommendations Report No. 2018-05
1. That Summary of Committee Recommendations Report No. 2018-05 be
received; and
2. That the Committee recommendations contained within this report be
approved.
Carried
Approved Recommendations from Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting
Minutes of April 9, 2018:
1. HAC18-007 – Request to Designate under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, 83
Temperance Street “Ireland-Moore House”
(a) That the House located at 83 Temperance Street be designated under Part IV of the
Ontario Heritage Act as a property of cultural heritage value or interest; and
(b) That the Town Clerk be authorized to publish and serve Council’s Notice of Intention
to Designate as per requirements of the Act; and
Extract from
Council Meeting of
Tuesday, May 8, 2018
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 3
Page 1 of 2
Council Extract – Tuesday, May 8, 2018 Page 2 of 2
(c) That the designation by-law be brought before Council for passing if no objections
were received within the thirty (30) day objection period as per requirements of the
Act; and
(d) That the owners of 83 Temperance Street be thanked for their support of the
designation of the subject heritage property.
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 3
Page 2 of 2
Public Release
June 8, 2018
Town of Aurora
Additional Items to
Heritage Advisory Committee
Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
7 p.m., Holland Room
•Item 4 – HAC18-011 – Request to Remove a Property from the Aurora
Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or
Interest, 29 Church Street
(Report to be provided at the meeting)
•Item 5 – General Committee Report No. PDS18-069 – Renovation of the Aurora
Armoury – 89 Mosley Street
Recommended:
1.That General Committee Report No. PDS18-069 be received for information.
Town of Aurora
Heritage Advisory Committee Report No.
HAC18-011
Subject: Request to Remove a Property from the Aurora Register of
Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest
29 Church Street
Prepared by: Marco Ramunno, Director, Planning and Development Services
Department: Planning and Development Services
Date: June 11, 2018
Recommendation
1. That Report No. HAC18-011 be received; and
2. That the Heritage Advisory Committee recommend to Council:
a) That the property located at 29 Church Street be removed from the
Aurora Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest;
b) That future building elevations are subject to review by the Design
Review Panel and approval of Planning Staff.
Executive Summary
The purpose of this report is to provide Council with recommendations from the
Heritage Advisory Committee regarding the request to remove the property located at
Street from the Aurora Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.
• The structure was constructed circa 1870 and was moved from Victoria Street in
1948. A second storey was added in 1992.
• James Mosley, probably John Mosley’s brother, purchased the lot in 1855.
Background
The owner of the property located at 29 Church Street submitted an Application to
request that the subject property be removed from the Aurora Register of Properties of
Cultural Heritage Value or Interest on May 19, 2018.
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 4
Page 1 of 11
June 11, 2018 Page 2 of 6 Report No. HAC18-011
Location
The subject property is located South West of Church Street and Victoria Street,
municipally known as 29 Church Street. More specifically, the building is located across
the street from 22 Church Street (Aurora Cultural Centre).
Provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act for delisting process
According to Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act, a Municipal Register of Cultural
Heritage Value or Interest may include properties that have not been designated under
the Ontario Heritage Act, but that the Council of a Municipality believes to be of cultural
heritage value or interest.
The principal implication of properties non-designated and listed on the Aurora Register
pertains to subsection 27. (3) of the Ontario Heritage Act where,
If property included in the register under subsection (1.2) has not been
designated under section 29, the owner of the property shall not demolish
or remove a building or structure on the property or permit the demolition or
removal of the building or structure unless the owner gives the council of
the municipality at least 60 days notice in writing of the owner’s intention to
demolish or remove the building or structure or to permit the demolition or
removal of the building or structure. 2006, c. 11, Sched. B, s. 11 (2).
The purpose of providing Council with 60 days to determine the Notice of Intention is to
provide time to determine whether or not the property should be designated under the
Ontario Heritage Act. According to subsection 27(1.3) of the Ontario Heritage Act, the
Council of a Municipality shall, before removing the reference to such a property from
the Register, consult with its Municipal Heritage Committee.
Analysis
History of the Property
The property is listed and undesignated on the Aurora Register of Properties of Cultural
Heritage Value or Interest and can be described as a 1 storey residential dwelling. The
original structure was built c.1870, the residential unit was moved from Victoria Street in
1948.An addition was added onto the side of the residential building in 1992. The
builder is unknown.
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 4
Page 2 of 11
June 11, 2018 Page 3 of 6 Report No. HAC18-011
John Mosley had his extensive landholdings in the south-east quadrant of town
subdivided into building lots in 1853, by means of Plan 68. The house originally stood
on part of the northern section of lot 4, south side Mosley, within that plan. It stood
immediately south of what was first the Disciples Church, later Health Hall, and now
Victoria Hall.
James Mosley, (assumed as John Mosley’s brother) purchased the whole of that lot 4 in
1855. Unfortunately land records do not usually mention buildings, and the assessment
rolls for that period are not available.
In 1882 the house was sold to the Reynolds family, who would retain ownership for
almost forty years. They owned the southern part of the north half, and about a year
after Thomas Reynolds purchased that section the northern part of the north half was
sold to the trustees of the Disciples of Christ Church.
For much of the Reynolds family’s tenure the house was occupied by Elizabeth
Grimshaw, who was the daughter of Thomas and Christiana Reynolds. Elizabeth, a
widow, died in 1910 and thereafter the property was managed by her son Herbert
Grimshaw. Herbert was a successful baker in town, so it is not surprising that the
assessment rolls show us that the tenant in 1921, Russell Major, was a baker. Mr. Major
purchased the property a bit later in 1921, thus removing it from the
Reynolds/Grimshaw family.
Four years later the site was acquired by John and Jessie Gray [often seen as Grey].
This retired couple had been a grocer in Maple -Vaughan Township. They held
properties large and small all over Aurora, from modest homes like this one to the Wells
Block, still standing on the north side of Wellington Street just east of Yonge. Once
again the house became a rental property.
Owner-occupation returned in 1934 when William and Annie Summers acquired the
house on Victoria Street. They remained in possession of the property until 1947.
By 1947 the old public school on Church Street was overcrowded and the town was
growing rapidly with post-war development. With the idea of expanding the Church
Street structure or building anew, the Aurora Public School Board acquired the two
properties immediately north of the school playground: a brick house immediately
adjacent to the existing school, and the Summers house.
In the spring of 1948, the house was purchased by Mr. J. Fleury. The Joseph Fleury
who (with his wife Lillian) purchased the house was not the Joseph Fleury of Fleury
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 4
Page 3 of 11
June 11, 2018 Page 4 of 6 Report No. HAC18-011
plow fame. No close connection is immediately apparent, but a full genealogical search
has not been conducted.
The Fleurys soon sold their lot with its “new” house. James and Sadie Wilson bought
the property in 1949; the1953 voters list shows Fred and Jean Anderson at 29 Church
Street. The Andersons would go on to purchase the property in 1972. Fred Anderson
was the executor for James Wilson’s estate. Mrs. Anderson became the owner in 1988,
passing it on to her son and daughter-in-law in 1992. Jean Anderson died in May of
2018.
Heritage Features of the Existing Building
The existing building can be described as a 1 storey square shaped structure with a
gabled roof. The front elevation of the building displays a one storey covered
unenclosed front porch with a hipped roof. The roof of the building is currently brown
shingled. The exterior walls of the building are coated with a cream stucco with the
window frames brown matching the roof shingles.
Building Evaluation
The Evaluation Working Group met to perform an objective evaluation of the subject
property on Wednesday January 24, 2018 (See Attachment 3). The Evaluation Criteria
for assessing the cultural heritage value of cultural heritage resources have been
developed by the Town in consultation with its Municipal Heritage Committee. As per
Section 13.3 e) of the Official Plan, Priority will be given to designating all Group 1
heritage resources in the Register.
The purpose of the Evaluation is to identify the design/physical value,
historical/associative value, and contextual value of the property as per Ontario
Regulation 9/06, which outlines the criteria for determining cultural heritage value or
Interest under the Ontario Heritage Act in order to conserve significant heritage
resources.
The Evaluation found the subject property to score at Group 2, suggesting that the
property is “moderately significant, worthy of documentation and preservation as part of
a historic grouping”.
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 4
Page 4 of 11
June 11, 2018 Page 5 of 6 Report No. HAC18-011
Legal Considerations
None.
Financial Implications
There are no financial implications.
Communications Considerations
No communication required.
Alternative(s) to the Recommendation
1. Refuse the request and recommend that the property remain listed on the Aurora
Registrar of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.
2. Recommend Designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.
Conclusions
The subject was evaluated using the Town of Aurora Heritage Building Evaluation
Guide and was rated in Group 2, which encourages the retention of the building as well
as designation under the Ontario Heritage Act. Should the property be removed from
the Register, the future building elevations will be reviewed by the Urban Design Panel
and Planning Staff prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Attachments
Attachment #1 – Location Map
Attachment #2 – Heritage Resource Brief (2017)
Attachment #3 – Evaluation Working Group Score, 29 Church Street
Attachment #4 – Present photo of 29 Church Street (June, 2018)
Previous Reports
None.
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 4
Page 5 of 11
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 4 Page 6 of 11
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 4 Page 7 of 11
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 4 Page 8 of 11
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 4 Page 9 of 11
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 4 Page 10 of 11
Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 4 Page 11 of 11
Town of Aurora
General Committee Report No. PDS18-069
Subject: Renovation of the Aurora Armoury - 89 Mosley Street
Prepared by: Anthony Ierullo, Manager of Policy Planning and Economic
Development
Department: Planning and Development Services
Date: June 5, 2018
Recommendation
1. That Report No. PDS18-069 be received; and
2. That Council approve the design of the Aurora Armoury as outlined in this
report; and
3. That in accordance with the Aurora Hydro Sale Investment Reserve Fund By-
law No. 5439.12, Council determines that completion of the Aurora Armoury
project is in the best interests of the Town; and
4. That, having provided the necessary public notice required of Bylaw No.
5439.12, the budget for the Armoury restoration and renovation be increased
by $4 ,618,800 to a total budget of $4,883,800, and that the additional funding
be sourced from the Aurora Hydro Sale Investment Reserve Fund; and
5. That the above budget includes a 1% contribution in the amount of $46,100 to
the Town’s Public Art Reserve Fund in accordance with the Official Plan
requirements.
Executive Summary
• The Aurora Armoury was acquired by the Town in 2014 with the intent to restore the
property and secure an appropriate use that supports the Town’s Strategic Plan.
• Council has approved funding to complete the design, interior demolition and
removal of hazardous materials in conjunction with an approved provincial grant.
• The Town’s Architects have completed detailed design for the building that is in line
with the conceptual design previously presented to Council. The design effectively
maximizes the short and long term utility of the building, while restoring the heritage
elements of the building and strengthening the link between the Armoury and Town
Park.
Additional Items to Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 5
Page 1 of 19
June 5, 2018 Page 2 of 10 Report No. PDS18-069
• The Town’s new tenant Niagara College has reviewed the proposed design
drawings and confirmed that the proposed scope of work is acceptable.
• Staff are recommending that Council approve funds and authorize the construction
tender with the intent that the building can begin operating in early 2019.
• Staff are also recommending that 1% of the project budget be allocated to the
Town’s Public Art Fund.
Background
The Aurora Armoury (89 Mosley St) is unique in that it is located within a public park and
was designed and operated as an Armoury under the Department of National Defense.
The Armoury itself is a heritage structure that represents a significant piece of Canadian
and Auroran heritage. The property was acquired by the Town of Aurora in September
2014 with the intent to restore the property and secure an appropriate use that supports
the Town’s Strategic Plan priorities. On November 28, 2017, Council directed staff to
proceed with the detailed design of the building including the necessary landscaping
elements to re-establish the connection between the Armoury and Town Park.
Staff have been working to with GOW Hastings Architects to complete detailed design for
the site. These activities include the completion of all necessary plans and studies
required to secure the necessary building permits and issue tender documents to procure
a contractor to proceed with construction. These activities have resulted in the preparation
of the attached drawings that are further summarized in the following paragraphs.
Staff have also completed the demolition of the interior of the building and the removal of
any known hazardous materials within the building. This does not include a small area on
the exterior of the building with a pre-existing heating fuel spill that is not recommended
for remediation. This area is isolated, does not pose a significant risk for migration, does
not pose a risk to human health and is not anticipated to impact the proposed renovation
of the property.
Completing the required remediation and interior demolition during the design phase of
the project is expected to assist in limiting cost overruns and accelerating project
timelines. In order to proceed further with the project, staff require Council direction on
the proposed renovation and the required budgets to issue tender documents and begin
construction.
Additional Items to Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 5
Page 2 of 19
June 5, 2018 Page 3 of 10 Report No. PDS18-069
Analysis
Armoury Redesign builds on Conceptual Design
Staff have been working with GOW Hastings Architects to complete the design for the
renovation of the property. The focus of the design was to produce a multi-purpose facility
that can support the new tenant (Canadian Food and Wine Institute) and be used as a
municipal facility. The drawings build on the concepts that were previously presented to
Council in November 2017. As previously outlined in the conceptual design, the building
continues to accommodate three distinct uses concurrently including:
• a 32 seat classroom/meeting space with limited office/administration space
(northern side of the building);
• 250 person event/reception/multi-purpose space(central area in the building); and,
• a 12 seat teaching kitchen/demonstration area (southern side of the building).
These uses are supported by restroom facilities that are accessible both from within the
building and by an exterior entrance into Town Park, basic kitchen facilities and storage.
The building floorplan and related interior and exterior renderings are further illustrated in
Attachment 1.
Heritage Consideration
The architect has reviewed the available historic documentation related to 89 Mosley St
to identify the key historic design elements of the building. Based on this information, the
restoration includes maintaining the original building and roof configuration, maintaining
or restoring original openings (where possible) and removing and replacing the existing
aluminum and vinyl siding with vertical wood siding that better replicates the original
materials and design. As a result, a wood Board and Batten configuration is proposed for
the exterior of the historic structure. The building addition has been designed using
modern elements that complement the historic elements of the building, which is
consistent with the advice of heritage consultant on the project.
As a result of comments received from consultation with the Town’s Heritage Advisory
Committee, the eastern and northern facades have been revised to be consistent with the
original building design. This is highlighted by the removal of two roll up doors on the
eastern façade from the conceptual design to create a design that better replicates the
original building configuration. These facades now also feature significantly less glazing
than previously envisioned and similar window and door openings, which will also help to
Additional Items to Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 5
Page 3 of 19
June 5, 2018 Page 4 of 10 Report No. PDS18-069
limit potential noise and light impacts on the neighboring land uses. The design also
includes display of heritage images on several prominent interior walls to highlight the
history associated with this building. The Architect has been working with the curator of
the Aurora Museum to develop a design for the display walls.
Accessibility Requirements
The Architect has presented the proposed design to the Town’s Accessibility Advisory
Committee and has revised the design based on the feedback received. The most
prominent revision was the redesign of the accessibility ramp at the front of the building
to significantly reduce the pitch to allow for improved ease of use. The Architect also
included one additional accessibility parking space and an electric door opener at the
front entrance. The design is fully complaint with the requirements of the Ontario Building
Code.
Design Re-establishes the link between the Aurora Armoury and Town Park
Following the demolition of the interior of the building, the Town was able to confirm the
historic existence of a prominent roll up door on the westerly façade of the building. This
demonstrates that the building did at one time feature a more direct connection to Town
Park as envisioned in the proposed design. The Town’s Repurposing Study first identified
an opportunity to establish a physical and operational connection between the Aurora
Armoury and Town Park. The architects also found photographic evidence of a
connection between the Armoury and Town Park. The current situation reflects efforts to
minimize potential land use conflicts with the use of fencing and signage as well as the
historic removal of windows along the western edge of the building. The goal of the
design was to remove these barriers and introduce new elements that allow the two
properties to better complement each other from both a design and use perspective.
This connection is reintroduced with the removal of exterior barriers/fencing and the
introduction of glass elements within the central areas of the building and the proposed
extension. This is further supported by a new outdoor patio/deck area as well as new
exterior elements along on southern and western facades. These areas are designed to
integrate with activities planned inside the building as well as service activities in Town
Park. This includes the introduction of two new service counters that will provide food and
beverage service into Town Park. The landscape design includes approximately 2000
square feet of new exterior space, while preserving all of the existing trees in Town Park.
The conceptual landscape plan for 89 Mosley is highlighted in Attachment 2.
Additional Items to Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 5
Page 4 of 19
June 5, 2018 Page 5 of 10 Report No. PDS18-069
Design Options
Exterior Wood Finish
The design includes unstained cedar wood exterior that will weather naturally. However,
the architect has also highlighted the option to install a more durable chemically treated
Pine product known as Accoya as the exterior wood finish. This product comes with a
25% premium with a promise of an extended life on the product (3 to 4 time’s traditional
Cedar). The Town’s cost estimate suggests that the Accoya product will cost
approximately $50,000 more than traditional cedar wood. Staff recommend the
installation of the Accoya product due the long term longevity and durability of the product.
Roof Materials
The architect identified wood, zinc and copper as roof materials that are most likely to be
used at the time when the Armoury was constructed. The Architect is not recommending
a wooden roof due to the cost and upkeep associated with this material particularly when
considering the recommended exterior wood finish.
As a cost effective alternative, the Architect is recommending a grey metal roof material
with an option to install either a copper or zinc roof. The premium to install a copper roof
in lieu of the metal standard is $800,000, while the premium for the zinc roof is $380,000.
It is recommended that Council proceed with the metal roof due the cost of the
alternatives.
Exterior Deck Finish
The Architect has identified two potential finishes for the new exterior deck area. The base
option includes a coloured permeable asphalt product with permeable rubber surrounding
the existing trees in Town Park. The permeable asphalt material could be replaced with
a composite deck material at an additional cost of $30,000. Staff are recommending that
Council proceed with the permeable asphalt material due to the additional costs and
potential risk that the required deck foundation could damage the root structure of the
existing trees.
Design has been reviewed and approved by Post-Secondary partner
The Town recently agreed to lease the Armoury to the Canadian Food and Wine Institute
as a post-secondary facility. The lease requires that the Town receive confirmation that
the college is satisfied with the proposed design of the facility. Staff have confirmed that
Additional Items to Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 5
Page 5 of 19
June 5, 2018 Page 6 of 10 Report No. PDS18-069
the college has reviewed the proposed design drawings and confirmed that the proposed
scope of work is acceptable.
Advisory Committee Review
The design has been presented to the Town’s Heritage Advisory Committee and
Accessibility Advisory Committee and staff have incorporated comments.
Legal Considerations
The renovation of 89 Mosley is required to satisfy the requirements of an executed
Lease Agreement with the Canadian Food and Wine Institute.
Financial Implications
Estimated Construction Costs
The Town’s Class A cost estimate suggests that the median cost for the proposed
renovation and addition is approximately $3,741,000 including design contingency,
landscaping and other potential costs related to the integration of the site into Town Park.
It is also recommended that the budget include a 10% construction contingency as is
customary with capital projects. The design contingency is meant to address the costs
associated with minor changes to the current design, while the construction contingency
will address the costs associated with change orders during construction due to site
conditions. The detailed cost estimate for the proposed renovation is summarized in
Attachment 3.
Additional Fees and Allowances
In addition to the construction costs, it is recommended that the Town carry a $200,000
cash allowance for refrigeration, venting and kitchen equipment. Moreover, the
administrative fees for the continuation of the Architectural contract fees are estimated at
$215,000.
Cost Considerations
There are a number of factors that contribute to the increased project costs. These costs
include the cost to construct a raft foundation for the proposed addition rather than a
traditional foundation to address the unusually poor soils in the area. The cost consultant
Additional Items to Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 5
Page 6 of 19
June 5, 2018 Page 7 of 10 Report No. PDS18-069
has also noted larger than typical allowances to address the added volatility in the
construction trade market since the time of preparation of the Class D cost estimate. The
architect has also included two small mechanical mezzanines to contain mechanical and
electrical equipment and reduce the amount of equipment on the exterior of the building.
The reduction of equipment on the exterior of the building is meant to reduce potential
noise impacts on neighboring properties as highlighted in the community consultation. It
is also important to note that estimate considers the median cost rather than the low bid
cost through a competitive procurement. It is anticipated that the low bid through a
competitive bid process would be lower than the median cost outlined above.
External Funding
Staff have submitted an application for $130,000 in provincial funding from the Municipal
GHG Challenge Fund. Staff is also recommending that the $75,292 in provincial funding
under the Main Street Revitalization Fund be applied to this project. There is an additional
$140,000 in funding approved under the Canada 150 Fund that will be applied to this
project. The Town is also in discussions with York Region as well as the respective federal
and provincial representatives regarding potential funding options for the project. In
addition to potential public sector funding, staff have been in discussions with private
sector partners regarding sponsorship opportunities that could contribute to the
construction costs. These revenues will be deducted from the project costs as funds are
secured.
Shared Project Management Fees
The Town of Aurora will be supporting this project with specialized internal project
management resources as we undertake corporately to enrich our project management
discipline to major projects. A specialized internal resource will be hired to assist with
this and is being funded by a charge to each affected project internally. The internal
charge apportioned for this project is $9,100.
Public Art Contribution
It is also recommended that the Town allocate 1% of the final project cost for public art
as stipulated in the Town’s Official Plan. Staff are currently developing a public art policy
that will help to direct expenditures from the Public Art Fund. The new policy will be
presented to Council for approval at a later date.
Additional Items to Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 5
Page 7 of 19
June 5, 2018 Page 8 of 10 Report No. PDS18-069
Budget Summary
The estimated project budget is summarized in Table 1 below:
Estimated
Budget
Design Costs
(4.09% of Construction)
$215,000
Construction Costs 3,741,000
Equipment Allowance 200,000
Construction Contingency 374,000
Non-refundable taxes 79,700
Sub-total $4,609,700
Contribution to Public Art Reserve
$46,100
Internal project management fees $9,100
Total Budget $4,664,900
Staff are recommending that Council approve budget for the project from the Aurora
Hydro Sale Investment Reserve Fund.
Communications Considerations
Staff will continue to inform Council and the community through the construction phase
of this project through the use of Council highlights, the Armoury Webpage and social
media.
Link to Strategic Plan
This report was prepared in support of the Strategic Plan and directly relates to various
key action items.
Additional Items to Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 5
Page 8 of 19
June 5, 2018 Page 9 of 10 Report No. PDS18-069
Alternative(s) to the Recommendation
Council may choose to not authorize funding to complete the restoration of 89 Mosley
Street. Council may also approve the following draft recommendations authorizing an
increase to the budget for alternate design options:
1. That the budget for the Armoury restoration and renovation be increased by
$800,000 to allow for the installation of the copper roof alternative in lieu of the
budgeted metal steel roof, and that the additional funding be sourced from the
Aurora Hydro Sale Investment Reserve Fund; and
2. That the budget for the Armoury restoration and renovation be increased by
$380,000 to allow for the installation of the zinc roof alternative in lieu of the
budgeted metal steel roof, and that the additional funding be sourced from the
Aurora Hydro Sale Investment Reserve Fund; and
3. That the budget for the Armoury restoration and renovation be increased by $50,000
to allow for the installation of the treated pine Accoya exterior alternative in lieu of
the budgeted cedar exterior, and that the additional funding be sourced from the
Aurora Hydro Sale Investment Reserve Fund; and
4. That the budget for the Armoury restoration and renovation be increased by $30,000
to allow for the installation of the composite exterior deck alternative in lieu of the
budgeted permeable pavement exterior deck, and that the additional funding be
sourced from the Aurora Hydro Sale Investment Reserve Fund.
Conclusions
The Aurora Armoury was acquired by the Town in 2014 with the intent to restore the
property and secure an appropriate use that supports the Town’s Strategic Plan.
As directed by Council, the Town’s Architects have completed the detailed design for
the building that is in line with the conceptual design previously presented to Council.
The design effectively maximizes the short and long term utility of the building, while
restoring the heritage elements of the building and strengthening the link between the
Armoury and Town Park. Staff are recommending that Council approve funds and
authorize the construction tender with the intent that the building can begin operating in
early 2019.
Additional Items to Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 5
Page 9 of 19
Additional Items to Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 5 Page 10 of 19
Additional Items to Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 5 Page 11 of 19
Additional Items to Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 5 Page 12 of 19
Additional Items to Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 5 Page 13 of 19
Additional Items to Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 5 Page 14 of 19
Additional Items to Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 5 Page 15 of 19
Additional Items to Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 5 Page 16 of 19
Additional Items to Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 5 Page 17 of 19
Additional Items to Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 5 Page 18 of 19
Additional Items to Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday, June 11, 2018Item 5 Page 19 of 19
Public Release
June 11, 2018
Town of Aurora
Additional Items No. 2 to
Heritage Advisory Committee
Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
7:00 p.m., Holland Room
• Delegation (a) – Ryan Panet, Re: Item 1 – HAC18-010 – Heritage Permit
Application, 60 Fleury Street, File: NE-HCD-HPA-18-05
Note: According to the Procedure By-law, the consent of at least a two-thirds majority
of the Members present is required to permit the addition of Delegation (a) to the
agenda.
Additional Items No. 2 to Heritage Advisory Committee
Meeting Agenda
Monday, June 11, 2018
Item 1
Page 1 of 1