Loading...
AGENDA - Heritage Advisory Committee - 20160613HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA MONDAY,JUNE 13,2016 7 P.M. HOLLAND ROOM AURORA TOWN HALL PUBLIC RELEASE June 6,2016 TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA DATE:Monday,June 13,2016 TIME AND LOCATION:7 p.m.,Holland Room,Aurora Town Hall 1.DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND GENERAL NATURE THEREOF 2.APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA RECOMMENDED: THAT the agenda as circulated by Legal and Legislative Services be approved. 3.RECEIPT OF THE MINUTES Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of April 11,2016 pg.1 RECOMMENDED: THAT the Heritage Advisory Committee meeting minutes of April 11,2016,be received for information. 4.DELEGATIONS 5.MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 1.HAC16-004 –Heritage Permit Application pg.6 24 Catherine Avenue File:NE-HCD-HPA-16-03 Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Page 2 of 3 RECOMMENDED: THAT Report No.HAC16-004 be received;and THAT the Heritage Advisory Committee recommend to Council: THAT Heritage Permit Application NE-HCD-HPA-16-03 be approved to permit the construction of a 117m2 accessory structure;and THAT the Owner clarify materials of the proposed accessory structure as indicated in the staff report;and THAT the Owner incorporate a rear yard amenity area or soft landscaping if possible. 2.HAC16-005 –Request to Remove a Property from the Aurora pg.18 Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest 20 Ransom Street RECOMMENDED: THAT Report No.HAC16-005 be received;and THAT the Heritage Advisory Committee recommend to Council: THAT the property located at 20 Ransom Street be removed from the Aurora Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest. THAT the proposed elevations are subject to approval of Planning Staff to ensure the proposed new dwelling will maintain th e heritage character of the area. 6.INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 3.Extract from Council Meeting of April 12,2016 pg.35 Re:Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of March 7,2016 Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Page 3 of 3 RECOMMENDED: THAT the Extract from Council Meeting of April 12,2016,regarding the Heritage Advisory Committee meeting minutes of March 7,2016,be received for information. 4.Extract from Council Meeting of April 26,2016 pg.36 Re:Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of April 11,2016 RECOMMENDED: THAT the Extract from Council Meeting of April 26,2016,regarding the Heritage Advisory Committee meeting minutes of April 11,2016,be received for information. 7.NEW BUSINESS 8.ADJOURNMENT TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Date:Monday,April 11,2016 Time and Location:7 p.m.,Holland Room,Aurora Town Hall Committee Members:Councillor Jeff Thom (Chair),Councillor Wendy Gaertner (Vice Chair),Barry Bridgeford,James Hoyes,John Kazilis, Bob McRoberts (Honorary Member),and Martin Paivio Member(s)Absent:Kathy Constable and Carol Gravelle Other Attendees:Councillor Tom Mrakas,Marco Ramunno,Director of Planning and Development Services,Jeff Healey,Planner, and Samantha Kong,Council/Committee Secretary The Chair called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. 1.DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND GENERAL NATURE THEREOF There were no declarations of pecuniary interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act. 2.APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Moved by Martin Paivio Seconded by Barry Bridgeford THAT the agenda as circulated by Legal and Legislative Services be approved. CARRIED 3.RECEIPT OF THE MINUTES Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of March 7,2016 Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Minutes Page -1 -1 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes Monday,April 11,2016 Page 2 of 5 Moved by John Kazilis Seconded by James Hoyes THAT the Heritage Advisory Committee meeting minutes of March 7,2016,be received for information. CARRIED 4.DELEGATIONS (a)Chris Alexander,Owner of 101 Tyler Street Re:Item 2 –Memorandum from Planner;re:Additional Information – Heritage Advisory Committee Report No.HAC15-015,101 Tyler Street Mr.Alexander provided a brief history of the property and presented concept elevations as a reference to his proposal of building a new home. Moved by Councillor Gaertner Seconded by James Hoyes THAT the comments of the delegation be received and referred to Item 2. CARRIED 5.MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION The Committee consented to consider Item 2 prior to Item 1. 1.HAC16-003 –Heritage Permit Application,20 Catherine Avenue, File:NE-HCD-HPA-16-01 Staff indicated that evidence suggests the existing accessory structure is not original and noted that the proposed location,materials,and colours of the new accessory structure would be consistent with the neighbourhood and original location of the accessory structure on the property. The Committee expressed support towards the design and location of the proposed accessory structure. Moved by James Hoyes Seconded by John Kazilis Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Minutes Page -2 -2 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes Monday,April 11,2016 Page 3 of 5 THAT Report No.HAC16-003 be received;and THAT the Heritage Advisory Committee recommend to Council: THAT Heritage Permit Application NE-HCD-HPA-15-06 be approved to permit the construction of a 52m2 accessory structure as per submitted plans;and THAT the demolition of the existing detached garage be approved. CARRIED 2.Memorandum from Planner Re:Additional Information,Heritage Advisory Committee Report No. HAC15-015,101 Tyler Street The Committee expressed support for the construction of a new dwelling as presented in the proposed elevation drawings and requested an effort from the owner,in consultation with staff,to retain the tree in the front yard if feasible. Moved by Bob McRoberts Seconded by John Kazilis THAT the memorandum regarding Additional Information,Heritage Advisory Committee Report No.HAC15-015,101 Tyler Street,be received;and THAT the Heritage Advisory Committee recommend to Council: THAT the property located at 101 Tyler Street be considered for removal from the Aurora Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest;and THAT the proposed elevations be subject to approval of Planning staff to ensure the proposed new dwelling will maintain the heritage character of the area;and THAT items of significance be salvaged and incorporated into the new dwelling or donated to the Aurora Architectural Salvage Program;and THAT the tree located in the front yard of the existing dwelling be retained,if feasible. CARRIED Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Minutes Page -3 -3 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes Monday,April 11,2016 Page 4 of 5 6.INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 3.Memorandum from Planner Re:Approval of Wood Plaque Application,7 Kennedy Street Staff provided a brief history of the property and indicated that three notable residents have lived in the home.Staff proposed that the wood plaque state “The Ellwood Davis House,1914”due to the length of ownership and occupancy by Ellwood Davis and the Davis family. The Committee expressed support and commended the owners for seeking approval of the wood plaque as it is a part of the Heritage Advisory Committee education initiative. Moved by Martin Paivio Seconded by Barry Bridgeford THAT the memorandum regarding Approval of Wood Plaque Application,7 Kennedy Street West,be received for information. CARRIED 4.Extract from Council Meeting of March 8,2016 Re:Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of February 8,2016 Moved by Bob McRoberts Seconded by James Hoyes THAT the Extract from Council Meeting of March 8,2016,regarding the Heritage Advisory Committee meeting minutes of February 8,2016,be received for information. CARRIED 7.NEW BUSINESS Staff extended a reminder to the Committee regarding the site visit to the Pet Cemetery on Friday,April 15,2016,and noted that interested members are to meet in the Holland Room at Town Hall by 8:30 a.m. Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Minutes Page -4 -4 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes Monday,April 11,2016 Page 5 of 5 8.ADJOURNMENT Moved by James Hoyes Seconded by Barry Bridgeford THAT the meeting be adjourned at 8 p.m. CARRIED COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS ARE NOT BINDING ON THE TOWN UNLESS OTHERWISE ADOPTED BY COUNCIL AT A LATER MEETING. Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Minutes Page -5 -5 - TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT No.HAC16-004 SUBJECT:Heritage Permit Application 24 Catherine Avenue File:NE-HCD-HPA-16-03 FROM:Marco Ramunno,Director of Planning &Building Services DATE:June 13,2016 THAT Report HAC16-004 be received;and THAT the Heritage Advisory Committee recommend to Council: THAT Heritage Permit Application NE-HCD-HPA-16-03 be approved to permit the construction of a 117m2 accessory structure;and THAT the Owner clarify materials of the proposed accessory structure as indicated in the staff report;and, THAT the Owner incorporate a rear yard amenity area or soft landscaping if possible. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT The purpose of this report is to provide Council with direction from the Heritage Advisory Committee regarding Heritage Permit Application NE-HCD-HPA-16-03 regarding the construction of a new accessory structure located at 24 Catherine Avenue,designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act as part of the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District. BACKGROUND The owner of the property located at 24 Catherine Avenue submitted Heritage Permit Application NE-HCD-HPA-16-03 on April 27,2016.The existing house was built in 1891.The house can be described as a two and a half storey,Ell-shaped House High Victorian Style with a gable roof and twin front gables. The owners propose to construct a 117m2 accessory structure to serve as a garage. The second floor of the proposed accessory structure is proposed for storage as shown in the submitted plans. The subject property was designated in 2006 under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act as part of the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District.Section 42 of the Act Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 1 Page -1 -6 - June 13,2016 -2 -Report No.HAC16-004 states that, No owner of property situated in a heritage conservation district that has been designated by a municipality under this Part shall do any of the following,unless the owner obtains a permit from the municipality to do so:“1.Alter,or permit the alteration of,any part of the property,other than the interior of any structure or building on the property;2.Erect, demolish or remove any building or structure on the property or permit the erection,demolition or removal of such a building or structure. The Heritage Permit Application was deemed complete by staff on May 16 2016. Council has 90 days to respond to the Application or else the Application is automatically approved. COMMENTS On May 16 2016,staff issued a Notice of Receipt on behalf of Council as per By-law 5365-11 (being a By-law to delegate certain assigned Council authority under the Ontario Heritage Act regarding the power to consent to alterations of designated heritage properties). Since the house is designated under Part V of the Act any alterations should be in compliance with the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District Plan (the Plan).Several policies were considered in reviewing the application.Sketches and location of the proposed accessory structure were provided by the owner are shown in Attachments 3 and 4. Proposed Accessory Structure Policy 9.1.2.1 of the Plan speaks to traditional spacing and driveway placement within the District.It is a guideline of the District Plan to “preserve traditional spacing of buildings,new garages for new or existing houses shall be separate rear or flankage outbuildings”.The proposed accessory structure is located in the rear yard and is setback approximately twenty-six (26)metres north of the historical main building.The accessory structure has proposed side yards of 1.2 meters (4 ft)to the east lot line and 3.8 metres (12.3 ft)to the west lot line.The proposed work is in agreement with this policy as the proposed accessory structure is located at the rear of the historic building. Policy 9.1.2.2 of the Plan identifies the need for appropriate rear yard spacing and amenity area.The existing rear yard of the property serves as a parking lot for the subject lands.The owner proposes to construct the accessory structure to the north of the parking spaces.Contrary to the parking arrangement as shown in Attachment 4,the owner proposes to continue the parking space arrangement as existing on the property. Although the spacing of the accessory structure from the main building is appropriate,it Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 1 Page -2 -7 - June 13,2016 -3 -Report No.HAC16-004 is recommended that the owner consider the inclusion of additional amenity area or soft landscaping in the rear yard. Policy 9.1.2.6 of the Plan speaks of Accessory Structures and states that “Since the district was always relatively urban in character,rear-yard garages and outbuildings are generally reflective of this in terms of overall design and are relatively modest in terms of scale and height”.The proposed accessory structure features a front gable roof with a window above the garage doors as shown on Attachment 4.The proposed structure measures a height of 4.5 metres from grade to the mean distance between the eave and the ridge of the roof.The proposed work is in agreement with this policy as the proposed accessory structure is meets the height requirements and design characteristics of the District Plan. Section 9.8.1 of the Plan identifies appropriate materials to be used for additions within the District.The applicant is proposing board and batten siding,with a stone trim for the accessory structure as shown on Attachment 3.The owner will clarify with staff the materials to be used for the roof and garage doors.The proposed material is considered to be appropriate within the District. LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN The conservation of heritage resources supports the Strategic Plan goal of Supporting an Exceptional Quality of Life for All through its accomplishment in satisfying requirements in objective Celebrating and Promoting our Culture. ALTERNATIVE(S)TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS None. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS None. PREVIOUS REPORTS None. CONCLUSIONS It is recommended to approve the Heritage Application Permit located at 24 Catherine Avenue,which is in compliance with the Northeast Old Aurora Heritage Conservation District Plan. Once a heritage permit application is received,Council has ninety (90)days from the Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 1 Page -3 -8 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 1 Page -4 -9 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 1 Page -5 -10 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 1 Page -6 -11 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 1 Page -7 -12 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 1 Page -8 -13 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 1 Page -9 -14 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 1 Page -10 -15 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 1 Page -11 -16 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 1 Page -12 -17 - TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT No.HAC16-005 SUBJECT:Request to Remove a Property from the Aurora Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest 20 Ransom Street FROM:Marco Ramunno,Director of Planning &Building Services DATE:June 13,2016 RECOMMENDATIONS THAT Report HAC16-005 be received;and THAT the Heritage Advisory Committee recommend to Council: THAT the property located at 20 Ransom Street be removed from the Aurora Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest. THAT the proposed elevations are subject to approval of Planning Staff to ensure the proposed new dwelling will maintain the heritage character of the area. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT The purpose of this report is to provide Council with direction from the Heritage Advisory Committee regarding the request to remove the property located at 20 Ransom Street from the Aurora Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest. BACKGROUND The owner of the property located at 20 Ransom Street submitted an Application to request that the subject property be removed from the Aurora Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest on April 25,2016.The owner of the subject property wishes to construct a new single detached structure on the subject lands. According to Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act,a Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest may include properties that have not been designated under the Ontario Heritage Act,but that the Council of a Municipality believes to be of cultural heritage value or interest. The principal implication of properties non-designated and listed on the Aurora Register pertains to subsection 27.(3)of the Ontario Heritage Act where, Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 2 Page -1 -18 - June 13,2016 -2 -Report No.HAC16-005 If property included in the register under subsection (1.2)has not been designated under section 29,the owner of the property shall not demolish or remove a building or structure on the property or permit the demolition or removal of the building or structure unless the owner gives the council intention to demolish or remove the building or structure or to permit the demolition or removal of the building or structure.2006,c.11,Sched.B, s.11 (2). The purpose of providing Council with 60 days to determine the Notice of Intention is to provide time to determine whether or not the property should be designated under the Ontario Heritage Act.According to subsection 27.(1.3)of the Ontario Heritage Act,the Council of a Municipality shall,before removing the reference to such a property from the Register,consult with its Municipal Heritage Committee. COMMENTS The subject property is located on the north side of Ransom Street between Temperance Street and Yonge Street (See Attachment 1).The property is listed and non-designated on the Aurora Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest and can be described as a 1 and 1/2 storey House.The building was constructed in 1902,the builder of the main structure was Joseph Holman,who lived in the home from 1902 to 1913.A brief history and land ownership records for the property can be found in Attachment 5. The south (front)façade displays a side gable roof and a front porch,supported by two columns.The front porch appears to have been significantly modified in the past five years.The front façade displays a single double-hung window on the first floor,the window has been altered from its original size.The original siding of the main building has been covered and re-painted,however the existing siding reflects the original look of the building.A 1 ½storey addition is identified within a survey prepared for the property dated April 22 1966,the construction date of the addition is not known .A building permit was issued for the property in 2005,which comprised of many interior alterations to the addition and the original structure.An accessory garage is also located behind the main building,which accesses Temperance Street;the construction date of the garage is unknown. The subject property is located on the southern edge of the Heritage Resources Area boundary.The property can be described as a transition lot between homes of relatively new construction to the south and homes of older construction to the north and west (on Temperance Street). The Evaluation Working Group met to perform an objective evaluation of the subject property on Monday May 16,2016 (See Attachment 3).The Evaluation Criteria for assessing the cultural heritage value of cultural heritage resources have been Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 2 Page -2 -19 - June 13,2016 -3 -Report No.HAC16-005 developed by the Town in consultation with its Municipal Heritage Committee.As per Section 13.3 e)of the Official Plan,Priority will be given to designating all Group 1 heritage resources in the Register. The purpose of the Evaluation is to identify the design/physical value, historical/associative value,and contextual value of the property as per Ontario Regulation 9/06,which outlines the criteria for determining cultural heritage value or Interest under the Ontario Heritage Act in order to conserve significant heritage resources. The Evaluation found the subject property to score at Group 3,suggesting that the According to the Heritage Evaluation Guide for buildings scored within Group 3: The designation of the building pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act may be supported with an approved restoration plan,but would not necessarily be initiated by the Town unless part of a historic grouping such as an intact streetscape; Retention of the building on site is supported,particularly if part of a historic streetscape;and If the building is to be demolished,a photographic record,measured drawings and/or salvage of significant architectural elements may be required. The conservation of remaining physical attributes of the property would require formal designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act,making it necessary for owners to obtain Heritage Permits for proposed work. The Ontario Heritage Act provides criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest with Ontario Regulation 9/06.This Regulation requires that a building must exhibit significant design/physical,or associative,or contextual value to warrant designation.The Evaluation working group found the highest rated category for the building was to have contextual value,rated 41/100.The associative value for the building was rated 39/100.Design/physical value for the building was rated 30/100. Ransom Street,between Yonge Street to the east and Temperance Street to the west, encompasses a total of thirteen (13)properties,two (2)of which are listed on the Aurora Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.A neighbouring property municipally known as 12 Ransom Street was removed from the Registrar of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest by Council on August 11 2015,although the original structure continues to exist today.The predominant architectural designs of these homes are in a Workers House style.Furthermore an additional ten (10) properties are listed on the Aurora Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest along Temperance Street,most of which are designed in a Foursquare/ Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 2 Page -3 -20 - June 13,2016 -4 -Report No.HAC16-005 Edwardian style. The remaining single detached dwellings on the south side of Ransom Street are not of historical interest to the Town,most of which date to between approximately 1960 to present day.These homes reflect a variety of brick and stone construction and display attached garages on front elevations. Proposed Concept Plan The owner wishes to remove the property from the Aurora Register as a non-designated property to construct a new building.A Photo of the proposed building type were provided by the owner are shown in Attachment 4. The applicant is proposing to build a new single detached residence.The owner proposes to incorporate a mix of wood clapboard and board and batten siding.It is recommended that the massing of the proposed structure be considerate of the surrounding residential properties.It is also recommended that the proposed garage be setback or flush to the front face of the main building.Planning Staff will work with the applicant on detailed aspects of the building during the building permit process. LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN The conservation of heritage resources supports the Strategic Plan goal of Supporting an Exceptional Quality of Life for All through its accomplishment in satisfying requirements in objective Celebrating and Promoting our Culture. ALTERNATIVE(S)TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS 1.Refuse the application and recommend that the property remain listed on the Aurora Registrar of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest. 2.Refuse the application and recommend Designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS None. PREVIOUS REPORTS None. Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 2 Page -4 -21 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 2 Page -5 -22 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 2 Page -6 -23 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 2 Page -7 -24 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 2 Page -8 -25 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 2 Page -9 -26 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 2 Page -10 -27 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 2 Page -11 -28 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 2 Page -12 -29 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 2 Page -13 -30 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 2 Page -14 -31 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 2 Page -15 -32 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 2 Page -16 -33 - Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 2 Page -17 -34 - 7.ADOPTION OF ITEMS NOT REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 1 (with the exception of sub-items 6,9,and 10)and 2 were identified as items not requiring separate discussion. Moved by Councillor Pirri Seconded by Councillor Thom THAT the following recommendations with respect to the matters listed as “Items Not Requiring Separate Discussion”be adopted as submitted to Council and staff be authorized to take all necessary action required to give effect to same: 1.General Committee Meeting Report of April 5,2016 THAT the General Committee meeting report of April 5,2016,be received and the following recommendations carried by the Committee be approved: (8)Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of March 7,2016 THAT the Heritage Advisory Committee meeting minutes of March 7,2016,be received for information. CARRIED EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING OF TUESDAY,APRIL 12,2016 Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 3 Page -1 -35 - 7.ADOPTION OF ITEMS NOT REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION Item 1 (with the exception of sub-items 1,3,6,7,8,10,11,and 12),2,3,4 and 5 were identified as items not requiring separate discussion. Moved by Councillor Gaertner Seconded by Councillor Thompson THAT the following recommendations with respect to the matters listed as “Items Not Requiring Separate Discussion”be adopted as submitted to Council and staff be authorized to take all necessary action required to give effect to same: 1.General Committee Meeting Report of April 19,2016 THAT the General Committee meeting report of April 19,2016,be received and the following recommendations carried by the Committee be approved: (15)Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of April 11,2016 THAT the Heritage Advisory Committee meeting minutes of April 11,2016,be received;and THAT the Heritage Advisory Committee recommend to Council: 1.HAC16-003 –Heritage Permit Application,20 Catherine Avenue, File:NE-HCD-HPA-16-01 THAT Heritage Permit Application NE-HCD-HPA-15-06 be approved to permit the construction of a 52m2 accessory structure as per submitted plans;and THAT the demolition of the existing detached garage be approved. 2.Memorandum from Planner Re:Additional Information,Heritage Advisory Committee Report No.HAC15-015,101 Tyler Street THAT the property located at 101 Tyler Street be considered for removal from the Aurora Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest;and EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING OF TUESDAY,APRIL 26,2016 Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 4 Page -1 -36 - Council Extract –Tuesday,April 26,2016 Page 2 of 2 THAT the proposed elevations be subject to approval of Planning Staff to ensure the proposed new dwelling will maintain the heritage character of the area;and THAT items of significance be salvaged and incorporated into the new dwelling or donated to the Aurora Architectural Salvage Program;and THAT the tree located in the front yard of the existing dwelling be retained,if feasible. CARRIED Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Monday,June 13,2016 Item 4 Page -2 -37 - TOWN OF AURORA ADDITIONAL ITEMS FOR HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Monday,June 13,2016 7 p.m. Holland Room Delegation (a)Mark Hall and Ray Kurkjian,Representing the Applicant pg.1 Re:Allen Brown Heritage Home Delegation (b)Nick Racanelli and Frank Abbaglivio,Applicants pg.2 Re:Item 1 –HAC16-004 –Heritage Permit Application 24 Catherine Avenue,File:NE-HCD-HPA-16-03 x Additional Items for Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Monday,June 13,2016 Delegation (a)Page -1 -1 - Additional Items for Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting Monday,June 13,2016 Delegation (b)Page -1 -2 -