Loading...
MINUTES - Special Council - 19990923 TOWN OF AURORA SPECIAL COUNCIL - PUBLIC PLANNING MEETING NO. 27-99 Council Chambers Aurora Town Hall Thursday, September 23, 1999 7:30 p.m. ATTENDANCE COUNCIL MEMBERS Mayor Jones in the Chair; Councillors Griffith, Hartwell, Healy, Hinder, Hogg, McKenzie, Morris, and West. STAFF MEMBERS Chief Administrative Officer, Director of Corporate Services, Director of Planning, Planner, Administrative Co-ordinator and Administrative Assistant. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Councillor Morris declared a possible interest in the presentation by the Director of Planning, and Report No. PL99-097-281, concerning the Bayview Northeast 2B Secondary Plan, in reference to lands owned by Magna International within the 2B Secondary Plan area. Councillor Morris’s declaration was by virtue of her spouse being employed by a subsidiary of Magna. She did not take part in or vote on any questions in this regard or attempt in any way to influence the voting on such questions. Mayor Jones declared an interest in the presentation by the Director of Planning, and Report No. PL99-093-279, concerning Official Plan, rezoning and subdivision applications submitted for property municipally known as 119 Vandorf Sideroad. Mayor Jones’ declaration was by virtue of his employment with Timberlane Tennis and Country Club, which is located adjacent to the subject property. Mayor Jones did not take part in or vote on any questions in this regard or attempt in any way to influence the voting on such questions. APPROVAL OF AGENDA #663. Moved by Councillor Griffith Seconded by Councillor Hinder THAT the content of the Agenda be approved as outlined herein and that the order of the Agenda be changed from that circulated. CARRIED PUBLIC MEETINGS - PLANNING APPLICATIONS M I N U T E S Special Council – Public Planning Minutes No. 27-99 Page 2 Thursday, September 23, 1999 Mayor Jones advised that this meeting had been called as a Public Meeting with respect to three development proposals – (1) Applications for Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Bylaw Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision as submitted by 1351586 Ontario Limited respecting property municipally known as 119 Vandorf Sideroad (Files D09-07-99, D14-12-99 and D12-99003A); (2) Applications for Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Bylaw Amendment as submitted on behalf of Mrs. Anne Chapman respecting property municipally known as 520 Industrial Parkway South (Files D09-08- 99 and D14-15-99); and, (3) Proposed Official Plan Amendment respecting the Bayview East Urban Expansion Area – Bayview Northeast 2B Secondary Plan (File D09-10-96). The Public Meeting procedures and the opportunities available for persons to ask questions related to the item tabled for consideration were explained. Mayor Jones advised that any person who wished to receive further notice of the passage of any proposed bylaw under consideration should sign the information sheets available. In addition, Mayor Jones advised that any concerns with the proposal must be expressed during the Public Meeting or in writing prior to the adoption by Council of any amendment in order to protect the individual’s right of appeal to either the Region of York or the Ontario Municipal Board. It was noted that names and addresses of speakers were required to form part of the record of the proceedings. The Clerk confirmed that the required Notices of Public Meeting for the three applications were given and that the necessary signs were posted on the related properties in accordance with the rules of procedure under the Planning Act. PL99-094-280 – Applications for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Mrs. Anne Chapman 520 Industrial Parkway South Part of Lot 76, Concession 1 E.Y.S. Files D09-02-99, D14-04-99 Mr. Jim Kyle, Planner, presented an overview of the subject proposal, including the property location, surrounding land uses and the applicable Official Plan designation and Zoning By-law provisions affecting the subject lands. Mr. Kyle advised that the applicant had applied to change the Official Plan land use designation from Estate Residential to a site specific Campus Commercial designation, and further to change the zoning category from the Rural General (RU) Zone to the Service Commercial (C3) Exception Zone. It was noted that the purpose of the proposed amendments was to permit an automobile dealership on the subject property, with the potential of also allowing an automobile service centre, automobile washing establishment, automobile rentals and a restaurant with either take-out and/or drive thru facilities. Mr. Kyle displayed a site plan showing the location of the proposed dealership on the property, together with an architectural rendering of the building. Mr. Kyle outlined the relevant sections of the Official Plan pertaining to Campus Commercial Centres, Gateway development and the Oak Ridges Moraine. Mr. Kyle noted that because the property is on private services a Site Evaluation Report had been recently submitted by the applicant but the Report had yet to be reviewed by staff. Mr. Kyle summarized the departmental and agency comments that had been submitted for the proposed development, concluding that there were a number of issues including noise, CN concerns, urban design, buffering, servicing, trail location, Environmental Impact Statement, and preservation of stone pier from radial railway that needed to be addressed before any final recommendations could be presented to the Council. In addition Mr. Kyle indicated that the requested uses in addition to the Automotive dealership were not shown on the concept plan and may be hard to support from an urban design perspective. In conclusion, Mr. Kyle recommended that the applications be referred back to staff with the intent of reporting back to Council once the outstanding issues had been fully addressed. Applicant’s Comments Mr. Bert Dekema appeared before Council on behalf of the owner and advised that he was in the process of acquiring the subject property. He advised that while he had no Special Council – Public Planning Minutes No. 27-99 Page 3 Thursday, September 23, 1999 objection to the staff recommendations, there were a number of issues that required clarification. Mr. Dekema advised that the property was serviceable by water and that there were engineering methods to permit the servicing of the lot. He advised that issues related to any public address system and on-site lighting could be dealt with at the site plan approval stage. In reference to a take-out/drive thru restaurant, Mr. Dekema advised Council that it was not his intention to develop the property with a fast food restaurant like Burger King or Wendy’s, but rather, a type of restaurant that could provide a light lunch or coffee to the employees and customers of the dealership. Mr. Dekema noted that only those vehicles owned by the dealership would be washed. Mr. Dekema added that he had spoken with Sandra Chan, Planning Assistant for CN Rail, who had advised him that she had not visited the site, nor was she aware of the existing buffer on the property. Mr. Dekema noted that the CN letter was a standard form letter and that the required setback from the rail line right-of-way might be reduced from 30 metres to 15 metres. Public Comments Mr. Ben Kestein appeared before the Council on behalf of the conservation group P.A.R.K.S., and questioned who would be responsible for the construction and cost of sewer servicing for the property. Mr. Jeff Davies, solicitor, appeared on behalf of Greg and Kathryn Chorny, 12 Alm Court, Aurora, and expressed concern with the variety of different uses being proposed for the property. Mr. Davies advised that his clients were opposed to both the dealership and other proposed uses for the site. He noted that noise from public address systems could not be dealt with at the site plan agreement stage and that additional noise impacts could be realized from the movement of cars on site and from truck carriers loading/unloading cars. Mr. Davies also expressed concern with the visual impact of the development, given that the site was located in the gateway to Aurora. Mr. Davies then displayed a copy of the proposed site plan for the dealership showing the 30 metre setback required by CN Rail, noting that even reducing the setback to 15 metres would still cause significant impact on the site. Mr. Davies questioned the adequacy of the site size to accommodate the use, and noted that in terms of the Regional Official Plan, the project should be considered premature without the benefit of municipal services. He added that his clients were not opposed to some form of commercial development for the property, noting that a small office or medical building might be viable if the servicing constraints could be overcome. Mr. Davies concluded by requesting that the current applications be denied. Mr. K. Wehrenberg, 16 Cedar Drive, Aurora, expressed concern with the potential increase in traffic flow, indicating that it was already difficult to exit onto Yonge Street. Mr. Wehrenberg also expressed concern with the delivery of cars to the property, especially the parking of truck haulers on Industrial Parkway South. Mr. Michael Blair, 11 Alm Court, Aurora, expressed concern with the impact on both the value and quiet enjoyment of the estate residential properties to the south. Mr. Blair also objected to the subject property receiving municipal servicing in advance of the existing residential area. In response to the resident’s concerns, the applicant’s agent, Mr. Bert Dekema advised that he would be responsible for the cost of service extensions and he again re-iterated that engineering solutions were possible. Mr. Dekema added that he would undertake to do whatever was necessary to deal with noise impacts from any public address system and confirmed that there would be no outside speakers. Mr. Dekema stated that truck carriers would be required to comply with the provisions of the Highway Traffic Act, and that he would undertake to make the development visually attractive at the gateway to the Town. He added that heavy traffic volumes should be expected on Industrial Parkway South and that he would contact CN Rail to confirm that agency’s requirements for the site. Mr. Dekema concluded that the property was of sufficient size to adequately accommodate the proposed use. The public portion of the meeting closed at 8:12 p.m. and Council’s deliberations began. #664. Moved by Councillor West Seconded by Councillor Griffith Special Council – Public Planning Minutes No. 27-99 Page 4 Thursday, September 23, 1999 THAT the Applications for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment (Files D09-08-99 and D14-15-99) be considered at a second public meeting at such time as all identified and outstanding issues have been fully addressed by staff; and, That as part of the staff review, consideration be given to the potential impact of having similar land uses undertaken by different property owners or tenants. CARRIED Councillor Morris having previously declared an interest left the meeting at this time. PL99-097-281 – Proposed Official Plan Amendment Bayview East Urban Expansion Area Bayview Northeast 2B Secondary Plan File D09-10-96 Ms. Sue Seibert, Director of Planning, outlined the background and history leading up to the development of the Bayview Northeast 2B Secondary Plan. Ms. Seibert noted that out of OPA # 17 and the Growth Management Study, three urban expansion areas had been identified, the largest of which was the Bayview East Urban Expansion Area. She advised that during the initial planning stages, the Secondary Plan was split into two areas (i.e. 2A and 2B), to recognize the commitment made to Magna International to enable them to begin residential development after the completion of some components of the business park. Ms. Seibert advised that Secondary Plan Area 2A had been adopted by OPA # 20 and that the subject of tonight’s meeting was to consider comments and recommended changes received with respect to Area 2B. Mr. Craig Hunter, Planning Consultant for the Town of Aurora for the 2B lands, gave a presentation on the key changes to the Plan that had occurred since the June public meeting, and advised that he would address any outstanding issues, as well as respond to inquiries from both the public and Council. Mr. Hunter summarized the issues that had been directed by Council to finalize the Secondary Plan for the area. He then highlighted the main components of the revised Plan, together with a number of outstanding issues related to the East Aurora Wetland Complex, the requested boundary change on Wellington (Magna & Burnett), specific requests from Magna related to the private hospital and road phasing, permitted uses in the business park and the issue of building height flexibility in the vicinity of Highway 404 (i.e. Whitwell). Public Comments Mr. Klaus Wehrenberg, 16 Cedar Drive, Aurora commented on the preservation of the Wetlands. He expressed concern with the impact of clustering development and density on the wetland area. He suggested that some consideration might be given to allowing bonusing to enable additional wetlands to be conveyed and protected. Mr. Wehrenberg stated that never before has the Town had the opportunity to preserve such a large environmentally significant area. Miss Christie Lowett a science student from Newmarket High School made a presentation on the wetlands on behalf of her fellow students. Miss Lowett stated that they were very concerned with the impact of development on the wetlands. She pointed out how development would endanger wildlife species living in this environment by polluting the water and air. She displayed an article from the September 22, 1999 edition of the Era Banner that spoke to the issue of preserving the wetlands and controlling development within the Oak Ridges Moraine. Miss Lowett also expressed her concerns regarding development impacts on the McKenzie Marsh. Miss Lowett suggested that Magna be required to control access to the Wetlands and to show concern for the environment. She displayed a petition signed by many fellow students in support of the preservation of the Wetlands. She also advised that she had Special Council – Public Planning Minutes No. 27-99 Page 5 Thursday, September 23, 1999 contacted CKVR News to inform them of their support for the preservation of the Wetlands. Mr. Harry Froussios appeared before the Council on behalf of Loblaws Properties Ltd. He expressed concern on behalf of his client regarding the Community/Commercial designations in the prepared OPA document which allowed for additional supermarket developments. Mr. Froussios noted that his client’s lands, located at the southwest corner of St. Johns Sideroad and Bayview Avenue, currently had a Holding provision on them pending a marketing study. He suggested that the new designations were premature pending confirmation that the market could support additional supermarkets. Mr. Froussios requested that Council defer their decision on the amendment to enable sufficient time to discern the need for additional commercial uses of this type and scale. Mr. David Tomlinson, 181 Centre St., Aurora, voiced his concerns regarding development impacts on the Wetlands, adding that the creation of a wildlife sanctuary was critical. He referred to a UN report on environmental pollution and the resultant impacts on wildlife. He spoke of how the common house sparrow in Britain was on the verge of potentially becoming an endangered species due to the destruction of their habitat. Mr. Tomlinson suggested that an Environmental Consultant that is respected by Conservationists work with developers and the Town so as to ensure the protection of the Wetlands. He suggested that there be a significant buffer zone to protect the Wetlands from development, adding that developers had made millions of dollars and that it was time to give back to the environment, saving it for future generations. Mr. Tomlinson stated that he would be willing to meet with developers and the Town to determine a future course of action in preserving the Wetland area. Mr. Tomlinson concluded by stating that while land use designations were clearly defined in the Plan, the boundaries for the Wildlife Park were vague and that the buffer zones for the Wetlands needed to be clearly defined. He also expressed concern with respect to the proposed road crossings, questioning both the number of locations of same. Mr. J. Dreyer, 15428 Leslie St., Aurora, questioned the definition of “business park” and its permitted uses. He stated that he would like to know more about road patterns and access, and questioned the impact that development would have on springs in the area, in addition to the impact on the real estate value of his home as a result of the business park. W.R Hodgson of W.R. Hodgson and Associates appeared on behalf of the owner of property located at the southeast corner of St. John Sideroad and Leslie Street. He questioned whether another OPA was required to extend the business park boundary north, and whether there would be the opportunity to look at the wetlands in the adjacent Area 2C in a comprehensive manner. Mr. Ben Kestein, representing P.A.R.K.S. suggested that the Business Park should extend further up Highway 404 to be serviced by a parallel service road. His other concern was with respect to the height of buildings possibly increasing from 7 to 10 stories. Mr. Kestein also expressed concern with the establishment of any private hospital on the Magna lands, given that it could lead to a two-tier health system. Mr. Peter Smith appeared before Council representing 761933 Ontario Ltd. the owner of 100 acres on the East Side of Bayview Ave. Mr. Smith reiterated five areas of concern that had been outlined in two letters submitted to the Town from John Bousfield dated September 1 and 15, 1999. Mr. Brian Good of 15625 Bayview Ave (Spring Farms) expressed his concern with the possible destruction of the wetlands. He encouraged the Town to do all it could to protect the wetlands for the future of the Town. Mr. Steve Cohen, 1700 Wellington St., Aurora, questioned the impact that development would have on the spring located on his neighbors property, and further, he asked when sewer servicing would be available in this area. Mr. C. Brutto appeared on behalf of the owners of the Spring Farm, and the Burnett and Baggett families. On behalf of the Spring Family, Mr. Brutto expressed support for the progress that had been made to date, and that his client was interested in Special Council – Public Planning Minutes No. 27-99 Page 6 Thursday, September 23, 1999 environmental protection. He added that the issue of the road crossings needed to be further addressed and that they would like to be involved in any future discussion concerning the wetlands. On behalf of his other client, Mr. Burnett, Mr. Brutto indicated that a boundary adjustment on the Burnett property would be appropriate to a definable boundary, which was suggested to be the north property limit. Ms. Connor stated that she hoped Council would consider the emotional pleas concerning the wetlands and choose to preserve the sanctuary for the sake of the wildlife and future enjoyment of the residents of the Town. Mr. Harry Lumsden of 144 Hillview Rd., Aurora indicated that the east/west roads should be eliminated in order to protect the wildlife. He suggested that the buffer zones around the wetlands be as wide as possible. The public portion of the meeting closed at 10:13 p.m. and Council’s deliberations began. #665. Moved by Councillor West Seconded by Councillor Hogg THAT the provisions of the procedural by-law be waived and that the hour of adjournment be extended and the agenda be completed. CARRIED #666. Moved by Councillor Griffith Seconded by Councillor Hartwell THAT the boundary line between the 2B and 2C Secondary Plan be adjusted north to align with the northern property line of the Magna and Burnett properties. On a recorded vote, the resolution was DEFEATED YEAS: 2 NAYS: 6 VOTING YEA: Councillors Griffith, Mckenzie VOTING NAY: Councillors Healy, West, Hogg, Hartwell, Hinder, Mayor Jones #667. Moved by Councillor Healy Seconded by Councillor Hogg THAT subject to such input as may be received through the Public Meeting and completion of the addendum to the Environmental Management Strategy to assess the acceptable limits of development adjacent to the defined provincially significant wetlands, the proposed Official Plan Amendment for the Bayview Northeast 2B Secondary Plan be expeditiously brought before Council for consideration of adoption; THAT prior to presentation of the addendum to the Environmental Management Strategy a draft be circulated to the landowners Representatives, approval authorities, A.C.O.R.N. and any Interested parties; and, THAT in reporting back to Council on the outstanding issues raised at the public meeting, staff include the possibility of bonusing in addition to providing for some flexibility in building height for the lands immediately adjacent to Highway 404. CARRIED Mayor Jones having previously declared an interest left the meeting at this time and relinquished the Chair to Deputy Mayor West. PL99-093-279 – Applications for Official Plan Amendment, Special Council – Public Planning Minutes No. 27-99 Page 7 Thursday, September 23, 1999 Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision 1351586 Ontario Limited Part of Lot 75, Concession 1, E.Y.S. 119 Vandorf Sideroad Files D09-07-99, D14-12-99 and D12-99003A Mr. Jim Kyle, Planner, presented an overview of the subject proposal, including the property location, surrounding land uses and the current Official Plan designation and Zoning By-law provisions affecting the subject property. Mr Kyle advised that the applicant had requested an OPA from Estate Residential to Urban Residential and rezoning from Rural to Detached Dwelling Second Density (R2) Exception zone. It was noted that the requested exceptions were to reduce front yard setback from 6 metres to 4.5 metres and exterior side yard setback from 6 metres to 4.5 metres. It was noted that the purpose of the application was to permit a subdivision consisting of 7 lots. It was noted that the subject lands were part of the Yonge Street South Urban Expansion Area identified within OPA 17 and that the lands were to be part of the Master Servicing Study. Mr. Kyle stated that the subject lands are part of the Oak Ridge Moraine and that the Official Plan required that an Environmental Impact Study be completed for any development proposed in the Moraine area. He added that to date, the Town had not received this Study. Mr. Kyle stated that the area was privately serviced and that according to OPA 17 new development was only allowed to occur on full municipal services. He added that a study produced by the applicant indicated the servicing infrastructure was in place to service the proposed 7 lots. Mr. Kyle stated that arrangements had been with The Beswick Group to use the existing condominium road to access the proposed development. Mr Kyle indicated that the landscaping requirements and buffering were not addressed in the Tree Inventory Analysis. He added that the applicant proposed to reduce the exterior side yard setback from 6 metres to 4.5 metres and that this reduction raised a concern for Staff, given that the subject lands flanked onto Vandorf Sideroad. Mr. Kyle noted that the Master Servicing Study would be required by Council prior to development and that Fire and Building were concerned with the radius of the cul-de-sac. Mr. Kyle indicated that the applicant had recently submitted a new plan based on the relocated road location on the Beswick Lands and that staff have not had a chance to fully review such plan due to the timing of the submission. Mr. Kyle recommended that this application be received for information at this time and that all outstanding issues should be addressed before reporting back to Council. Applicant’s Comments Dennis Wood, solicitor for the applicant, summarized the contents of his letter dated September 23, 1999 which was currently before the Council. Mr. Wood stated that he was seeking a different disposition to the applications than was being suggested by staff. He suggested that the Master Servicing Study not be required prior to final reporting on the applications. Mr. Wood indicated that access to the proposed lots would now occur via the abutting Condominium road. He indicated that the subject lands had been excluded from the overall Secondary Plan and were to proceed with a separate secondary plan subject to the completion of a Master Servicing Plan on the basis of an earlier concept for 19 condominium units. Mr. Wood stated that his client was now only proposing 7 bungalows. Mr. Wood indicated his client was prepared to pay its fair share of Development Charges, and based on a letter received from the Ministry of Municipal Affairs, there were no environmental concerns with respect to the Oak Ridges Moraine. Mr. Wood indicated that the project would conform to the density provisions of the Town’s Official Plan, as amended by OPA 17. Mr. Jamie Bennett, a planner for the applicant, gave an overview of the location of the subject lands. He explained that they were proposing 7 new lots with road access to occur via the abutting Condominium road and that servicing would also be obtainable from the existing services within the road allowance. Mr. Bennett stated that the owner proposed to build bungalows on the new lots and that the subdivision would yield a density of 3.8 units/acre. Mr. Bennett indicated this project would serve as a completion to the Timberline neighbourhood. He added that there would be extensive vegetative planting and that while the lands were located on the Oak Ridges Moraine, the Ministry had expressed no concerns in this regard. Special Council – Public Planning Minutes No. 27-99 Page 8 Thursday, September 23, 1999 #668. Moved by Councillor Hogg Seconded by Councillor Morris THAT the provisions of the procedural by-law be waived and that the hour of adjournment be extended and the agenda be completed. CARRIED Public Comments Mr. Seymour Martin, 5 Jarvis Ave, Aurora, appeared on behalf of his neighbours to express opposition to the proposed subdivision. Mr. Martin suggested that the project was incompatible with the surrounding neighbourhood, particularly the adjacent Hazelburn community. He suggested that the integrity of the Hazelburn neighbourhood should be maintained, and that the status quo should be protected. Mr. Martin stated that the existing residents pay high taxes to live in this area, and they want their neighbourhood to stay the way it is. Mr. Martin stated that the residents had chosen to live in an estate residential subdivision for reasons such as privacy, and he saw no logical reason to allow infilling on these lands. Mr. Martin advised that his main concern was respecting the incompatibility of the density of the subdivision. Mr. Paul Walker, 2 Jarvis Ave, Aurora, indicated that he had written a letter to Council and that he too was concerned about density levels. He stated that he would be able to see the backyards of every dwelling in the proposed development. Mr. Walker suggested that the existing vegetative barrier was inadequate and he was concerned about how this project would affect the value of his house. Mr. Walker also expressed concern about the visual impact of the development, given the differential in grade between the properties. Mr. Walker concluded by requesting that the existing 2- acre designation be maintained. Mr. Eugene Benson, 3 Jarvis Ave, Aurora, indicated that his house was constructed toward the rear of his property for privacy purposes and that he can see the Beswick Group project as well as the proposed site from his kitchen window. Mr. Benson felt that the existing Estate Residential designation should be maintained. Mr. Benson questioned what would prohibit him from making a similar application to subdivide his existing 2-acre lot. Mr. Michael Blair, 11 Alm Court, Aurora, expressed opposition to the project on the basis of water supply being afforded to new development before the existing unserviced community. Mr. J. Henson, 12 Jarvis Court, Aurora, suggested that the proposed development, would set the precedent for similar type developments in the area. Mr. Claudio Brutto, Brutto Consulting, appeared on behalf of Wycliffe/Diamond to indicate his clients wanted to reserve the right to comment in writing on this proposal in the future. Ms. J. Craik, 6 Jarvis Ave, Aurora, indicated she was concerned with the increased density by adding more houses. She expressed concern about the increased traffic from this project and the resultant safety issues that would arise in exiting onto Vandorf Sideroad. Messr’s. Wood and Bennett submitted that the resultant density would be consistent with OPA 17 and that 7 homes would have an insignificant impact on the current water supply. Further, they added that they didn’t foresee 7 homes creating traffic safety issues but such a concern could be addressed by Town staff. A landscape architect for the applicant advised that 43 of 73 trees on-site were proposed to be transplanted to the buffer area. He added that there would be no need to change the existing grading, given that the proposed dwellings would be at the same elevation as the existing tudor- style home on the property. The public portion of the meeting closed at 12:43 a.m. and Council’s deliberations began. #669. Moved by Councillor Healy Seconded by Councillor Morris Special Council – Public Planning Minutes No. 27-99 Page 9 Thursday, September 23, 1999 THAT the proposal to develop seven lots on the property municipally known as 119 Vandorf Sideroad be denied on the basis that the proposal would be incompatible with the surrounding residential community. DEFFERRAL: Upon the question of the adoption of the resolution, it was: #670. Moved by Councillor Griffith Seconded by Councillor McKenzie THAT the continuation of the Council deliberations concerning this item be deferred until the Council meeting to be held on October 13, 1999 to enable the members of Council to consider the input received at the public meeting and to give them the opportunity to inspect the elevation differences on the subject property. CARRIED ADJOURNMENT #671. Moved by Councillor Healy THAT the meeting be adjourned at 1:00 a.m. CARRIED ___________________________ ____________________________________ T. JONES, MAYOR B. PANIZZA, MUNICIPAL CLERK