MINUTES - Special Council - 19860730MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING HELD IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE YORK
REGION BOARD OF EDUCATION ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 30, 1986 AT 7:30P.M.
Present Were:
Absent Were:
Mayor West and Councillors Buck, Jones,
Paivio, Pedersen, Timpson and Weller
Councillor McKenzie due to a business commitment and
Councillor Barker, due to illness
Also in attendance were Colleen E. Gowan, Deputy Clerk, Susan Seibert,
Director of Planning and Lawrence Allison., Administrative Clerk.
Mayor West advised those present that this meeting had been ca 11 ed as a
Public Meeting with respect to an application for amendment to the Official
Plan for Michael Riggs and for amendments to the Zoning By-Law for
Kenneth Murray, Michael Riggs, Beacon Hall and G. Rotundo.
Mrs. Seibert summarized the processing procedure and related policies as
practiced by the Townof Aurora for the benefit of the residents present.
The Deputy Clerk advised that the required notices of meeting were mailed on
June 19, 1986 by First Class mail, to addresses within 120 metres of the
areas, as shown on the last revised assessment roll of the Town of Aurora to
which the By-laws would apply. The necessary signs were posted on the
various properties in accordance with the rules of procedure under The
Planning Act (1983}.
Mayor West advised that any persons who wished further notice of the passage
of the By-Laws under consideration should sign the forms avai 1 able before
they leave the meeting.
The public meeting to hear application Z-25-86 began and Mrs. Seibert was
requested to outline her report.
Proposal -Application Number Z-25-86 (Kenneth Murray)
LOCATION
The subject lands are located on the north side of Wellington Street East,
just west of Walton Drive. The property is a 'through lot' with frontage on
both Wellington and Centre Street.
PROPOSAL
The applicant requests an exception to the provisions of t~e "R5 -Special
Mixed Density Residential Zone" and the permitted uses to allow the building
which fronts on Wellington Street, now used as a residence to be used as a
commercial law office.
OFFICIAL PLAN
The subject lands are designated "Urban Residential". However, Official
Plan Amendment No. 10 states:
1. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Amendment is to add to Urban Residential Policies of
the Official Plan contained in Section 4 (4}, a policy which will permit
limited commercial uses in residentially designated areas on arterial
roads in the Town's older section.
COUNCIL MEETING ••• WEDNESDAY, JULY 30, 1986
- 2 -
2. POLICIES
Limited commercial uses, such as a professional office, an artist's or
music studio, an insurance or real estate office or similar uses which
are compatible with residential uses, may be permitted in an urban
residential designation, on an arterial road as defined on Schedule "B"
to the Interim Official Plan, subject to the following.
( i)
( i i)
(iii)
(iv)
( v)
The lands being appropriately rezoned.
The applicant enters into a site plan agreement with the
municipality
That sufficient parking can be provided on the site and
suitably screened so as not to visually intrude into the
surrounding residential neighbourhood.
That the exterior appearance of the building be maintained as
a residential building. A sign may be displayed in accordance
with the provisions of the Town's sign by-law.
Where the applicant requires increased floor area, any
building additions must maintain the residential appearance of
the building and be in harmony with the original architectural
style and period of the bui 1 ding. Required yards for such
building additions will be based on existing standards in the
surrounding neighbourhood.
3. Implementation
The policies of this Official Plan Amendment will be implemented through
special zoning provisions pursuant to Section 35 of The Planning Act,
and through site plan agreements pursuant to Section 35 (a) of The
Planning Act.
AGENCY CONCERNS
Local Agencies
Fire Department (By letter dated July 10, 1986)
We have no objection to this rezoning application but, we would suggest that
the present driveway be one way only (entrance off Wellington Street East)
because of the close proximity to Wellington Street East, Larmont Street and
Walton Drive.
Building Department (By letter dated July 9, 1986)
No objection, however, a site plan agreement will be required.
Leisure Services -no objection
REGIONAL CONCERNS
Regional Medical Officer of Health -no objection
Regional Planning -no objection
Ministry of Transportation and Communications -no objection
South Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority -no objection
Ministry of Agriculture and Food -no objection
COMMENT
The subject property is currently used as a single family dwelling. The
property is surrounded by detached residential to the north, east and south,
while the adjacent property to the west is a pizza parlour.
COUNCIL MEETING ••• WEDNESDAY, JULY 30, 1986
- 3 -
COMMENT cont'd ...
The applicant intends to use the property as a law office. To the rear of
the property, nine parking spaces are proposed whereas the by-1 aw requires
only eight. Access to the site is proposed from both Wellington Street and
Centre Street. Some concern has been raised over the access to Centre
Street such that is may generate increased traffic in the area. A 1 1/2
storey garage is located on the northeast corner of the property, and is to
be retained. The existing front porch will be demolished and the original
facade of the building is to be restored.
The proposed use would appear to conform with the Official Plan although the
requirements of the Official Plan respecting screening of the parking area,
signage etc. listed above must be adhered to. Prior to third reading being
given to an amending by-law a site plan agreement should be entered into.
Public Concerns:
access to Centre Street
increased traffic
The public meeting on the application closed and Council's consideration
began.
Timpson:
Pedersen:
Resolved that the necessary By-law be prepared.
,Be It Further Resolved that the proposed site plan be amended
by the deletion of the proposed access from Centre Street.
Third reading of the By-law to be held pending finalization of
the Site Plan Agreement.
CARRIED
The public hearing to consider application Z-26-86 then commenced.
Mayor West requested that Mrs. Seibert present the details of this
application.
Proposal -Application Number Z-26-86 (G. Rotondo)
LOCATION
The subject 1 ands are 1 ocated on the north side of Wellington Street West
just east of Bathurst Street. The surrounding lands are primarily urban
residential with some large suburban lot development bordering the property
to the west.
The property itself is a 5.04 ha (12.84 acre) parcel of land which is
presently occupied by a farm dwelling, barn and accessory building. As a
result of a past severance, the property has been left with two small
parcels of land fronting on Wellington Street West. A residential lot now
separates these two parcels and hence is bordered on three sides by the
subject property.
A driveway 1 ocated on the western parcel extends north from Wellington
Street to the farmhouse. This roadway is also used as a right-of-way to the
property bordering the lands to the west and fronting on Wellington Street.
At present, the right-of-way is the only access ava i1 able to the
neighbouring property owner.
The topography of the lands is characterized by a relatively flat open field
located at the north end of the property and a gentle slope which extends
downward to Wellington Street where a man made drainage course occupies the
front portions of the property.
. --·---
COUNCIL MEETING ••• WEDNESDAY, JULY 30, 1986
- 4 -
PROPOSAL
The applicant proposes to amend the zoning by-law from "H-Holding" to "R2-
Detached Owe 11 ing Second Density Res i denti a 1 ", "R2-4 -Detached Owe 11 i ng
Second Density Resi denti a 1 Exception Zone" and "0 -Major Open Space" to
allow the area to be developed for a plan of subdivision having 55 lots and
2 open space blocks.
Twenty eight lots having a maximum lot area of 472.5 square metres (5,085.9
square feet) and a minimum lot frontage of 15 metres (49.2 feet) meet the
requirements of the R2 Zone. Exception will be needed to the provisions of
the zoning by-law for the remaining 27 lots having a minimum lot area of
425.25 square metres (4,577 .4 square feet) a minimum lot frontage of 13.5
metres (44.3 feet).
The two parcels of land fronting on Wellington Street will be conveyed to
the Town to be used as part of a storm water management network.
OFF! CIAL PLAN
The subject property was designated Urban Residential and Major Open Space
through the Aurora West Secondary Plan.
The objective of the Urban Residential area is to provide for the logical
extension of urban development in the Town of Aurora, in a manner which will
compliment its existing low density residential character. Single family
dwellings are permitted at a maximum density of 16.0 units per hectare (6.5
units per acre). The plan of subdivision as proposed would conform to this
designation.
Lands designated for Major Open Space are intended primarily for the
preservation and conservation of the natural landscape and/or environment.
COMMENT
The subject lands are currently zoned "H -Holding". This category is
applied to the lands which are intended for future development, the plans
for which are uncertain.
It is the intention of the applicant to follow through the draft approval
process for the proposed plan of subdivision containing 55 lots and 2 open
space b 1 ocks.
The proposed plan as presently submitted identifies the need for an
appropriate R2 rezoning of the subject lands to compliment the Urban
Residential land use designation set out in the Official Plan. The present
R2 -Detached Dwelling Second Density Residential lot specifications would
require a minimum lot area of 460 square metres (4951.6 square feet) and a
lot frontage of 15 metres (49.2 feet). In order to achieve the lot
configuration set out in the proposed plan exception would be required to
these specifications for 27 lots.
Since the plan has not received draft approval at this point in time it is
important to pay particular attention to the technical aspects of the plan
as they apply to the specific rezoning requested.
We have some concerns with regard to the lot configuration of the proposed
plan, in particular, those lots requiring exception, Lot Nos. 38-55. The
present 1 ayout of Street No. 2 creates an undesirable situation where we
have a number of lots backing onto the side yard of one particular lot.
Lots 38-43 and Lots 50-55 flank Lot 44 and 49 respectively. This number of
lots abutting one property is sure to raise questions over the privacy of
the one landowner. There is also some concern in creating an irregularity
in the overall density pattern of the area. Lots bordering the proposal to
the east meet the 15 m frontage requirement as do the 1 ots bordering the
suburban residential development to the west. Therefore, we have a
situation where instead of a gradual decline in density we have a slight
increase where the exception is proposed. An alternative road scheme might
alleviate this problem.
COUNCIL MEETING .•. WEDNESDAY, JULY 30, 1986
- 5 -
COMMENT cont'd •••
Public Works would prefer that the cul-de-sac located at the westerly limits
of Street No. 1 be rounded off at its southwest corner, effectively creating
two irregularly shaped blocks which could hopefully be given to abutting
landowners who hopefully will maintain same. Some additional widening of
the road allowance should take place along the frontage of Lots 32 to 34,
inclusive, as well as Block 57 and 58, similar to what has been done in the
vicinity of Lots 16 to 20, inclusive, and Lots 6 to 10, inclusive.
The Fire Department has noted that the reduction in side yard lots from 6
metres to 4.5 metres may cause concerns with roof overhang (i.e. spread of
fire) and the installation of fences may cause limited use or hinder the use
of ladders. They would recommend brick construction on the sides of the
houses to limit the spread of fire.
As mentioned earlier, a legal right-of-way currently exists over the
property running north from Wellington Street through proposed Block 59 and
Lot 31 to access Lot 1 of Registered Plan 379-A. Consideration should be
given at this point in time as to how access will be provided to the
neighbouring property owner. Another access onto Wellington Street, may be
undesirable, therefore, the applicant should look into providing access from
Street No. 1 which borders the property to the north with a 0.3 m reserve.
With reference to Blocks 59 and 60, the Major Open Space components of the
plan, the irregular arrangement of these blocks, separated by a residential
property, makes them undesirable for use in any Parkland/Open Space
Network. Therefore, these blocks are not to be included later on as
parkland dedication for the proposed subdivision. A separate cash-in-lieu
agreement will have to be resolved during the draft approval process.
Post development flows of storm water runoff must not exceed predevelopment
flows. This being the case, the method of storm water retention, and land
requirements to accommodate same, should land be needed, should be
identified at this point in time. It has been suggested that Block 60 be
tied into the present storm water management network.
Public Works notes that a watermain easement is required over Lot 31 and
Block 59 in order to accommodate an interconnecting watermain to Wellington
Street. A 1 so, the servicing of residents fronting onto Wellington Street
West and backing onto the proposed development, (i.e., residents who are
presently unserviced being that they are not on sewers or watermain), may
desire to be hooked to the applicant's proposed servicing scheme.
In summary, the proposed plan of subdivision appears to conform with the
Official Plan. The plan itself has not received draft approval so all
concerns regarding the road and lot configuration, access and servicing
requirements, etc., will have to be dealt with prior to rezoning at the
draft plan stage. Local and provincial agencies have been consulted and
their recommendations toward the submitted plan should be taken into
consideration. It is suggested that the preparation of the by-law should
await resolution of the various concerns respecting density and road design
and finalization of draft approval of the plan of subdivision.
Public Concerns:
lot configuration
road connection to Bathurst Street
storm drainage
resolution of the right of way in favour of adjacent property owner
provision of water service to adjacent residents on Wellington Street
West
width of proposed lots
The public meeting portion of consideration of the application closed and
Council's review began.
Pedersen:
Jones:
Resolved that this application be referred to the Technical
Committee to meet with the Owners to address the concerns
expressed by the public and those contained in the Planning
Department's Report.
CARRIED
COUNCIL MEETING ... WEDNESDAY, JULY 30, 1986
- 6 -
The public meeting then resumed with consideration of applications OP-27-86
and Z-28-86.
Mrs. Seibert outlined the report prepared respecting these applications.
Proposal -Application Number OP-27-86/Z~28-86 (Michael Riggs)
LOCATION
The subject lands are located on the north side of Wellington Street East
just east of the C.N.R. tracks. The surrounding lands are primarily service
industrial with some residential development fronting on Wellington Street.
A small industrial plaza which houses the applicants present service outlet,
York Taxi, borders the subject lot to the west.
The lot itself supports a large two-storey block dwelling located on the
western half with the driveway running along side the property line. A
small parking area and a one car garage are located at the rear of the
building. The remainder of the lot is presently being used as a greenspace.
PROPOSAL
The applicant proposes to amend the 1 and use designation applying to the
subject lands from "Industrial" to "Commercial" in the Official Plan and the
zoning category from "MA-l Restricted Industrial Exception" to "C2 -
Commercial" in the Zoning By-law. The amendments are required to allow the
existing building, now used as a residence, to be used as a business office
dispatch, and fleet yard for a taxi cab company.
The office would support the administrative staff of the business as well as
house the dispatch for the taxi fleet. Parking would be provided for both
the business office and taxi fleet. A new access to the proposed parking
would be provided off Wellington Street just east of the existing building.
OFFICIAL PLAN
The subject lands are currently designated "Industrial". Limited service
commercial or similar uses deemed compatible with the incidental to an
industrial area are permitted subject to amendment to the Zoning By-Law.
The taxi fleet yard would be considered as industrial use with the business
office incidental to the fleet. The proposal would conform to this
designation.
COMMENT
The subject lands are currently zoned "MA-l Restricted Industrial Exception".
It is the intention of the applicant to use the existing bui 1 ding and
grounds as an administrative office, central dispatch and fleet yard for his
cab company which operates under the name of York Taxi in Aurora, B-Line in
Newmarket and East Gwill imbury in northern York Region. At present, there
is no central office or dispatch for the three. York Taxi operates out of a
small office next door to the subject property which has a service facility
for the cars at the rear. This office would remain in use primarily as a
service outlet for the fleet.
The applicant has applied for an Offici a 1 Plan Amendment on the basis that
he would require a "Commercial" designation to permit the taxi business
office, dispatch and fleet yard. We found the information provided on the
application misleading as the primary use has since been confirmed as the
fleet yard for the taxi cab company, an industrial use. Therefore, we feel
the proposed use would conform to the present "Industrial" designation
provided an amendment to the Zoning By-Law is made.
The property would have to be rezoned to "M-1 -Restricted Industria 1
Service Exception" with an exception to permit the taxi cab use.
COUNCIL MEETING •.• WEDNESDAY, JULY 30, 1986
- 7 -
COMMENT cont'd •••
According to the general provisions regarding office space parking, 6 spaces
would be required for the proposed office space of 157.93 square metres
(1700 square feet). The applicant is proposing a large parking area to the
rear and side of the building with parking for approximately 30 cars. The
lot would serve dual purpose of providing the 6 required office spaces and a
parking area for the taxi fleet and the employees' cars. It should be noted
that the entire fleet, 25 cars, would not be using the parking facility at
any given time as the company operates on a 24 hour/7 days a week schedule.
The main objective of the lot is to handle the employees who bring their
cars to work and the overlap of shifts.
The lot itself would require a considerable amount of fill at the northeast
corner of the property. Whenever the surface of the parking area is more
than ten centimetres higher than any adjoining land, a suitable retaining
wall shall be installed a 1 ong the edge of the parking 1 ot or a 1 ong the 1 ot
line.
Region a 1 Engineering would require that the driveway fronting on Wellington
Street be located at the extreme east end of the property to keep the sight
distance to the railway tracks at an optimum. It should be noted that
detailed entrance plans showing adequate drainage etc. will be required by
the Region during the site approval process.
Where a lot is used for a commercial purpose and the interior side or rear
lot 1 ine abuts an existing residential use then an adequate planting strip
is required as a buffer. The existing cedar trees along the rear lot line
provide good screening. Some additional planting might occur along the east
lot line, infilling amongst existing trees, to screen the parking area from
the neighbouring residential property.
In summary, the proposal would appear to conform to the Official Plan and
therefore, would only require a zoning by-1 aw amendment to permit the taxi
cab use. Details on the design and construction of the parking area and
entrance way and a landscaping scheme will be required. It is suggested
that should Council determine that an amendment to the by-law is
appropriate, third reading of such by-law should await the finalization of
these details through site plan agreement.
Public Concerns:
proposed shift of driveway eastward would create a traffic hazard due to
steep slope and also have a negative effect on adjacent residential
property
grading and retaining devices required to ensure containment of
stormwater
The public meeting closed and Council began deliberation on the applications.
Pedersen:
Timpson:
Resolved that the necessary zoning by-law be prepared for
1st and 2nd reading with 3rd reading to be held
pending finalization of the site plan agreement. The Regional
Engineering concern regarding access to be addressed.
CARRIED
The public meeting then reopened with the consideration of application Z-29-
86.
Mrs. Seibert was requested to outline her report on this subject.
Proposal -Application Number Z-29-86 -Beacon Hall Golf Club
LOCATION
The subject lands are located in Concession 1 E.Y.S. and have a frontage of
160 m on Yonge Street, 402 m on Bayview Avenue and 65 m on Vandorf Road.
The total area of the lands to be rezoned is approximately 102 ha (253
acres).
COUNCIL MEETING ••• WEDNESDAY, JULY 30, 1986
- 8 -
PROPOSAL
The applicants propose to amend the zoning by-law applying to the subject
lands from "RU -Rural" to Special Major Open Space, Special Rural
Residential and Institutional to permit the lands to be developed for an 18
hole "championship" golf course with a clubhouse facility including dining
and recreation uses and an outdoor swimming pool. The residential component
of the proposal includes 20 apartment units located on the hillside near the
boundary between lots 73 and 74, 48 woodlot terrace housing units
(townhouses) 1 ocated in the centre of the property in clusters and 14
townhouses which would be located in lot 75 at the northern boundary of the
property. A block of approximately 10-12 acres in size adjacent to Yonge
Street has been set aside to allow for the expansion of the cemetery.
OFFICIAL PLAN
Official Plan Amendment No. 35 proposed to redesignate the subject lands to
specifically permit the proposed development. The Amendment was adopted by
Council on May 6, 1985 and was sent to the Minister for approval on May 27,
1986.
The lands to be designated 'Special Rural Residential' would permit the
development of the proposed townhouses and apartment units. The area to be
designated 'Special Major Open Space' allows for the development of the golf
course, clubhouse and accessory buildings.
AGENCY COMMENTS
Local Agencies
Fire -We would recommend that piped water to strategically located fire
hydrants be installed to provide adequate water supply for fire protection.
Building -no objection.
Leisure Services -Concerned about the treatment of tributaries in this
area. Need more detailed plan.
Regional Agencies
Medical Officer of Health (by letter dated July 16, 1985)
There is no objection to this proposal from a Public Health point of view
and the proposed subdivision or development will be dealt with on its merits
when it is presented in respect to the water supply and private sewage
disposal systems.
Regional Engineering Commissioner (by letter dated July 21, 1986)
We have reviewed the above application and note that is is for a zoning
amendment to permit the golf course and residential development proposed by
Official Plan Amendment No. 35. This letter is to request that the zoning
by-law include the requirements set out in the recommendations of Technical
Report No. 582 OP, adopted by Regional Council on March 27, 1986. These
requirements are that the development will be served by a municipal water
supply, a communal private sewage system and that irrigation of the golf
course shall be provided only by means of surface water, all in manner
acceptable to the Regional Engineering Commissioner, the Regional Medical
Officer of Health and the Ministry of the Environment.
COMMENT
The subject proposa 1 represents a major recreation and res i denti a 1
development within the Town of Aurora. Considerable scrutiny must be given
to a proposal of this magnitude in order to ensure maximum functionabil ity
of the development and compatibility with the surrounding area.
The proposed development is bordered to the south and west by estate
residential subdivisions. To the north is a proposed tennis club and across
Vandorf Road is industrial. To the east across Bayview Avenue are a couple
of detached residences on large lots.
COUNCIL MEETING ... WEDNESDAY, JULY 30, 1986
- 9 -
COMMENT cont'd ••.
In general the proposed development is compatible and complimentary to the
surrounding land uses. However, in order to minimize any effects of the
proposal on the surrounding area, special attention must be given to the
uses and setbacks which are proposed for the fringes of the development.
Official Plan Amendment No. 35 outlines in general what areas can be used
for residential development and what areas may be used for the golf course.
With regards to this the Amendment states as follows:
"The design of the golf course will be such as to ensure privacy for
surrounding residents and to protect them from activities associated with
the golf course. Such landscaping or fencing required to ensure this will
be provided by the owner. From the property boundary to the proposed
residential buildings will be a minimum distance of .60 metres."
However, a number of area residents have expressed concern with the
proximity of some of the greens, tees, and fairways to the rear lot lines of
the neighbouring subdivisions. Perhaps, a 'buffer zoning' along the fringes
of the golf course could be instituted whereby (tees, greens and fairways)
could not be located. This would alleviate any residents concerns regarding
future alterations to the golf course that may infringe on their privacy.
There is also some concern with regards to the proximity of the residential
component to the boundary of the property. 0. P .A. 35 permits residential
buildings to be no closer than 60 metres, however, as an added assurance, it
may be suggested that the zoning for the residences be site specific to the
location of the actual residential buildings.
It is recommended that third reading of the By-Law not be given until a site
plan control agreement has been finalized •. The site plan agreement will
detail the precise location of all buildings and structures as well as the
extent of the golf course itself. The 'buffer zoning' along the golf
course, and site specific residential zoning (mentioned above) would provide
an even greater degree of insurance that there be appropriate setbacks from
the boundaries of the property.
Public Concerns:
assurance that wells will not be utilized to supply domestic or
irrigational water requirements
access to the development from Yonge Street
assurance that residential component will have the minimum 60 m. setback
contained in the Official Plan Amendment
berming and landscaping required to reduce impact on adjacent neighbours
in certain areas
golf course aspect to be guaranteed for certain period of time to
preclude future residential development
the proposed density exceeding that permitted by the Official Plan
Amendment when the existing and proposed dwellings are combined with the
Tennis Club's proposal, both subject to the same Official Plan Amendment
affect on irrigation ponds on the existing water course downstream
exclusion of any buildings or structures, golf cart paths with the
proposed buffer areas around the extremity of the proposal
The public meeting respecting this application was closed.
meeting to review this matter opened.
The council
Timpson:
Jones:
Resolved that this matter be referred to the Technical
Committee for finalization of the details concerning the
Site Plan Agreement and the related zoning by-law amendment.
CARRIED
----.. ---····"~~· ,. ">' .,~.C:.c:~.-:~~·---~~-----~----•--• __ ....;..,.,..,,..,.·-·~="•"'•'w·="""-""'"==~0>~ .-.-_,.y-~'¢'=·'" ·~--~---• -~-~----
COUNCIL MEETING ••. WEDNESDAY, JULY 30, 1986
-10 -
RESOLUTIONS
1. Appointment to Permanent Staff-Mr. Chadwick Foreshew
Timpson:
Weller:
Resolved that, upon the recommendation of R. J.
Harrington Chief Building Official, and upon satisfactory
completion of his six (6) month probationary period, Mr.
Chadwick Foreshew be appointed to permanent staff effective
July 27, 1986.
CARRIED
2. Appointment to Permanent Staff -Mrs. Carol Lackey
Pedersen:
Weller:
Resolved that upon the recommendation of Colleen E. Gowan,
Deputy Clerk and upon the satisfactory completion of her six
(6) month probationary period, Mrs. Carol Lackey be appointed
to the permanent staff of the Town of Aurora effective August
1, 1986.
CARRIED
3. Authorization to Sign Subdivision Agreement -Granada Investments
Timpson:
Buck::
Resolved that, subject to the Owner providing the
necessary financial securities, the Mayor and Clerk be
authorized to sign a subdivision agreement dated the 30th day
of July, 1986, between the Corporation of the Town of Aurora
and Granada Investments Ltd. pertaining to draft Plan of
Subdivision 19T-81087
Be It Further Reso 1 ved that upon exec uti on of the agreement,
the Town of Aurora does hereby allocate the necessary
servicing capacity to the six (6) lots in the said draft Plan
of Subdivision 19T-81087
CARRIED
4. Authorization to purchase Tractor -Parks Department
Pedersen:
Jones:
Resolved that a Case International Tractor for the Parks
Department be purchased from Chas. Richards & Sons at a cost
of $16,199.65, the funds for this expenditure are to come from
the Vehicle Rep 1 a cement Reserve Account and the Sea 1 of the
Corporation be attached hereto.
CARRIED
5. Authorization to purchase Mower -Parks Department
Pedersen:
Paivio:
Resolved that a Green Mower be purchased from Brouwer Turf
Equipment Ltd. at a cost of $3,925.00, the funds for this
expenditure to come from the Vehicle Replacement Reserve
Account and the Seal of the Corporation be attached hereto.
CARRIED
6. Final Payment to Canadian Pipeline Cleaning for Swabbing of Various
Watermains
Buck:
Weller:
Resolved that upon the recommendation of Wm. Walker, Director
of Public Works, the Statement for final payment to
Canadian Pipeline Cleaning for the Foam Swabbing of Various
Watermains in the amount of $17,247.40 be paid (the payment to
be charged to Account No. 9120-40) and the Seal of the
Corporation be attached hereto.
CARRIED
COUNCIL MEETING ... WEDNESDAY, JULY 30, 1986
-11 -
BY-LAWS
Timpson:
Buck:
Timpson:
Buck:
Timpson:
Buck:
ADJOURNMENT
Pedersen:
Mayor
Be It Hereby Resolved That:
Bill Number 2859-86 -
Bill Number 2860-86 -
Being a By-law to Prohibit
or Regulate the Erection of Signs
or other Advertising Devices, and the
Posting of Notices on Buildings or
Vacant Lots within the Municipality
of the the Town of Aurora;
Being a By-law to amend By-law
No. 2345-80, as amended a By-1 aw for
1 icensing regulating and governing
taxi cab brokers, owners and drivers
of taxi cabs and the fares to be
charged by the owners of drivers of
cabs for the conveyance of passengers
within the Town of Aurora
... be read a First Time.
CARRIED
Be It Hereby Resolved That:
Bill Number 2859-86 -
Bill Number 2860-86 -
Being a By-law to Prohibit
or Regulate the Erection of Signs
or other Advertising Devices, and the
Posting of Notices on Buildings or
Vacant Lots within the Municipality
of the the Town of Aurora;
Being a By-law to amend By-law
No. 2345-80, as amended a By-1 aw for
licensing regulating and governing
taxi cab brokers, owners and drivers
of taxi cabs and the fares to be
charged by the owners of drivers of
cabs for the conveyance of passengers
within the Town of Aurora
... be read a Second Time.
CARRIED
Be It Hereby Resolved that Section 21 of By-Law Number
2554-83 be suspended and Bill Number 2859-86, now before
the Counci 1 , be read a Third Time and enacted and the Third
Reading be taken as read.
CARRIED
Resolved that the meeting be adjourned at 9:47 p.m.
CARRIED